On August 18, 2000 in his Lebanese Bulletin No. 166 General Aoun invites the Lebanese
leaders interested in saving their country to a round table discussion because
"salvation is in the unification of vision and effort..."
He warned them that the eliminations of political forces with a popular basis is ongoing
and will eventually reach each and every one of them if they do not stand up and speak up
against it.
Today with the elimination of not just the political leaderships but of Lebanon as a whole
we re-publish this Bulletin and wonder if the remaining Lebanese leaders will unify vision
and effort to save the country or will they shy away till no one is left to speak up?
Lebanese Bulletin No. 166 18Aug 2000
Beyond the Elections
After a quarter of a century of troubles and crises in Lebanon, and
with the general failure of its people and institutions, as well as a nation, it is clear
that every Lebanese must do a soul-searching and ask himself what is it in the end that
they have accomplished. It is our belief that the Lebanese people have the capability and
the knowledge to decide for themselves what they want and what they do not want, and they
know the way to get there.
It is no important at this stage to find out who was right and who was wrong. Now is not
the time for accounting, and everyone knows that salvation is in the unification of vision
and effort. And that won't happen unless the Lebanese meet around a table to discuss and
synthesize what constitutes their choices and helps them avoid the evil of separation and
division. In this manner they would have laid the foundations for a model nation with all
the values to embrace everyone.
Success and failure in these elections is moot so long as the bases are corrupt, for the
winners will not represent the people any more than the losers, and the losers won't
represent the people any less than the winners. Both sides are a set of pawns that are
assembled and separated at will by both overt and covert hands. The value of these
elections, then, is not in their outcome, but rather in the events leading to them, their
denunciation by the candidates, and the breakdown of the Mafia code of silence (Omerta).
The Lebanese discovered in these elections that they indeed live in a dictatorship wearing
a mask of virtual democracy.
The elimination of political forces with a popular basis is ongoing. It does not augur
well for a bright future to a people whose leadership is isolated in order to impose on it
chaos and the loss of its character. For as the country falls prey to chaos, it becomes
easier to control the people and lead them like sheep into the stall.
What is required is therefore a meeting of the Lebanese leaders who want Lebanon as a
nation in order to define the pact that makes this nation and its foundations. No external
relations can supersede these foundations, nor can internal relations. An end must be put
to the decline resulting from this imbalance of relations, and which is taking the country
down to its demise.
We also must define a charter of the fundamental rights of the citizen that guarantees
that no individual shall ever be enslaved by fear or want, and never be held hostage to
complete a formality or settle a violation, and never see his or her interests threatened
because he or she expressed their opinion.
I call on the Lebanese leadership to such a meeting in Beirut if I am allowed to go to
them. But if it is not possible to meet in Beirut, then let it be in Paris or in any other
city. This meeting will not be against anyone, it is simply a reaching out for better
relations with ourselves first, because only when we establish good relations with
ourselves that we are able to have good relations with others.
Silent majorities encourage great crimes and human disasters. Let me conclude with the
revelation made by the German minister Martin Neumuller when he spoke about the increasing
crimes in Nazi Germany, saying, "When they arrested the Communists, I did not say
anything because I was not a Communist. When they came for the Socialists, I did not say
anything because I was not a Socialist. And when they took away the leaders of the
syndicates, I was not a syndicate leader and so I did not say anything. Then they came for
the Jews and I did not say anything because I was not a Jew. So when they finally came to
take me away, there was no one left to say anything".
General Michel Aoun