President Assad's Interview with Spanish El Pais
Newspaper
Sunday, October 01, 2006
Damascus, Oct. 01 (SANA)- President Bashar al-Assad summarized in an interview
with the Spanish best selling newspaper of El- Pais Syria's stances over the
regional and international developments, particularly after the Israeli war on
Lebanon as well as several topics regarding internal affairs.
President Assad said that one of the mistakes committed by the big powers is
that they deal with an event on a short-term basis. He asserted that Syria's
stance remained unchanged before and after the war, adding that one of the
reasons which led to the war is that they didn't understand Syria's role or the
problems of the region in addition to not understanding the role of the previous
UNIFIL.
As for the UN Security Council resolution 1701 which talked about international
forces that came to Lebanon, His Excellency said that Syria had a stance that it
supported the UNIFIL and had warned in 2000 against reducing them at that time.
President Assad added that Syria's public stance over the resolution 1701 is
that it is quite unbalanced, but we have to deal with its positive sides. His
Excellency pointed out that there were vague sides in this resolution which
takes positive and negative interpretations. He asserted that the final solution
lies in establishing the peace.
On the Spanish participation in the UNIFIL, President Assad said that "as long
as we support the UNIFIL, it's natural that we support the participation of any
country in it…Spain in itself is a state with credibility for the Arabs. If the
UNIFIL remains under its known legal powers, namely under the 6th not the 7th
Article, and these troops make success in their role…as it's in need to
stability in the region, and in parallel with the presence of these
multi-national forces…then the parallel political work is very important for the
success of Spain and others."
His Excellency said that Europe's role in peace is important even peace seems
far away, pointing out that this role had considerably retreated last year,
particularly when Europe was preoccupied with the European Constitution or
because of the divisions before the war on Iraq. "Spain is part of Europe, so we
see that this participation is positive provided the existence of the
environment so that it remains positive."
On the safe return of the Spanish troops participating in the UNIFIL to their
country, President Assad said that "if Spain or the other countries commit
themselves to Spain's neutral stance, and not like the stance of the Germans who
said they have come to protect Israel…these forces should not come to be part of
the Lebanese problem…this means that if a later resolution is issued by the UN
Security Council under the 7th Article, then these forces would become part of
the problem."
His Excellency added that the importance of these forces is not by their arms
but rather by the fact that each group represents a country, and this in itself
constitutes a real deterrent on the ground…these points allow the Spanish
soldiers to make success in their mission and return safe."
"However, if the forces are sent to remain forever….then our problem with the UN
resolutions is that it issues resolutions and then the world go to sleep…but if
we consider the resolution 1701 as an interim solution and we have to return to
the peace process …then I believe that the subject could be for very few
years….for example our vision for peace was that it could take not more than two
years since its beginning in Madrid…and if we want to start from where we left
off then the negotiations need six months."
On controlling the Syrian-Lebanese borders, His Excellency said that "we made
fortified the borders with Lebanon… but of course this led to moving part of the
border guards from Iraq borders to Lebanon borders…and perhaps the resolution
1800 is issued to return our troops from Lebanon to Iraq."
President Assad pointed out to Syria's cooperation with the issues of the
existence of technical equipment to supervise the borders as proposed by UN
chief Kofi Annan and the Italians. He indicated that these procedures are all
"time wasting as they are an escape from the big solution."
His Excellency added that "experience in our region over the past decades has
proved that if resistance has a public support then it can get what it wants…so
time should not be wasted in small things like this subject."
The President pointed out that the countries concerned have no choice but to
have confidence in Syria "because if there is a real desire in smuggling then
neither the UN Security Council resolutions nor all technologies or armies of
the world can prevent this process….there must be a return to the peace."
President Assad reiterated Syria's support to the resistance as long as there is
occupation to the lands, particularly that our lands are also occupied.
The president pointed out that the strength of Hezbollah "is mainly not
militarily but rather a public strength that is not restricted to a certain sect
as some people seek claim….it cannot be in this strength if there is no public
wide range support in Lebanon."
His Excellency said that "Syria has been helping in rebuilding the villages
which had been destroyed, along with other sides of this cooperation, most of
which is the political support because we're convinced that they are defending a
just issue because as I said we are suffering from the same situation."
On the conditions that make the Lebanese State control this country and solve
the issue of Hezbollah within the State, President Assad pointed out to the
dialogue which took place in Lebanon several months before the war, saying that
this dialogue was not sponsored by the State as it was divided into sides.
President Assad indicated that the Lebanese State is supposed to possess the
strength of the country… and the State is the side which possesses the
capability of deterrence…and when these conditions are available and these is a
State that represents all the Lebanese then things would go this direction."
On Syria's support to Mr. Hassan Nassrullah and the Lebanese resistance which is
described as Islamic and whether this could lead to problems inside a secular
system, President Assad stressed that Hezbollah Secretary General Mr. Nassrullah
stressed in his political discourse and practice as well as most of the forces
allied with him that they are secular forces, including Christian forces.
"If he doesn't have this support, he can't be strong…he is defending a national
issue and not only an Islamic one…so there is a consensus by different sects in
the Arab countries and not only in Lebanon on his policies…there is no concern
at all regarding this point," president Assad asserted.
On Syria's role in preventing the Lebanese sides from bringing the situation in
Lebanon to the verge of collapse, President Assad said that "in the beginning we
have to define the reason for all what happened…the beginning was the resolution
1559 at the UN Security Council…when a resolution is issued to intervene in the
internal affairs of a country then this country is divided or destroyed, and
definitely when the country still has a problem of sectarian or political
division, in addition to the wrong international role before and after the
assassination of Hariri."
His Excellency went on to say that "our stance in Syria over the current
situation in Lebanon is to encourage the Lebanese dialogue…but surely we support
the Lebanese national trends which don't accept foreign intervention."
On the situation of some arrested people in Syria, President Assad pointed out
that nobody in the past intervened with the groups that continuously criticized
the State in Syria.
The President indicated that "the subject is quite different as there are groups
from Lebanon which publicly and officially called on the US to occupy Damascus
and strike Syria, and these according to the Syrian law have become in the enemy
line, and any person or state that calls for occupying your country is an enemy.
These groups have dealt directly with these forces…and there was an official
meeting and direct coordination with them…and this according to the law
immediately leads to prison because it's a dealing with an enemy."
His Excellency pointed out that the number of those are more than 200, ten of
them who were considered as responsible were detained, and then with the
investigations six were released. "The trail proceedings are continuous as any
other trial…there are lawyers….and other persons may be released…we don't
intervene in the case as it has nothing to do with the opinion or something like
that…it's rather a case of relations with somebody who is considered an enemy."
On Syria's concerns over Brammertz report, President Assad said "the report will
be a source of concern if it is of political objectives, but if it is made to
uncover the crime, this will come in our interest… the important thing in the
report is that it showed that Syria was cooperative as in the last report… but
with regard to the international court, there is a question.. What are the
available facts on which the international court will depend… we have to wait
for the outcomes of the investigation."
Regarding his vision on the US role in the comprehensive peace process,
President Assad's said "the US didn't play the role of the honest sponsor, and,
unfortunately, there are no international powers that can play the US role…and
the US cannot stand alone, and here comes the European role".
His Excellency pointed out that one of the mistakes committed by some Europeans
in the past is that they played the role of that who marketed an American ides.
President Assad clarified that the US is far fro m the region politically and
geographically, thus it is in need to us, namely with the region to understand
the problem…it's in need to the European role to understand the problem better.
"If Europe is stronger, namely more independent of the US but at the same time
have an integrated role with it.. and if there was a balance in the UN role…
this would make the US role more balanced, and then peace will be achieved," the
president added.
He called on the US Administration to listen to the others and to begin with
those who are related to the problem, saying "they should listen to us and
recognize that they made mistakes."
President Assad noted that war on terrorism didn’t only fail but it had
contributed to increasing it, saying "terrorism today is stronger than Sep.11,
and we should move along with the Europeans to convince the US administration
that the preemptive war creed has hurt the US and the world."
On the existing situation between Syria and Israel, President Assad said "the
problem is linked to two sides not one side….this situation is linked to one
thing which is peace…or maybe war if there is no peace process."
"We have clear vision, and events have proven that we think in the right
direction of future and that our vision didn't depend on the principle of
strength weakness… but it was based on principles, history and the people's
aspirations, while the Israeli vision depends, unfortunately, on the principle
of a strong army….but events in Iraq and Afghanistan as well the latest war have
proved that the military power achieves nothing."
President Assad added that that Israel has no vision now, and this is another
problem, "because the principle of power has been destroyed and the Israeli
vision has failed, and our vision remained."
On relations between Syria and the US, President Assad described it as
"semi-severed now at least on the political and security level", saying "the
problem with the US administration is that they have no intention to hear the
reality… all what we have said before the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq and on
terrorism are happening in details now and we have discovered after cooperating
with them that we are losing even in the political and security cooperation."
He added that the relations could change when the US accept the reality as it is
and recognize it and when they know that we are a state that has our own
interests.
On the Iranian nuclear dossier, President Assad said that "Iran now is a nuclear
power whether we like it or not, and we are explaining this concept to the Arab
countries."
"If there is concerns over the nuclear capability or the supposed nuclear bomb a
supposed, then why don't we discuss the Israeli nuclear bombs ?," the President
asked.
President Assad underlined that it's not reasonable to have concerns over Iran
and forget about Israel, describing this as illogical as Israel, not Iran, is
the party which wages aggressions in the region.
The President recalled the Syrian initiative submitted to the UN Security
Council in 2003 which stressed the importance of removing weapons of mass
destruction from the Middle East, clarifying that the US stood against this
initiative, wondering "if they were true, why didn't they accept the Syrian
initiative."
Regarding the danger of striking Syria and Iran, the President said that as the
preemptive war principle still exists, the whole world should have concern and
we are part of this world and have concerns over this principle in general.
On the modernization and development in Syria and the reason behind their slow
pace in some stages, President Assad said that there are factors related to this
issue, and what is currently underway is a development of the State which is
linked to the country as a whole.
His Excellency pointed out to the problems which block this process, including
technical and social sides as well as the size of support which comes from
abroad where all attempts have failed in the past years to get real support from
developed countries, adding that we are also in the process of revision of our
mistakes and correcting them.
The President added that the other side of the issues is linked to internal and
outside political circumstances which intermingle to a great deal and affect the
process of modernization and development.
He indicated that "we are in a region that lives on ideologies…and it's affected
by what is happening around us in Iraq, the war on terrorism and the
international wrong policy, particularly the US policy which has crated a very
negative internal reaction that has increased isolation rather than increasing
openness…it increase tension for the ordinary man of street."
"Political openness depends on accepting the other party…when extremism and
isolation increases the other party increases in its rejection…so we saw again
terrorist operations since 2004 in Syria after we have forgotten them since
mid-1980's…the most important thing is to know that these operations are not
linked to terrorist organizations and nor related to what is happening with us
or related with countries…and here is the danger….they constitute a local social
case that moves alone…and this case is surrounded by big state of extremism."
Ahmad F. ZAHRA / Mazen