LCCC NEWS
BULLETIN
MARCH 14/2006
Below news from
miscellaneous sources for 14/03/06
Roads Closed on Lebanon Border Following Terror Alert-Arutz
Sheva
As Syria's Influence in Lebanon Wanes, Iran Moves In-New
York Times
Syria arrests dissidents on anniversary of clashes-Khaleej
Times
Group tied to Qaida has post near Lebanese border-Ha'aretz
Lebanon talks resume but breakthrough hopes dim-Reuters.uk - UK
IDF on high alert in north-Ynetnews
Below News from the
Daily Star for 14/03/06
Politicians agree on 'good relations' with Syria
Israel claims Hizbullah planning attacks, announces state of alert
Election law committee fails to resolve sectarian-division hurdle
Shebaa Farms residents insist they are Lebanese
Sfeir asks electoral law committee members to try again
Labor minister promises to safeguard NSSF reform
Russia sees no need for Syria to face sanctions
Yet more bones found left behind at Anjar mass graves
Detainee supporters see Hizbullah as best hope
Israel claims Hizbullah planning attacks, announces state of alert
Salloukh: Expatriates 'pillars of country'
A postcard from the edge of a bomb site
Fneish promotes use of solar energy
Time for Arabs to get off the bench and play the Washington game
Them and us.By Nahla
Atiyah
Yet more bones found left behind
at Anjar mass graves
By Rym Ghazal -Daily Star staff
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
BEIRUT: The mass graves unearthed in Anjar are to be officially sealed off as
new reports made it to the media Monday that a Belgian delegation found
uncollected bones during a visit to the graves. The announcement came following
a report in An-Nahar Monday that a Belgian delegation found bones from a "a foot
and a hand" almost three months after the completion of the official exhumation
and collection of the bones. "The graves will be off limits to everyone, except
the team commissioned by the government to investigate the mass graves," said
the prosecutor general responsible for the case, Abdullah Bitar, to The Daily
Star. "There are not supposed to be there any bones left behind. There is even a
special officer assigned to the site whose job is to make sure the bones have
been collected and keep me updated on what is happening there," said Bitar.
Bitar launched an investigation into the case of the uncollected bones, after
the initial discovery by The Daily Star of bones carelessly left behind, just a
week after the exhumation process was officially completed by the Lebanese
authorities.
"This is absolutely ridiculous and there is total incompetence somewhere," he
said, adding that "my officer suggested that perhaps a dog or some animal
brought in the bones as the site is completely unguarded."
A report was released in An-Nahar Monday about another mass grave, the one
unearthed in November at the Defense Ministry in Yarze. The report said that
half of the 20 bodies exhumed at Yarze belong to Lebanese Army soldiers.
The newspaper quoted Brigadier Nabil Kara, the head of an army commission
investigating the graves, as saying that DNA testing of the bodies has revealed
the identity of 10 soldiers.
Kara refrained from releasing the names of the dead until their relatives are
officially notified next week.
However, he said that seven of the soldiers died on October 13, 1990, the date
of a Syrian military offensive against then army commander General Michel Aoun
who was waging a "War of Liberation" against Syria's domination of Lebanon. The
three others died in 1984 in Al-Shahar al-Gharbi in Mount Lebanon during the
Druze-Christian war, Kara added.
Kara said the identified bodies at Yarze were in army uniform. He said the other
remains, which may include civilians, will be returned to the ministry graveyard
and documents related to these cases will be preserved in the military archives.
DNA analyses have been making headlines for the past few months, with a new DNA
police laboratory opening in Lebanon and the discovery of the remains of Michel
Seurat, a French researcher kidnapped in Lebanon back in 1985, through DNA tests
carried out in France after his remains were unearthed by construction workers
digging at a rest stop on the airport road. - With Naharnet
Politicians agree on 'good relations' with Syria
Decisions include need to demarcate borders but fail to resolve Shebaa farms
dispute
By Nada Bakri and Nafez Qawas -Daily Star staff
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Lebanese national Dialogue round 2 - Day 1
BEIRUT: As Lebanon's second round of dialogue kicked off Monday, the country's
political elite agreed on the first day to establish "good relations" with
Syria, according to MP Hagop Pakradonian. Speaking to The Daily Star,
Pakradonian declined to say whether that meant establishing diplomatic relations
with Damascus, merely saying: "Participants vowed to establish good relations."
Pakradonian added that "the atmosphere is very positive and all participants are
communicating with each other very calmly and rationally including [Progressive
Socialist Party leader Walid] Jumblatt and [Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan]
Nasrallah."
But, political sources close to the talks told The Daily Star that participants
"agreed in the first session to follow up on the demarcation of the
Syrian-Lebanese borders, establish diplomatic relations, reject all forms of
tutelage and follow up on the Lebanese detainees in Syrian jails."
The sources added that the politicians have agreed on the disarmament of
Palestinian factions outside refugee camps and on regulating Palestinian arms
inside these camps. The second session also revolved around the controversial
identity of the Shebaa Farms. Pakradonian said that each participant expressed
his views and opinions regarding this issue but that no final decision was taken
yet. Parliamentary majority leader Saad Hariri told The Daily Star that
participants will adopt Lebanese maps when discussing the identity of the farms.
Hariri held a tete-a-tete with Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea at the end of
the second section.
Jumblatt, however, has repeatedly said that these maps were forged in 2001 to
indicate the Farms are located inside the Lebanese borders, thus giving
Hizbullah an alibi to keep its arms. The Chouf MP was seen walking into the
talks followed by an escort carrying a large map of Lebanon. After the session,
as he left, he appeared visibly annoyed.
But Pakradonian said these were maps showing Syrian mobile network antennas
positioned to relay signals from Syrian mobile sim cards used within Lebanese
territory, effectively infringing on Lebanese government revenue.
Speculations erupted that the chances to reach a common stance on thorny issues
including the fate of pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud and the arms of
Hizbullah are slim after Speaker Nabih Berri - the official spokesperson of the
conference - refused to brief journalists on the outcome of the talks.
However a participant who wished to remain anonymous told Agence France Press
that leaders "calmly discussed the need to draw the borders between Lebanon and
Syria, particularly with regard to the Shebaa Farms, by appealing to the United
Nations."Another politician who wished to remain unidentified also told AFP that
"the question of the Shebaa Farms is linked to the drawing of Lebanese-Syrian
borders and consequently to Hizbullah's arms."
"By establishing that these 'Farms' are indeed Lebanese, an armed Hizbullah
fighting to recover them would then be legitimate," the source added. Although
the presidential issue was not discussed, Geagea said this matter "cannot
tolerate any delay."
"We hope that it is resolved at the dialogue table or else we will continue [to
push for the ousting of Lahoud] with all available means," said Geagea following
the first session. The dialogue kicked off on March 2 but was adjourned a few
days later after Jumblatt attacked Lahoud and Hizbullah from Washington. But
Berri said the time-out was aimed at holding further consultations and
discussions before taking final decisions.
"It must succeed and we should use all our capabilities to avoid failure and
this is everyone's responsibility. This conference presents a precious
opportunity for national salvation," Berri told As-Safir newspaper.
The newspaper also reported that participants have drafted a text during the
first round of the talks concerning the disarmament of Palestinian factions
outside refugee camps and enforcing regulations with regards to holding arms
inside the camps.
The report added that politicians have even agreed to claim the Lebanese
identity of the Shebaa Farms before the talks were adjourned. But the majority
of politicians opposed Berri's decision to announce reaching these positions,
insisting that the presidency issue be resolved before any announcements.
Political sources said that if participants fail to reach an agreement, the
speaker will refrain from holding press conferences and will instead adjourn the
talks to give some space for further side discussions until all issues are
resolved. The sources added that follow-up committees might be created to hold
discussions and call to resume talks when final agreements are reached.
Also in comments to As-Safir newspaper, Premier Fouad Siniora said the dispute
over the Shebaa Farms' identity can only be solved through Syria's cooperation
with Lebanon and arbitration by the United Nations. "Political declarations and
goodwill gestures are not enough. There should be joint steps and this is what
the meeting today will decide on," As-Safir quoted Siniora as saying. This comes
at a time when various politicians and businessmen warned a failure in the
dialogue would lead to an economic and social crisis. "The economy has suffered
a lot and any delay will compound the problems. If we did not agree today we
will agree in days, weeks or months, but every delay will increase the cost to
Lebanon and to the Lebanese," said Siniora.
Israel claims Hizbullah planning attacks, announces
state of alert
Mofaz: it's an attempt to deflect attention from Syria
By Mohammed Zaatari -Daily Star staff
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
SOUTH LEBANON: The Israeli Army announced a state of high alert on the Lebanese
borders on Sunday, claiming new fears of an attack by Hizbullah. Israeli Defense
Minister Shaul Mofaz said Monday Israel has heightened an alert along its border
with Lebanon based on intelligence reports that Hizbullah is planning to carry
out attacks.
"Hizbullah, with Syria's backing, intends to carry out attacks against Israel in
an effort to deflect world attention away from Syria as the United Nations
investigates allegations that it was behind the murder of former Lebanese Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri, Mofaz told Israel TV. "We have intelligence that is
well-founded enough that they are intending to escalate the situation even as
far as kidnapping Israeli soldiers," Mofaz said. The kidnapping of Israeli
soldiers has always been an expressed goal of the resistance. Israeli Senior
Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad said "chances of a Hizbullah offensive were
higher at the moment because of the Jewish Purim holiday starting Monday night,
general elections in two weeks and possibly the interests of Hizbullah patron,
Iran, subject of a UN Security Council debate over its nuclear program,
scheduled for Monday."
"It could be to serve Iran by diverting attention from the growing international
pressure," Gilad told an Israeli radio channel.
Israeli radio and television channels reported that the army "had gone on the
maximum state of alert" to thwart any new offensive across the border ahead of
the Israeli legislative elections on March 28.
A report published Monday on the Web site of the Israeli Haaretz newspaper said:
"The Israeli Defense Forces went on high alert on Sunday evening along the
northern border with Lebanon due to warnings of a possible Hizbullah attack."
"The decision was made following a meeting held by the Israeli Northern Command.
The [Israeli Army] Spokesman said Israel sees the Lebanese government as
responsible for all hostile activity along the border," it continued.
"The last time such a step was taken, in November 2005, the raised alert did not
deter Hizbullah from attempting to carry out a cross-border attack," it added.
The Israeli Army also closed roads running parallel to the border and farmers
have been told not to head to adjoining fields, the Israeli state television
said. A spokesman for the UN Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL), Milos Strugar,
told reporters that the situation was "tense along the Blue Line."
He added that UNIFIL was in contact with all the concerned parties and had asked
them for "restraint." The Daily Star toured several border towns, where citizens
said they noted a minor Israeli activity across the border.
While dozens of Israeli and Asian farmers were working in orchards 100 meters
away of the Lebanese borders, Israeli police vehicles were hiding behind the
trees and inspecting the borders through binoculars.When some reporters tried to
photograph the farmers, they took refuge in the orchards. A Lebanese worker in
the town of Adayseh facing the Marghalyoun settlement said none of the settlers
showed up during the day, "because maybe they were afraid."
UNIFIL's Indian battalion also circulated patrols to inspect the borders.
Loyalty to the Resistance MP Pierre Sarhal said Israel was trying to "affect the
Lebanese national dialogue by threatening the resistance," adding that the
Israeli measures might represent "a cover for attacks Israel was planning to
carry out against Lebanon."While he stressed "the resistance's right to defend
its people," Sarhal said the Lebanese people "will face all who are looking to
strike at the country's security and stability."
Israel claims Hizbullah planning attacks, announces state of alert
Mofaz: it's an attempt to deflect attention from Syria
By Mohammed Zaatari -Daily Star staff
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
SOUTH LEBANON: The Israeli Army announced a state of high alert on the Lebanese
borders on Sunday, claiming new fears of an attack by Hizbullah. Israeli Defense
Minister Shaul Mofaz said Monday Israel has heightened an alert along its border
with Lebanon based on intelligence reports that Hizbullah is planning to carry
out attacks. "Hizbullah, with Syria's backing, intends to carry out attacks
against Israel in an effort to deflect world attention away from Syria as the
United Nations investigates allegations that it was behind the murder of former
Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, Mofaz told Israel TV.
"We have intelligence that is well-founded enough that they are intending to
escalate the situation even as far as kidnapping Israeli soldiers," Mofaz said.
The kidnapping of Israeli soldiers has always been an expressed goal of the
resistance.
Israeli Senior Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad said "chances of a Hizbullah
offensive were higher at the moment because of the Jewish Purim holiday starting
Monday night, general elections in two weeks and possibly the interests of
Hizbullah patron, Iran, subject of a UN Security Council debate over its nuclear
program, scheduled for Monday."
"It could be to serve Iran by diverting attention from the growing international
pressure," Gilad told an Israeli radio channel.
Israeli radio and television channels reported that the army "had gone on the
maximum state of alert" to thwart any new offensive across the border ahead of
the Israeli legislative elections on March 28. A report published Monday on the
Web site of the Israeli Haaretz newspaper said: "The Israeli Defense Forces went
on high alert on Sunday evening along the northern border with Lebanon due to
warnings of a possible Hizbullah attack."
"The decision was made following a meeting held by the Israeli Northern Command.
The [Israeli Army] Spokesman said Israel sees the Lebanese government as
responsible for all hostile activity along the border," it continued.
"The last time such a step was taken, in November 2005, the raised alert did not
deter Hizbullah from attempting to carry out a cross-border attack," it added.
The Israeli Army also closed roads running parallel to the border and farmers
have been told not to head to adjoining fields, the Israeli state television
said. A spokesman for the UN Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL), Milos Strugar,
told reporters that the situation was "tense along the Blue Line."
He added that UNIFIL was in contact with all the concerned parties and had asked
them for "restraint." The Daily Star toured several border towns, where citizens
said they noted a minor Israeli activity across the border. While dozens of
Israeli and Asian farmers were working in orchards 100 meters away of the
Lebanese borders, Israeli police vehicles were hiding behind the trees and
inspecting the borders through binoculars. When some reporters tried to
photograph the farmers, they took refuge in the orchards. A Lebanese worker in
the town of Adayseh facing the Marghalyoun settlement said none of the settlers
showed up during the day, "because maybe they were afraid." UNIFIL's Indian
battalion also circulated patrols to inspect the borders.Loyalty to the
Resistance MP Pierre Sarhal said Israel was trying to "affect the Lebanese
national dialogue by threatening the resistance," adding that the Israeli
measures might represent "a cover for attacks Israel was planning to carry out
against Lebanon."While he stressed "the resistance's right to defend its
people," Sarhal said the Lebanese people "will face all who are looking to
strike at the country's security and stability."
Israel claims Hizbullah planning attacks, announces
state of alert
Mofaz: it's an attempt to deflect attention from Syria
By Mohammed Zaatari -Daily Star staff- Tuesday, March 14,
2006
SOUTH LEBANON: The Israeli Army announced a state of high alert on the Lebanese
borders on Sunday, claiming new fears of an attack by Hizbullah. Israeli Defense
Minister Shaul Mofaz said Monday Israel has heightened an alert along its border
with Lebanon based on intelligence reports that Hizbullah is planning to carry
out attacks.
"Hizbullah, with Syria's backing, intends to carry out attacks against Israel in
an effort to deflect world attention away from Syria as the United Nations
investigates allegations that it was behind the murder of former Lebanese Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri, Mofaz told Israel TV. "We have intelligence that is
well-founded enough that they are intending to escalate the situation even as
far as kidnapping Israeli soldiers," Mofaz said. The kidnapping of Israeli
soldiers has always been an expressed goal of the resistance. Israeli Senior
Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad said "chances of a Hizbullah offensive were
higher at the moment because of the Jewish Purim holiday starting Monday night,
general elections in two weeks and possibly the interests of Hizbullah patron,
Iran, subject of a UN Security Council debate over its nuclear program,
scheduled for Monday."
"It could be to serve Iran by diverting attention from the growing international
pressure," Gilad told an Israeli radio channel.
Israeli radio and television channels reported that the army "had gone on the
maximum state of alert" to thwart any new offensive across the border ahead of
the Israeli legislative elections on March 28.
A report published Monday on the Web site of the Israeli Haaretz newspaper said:
"The Israeli Defense Forces went on high alert on Sunday evening along the
northern border with Lebanon due to warnings of a possible Hizbullah attack."
"The decision was made following a meeting held by the Israeli Northern Command.
The [Israeli Army] Spokesman said Israel sees the Lebanese government as
responsible for all hostile activity along the border," it continued. "The last
time such a step was taken, in November 2005, the raised alert did not deter
Hizbullah from attempting to carry out a cross-border attack," it added.
The Israeli Army also closed roads running parallel to the border and farmers
have been told not to head to adjoining fields, the Israeli state television
said. A spokesman for the UN Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL), Milos Strugar,
told reporters that the situation was "tense along the Blue Line."
He added that UNIFIL was in contact with all the concerned parties and had asked
them for "restraint." The Daily Star toured several border towns, where citizens
said they noted a minor Israeli activity across the border. While dozens of
Israeli and Asian farmers were working in orchards 100 meters away of the
Lebanese borders, Israeli police vehicles were hiding behind the trees and
inspecting the borders through binoculars. When some reporters tried to
photograph the farmers, they took refuge in the orchards. A Lebanese worker in
the town of Adayseh facing the Marghalyoun settlement said none of the settlers
showed up during the day, "because maybe they were afraid."UNIFIL's Indian
battalion also circulated patrols to inspect the borders. Loyalty to the
Resistance MP Pierre Sarhal said Israel was trying to "affect the Lebanese
national dialogue by threatening the resistance," adding that the Israeli
measures might represent "a cover for attacks Israel was planning to carry out
against Lebanon."While he stressed "the resistance's right to defend its
people," Sarhal said the Lebanese people "will face all who are looking to
strike at the country's security and stability."
Sfeir asks electoral law committee members to try again
By Maroun Khoury -Daily Star correspondent
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
BKIRKI: The Maronite League voiced its concern at the work of the committee in
charge of drafting a new electoral law, and urged committee members to abide by
the Constitution, "which stipulates that Muslims and Christians should have
equal representation, in line with the National Accord."In a statement issued
Monday, the league said Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Butros Sfeir hoped "the new
electoral law will divide districts in a way that promotes coexistence and
guarantees fair representation of all factions."The league urged Michel Tabet
and Ziad Baroud, who withdrew last week, "to return to the committee." President
of the National Commission for Drafting a New Eectoral Law and former minister
Fouad Butros was surprised at claims that some members in the Reform and Change
bloc believe that Syria wants to regain control over the new parliamentary
electoral law. He said: "As history can tell, no one controlled me during the
past 40 years, neither Syria nor any other party."Butros was speaking on Monday
following a meeting with Sfeir. He said that the commission has completed
80percent of drafting the new law "but there remains one or two points related
to some districts." Butros said that he will hold a press conference next week
to explain details about all what has been happening lately with the commission.
Reform and Change MP Walid Khoury had earlier voiced his bloc's disappointment
at the work of the committee, adding: "Such divisions of electoral districts are
very dangerous and remind us of Syrian tutelage over the elections." Speaking
following his meeting with the prelate, Khoury stressed the committee should
present one draft law instead of several, adding that the new law should fairly
represent all Lebanese factions.
Detainee supporters see Hizbullah as best hope
By Rym Ghazal -aily Star staff
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
BEIRUT: The families of those detained and unaccounted for in Israeli prisons
protested on Monday as a show of support for "the resistance," sending a message
to "some of the politicians" in the national dialogue who are pushing for the
disarmament of Hizbullah. "Without the resistance, any hope for the release of
our detainees will be lost forever," said Bassam Kantar, the brother of Samir
Kantar, who has been held in an Israeli prison for almost 27 years - longer than
any other Lebanese detainee - and who is known as the "dean" of the detainees.
"We heard that Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea has asked to look over the
file of those detained in Israel ... which is truly strange coming from him,"
said Kantar who, along with about 30 protesters, demonstrated near the United
Nations building Monday. The building is the site of a long-term sit-in by
family and friends of inmates detained in Syrian prisons.
"Did he destroy the hundreds of files of those missing and kidnapped at the War
Council, where he himself handed over to Israel some those detained now?" Kantar
said.
The other politician criticized by the protesters was Progressive Socialist
Party leader Walid Jumblatt, who announced last month that the disputed Shebaa
Farms was Syrian and displayed to the media a Lebanese army map from 1962
illustrating the point. "We condemn the latest statements of Walid Jumblatt in
Washington, where he said Lebanon can't remain tied to the cause of those
detained in Israel, thereby sacrificing the detainees," said Kantar.
Samir Kantar, Naseem Nasr, Yehya Sakaf, Mohammed Fran, Ibrahim Zin al-Deen,
Mohammed Hawa and Rachid Najim were some of the detainees listed by Kantar whom
he said Jumblatt "would be sacrificing."
"If your sons were detained, would you give up on them?" he said. Kantar
revealed that he will be going again to the Human Rights Commission next week to
lobby for the detainees' case. "If the government puts some weight behind me,
the case of the detainees could be finally resolved," he said. "My brother's
fate will never be made known without the help of Hizbullah, and the same will
be the case for other detainees, as Israel will never just give them up."Israel
has said that it would not release Kantar before it received information about
Ron Arad, an Israeli air force navigator who went missing after his plane was
shot down over Lebanon in 1986. His fate remains unknown.
Israel claims Hizbullah planning attacks, announces
state of alert
Mofaz: it's an attempt to deflect attention from Syria
By Mohammed Zaatari -Daily Star staff
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
SOUTH LEBANON: The Israeli Army announced a state of high alert on the Lebanese
borders on Sunday, claiming new fears of an attack by Hizbullah. Israeli Defense
Minister Shaul Mofaz said Monday Israel has heightened an alert along its border
with Lebanon based on intelligence reports that Hizbullah is planning to carry
out attacks.
"Hizbullah, with Syria's backing, intends to carry out attacks against Israel in
an effort to deflect world attention away from Syria as the United Nations
investigates allegations that it was behind the murder of former Lebanese Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri, Mofaz told Israel TV. "We have intelligence that is
well-founded enough that they are intending to escalate the situation even as
far as kidnapping Israeli soldiers," Mofaz said. The kidnapping of Israeli
soldiers has always been an expressed goal of the resistance. Israeli Senior
Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad said "chances of a Hizbullah offensive were
higher at the moment because of the Jewish Purim holiday starting Monday night,
general elections in two weeks and possibly the interests of Hizbullah patron,
Iran, subject of a UN Security Council debate over its nuclear program,
scheduled for Monday."
"It could be to serve Iran by diverting attention from the growing international
pressure," Gilad told an Israeli radio channel.
Israeli radio and television channels reported that the army "had gone on the
maximum state of alert" to thwart any new offensive across the border ahead of
the Israeli legislative elections on March 28. A report published Monday on the
Web site of the Israeli Haaretz newspaper said: "The Israeli Defense Forces went
on high alert on Sunday evening along the northern border with Lebanon due to
warnings of a possible Hizbullah attack."
"The decision was made following a meeting held by the Israeli Northern Command.
The [Israeli Army] Spokesman said Israel sees the Lebanese government as
responsible for all hostile activity along the border," it continued.
"The last time such a step was taken, in November 2005, the raised alert did not
deter Hizbullah from attempting to carry out a cross-border attack," it added.
The Israeli Army also closed roads running parallel to the border and farmers
have been told not to head to adjoining fields, the Israeli state television
said. A spokesman for the UN Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL), Milos Strugar,
told reporters that the situation was "tense along the Blue Line."
He added that UNIFIL was in contact with all the concerned parties and had asked
them for "restraint." The Daily Star toured several border towns, where citizens
said they noted a minor Israeli activity across the border.
While dozens of Israeli and Asian farmers were working in orchards 100 meters
away of the Lebanese borders, Israeli police vehicles were hiding behind the
trees and inspecting the borders through binoculars. When some reporters tried
to photograph the farmers, they took refuge in the orchards. A Lebanese worker
in the town of Adayseh facing the Marghalyoun settlement said none of the
settlers showed up during the day, "because maybe they were afraid."
UNIFIL's Indian battalion also circulated patrols to inspect the borders.
Loyalty to the Resistance MP Pierre Sarhal said Israel was trying to "affect the
Lebanese national dialogue by threatening the resistance," adding that the
Israeli measures might represent "a cover for attacks Israel was planning to
carry out against Lebanon."
While he stressed "the resistance's right to defend its people," Sarhal said the
Lebanese people "will face all who are looking to strike at the country's
security and stability."
Time for Arabs to get off the bench and play the
Washington game
Tuesday, March 14, 2006- Editorial- Daily Star
Many people in the Arab world are still struggling to understand how a sealed
deal for Dubai Ports World to take over operations of U.S. ports was suddenly
scuppered in its final stages. The U.A.E.'s Central Bank governor complained
that the deal had been defeated because its opponents had "mixed economic and
investment matters" with "politics." But this revelation should hardly come as a
surprise. If there is any place where reason is distorted by the lens of
politics it is Washington's Capitol Hill. Lawmakers who supported the deal have
attributed its failure to lack of knowledge about the agreement. Indeed,
politicians are often less informed than we would like them to be. This is one
of the reasons that special-interest groups invest so much time and money in
educating (i.e. lobbying) members of Congress about issues of concern. The most
powerful foreign policy lobby in the United States, the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee, better known by its acronym AIPAC, has been actively
educating U.S. congressmen since 1954. According to AIPAC's Web site, the group
holds over 2,000 meetings with members of Congress and helps pass more than 100
pro-Israel legislative initiatives each year. Through its efforts, AIPAC helped
build a case for the war on Iraq and is now actively shaping U.S. foreign policy
on the Palestinian Authority, Syria and Iran. AIPAC has been so effective in
garnering congressional support for Israel that no congressman would dare to
deliver a public speech criticizing the country, in the way senators and
representatives lined up to bash the Dubai ports deal. Perhaps if the Arabs had
a powerful lobby, Senator Frank Lautenberg, for example, would have hesitated
before comparing the government of Dubai to the Devil, as he did during a recent
campaign rally.
What's even more noteworthy is that AIPAC manages to protect Israeli interests
on an annual budget of just $33.4 million. This amount of money is a drop in the
bucket for Arab investors, considering that the Dubai ports deal alone was
valued at $6.85 billion. It is easy to imagine how the Dubai Ports World deal
could have turned out differently if Arabs had a strong lobby to protect their
interests. Although there are a few worthwhile fledgling organizations trying to
fill this void, the reality on the ground in Washington is that Arabs, through
their absence, have failed to protect their interests and have given other
groups a free hand in influencing U.S. lawmaking. The result, as we have seen,
has often been unfair or unbalanced policy.
Nobody said that the rules that govern the game of politics in Washington are
fair. But Arabs do have a choice: either continue to sit on the bench, or go out
and compete with the players who are currently dominating the game.
Them and us
By Nahla Atiyah
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
As nahla sees it A car mechanic recently thanked the authorities for leaving
gaping holes and mighty bumps on the road. He says it feeds his modest repair
business and helps him make ends meet.His refreshing frankness raises more
questions than it answers. Why is he so needy and why are the roads so
neglected?Why do we allow ourselves to be so abused?
Our politicians shy away from talking about what really matters, and the gap
deepens between them and us.
Our tired cars crawl in thick traffic along ugly over-flies with puddles of
stagnant grey water underneath and twisted dusty-caked iron rods dangling from
above. One car per passenger for wont of public transport, and all comes to a
halt on a rainy day. Petrol prices soar, sparking a migration to more lethal
substitutes playing havoc with our frail, limp, scanty lungs.
Relentless power cuts fatally jolt our fridges, freezers, TVs and Hi-Fi's, and
seals in our acute psychosis as we're caught unawares in narrow confined lifts
with uncomfortable strangers. We all know a positive attitude is the only thing
that pulls you out of all sorts of adversity. But it's a real challenge to stay
positive at the edge of darkness, awfully lonely before our leaders' muted
response. Watch their impressive cars gingerly defying our snail-paced crawl.
Thick hairy intimidating arms stick out of accompanying vehicles,
unceremoniously waving us sideways to secure open passage. Think of their petrol
bills, more likely footed by some official department or perk. And their
comfortable metropolitan Beirut homes, electricity shining round the clock. And
today, listen to them pontificating on the etymology of this or that word,
marking their territory and, in the process, paralyzing us with a sentence. I
thought all this would be a serious setback, but in fact it helped. It made me
want to step into an altogether new sphere, exploring alternatives.
Friend for President
So I went looking. For someone younger, sprightlier. One
who'd appreciate the different cultures of his country and is able to secure for
it positive coverage worldwide. One who's opposed to injustice and oppression
and sectarianism.
And I found him- a literae humaniores, fluent in no less than 7 languages, with
working knowledge of Persian, Russian, Latin, Japanese and more. To his credit,
over 20 published books ("publish or perish", said academia), and spirited
lectures and addresses to distinguished audiences from the world's highest
platforms.
A Maronite- an authority on Islamic law, he's the recipient of many awards and
accolades, deeply involved here and abroad with issues on human rights, crimes
against humanity, the democratic process and the rule of law.
His website shows him a smiling family man with son in tow. Nonchalantly
stylish, his indomitable Einstein mane now neatly trimmed to better suit his new
public persona. But I was met with a muted reception. Friends questioned his
capacity to muster elusive pragmatic solutions. For all his concerned
citizenship, could he meander through the realities of the local scene and
survive? Not creative enough, was the verdict. This threw me. Couldn't a man of
culture be also streetwise, able to say anything to anyone? A social engineer
with moral worth, a brain box feeling for the grassroots while propelling us to
economic stardom. This, to me, must be the prerequisite for leadership. Unless
we're talking polemics. Them and us in happy rebounds. And we'll keep keeping
on, energizer bunnies flipping along, no matter what happens.Nahla Atiyah, WFA's
vice president, is adviser on corporate affairs, could be reached at:
asnahlaseesit@yahoo.com
US sanctions on Syria politically motivated: minister
By Khaled Yacoub Oweis
Monday, March 13, DAMASCUS (Reuters) - Syria's finance minister on Monday
dismissed U.S. sanctions against the country's largest bank, tightened last
week, as politically motivated and without financial justification.
Mohammad al-Hussein told reporters that Damascus would continue with financial
sector reform that is attracting foreign investment despite Washington's latest
move.
Weekly Roundup
The week's events from around the world, captured in pictures.The United States on Thursday told U.S. financial institutions to terminate all
correspondent accounts involving the Commercial Bank of Syria and its Syrian
Lebanese Commercial Bank subsidiary.
Almost two years earlier, it had designated Commercial Bank of Syria, which
handles 70 percent of the country's foreign currency transfers, a "primary
money-laundering concern" and sought to bar its access to the U.S. banking
system.
"The background and motives are political without any financial reasons. Let
them face us if they have them," Hussein said at the opening of an Islamic
banking conference.
"We in Syria affirm that this decision and its timing are fundamentally
political. We will continue opening up our banking sector, proving that economic
reform is an internal issue we are intent on pursuing," Hussein said.
In a move to safeguard Syrian assets and ensure currency flows, the Syrian
government switched all its foreign currency dealings from dollars to euros last
month. The Commercial Bank of Syria also switched its dealings to euros.
PRIORITIES
Although banking relations with U.S. banks have suffered, Hussein said European
banks have continued to deal with Syria and the country's foreign transfers were
proceeding smoothly, helped by the entry of foreign banks into Syria two years
ago.
Hussein said amendments were being made to legislation that opened the financial
sector after decades of state control to overcome any hurdles slowing down the
expansion of banks and foreign investment.
Islamic banking and insurance laws passed last year have already attracted
international interest and several foreign banks and insurance companies
operating on Islamic principles are planning to open in Syrian this year, the
minister said.
"The Syrian government is fully convinced that banking, insurance and investment
have the priority. We have already become on par with the region as far as
legislation is concerned, although more steps need to be taken," he said.
Arab bankers say Syria, which is also facing international pressure over its
role in Lebanon, has coped well with the U.S. sanctions and pressure by western
powers, having stabilized the currency as it came under pressure last year.
Heavyweight regional banks, such as Arab Bank and Banque Audi, have proceeded
with expansion plans in Syria despite the U.S. sanctions, attracted by a country
without a private banking sector for the last four decades.
Like the rest of the economy, the banks have been operating amid uncertainty,
with a U.N. investigation implicating Syrian officials in the assassination of
former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri a year ago.
The U.N. Security Council has threatened unspecified action against Syria if it
is found uncooperative with the inquiry.
A regional banker, who declined to be named, said sanctions on the scale imposed
on Iraq from 1990-2003 would be almost impossible for the economy and banking
system to survive.
"One cannot dismiss sanctions that could hit trade," the banker said. "However
unlikely, an embargo of this magnitude contributes to uncertainty in the short
term."
As Syria's Influence in Lebanon Wanes, Iran Moves In
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN-New York Times
Published: March 13, 2006
BEIRUT, Lebanon, March 6 — Nearly a year ago, not long after the assassination
of Rafik Hariri, who was twice prime minister of Lebanon, Syrian troops withdrew
from Lebanon, unleashing a wave of patriotism here that prompted many to say
that the Lebanese might finally be able to take control of their destiny.
But the intensity of the moment and the rush of emotions eclipsed at least one
important and largely unanswerable question: With Syria gone, or at least its
troops gone, who would fill the power vacuum?
At the time, Iran did not appear to be the answer. But that is what is
happening, according to government officials, political leaders and political
analysts here.
Iran, long a powerful player in Lebanon, has been able to increase its
influence, partly through its ties to the Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah. That
has given Tehran a stronger hand to play in its confrontation with the United
States and Europe over its nuclear program.
Should the nuclear showdown go badly for Iran, the government could rely on its
surrogates in Lebanon as well as its influence in Iraq, or use oil for a weapon.
In Lebanon, the Iranians could contribute to the kind of retribution they have
promised as a payback, from a strike across the border into Israel, to a more
forceful flexing that could paralyze the Lebanese government, political analysts
and government officials said.
While Iran helped create, finance and train Hezbollah, it was Syria that settled
scores and managed relations between Shiite factions and Palestinians throughout
Lebanon. Syria was a filter between Tehran and Hezbollah, and now that Syria has
been uprooted, Iran and Hezbollah can work much more closely.
Members of Hezbollah have become members of the government for the first time,
magnifying the importance of the ties between Iran and the Lebanese Shiite
movement.
That is the downside for the United States, and for Lebanon as well, officials
here said. Unity remains elusive as Lebanon continues to be a playing field for
foreign interests.
"There is without any doubt a growing Iranian influence not only in Lebanon but
in the whole region," said Nassib Lahoud, a Maronite Christian who is a former
ambassador to the United States and a legislator. "We are trying to build normal
relations with everyone, and we refuse to turn Lebanon into a battlefield for
regional and international powers."
Political leaders met here recently for what was billed as the start of a
national dialogue, a chance to try to resolve long-simmering disputes. There was
to be discussion about disarming militias like Hezbollah and figuring out what
to do about President Émile Lahoud, a staunch ally of Syria, who has clung to
his office even as his ability to govern has withered under pressure to resign.
But even before the meetings began, government officials conceded that Lebanon's
ability to resolve some of its most vexing domestic conflicts would depend on
decisions made in Tehran and Washington.
Charles Rizk, Lebanon's minister of justice, said that as Iran's and Hezbollah's
influence grew in Lebanon, the country's hopes for unity hinged on whether Iran
and the United States would at least agree to talk to each other. It is an idea,
officials here acknowledge, that appears as remote as a Syria-Israel peace deal.
But as a nation unusually susceptible to outside influences, officials said,
that is Lebanon's reality.
"I hope that by America inaugurating a process of détente with Iran, this will
reverberate into more consensus in Lebanon," Mr. Rizk said. "This is the only
chance for us to solve our problems."
For years, Iran had been a kind of second lieutenant to Syria, important,
influential and spiritually linked to the Hezbollah militia in a way that the
Alawite leadership of Syria never could have been.
But with Syrian troops dug in, and Syrian intelligence agents running the show,
Tehran's role was often more behind the scenes. In the 1980's, during the
Lebanese civil war, Syria established its dominant position when it brokered a
deal between the Shiite militias, Amal and Hezbollah, and settled the feuds in
the Palestinian camps. After that, Iran found itself one step removed from the
surrogates it helped create.
Then, suddenly, Syria found itself in retreat.
Iran saw an opportunity and began to press ahead with its established
relationships in Lebanon, and with trying to build new ones. Lebanese officials
and academics and religious leaders were increasingly feeling the generosity of
the Iranian state, officials said, with invitations to conferences in Iran and
offers of aid.
Forum: The Middle East
Lebanese officials say that Iran has been careful not to appear heavy-handed, so
as not to alienate Sunni, Druse and Christian factions. After years under the
fist of Damascus, many people here said that Iranian power was preferable
because of geography — Tehran is far away — and because the Iranians appeared to
be more intent on winning allegiances, not forcing them.
"Iran is omnipresent in Lebanon, not only with Hezbollah," said Ridwan al-Sayyid,
an adviser to the prime minister and a professor of Islamic studies at Lebanese
University. "They are strong, not like Syria, but they shape their presence in
different ways. They are helping many, many organizations — Sunnis, Shias and
Christians. They are benevolent."
This is not the first time that the United States has seen Iran benefit, however
unintentionally, from events that were initially regarded as strengthening the
Bush administration's hand. With each American military strike in the region,
first against the Taliban in Afghanistan and then against Saddam Hussein in
Iraq, Iran has found its influence in the region grow as its enemies have been
defeated by American military might, political analysts said.
"Iran now has many more cards in confronting the United States than the United
States has in confronting Iran," said Hassan Nafaa, a professor of political
science at Cairo University.
Now it appears that Syria's withdrawal from Lebanon increases the Iranian
mullah's influence. A recent political alliance between Hezbollah and Gen.
Michel Aoun, leader of the largest Christian bloc in Parliament, was viewed by
one political analyst with close ties to the government as a "tactical victory"
for Iran.
"It's because Syria has been deflated very much, Iran is rising as a force," Mr.
Rizk said.
Ahmed Fatfat, the acting interior minister, said, "I believe that Iran's role in
Lebanon has become stronger, and if you look at its relationship with Hezbollah
it is stronger."
What this means, officials said, is that as long as the United States and Iran
are at odds Lebanon will remain, at best, in limbo. Lebanon will be unable to
resolve its own domestic problems while Iran continues to try to build up its
strategic position.
"If there is an Iranian-American clash, it will be played out here," Mr. Fatfat
said.
Syria arrests dissidents on anniversary of clashes
(AFP)13 March 2006
DAMASCUS — Security forces yesterday arrested a former opposition MP and several
Kurdish demonstrators who were marking the second anniversary of deadly clashes
in northern Syria, human rights advocates said.
Riad Seif was detained along with at least five members of the Kurdish
Democratic Progressive Party during a sit-in near a Damascus government
building, said a statement by the Syrian Organisation for Human Rights.
Security forces beat and then detained some of the demonstrators, after three of
those taking part in the sit-in attempted to deliver a message to Prime Minister
Naji Otri, said human rights lawyer Anwar Bunni, adding that several
demonstrators had been wounded.The Syrian Organisation for Human Rights also
said some demonstrators had been wounded by the security forces.
Group tied to Al-Qaida holds position near Lebanese border
By Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondent 13/03/06
Usbat-al-Ansar, the Lebanon-based Palestinian organization that maintains close
ties with some of the Al-Qaida networks, has a front-line command post
relatively close to the border with Israel, in the Ain el Helweh refugee camp.
According to reports over the weekend, the Lebanese army arrested, in various
locations around the country, eight members of a terrorist group. Half are
Palestinians, and the other half are Lebanese. Security sources in Lebanon said
that the members of the network are believed to be responsible for the most
recent round of Katyusha rocket fire on the Galilee last December.
Following the rocket fire, Al-Qaida in Iraq, headed by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi,
published an announcement in which it claimed responsibility for the action. It
was the first time an organization affiliated with Al-Qaida had taken
responsibility for a direct attack on Israel.
Immediately after the Katyusha fire, Israel had only partial intelligence with
regard to those responsible for the attack. In response, the Israel Air Force
bombed a base belonging to Ahmed Jibril's Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine - General Command, and it was subsequently claimed that members of
Usbat al-Ansar had trained at the base and had received instruction from PFLP-GC
activists.
Meanwhile, it emerged that the organization has a command post in the Ain el
Helweh refugee camp also. This command post has not been attacked on the grounds
that it lies in a densely populated area and that bombing it is likely to lead
to numerous civilian casualties.
Israeli security sources say that the Usbat al-Ansar members are Palestinians
who initiated ties with al-Zarqawi's activists in order to receive assistance.
Israeli officials are concerned about the trend, over the past year, of the
operations of various networks identified with Al-Qaida moving westward - to
Lebanon, Jordan and Sinai. The officials believe that this trend will gradually
manifest itself in more attempted terror attacks against Israel also.
Lebanon talks resume but breakthrough hopes dim
Mon Mar 13, 2006
By Nadim Ladki-BEIRUT (Reuters) - Rival politicians resumed on Monday talks
aimed at ending Lebanon's political crisis, with leaders warning failure to
resolve contentious issues would damage an ailing economy and worsen divisions.
Political sources said chances were very slim the leaders would agree on two key
issues: disarming Hizbollah guerrillas and the fate of the pro-Syrian president,
while some progress was possible in bridging some other differences.
The "national dialogue conference", the largest top-level political gathering
since the end of Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, was adjourned abruptly on March
7 after a row over fiery comments made by an anti-Syrian leader on a visit to
Washington.
But the breathing space appeared to have done little to end sharp differences
between pro- and anti- Syrian politicians despite warnings that failure could
plunge the country deeper into political and economic crises.
"It must succeed and we should use all our capabilities to avoid failure... This
conference presents a precious opportunity for national salvation," Parliament
Speaker Nabih Berri, an ally of Syria who called the talks, told as-Safir
newspaper.
Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, a member of the majority anti-Syrian coalition,
warned the country's economy could not tolerate many more setbacks.
"The economy has suffered a lot and any delay will add to the problems...,"
Siniora said. "If we did not agree today we will agree in days, weeks or months,
but every delay will increase the cost for Lebanon and the Lebanese."
Lebanon is grappling with a public debt of more than $36 billion (20.85 billion
pounds)-- nearly double its gross domestic product. It is banking on an aid
conference in Beirut later this year to ease the debt burden and kickstart the
economy.
Security was tight around the parliament in central Beirut where the talks were
being held.
The killing of ex-Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri 13 months ago has plunged
Lebanon into a political crisis. Mass protests blaming Syria for the murder
forced Damascus to bow to international pressure and quit Lebanon two months
later. A wave of bombings and assassinations has since raised fears the country
was sliding into chaos.
THORNY ISSUES
The fate of President Emile Lahoud is among the thorniest issues at the
roundtable talks; he is under pressure from anti-Syrian politicians to resign
but has vowed to see out his term, extended for three years in 2004 under Syrian
pressure.
Even more contentious is a U.N. Security Council resolution demanding the
pro-Syrian Hizbollah disarm. Some Lebanese believe the Shi'ite group should lay
down its guns and stick to politics but others see it as legitimate armed
resistance to Israel.
The talks appeared to be on the verge of collapse after anti-Syrian Druze leader
Walid Jumblatt called from Washington for Hizbollah to be disarmed.
The comments prompted Hizbollah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah to walk out of the
talks in protest. But Nasrallah, along with Jumblatt and other top leaders,
Christian and Muslim, returned to the talks on schedule.
Hizbollah's guerrilla attacks were instrumental in ending Israel's 22-year
occupation of southern Lebanon in 2000. Hizbollah says it has the right to keep
its arms, partly to liberate the Shebaa Farms, an Israeli-occupied border
territory.
The group says the area is Lebanese, but the U.N. maintains it is Syrian, unless
Beirut and Damascus amend their border, and that the Israeli withdrawal from
south Lebanon is complete.
Lebanese leaders are expected to agree on Lebanon's claim to the Shebaa Farms,
which would go some way to legitimating Hizbollah's arms, but they remain split
on whether the tiny strip should be liberated by force or through diplomacy.
IDF on high alert in north
Farmers working near border fence forbidden to go to work
Monday due to fear of terror attacks, kidnappings by Hizbullah; army expected to
maintain high alert until after elections
The IDF's alert level along the northern border reached a high Monday morning
for fear of escalation on the part of Hizbullah. Farmers working near the border
fence were forbidden to leave for work for fear of confrontations with the
terror organization's members stationed not far from the fence.
Four road sections along the border with Lebanon were closed to traffic by the
army and police.
The decision to raise the alert level of security forces deployed along the
border was made at the end of a meeting between security and intelligence
officials at the Northern Command.
Terror warnings ahead of Purim / Efrat Weiss
Police place thousands of officers in city centers, Northern Command warns of
Hizbullah attacks in north; firefighters ask public to be careful from
firecrackers
Full story
A large number of security vehicles patrolled the closed road sections Monday.
However, residents of the northern communities continued to live their lives as
usual.
The high alert is expected to be maintained until Election Day, in about two
weeks. Senior army officials expressed their fear that Hizbullah, supported by
Syria or Iran, would try to escalate the situation at the border.
There is currently a large number of security warnings on the terror
organization's attempts to kidnap soldiers stationed along the border, as well
as to fire toward the posts.
Security coordinators at the communities bordering the fence have already been
briefed on how their communities should function in case of an infiltration
attempt or fire from Lebanon.
'Beirut responsible for any escalation'
Four years have passed since the terror attack at the Metzuba junction in the
western Galilee, in which five civilians and one soldier were killed. Two
terrorist had crossed the border fence from Lebanon to Israel near Kibbutz
Hanita using a ladder. They stood on a hill overlooking the Kibbutz Metzuba
junction and opened fire at vehicles.
The terrorist were killed following a difficult battle against IDF soldiers who
were deployed to the area.
Since the incident, the army has boosted its use of technological means along
the border fence, as well as motorized and infantry patrols of the area in an
attempt to prevent a recurrence of similar infiltration incidents.
"The Lebanese government must understand that any attempt to hurt IDF soldiers
are Israeli citizens touring or living near the border would be appropriately
retaliated by us. The responsibility for any escalation lies with the Beirut
government, which has to understand that it is time to apply its sovereignty
also on the south of the state," an IDF officer said.
An army source added that "Israeli residents can come and safely spend time at
the north, and we on our part will provide them, as well as the residents living
along the border, with the possibility to maintain a routine life.
Interview: The Hezbollah and Lebanon's future
By Shinkichi Suzuki and Hind el Hallage
Special to World Peace Herald
Published March 10, 2006
CAIRO -- Lebanese Druze leader Waleed Jumblatt recently called for the
disarmament of Hezbollah's military wing and the election of a president who was
not "a puppet like [current President Emil] Lahoud." The Lebanese political
scene has begun to change as different Lebanese factions call on Hezbollah to
dismantle its arms.
In his interview for World Peace Herald, Gamal A. Gawad Soltan, professor of
Syria-Lebanon studies of the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies
(ACPSS), provides a political analysis of the current situation in Lebanon. He
looks at Hezbollah, Saad Hariri [son of the assassinated former prime minister],
Jumblatt, and Christian opposition leader, General Michel Aoun.
Q: Democracy cannot function if any one organization has excessive power.
Hezbollah still maintains its arms. Is there any possibility that Hezbollah will
disarm? What do Hariri or Aoun think about Hezbollah?
A: To begin with, Hezbollah will not disarm by any means in the near future.
This is the main issue that is dividing Lebanon now. You have the following
configuration of power in Lebanon: the Shiites, Hezbollah, and the [Christian]
Amal movement on the one hand, and other figures on the other.
These other figures are very concerned that Hezbollah has its own militia, and
that it is even stronger than the Lebanese army. They feel that is not fair,
because they all had to disarm after the civil war. Yet, it was only Hezbollah
who was allowed to keep its arms. This was justified for years as Hezbollah has
represented itself as a resistance movement that struggles against Israeli
occupation in Lebanon
Yet, after the Israeli withdrawal, this justification no longer works. This is
why the different factions are now exercising pressure on Hezbollah to disarm.
As for its own ideology regarding its current situation, Hezbollah believes that
one day there will be another struggle against Israel. Hezbollah expects future
attacks from the Israelis. Thus, Hezbollah has not given up the idea of being a
part of revolutionary forces that still fight to eliminate the Zionist power in
the region.
To justify its maintenance of military arms after the Israeli withdrawal,
Hezbollah invented the 'Shebaa Farms' issue as a pretext. Shebaa is an
agricultural area consisting of 14 farms that was occupied by Israel in 1967.
There is an ongoing debate in Lebanon as to whether Shebaa belongs to Lebanon or
Syria.
Both Hezbollah and Amal claim that Shebaa is a part of Lebanon and that Israel
has therefore not fully withdrawn from Lebanon. They believe that there had been
an agreement with Syria to put its security forces in the territory. The main
task of these forces was to prevent smuggling along the border between Lebanon
and Syria. According to this interpretation, when the Golan Heights was occupied
in 1967, Israel considered Shebaa a part of Syria, although it was and is
Lebanese territory.
However, the United Nations considers Shebaa a part of Syria, and has therefore
determined that Israel has withdrawn completely from Lebanon.
It is clear that this debate will never end. The opponents of Hezbollah think
that Shebaa is a part of Syria and not Lebanese territory. In their view, as
Lebanon is no longer occupied, there is no need for an armed militias, and they
call on Hezbollah to disarm.
For Hezbollah disarmament depends on "the liberation of the Shebaa Farms, the
release of Lebanese held in Israeli prisons, and the defense of Lebanon from
Israeli threats."
However, Security Council resolution 1559 calls for the elimination of all
militias and allows the Lebanese army to take control over all Lebanese
territory. An agreement between the different Lebanese factions was reached
after the last Lebanese elections to dismantle Hezbollah's arms. However, they
have not been able to implement this since Hezbollah is now a part of the
government and participates in governmental meetings and activities.
Lebanese factions realize that they cannot really force Hezbollah to disarm.
Otherwise, they risk a new civil war in Lebanon. As a result, many non-Shiites
in Lebanon, particularly the Druze and the Maronite Christians, are very
concerned about their security and have began to rearm, which is a very serious
business and a risky situation,
There is still broad agreement among all forces in Lebanon about Hezbollah. Most
Maronites (who support Samir Geagea, commander of the dissolved Christian
militia group Lebanese Forces), the Lebanese Forces, and the Qornet Shahwan
center-right Christian coalition, advocate a realignment of Lebanon with the
West. Maronites are anti-Syrians and pro-Western. On the other hand, Sunnis, as
well as Saad Hariri, stand for limiting Syrian influence in Lebanon as well as
eliminating Lebanon-Syria ties. All forces stand in a united national front
against Hezbollah.
As for tackling the Druze situation, to understand the Lebanese political scene,
we have to keep in mind the demography. The Druze is a very small ethnic group
that lives essentially in Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine. Unlike other groups, it
does not have a foreign source to provide it with security or support. Thus, to
a great extent, the Druze feel isolated. This can explain the strong position
taken by Waleed Jumblatt against Hezbollah and his desire to establish strong
relations with the United States.
No one can exclude the possibility of another civil war in Lebanon. That is why
each group is now working to ensure its future status and powers, seeking
support in the event of civil war. In Lebanon, it is always a "balance of power
game" between the different groups. Even in peaceful times, we can see some
factions who are trying to gain power over the situation. Lebanese politics are
all about different groups who try to weaken each other.
Michel Aoun aims at taking over the leadership of the Lebanese government. He is
such a well-known and respected figure among Lebanese, particularly Christians.
He had considerable gains in the last elections.
Any significant numbers except within Hezbollah and the Shiites does, not
support the current pro-Syrian president Emile Lahoud. He is supported by
neither the Christians nor the Lebanese Forces. That is how Michel Aoun got his
chance. Aoun has good relations with Hezbollah. Recently, he held a meeting with
Lebanon's Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. All forces accept
him because of the strong position he used to take against Syria. He was the one
who fought against the Syrians in 1990 and was forced to go into exile in France
for 15 years.
Therefore, Aoun has his own credentials as anti-Syrian. He is viewed as a real
Lebanese nationalist who is concerned about Lebanon's independence. At the same
time, Hezbollah accepts him on condition that he allows them to maintain their
own militia or replenish their arms. In addition, Aoun assures the Lebanese
public that while allowing Hezbollah to keep arms, he will be a strong
independent president, and not a Syrian puppet. This is the complicated game of
factional politics takes place in Lebanon.
Q: What is Saad Hariri's policy? Is he pro-West or pro-Iran or on the Arab
League side? What are his plans for the future?
A: As for Saad Hariri's true intentions, he plans to win full independence from
Syrian control. In Lebanon, all Sunnis in general are looking forward to get out
from under Syrian control, yet without turning against it. This is in contrast
to the Maronites and Lebanese forces' attitude towards Syria. They are willing
to turn against Syria at any moment. The Sunnis and Saad Hariri want only to
limit Syrian influence and regain Lebanon's independence. Putting Lebanon in the
mainstream of Arab politics is Saad Hariri's current vision for Lebanon. As for
the current situation, everyone is divided over Hezbollah. Saad Hariri, Waleed
Jumblatt and Samir Geagea are all getting together against Hezbollah. Once this
issue is over or settled, the regional situation will start to change.
Q: What is the relationship between Syrian intelligence and Hezbollah? Which one
is behind the terrorism that took place after the killing of Lebanon's former
Prime Minister Rafik Hariri?
A: The relationship between Syrian intelligence and Hezbollah is very strong.
Syria provides Hezbollah with military equipment. Regarding terrorism, Hezbollah
is not involved. Syrian intelligence is behind it. Hezbollah is an ideological
organization. Terrorism is not a part of its ideology. Hezbollah is trying to
gain its own credibility as anti-Israel and anti-American party. It tries not to
get involved in Lebanese politics. Since it was established, Hezbollah has not
participated in any struggle with another faction, with a few minor exceptions.
That is because it is directed mainly against Israel. Staying aside during
Lebanon's civil war, Hezbollah was able to enhance its credibility as a
resistance, and not a militia. With regard to Syria, it has a large network of
secret intelligence agents in Lebanon after running the country for years. Thus,
it uses this network to commit terror attacks. There is no sign that Hezbollah
is involved in such attacks