LCCC ENGLISH DAILY
NEWS BULLETIN
February 02/15
Bible Quotation For Today/The
Fulfillment of the Law, Murder, Adultery
Matthew 05/17-30: "“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the
Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly
I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter,
not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law
until everything is accomplished. 19 Therefore anyone who sets aside one
of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be
called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches
these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell
you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and
the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of
heaven.“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You
shall not murder,[a] and anyone who murders will be subject to
judgment.’ 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or
sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother
or sister, ‘Raca,’[d] is answerable to the court. And anyone who says,
‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell. “Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and
there remember that your brother or sister has something against you,
leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled
to them; then come and offer your gift. “Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you
to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your
adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you
over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. Truly I tell
you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny. “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit
adultery.’But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has
already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye
causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for
you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown
into hell. And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and
throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than
for your whole body to go into hell.".
Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February
01-02/15
Kobani: They resisted and won...no Taef, no Doha/Walid Phares/February 01/15
Let Hezbollah and Islamic State destroy one another/Guy
Bechor/Ynetnews/February02/15
No rules of engagement mean no more red lines with Israel/Samya
Kullab/The Daily Star/February 02/15
The hidden US message to Israel behind the leaked reports of the Mughniyeh
assassination/By
YOSSI MELMAN/J.Post/February 01/15
Iran’s human rights failure/BENJAMIN WEINTHAL/J.Post/February 01/15
Imad Mughniyeh and Hezbollah's Shadow War: A Washington Institute
Backgrounder/Matthew Levitt/February 01/15
Egypt's turning on Hamas won't solve Israel's Gaza problem/Zvi
Bar'el/Haaretz/February 01/15
Lebanese Related News published on February 01-02/15
9 Dead, 20 Hurt in Bombing of Bus Carrying Lebanese Pilgrims in Damascus
French Envoy, Girault Returns to Beirut Monday with Low
Expectations on Ending Presidential Impasse
Future officials slam Nasrallah’s speech
Fiery Speech of Hezbollah fallout to spare Future-Hezbollah talks
Shadi Mawlawi still in Ain al-Hilweh: report
Report: Salam Hopes to Boroujerdi that Iran's Ties to Lebanon 'Would Serve all
Lebanese'
Corruption the cause of Lebanon’s misery: Rai
Report: March 14 Camp to Announce Political Roadmap on 10th Anniversary of its
Inception
Sacked Lebanon Casino staff reject new committee to end standoff
Suspected Defected Syrian Soldier Arrested in Akkar
ISF explosives unit kept busy in times of turmoil
UNRWA facing greater challenges as funds dry up
Future officials slam Nasrallah’s speech
Speech fallout to spare Future-Hezbollah talks
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
February 01-02/15
Mosul deteriorates under IS occupation
Israeli Foreign Minister: Third Lebanon war inevitable
Serbia grants citizenship to Dahlan
ISIS in full swing under ex-Iraqi general: 70 deaths in a month, on the march in
10 countries
Sisi: "Egypt faces long, tough battle against militants"
Egypt releases and deports Australian Al Jazeera journalist
ISIS executes second Japanese hostage
Two wounded in car explosion south of Tel Aviv: media
Airstrikes hit 76 ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria
U.N.: Iraq Violence Killed 1,375 in January
Kurdish forces free oil workers in Kirkuk
Two U.S. Defense Contractors Wounded in Saudi Shooting
ISIS claims beheading of Iraqi security personnel
British mosques hold open day after Paris attacks
Fraud, organized crime costing Africa billions per year: study
Tunisia’s Islamist party agrees to join coalition government
Suicide bombing in Nigeria kills 7: police, witnesses
Saudi Beheads Murderer, 5th Execution under New King
Jordan vows to save life of ISIS-held pilot
Houthis set deadline to unravel Yemen crisis
Jihad Watch Site Latest Reports
Obama: “Overwhelming majority of Muslims reject” jihadists’ view of Islam
Charlie Hebdo editor criticizes hypocrisy of “I Am Charlie” world leaders
Saudis free woman jailed for “insulting Islam”
Japanese PM “infuriated” by Islamic State’s murder of Japanese hostage
Marvel Comics Muslima superhero on a jihad against free speech
The whole city is in fear”: Boko Haram jihadis attack Nigerian city
Dalai Lama: Unfair to associate terrorism with Islam
Islamic State destroying all books other than Islamic texts
Human Rights Act has helped 28 jihad terrorists stay in UK
Kyrgyztsan: 1,000 Muslims rally: “I am not Charlie, I love my Prophet.”
Kobani: They resisted and won...no
Taef, no Doha...
Walid Phares
February 01/15
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2015/02/01/dr-walid-phareskobani-they-resisted-and-won-no-taef-no-doha/
In past decades it was said that: had it not been for Taef or for Doha (where
deals were cut favoring Syria and Hezbollah's roles in exchange of few seats for
politicians in the central Government), free Lebanon in 1990 and the Cedars
Revolution in 2008 would have perished. Wrong indeed. Look at the Kurds of
Kobani celebrating their victory, even partial, even momentarily, in dances. The
Lebanese people produced dozens of Kobanis in the 1980s and produced the first
popular revolution in the Middle East in 2005, but their politicians didn't go
to the end of the popular energy. They stopped the ship before it reaches
destination. "We have no international cover" they said. Since when resistance
movements waited for the international cover. Resistance movements stand up, and
international backing comes after, not the other way around. Kobani's Kurds were
surrounded from all fronts, including from Turkey yet they fought with all what
they've got. It is only after and because they fought, that Coalition warplanes
bombed ISIS around the city. It was only because the city fought. The Pentagon
declared Kobani lost for days, but the Kurds fought on, retaining only 30
percent of the city. It is only when the young men and women showed the world
that there will be no surrender, that public opinion moved and air strikes
intensified. No resistance, no support. The courage displayed by the young men,
and especially young women, wasn't unique to that part of Syria and the Middle
East. It was seen in Zahle, Ashrafieh and Qnat in the 1980s against the Assad
armies but the resistance was terminated by the so-called Taef agreement of
1989. Decades later, the Lebanese rose again in West Beirut, Aley and the Chouf
in 2008 against Hezbollah's aggression, and again politicians ran to Doha,
crying that there is no international support, ignoring their own popular
resistance. In Syria, a a small city of Kobani won without a Taef agreement or a
Doha deal. Why? Because their politicians were on the front lines leading the
fight. That is the lesson for the third generation of Lebanese today. The rest
is arguments consumed and re-consumed again, unable to convince us of
otherwise...
The hidden US message to Israel behind
the leaked reports of the Mughniyeh assassination
By YOSSI MELMAN/J.Post
02/01/2015
Besides the message for the people of Israel and for Netanyahu, the media
reports of the joint Mossad-CIA mission also serve Israeli security interests.
It is hard to believe that the timing was coincidental.
Whoever leaked the details of the 2008 joint Mossad-CIA assassination of
Hezbollah operational chief Imad Mughniyeh to two US newspapers, and certainly
to a paper like The Washington Post, (the second one was Newsweek), did not do
so capriciously. Most likely someone wanted to send the following message to the
people of Israel and also to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: You need us.
Look at the extent of the cooperation between our intelligence communities,
which risks being damaged due to the discordant policies of your prime minister.
This was the nature of the hidden message behind the leaked assassination
operation.
The leak is surprising because the US usually only confirms its clandestine
operations if it takes responsibility for them. In the case of Mughniyeh,
neither the US nor Israel claimed responsibility. And there remains room for
denial because the source of the leak was an anonymous US official and not an
official government statement. The actual details of the leak are less
important, and we shall see that some of them are lacking in accuracy.
The impression given from the leaked details is that someone wanted the US to
take the lion’s share of the credit for the Mughniyeh assassination. According
to the media reports, in the joint operation that killed Hezbollah’s “defense
minister,” the Mossad played second fiddle to the CIA who was the senior more
central partner. It’s possible that this is a great exaggeration, the truth was
entirely different and in fact the Mossad was the dominant player in the
operation.
The impression of the Mossad’s primary role rises from the leaked details
themselves. It was reported that it was the Mossad who provided the intelligence
on Mughniyeh’s movements in Damascus where he had a secret residence. Also,
according to the reports, the idea to assassinate Mughniyeh was the brainchild
of the head of the Mossad at the time, Meir Dagan. It was noted that the US
military and intelligence officials also raised the possibility of assassinating
the Hezbollah figure with whom they had an open account for having the blood of
hundreds of Americans on his hands.
But for Israel, which followed Mughniyeh’s movements for many years, he was a
more important target than he was for the US. According to the report, even
though the explosive device in the operation was tested and built in the US, the
detonation device was in the hands of the Israelis in Tel Aviv.
A tone of American pride could be heard in the report over the fact that the CIA
agents were present in Damascus during the mission. It can be assumed that if
the Mossad was a partner in the operation members of its Kidon unit also had a
significant on-site presence, as has been published in foreign publications,
including in my book co-authored with the American journalist Dan Raviv, Spies
Against Armageddon: Inside Israel’s Secret Wars.
Usually, in highly sensitive assassination operations, the Mossad prefers "blue
and white" solo executions, meaning working alone, without partners. Only in
rare cases, when the two countries have mutual interests in eliminating the
target and they can keep it as a secret without any legal or international
implications, or when Israeli intelligence fails to have access, would they then
turn to a partner. But, this does not mean that there is no sharing of
information and intelligence on targets, without cooperation in fulfilling the
ultimate goal.
The reports also mentioned the involvement of Jordanian intelligence. This is
also unsurprising for those familiar with the intimate ties between the states.
In contrast to what was written in the report, Mughniyeh was not killed shortly
after finishing dinner at a Damascus restaurant, but rather after meeting with
his mistress.
Israel’s role in the mission was likely larger than the US role, but there is no
battle over credit in this joint operation. Even with the hidden message to the
people of Israel and to Netanyahu with the leaking of the details at this time,
the report can serve Israel’s security interests as well. The report presents a
challenge to Hezbollah and sends it, and Iran, a difficult message: Your
conflict is not only with Israel it is also with the US.
**Yossi Melman is an Israeli journalist and writer who specializes in security
and intelligence affairs. He is co-author of "Spies Against Armageddon: inside
Israel's Secret Wars.
Visit Yossi Melman's blog: www.israelspy.com
Translation by Nathan Wise
No rules of engagement mean no more
red lines with Israel
Samya Kullab/The Daily Star/Feb. 02, 2015
BEIRUT: Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah addressed his supporters on Feb. 17, 2010, in a
televised speech to commemorate the killing of both his predecessor Abbas
Mousawi, who died during an Israeli air raid in 1992, and Hezbollah’s top
military commander Imad Mughniyeh, killed in a car bomb attack in 2008. Their
deaths, he promised, would be avenged “in the right time and place, and
circumstances.” By threatening to respond to Israeli attacks proportionately –
“If you bomb the Rafic Hariri Airport in Beirut, we will bomb Tel Aviv’s Ben
Gurion,” he told the cheering crowd – Nasrallah gave to observers a frame with
which to understand Hezbollah’s confrontation with its enemy.
Five years later the scene would repeat itself, and the promise of revenge was
renewed, this time at a ceremony to honor the deaths of six Hezbollah fighters
killed in an Israeli airstrike in Syria’s Qunaitra. Among the dead was the son
of the late military commander, 25-year-old Jihad Mughniyeh. But on this
occasion Narsallah’s vow included a game-changing qualifier.
“We have the right to respond in any place, at any time and in the way we deem
appropriate,” he said, signaling that the tacit rules of combat underlying
Hezbollah’s war of deterrence with Israel had changed. But how this “new
equation,” as Hezbollah deputy commander Naim Qassem referred to the shift,
would affect future battles between the warring entities remains to be seen. In
the past, the rules of the game were simpler, recalled Timur Goksel, former
spokesperson for UNIFIL and professor at the American University of Beirut, who
witnessed the gradual evolution of Hezbollah during the ’90s. The first instance
in which Hezbollah and Israel agreed to respect red lines was in the
Israeli-Lebanese Ceasefire Understanding of April 1996, which concluded Israel’s
Operation Grapes of Wrath. In it both sides agreed to avoid attacks on civilians
and to use populated villages to launch attacks. The dynamics changed after
Israel’s withdrawal from south Lebanon in 2000, after which clashes centered
around the still-occupied Shebaa Farms.
“In between, before the 2006 [July War] the rules of the game were not to attack
any place beyond Shebaa, the reason being there are no civilians there, it’s a
completely militarized zone,” Goksel said.
But in 2006, the equation drastically changed when Israel launched a
wide-ranging war in response to a cross-border raid by Hezbollah to kidnap two
Israeli soldiers with the hope of exchanging them for captives held by Israel.
“Because the area where Hezbollah carried out the operations was not in Shebaa,
everyone said they broke the rules of the game.”
Both the number of casualties and the nature of the target often determined the
question of escalation, Goksel explained. Other than civilian deaths, the number
of military casualties was also a factor that could determine the severity of
counterattack. For instance, had the Hezbollah ambush of an Israeli convoy in
Shebaa, in retaliation for the Qunaitra attack, killed 10 and not two soldiers,
Goksel believes the blowback would have been far more drawn out.
Qassem Qassir, an expert in Islamic movements, interpreted Nasrallah’s public
rejection of the rules of the game to mean attacks could be waged on a wider
stage, well beyond the confines of Shebaa. “Now the world is an open field for
Hezbollah and Israel to launch attacks,” he said, expecting the Golan Heights to
see more military operations in the coming months. “Right now we are in a
transitional phase, we need to wait until the dust has settled to see what is
going to happen in the region,” he added, predicting that warming U.S.-Iranian
relations, as well as developments in Syria, would weigh on military
calculations from both sides. “Hezbollah has made it clear that there are no red
lines,” he said. “The conflict is open.”
Former Lebanese Army Gen. Elias Hanna disagreed that Nasrallah had done away
with rules of engagement. “Nature opposes a void,” he told The Daily Star.
“Nasrallah said there are no more rules to the game, but that by itself
constitutes a rule of the game.”
The principle of proportionality was never a set standard, he argued, but a
strategic calculation considering regional and domestic circumstances in Lebanon
and Israel. “If you hit me, I will hit back, this dynamic will create an
understanding, an unspoken agreement that everyone comprehends,” he said. “But
sometimes there can be miscalculations, this can lead to war.” If one side feels
it is in their interest to shift the status quo, which might have provoked
Israel’s attack in Qunaitra for instance, each subsequent strike would rewrite
the rules, he said.
“The purpose of this is psychological: to create an atmosphere of ambiguity and
anxiety that the stakes are rising,” he explained.
“It’s clear no one wants a war now – the situation today is that Israel killed
seven and Hezbollah retaliated, everyone is happy – but if we go to war, it will
be because it benefits the parties.”
Future officials slam Nasrallah’s
speech
The Daily Star/Feb. 02, 2015
BEIRUT: Former premier Fouad Siniora denounced over the weekend Hezbollah chief
Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah’s latest speech, describing it as impetuous and
dangerous. Speaking during a seminar at the AmericanUniversity of Beirut to
commemorate the assassination of former Minister Mohammad Chatah, Siniora
slammed Nasrallah’s comments with respect to changing the rules of engagement
with Israel.
Nasrallah delivered his speech Friday during a ceremony to honor six Hezbollah
fighters killed during the Jan. 18, Israeli airstrike in Syria’s Qunaitra, in
which he announced that the rules of engagement between the resistance and
Israel had ended.
“Following the Qunaitra operation and the response in the Shebaa Farms, I want
to be clear: We in the Islamic Resistance [Hezbollah] in Lebanon are no longer
concerned with any such thing as the rules of engagement. We don’t recognize the
rules of engagement that have ended,” Nasrallah said in his speech.
Hezbollah retaliated to the Qunaitra attack Wednesday – two days prior to the
speech – in an ambush operation that killed two Israeli soldiers and wounded
seven in the occupied Shebaa Farms.
Siniora said Nasrallah’s remarks were “unilateral and hasty and eliminate the
will of the Lebanese people who are committed to [U.N] Resolution 1701,” which
ended the July 2006 War.
Speaker Nabih Berri slammed those criticizing Nasrallah’s speech, saying that
the Hezbollah attack on the Israeli military convoy in Shebaa did not breach
U.N. Resolution 1701 and was “a clean operation carried out on occupied Lebanese
territory.
Ahmad Hariri, Future Movement’s secretary-general, said Saturday that the
Lebanese were united against the idea of being dragged into a new war with
Israel, “amid living through the ravages of Hezbollah’s involvement in Syria.”
Hariri also denounced the heavy gunfire that accompanied Nasrallah’s speech in
areas where Hezbollah enjoys broad support, saying it was a danger to citizens.
As the fifth Hezbollah-Future Movement dialogue session is set to take place
this week, Tripoli MP Mohammad Kabbara questioned Sunday the rationale behind
Nasrallah’s move.
He echoed Hariri remarks with respect to celebratory gunfire, asking: “Is this
how Hezbollah respects the security plan, which is a key theme in its dialogue
with Future?”
Kabbara said he believes that Nasrallah’s speech only aimed to lift the spirits
of Hezbollah supporters, as the party’s military wing was suffering great
“losses” in its military operations in Syria.
Other politicians hailed Hezbollah’s response to Israel’s strike in Qunaitra and
Nasrallah’s speech.
Among those singing Nasrallah’s praises was Sheikh Mohammad Yazbek,
representative of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Lebanon and a
high-ranking Hezbollah official.
“The speech imposed an equation that will protect Lebanon from future violations
by the Israeli enemy,” Yazbek said during a ceremony marking the one-week
anniversary of the death of 1st Lt. Ahmad Mahmoud Tabikh, who was killed with
seven others during the Jan. 23 clashes in Ras Baalbek’s Tallet al-Hamra sparked
by an ISIS ambush.
Yazbek’s comments were directed at “those annoyed by the resistance’s response
in the Shebaa Farms.”
He said Hezbollah had retaliated in a manner that would restore the dignity of
the Lebanese.
Israel has been defeated, said Industry Minister Hussein Hajj Hasan, describing
Hezbollah’s response as “heroic.”
“The conflict with the Zionist enemy is once again a priority to people in the
Arab world,” Hasan added, speaking during a ceremony to commemorate the death of
Army recruit Mujtaba Amhaz in Ras Baalbek.
Information Minister Ramzi Joreige said that fears of escalation following
Hezbollah’s retaliatory attack had eased.
He told Radio Liban Libre Saturday that Hezbollah gave considerable thought to
the manner in which its responded to the Qunaitra attack.
Fiery Speech of Hezbollah fallout to spare Future-Hezbollah talks
The Daily Star/Feb. 02, 2015
BEIRUT: The Future Movement and Hezbollah will meet for a fifth round of talks
Tuesday, the first time they convene after the resistance party chief said the
Israeli airstrike in Qunaitra last month has shattered the rules of engagement
with Israel.
But it appears that the Future-Hezbollah dialogue will not be affected by the
negative impact the fiery speech of Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah has
left within Future Movement circles, Speaker Nabih Berri told his visitors
Sunday.
He said dialogue between the two rival groups would carry on undeterred as it
was agreed “from day one that problematic issues such as Hezbollah’s arsenal,
its intervention in Syria and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon will not be
tackled.”
According to March 8 sources, Tuesday’s session to be held at Berri’s residence
in Ain al-Tineh will pursue discussions on defusing Sunni-Shiite tensions – the
main item on the dialogue agenda which also includes finding a mechanism to
allow the election of a president, boosting efforts to combat terrorism,
promoting a new electoral law and energizing stagnant state institutions.
Berri promised that the Lebanese would see their capital free of any political
signage for the Amal Movement, Hezbollah and the Future Movement so as to
contribute in minimizing tensions. Berri said the Interior Ministry would carry
out the task of removing the signage.
As for reports that the issue of celebratory gunfire in Beirut fired by
Hezbollah supporters during Nasrallah’s highly anticipated speech Friday will
figure high up on the agenda of talks, one March 8 source that the issue was
“problematic for Hezbollah maybe more than the Future Movement.” “The
issue is certainly not an item on the agenda but might be tackled as part of the
broader topic of defusing Sunni-Shiite tensions,” the source told The Daily
Star, adding that Nasrallah has long pleaded with his supporters to refrain from
resorting to celebratory gunfire during his appearances. The criticism leveled
against Nasrallah’s speech the head of the Future parliamentary bloc MP Fouad
Siniora was also unlikely to deter the talks.
Siniora condemned over the weekend what he described as brash remarks made by
Nasrallah, saying comments concerning the shattered rules of engagement with
Israel “are unilateral and hasty and eliminate the will of the Lebanese people
who are committed to Resolution 1701.”“The criticism will not affect dialogue
one bit,” the source said. “Siniora is one of the politicians who are bothered
by the ongoing dialogue between Hezbollah and the Future Movement.”
Over the weekend, Future Movement MP Ghazi Youssef said that for the benefit of
the Lebanese, dialogue with Hezbollah would not stop after the party targeted an
Israeli military convoy in the occupied Shebaa Farms. “This dialogue builds for
calm amid all the turmoil the region is witnessing,” he added. The dialogue
between Hezbollah and the Future Movement, whose strained ties have heightened
sectarian and political tensions and sometimes put the country on edge, has won
support from rival politicians, as well as from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, the
U.S. and the European Union.
Let Hezbollah and Islamic State
destroy one another
Guy Bechor/Ynetnews/ Published: 02.02.15/Israel Opinion
Op-ed: In light of the fast changing situation on the borders, Israel should
have a channel of dialogue with Hezbollah in order to convey calming messages –
including quiet non-aggression agreements.
While the al-Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra organization is taking over almost
all the territory facing our Golan Heights, and the Islamic State is breaking
into Lebanese territory from the north – and after it declared last week that it
was "launching the war to liberate the Lebanon region and add it to the Islamic
State" – the last thing Hezbollah needs right now is a conflict with .
Its two existential enemies, Sunni organizations al-Qaeda and Islamic State, are
outflanking it from the east and from the south, and it is deeply engaged in
that area. The definers of the Middle East have changed, and they are no longer
Arabs against Israel, but Sunnis against Shiites.
That's why Hezbollah was so shocked when its senior members were killed on
January 18 in Mazraat al-Amal, in the area of Syrian President Bashar Assad's
90th Brigade. That area is the last one which has remained in the hands of the
Syrian regime, and that is where Hezbollah has set up its headquarters and
gathered its fighters.
What are they doing there? They have decided to defend that area at all costs,
because if Jabhat al-Nusra crosses it, it will be able to continue northward to
the Shiite and Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon's Beqaa Valley, turn westward to
the Shiite areas of southern Lebanon, or turn eastward towards Damascus.
We were stressed out by the fact that hundreds of Hezbollah fighters were
gathering next to our border in the Golan, a place they haven't been present in
before, but neither have Jabhat al-Nusra fighters. Hezbollah thought that we
understood its existential distress, and the fact that it basically gave us
years of calm, and that created the misunderstanding. Mazraat al-Amal is located
opposite our Hermon post, and Hezbollah wasn't even trying to conceal its
actions.
In other words, the war of the ethnic groups is more important, as far as these
terror organizations are concerned, than Israel. And as far as both the Sunnis
and the Shiites are concerned, we are the less threatening enemy.
So why did Hezbollah retaliate on Mount Dov last week? Because it became a
subject of ridicule in the Arab world in the past week for threatening but not
responding. If Hezbollah hadn't retaliated in some way, it would have served as
proof that the organization has sunk so deep into the Syrian mud that it has
abandoned the Israeli issue.
In light of the fast-changing situation on the borders, we should have a channel
of dialogue with Hezbollah in order to convey calming messages – including quiet
non-aggression agreements. That doesn't turn us into Hezbollah supporters, of
course, just like we are not supporters of al-Qaeda and Jabhat al-Nusra.
Hezbollah already suspects that we have a quiet non-aggression agreement with
the latter.
We must make it clear to all sides that we have no interest in the world wars
between them – after all, we are neither Sunnis nor Shiites – and that if they
want to kill one another, it is none of Israel's business and it will not
intervene in favor of any of them.
Therefore, Israel should not intervene in regards to Hezbollah's fighting zone
in the 90th Brigade area either. That's the Sunnis and Shiites' fate, as long as
none of them dares violate our sovereignty.
So why are we disturbing them? As Napoleon used to say, never interfere with an
enemy when he's in the process of destroying himself.
9 Dead, 20 Hurt in Bombing of Bus
Carrying Lebanese Pilgrims in Damascus
Naharnet /01.02.15
A blast ripped through a bus carrying Lebanese Shiite pilgrims in Damascus on
Sunday, killing at least nine people, a monitor said, in an attack claimed by
al-Qaida's Syrian branch. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said at least
20 people were wounded in the explosion near Souq al-Hamadiyeh district, and
that six of the dead were Lebanese citizens. In Beirut, the Oshaq al-Hussein
pilgrimage agency that organized the trip said all the passengers on the bus
were Lebanese, identifying the dead as Mohammed Ahmed Meqdad, Mahdi Youssef
Meqdad, Qassem Hatoum, Ali Abbas Ballouq, Shadi Houmani and Mohammed Hassan
Ayyoub. "They set out from Beirut at 5:30 am (0330 GMT) this morning," agency
employee Fadi Khaireddin told Agence France-Presse, adding that the bus had
space for 52 pilgrims, as well as the driver and trip administrator. "The bus is
usually full," he added, though he could not confirm how many people were on the
trip this weekend.
He said the bus had made its first stop at the Sayyida Roqaya shrine and was
heading to the revered Sayyida Zeinab shrine in southeast Damascus when the
attack occurred. Khaireddin said the group had been making regular trips
throughout the Syrian conflict, with groups leaving each weekend for a day-long
visit to shrines revered by Shiite Muslims across the border. Al-Nusra Front,
the affiliate of al-Qaida in war-ravaged Syria, claimed responsibility for the
attack in a statement posted online. Syrian state media, which reported a toll
of six dead and 19 wounded, said the blast was caused by an explosive device
rather than a suicide bomber. State news agency SANA said officials had found
and defused a second bomb that had been placed inside the bus before it
detonated.
Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said the bus had a Lebanese license plate
and was carrying Shiite Muslim pilgrims visiting religious sites in Damascus.
Syrian state television showed footage from the scene of the blast, with men in
military uniforms picking through the wreckage of the bus. Its front half was
mostly blown off, leaving only the metal frame, and bags of belongings were
strewn across the remaining seats.
The channel also showed images from inside a hospital where the wounded were
being treated, including a woman whose black robes had been lifted up, revealing
a bloodsoaked undershirt.
Meanwhile, Hizbullah, which has sent scores of fighters to aid the Syrian regime
against the Islamist-led uprising, issued a statement denouncing the attack.This
"is part of the series of explosions that targets pilgrims in Syria, civilians
in Iraq, believers in Pakistan" and "proves the barbarity of the terrorists," it
said in a statement. “Those who carried out the Damascus bombing are serving the
interests of the Zionist entity and the scheme seeking to fragment the region,”
the party added. Parts of Damascus have remained relatively unscathed by the
fighting raging across much of Syria since an uprising erupted in March 2011.
But rebels regularly fire rockets into the capital from rear bases in the
surrounding countryside, and the city has also been hit by bombings. Despite the
conflict, the road from the Lebanese border to Damascus remains relatively safe,
and Lebanese Shiite pilgrims have continued to visit religious sites in Syria.
More than 200,000 people have been killed in Syria since the conflict started,
and around half of the country's population has been displaced. Agence France
Presse.
Report: Mawlawi still in Ain el-Hilweh,
Visited by his Wife
Naharnet/Fugitive Islamist Shadi al-Mawlawi is still hiding in the Palestinian
refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh in southern Lebanon, reported the pan-Arab daily
al-Hayat on Sunday. Judicial sources told the daily that his wife visited him on
Friday with their four-year-old son Adam. Her movement was monitored by security
forces. She was stopped at al-Madfoun checkpoint on her return trip to the
northern city of Tripoli through Beirut. She was released after her testimony
was taken. Mawlawi's wife admitted that he was still in the refugee camp. On
Wednesday, the fugitive had declared via Twitter that he had left the camp “to
avoid the shed of Muslim blood.”Mawlawi disappeared from Tripoli following
gunbattles between his followers and the Lebanese army in October. Media reports
said last week that he fled the camp disguised in women's clothing and using
fake identification papers, the same way he entered it in November. His location
was a dilemma despite a confirmation by Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq
that the most-wanted suspect fled to the northeastern border town of Arsal and
joined al-Nusra Front ranks. Arsal municipal chief Ali al-Hujeiri rejected the
minister's claims, saying that he only based them on “assumptions and baseless
analyses,” reported the Kuwaiti daily al-Anba on Sunday. He admitted ti the
daily that he does not have any information on whether the fugitive was in the
town, stressing that its residents “will not hesitate in informing the army or
intelligence agencies if they have any information on him.”“Arsal and its locals
refuse to serve as a conduit for fugitives, especially since the municipality is
working on avoiding subjecting the town to any security tensions,” stressed
Hujeiri.
Mosul deteriorates under IS occupation
BAGHDAD — Basma’s phone is always in her pocket. She used to throw it around the
house, but things have changed. She is waiting for a phone call from her father,
who lives in Mosul and was not able to leave with his wife and children for a
safer city.
Summary⎙ Print Mosul has become an impoverished, broken city whose residents
face great risks when they try to contact their loved ones in other Iraqi
cities, fearing their Islamic State occupiers' retaliation.
She got married in Baghdad several years ago and has a close relationship with
her father. She would visit him every month or he would come to the capital to
see her. But the situation changed; the young employee who works at the Iraqi
Ministry of Construction and Housing has not seen her father since June, i.e.,
since the dramatic fall of Mosul at the hands of the Islamic State (IS).
Mosul, a Sunni-majority city, has been completely isolated from its surroundings
for more than a month now; IS cut the Internet and mobile phone networks and the
city's residents became prisoners of the extremist organization that
unreasonably imposes its brutal laws.
Basma’s father, 55, a physician, crosses about 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) to the
mountains near the province of Dahuk in the Kurdistan region to secure coverage
for his mobile phone to call his daughter in Baghdad.
The physician told Al-Monitor over the phone that IS prosecutes anyone who tries
to get network coverage on his mobile phone. “IS wants to fully isolate us from
our surroundings,” he said. His weekly attempts to call his daughter may expose
him to flogging or even the death penalty for violating IS’ rules.
“I am very cautious,” he said. “I hope I don’t get caught. All I can do is
hope.”
It seems that IS has a strong intelligence apparatus: People in Mosul refused to
reveal their names when talking to the media. This is why the physician, Basma’s
father, did not disclose his name.
In light of IS’ powerful intelligence services, social networking activists were
forced about a month ago to close down their sites for fear of being prosecuted
in case IS members succeeded in locating their websites.
The physician said, “IS is similar to the Baath Party in this aspect. … It knows
every little detail.”
Witnesses from Mosul told Al-Monitor by phone that men in Mosul mostly fear
compulsory recruitment by the extremist organization, given the shortage in the
number of its members.
The physician said that many of the men from Mosul who joined IS when it first
entered the city have changed their minds and left it. This cost many of them
their lives when they were caught and executed on the roads and in public
squares.
News circulated that IS imposed compulsory recruitment in the district of Hit,
in Anbar province, to fight in the front rows of IS against government forces.
News reports also indicated that whoever refused to join IS ranks faced the
death penalty.
A young man from Mosul told Al-Monitor over the phone, “We currently dread
recruitment the most, as we see the number of IS members decreasing on the
streets, which may lead IS to resort to recruitment.”
According to the young man, “Most young men are confined within their homes
since IS has made everything forbidden and haram. It even intervenes in the way
we dress and prohibits us from watching soccer games. Its members search our
phones to find out our political and social orientations.”
The economic situation is also deteriorating in Mosul. Vegetables were brought
in by IS from Syria after agricultural lands were destroyed. Household funds
have been exhausted.
Basma’s father, who works in a government hospital, said he has not received his
salary for two months.
Talib Abdul Karim, a member of parliament for Ninevah province, communicates
with Mosul’s residents via mobile phones as well. “The only way to communicate
is to walk to the borders of the provinces of the Kurdistan region to get
network coverage” he said. “Mosul is now at its worst. All sectors are
paralyzed."
Abdul Karim told Al-Monitor, “All services are suspended. Garbage is filling the
city, the health sector sustained great damage and medical staff fled.”
“The city’s residents are refusing IS’ [occupation], given its oppression
against them. Armed groups are being spontaneously formed to carry out
operations against this terrorist organization,” he said.
Sacked Lebanon Casino staff reject new committee to end
standoff
Feb. 01, 2015/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: A group of sacked Casino du Liban employees rejected Sunday a decision
by the board of directors to form a committee to find a solution to a five-day
standoff over their dismissal, after two board members revoked their earlier
resignation over the issue.
George Nakhle and Hicham Naser quit their positions Friday night following a
board meeting that failed to propose any tangible solution to the dispute, but
Saturday went back on their decision. They are now joining a new committee
formed to reconcile the administration and some 191 employees who were sacked as
part of sweeping reforms at the iconic entertainment venue and are now
protesting within the building, forcing it to temporarily close. The committee
is expected to propose compensations for some of the sacked employees and an
early retirement deal for others, according to media reports. However, the
employees have rejected the idea of the committee, and sent a delegation to
discuss the issue Sunday morning with Bishop Boulos Sayyah, representing
Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai.
Labor Minister Sejaan Azzi announced Sunday in an interview with Al-Jadeed that
he had not been informed in advance of the Casino administration’s decision. He
stressed that while reform was necessary for the Casino and all other public
institutions, any solution reached should be fair to the employees too. “The
Central Bank’s Gorvernor [Riad Salameh] is indirectly intervening in the Casino
file to protect the rights of everyone and the reputation of the Casino,” Azzi
said. Political intervention at the Casino has been the norm since it opened in
1959. Many of the employees at Casino du Liban have been hired by influential
political groups in Kesrouan, where the venue is located. Azzi visited the
employee’s protest site in the Casino Friday and suggested that they resume work
temporarily for 15 days until a fair deal was reached. This too has been
rejected by the employees. The minister called on the representatives of both
sides to meet Tuesday at the Labor Ministry to discuss the fate of the workers,
but the striking employees insisted that they would not call off the strike and
reopen the casino until the management reinstates all the fired workers.Casino
Chairman Hamid Kreidi has said the decision to sack them was based on the
recommendation of an international auditing firm hired to cut waste and boost
revenues.
French Envoy, Girault Returns to
Beirut Monday with Low Expectations on Ending Presidential Impasse
Naharnet/Director of the Department of the Middle East and North Africa at the
French Foreign Ministry Jean-François Girault is expected to return to Beirut on
Monday to continue his efforts to achieve a breakthrough in the ongoing deadlock
over the presidential elections, reported the daily An Nahar on Sunday.
Observers ruled out the possibility that the French official would be able to
create a breakthrough in his talks with local figures. They explained that
foreign capitals are “not prepared to abandon the presidential card to France
that is facing a series of failures in its Middle Eastern policies.”“Iran,
should it choose to cooperate to end the impasse, would rather work directly
with the American administration, not mediators, especially not French ones,”
they added. Lebanon has been without a president since May when the term of
Michel Suleiman ended without the election of his successor. Ongoing disputes
between the rival March 8 and 14 camps have thwarted the elections. Girault's
visit on Monday comes in light of his recent talks in Riyadh, Tehran, Washington
and the Vatican over the presidential crisis. He also met with Mustaqbal
Movement leader ex-PM Saad Hariri in Saudi Arabia. Media reports said last week
that the French official decided to suspend his endeavors to reach a
breakthrough regarding the presidential stalemate in Lebanon unless new
developments occur. Girault last visited Lebanon in December, where he met
during his two-day trip prominent Lebanese officials. The French diplomat was
tasked by French President Francois Hollande to try to reach a breakthrough over
the presidential elections in Lebanon.
Corruption the cause of Lebanon’s misery: Rai
The Daily Star/Feb. 01, 2015
BEIRUT: Corruption and a lack of transparency have made Lebanon what it is
today, Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai said Sunday, calling for better protection
of public money and respect of workers’ rights. “Our Lebanese society is passing
through this miserable reality today because of the lack of transparency, the
underestimation of public money waste, the violation of laws in contracts, the
prioritization of private interests ... ignoring the employees’ demands and
turning a deaf ear to their voices,” Rai said during in his Sunday mass speech
at Bkirki’s Cathedral. “It is time to break the corruption cycle, to safeguard
the state’s treasury and to create jobs for youths.” Rai’s comments came in
light of an ongoing protest by 191 former employees of Casino du Liban who were
sacked suddenly last week. The Casino has been shut down by the employees for
five days in order to pressure the administration to reconsider its decision.
Representing the patriarch, Bishop Boulos Sayyah met with a delegation of the
sacked employees after the Sunday mass and heard their point of view on the
issue.
The dispute has been further complicated by the intervention of political
parties, each of whom has a number of affiliated employees inside the Casino’s
bodies. Since its creation in 1959, most of the Casino’s jobs have been filled
according to partition deals between the major parties in Kesrouan, the district
in which it is located
Shadi Mawlawi still in Ain al-Hilweh: report
Feb. 01, 2015/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Fugitive terror suspect Shadi Mawlawi is still in Ain al-Hilweh camp
despite reports to the contrary, according to his recently detained wife, Al-Hayat
newspaper said Sunday. The pan-Arab daily said the Lebanese security forces
caught Mawlawi’s wife and her four-year-old son while they were on their way
back to Tripoli from Sidon’s Palestinian refugee camp, the country's largest.
Al-Hayat quoted “judicial sources” as saying the woman confirmed that Mawlawi
has remained inside the camp, contradicting statements last week about him
having fled to avoid an Army crackdown. Last month, Interior Minister Nouhad
Machnouk claimed Mawlawi had joined militants in the outskirts of Arsal. The
Islamist himself later confirmed the news via his Twitter account, saying he had
left Ain al-Hilweh to avoid causing trouble to the camp’s residents. However,
Arsal Mayor Ali Hujeiri told Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Anbaa in comments published
Sunday that the rumors about Mawlawi’s escape to Arsal or its outskirts were not
based on any strong evidence.
“Arsal refuses to be a pathway or residence for fugitives,” Hujeiri said. The
mayor argued that the Army’s strong presence in the town - both in terms of
troops and intelligence agents - made it impossible for such infiltrations to
happen, especially given Mawlawi is one of the country's most wanted men.
Mawlawi is believed to have been hiding in Ain al-Hilweh since he fled the
northern city of Tripoli when the Army launched a security crackdown on Islamist
militants last year. Lebanon’s judiciary has charged him with operating a
terrorist group with his partner-in-crime Osama Mansour. He is wanted for his
alleged links to the perpetrators of a Jan. 10 double suicide bombing in Jabal
Mohsen districtthat killed at least nine people and wounded more than 30, and
also over his connection to a series of suicide bombing plots last year that
were foiled by the Army.
Israeli Foreign Minister: Third Lebanon war inevitable
The Daily Star/Feb. 01, 2015/BEIRUT: A third war with Lebanon has become
inevitable, Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Sunday, adding that
Hezbollah’s recent attack on the state has changed the rules of the game. "A
fourth operation in the Gaza Strip is inevitable, just as a third Lebanon war is
inevitable," Lieberman told Ynet news, the English-language website of Israeli
newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, in an interview. "There's no doubt the rules of the
game have been changed, what Hezbollah forced upon us. We don't respond, but
rather decide to contain this incident. I think that's completely unreasonable,”
Lieberman said. “Hezbollah is bolder, more determined, more
provocative.”Lieberman called for a “harsh and disproportionate” response after
Hezbollah attacked an Israeli patrol in the occupied Shebaa Farms last week,
killing two soldiers and wounding seven others. The blast was revenge for an
Israeli strike on a convoy in the Syrian town of Qunaitra in the Golan Heights
last month, in which six Hezbollah members and an Iranian Revolutionary Guard
commander were killed. Israel responded to the Shebaa Farms attack by shelling
villages in south Lebanon, causing no casualties for Hezbollah but killing a
Spanish UNIFIL peacekeeper. The Soviet-born Israeli politician also insisted
that another war on Gaza was on the horizon, saying Hamas was already rebuilding
its military capacities. "Don't let them tell us stories about how Hamas is
begging and they're on their knees. We saw 10 rockets being fired at the sea
last week. We see every week how they're rebuilding [their arsenal]," he said.
ISIS in full swing under ex-Iraqi general: 70 deaths in a
month, on the march in 10 countries
DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis February 1, 2015
Saturday night, March 31, the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant capped a month of
atrocities by beheading its second Japanese hostage, Kenjo Goto, a 47-year old
journalist. Jordan vows to do everything its power to save the Jordanian pilot
Lt. Moaz al-Kasasbeh, but it may be too late.
In March alone, the Islamists are known to have killed at least 70 people in 10
targeted European and Middle East countries. This is a modest estimate since
exact figures are not available everywhere - like in Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
ISIS terrorists trailed their horror that month through France, Spain, Belgium,
Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Libya.
US President Barack Obama, who heads a 20-state coalition fighting ISIS in Iraq,
strongly condemned the Goto murder. Secretary of State John Kerry, trying to
sound positive, commended the recovery of the Syrian town of Kobani by Kurdish
forces as “a big deal.”
ISIS was indeed forced to concede defeat in battle under US air strikes. But
Kerry forgot to mention that the battle is far from over: the Islamists pulled
back from Kobani’s districts, but are still pressing hard on the walls of the
town and heavy fighting for its control continues.
If Kobani is the only military gain achieved by US-backed forces in months of
coalition effort, who will be able to stop the brutal ISIS offensive going
forward in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East?
The British government keeps on warning that an Islamist attack is coming soon.
Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said Sunday that this was a “generational
struggle that must be fought in other parts of the world in addition to the
Middle East.”
It was obvious from these lame comments that the West is totally at a loss for
ways to pre-empt the thrusting danger.
Some Western intelligence agencies have sought cold comfort by pointing to the
Islamists’ willingness to negotiate the release of the Jordanian pilot held
hostage since his capture in Syria in December as a symptom of weakness,
signaling its readiness to part with its murderous image. Others judged the
latest video clips unprofessional and a sign that ISIS leadership was in
disarray.
Neither of these judgments is supported by the facts.
debkafile’s counter-terrorism and intelligence sources report that the high
command of the Islamic State functions at present with machinelike efficiency in
pursuit of its goals. The name of Abu Baqr al-Baghdadi has been circulated
widely as ruler of the Islamic “caliphate” he founded in parts of Syria and
Iraq. But behind the scenes, he is assisted by a tight inner group of 12-15
former high officers from the Baath army which served the Saddam Hussein up
until the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. Members of this group ranged in rank from
lieutenant-colonel to general.
Ex-Maj. Gen. Abu Ali al-Anbari, its outstanding figure, acts as Al Baghdadi
senior lieutenant.
He also appears to be the brain that has charted ISIS’s current military
strategy which, our sources learn, focuses on three major thrusts: the
activation of sleeper cells in Europe for coordinated terrorist operations:
multiple, synchronized attacks in the Middle East along a line running from
Tripoli, Libya, through Egyptian Suez Canal cities and encompassing the Sinai
Peninsula; and the full-dress Iraqi-Syrian warfront, with the accent currently
on the major offensive launched Thursday, March 29, to capture the big Iraq oil
town of Kirkuk.
debkafile was first to report the arrival in Sinai during the first week of
December of a group of ISIS officers from Iraq to take command of their latest
convert, Ansar Beit Al-Miqdas.
Another former Iraqi army officer was entrusted with coordinating ISIS
operations between the East Libyan Islamist contingent and the Sinai movement.
Their mission is to topple the rule of President Abdel-Fatteh El-Sisi.
The imported Iraqi command made its presence felt in Libya Tuesday, Jan. 27 with
the seizure of the luxury Corinthia Hotel in Tripoli and execution of the
foreigners taken there, including an American and a British man. Two days later,
ISIS terrorists fanned out across Sinai for their most devastating attack ever
on Egyptian military and security forces. They launched simultaneous attacks in
five towns, Rafah on the border of the Gaza Strip, El Arish and Sheikh Suweid in
the north and the Suez Canal cities of Port Said and Suez to the west – killing
some 50 Egyptian personnel and injuring more than double that figure.
ISIS strategists, not content with these "successes," are still in full thrust
and believed to be planning to expand their operations and hit Israel – whether
from the south or the north.
At least 6 dead in Lebanese pilgrim bus blast in Damascus
The Daily Star/Feb. 01, 2015/BEIRUT: A blast on a Lebanese bus carrying Shiite
pilgrims in a central district of the Syrian capital killed at least six people
and wounded up to 20 Sunday, media reports said. A Twitter account associated
with the Nusra Front claimed responsibility for the blast, saying one of the
group's members blew himself up inside the bus. However, Al-Manar is reporting
that the bus was not struck by a suicide attack but by an explosive device
planted towards the front end of the bus. The Syrian Observatory for Human
Rights reported that seven were killed and 20 wounded in the attack, which took
place in the Souq al-Hamadiyeh neighbourhood of Damascus. Skynews Arabia
confirmed the Lebanese media reports saying the bus was Lebanese and carried
Lebanese Shiite visitors.
The explosion was also reported by Syrian state media, with the official SANA
news agency saying at least four people had been killed and 19 wounded.
Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said the bus was reportedly carrying
Shiite Muslim pilgrims visiting religious sites in the capital. Parts of
Damascus have remained relatively unscathed by the fighting raging in much of
Syria since an uprising erupted in March 2011 But rebels regularly fire rockets
into the capital from rear bases in the surrounding countryside and the city has
also been hit by bombings. More than 200,000 people have been killed in Syria
since the conflict started, and around half of the country's population has been
displaced.
Imad Mughniyeh and Hezbollah's Shadow
War: A Washington Institute Backgrounder
Matthew Levitt/Washington Institute
January 30, 2015
In January 2015, an airstrike in Syria – reported to have been carried out by
Israel – killed several Hezbollah operatives, including Jihad Mughniyeh, son of
the Lebanese terror group's late operational mastermind, Imad Mughniyeh. The
elder Mughniyeh played a crucial role in Hezbollah's terrorist strategy,
tactics, and tradecraft, as well as its outreach to Iran and to Palestinian
terror organizations, from Hezbollah's founding until his own death in a
Damascus bombing in 2008. At the time, Hezbollah leaders promised to avenge
Mughniyeh's death, but the failure of initial attempts to carry out vengeance
attacks helped draw Hezbollah even closer to Iran's Qods Force - a relationship
that helped set the stage for the Lebanese group's deepening involvement in the
Syrian conflict. As Hezbollah leaders again promise retribution for the death of
a Mughniyeh, here is a collection of key background documents tracing Imad
Mughniyeh's influence on Hezbollah in both life and death.
Hezbollah: The Global Footprint of Lebanon's Party of God
In the definitive study of Hezbollah's history and operations, Matthew Levitt
details Imad Mughniyeh's pivotal role in establishing and refining the group's
terrorist strategy, tactics, and tradecraft, from bombings and kidnappings in
1980s Beirut to operations around the world in the 2000s. Read more.
The Origins of Hezbollah
When Hezbollah operatives killed 241 American servicemen with a truck bomb in
Beirut in 1983, Imad Mughniyeh coordinated the attack and was watching through
binoculars from a nearby building. Read more.
Who Was Imad Mughniyeh? with David Schenker
Born in 1962, Imad Mughniyeh became a sniper in Yasser Arafat's forces in 1976
and has been implicated in some of the most spectacular terrorist attacks of the
1980s and 1990s, earning him a place on the FBI and EU's most wanted lists. He
served as special operations chief for Hizballah's international operations and
as the group's primary liaison to Iran's security and intelligence services.
Read more.
Imad Mughniyeh's Legacy Six Years On
Today, Hezbollah blames Israel for the Damascus bombing that killed Imad
Mughniyeh. But at the time, even as Hezbollah publicly charged that Israel was
to blame for the attack -- both Hezbollah and Iran privately suspected that the
Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad may have played a role in Mughniyeh's death.
Read more.
Israel vs. Hezbollah, Spy vs. Spy
In the ongoing intelligence war between Israel and Hezbollah, financial
information gained in U.S. undercover operations may be playing a key role. Read
more.
Hizballah and the Qods Force in Iran's Shadow War with the West
Hezbollah's early efforts to avenge Imad Mughniyeh's death with retalliatory
terror attacks floundered, leading the group's leadership and their Iranian
partners to reassess how they would prosecute, both separately and together, a
three-tiered shadow war targeting Israeli, Jewish, American, smetimes even
British interests worldwide. Read more.
Hezbollah’s Strategic Shift: A Global Terrorist Threat
As recently as 2013, Hezbollah terror operations in Europe and the Middle East
were tied to the group's campaign to avenge Imad Mughniyeh's death. Read more.
Iranian Doublespeak on the Anniversary of the AMIA Bombing
When senior Iranian leaders decided in 1993 to attack a Jewish center in
Argentina, Tehran's intelligence chief Ali Fallahian turned to Hezbollah's Imad
Mughniyeh to execute the attack. The bombing, which took place in July 1994,
killed 85 and wounded more than 300 in Buenos Aires. Read more.
Iran’s Support for Terrorism in the Middle East
A shared desire for revenge – for the death of Imad Mughniyeh and for attacks on
Iranian nuclear scientists – has strenghthened Hezbollah and Tehran's
longstanding and intimate relationship, making their combined operational
capabilities that much more dangerous. Read more.
Hezbollah's West Bank Terror Network
When violence broke out in the West Bank in 2000, Iran turned to Hezbollah to
bolster the operational capabilities of Palestinian militant groups such as
Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Imad Mughniyeh's "Unit 1800" was the
linghpin of that effort. Read more.
Iran’s human rights failure
By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL/J.Post/02/01/2015
HRW report details Rouhani’s lack of progress, broken promises
The Islamic Republic of Iran’s human rights record remained atrocious under the
so-called moderate President Hassan Rouhani, according to a newly released Human
Rights Watch report on Wednesday.
The New York-based HRW described the conditions as “dire” in Iran and wrote that
the country’s intelligence and judiciary “carried out serious rights abuses
throughout 2014.”
The report’s finding are a far cry from Rouhani’s 2013 pre-election campaign
promise that “all ethnicities, all religions, even religious minorities, must
feel justice.”
The US and Europe have been reluctant to criticize Iran’s widespread human
rights violations in order to not disturb, from the West’s perspective, the
delicate negotiations to end Iran’s illicit nuclear weapons program.
HRW wrote, “Executions, especially for drug-related offenses, continued at a
high rate.
Security and intelligence forces arrested journalists, bloggers and social media
activists, and revolutionary courts handed down heavy sentences against them.”
Iranian media sources said at least 200 prisoners were killed by October 2014
“but opposition sources said they carried out another 400 unannounced
executions. Some executions were public.”
Iran’s regime imposes the death penalty for offenses including, “insulting the
Prophet,” apostasy, same-sex relations and adultery.
The report noted that “Officials apparently stepped up their crackdown on
dissent through the Internet.” One infamous cased involved the May arrest of
four men and three women showing them dancing to the song “Happy,” which was
posted on YouTube. Iran’s said the young people were involved in “illicit
relations.”
Rouhani has not made any effort to stop the violent repression of labor unions.
According to HRW, “the judiciary continued to target independent and
unregistered trade unions. On May 1, police attacked and arrested at least 25
workers who were protesting poor wages and labor conditions outside the Labor
Ministry and a Tehran bus terminal. Police took the workers to Evin Prison
before releasing them. Several of them face charges related to illegal
gathering.”
Misogynistic laws and policies remain the norm in Iran. HRW wrote, “In 2014,
authorities announced or implemented discriminatory policies, including
restricting the employment of women in coffee shops, certain restaurants and
other public spaces and limiting access to family planning as part of official
measures to boost Iran’s population.”
Iranian women face disparate treatment in marriage, divorce, inheritance and
child custody.
“Regardless of her age, a woman cannot marry without the approval of her male
guardian, and women generally cannot pass on their Iranian nationality to a
foreign-born spouse or to their children. Child marriage, though not the norm,
continues, as the law allows girls to marry at 13 and boys at age 15, and at
younger ages if authorized by a judge,” wrote HRW.
Non-Muslim minorities face extreme repression.
HRW wrote Iran’s regime “denies freedom of religion to Baha’is…and discriminates
against them. At least 136 Baha’is were held in Iran’s prisons as of May 2014.
State authorities also desecrated Baha’i cemeteries, including one in Shiraz,
which the authorities began excavating in April.
Security and intelligence forces also continued to target Christian converts
from Islam, Persian-speaking Protestant and evangelical congregations, and
members of the home church movement. Many faced charges such as ‘acting against
the national security’ and ‘propaganda against the state.’” The ongoing severe
violation of human rights and Rouhani’s pre-election promises reflect a regime
that is neither serious about honoring its basic human rights norms and
statements that it will not build a nuclear weapons device.
**Benjamin Weinthal reports on European affairs for The Jerusalem Post and is a
fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Sisi: "Egypt faces long, tough battle against militants"
By REUTERS/02/01/2015
President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said on Saturday that Egypt faces a long, hard
battle against militancy, days after one of the bloodiest attacks on security
forces in years.
"This battle will be difficult, strong, evil and will take a long time," he said
in comments broadcast on state television after meeting Egypt's top military
officers.
On Thursday night, four separate attacks on security forces in North Sinai were
among the worst in the country in years. Islamic State's Egyptian wing, Sinai
Province, claimed the killing of at least 30 soldiers and police officers. Sisi
said Egypt was confronting the "strongest secret organisation in the world", a
reference to the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood.
Then army chief, Sisi removed Brotherhood leader Mohamed Morsi from the
presidency in July of 2013 after mass protests against Morsi's rule. The
military takeover was followed by a fierce crackdown on the movement, which says
it is committed to peaceful activism. Egyptian officials make no distinction
between the Brotherhood, Islamic State, al-Qaida and Sinai Province, previously
called Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis, arguing the groups pose a major threat because they
share the same ideology. The Brotherhood, which accuses Sisi of staging a coup
and robbing Morsi of power, said in a statement from its office in Britain that
it was appalled by the killings in Sinai. It accused the army of displacing
people in Sinai and burning and destroying cities. "There is no solution to this
situation, except by returning the army to its barracks," it said.
Islamist militants based in Egypt's Sinai region, which has a border with Gaza,
have killed hundreds of police and soldiers since Morsi's political demise. The
insurgency has spread to other parts of Egypt, the most populous Arab country
Hours before Sisi's comments, an Egyptian court banned the armed wing of the
Palestinian group Hamas - an offshoot of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood - and listed
it as a terrorist organization.
ISIS executes second Japanese hostage
By REUTERS \
01/31/2015 22:34
Islamic State militants said on Saturday they had beheaded a second Japanese
hostage, journalist Kenji Goto, after the failure of international efforts to
secure his release through a prisoner swap.
The hardline Islamist group, which controls large parts of Syria and Iraq,
released a video which seemed to show the beheaded body of Goto and threatened
further attacks on Japanese targets. Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said
the video appeared to be genuine.
Islamic State had said Goto, 47, was held along with a Jordanian pilot. Efforts
to win their release had focused on the possible release of an Iraqi would-be
suicide bomber jailed in Jordan 10 years ago. The video did not mention the
pilot.
Japan condemned the actions of the militants and said Prime Minister Shinzo
Abe's cabinet would meet in response to the video, which showed a hooded man
standing over Goto with a knife to his throat, followed by footage of a head put
on the back of a human body.
The video was released exactly a week after footage appearing to show the
beheaded body of another Japanese hostage, Haruna Yukawa.
"I feel strong indignation at this inhumane and contemptible act of terrorism,"
a grim-faced Abe said in brief remarks to reporters in Japan. "I will never
forgive these terrorists."
"Japan will work with the international community to bring those responsible for
this crime to justice," Abe added, reiterating that Japan would not give in to
terrorism.
President Barack Obama said the United States condemned the "heinous murder" and
would continue to work with allies to destroy the hardline Islamist group.
Britain also condemned the killing.
Islamic State's threats to kill the group's Japanese hostages were issued after
Abe announced earlier this month $200 million in non-military aid for countries
contending with Islamic State.
Addressing Abe, the militant in the video said: "Because of your reckless
decision to take part in an unwinnable war, this knife will not only slaughter
Kenji, but will also carry on and cause carnage wherever your people are found.
So let the nightmare for Japan begin."
NO WORD ON PILOT
The militant had the same British accent as the man featured in previous Islamic
State videos showing beheadings. Goto wore an orange jumpsuit like Islamic State
captives in past footage.
The landscape in the video showed a hill and land covered in scrub, and appeared
different to the desert setting of previous videos.
Abe's government had put high priority on seeking the release of Goto, a veteran
war correspondent captured by the militants in late October when he went to
Syria seeking Yukawa's release. Yukawa, 42, was seized by militants in August
after going to Syria to launch a security company.
Goto's mother Junko Ishido, who earlier had appealed for his safe release, said,
"I am too upset to find the words to express myself. My son's last act was to go
to Syria to help a fellow Japanese (Yukawa). So I want people to understand my
son's kindness and courage."
Goto's older brother, Junichi Goto, said, "I had hoped to give thanks for his
return alive. But, as his brother, this outcome is very regrettable."Islamic
State, an offshoot of al Qaeda, has beheaded a number of Western journalists and
aid workers, saying they were paying the price for their governments' fight
against the group.
It has also killed many local people, through beheadings, stonings and
shootings, accusing them of violating their hardline interpretation of Islamic
law.
There was no mention in the one-minute video of Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kasaesbeh
who was seized by Islamic State after his jet crashed in northeast Syria in
December during a bombing mission against the militants.
An audio message that appeared to be from Goto earlier this week said Kasaesbeh
would be killed if Jordan did not free Iraqi Sajida al-Rishawi, in jail for her
role in a 2005 suicide bomb attack that killed 60 people in the Jordanian
capital Amman.
WAR CORRESPONDENT
Goto began working as a full-time war correspondent in 1996 and had established
a reputation as a careful and reliable operator for Japanese broadcasters,
including NHK.
In October, Goto's wife had a baby, the couple's second child. He had an older
daughter from a previous marriage, people who know the family said.
Yukawa was captured in August outside the Syrian city of Aleppo. Friends say
Goto travelled from Tokyo to Istanbul and from there to Syria, sending a message
on Oct. 25 that he had crossed the border and was safe.
"Whatever happens, this is my responsibility," Goto said on a video recorded
shortly before he set out for Raqqa. That was the last time he was seen before
an Islamic State video released on Jan. 20 appearing to show both Japanese men
and threatening to kill them unless the group received $200 million in ransom.
Question: "Why do the four Gospels seem to present a different message of
salvation than the rest of the New Testament?"
GotQuestions.org
Answer: We must keep in mind that the Bible is intended to be taken as a whole.
The books preceding the Four Gospels are anticipatory, and the books which
follow are explanatory. Throughout the whole Bible, what God requires is
faith—Genesis 15:6; Psalm 2:12; Habakkuk 2:4; Matthew 9:28; John 20:27;
Ephesians 2:8; Hebrews 10:39. Salvation comes not by our own works but by
trusting what God does on our behalf.
Each of the Gospels has its own emphasis on the ministry of Christ. Matthew,
writing to a Jewish audience, emphasizes Jesus’ fulfillment of Old Testament
prophecy, proving that He is the long-awaited Messiah. Mark writes a fast-paced,
condensed account, recording Jesus’ miraculous deeds and not recording His long
discourses. Luke portrays Jesus as the remedy of the world’s ills, emphasizing
His perfect humanity and humane concern for the weak, the suffering, and the
outcast. John emphasizes Jesus’ deity by selecting many conversations and
sayings of Jesus on the subject and also including “signs” that prove He is the
Son of God.
The Four Gospels work together to provide a complete testimony of Jesus, a
beautiful portrait of the God-Man. Although the Gospels differ slightly in
theme, the central Subject is the same. All present Jesus as the One who died to
save sinners. All record His resurrection. Whether the writers presented Jesus
as the King, the Servant, the Son of Man, or the Son of God, they had the common
goal—that people believe in Him.
We’ll delve into the theology of the Gospels now. John includes many statements
of faith and commands to believe. These inclusions fit his stated purpose, “that
you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing
you might have life through His name” (20:31). The other Gospels (the Synoptics)
are no less concerned that we trust in Christ. Their appeals to faith are less
overt but are just as genuine.
Jesus proclaims the need for righteousness, and He warns of the penalty of sin,
which is hell. However, Jesus always presents God as the standard of
righteousness and Himself as the means of righteousness—without Christ,
righteousness is unattainable and hell is inevitable. The Sermon on the Mount
(Matthew 5-7) is a case in point:
- Jesus begins the Sermon on the Mount with a description of the blessed life
(5:1-12). The Beatitudes are not telling us “how to” be righteous, but are
simply describing righteousness.
- He presents Himself as the fulfillment of the Old Testament law (5:17-18).
This is a key verse because, to earn our own righteousness, we must fulfill the
law; here, Jesus says that He will do it for us.
- He says that no amount of our own good works will gain us entrance to heaven
(5:20). This is another important statement in the sermon. The Pharisees were
the most religious people of the day, but Jesus says even they are not good
enough to enter heaven. Jesus will go on to say that it’s not a religious system
that saves, but He Himself.
- He “raises the bar” for righteousness according to God’s standard, instead of
man’s interpretation of the law (5:21-48). He explains God’s intent behind seven
Old Testament laws. The bar is raised so high as to make everyone, even the most
dedicated religious practitioner, guilty before God.
- He describes three popular religious activities—almsgiving, prayer, and
fasting—as hypocritical when practiced by the outwardly religious (6:1-18).
Jesus’ focus, as with the seven laws He just mentioned, is the heart condition
of man, not the works we can see.
- He warns that there will be “many” in the day of judgment who will have
performed great works for God yet will be turned away from heaven (7:21-23). The
reason given is that Jesus never “knew” them. There was no familial
relationship, only “good” works, which is not enough.
- Jesus concludes the Sermon on the Mount with the audacious statement that He
alone is the foundation for building one’s religious life (7:24-27). It is an
appeal to trust “these sayings of Mine” enough to abandon all other foundations.
To summarize, in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus meticulously deconstructs the
pharisaical religion of good works, points to a holiness greater than our own,
and offers Himself as the sole basis of religion. Accepting what Jesus says in
this sermon requires faith in His Person.
Matthew’s Gospel goes on to emphasize faith in the following verses: 8:10, 13,
26; 9:2, 22, 28-29; 12:21; 13:58; 14:31; 15:28; 16:8; 17:17; and 18:6. Also,
Matthew includes a very clear presentation of Jesus as the Son of God in this
exchange: “He said to them, ‘But who do you say that I am?’ Simon Peter answered
and said, ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ Jesus answered and
said to him, ‘Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not
revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.’” (Matthew 16:15-17).
Mark’s Gospel contains the following references to faith in Christ: 1:15; 2:5;
4:40; 5:34, 36; 6:6; 9:19, 23, 42; 10:52; 11:23; and 16:14. In Luke’s Gospel we
see these verses promoting faith in Christ: 1:1; 5:20; 7:9, 50; 8:12, 25, 48,
50; 9:41; 12:28, 46; 17:19; 18:8, 42; and 24:25. As we continue to see scripture
as a unified whole, we will see that there is only one message of salvation, and
the Four Gospels provide the basis for that message.
The Epistles which follow the Gospels elaborate upon the same theme: salvation
by faith in Christ. The overarching theme of Romans is the righteousness that
comes through God and the doctrine of justification by grace through faith. The
central theme of Galatians and Colossians is the same. The book of Hebrews
stresses the pre-eminence and perfection of Christ, the “author and perfecter of
our faith.” First and Second Corinthians, Ephesians, Philippians, 1 and 2
Thessalonians, the pastoral epistles of Timothy and Titus, Philemon, James, 1
and 2 Peter, all describe the holy living, both personally and corporately
within the church, and the hope for the future which should be the natural
result of life in Christ. The three epistles of John reiterate the basics of the
faith and warn against those who would call them into question, also the main
theme of Jude. Revelation, the final book of the New Testament, presents the
last act of God’s plan for mankind and the fate of those who hold onto the same
faith expounded in the entirety of the New Testament—faith in Christ alone.
Egypt's turning on Hamas won't solve Israel's Gaza problem
By Zvi Bar'el/Haaretz/ Feb. 01, 2015
For the first time, an Arab leader is challenging the view that 'resistance'
organizations fighting Israel necessarily serve Arab interests.
“A war is being waged against Egypt,” Egypt's President Abdel al-Fattah al-Sissi
declared before returning from this weekend’s African Union summit in Ethiopia.
“The army will set the rules and the principles the country will live by, and it
is prepared to pay the price.” A heavy price: Last week, at least 30 military
personnel and civilians were killed in one of the worst terror attacks ever on
the army in Sinai. Two days later, a bomb exploded on an Egyptian train.
Terror has hit Cairo and Alexandria as well, and also the Libya border area. The
army has had some success in this war of attrition, whose broad dispersal makes
it difficult to defeat. The army has cleared a one-kilometer swath along the
border with Gaza, leveling over 1,200 homes, and destroyed tunnels under the
border. It launches frequent attacks on terrorist strongholds in Sinai, staffs
area roadblocks and has carried out numerous arrests. But that has not stopped
the terror cells, which depend in part on weapons smuggled from Libya and
supporters who do not live in Sinai.
The alleged enemy is well-defined: The Muslim Brotherhood and its progeny, such
as Hamas, have become the “usual suspects” — even when Ansar Beit Almaqdis
(“champions of Jerusalem”), which has shifted its allegiance from Al-Qaida to
Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL) claims responsibility for attacks.
The Muslim Brotherhood has been declared an illegal terror organization, and on
Saturday an Egyptian court also declared the military wing of Hamas a terrorist
movement.
That decision, which came a year after the court declared Hamas an organization
that supports terrorism and barred it from operating in Egypt, will not provide
a turning point in how terrorism is fought. Even in the past, Egypt had no
problem in arresting Hamas activists or putting them on trial. And the
prosecution of deposed President Mohammed Morsi is based in part on the
assistance that he received from Hamas when he fled imprisonment in January
2011. Even without a judicial decision, Egypt has long sketched out its aims
around Gaza and the Hamas regime. The closure of the Rafah crossing between Gaza
and Egypt is an inseparable part of this fight, as is the ongoing deferral of
the convening of a conference on the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.
But the political aspects of this decision are no less important that the
military ones. For the first time, an Arab leader is challenging the common view
that “resistance” organizations that are fighting Israel necessarily serve Arab
interests. The “sanctity” of the struggle against Israel is no longer
justification for the existence of an organization that turns its arms against
Egypt. Here Sissi is making it clear, without mincing words, that the
Palestinian issue is important in his view only to extent that it doesn’t
threaten Egypt. Any Arab or Muslim country that wishes to provide aid to the
Gaza Strip or Hamas now faces a dilemma in that Egypt would now consider such
assistance to be support for a terrorist organization.
Israel can indeed be satisfied with the fact that Egypt is the only Arab country
that has declared Hamas as a terrorist movement. (The Muslim Brotherhood is
considered a terrorist movement in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, in
addition to Egypt). But the Egyptian designation will not solve Israel’s own
problems with Hamas. In Israel, apparently more than in Egypt, it is clear that
economic pressure on the Gaza Strip, the continued blockade and delays in
reconstruction in the territory could reignite the strip and even lead to
another round of violence on top of last summer’s war. Not only are Hamas
spokesmen warning over such a prospect; so are senior officials in the Israeli
defense establishment.
Hamas ready to cooperate with Iran 'to
destroy Israeli occupation'
By KHALED ABU TOAMEH/J.Post
02/01/2015 18:31
Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar on Sunday called on Iran to provide his movement with
additional funds and weapons to enable it to “destroy Israeli occupation.”Zahar
told the Hezbollah TV station Al-Manar that Hamas was prepared to cooperate with
Iran “for the sake of Palestine.”Zahar’s remarks came amid reports that Hamas
and Iran have agreed to restore their relations, which were strained following
the Islamist movement’s refusal to support the regime of Syrian President Bashar
Assad. Sources close to Hamas said that the movement’s Doha-based leader, Khaled
Mashaal, is expected to visit Tehran in the coming weeks as part of the
rapprochement between the two sides.The sources confirmed that Iran has agreed
to resume financial aid to Hamas in the aftermath of last summer’s Operation
Protective Edge.
In recent weeks, two Hamas delegations visited Tehran and held talks with senior
Iranian government officials for the first time since the beginning of the civil
war in Syria. Hamas has also been working to mend fences with Hezbollah. Last
weekend, representatives of Hamas and Hezbollah met in Beirut to discuss
cooperation between the two parties. The Hamas delegation was headed by Ahmed
Abdel Hadi, while the Hezbollah team was led by Hasan Huballah, according to
reports in the Lebanese media.
According to the reports, the two sides “affirmed the need for consolidating
cooperation and preventing tensions (between the two sides).” Hamas leaders
recently sent letters of condolences to Hezbollah chief Hasan Nasrallah over the
killing of some senior Hezbollah operatives in the Syrian part of the Golan
Heights. In their letters, the Hamas leaders stressed the importance of
cooperation with Hezbollah in the fight against Israel. Zahar, in the interview
with the Hezbollah TV station, called on Nasrallah to coordinate with Hamas with
regards to attacks against Israel from the Lebanese border.