LCCC ENGLISH DAILY
NEWS BULLETIN
February 16/15
Lent in the Catholic Maronite Church
http://www.10452lccc.com/elias.arabic15/elias.cana%20wedding15.02.15.htm
Lent is a forty-day period before Easter. In the Catholic Maronite Church Lent
starts on the Ash Monday. Lent in principle is a Holy period that is ought to be
utilized with God in genuine contemplation, self humility, repentance, penances,
forgiveness, praying and conciliation with self and others
Maronite Church Bible Readings for the Cana Wedding Sunday
First Sunday of Great Lent: Cana Sunday/Commentary of the day
Saint Ephrem (c.306-373), Deacon in Syria, Doctor of the Church
Diatessaron XII, § 1-2
“What you have done is keep the choice wine until now.” In the desert, our Lord
multiplied the loaves of bread, and in Cana, he changed the water into wine.
Thus, he got people used to his bread and to his wine until the time when he
gave them his body and his blood. He let them taste a transitory bread and wine,
so that the desire for his life-giving body and blood might grow in them… He
attracted us by means of these things that are pleasant to the palate, in order
to lead us even more to that which gives life in full to our souls. He hid
sweetness in the wine he made, so as to show his guests what incomparable
treasure is hidden in his life-giving blood. As his first sign, he gave a wine
that gave joy to the guests, so as to show that his blood would give joy to all
nations. For if wine plays a part in all of earth’s joys, in the same way, every
true deliverance is linked to the mystery of his blood. He gave the guests at
Cana excellent wine, which transformed their mind, so as to let them know that
the teaching with which he would quench their thirst would transform their
heart.
This wine, which first of all was only water, was changed in jars, a symbol of
the first commandments, which he brought to perfection. The transformed water is
the Law brought to its fulfillment. The people who were invited to the wedding
drank what had been water, but without tasting that water. In the same way, when
we hear the former commandments, we taste them not with their former savor, but
with their new one.
John /Cana Wedding
John 02/01-11: "On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the
mother of Jesus was there. Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the
wedding. When the wine gave out, the mother of Jesus said to him, ‘They have no
wine.’ And Jesus said to her, ‘Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My
hour has not yet come.’His mother said to the servants, ‘Do whatever he tells
you.’ Now standing there were six stone water-jars for the Jewish rites of
purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. Jesus said to them, ‘Fill
the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim. He said to them, ‘Now
draw some out, and take it to the chief steward.’ So they took it. When the
steward tasted the water that had become wine, and did not know where it came
from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the steward called the
bridegroom and said to him, ‘Everyone serves the good wine first, and then the
inferior wine after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept the good
wine until now.’ Jesus did this, the first of his signs, in Cana of Galilee, and
revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.
Joel /Tear your heart, and not your garments
Joel 02/13-18: " Tear your heart, and not your garments, and turn to Yahweh,
your God; for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and abundant in loving
kindness, and relents from sending calamity. Who knows? He may turn and relent,
and leave a blessing behind him, even a meal offering and a drink offering to
Yahweh, your God. Blow the trumpet in Zion! Sanctify a fast. Call a solemn
assembly. Gather the people. Sanctify the assembly. Assemble the elders. Gather
the children, and those who nurse from breasts. Let the bridegroom go forth from
his room, and the bride out of her room. Let the priests, the ministers of
Yahweh, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, “Spare your
people, Yahweh, and don’t give your heritage to reproach, that the nations
should rule over them. Why should they say among the peoples, ‘Where is their
God?’” Then Yahweh was jealous for his land, And had pity on his people.
Paul's Letter to the Romans
Romans 14/14-23:"I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is
unclean in itself; but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean. If your
brother or sister is being injured by what you eat, you are no longer walking in
love. Do not let what you eat cause the ruin of one for whom Christ died. So do
not let your good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not food and
drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. The one who thus
serves Christ is acceptable to God and has human approval. Let us then pursue
what makes for peace and for mutual edification. Do not, for the sake of food,
destroy the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for you to
make others fall by what you eat; it is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do
anything that makes your brother or sister stumble. The faith that you have,
have as your own conviction before God. Blessed are those who have no reason to
condemn themselves because of what they approve.But those who have doubts are
condemned if they eat, because they do not act from faith; for whatever does not
proceed from faith is sin.
Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February
15-16/15
Lebanon: “Beyond the Naaheeb…Chou Fi?” (What is Beyond Wailing)/.Dr. Walid
Phares/February 15/15
US spies taking too much credit for Mughniyeh hit, Mossad operatives say/J.Post/February
15/15
Iranians and nostalgia for the Shah’s era/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February
15/15
From tourism to terrorism: welcome to post-Hariri Lebanon/Faisal J. Abbas /Al
Arabiya/February 15/15
Khamenei’s test: Will he be able to overcome the opposition of Iran's
extremists/YOSSI MELMAN/February 15/15
Lebanese Related
News published on
February 15-16/15
Geagea: Hezbollah, ISIS 'two sides of the same coin'.
Lebanese drone flies over Israel: Israeli report.
Report: Hizbullah Hindering Security Forces' Access to Some Bekaa Regions .
Mustafa Hujeiri: Negotiations to Release Arsal Captives are Going Well.
Report: Saad Hariri Remaining in Lebanon until Midweek .
Strikers at Beirut public hospital to escalate strike.
Justice Minister to chase down celebratory shooters.
Nasrallah warns against gunfire during speech.
South Lebanon fishermen celebrate large catch after storm.
Security raids target town north of Baalbek.
Delayed Security plans in Lebanon lose their bite .
Spoiled Meat Confiscated in Tripoli .
Miscellaneous
Reports And News published on
February 14-15/15
Egyptian Church confirms 21 killed in Libya after Islamic State issues video
Ban on Hariri Anniversary: Impunity Will Not Be Tolerated.
Kuwait emir, Saudi king review means of enhancing ties.
Jewish guard shot dead at Copenhagen synagogue.
US officials deny report of freezing Israel out of Iran nuclear talks
Israeli leader calls for 'massive' Jewish immigration after deadly attack in
Copenhagen
Third death, possibly of terrorist, after two victims killed in Copenhagen
attacks on café and synagogue.
The US-Israel divide.
Scores dead in intensified fighting in southern Syria: monitor .
Kurds clash with Turkish police on anniversary of leader's capture.
Iraqi government must control volunteer militias: deputy PM .
Iraqi army, militia repel ISIS attack on dam..
Israeli settlers paint leftists as anti-Semite collaborators.
Arab League to meet on Yemen Wednesday.
Gulf states call on UN to end Yemen crisis .
Yemeni militia defiant ahead of UN vote.
Saudi Arabia condemns 'terrorist' killing of US Muslims.
Italy 'ready to lead' coalition against jihadists in Libya.
Copenhagen gunman maybe inspired by Paris attacks: police.
Michele Ferrero, Nutella owner and Italy's richest man, dies aged 89.
Egypt lines up $6.8 bln of Kuwaiti investment for energy projects.
Bomb explodes in crowded northeast Nigerian bus station.
Jihad Watch Site Latest
Reports
Canada: Muslim graduation ceremony cancelled over “radical” speakers
Denmark: Police raid Internet cafe, arrest two Muslims in jihad probe
Denmark: Muslim who fired on free speech event and synagogue is killed
Danish PM on jihad murders: “This is not a war between Islam and the West”
Danish jihadi murderer freed from prison 2 weeks ago after knife attack
Islamic State chops off women’s hands for using cell phones
Islamic State beheading people for smoking cigarettes
Sex-abuse allegations against Chicago Muslim leader “playing into hands of
Islamophobes”
Lebanon: “Beyond the Naaheeb…Chou Fi?” (What is Beyond Wailing)
Dr. Walid Phares/February 15/15
On the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Prime Minister Hariri and his
companions, a violence that prompted thousands of Lebanese to demonstrate and
eventually put a million plus people on the streets of Beirut calling for Syria
withdrawal and Hezbollah disarming, the question is what now? For beyond the
“Naaheeb” and the frustrations expressed in the media and on social forums, as
well as in political speeches and editorials, the central question in that
country should be about what to do now, after a decade of debacles. While it is
always clear to suggest what needs to be done to confront the threats Lebanon
has been facing, threats that have been growing not receding, It is difficult to
answer what the politicians of Lebanon are going to -actually-do. While we know
for sure what Hezbollah and its allies are going to do, that is to maintain
their control of the country’s institutions and increase their military and
security dominance on the ground, we have to wait and see for what their
political opponents are planning on surprising us with. For if one hears or read
statements made in Lebanese media, there is little to be hopeful for. For these
politicians have been announcing that “Lebanon cannot confront Hezbollah,” that
“Hezbollah is an associate in the Governance of Lebanon,” and that the “top
priority is to have a President for this republic” even if the republic is and
will further be under the umbrella of the Ayatollahs. If you add and merge all
these statements in one platform, you’d conclude that Lebanon has no political
opposition to the Iranian-led Hezbollah and that all what it is, what it was and
will be, is who will and how to sit around the Council of Ministers’ long table.
Nothing new ‘Madame la Marquise’. Old same, old same: the survival of the
fittest among Lebanon’s politicians, particularly those who aren’t favored by
the “de facto regime.”
We will always identify with the sorrow expressed on passing anniversaries and
express our condolences, but we aren’t able to project good news on what comes
after the “Naaheeb.” For if the issue is only about a long table with couple
dozens politicians seated around, I don’t think Lebanon’s civil society has been
and is being well served by the establishment who speaks on behalf of their
present and plan their future.
Geagea: Hezbollah, ISIS 'two sides of the same coin'
The Daily Star/Feb. 15, 2015 /BEIRUT: Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea told a
Saudi daily that Hezbollah and ISIS are "two sides of the same coin," and
criticized Iran for spreading Islamism and preventing his election as president.
“Hezbollah is one face of political Islam, and its mere existence has pushed
many to adopt terrorism,” Geagea told the Saudi newspaper Al-Arab in comments
published Sunday. “Hezbollah and ISIS are two sides of the same coin, which is
political Islam. The existence of one of them nurtures the other... even if the
two are at war.”Geagea also slammed Iran for being “one of the largest symbols
of political Islam,” blaming the country for the rise of Islamism and
fundamentalism. “It inspired others to adopt Islamism, and its behavior in the
region has pushed all kinds of radicalism and extremism to the maximum,” he
said, referring to Iran. “And this is what led to the emergence of ISIS and
other extremist groups.” The Maronite leader also criticized Iran for working
against his presidential candidacy. He said Iran did not want him to become
president, as that would weaken the country’s influence in Lebanon. Geagea, on
the other hand, praised Saudi Arabia for its constructive role in Lebanon,
saying the kingdom’s only goal is to protect Lebanon’s political institutions,
economy and stability. He said the gulf country "does not interfere in
Lebanese politics, especially in the presidential elections matter” despite the
help it provides to Lebanon. “The kingdom also considers me a fundamentally
patriotic Lebanese politician who does whatever he can to move Lebanon from
where it is to a more stable situation,” he said. Lebanon has been without
president since May 2014, when former President Michel Sleiman left office at
the end of his term.
Report: Hizbullah
Hindering Security Forces' Access to Some Bekaa Regions
Naharnet /Security forces have so far failed to arrest any major fugitives,
three days into the adoption of a state-approved security plan in the eastern
Bekaa region, reported the Saudi daily Okaz on Sunday. It revealed that
Hizbullah has prevented the security forces from entering the outskirts of some
towns in the area because the party has “transformed them into military
zones.”These zones also include training camps. Later on Sunday, the army issued
a statement announcing that it had arrested during its operations on Saturday 33
suspects, confiscated nine cars and 26 motorcycles, and seized a number of
drugs, military equipment, and light weapons.The latest arrests bring the total
number of detainees to at least 90 since the security plan kicked off on
Thursday.
Mustafa Hujeiri: Negotiations to
Release Arsal Captives are Going Well
Naharnet/Sheikh Mustafa al-Hujeiri revealed that he has sensed “for the first
time” that negotiations to release the servicemen kidnapped from the
northeastern border town of Arsal are being conducted seriously, reported the
Kuwaiti daily al-Rai on Sunday.
He told the daily: “The negotiations are heading on a good path and we hope to
reach a conclusion that would please the families of the captives.”“Each side
has its demands,” he added. He stressed however that he can only speak on behalf
of negotiations with the al-Qaida-affiliated al-Nusra Front. Hujeiri said that
he is not informed on the talks with the Islamic State group kidnappers. The
servicemen were abducted from Arsal by the al-Nusra Front and IS in the wake of
clashes in August. A few of them have since been released, four were executed,
and the rest remain held. The hostage-takers had warned several times the
Lebanese authorities that they would kill more captives if they did not meet
their demands. Among their demands is the release of Islamist prisoners in
Lebanon. Meanwhile, the spokesman of the families of the captives, Hussein
Youssef told al-Rai that reports that the hostages will be released soon “are
inaccurate.” He added however: “The negotiations had come to a halt at one
point, but they have since gone back on the right track and they are now on a
relatively positive level.” “Given these factors, we hope that the servicemen
will be released soon,” he stated. The negotiations are not bad and therefore
their release is possible if they continue in such a manner,” Youssef remarked.
The family of abducted soldier Abdul Rahim Diab revealed on Saturday that it
visited him in the outskirts of Arsal, describing his condition as “tragic.”The
family said that the visit occurred on Wednesday, refusing to disclose further
details.
US spies taking too much credit for
Mughniyeh hit, Mossad operatives say
By JPOST.COM STAFF/02/15/2015
The American intelligence community is taking too much credit for the joint
Central Intelligence Agency-Mossad operation in 2008 that killed Hezbollah’s top
operations man and arch-terrorist Imad Mughniyeh, an author and espionage expert
for CBS News wrote on Sunday.
Dan Raviv, a journalist who co-authored a book about Israeli espionage, wrote
that Israeli officials were unhappy over recent leaks to The Washington Post and
Newsweek that they believe were designed to exaggerate the CIA’s role in
Mughniyeh’s assassination.
The killing of one of the world’s most wanted terrorists was widely attributed
to Israel in the foreign media.
US involvement in the death of Mughniyeh was confirmed to The Washington Post
last month by five former US intelligence officials who spoke on condition of
anonymity.
According to the report, the CIA obtained the legal authority to kill the
Hezbollah leader because it was able to prove that, “he was a continuing threat
to Americans,” through his connection to the arming and training of Shi’ite
militias in Iraq who were targeting and killing US forces. Mughniyeh’s son,
Jihad, was killed on January 18 in an air strike on the Syrian side of the Golan
Heights that has been attributed to Israel. Besides Mughniyeh, five other
Hezbollah operatives and six Iranian Revolutionary Guards personnel, including a
general, were killed in the attack. Among other terrorist attacks against US
citizens, Mughniyeh the father was linked to the 1983 bombing of the US Embassy
in Beirut that killed 63 people, and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi
Arabia that killed 19 US servicemen.
Mughniyeh was also implicated in the 1992 suicide bombing of the Israeli Embassy
in Buenos Aires that killed 29 people and the 1994 attack on the Jewish
community center in the Argentinian capital, which killed 85.
The US and Israeli intelligence organizations worked together for months
monitoring Mughniyeh in Damascus to determine where the bomb should be planted,
according to the report.
At one point an opportunity presented itself to kill both Mughinyeh and Qassem
Suleimani, commander of Iran’s Quds Force, who according to the report is an
“archenemy of Israel,” and had also orchestrated the training of Shi’ite
militias in Iraq. The trigger was not pulled, however, because the operatives
did not have the legal authority to kill him.
According to the uncovered information, on February 12, 2008, Mughniyeh was
killed, “on a quiet nighttime street in Damascus after eating dinner at a nearby
restaurant... when a bomb planted in a spare tire on the back of his vehicle
exploded.”
A team of CIA spotters in Damascus was tracking his movements, and Mossad agents
in Tel Aviv triggered the bomb remotely according to the report.
“The way it was set up, the US could object and call it off, but it could not
execute,” a former US intelligence official told the newspaper.
Planning for the operation was “exhaustive.”
The CIA leaks, however, irked Israeli officials who, as Raviv writes, insist
that the Mughniyeh operation “was entirely blue and white” – a reference to the
colors of the Israeli flag – “with hardly any red, white, and blue.”
“Some Israelis, it seems, object to seeing the Americans taking too much
credit,” Raviv writes. “What follows is based on what knowledgeable Israelis
have been telling Western officials and diplomats. They say the US participated
in the deliberations, the intelligence gathering, the surveillance, and some
logistics of the assassination - but they call the assassination itself an
Israeli operation: lock, stock, and barrel.”
As Raviv tells it, most of the preparations for the hit on Mughniyeh were
already made by Mossad agents who had tracked the Hezbollah operative as he had
come in and out of his Damascus apartment.
“At least according to what Israelis have been telling Western officials, the
Mossad did not need the CIA for active management of the operation,” Raviv
writes. “They had already gleaned all the details necessary about Mughniyeh's
daily routine and his hideout in Damascus. “
“The CIA was there, as they put it, to fill in any missing intelligence
information and provide extra eyes in Damascus.”
Wary about killing innocent bystanders, the Americans withdrew their cooperation
from the mission, but later rejoined after then-prime minister Ehud Olmert
provided videotape evidence that the bomb which would be used to kill Mughniyeh
would be precise.
Mughniyeh's Damascus hideout was in close proximity to a girls' school, and the
Americans were adamant that any operation to kill him would have to be pinpoint
so as not to harm anyone else in the vicinity. The Hezbollah operative was also
wont to meet with senior Iranian military and intelligence figures, men whom the
Americans also were determined not to touch since Washington had no desire to
provoke Iran.
The actual bomb used to kill the terrorist was developed and perfected in
Israel, not in the United States, as reports suggested.
Once the Israelis received confirmation that Mughniyeh was alone and heading to
his car near his apartment, the order was given to intelligence officials in Tel
Aviv to activate the explosive device by remote control.
Delayed plans lose their bite
The Daily Star/Feb. 13, 2015
The Lebanese authorities are fond of talking up their “security plan” and their
plans to implement security plans, but a lot less talk and a lot more action is
what’s needed. Politicians must lay the groundwork for certain policies
beforehand, both in the media and with the public, to ensure their success.But
when the topic of the imminent implementation of a “security plan” spends weeks
in the media spotlight, there’s a danger fugitives from justice can use this
grace period to go into hiding. When the plan is eventually implemented, the
excessively long preparatory period only undermines it.Tripoli is the main focus
of this policy, but the slow pace of implementation is worrying. And the recent
commotion over the removal of religious and political paraphernalia shows how
tenuous the situation in Lebanon’s northern capital truly is. Lebanon is a small
country and there are no secrets – when implementation of policy is lacking, the
news will emerge quickly. Moreover, Tripoli is just part of the equation. Until
similar security plans are implemented across the country, the policy will be on
shaky ground. People are fond of speaking about the lawlessness in the northern
Bekaa Valley, but there are areas of the capital and its southern suburbs that
also urgently require the stern intervention of the authorities to clamp down on
illegalities.The sooner a security plan for Lebanon – and not just Tripoli – is
implemented, the better. Also, spending less time announcing the imminent
implementation of such a plan and putting in more effort on durable steps on the
ground would be a welcome change.
Report: Saad Hariri Remaining in
Lebanon until Midweek
Naharnet /Head of the Mustaqbal Movement MP Saad Hariri who had arrived in
Lebanon overnight on Friday is expected to remain in the country until the
middle of next week, reported the Kuwaiti daily al-Anba on Sunday. It did not
specify which day he is set to depart Beirut. The former premier had arrived in
Lebanon from the Saudi Arabian capital Riyadh to attend a ceremony marking the
tenth anniversary of the assassination of his father former Prime Minister Rafik
Hariri. The commemoration was held in Beirut on Saturday.
Prime Minister Tammam Salam, Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Latif Daryan, ministers
from the Mustaqbal bloc and March 14 alliance, head of the Mustaqbal bloc MP
Fouad Saniora, and a number of political and economic figures met with Hariri on
Saturday at his headquarters at the Center House in downtown Beirut. Former PM
Rafik Hariri was assassinated in a massive bombing in Beirut on February 14,
2005.
Lebanese drone flies over Israel: Israeli report
The Daily Star/BEIRUT: An unmanned aircraft crossed from Lebanon overnight and
flew over Israel for 20 minutes before returning, an Israeli media report said
Sunday. The drone entered Israel from the Lebanese border village of Naqoura
just after 1 a.m. Sunday, the news website Rotter.com said. The incident was the
second of its kind to happen during the last few weeks, according to the report.
In 2012, a Hezbollah drone successfully flew 55 kilometers into Israeli airspace
before being shot down by the Israeli army.
In a public address, the party’s leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said the drone
was designed in Iran and assembled in Lebanon.
Strikers at Beirut public hospital to escalate strike
The Daily Star/Feb. 15, 2015 | 04:22 PM
BEIRUT: Employees at Rafik Hariri University Hospital announced Sunday that they
would not admit any new patients to the emergency department of the hospital
starting Monday morning, an escalation in a strike that began last week. “[We
announce] the complete closure of the emergency entrance starting Monday at 9:30
a.m.,” the union said in a statement released Sunday. The strikers said their
decision will be followed by “daily escalations” until their demands are met.
The employees of Beirut’s main public hospital are protesting the delay in
receiving their salaries for the month of January and what they perceive as a
lack of employment benefits. “We were paid December’s salaries in January, but
we still haven’t received January’s pay,” an employee, speaking on the condition
of anonymity, told The Daily Star. She explained that the controversy began with
the delay of December’s wages, when the finance ministry claimed that it had not
received a budget proposal from the health ministry to allow payments.
After Health Minister Wael Abou Faour insisted that he had sent the documents,
the finance ministry admitted it had received the budget proposal but said that
money that the hospital owes the ministry from old loans would be deducted from
the budget. “If they deduct this sum, the money won’t be enough to pay half our
salaries,” the employee said. In addition to the payment of their salaries,
employees are demanding additional employment benefits in line with those of
other public sector employees.
“This issue begins with the salaries matter, but does not end before achieving
all the rightful demands for the employees considering the austerity they are
suffering from and the absence of any of the warranties, incentives or rights
that our fellow public sector employees enjoy,” the union’s statement said. The
launch of the strike coincided with the resignation of Faysal Shatila, the
former chief of the hospital’s board. Health Minister Abu Faour announced
Wednesday that he accepted Shatila’s resignation, saying it allowed for the
implementation of “rescue plan” to save the hospital. Abu Faour had previously
announced a plan of reforms in response to the hospital's financial deficit,
which had caused a shortage in equipment and tools. Shatila, on the other hand,
said he resigned because this same rescue plan was never carried out by the
government. The hospital’s staff remained on strike despite Shatila's
resignation, saying they would not go back to work unless officials promised to
add a discussion of the hospital's current crisis to the Cabinet’s agenda.
Pope Benedict XVI 2006 Lent message
"Jesus, at the sight of the crowds, was moved with pity"(Matthew 9:36)
Dear Brothers and Sisters!
Lent is a privileged time of interior pilgrimage towards Him Who is the fount of
mercy. It is a pilgrimage in which He Himself accompanies us through the desert
of our poverty, sustaining us on our way towards the intense joy of Easter. Even
in the "valley
of darkness" of which the Psalmist speaks (Psalm 23:4), while the tempter
prompts us to despair or to place a vain hope in the work of our own hands, God
is there to guard us and sustain us. Yes, even today the Lord hears the cry of
the multitudes longing for joy, peace, and love.
As in every age, they feel abandoned. Yet, even in the desolation of misery,
loneliness, violence and hunger that indiscriminately afflict children, adults,
and the elderly, God does not allow darkness to prevail. In fact, in the words
of my beloved Predecessor, Pope John Paul II, there is a "divine limit imposed
upon evil," namely, mercy ("Memory and Identity," pp. 19ff.). It is with these
thoughts in mind that I have chosen as my theme for this Message the Gospel
text: "Jesus, at the sight of the crowds, was moved with pity" (Matthew 9:36).
In this light, I would like to pause and reflect upon an issue much debated
today: the question of development. Even now, the compassionate "gaze" of Christ
continues to fall upon individuals and peoples. He watches them, knowing that
the divine "plan" includes
their call to salvation. Jesus knows the perils that put this plan at risk, and
He is moved with pity for the crowds. He chooses to defend them from the wolves
even at the cost of His own life.
The gaze of Jesus embraces individuals and multitudes, and he brings them all
before the Father, offering Himself as a sacrifice of expiation. Enlightened by
this Paschal truth, the Church knows that if we are to promote development in
its fullness, our own "gaze" upon mankind has to be measured against that of
Christ. In fact, it is quite impossible to separate the response to people's
material and social needs from the fulfillment of the profound desires of their
hearts. This has to be emphasized all the more in today's rapidly changing
world, in which our responsibility
towards the poor emerges with ever greater clarity and urgency. My venerable
Predecessor, Pope Paul VI, accurately described the scandal of underdevelopment
as an outrage against humanity. In this sense, in the Encyclical "Populorum
Progressio," he denounced "the lack of material necessities for those who are
without the minimum essential for life, the moral deficiencies of those who are
mutilated by selfishness" and "oppressive social structures, whether due to the
abuses of ownership or to the abuses of power, to the exploitation of workers or
to unjust transactions" (ibid., 21). As the antidote to such evil, Paul VI
suggested not only "increased esteem for the dignity of others, the turning
towards the spirit of poverty, cooperation for the common good, the will and
desire for peace," but also "the acknowledgment by man of supreme values, and of
God, their source and their finality" (ibid.). In this vein, the Pope went on to
propose that, finally and above all, there is "faith, a gift of God accepted by
the good will of man, and unity in the charity of Christ" (ibid.). Thus, the
"gaze" of Christ upon the crowd impels us to affirm the true content of this
"complete humanism" that, according to Paul VI, consists in the "fully-rounded
development of the whole man and of all men" (ibid., 42). For this reason, the
primary contribution that the Church offers to the development of mankind and
peoples does not consist merely in material means or technical solutions.
Rather, it involves the proclamation of the truth of Christ, Who educates
consciences and teaches the authentic dignity of the person and of work; it
means the
promotion of a culture that truly responds to all the questions of humanity.
In the face of the terrible challenge of poverty afflicting so much of the
world's population, indifference and self-centered isolation stand in stark
contrast to the "gaze"of Christ. Fasting and almsgiving, which, together with
prayer, the Church proposes in a special way during the Lenten Season, are
suitable means for us to become conformed to this "gaze." The examples of the
saints and the long history of the Church's missionary activity provide
invaluable indications of the most effective ways to support development. Even
in this era of global interdependence, it is clear that no economic, social, or
political project can replace that gift of self to another through which charity
is expressed. Those who act according to the logic of the Gospel live the faith
as friendship with God Incarnate and, like Him, bear the burden of the material
and spiritual needs of their neighbors. They see it as an inexhaustible mystery,
worthy of infinite care and attention. They know that he who does not give God
gives too little; as Blessed Teresa of Calcutta frequently observed, the worst
poverty is not to know Christ. Therefore, we must help others to find God in the
merciful face of Christ. Without this perspective, civilization lacks a solid
foundation. Thanks to men and women obedient to the Holy Spirit, many forms of
charitable work intended to promote development have arisen in the Church:
hospitals, universities, professional formation schools, and small businesses.
Such initiatives demonstrate the genuine humanitarian concern of those moved by
the Gospel message, far in advance of other forms of social welfare. These
charitable activities point out the way to achieve a globalization that is
focused upon the true good of mankind and, hence, the path towards authentic
peace. Moved like Jesus with compassion for the crowds, the Church today
considers it her duty to ask political leaders and those with economic and
financial power to promote development based on respect for the dignity of every
man and woman. An important litmus test for the success of their efforts is
religious liberty, understood not simply as the freedom to proclaim and
celebrate Christ, but also the
opportunity to contribute to the building of a world enlivened by charity. These
efforts have to include a recognition of the central role of authentic religious
values in responding to man's deepest concerns, and in supplying the ethical
motivation for his personal and social responsibilities. These are the criteria
by which Christians should assess the political programs of their leaders.
We cannot ignore the fact that many mistakes have been made in the course of
history by those who claimed to be disciples of Jesus. Very often, when having
to address grave problems, they have thought that they should first improve this
world and only afterwards
turn their minds to the next. The temptation was to believe that, in the face of
urgent needs, the first imperative was to change external structures. The
consequence, for some, was that Christianity became a kind of moralism,
"believing" was replaced with
"doing."
Rightly, therefore, my Predecessor, Pope John Paul II, of blessed memory,
observed: "The temptation today is to reduce Christianity to merely human
wisdom, a pseudoscience of well-being. In our heavily secularized world, a
'gradual secularization of salvation' has taken place, so that people strive for
the good of man, but man who is truncated. … We know, however, that Jesus came
to bring integral salvation" ("Redemptoris Missio," 11). It is this integral
salvation that Lent puts before us, pointing towards the victory of Christ over
every evil that oppresses us. In turning to the Divine Master, in being
converted to Him, in experiencing His mercy through the Sacrament of
Reconciliation, we will discover a "gaze" that searches us profoundly and gives
new life to the crowds and to each one of us. It restores trust to those who do
not succumb to skepticism, opening up before them the perspective of eternal
beatitude. Throughout history, even when hate seems to prevail, the luminous
testimony of His love is never lacking. To Mary, "the living fount of hope"
(Dante Alighieri, "Paradiso," XXXIII, 12), we entrust our Lenten journey, so
that she may lead us to her Son. I commend to her in particular the multitudes
who suffer poverty and cry out for help, support, and understanding. With these
sentiments, I cordially impart to all of you a special Apostolic Blessing.From the Vatican, 29 September 2005
Iranians and nostalgia for the Shah’s era
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya
Sunday, 15 February 2015
Ever since 1980, Iranians have celebrated Khomeini’s revolution every year.
However, as time passed, the number of people who reject the revolution and who
believe it was the worst historical setback in the history of Iran has
increased. Year after year, more politicians and intellectuals who were involved
in the revolution or supported it began to re-evaluate the experience within the
context of restoring consciousness – an act which usually follows revolutions or
failed changes.
As the Iranian Islamic Republic now celebrates the 36th anniversary of toppling
the Shah, another prominent Iranian figure joins the ranks of those who speak
out against the revolution. It’s Mohsen Sazegara, one of those who participated
in establishing the revolutionary guards which were and still are the military
elite of the revolution and remain the most powerful and influential forcey in
the country. Sazegara regretfully said if he could go back in time, he wouldn’t
have participated in the revolution, adding that toppling the Shah’s regime was
a mistake which the Iranians paid a high price for. Most of those who changed
their minds about the revolution are like him – retired men who don’t seek
attaining any high-ranking posts and are not part of the political struggle.
They are simply aged men who can observe the entire scene and evaluate it based
on their experience and according to the end result of Iran’s current situation.
Any fair historian will certainly see how there were many defects and failures
during the Shah’s rule. But the Shah – until his collapse in the 1970s – managed
to turn Iran into one of the most developed and successful countries in the
Middle East – compared to the Gulf, Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan. He turned the
country into an industrial and military power and an excellent scientific
center. The region’s countries thus viewed Tehran as a civilized model. However,
zealot revolutionaries, from the leftist movement and extremist Islamists,
deleted most of this history and rewrote it like Mao Tse-Tung did in China and
the Bolsheviks in Russia.
To confront this increased nostalgia to the Shah’s era, those who defend the
revolution and who believe in it no longer try to forge recent history. This no
longer works, considering the people’s memory has been revived and that the
millions of people who lived through in Shah’s era are actually still alive.
Excuses and blame
They therefore try to make up excuses for the failures of the past 36 years in
the fields of development, living conditions, freedom and others. The remaining
revolutionaries are blaming the West and the “hypocrites,” i.e. the opposition,
for their failure.
These excuses no longer convince the people, especially that the regime
reassures its audience that it’s negotiating with the West and is about to
reconcile with its rivals! Freedom, democracy, improving livelihood and becoming
independent from the West were the slogans of protesters calling for toppling
the Shah in Tehran and its squares.
Today, three and a half decades on, none of these demands have been met. The
circumstances Iranians are living today are actually worse than how it was
during the Shah’s reign. The margin of political freedom has decreased and
social restrictions dominated. Parliamentary and presidential elections have
been limited to Islamists, rivals have been jailed and the only parties present
are those who are affiliated with the regime. The situation is thus worse than
it was when the Shah was around. The livelihood situation regressed, misery
reigned and Tehran and the rest of major cities were transformed into remains of
a city – just mere remains of what the Shah built. After its long revolutionary
path, the political regime of velayat-e faqih turned against all its slogans as
it is seeking relations with the United States and wants the American treasury
to allow it to use the dollar in the rial exchange and remittance and wants the
U.S. Congress to allow it to use technology for oil exploration and production!
Practically speaking, there’s no revolution in Iran anymore. There’s just
another repressive, security and political regime which is crueler than the
Shah’s. The only hope which the government and the Iranians have left is to
achieve reconciliation with the West and become open to the world, like Vietnam,
Cuba, China and Russia have done before them.
From tourism to terrorism: welcome to
post-Hariri Lebanon!
Faisal J. Abbas /Al Arabiya
Saturday, 14 February 2015
I still remember that beautiful summer night in the early 2000s; Downtown Beirut
was just buzzing with a massive amount of residents, expats and tourists who
went out every evening to enjoy fine-dining, shopping, clubbing and/or smoking
shishas till the early hours of the morning in the then-newly renovated heart of
the Lebanese capital. So busy was the atmosphere, that I remember that when I
sat down with a number of friends (who like me at the time were students in
their senior year at university) at a famous Downtown café opposite the
headquarters of the pan-Arab daily Al-Hayat, we really had to struggle to get
the attention of the waiters who were doing their best to handle the bombardment
of orders being thrown at them, mostly by much better-tipping Gulf tourists who
didn’t – for obvious reasons – have as much problems as we did in getting
attention! Then, all of a sudden, the musician playing the saxophone by our
table stopped playing, everybody stood up and people all around us started
clapping and cheering as the late PM Rafiq Hariri emerged holding hands with
former French President Jacques Chirac.
Chirac was on an official visit to Lebanon at the time and it seems the late
Prime Minister decided to show him first hand the progress made by the Lebanese
people, both socially and physically, so he decided to take him out for a walk
to experience the lifestyle and infrastructure that he (Hariri) worked so hard
to provide for his nation. There were no bodyguards in sight; there were no
weapons and no formalities whatsoever. On the contrary, both leaders casually
shook hands with people (Of course, Monsieur Chirac made sure he made an
exception when it came to ladies, whom he preferred to kiss, rather than to
shake hands with!) as the musician spontaneously decided to play the French
national anthem on his saxophone. PM Hariri was assassinated in a horrific
explosion on Feb. 14, 2005, just over two years after that short – but iconic –
stroll with Chirac. A decade later, Downtown Beirut is a shadow of what it used
to be. Most of the café-restaurants that used to open till the early hours of
the morning have gone out of business, while waiters stand outside the doors of
the ones that survived almost begging walkers by to come and enjoy a meal, or
just a drink.
On the other hand, Lebanon's current security mess, with bombs going off
regularly and assassinations becoming as common as hand-shakes, it is unlikely
that we will ever see a French president, or any other world leader, strolling
by the roads of Beirut without severe protection and arrangements.
Of course, Downtown Beirut is just a microcosm that reflects the overall
situation in Lebanon, a country that has slowly lost its soul over the past 10
years.
Since his assassination, Hezbollah – the Iranian-backed militant group accused
alongside the Syrian regime of being behind Hariri’s killing – has become the de
facto ruler of Lebanon.
Today, this resistance-turned-terrorist group solely decides if Lebanon lives in
peace, or dies in pieces. An example of this was when Hezbollah single-handedly
drove the whole nation into a war with Israel in the summer of 2006.
Hezbollah also pretends to be playing politics up to a certain point, but if the
Lebanese government ever decides to question, let alone limit their ability to
obtain arms or have their own telecommunications network for example, then they
will not hesitate to take over the capital by lethal force as they did in 2008.
Also, against the will of the Lebanese government, Hezbollah interfered in the
war in neighboring Syria. Indeed, it didn’t take long for the militia’s leader,
Hassan Nasrallah, to show his true colors when the situation erupted next door.
After having won some respect upon supporting the revolution in Egypt, Nasrallah
was fast to portray that what applies to one dictator, doesn’t apply to another,
if the other was a fellow Iranian-backed agent that provides his terrorist
organization bottomless logistical support.
Nasrallah sent his highly experienced fighters to assist the crumbling Assad
army and to kill innocent Syrians, including women and children. Arguably, it
was his fighters who contributed the most in aiding the Syrian regime to regain
control and remain in power till now.
From tourism to terrorism
Today, Lebanon – a country with a population of 4.4 million – has more than a
million registered Syrian refugees and God knows how many ISIS and other extreme
Sunni fighters who are likely to seek revenge from Hezbollah. The country at the
moment doesn’t have an agreed-upon head of state, and since the assassination of
moderate Rafiq Hariri, the Sunnis of the country have no real leader to turn to
(particularly with the absence of Hariri’s son, Saad, who – for security reasons
– is in self-imposed exile.)
The country at the moment doesn’t have an agreed-upon head of state, and since
the assassination of moderate Rafiq Hariri, the Sunnis of the country as well as
moderate Lebanese of all sects have no real leader to turn to (particularly with
the absence of Hariri’s son, Saad, who – for security reasons – is in
self-imposed exile.)
Poverty and extremism are spreading, tourists are being kidnapped and the
nation-wide institutional failure has reached a point that residents don’t even
trust that the medicine and food they are consuming hasn’t been tampered with.
However, leave it to Hezbollah – who had the audacity to call the devastating
2006 war which left 1,000 people killed a victory – and they would probably tell
you that Lebanon couldn’t be in any better shape!
“However, leave it to Hezbollah – who had the audacity to call the devastating
2006 war which left 1,000 people killed a victory – and they would probably tell
you that Lebanon couldn’t be in any better shape!”
Faisal J. Abbas
In fact, this is exactly what Hezbollah MP Nawwaf Musawi did last week when he
said that his party helped transform Lebanon from “a country which took pride in
its tourism and business sectors, to one whose citizens celebrate dignity in
resistance.”
Of course, the truth is the only thing achieved by Hezbollah over the past
decade was that they successfully managed to transform Lebanon from tourism… to
terrorism!
Third death, possibly of terrorist,
after two victims killed in Copenhagen attacks on café and synagogue
DEBKAfile Special Report February 15, 2015
Two shooting attacks within 10 hours of each other in Copenhagen left two
civilians and five Danish police officers injured before and after midnight
Saturday, Feb. 14. A man was early Sunday shot dead by police at the nearby
Norrebro railway station when he opened fire. Police are attempting to establish
whether he was one of the shooters and if indeed the two attacks were connected.
Police warned people to stay off the streets early Sunday as armed terrorists
were still at large and the entire country placed on high terror alert..
In the second incident, outside the main synagogue in central Copenhagen, a
young man was shot in the head at close range and two police officers guarding
the building were injured. The gunman ran from the scene on foot.
In the first incident Saturday night, one person was killed and three police
officers injured by multiple shots at a meeting in a Copenhagen cafe in support
of freedom of speech with the Swedish artist Lars Vilks, threatened with death
over the cartoons he published in 2007 depicting the Prophet Mohammad as a dog.
He has had constant police protection since then. The artist and the French
ambassador who was present were not harmed. The gunman did not make it into the
café. He fired at least 200 bullets into the building. Bodyguards are described
by witnesses as returning the fire before the shooter escaped in a waiting
Volkswagen, which was later found abandoned.
Like the editor of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo editor, which
Islamists attacked last month killing 17 people, Vilks was one of nine faces on
a "Most Wanted" graphic published by al Qaeda's Inspire magazine for "crimes
against Islam."
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, arriving at the scene of the first
attack, said, "Everything points to ... the shooting in Oesterbro (being) a
political assassination and therefore a terror attack." She vowed that
"all resources will be used to find (those responsible) and bring them before a
judge" for an attack she said filled her "with deep anger." "We have some
difficult days ahead," the Prime Minister said. "... But in Denmark, we will
never bow to violence."
ISIS released a video on Sunday purportedly showing the
beheading of Egyptian Coptic Christians the militants say they captured in Libya
By Staff writer | Al Arabiya News
Sunday, 15 February 2015
President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi called Sunday an urgent meeting of Egypt’s top
national security body after ISIS militants released a video purportedly showing
the beheading of Egyptian Christians in Libya.Sisi also gave a television
address, saying that Egypt and the world are facing “ferocious threats” hailing
from radical militants, who are “devoid of any humane sense.”He also said Egypt
is “capable” in facing this menace, adding that Egyptians are no longer allowed
to travel to Libya. ISIS released a video on Sunday purportedly showing the
beheading of Egyptian Coptic Christians the militants say they captured in
Libya. The footage released online shows handcuffed hostages wearing orange
jumpsuits being beheaded by their black-suited captors on a seashore in the
Libyan capital of Tripoli.
Egypt's state news agency MENA quoted the spokesman for the Coptic Church as
confirming that 21 Egyptian Christians believed to be held by ISIS were dead.
Egypt also announced a seven-day mourning period. Families of the 27 Egyptian
Coptic Christians workers kidnapped in the Libyan city of Sirte, hold pictures
of their kidnapped relatives as they ask for their release, in front of the U.N.
office in Cairo January 19, 2015. (Reuters)
Al-Azhar condemns ‘barbaric’ killing
Meanwhile, Sunni Islam’s top body, Al-Azhar, on Sunday condemned the “barbaric”
beheading of the Copts.“Al-Azhar received the news of the execution of a group
of innocent Egyptians with great sorrow and grief,” Al-Azhar said in a
statement. “Al-Azhar stresses that such barbaric action has nothing to do with
any religion or human values.”
Dabiq magazine
In the latest issue of ISIS online magazine Dabiq, the group said 21 Egyptian
hostages were being held, and pictures showed a similar background. The video,
titled “A message signed with blood to the nation of the cross,” has a scrolling
caption in the first few seconds saying it is directed at “People of the cross,
followers of the hostile Egyptian Church.” Sunday’s video comes just days after
ISIS released a video showing the gruesome burning alive of a Jordanian pilot it
captured after his F-16 came down in Syria in December.
The highly choreographed video showing the killing of Maaz al-Kassasbeh
triggered global outrage. In January, ISIS branch in Libya claimed it had
abducted 21 Christians. A spokesman for the Egyptian foreign ministry confirmed
to AFP in Cairo that 20 Egyptians had been kidnapped in two separate incidents
in neighboring Libya. Badr Abdelatty did not say when they were seized or
specify their religious affiliation, but said seven Egyptians and 13 others
abducted separately in Libya “are still being detained” by their captors.
Italy closes Libyan embassy
In a related story, Italy closed its embassy in Libya on Sunday and stepped up
its call for a U.N. mission to calm the worsening conflict there as thousands of
migrants approached Italy by boat from North Africa. Libya is unraveling, with
two rival governments operating their own armed forces under separate
parliaments, nearly four years after the civil war that ousted leader Muammar
Gaddafi. “The deteriorating situation in Libya made it necessary to close (the
embassy),” Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni said. Embassy staff have been sent
back to Italy, the ministry said. (With AFP and Reuters)
Egyptian Church confirms 21 killed in Libya after Islamic
State issues video
CAIRO (Reuters) - Islamic State released a video on Sunday purporting to show
the beheading of a group of Egyptian Christians kidnapped in Libya, violence
likely to deepen Cairo's concerns over security threats from militants thriving
in the neighboring country's chaos. Egypt's state news agency MENA quoted the
spokesman for the Coptic Church as confirming that 21 Egyptian Christians
believed to be held by Islamic State were dead. In the video, militants in black
marched the captives, dressed in orange jump suits, to a beach the group said
was near Tripoli. They were forced down onto their knees, then beheaded. The
video appeared on the Twitter feed of a website that supports Islamic State,
which has seized parts of Iraq and Syria and has also beheaded Western hostages.
A caption on the five-minute video read: "The people of the cross, followers of
the hostile Egyptian church."Thousands of Egyptians have traveled to Libya in
search of jobs since an uprising at home in 2011, despite advice from their
government not to go to a country sliding into lawlessness. Before the killings,
one of the militants stood with a knife in his hand and said: "Safety for you
crusaders is something you can only wish for." President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi
called a seven-day mourning period and an urgent meeting of Egypt's top military
commanders, state television reported. The Coptic Church said it was confident
the Cairo government would seek justice. Al Azhar, the center of Islamic
learning in Egypt, said no religion would accept such "barbaric" acts. The
families of the kidnapped workers had urged Cairo to help secure their release.
In the southerly Minya Governorate, relatives screamed and fainted upon hearing
news of the deaths.
CONCERNS ABOUT LIBYA
Sisi has repeatedly expressed concerns about militants based in Libya who are
seeking to topple his government. Those militants have made contact with Sinai
Province, a group operating from Egypt's Sinai Peninsula that has changed its
name from Ansar Beyt al-Maqdis and pledged allegiance to Islamic State. The
group has killed hundreds of Egyptian soldiers and police since the army toppled
Islamist president Mohamed Mursi in 2013 after mass protests against his rule.
With Libya caught in a chaotic power struggle between two rival factions
operating their own governments, Western officials fear Islamist militants are
taking advantage of the turmoil to strengthen their presence. A number of
Islamist militant groups have been active since the fall of Muammar Gaddafi in
2011 left Libya without a strong central government. A few have declared ties to
the radical Islamic State and claimed high-profile attacks over recent weeks in
what appears to be an intensifying campaign. Last month, Islamic State claimed
responsibility when at least two gunmen stormed into the five-star Corinthia
Hotel in Tripoli, killing nine people, including an American security contractor
and a Frenchman. Fears that the crisis in neighboring Libya could spill across
the border have prompted Egypt to upgrade its military hardware. French
President Francois Hollande has said Egypt will order 24 Rafale fighter jets, a
naval frigate and related military equipment in a deal to be signed in Cairo on
Monday worth more than 5 billion euros ($5.7 billion). (Reporting by Ahmed Tolba;
Writing by Michael Georgy; Editing by Kevin Liffey)
US spies taking too much credit for
Mughniyeh hit, Mossad operatives say
By JPOST.COM STAFF/02/15/2015
The American intelligence community is taking too much credit for the joint
Central Intelligence Agency-Mossad operation in 2008 that killed Hezbollah’s top
operations man and arch-terrorist Imad Mughniyeh, an author and espionage expert
for CBS News wrote on Sunday.
Dan Raviv, a journalist who co-authored a book about Israeli espionage, wrote
that Israeli officials were unhappy over recent leaks to The Washington Post and
Newsweek that they believe were designed to exaggerate the CIA’s role in
Mughniyeh’s assassination.
The killing of one of the world’s most wanted terrorists was widely attributed
to Israel in the foreign media.
US involvement in the death of Mughniyeh was confirmed to The Washington Post
last month by five former US intelligence officials who spoke on condition of
anonymity.
According to the report, the CIA obtained the legal authority to kill the
Hezbollah leader because it was able to prove that, “he was a continuing threat
to Americans,” through his connection to the arming and training of Shi’ite
militias in Iraq who were targeting and killing US forces.
Mughniyeh’s son, Jihad, was killed on January 18 in an air strike on the Syrian
side of the Golan Heights that has been attributed to Israel. Besides Mughniyeh,
five other Hezbollah operatives and six Iranian Revolutionary Guards personnel,
including a general, were killed in the attack.
Among other terrorist attacks against US citizens, Mughniyeh the father was
linked to the 1983 bombing of the US Embassy in Beirut that killed 63 people,
and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 US servicemen.
Mughniyeh was also implicated in the 1992 suicide bombing of the Israeli Embassy
in Buenos Aires that killed 29 people and the 1994 attack on the Jewish
community center in the Argentinian capital, which killed 85.
The US and Israeli intelligence organizations worked together for months
monitoring Mughniyeh in Damascus to determine where the bomb should be planted,
according to the report.
At one point an opportunity presented itself to kill both Mughinyeh and Qassem
Suleimani, commander of Iran’s Quds Force, who according to the report is an
“archenemy of Israel,” and had also orchestrated the training of Shi’ite
militias in Iraq. The trigger was not pulled, however, because the operatives
did not have the legal authority to kill him.
According to the uncovered information, on February 12, 2008, Mughniyeh was
killed, “on a quiet nighttime street in Damascus after eating dinner at a nearby
restaurant... when a bomb planted in a spare tire on the back of his vehicle
exploded.”
A team of CIA spotters in Damascus was tracking his movements, and Mossad agents
in Tel Aviv triggered the bomb remotely according to the report.
“The way it was set up, the US could object and call it off, but it could not
execute,” a former US intelligence official told the newspaper.
Planning for the operation was “exhaustive.”
The CIA leaks, however, irked Israeli officials who, as Raviv writes, insist
that the Mughniyeh operation “was entirely blue and white” – a reference to the
colors of the Israeli flag – “with hardly any red, white, and blue.”
“Some Israelis, it seems, object to seeing the Americans taking too much
credit,” Raviv writes. “What follows is based on what knowledgeable Israelis
have been telling Western officials and diplomats. They say the US participated
in the deliberations, the intelligence gathering, the surveillance, and some
logistics of the assassination - but they call the assassination itself an
Israeli operation: lock, stock, and barrel.”
As Raviv tells it, most of the preparations for the hit on Mughniyeh were
already made by Mossad agents who had tracked the Hezbollah operative as he had
come in and out of his Damascus apartment.
“At least according to what Israelis have been telling Western officials, the
Mossad did not need the CIA for active management of the operation,” Raviv
writes. “They had already gleaned all the details necessary about Mughniyeh's
daily routine and his hideout in Damascus. “
“The CIA was there, as they put it, to fill in any missing intelligence
information and provide extra eyes in Damascus.”
Wary about killing innocent bystanders, the Americans withdrew their cooperation
from the mission, but later rejoined after then-prime minister Ehud Olmert
provided videotape evidence that the bomb which would be used to kill Mughniyeh
would be precise.
Mughniyeh's Damascus hideout was in close proximity to a girls' school, and the
Americans were adamant that any operation to kill him would have to be pinpoint
so as not to harm anyone else in the vicinity. The Hezbollah operative was also
wont to meet with senior Iranian military and intelligence figures, men whom the
Americans also were determined not to touch since Washington had no desire to
provoke Iran. The actual bomb used to kill the terrorist was developed and
perfected in Israel, not in the United States, as reports suggested. Once the
Israelis received confirmation that Mughniyeh was alone and heading to his car
near his apartment, the order was given to intelligence officials in Tel Aviv to
activate the explosive device by remote control.
Khamenei’s test: Will he be able to overcome the opposition
of Iran's extremists?
By YOSSI MELMAN/02/15/2015
The recently reported exchange of letters between US President Barack Obama and
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei will increase Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu’s feelings of paranoia. But news of the letter exchange will
also strengthen the feeling of the Republicans in the US Congress that the Obama
administration is interested, to say the least, in reaching a diplomatic
agreement with Iran.
On the agenda is not only the closing of the Iranian nuclear file in a deal that
will include the easing of economic sanctions in exchange for the curtailment of
the nuclear program. A much broader deal is being contemplated which will
include understandings for cooperation in the war against Islamic State (ISIS).
If such a broad deal is reached, the US-Iranian relationship will have undergone
a revolution.
Thirty-five years have passed since the Iranian Revolution which gave the reins
of power in Tehran to religious leaders whose epithet for the US is the “Great
Satan.” If Khamenei and Obama reach understandings, this would be an historical
breakthrough; a reconciliation comparable to the warming of ties between Mao’s
China initiated by US President Richard Nixon in the early 1970s.
But the path to such a deal is still long. The gaps are wide between the sides
on the nuclear issue - the first matter to be resolved if there is to be
reconciliation between the two countries. The report on the exchange of letters
in The Wall Street Journal mentioned that Khamenei only responded to Obama’s
letter after a few months, demonstrating that the supreme leader is in no rush.
Khamenei is progressing, if at all, at a slow pace. It is difficult for him to
erase 36 years of hate.
During the bloody Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, Revolutionary Guards officers
tried to convince then-leader and founder of the Iranian Republic, Ayatollah
Ruhollah Khomeini, to agree to a cease-fire due to Iran’s difficult situation.
Khomeini would not agree under any circumstances and the war that had claimed
one million lives on both sides lasted eight years. But finally, Khomeini
understood that Iran needed a break from the difficult burden of the war. He was
quoted as saying that for him agreeing to a cease-fire with his arch-enemy
Saddam Hussein was like "drinking a cup of poison." In the end Khomeini drank
from the cup.
The big question is if Ali Khamenei will also agree to drink from the "poison
cup" and will overcome the opposition of the extremists at the head of the
Revolutionary Guards and order President Hassan Rouhani, who heads the moderates
in power, to reach a deal on Iran’s nuclear program. When such a deal is
reached, it will also be easier to arrive at broader understandings.
Yossi Melman is an Israeli journalist and writer who specializes in security and
intelligence affairs. He is co-author of "Spies Against Armageddon: inside
Israel's Secret Wars.
Visit Yossi Melman's blog: www.israelspy.com
Translation by Nathan Wise
US officials deny report of freezing
Israel out of Iran nuclear talks
By MICHAEL WILNER/02/15/2015/J.Post
Washington's policy of briefing Israel on progress in negotiations with Iran
over its nuclear program has not changed, senior US officials told The Jerusalem
Post on Sunday, despite reports to the contrary in Israeli media.
Channel 2 reported earlier in the day the US would halt its briefings to Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in light of his planned speech to Congress.
Netanyahu is expected to criticize the state of the global diplomatic effort,
which is geared towards crafting a comprehensive nuclear agreement.
"Conversations continue with Israel on the Iran nuclear negotiations," one
senior State Department official said. "Under Secretary [of State for Political
Affairs Wendy] Sherman met with Israeli NSA Cohen and Minister for Intelligence
and Strategic Planning Steinitz in Munich and will see NSA Cohen again this
week." The official noted that the Iran talks were, "obviously," the main topic
of conversation.
"And Secretary [of State John] Kerry continues his conversations with Prime
Minister Netanyahu about this issue, as has always been the case," the official
continued. The White House also rejected the report, noting Cohen's upcoming
meeting next week at the White House with National Security Advisor Susan Rice.
"This report is patently false," National Security Council spokesman Alistair
Baskey told the Post. "We also continue our frequent and routine contact at
various professional levels within the intelligence, military, and diplomatic
spheres."The report is one of many from Israeli television that has been
criticized in recent months by the White House. In January, a senior US official
characterized claims the US had given in to 80 percent of Iran's demands in the
talks as "complete nonsense."
Channel 2 reported that the White House is incensed over the Israeli
government's conduct in recent weeks regarding the Iranian issue, believing that
Jerusalem has taken a sensitive issue with implications for national security
and used it for political gain while interfering in American domestic politics.
According to Channel 2, the Obama administration is also angry over Israeli
officials' distorted use of information about the progress of the Iran nuclear
talks. Sherman reportedly informed her counterparts in Jerusalem that she would
no longer provide updates on the Iran nuclear negotiations due to what
Washington perceives as untoward use of the information for domestic Israeli
political purposes. The Channel 2 report also stated that the administration has
instructed Rice to cease communications with Cohen. The Prime Minister's Office
responded to the Channel 2 report by saying that Israel and the US continue to
maintain "deep strategic relations" and that Cohen is due to fly to the US soon
to take part in a conference, during which he is scheduled to meet with both
Sherman and Rice.
Earlier on Sunday, House Speaker John Boehner said he made a politically
calculated decision not to inform the White House of his invitation to Netanyahu
to address a joint session of Congress, fearing US President Barack Obama would
attempt to obstruct the speech.
Speaking to Fox News, Boehner said that Netanyahu's message on Iran was
important for the American people to hear— and that the White House would prefer
they not hear his position, which stands in opposition to the president's.
"I wanted to make sure that there was no interference," Boehner said, referring
to the White House. "There’s no secret here in Washington about the animosity
that this White House has for Prime Minister Netanyahu. I frankly didn’t want
that getting in the way, quashing what I thought was a real opportunity."The
host of "Fox News Sunday," Chris Wallace, has been critical of the speaker's
moves in the past, and asked Boehner if he has turned the critical issue of
US-Israel relations into a political football.
"I have not," he said. "The fact is that we had every right to do what we did...
I wanted the prime minister to come here."