LCCC NEWS
BULLETINS
FEBRUARY 8/2006
Below News From
Miscellaneous Sources for 8.2.06
Lebanon
arrests five for army barracks attack-Reuters 8.2.06
March 14 Alliance Accuses Syria of Plotting to Ignite Iraq-Like Civil Strife in
Lebanon-Naharnet
Below News from the Daily Star for 8/2/06
Franjieh slams Al-Qaeda training charges
Fatfat: ISF lacks men and equipment to face riots
Dakkash visits Jumblatt to garner further support
Ministry looking into international court options
Hamas victory won't affect UNRWA's work
Former minister charges government with complicity in weekend riots
Watt praises response of officials and clerics to riots
FPM-Hizbullah understanding fails to draw reaction from March 14 Forces
Riot fears may stifle turnout at Hariri commemoration
Nasrallah and Aoun show that a little bit of work
makes a world of difference
A Hamas victory and the lessons to be learned-By
Bouthaina Shaaban
Nasrallah and Aoun show that a little bit of work
makes a world of difference
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
Editorial-Daily Star
On Monday, while Lebanon's March 14 Forces were busy huddling among themselves
in Beirut, a groundbreaking meeting, which saw two ideologically different
parties reaching out to one another, was taking place in a small church in the
southern suburbs of the city. Hizbullah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah and Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun were holding their
first-ever meeting at the Mar Mikhail Church in Shiyah. After hours of
negotiation, the two parties issued a joint statement in which they proposed
solutions to a number of extremely sensitive issues. They agreed, among other
things, that Hizbullah should have the right to bear arms as long as there is
occupied Lebanese territory, and that both parties will work to free Lebanese
detainees from Syrian prisons and to allow the return of former South Lebanese
Army members from exile in Israel.
The meeting marked a dramatic departure from the norm in Lebanese politics: Two
unallied political parties actually met face to face, put shoulder to wheel and,
through their efforts, were able to reach agreement on thorny issues. Indeed,
the landmark meeting came only after both parties had done a considerable amount
of homework, involving a lengthy series of preparatory meetings between their
representatives. Although one can disagree with or criticize the content of
their accord, one cannot dispute the fact that the two parties did their
homework and that their agreements were born out of good old-fashioned effort.
If only Lebanon's formal government institutions operated in a similar manner.
Ironically, on the same day that Aoun and Nasrallah were holding their landmark
meeting, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri was talking about dialogue in
Parliament. Berri convened a seminar on "The Role of Parliaments in National
Dialogue," in which the speaker praised the positive role that parliaments can
play in promoting public discussion. Citing formerly conflict-ridden countries
such as Sierra Leone, Argentina, Chile, Rwanda, Kosovo and Northern Ireland,
Berri said that in many states parliaments have have been an instrumental force
in promoting national reconciliation.
Berri has already put forth an initiative to start a national dialogue in
Lebanon's Parliament. But while there has been much talk of holding a national
dialogue, there has been little effort to actually start one. And while Berri,
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, Future Movement leader Saad Hariri and
others have been busy talking about dialogue, Nasrallah and Aoun have actually
achieved it.
A Hamas victory and the lessons to be learned
West should acknowledge legitimate win
By Bouthaina Shaaban -Wednesday, February 08, 2006
I tried to imagine how the European and American public would feel about Hamas
winning the elections. International politics and media have always pictured
Hamas as a "terrorist movement"; not a very surprising stigma, given its
animosity for the state of Israel.
As soon as the election results became public, the majority of American and
European officials seemed oblivious of their own preaching about "democracy,"
"independence" and "freedom" in the Middle East. They immediately indulged in a
series of threats starting with cutting off "aid" to the Palestinian people.
How could anyone who wakes up to the morning news in a Western democracy
understand this paradox between the "international will" and the "will of the
people"? The victory of Hamas is only one example of the historic relationship
between the West and the Arab people. It is living proof of the confused Western
policies toward the Arab-Israeli conflict and the Israeli occupation of Arab
lands.
The American and European threats that preceded Hamas' participation in the
Palestinian elections are based on a preconceived perception of Hamas as
threatening to the security of Israel. In reality, it is Israel, the only
nuclear state in the Middle East, who undercuts any shape of Palestinian
security on a daily basis.
Israel occupies Palestinian and Arab lands. Israel terrorizes Palestinians on a
daily basis. Israel, unquestioned, regularly assassinates Palestinian political
leaders, men, women and children, on basis of suspicion. Israel demolishes
Palestinian houses, displaces Palestinians and confiscates their lands as suits
its interests. Yet, the West calls Hamas a "terrorist movement."
For long decades, Israeli aggression has gone unchecked, financed by the West
and supported by Western silence. Since 1967, Israel has displaced millions of
Palestinians and appropriated the most fertile lands in the West Bank. The
ideological state of Israel denies Palestinians their most basic human rights.
Palestinians can't even pray at Al-Aqsa if Israel decides they should not. Yet,
both the United States and Europe accuse Hamas of extremism.
After Hamas' overwhelming victory, the American and European leaders embarked on
a daily preaching for the group unconditionally to renounce "violence" and
"disarm." It might be enlightening to remember that the IRA ceased armed
resistance only after an agreement was reached and not before.
It is quite puzzling that the democracy sought by the West in the Middle East is
conditional. It is only the kind of democracy that brings to power like
elements. And even then, the Oslo Palestinian participants were deemed to be
"cooperating" only as long as they continued to meet Western and Israeli
demands; otherwise they were threatened with isolation.
It is not news to talk about the century-old Western politics in the Middle East
based on conceit and self-serving understanding. For decades the West has been
supporting oppressors and dictators who do not represent the public will, as
long as these despots safeguarded Western interests. This is a very important
trait in the West-Arab relations that undermines peace, freedom and democracy.
One of the lessons learned from the victory of Hamas is that the West does not
want the Palestinians to "democratically" express their will. Queuing for the
camera next to the voting boxes is "democracy" only so long as the polls anoint
the party previously chosen by the Israeli state.
Another lesson is a Western fallback into a total media blackout about the
"democratic process" that brought Hamas to power. No one talks any longer about
the "open and competitive" election process, described by Veronik Di Caiser,
head of the European election observing team. No one mentions how the elections
were carried out "freely and correctly" in spite of the "harsh restrictions
imposed by Israel."
Another lesson to remember is what ex-president Jimmy Carter himself said in a
press conference. The party listed as terrorist by Americans and Europeans
actually "runs" local politics "well," Carter said. Furthermore, it is "not
involved in any form of corruption."
The most important lesson we can learn from the Hamas victory is that the West's
biased policies are doomed to failure. Those labeled by the West as terrorist
movements happen to represent the public longing for freedom, peace and
democracy. This Western denial of true peace and democracy based on
international legitimacy and the public will can only serve to prolong the cycle
of violence the West claims to oppose.
Such erroneous American diplomacy campaigns in the Arab and Muslim world is
futile. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's decision to increase the number of
American diplomats in Asia and make them more "proactive" than conventional is
only reminiscent of their colonizing predecessors. The only way toward enduring
"peace" and "democracy" is through just solutions that acknowledge the rights of
the people.
Franjieh slams Al-Qaeda training charges
By Nada Bakri -Special to The Daily Star
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
BEIRUT: Former Interior Minister Suleiman Franjieh dismissed allegations by the
March 14 Forces that he is sponsoring military training camps for Al-Qaeda in
the North, countering with his own accusations the coalition had organized and
financed Sunday's riots in the capital. In a news conference held Tuesday,
Franjieh asked the government for an investigation into Sunday's riots and
defied politicians to call for a financial investigation into the near $40
billion debt accumulated since 1990.
"We ask the government to investigate Sunday's riots. They can accuse us of
training Marada Party members, but Al-Qaeda members, that is very ironic.
However, we put ourselves in the hands of the Judiciary that they appointed and
let them investigate the issue." The Marada Party is headed by Franjieh. "We ask
the parliamentary committees formed by the parliamentary majority to investigate
the issue and let's see where the alleged 1,000 Al-Qaeda members we are training
are, and why they weren't arrested yet," he said.
Franjieh added that the March 14 Forces were responsible for Sunday's riots and
had provided demonstrators with transportation to the rally.
"On Sunday morning they kept repeating on different television channels these
protesters belong to the March 14 camp and that they should not be attacked by
security forces, and in the afternoon they changed their story, saying these
protesters are Syrians or belong to the Salafi organization," Franjieh added.
The Salafi group is a radical Islamist organization. Franjieh further described
anti-Syrian politicians who held a meeting on Monday at the Clemenceau residence
of MP Walid Jumblatt, who was not present for the meeting, as the "leftovers of
March 14," and the March 14 forces as "tools who were rejected by their people
and do not exist in the political scene from our point of view."
He also accused Tripoli MP Bassem Jisr of handing FPM member Bassam Agha a
$130,000 check three days before the latter announced his resignation from the
party.
Franjieh later withdrew the charge after Jisr said the check had been forged and
the Judiciary is investigating the matter.
Asked to comment on the March 14 meeting that took place on Monday between
Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and FPM leader Michel Aoun, Franjieh
said: "The first meeting lacks respect, while the second was of a different and
higher level. Comparing the two meetings is like comparing [Lebanese pop singer]
Hayfa Wehbe to [Zghorta MP] Nayla Mouawad."
Franjieh, a former Zghorta MP, rejected accusations he and his allies were
attempting to overthrow the government, and accused Michel Mouawad, son of
Social Affairs Minister Nayla Mouawad, "of being a professio-nal in organizing
coups d'etat."Franjieh accused the young Mouwad of involvement in organizing a
coup d'etat against the president of Guinea Equator. Holding a news conference
of his own to address these accusations, Mouawad said the Syrian regime was
convinced it was necessary to eliminate him and his mother for Franjieh's
benefit. "The Syrian regime believes in the necessity of relieving Franjieh in
the North by liquidating us. If he is so sure of his leadership in the region,
why get rid of us?" he asked. Mouawad vowed to file a slander and libel lawsuit
against Franjieh for accusing him of involvement in toppling the Guinean
president. He further demanded Franjieh issue a public apology for the
accusation, saying the former minister had already sent delegates to apologize
for the "slip of tongue" in which he compared Mouawad to Wehbe. Mouawad added
Franjieh "received his manners from the Syrian intelligence services, which
explains his comments."
He further described Franjieh as a "leftover of the Syrian tutelage regime."
Dakkash visits Jumblatt to garner further support
By Maher Zeineddine -Daily Star correspondent
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
CHOUF: In his latest effort to secure his nomination as a "compromise candidate"
in the Baabda-Aley by-election, former MP Pierre Dakkash paid a visit to the
head of the Democratic Gathering, MP Walid Jumblatt Tuesday.
In comments made after his meeting with the Druze leader, Dakkash said: "[Jumblatt]
was responsive to the need to avoid an electoral battle, and he will discuss
with all the parties the means to reach a solution that suits the national
interest." Asked if he believed an accord would be reached despite the political
alliance announced Monday between Aoun and Hizbullah secretary general Sayyed
Hassan Nasrallah, the candidate said: "I am still very optimistic regarding the
elections, and I believe that my candidacy would spare conflicts between all the
parties, including the Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement.
"I hope that accord will be reached over my candidacy, but I will be satisfied
if the parties agree on someone else for the sake of Lebanon's interest."The
former MP ran an unsuccessful campaign in parliamentary elections held in May as
a candidate on Kesrouan MP Michel Aoun's list. Following the death of LF MP
Edmond Naim, two other candidates put themselves forward for Baabda-Aley's
Maronite seat, journalist May Chidiac and Dory Chamoun, the head of the National
Liberal Party, are both running as independents.
looking into international court options
Venue for hariri murder trial sought
By Leila Hatoum -Daily Star staff
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
BEIRUT: The Justice Ministry is presently considering the various available
options for the formation of an international court to try suspects in the
assassination of former Premier Rafik Hariri, according to Daily Star sources.
According to a judicial source, the Justice Ministry is working on several
drafts of the various models of such a tribunal, "which would be of an
international nature" and "based on the demand of the Justice Minister Charles
Rizk, and the Cabinet."The source added that "Lebanon is a concerned party in
the issue, which is why it is trying to have a say in what the tribunal would be
like."
The source also revealed that the ministry has "studied the forms of all the
various international tribunals formed to date."
The source further said that when the UN Undersecretary General for Legal
Affairs Nicolas Michel came to Lebanon, "he discussed the issue of the tribunal
with Rizk. So, as a ministry, instead of getting into future discussions without
any pre-plans, we are preparing a ready-made model."
"We will be ready to present our opinion in the matter of the forming of this
tribunal. We don't have a final opinion on the matter yet, and the final model
would be picked after our discussion with the UN," the source said.
Michel was in Lebanon two weeks ago to meet with the president, speaker, premier
and justice and foreign ministers in order to gather opinions and suggestions on
the nature of the special tribunal.Contacted on Tuesday at United Nations
headquarters in New York City, UN spokesperson Farhan Haq told The Daily Star
that Michel "is ready to come back to Lebanon to carry out further discussions
on the matter of the tribunal." However, Haq said there is no official date for
Michel's return to Beirut.
He also said that Michel "has actually been in touch with a wide range of
officials of various countries on this matter, and not only Lebanese
officials."The court is expected to be of an international nature and supported
by the UN.
"When you want to discuss the creation of such a special tribunal you have to
take into consideration four main steps," the judicial source explained. "The
first is the panel of judges and their nationality. Will they be Lebanese,
foreign, or mixed? "The second would be which law to apply. The Lebanese law as
the crime happened in Lebanon? A foreign law as some or all of the perpetrators
might be of foreign nationalities? "The third step is the procedures that the
tribunal would follow. Some tribunals would use their own procedures, or might
use the procedures of a certain country.
"The fourth step is discussing where this tribunal would be located, taking into
consideration the safety of its judges and that they are far from any sort of
external pressure; the cost of moving witnesses and suspects and so on.
"So if not in Lebanon where? In respect of this concept the Justice Ministry is
entrusted with coming up with the court's scenario. But it remains that the
final decision belongs to the UN and not us. But it will be taken in consensus."
Hamas victory won't affect UNRWA's work
By Mohammed Zaatari -Daily Star staff
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
TYRE: The UNRWA director in Lebanon, Richard Cook, said Tuesday that Hamas'
victory last month in legislative elections in Palestine will not affect the
nature of the agency's work. "Although we are following up on the developments,
we eiterate that our activities are purely humanitarian and there are no
political activities on the UNRWA's agenda," he added. Cook made the comment
during a visit to refugee camps in Tyre, where he inspected a number of clinics
and schools. Cook visited the Rashidieh refugee camp to inspect Al-Aqsa
Secondary School, before holding a meeting at the camp with Fatah's commander in
Lebanon, Brigadier Sultan Abu al-Aynayn.
Cook's visit is the first since Hamas' electoral victory, and since a series of
protests by Palestinian popular committees across southern refugee camps against
a number of UNRWA decisions. Palestinian refugees earlier this year staged
protests against a decision to cut medical coverage, although UNRWA maintains it
did not make any cuts.
Cook said the Lebanese government is cooperating positively with UNRWA and that
ongoing contacts with officials aim to settle refugee-related issues, including
permitting construction materials into the camps.
Cook promised to follow up on the issues until a "satisfactory result" was
reached. Commenting on the protests over alleged cuts to the refugees' medical
coverage, Cook said the issue was settled, explaining that "there are medical
cases requiring special care that is not available in hospitals across the area,
but in Beirut." Protestors had criticized the decision, arguing that Sidon
possesses the state-of-the-art Hammoud Hospital, which the refugees' said was
capable of providing treatment for complicated illnesses. The hospital used to
receive the highest percentage of Palestinians in Lebanon.
Regarding financial difficulties burdening the UNRWA, Cook said: "In the
beginning of every year we find ourselves struggling to cover the permanent and
continuous deficit in the agency's budget to implement and complete projects for
the refugees."He added: "So far, the agency managed to raise funds for these
projects, including a major educational project which will be financed by the
European Union and implemented within the three coming years."
Cook said other projects will be financed by the British and Japanese
governments.
FPM-Hizbullah understanding fails to draw reaction from March 14 Forces-March 8
camp comforted by 'long-awaited' move
By Adnan El-Ghoul Daily Star staff
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
BEIRUT: Monday's agreement between Hizbullah and the Free Patriotic Movement
failed to prompt much reaction from March 14 forces Tuesday, whereas "the
long-awaited move" comforted many parties within the March 8 camp, who believed
the agreement "marks the beginning of a new era in Lebanon's political life."In
comments on the Hizbullah-FPM "joint statement of understanding," March 14
politicians were contemplative and vague in assessing the new understanding. The
Executive Committee of the National Bloc Party issued a statement welcoming the
joint agreement, but at the same time criticized the document for "being unclear
regarding the stance on sovereignty."
"While speaking of protecting Lebanon's sovereignty, the agreement allows
Hizbullah to keep its own private army and decide on matters of peace and war
unilaterally," the statement said. Speaker Nabih Berri lauded the Aoun-Nasrallah
agreement, seeing in the meeting an example of how dialogue should proceed on
the national level. The speaker said he would be calling for the proposed
dialogue after the marking of the first commemoration of the killing of former
Premier Rafik Hariri on February14.
"If we want to reach concrete results in any dialogue, the top leaders must meet
and discuss the issues face to face," he said. Berri added that "second-line
representatives or third-line leaders" could not accomplish an agreement. "They
need months and probably more. Top leaders could accomplish the task within
weeks," he said. Echoing Nasrallah and Aoun's call on the government to resign,
many other parties said the Cabinet should be dissolved "if it admits its
failure to tackle sensitive national issues."
The National Bloc said the government must make "firm decisions or resign."
Meanwhile, the March 14 Forces gave the government one week to file a complaint
against Syria "for instigating violence and riots in Lebanon."
Many pro-Syrian forces feel the FPM-Hizbullah agreement will not only shake
Premier Fouad Siniora's Cabinet, but also topple the majority alliance. The
landmark meeting between Nasrallah and Aoun pleased many pro-Syrian parties,
such as former MP Talal Arslan's Lebanese Democratic Party and former Minister
Wiam Wahab, who saw in the agreement an indication of the "tumbling March 14
Forces and their schemes in the face of the rising alliance, which begins in
Palestine and ends in Iran, against the U.S.-Israeli alliance."
Former President Amin Gemayel said he was not surprised by the agreement.
"Michel Aoun and Nasrallah have been courting each other since the general's
return from Paris. The only exception was during the 2005 parliamentary
elections."
In principle, most national leaders welcome any rapprochement between Lebanon's
political parties. However, disagreements over several thorny issues remain at
the heart of the reservations regarding the agreement.
Gemayel said he welcomed Aoun's understanding with Nasrallah insofar as "what
serves Lebanese interests." The former president hoped the proposed national
dialogue would begin as soon as possible. However, Gemayel said the "March 14
Forces had disagreed with Aoun over many issues, particularly over his rejection
of the possibility of a Syrian involvement in Hariri's killing and in the
subsequent series of bombing and murder attempts." Gemayel further said he had
not found "anything new" in the joint statement. "The joint statement reflected
the Cabinet's Policy Statement, including the stance on the resistance's arms.
"Despite not introducing new elements to the agreement, Aoun chose to side with
Hizbullah and other pro-Syrian forces after he refused to respond to the
repeated calls from March 14 Forces to join them in their quest for freedom,
total independence and sovereignty."
At the same time, Gemayel said he would also call on Hizbullah and Amal to serve
the same national goals which all parties share. "For that purpose, we
encouraged the Hizbullah and Amal ministers to end their boycott and work with
the Cabinet. We will also invite them to participate in commemorating February
14." According to the former president, the ongoing political bickering was not
as harmful as many would like to believe, but was rather a tool to reach
national consensus on many issues. "The extreme exchanges between Hizbullah and
Walid Jumblatt were the only exception, while all other arguments had expressed
the difference of political views in a positive manner," Gemayel added. Former
Minister Joseph Hashem said the agreement had rekindled the hopes of the
Lebanese people because "it has incorporated all of the demands put forward by
the March 14 Forces."
Riot fears may stifle turnout at Hariri commemoration
Lebanese wary of repeat of Sunday's violent protests
By Raed El Rafei -Daily Star staff
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
BEIRUT: Following Sunday's violent riots, fears of a repeat of that scenario may
dissuade many Lebanese, especially Christians, from participating in the
gathering organized on February 14 on the first commemoration of former Premier
Rafik Hariri assassination. "I would never take part in demonstrations after
what happened on Sunday," said Najib Khalaf, one Beiruti citizen, who owns a
bookstore in Tabaris. On Sunday, a demonstration took place in front of the
Danish Consulate Tabaris, Ashrafieh, in protest against caricatures of the
Prophet Mohammad. the protest turned violent when some demonstrators started
attacking private properties and churches. Khalaf would not participate in the
demonstration because he "no longer trusted the government's ability to protect
its citizens." Joanna Nashef, an auditor, also said Sunday's riots left her with
"a fear of extremists striking again in other demonstrations." She said that
Sunday's violent images were "too fresh" for her to decide if taking part in the
commemoration of Hariri's assassination was a good idea. In fact, Chouf MP Walid
Jumblatt raised the question of whether "the aim of the intentional disturbances
on Sunday was to scare off Christians from taking part in February 14
gathering," in Tuesday's edition of Al-Mustaqbal local daily. Despite citizens'
fear, March 14 Forces continued mobilizing the street to participate in honoring
the memory of Hariri on February 14 in Martyrs' Square.
MP Boutros Harb said that he was calling on the Lebanese to take part massively
in the gathering in order to "pursue the march towards Lebanon's full
independence."
Harb said that Sunday's riots might have affected negatively Christians who were
planning on gathering in Martyrs' Square on February 14, adding that it created
"an atmosphere of apathy."
Blaming the riots partly on the lack of organization, he said there would be
full coordination between the organizers of the gathering and security forces
"in order to prevent any infiltrators from sabotaging the peaceful commemoration
of Hariri's killing."Nader Nakib, representative for the Future Youth Movement,
said the movement was visiting the houses of people whose properties were
damaged Sunday to voice their full solidarity.
"The infiltrators on Sunday were trying to break the image of a strong united
Lebanon and we would never allow this to happen," Nakib said, adding that the
February 14 gathering is for all Lebanese because what happened last year on
that day was "terrible" for everybody.
Regrading the participation of other political forces in the gathering, mainly
the Free Patriotic Movement and Hizbullah, Nakib said these forces have not
officially confirmed their participation yet but that "the atmosphere was
positive until now."A representative from the FPM student body, Roland Khoury,
said the party's leadership is going to take part in the gathering but there
won't be any calls for FPM supporters to participate. "We leave it to our
supporters to decide whether to participate or not," he said. Meanwhile, a
Hizbullah spokesperson said the party had yet to decide on whether to take part
in the February 14 gathering.
Watt praises response of officials and clerics to riots
Daily Star staff-Wednesday, February 08, 2006
BEIRUT: British Ambassador James Watt described Sunday's riots in Beirut as
"painful and heinous acts that were planned to undermine civil peace." Speaking
to reporters on Tuesday after meeting with Beirut Maronite Bishop Boulos Matar,
Watt applauded the "wise" and unwavering reaction of national politicians and
religious clerics, saying: "I am sure that dialogue between the Lebanese will
prevail over violence and fundamentalism." Watt also paid a visit to Grand Mufti
Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani. The ambassador said he told Qabbani that "true
national beliefs lie in tolerance and mutual respect between religions,
something we saw in the spiritual leaders and politicians of all Lebanese
confessions."
Watt praised Qabbani's stance, and insisted that "these events are not of the
Lebanese traditions and do not reflect the nature of the Lebanese." "The
Lebanese community knows how to deal with such events," he said. Meanwhile, the
Military Public Prosecutor's Office has received several files pertaining to
suspects arrested in the wake of Sunday's riots. The acting government delegate
to the Military Tribunal is expected to examine the files before launching legal
proceedings. - The Daily Star
Hamas victory won't affect UNRWA's work
By Mohammed Zaatari - Daily Star staff
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
TYRE: The UNRWA director in Lebanon, Richard Cook, said Tuesday that Hamas'
victory last month in legislative elections in Palestine will not affect the
nature of the agency's work. "Although we are following up on the developments,
we eiterate that our activities are purely humanitarian and there are no
political activities on the UNRWA's agenda," he added. Cook made the comment
during a visit to refugee camps in Tyre, where he inspected a number of clinics
and schools. Cook visited the Rashidieh refugee camp to inspect Al-Aqsa
Secondary School, before holding a meeting at the camp with Fatah's commander in
Lebanon, Brigadier Sultan Abu al-Aynayn.
Cook's visit is the first since Hamas' electoral victory, and since a series of
protests by Palestinian popular committees across southern refugee camps against
a number of UNRWA decisions. Palestinian refugees earlier this year staged
protests against a decision to cut medical coverage, although UNRWA maintains it
did not make any cuts.
Cook said the Lebanese government is cooperating positively with UNRWA and that
ongoing contacts with officials aim to settle refugee-related issues, including
permitting construction materials into the camps.
Cook promised to follow up on the issues until a "satisfactory result" was
reached. Commenting on the protests over alleged cuts to the refugees' medical
coverage, Cook said the issue was settled, explaining that "there are medical
cases requiring special care that is not available in hospitals across the area,
but in Beirut." Protestors had criticized the decision, arguing that Sidon
possesses the state-of-the-art Hammoud Hospital, which the refugees' said was
capable of providing treatment for complicated illnesses. The hospital used to
receive the highest percentage of Palestinians in Lebanon.
Regarding financial difficulties burdening the UNRWA, Cook said: "In the
beginning of every year we find ourselves struggling to cover the permanent and
continuous deficit in the agency's budget to implement and complete projects for
the refugees."
He added: "So far, the agency managed to raise funds for these projects,
including a major educational project which will be financed by the European
Union and implemented within the three coming years." Cook said other projects
will be financed by the British and Japanese governments.
Lebanon arrests five for army barracks attack
07 Feb 2006 15:58:07 GMT
By Alaa Shahine-BEIRUT, Feb 7 (Reuters) - Lebanon has arrested five men who
confessed they were behind a bomb attack at an army barracks in Beirut last
week, the acting interior minister said on Tuesday. The five, three Palestinians
and two Lebanese, also said they were responsible for attacks on army posts in
the south Lebanon city of Sidon, Ahmad Fattfat told a news conference. "A large
quantity of arms were also seized at a hideout in Sidon that belonged to this
group," he said. "Those people were not acting as individuals but as an
organisation," Fattfat added but declined to elaborate.
The blast outside the Fakhreddine Barracks in Beirut slightly wounded a soldier,
wrecked a car and smashed windows of nearby buildings. The bomb exploded shortly
after a local newspaper had received a call from someone claiming to speak on
behalf of al Qaeda and saying a security target in Beirut would be bombed in
retaliation for the arrest of 13 group members last month. Fattfat said
authorities were still questioning the 13 men -- seven Syrians, three Lebanese,
one Saudi, one Jordanian with Lebanese nationality and one Palestinian.
A military prosecutor charged them last month with planning to launch terrorist
attacks. Fattfat was named acting interior minister after the resignation of
Hassan al-Sabaa on Sunday hours after Muslim rioters torched a building housing
the Danish consulate to protest the publishing of Prophet Mohammad cartoons in
Europe.
Fattfat said preliminary investigations could not substantiate claims by the
country's main anti-Syrian coalition that Syrian forces and Jordanian and
Palestinian militants had infiltrated Lebanon to cause Sunday's riots.
Fattfat, a member of the same coalition, said the number of people arrested
after the riots, during which a church and private property at a Christian
district were also vandalised, rose to 416 suspects.
They were 223 Lebanese, 138 Syrians, 47 Palestinians, seven stateless people and
one Sudanese, he said, adding that all non-Lebanese who took part in the riots
were in the country legally. Lebanon has apologised to Denmark for the attack.
The coalition, which holds a majority in parliament and the government, said on
Monday Syrian officers led by military intelligence chief Asef Shawkat,
brother-in-law of President Bashar al-Assad, were behind the unrest.
Syria ended three decades of military presence in Lebanon in April after an
international and Lebanese outcry over the Feb. 14 assassination of former Prime
Minister Rafik al-Hariri. Many Lebanese blame Syria for the killing and a string
of ensuing bombings and assassinations. Damascus has strongly denied any role.
Italian FM: Syria did nothing to protect embassy
By ASSOCIATED PRESS-Feb. 7, 2006 3:02
Italian Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini accused Syria of not working
convincingly to block the assaults against Western embassies in that country and
denounced the nation as "a danger."
"I refuse to think that in a country like Syria, the assaults on the embassies
weren't in some way tolerated, or in any case, not blocked in any convincing
manner" by the authorities, Fini said on a talk show on state television late
Monday night.
On Saturday, the Danish and Norwegian embassies were burned in Syria as
protesters denounced publication in a Danish paper of 12 caricatures of the
Prophet Muhammad. "Syria objectively is a danger," Fini said. "Can one think
that the regime that militarily controls public opinion did not know about the
organization of the protests?" asked the minister, who leads a right-wing party
in Premier Silvio Berlusconi's government.
Iraqi General: Saddam Flew WMDs to Syria
Webcast News Service, 6 February 2006
Former Iraqi general Georges Sada, who served as second-in-command of the Iraqi
air force under deposed dictator Saddam Hussein, says Hussein moved weapons of
mass destruction into Syria before the US-led invasion by loading them into
civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed. The revelation is
made in the newly published book, Saddam's Secrets.
Speaking to The New York Sun, Sada reported that special Republican Guard units
led by Saddam's cousin, Ali Hussein al-Majid, nicknamed "Chemical Ali," loaded
"yellow barrels with skull and crossbones" in two Boeing jets. The planes made
56 flights to Syria in the weeks leading up to the war. Hussein also sent WMD
out on trucks.
"Saddam realized, this time, the Americans are coming," Sada said. "They handed
over the weapons of mass destruction to the Syrians." The revelation follows by
one month Israeli Gen. Moshe Yaalon's comments that Israel had intelligence
showing that Saddam "transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria."
The term "weapons of mass destruction" is used to describe nuclear, chemical,
and biological weapons. In the case of Iraq, Hussein was suspected of possessing
primarily chemical weapons, although the Iraqis were also working on developing
nuclear weapons. As part of the ceasefire in the 1991 Persian Gulf war, Hussein
agreed to get rid of his WMDs. However, Hussein's many "palaces" were off-limits
to U.N. weapons inspectors, and the dictator kicked the U.N. inspectors out of
Iraq in 1998.
A U.S.-led coalition occupied Iraq in 2003, in part because Hussein was
suspected of continuing to possess chemical weapons. However, no chemical
weapons have been found by the occupying forces.
On March 16, 1988, Hussein attacked the Iraqi Kurdish town of Halabjah with a
mix of mustard gas and nerve agents, killing 5,000 civilians, and wounding
10,000 more.
Syria, which shares a long border with Iraq, is ruled by the Baath party, as was
Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The Baath party was founded in 1945 as a radical,
left-wing, Arab nationalist party and came to power in both Syria and Iraq in
1963.
Syria's regime, headed by dictator Bashar Assad, has a long history of
supporting terrorist groups. Terrorist groups sponsored by Syria include Hamas,
the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine-General Command, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine. In addition, Assad has been accused of masterminding the
assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Sada's book also
says that on the eve of the first Gulf War, Saddam was planning to use his air
force to launch a chemical weapons attack on Israel.
Moqtada al-Sader on visit to Syria and Lebanon
Arabic Monitor: Damascus, 6 February - On a several days visit to Syria, the
Iraqi Shiite leader Moqtada al-Sader was officially received upon his arrival in
Damascus yesterday. He is reported to have visited a Shiite shrine in Syria and
met with Iraqi exilees. Interviewed by Al-Jazeera, Moqtada al-Sader said he
would consider particpation in the Iraqi government if this would contribute to
rid Iraq of the occupation forces. The visit to Syria will be followed by a
visit to Lebanon.
Grand Mufti of Syria expresses regret over assault on
Western embassies
Arabic Monitor:-Damascus, 6 February - The Grand Mufti of Syria, Sheikh Ahmad
Badruddin Hassoun expressed deep regret over the misbehaviour of some rioters
who abused of last Friday's protest demonstration against the offensive cartoons
published by Western newspapers to launch an assault on the Danish and Norwegian
embassies. Hassoun said "we feel sadness over what some people did, driven by
their emotions into a stage in which they impaired our dialogue with the Danish
and Norwegian peoples." He also disclosed that the Danish ambassador three days
ago brought him an official letter from the Danish prime Minister in which he
apologized and expressed sorrow over what some Danish newspapers did, informing
that "we had already accepted the apology, and agreed that the Danish newspaper
concerned would publish articles by some Moslems in Denmark on the noble
attributes and traits of the Prophet Mohammad so that we don't reach the stage
of conflict or lose friendship of some of our friends in Europe who support Arab
rights." Sheikh Hassoun asserted that last Friday's protest march had evolved as
a peaceful and disciplined action, but that at a certain point some rioters
intervened and turned the demonstration into an assault on the buildings.
Voicing out his distress over the unexpected violence, the Grand Mufti declared
that "we have never expressed our anger this way before. We have always believed
that the dialogue with the others can be achieved by teaching not by killing,
harming or burning them."
The Siniora Government Fully Responsible For the Hostility against the
Ashrafieh Residents
February 7, 2006 CLAO
In an unprecedented show of chaos and hostility, angry mobs rampaged the
Ashrafieh district in Beirut on Sunday February 5th. What started out as a
demonstration organized by Muslim Clerics in Lebanon protesting recent
derogatory cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed in the Scandinavian countries,
turned into an ugly riot smashing cars, windows that culminated into setting
fire to the building that houses the diplomatic mission of Denmark. As if not
enough lack of civility and criminal behavior, the mob turned against Christian
churches and icons reeking havoc with a clear intent of intimidation to the
predominately Christian population of the district with Lebanese Security forces
standing idle for the most part and ultimately retreating under the pressure of
the mob.
The Council of Lebanese American Organizations (CLAO) condemns in the strongest
terms these tragic events and expresses outrage to the complete failure of the
Lebanese Security Forces to prevent the mob from terrorizing the population and
destroying their properties. Even more disturbing are reports that Lebanese
Security Intelligence services had come across information about the real and
most malicious intent of some of the factions, prior to the actual
demonstration.
With the security situation deteriorating after fifteen car bombs and multiple
assassinations since the withdrawal of the Syrian Occupation Forces in April
2005, CLAO holds the current government lead by Prime Minister Fouad Siniora
fully responsible for the latest wave of violence and calls for its immediate
resignation.
CLAO would like also to point out that one of the major reasons at the root of
the current situation is the outcome of a the parliamentary election of 2005 in
which the Lebanese were coerced into undertaking, on the basis of a flawed
electoral law that produced false representation in the current parliament and
government. On this basis, CLAO would like to also call for an early
parliamentary election based on an amended electoral law, which should also
include provisions for expatriate voting, in order to ensure proper
representation of the Lebanese people which in turn would lead to a national
unity government capable of leading the reconstruction of Lebanon after 30 years
of Syrian Occupation that demolished its government institutions.
Where is the Lebanese Government?
UALM: Government must resign at once.
For Immediate Release
Sydney, Australia – The United Australian Lebanese Movement (UALM)
unconditionally condemns the violent protests and the resulting riots that
occurred in Ashrafieh, Beirut on Sunday.
While the UALM respects the right of all people to be able to hold
demonstrations and freely express their opinion, we denounce the use of terror,
violence and vandalism.
One of the major questions to arise from the sad events on Sunday, is that why
was the Internal Security Forces and the Lebanese Army given strict orders not
to deploy in the troubled areas. Instead a symbolic force was sent and was
easily scared away by the raging protestors.
The UALM calls on the Lebanese Government to accept responsibility in allowing
the protest to get out of hand. The Lebanese government continues to neglect its
duty to the people it’s meant to protect.
The UALM also demands that the Lebanese Government do more to protect lives and
property from those who look to instigate civil strife. The Lebanese Government
has clearly shown that it cannot or is unwilling to control the security
situation.
Due to the fact that there are certain groups who seem to have a free hand in
Lebanon and because of the Governments inaction and incompetence the Lebanese
people are now hostages in their own country. Taking into account the totally
unacceptable political and security situation in Lebanon, the UALM demands that
the Government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora resigns immediately. The
resignation of the Interior Minister Hassan Sabaa is too little too late.
The whole Lebanese Government must also share some responsibility. The Lebanese
people have had enough of their government’s failures.
The Lebanese government has continually failed to act against those who are
committing crimes of all sorts from bombings, political crimes and violent
riots.
OTHER UALM VIEWS:
The UALM congratulates the people of the Ashrafieh neighbourhood in Beirut for
the restraint shown. An already volatile situation could have been made worse
had the local residents decided to take matters into their own hands.
The UALM would also like to commend the Muslim clerics who were seen to be
trying to quell the violence. Their bravery did not go unnoticed. There actions
were appreciated by all Lebanese both Muslim and Christian. They are the real
face of Islam.
Media contact: Charlie Khouri
Ph :(02) 9687 0518
Fax: (02) 9687 0975
Mob: 0411 868 222