Shebaa Farms &
The Hezbollah Facade
By: Elias Bejjani
August 17/06
In the middle of the many efforts to ensure the implementation of the UN
Resolution 1701 in the devastating aftermath of the Israel-Hezbollah war in Lebanon, the big lie of Shebaa Farms surfaces again.
This lie was fabricated under the puppet Lebanese regime in 1990 when the
hegemony of the Syrian Baathist occupier of Lebanon was still in effect. This
false issue has been since the pretext to pre-empt the ability of the Lebanese
state to assume its responsibilities, an alibi to maintain tensions along
the Israeli-Lebanese border, an excuse to keep the Iranian-Syrian influence in
Lebanon and a justification for maintaining the military presence
and influence of Hezbollah.
Through the Shebaa lie, truths have been falsified, history has been disfigured,
and a case has been fabricated from scratch for no other reason but to serve the
interests of the Baathist Syrians and Iranian Mullas. The objective of this
document is to shed light on the Shebaa Farms issue in a chronological overview
spanning the period from 1924 to the present. Hezbollah stands today against the
international will refusing to implement resolution 1559 and to end its illegal
and religious hegemony over the three mini states that its leadership erected
inside the state of Lebanon.
On May 25, 2000 the Israeli Labor government decided to implement UN Resolution
425 issued by the Security Council on March 19, 1978 and withdrew its troops
from the "security zone" border strip. At the same time, it also implemented the
clauses pertaining to it of UN resolution 426 that was voted by the Security
Council on the same date and which represents a mechanism for implementing
resolution 425.
It is worth noting that the Israeli withdrawal and its background are no longer
a secret since it was carried out as part of a total agreement between Israel,
Iran, Syria, the Lebanese regime and Hezbollah under the supervision of the
United Nations represented by Terje Rod-Larsen, the Special Envoy of the UN
Secretary General. The agreement stipulated, among many other conditions, the
dismantling of the South Lebanon Army (SLA) and the decommissioning of its
weapons, the closure of all passage points between the Lebanese border strip and
Israel, the facilitation of Hezbollah's takeover and control of the south and
the dispatch of its fighters along the borders instead of the Lebanese Army.
The Lebanese Taef regime did not implement the clauses of Resolution 426
pertaining to it, which calls for handing over security on the international
border to the Lebanese Army and spreading the authority of the Lebanese State
over the entire South. A combination of Syrian will and international-Israeli
complicity granted Hezbollah the exclusivity of controlling the South, thus
preventing the Lebanese State from shouldering its responsibilities in the
region as it is supposed to do. Hezbollah continues to this day to carry out
this highly suspicious mission assigned to it, maintaining in a historically
unprecedented and
twisted logic that the Lebanese Army is not a police force and will not be
deployed to protect the Israeli border. Meanwhile, Damascus and its barkers in
Beirut continue to accuse of treason any Lebanese who demands the spread of the
authority of the Lebanese State – through its legitimate forces – to the South
and along the Lebanese-Israeli border.
Only one week after the Israeli withdrawal, Syria concocted the problem of the
Shebaa Farms and made a hot issue out of it, cloaking around it a false cause
for a new resistance to replace the resistance pretext that was lost with the
Israeli withdrawal. The fact is that the vast majority of the Lebanese people,
and first among them the howlers of steadfastness, merchants of liberation, and
peddlers of unity of purpose and destiny, and all the quixotic wielders of
swords, butcher's knives and daggers had never heard of the Farms and had no
idea whatsoever if the Farms were in Lebanon or in Timbuktu !
The Syrian producer of this tragic comedy had decided to hand over the South to
Hezbollah under the pretext of a continued Israeli occupation of the Shebaa
Farms. Damascus had from the start tried to play the card of the seven Lebanese
villages that were annexed to Palestine in 1924 by the Mandatory Powers Britain
and France when the latter drew the borders between Lebanon, Syria, and
Palestine. But Syria did not find this issue to be fertile ground for achieving
its goal of maintaining tensions on the Lebanese-Israeli border.
It should be noted here that the borders between the three countries were
confirmed internationally in 1949 after the creation of the state of Israel. And
from that time, the Armistice Agreement between Lebanon and Israel became the
working modality for the borderline between the two countries and the
Engineering Corps of the Lebanese Army drew the borderline under the supervision
of international observers in the early 1960s.
Since 1924, the Shebaa Farms were treated as Lebanese territory, but Syria
refused to recognize this fact, as it refused indeed to recognize the
independence of Lebanon as a sovereign country. In the 1950s, Syria seized the
Shebaa Farms and kept the territory under its control until Israel occupied the
Farms – as part of its seizure of the Golan Heights – in 1967. Syrian control of
the Farms was an anomaly because the inhabitants and properties were Lebanese,
but the administration and authorities in charge were Syrian.
Lebanon did not accept Syria's control of the Farms but did not seek redress at
the United Nations or with the Arab League out of fear of adding complexity to
the issue. Still, the Syrians remained obstinate in maintaining their grip on
the territory and never paid much attention to Lebanon's claims.
In 1961, Lebanon tried to open a police station in the Shebaa Farms, but Syrian
forces there killed a number of Lebanese gendarmes and evicted the others by
military force. This event is documented in one of the issues of the Lebanese
Army Magazine. In a press conference organized by An-Nahar on December 4, 2000,
Retired Lieutenant Colonel Adnan Shaaban said that the Shebaa Farms is Lebanese
territory under Syrian sovereignty, reminding those who forgot of the document
published by the Lebanese Soldier Magazine in 1961, in which it is reported that
4 Lebanese soldiers of various ranks were killed by the Syrian "brothers"
because they entered into territory under Syrian sovereignty (according to the
Syrian version of events). The photos of their sacrifice are available in the
files of the Army's Directorate of Orientation and Information.
The inhabitants of the Farms and landowners there have raised the matter and
complained many times to successive Lebanese governments – from the time of
Bechara El-Khoury through the presidency of Fuad Shihab. They also raised the
issue many times directly to the Syrian authorities with petitions, sit-ins,
dispatching delegations and mediators, but unfortunately to no avail. Syria
insisted on imposing its authority by force over the Shebaa Farms.
In his book, "Lebanon: Political Absurdity and Unknown Fate" (Dar An-Nahar
Press, pp. 293-294), the former Prime Minister of Lebanon, the late Sami Solh,
mentions the Shebaa Farms as follows:
"Lebanese-Syrian relations continued to deteriorate during 1956-1958, whereby
severe border problems came up when Syrian authorities established a police
station and Al Mujahideen' camp in the Shebaa Farms, as reported by Lebanese
security sources. The inhabitants of the Shebaa Farms were warned (September
1957) by Syrian authorities that families there should submit statements saying
that they accept the Syrian identity instead of the Lebanese. With the
recurrence of attacks against Lebanese civilians, a delegation of the notables
of Shebaa led by the Mayor of the Farms went to Damascus to talk to senior
officials in the Syrian leadership, beginning with Prime Minister Sabri
Al-Assali and Speaker of Parliament Akram Al-Hourani, but to no avail. When the
same southern delegation came to visit me, and I was informed of the details of
developments there, I emphasized to the delegation the necessity of holding on
to their Lebanese identity and keeping it, and I promised the southerners to
work to solve the issue, support their steadfastness, prevent
the attacks, and reduce the pressures on them. After that, I immediately
contacted the Egyptian ambassador in Damascus, Mahmoud Riyad, and explained to
him the situation and what the Lebanese citizens have to endure, and that these
actions are not in the interest of Egypt, nor are they in the interests of Syria
and Lebanon. To the contrary, they hurt relations and the basic interests
between the concerned nations and their peoples. I also informed him very
emphatically that the issue was having a negative influence on the Arab and
international scenes because the matter was no longer limited to the dispatching
of men and weapons across the border , but has now reached the point of cutting
off territories and annexing them along with their inhabitants. At the same
time, I issued Decree No. 493, dated December 14, 1957 calling on the Lebanese
authorities in the Shebaa Farms to record all events and transgressions, and
exert their utmost efforts to protect and preserve the Lebanese identity of the
Shebaa Farms (including: Kfar Douma, Marah Malloul, Qafwa, Ramta, Khallit
Ghazaleh, Fashkoul, Jourit Al-Aqareb, Al-Rubaa, Beit Dhimmi, Aardata, etc.)
During the Six-Day War on June 6, 1967, Israel invaded and occupied the Golan
and with it the Shebaa Farms. UN resolution 242 issued by the Security Council
on November 22, 1967 after the war did not mention the Shebaa Farms as Lebanese
territory. It did, however, clearly state that all territories occupied by
Israel on the Syrian-Israeli front are Syrian territories. Lebanon was not a
participant to the war, and did not at the time claim in any official manner
that Israel had occupied part of its territory.
In 1972, Israel entered in some portions of the Israeli-Lebanese border fence,
but this entry was limited and did not go beyond the southern town of Houla.
When the 1973 war broke out between Israel and the Arabs, Lebanon did not
participate either, neither did it consider at the end of the war that Israel
occupied any of its territory. Resolution 338 of the Security Council dated
November 22, 1973 did not mention anything at all suggesting any occupied
Lebanese territory. Not one official in the Lebanese government at the time said
anything about Israel occupying a single inch of its territory, and Lebanon
remained officially bound by the 1949 Armistice Agreement.
In 1978, Israel entered the south of Lebanon on its "Operation Litani" campaign,
and on March 9, 1978, the Security Council issued resolution 425 and its
implementation mechanism in resolution 426. That resolution did not mention the
Shebaa Farms, and official Lebanon again never said anything in any
Lebanese, Arab, international or regional venue that Israel occupied the Shebaa
Farms. In fact, the concerned countries, namely Syria and Lebanon, all the
Arab countries and Israel did not consider that resolutions 242 and 338 pertain
in any way to Lebanese territory. Similarly, resolutions 425 and 426 did not
mention the Shebaa Farms and did not consider them as Lebanese territory that is
occupied by Israel.
In 1982, Israel invaded Lebanon and reached the capital Beirut. It then withdrew
to the south and remained there until May 2000. The Security Council
had issued on September 17,1982, resolution 520 that demands the withdrawal of
all foreign forces from all Lebanon, the respect for Lebanon's sovereignty and
internationally-recognized borders, and the spread of the authority of the
Lebanese State with its own national forces over its entire territory. This
resolution did not mention the Shebaa Farms since the UN believes the Farms
belong to Syrian territory covered by resolutions 425 and 338 which globally
apply to the Golan heights.
It is important to remember here that a resolution was adopted by the Lebanese
Parliament in 1991,which "requested that the government attend the Madrid
Conference on the basis of several principles, including the principle that
resolutions 242 and 338 do not pertain to Lebanon", but that the governments
that were formed after that parliament was dissolved and three
non-representative parliaments were set up officially linked the Lebanese cause
with the implementation of those two resolutions, thereby nullifying the Taef
Accord. In October 1991, and after the Gulf War, all Arab countries, as well as
Israel and Lebanon, participated at the Madrid Conference under American-Russian
sponsorship. Then the completely Syrian-occupied Lebanon of the Taef regime said
that resolutions 242 and 338 were immaterial to Lebanon and instead focused on
resolutions 425 and 426, demanding a return to a commitment to the Armistice
Agreement signed with Israel in 1949. Not one Arab country, and neither Israel
nor Syria pointed then to the Shebaa Farms as occupied Lebanese territory. The
same position was also adopted by Taef Lebanon and Baathist Syria in their
negotiations with Israel that took place in the US over several periods of time
between 1994 and 1996 during the Clinton administration. Nowhere in the minutes
and proceedings of these negotiations were the Shebaa Farms mentioned, while
Lebanon called for a return to the implementation of the Armistice Agreement
with Israel.
The Lebanese Foreign Minister again reiterated that it was not concerned by
resolutions 242 and 338, but only by resolution 425.
Ever since Israel occupied the Golan in 1967, and since the international
observers have been watching the Syrian-Israeli border, the Shebaa Farms have
always been considered as Syrian territories by the international community.
Several international maps place the Farms inside Syrian territory that is
occupied by Israel. Former Syrian president Amin Hafez mentions in his memoirs
(available on the Al-Jazeerah web site) that the regime of Hafez Assad had
delivered the Golan to Israel in exchange for maintaining him and his band
safely in power.
From all the preceding, it is clear that the Shebaa Farms question landed in
year 2000 on the Lebanese in a Syrian Baathist parachute, a poisoned gift such
as all the gifts the Baath offered the Lebanese. The Baath fabricated this story
to maintain its occupation of Lebanon and create an anomalous situation at the
Lebanese border with Israel that prevents the rise of the Lebanese State, and to
keep its control of the Lebanese scene, directly through its intelligence and
soldiers, and indirectly through Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and the rest of
the Lebanese and Palestinian organizations that are completely in its grip.
Syria was forced to leave Lebanon by the Lebanese people's "Cedars Revolution"
and by the 2004 UN Resolution 1559 that was strongly supported by the
international community.
Following the Israeli withdrawal of May 2000, the United Nations tasked its
delegates, with Lebanese and Israeli participation, with the mission of
delineating the border between Lebanon and Israel. The Blue Line was thus drawn
with the stipulation that the Shebaa Farms were located inside Syrian
territories. Lebanon and Syria, as well as Israel and all Arab countries
recognized the Blue Line as the official border.
Lebanon's recognition was double-sided. General Emile Lahoud, the Lebanese
President, sent a secret letter to the Secretary General of the UN Kofi Annan
without the knowledge of his Prime Minister Salim Hoss, in which he accepted the
Blue Line. Yet, publicly and in the media, the matter was presented as though
Lebanon refused to recognize the Blue Line before an Israeli withdrawal from the
Shebaa Farms.
The Lebanese media, towing the Syrian line, then began a campaign of inciting
the people in order to justify keeping weapons in the hands of Hezbollah and
preventing the Lebanese Army from deploying along the border with Israel and
entering the Palestinian camps, and basically prevent the Lebanese government
from spreading and exercising its authority over its entire territory.
The Lebanese South was to remain a time-bomb in the hands of the Syrian and
Iranian rulers under an upside-down argument that the Lebanese Army ought not to
be deployed to the Lebanese border with Israel so as not protect the Israeli
border! A sick and tragic logic that made Lebanon and those in its government
the laughing stock of the international community.
The UN tried to peacefully dismantle the Shebaa Farms time bomb through the
modalities of international law. It requested both the Lebanese and Syrian
governments submit official documents signed by both countries clearly stating
Syria's recognition of the Shebaa Farms as Lebanese land. However, Syria refused
to comply with this request, and instead had its Foreign Minister Farouq Sharaa
place an unofficial telephone call to the UN Secretary General Annan.
Annan reiterated his demand several times, but Syria ignored the request
while the rulers of the Lebanese puppet regime did not dare raise the issue with
the
Syrians. Instead, they persisted in their lies, their incitements and their
faithful execution of the Syrian dictates, all of this against the background of
the
Baathist slogan of "one-path, one-destiny".
In an interview with a French magazine, the Maronite Patriarch Sfeir said: "Some
tell us that Shebaa is Lebanese, and some tell us it is Syrian, and to this date
we have no information about any official Syrian document presented to the UN
that certifies Syria's recognition of the Lebanese identity of the Shebaa Farms.
We do not see how the Farms can be liberated by throwing stones across the Blue
Line between Israel and Lebanon, but by negotiating through the UN, especially
since the Secretary General, Washington, and the European countries have
acknowledged that Israel has implemented Resolution 425. The Farms, which were
under Syrian control when Israel occupied the Golan in 1967, are covered under
Resolution 242, and not Resolution 425."
To those who are concerned and have an open mind to understand the facts, we
simply say...Yes, the Shebaa Farms are 100% Lebanese land, but Syria seized them
by force and took control of them administratively and militarily from the early
1960s. In the process, it killed Lebanese gendarmes and shut down the Lebanese
police station there, which was tantamount to evicting the Lebanese authorities
from the Farms.
If the Syrian Baath regime indeed wanted to help recover the Shebaa Farms and
rid it of the Israeli occupation, it would have presented the official
documentation required by the UN and officially recognized the Lebanese identity
of the Farms. The UN in turn would guarantee the return of the Farms to
Lebanon without firing a single bullet. Israel has in fact expressed its
readiness to withdraw from the Farms the moment Syria formally recognizes
Lebanon's
sovereignty over the Farms and the Lebanese Army deploys on the border.
Syria never recognized Lebanon's right to exist as an independent country since
the borders of the State of Greater Lebanon were drawn in 1920, even as it
continued to speak about brotherhood, geography and history. Syria always and
categorically rejected the idea of establishing diplomatic relations with
Lebanon and it also refrained from undertaking any official assessment of the
borders between the two countries, consistent with its hidden ambition under the
slogans of "one people in two states", "the unity of geography and history",
"Lebanon is the 'soft flank' of Syria, "the unity of path and destiny", and
others.
If Hezbollah really wanted to liberate the Farms, it would have asked its
sponsors, the Syrian regime for the official document requested by the UN, it
would have surrendered its weapons to the Lebanese State, and would have allowed
the Lebanese Army to deploy along the border and spread the State's authority
over all Lebanese land. It also would have facilitated the implementation by the
State of its obligations under Resolution 426.
To Hezbollah and its Syrian-Iranian sponsors we say: Enough lying to your people
and to our people, take care of your own business and let the Lebanese people
handle their own affairs and live in peace.
*Elias Bejjani
Human Rights activist, journalist & political commentator.
Spokesman for the Canadian Lebanese Human Rights Federation (CLHRF)
Chairman for the Canadian Lebanese Coordinating Council (LCCC)
E.Mail phoenicia@hotmail.com
LCCC Web Site
http://www.10452lccc.com
CLHRF Website http://www.clhrf.com
N.B: The original
version of the above document was translated from Arabic by: Dr. Joseph Hitti
and was first published in 2004. This version has many changes and addition. Dr.
Joseph Hitti edited this version too.