LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
September 13/14
Bible Quotation for today/No slave
can serve two masters
Saint Luke 16,13-17: "No slave can serve two masters; for a slave will
either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise
the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.’ The Pharisees, who were lovers
of money, heard all this, and they ridiculed him. So he said to them, ‘You
are those who justify yourselves in the sight of others; but God knows your
hearts; for what is prized by human beings is an abomination in the sight of
God. ‘The law and the prophets were in effect until John came; since then
the good news of the kingdom of God is proclaimed, and everyone tries to
enter it by force. But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away, than
for one stroke of a letter in the law to be dropped."
Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on September 12 and 13/14
Unsavory Bedfellows المرافقون البغيضون/By: Lee Smith/The Weekly Standard/September 13/14
A coalition of 40 countries to fight ISIS/By: Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/September 13/14
Iran, the U.S. helped ISIS become a monster/By: Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/September 13/14
Lebanese Related News published on September 12 and 13/14
Prominent Delegation Travels to Doha ahead of PM Visit as Hujeiri Ends Negotiations with Gunmen
Ibrahim flies to Doha ahead of Salam’s visit
Support Group for Lebanon to Meet on Sidelines of U.N.
Assembly, Says Permanent Representative
U.S. pledges $103.8M in aid to Lebanon
Asiri calls for swift election of president
Alkarssifi and the lost archive of Baalbek
A literary feast of disparate flavors
Judge to announce if STL can try media
Lebanese Forces MP Zahara, blasts Rai over presidential vacuum remarks
Alain Aoun: Importance of parliamentary elections
Mixture of fear and defiance emanates from Hermel
Surrogacy not an option in Lebanon
Alain Aoun: Parliamentary elections could solve impasse
Lebanon’s interest rates to rise in 2015
Inflation may be dormant, but it’s not dead
Army in Tripoli Raids as Local Group Denies Pledging
Allegiance to IS
Man Held after Threatening 3 Children with 'Slaughter'
in Video
Israel Sets up Reconnaissance Balloon near Mays al-Jabal
Jumblat Rejects Self-Security, Inquires about U.S. Campaign against Jihadists
Bulldozers Stolen by Jihadists in Arsal, Taken to Mountains
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on September 12 and 13/14
Meet the man leading America’s anti-ISIS push, Retired Marine Gen. John Allen
Kerry says Iran excluded from anti-ISIS fight
Australia raises threat level to ‘high’ on Iraq, Syria
French president in Iraq to support new government
U.S. warplanes to fly from Iraqi base: Pentagon
Iran questions ‘sincerity’ of anti-ISIS coalition
Al-Nusra frees kidnapped U.N. peacekeepers
Take the time out of homemade beef ragu and pasta
Syrian troops capture key central town
Scotland independence polls put ‘No’ camp ahead
Iran wants UN to condemn Israeli drone
Mortar from Syria explodes in Golan Heights
Report: IDF to discharge reservists from elite intel unit who refuse to serve in West Bank
Thousands of Israeli-Arabs rally against Islamic State
knife-wielding Beduin on army base in South
Sana’a-Houthi talks “unresolved”: source
US, Gulf and Arab allies agree strategy to counter ISIS
Alain Aoun: Parliamentary elections could solve impasse
Wassim Mroueh| The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Holding parliamentary elections on time, even if that means their taking
place before presidential polls, would break Lebanon’s political deadlock,
according to MP Alain Aoun. Speaking to The Daily Star in an interview at his
office in Beirut, Aoun dismissed as mere pretexts the security concerns some
have pointed to as a reason for delaying the general elections. Instead, he
said, going to the polls in November was vital. “Parliamentary elections could
be the start of the solution. They will produce facts, particularly on the
Christian level, which should be reflected in the presidential election,” said
Aoun, who is part of Michel Aoun’s Change and Reform parliamentary bloc. By
determining which Christian group enjoyed the strongest representation in the
country, he said it would become clear who was eligible to have a strong say
over who should be Lebanon’s new president, hopefully bringing to an end a
nearly four-month power vacuum in one of the country’s top posts. “If all
parties recognize these facts and acknowledge the result of parliamentary
elections, then they will lead to a solution,” Aoun said, adding that once a new
president was elected, a new government could be formed and the country’s state
institutions could be revived. The Future Movement opposes the idea of holding
parliamentary elections before a president has been elected, arguing that this
could lead to total power vacuum. According to the Constitution, the current
government would have to resign once a new Parliament is elected and Lebanon
would have to wait for another Cabinet to be appointed. The current Cabinet took
nearly 11 months to form, and without a president, there would be no one to hold
consultations with MPs over the nomination of a new prime minister, as
stipulated by the Constitution.
While Aoun admitted that “the situation will not be comfortable,” he said that
total vacuum would not grip the country. “We will have a new Parliament and a
caretaker government. Parliament will have the duty to elect a president.”
Above all, Aoun emphasized that the fragile security situation in Lebanon was
not a valid excuse to delay parliamentary elections.
Last month, Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk said security services had warned
against holding parliamentary elections due to instability in the country. “It
is shocking not to have elections in the entire country just because there is a
security problem in a limited geographical area, given that elections took place
in countries like Syria and Iraq,” Aoun said, referring to the border town of
Arsal. The northeastern town has been volatile ever since last month, when
militants from ISIS and the Nusra Front occupied it for five days, and captured
more than 30 Army soldiers and policemen. The Nusra Front has since released
seven and ISIS has executed two, leaving at least 22 still in captivity. The
perceived slowness of the government to solve the issue has ignited tensions
across the country.
“If there is a sensitive situation in a certain district, this does not apply
for other districts,” he said.
“I believe that the reasons [behind the proposed extension of Parliament’s term]
are political rather than security-related. Some believe that the status quo in
the country should not change until the picture in the region becomes clear.”
On the subject of the captured men, Aoun said that the latest meeting of a
specially formed crisis cell working toward their release had been productive.
At the meeting, top security officials were tasked with laying down a plan to
bring back order and security to Lebanon, particularly in Arsal. “This came
after a hesitant stance which unfortunately wasted time and raised losses,” Aoun
said.
The Cabinet should be able to use a combination of indirect negotiations with
the militants, mediation and military force in order to solve the problem,
according to Aoun. But the situation in Arsal should not be used as a pretext to
delay an election, he said, as this would involve extending the term of
Parliament for a second time, which the Change and Reform bloc staunchly
opposes. Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun and then-President Michel
Sleiman filed challenges to last May’s extension before the Constitutional
Council, but the body could not meet to look into these challenges due to the
lack of a quorum because Shiite and Druze members boycotted the session.
Asked whether he believed another extension of Parliament’s term was inevitable,
Aoun said: “If there is a huge majority in favor of extension, I believe we will
experience a scenario similar to the one of last year.” One of the biggest
obstacles to the Parliament-presidential election conundrum is the lack of a
consensus over a presidential candidate. March 8 party members have largely
refused to attend voting sessions for a new president until a figure has been
agreed on beforehand. March 8’s candidate is Michel Aoun – but he is
controversial and divisive. Some have accused him of obstructing presidential
elections by refusing to withdraw his candidacy, something MP Aoun vehemently
denied. March 14 is supporting Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea in his bid
for the top Christian role in the country.
Aoun also talked about a proposal made by the FPM’s leader in June, which would
amend the Constitution to allow the president to be elected via a popular vote,
as a way of ensuring proper Christian representation in the voting process.
“Get us a way in which Christians would have a strong say in the election of a
president, whether General Aoun or anybody else, and then the problem will be
solved,” MP Aoun said. “We are raising a fundamental problem. Are the Christians
having a say in presidential election based on our sectarian system? The
mechanism by which presidents have been elected since the [1989] Taif Agreement
is marginalizing the will of Christians. We now want to regain this will. “But
we got a negative response,” he said, referring to the March 14 coalition’s
position on the proposal. He dismissed an initiative announced by the March 14
coalition earlier this month, in which it voiced its readiness to agree with
March 8 rivals on a consensus president other than Aoun or Geagea, as not having
provided a real solution.
“It is pushing those who represent Christians furthest away from the
presidential election ... this marginalizes Christians rather than boosting
their presence.”Aoun said an agreement on a president who truly represented
Christians was another way to ensure that Christians would be properly
represented by the final choice. For Aoun, the need to have such a president was
not about placing Michel Aoun in the post, but rather was a necessary condition
that should be fulfilled whoever the president was.Separately, Aoun reiterated
his group’s opposition to establishing Syrian refugee camps inside Lebanon. “We
do not want to encourage Syrians to stay ... Establishing camps inside Lebanon
will gradually make the presence of Syrian refugees permanent.” However, he said
that his bloc was not against the establishment of refugee camps in the
no-man’s-land between Lebanon and Syria’s borders, something that is likely to
soon become a reality.
Support Group for Lebanon to Meet on Sidelines of U.N. Assembly, Says Permanent
Representative
Naharnet/Nawaf Salam, Lebanon's Permanent Representative to the U.N., that a
meeting will be held for the International Support Group for Lebanon on the
sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, which will be opening its sessions in
New York on September 16. Salam said, in comments published in al-Mustaqbal
newspaper on Friday, that the meeting will be held to extend further support to
Lebanon and its stability and to fortify the capabilities of the army. “U.N.
chief Ban Ki-moon had called for the meeting that will focus on the Syrian
refugees crisis, beefing up support to the Lebanese army and strengthening its
economy,” he pointed out.
The support group was set up in New York in September 2013 on the sidelines of
the 68th session of the General Assembly to help Beirut deal with the
implications of the brutal war in Syria that began in March 2011.
It is intended to provide financial, political and security support to the
country. Paris hosted in March the last meeting for the Support Group in the
presence of former President Michel Suleiman. Salam expressed regret that the
Lebanese president will not give a speech during the General Assembly meeting
due to the ongoing presidential deadlock. He considered that the deep rift
between Lebanese parties prevented the election a new head of state. Prime
Minister Tammam Salam will head the Lebanese delegation to New York if the
political arch-foes failed to elect a new president by the time of the meeting.
The premier will head a small delegation that will include Foreign Minister
Jebran Bassil and a limited number of advisers. The delegation, according to the
Lebanese diplomat, will hold high-level meetings with various heads of state and
officials. The 69th session of the U.N. General Assembly will kick off on
September 16 and the general debate will open on September 24. Lebanon plunged
in a vacuum on May 25 when Suleiman's six-year term ended with MPs unable to
find a successor over differences on a compromise candidate.
Army in Tripoli Raids as Local Group Denies Pledging Allegiance to IS
Naharnet /The army on Friday carried out raids in Tripoli and arrested a Syrian
man accused of belonging to a terrorist organization, as a prominent militant
group in the northern city denied pledging allegiance to the Islamic State or
al-Nusra Front.“The army is carrying out raids in Tripoli following reports of
alleged movements by Nusra-linked armed groups,” Voice of Lebanon radio (93.3)
reported in the evening. It said troops arrested Syrian national Adham Hajj
Hamidi in Tripoli's Abi Samra on charges of belonging to a “terrorist group.”
Meanwhile a local militant group led by young Tripoli resident Osama Mansour
denied reports that it had pledged allegiance to IS or Nusra. Mansour, 27, had
been wanted on dozens of arrest warrants and he was recently apprehended in the
Bekaa before being eventually released, LBCI television said.
“We're closer to al-Nusra Front's policy, ideology … and behavior on the ground.
We admire al-Nusra Front and we're closer to it, but we have not pledged
allegiance to the IS or the Front,” Mansour, who some locals refer to as “the
emir”, said in an interview on LBCI.
Citing security reports, the TV network said Mansour's 20-member group has
recently “occupied” the Omar bin Massoud Mosque in Bab al-Tabbaneh and that the
militant started “playing a bigger role” in the city with the beginning of the
Arsal battle in the Bekaa in early August. Mansour and his group have however
denied “occupying” the mosque, noting that they are present there because they
are residents of the neighborhood, LBCI added.
Shadi al-Mawlawi, a fugitive Islamist militant and a member of Mansour's group,
also appeared in LBCI's report.
The TV network said the interview was filmed in Bab al-Tabbaneh's al-Ahram area.
“We contributed to the recent release of the five Sunni troops” who had been
kidnapped by Nusra during Arsal's battle, Mawlawi told LBCI. “As for the Rafida
(Shiite) troops, they have showed hostility and fought our people in (Syria's)
Qusayr and Yabrud and (Sidon's) Abra. We wish they would be killed,” Mawlawi
added. “We honestly wish for their death but we prefer a (prisoner) exchange …
because we have people in Roumieh's prison,” Mawlawi went on to say.
The Islamic State group controls thousands of square kilometers of territory in
Iraq and Syria. It has also engaged alongside Nusra in deadly clashes with the
Lebanese army in Arsal before pulling back to the Syrian side of the border. IS
militants have beheaded two Lebanese soldiers who were taken captive along with
several others from the army and security forces. The militants are reportedly
seeking the release of Islamist prisoners from Lebanon's Roumieh prison in
return for the rest of the troops they have in their custody.
Man Held after Threatening 3 Children with 'Slaughter' in Video
Naharnet/A 30-year-old man was arrested Friday after he appeared in a video in
which he terrorizes three young boys and threatens to slaughter them with a
knife. “The Intelligence Bureau of the Internal Security Forces has managed to
arrest 30-year-old Lebanese suspect M. F. in the Nabatiyeh town of Ebba, after
he threatened three toddlers with slaughter in a video circulated on social
networking websites,” LBCI television reported.
“Who shall we slaughter first?” the man asks in the video, in which only his
knife-wielding hand appears.
“Put your hand here or else I will sever your head,” he tells one of the
terrified boys, who cry their lungs out throughout the video.
“You, come here … Do you belong to Daesh?” the man says, using an acronym for
the full Arabic name of the extremist Islamic State group, which has recently
beheaded two Lebanese soldiers.
The kidnap and murder of Lebanese troops and policemen by IS and al-Nusra Front
jihadists have sparked new tensions in Lebanon, including a backlash against
Syrian refugees and a string of sectarian kidnappings. The captive soldiers and
policemen were kidnapped during fierce clashes in the Bekaa border town of Arsal
last month.
The hostage crisis and beheadings have inflamed tensions in Lebanon, which is
hosting more than 1.1 million Syrian refugees, and where tensions were already
soaring over the four-year conflict in Syria. In recent days, tents belonging to
Syrian refugees have been set alight and hundreds of Syrians sheltered in the
Bekaa valley have fled for fear of attack. Several beatings of Syrian citizens
were also reported in Beirut's southern suburbs.
In July, a video of a Lebanese child beating up a Syrian minor sparked uproar in
the country. The video showed the Lebanese child holding a stick and beating up
the minor at the instructions of one of his relatives.
Prominent Delegation Travels to Doha ahead of PM Visit as Hujeiri Ends
Negotiations with Gunmen
Naharnet /Sheikh Mustafa al-Hujeiri a.k.a. Abu Taqiyeh, who has been mediating
with Islamist gunmen the release of abducted Lebanese security personnel,
withdrew from negotiations as a high-ranking security delegation is expected to
head to Qatar on Friday.
“I have withdrawn from the negotiations,” Sheikh Hujeiri told An Nahar
newspaper. The Sheikh pointed out that he decided to end his intervention in the
case after his convoy came under fire as he was escorting back the family of
soldier George Khoury following their meeting. “I am under the threat of
assassination by a known group,” Hujeiri revealed. On Monday night, Hujeiri
escorted the mother, brother and sister of Khoury to the outskirts of Arsal to
visit him, but they came under fire at Arsal's edge on their way back home.
“No one contacted me to check if I am well, including the family of Khoury,”
Hujeiri said.
Khoury is one of a number of soldiers and policemen who were abducted by
Islamist militants from the northeastern border town of Arsal in August in light
of clashes in the area between the army and the gunmen from Syria.
A few of them have since been released, while two others were beheaded,
prompting a backlash against Syrian refugees in Lebanon.
Ministerial sources told al-Liwaa newspaper that a progress in the negotiation
between a Qatari delegation and the Islamist gunmen prompted Prime Minister
Tammam Salam to decide to travel to Doha. The premier will head a delegation to
Qatar on Sunday.
According to the sources, a breakthrough is expected to be achieved by Salam's
visit. Qatar has reportedly dispatched a delegation to negotiate with Islamist
gunmen from ISIL and the al-Qaida-affiliate al-Nusra Front the release of the
soldiers and policemen.
The delegation, according to reports, tasked a Syrian national to meet with the
extremists to relay their demands to the Lebanese state, which rejects direct
talks with the jihadists.
Al-Joumhouria newspaper said that a high-ranking security and administrative
delegation was tasked with carrying out the necessary preparations for Salam's
visit. The delegation reportedly includes Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashouq,
Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, Labor Minister Sejaan Qazzi, Minister of Social
Affairs Rashid Derbas, Public Works and Transportation Minister Ghazi Zoaiter,
Health Minister Wael Abu Faour and Justice Minster Ashraf Rifi. General Security
chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim, the Secretary-General of the Higher Relief
Council Maj. Gen. Mohammad Kheir and an administrative and diplomatic delegation
will accompany Salam in his one-day visit where extensive meetings will be held.
Lebanese Forces MP Zahara, blasts Rai over presidential
vacuum remarks
The Daily Star
BEIRUT: A Lebanese Forces MP Friday launched a scathing attack against Maronite
Patriarch Beshara Rai for comments he made about the presidential stalemate,
saying the March 8 group was to blame for the continued vacuum. “How could you,
Patriarch Rai, generalize, and say that all of us are responsible for the
paralysis? How could you allow yourself, given what you represent, not
differentiate between those disrupting the Constitution and others who are
committed to it?” MP Antoine Zahra said in a statement. “The March 14 coalition
has a candidate who has a clear agenda and is committed to applying the
Constitution. He has also said that he would abandon his nomination to discuss
the possibility of a consensus candidate.” “How then could you equate us with
the other group whose candidate is still unknown? They're the ones boycotting
parliamentary sessions and refusing any consensus or agreement.”The Maronite
patriarch said late Thursday in Washington that the political class as a whole
was to blame for the inability of Parliament to elect a new president, saying
that the March 8 and the March 14 coalitions could no longer continue "on two
separate paths." Zahra said Rai should refrain from making such remarks if he
had no intention of supporting or opposing one group over the other.
“As for him saying that March 8 and March 14 should not continue on different
paths, I will allow myself to ask you this: What do you want us to do? To carry
arms and join the Resistance Brigades? You want us to fight in Syria? You want
us to boycott parliamentary sessions to elect a president?”"You want us to
attack you and call you a traitor for vising the Holy Land? You want us to
disrupt the work of institutions, block roads and kidnap people?” The lawmaker
defended the March 14 coalition, saying the group, particularly LF Leader Samir
Geagea, had proposed several solutions to end the presidential crisis. “The
issue is not personal ... it is a matter of political choices,” Zahra said.
“Your remarks confuse people and contradict the truth. Lebanon is facing two
political agendas, and you implicitly support one of these agendas.” “If you
could convince March 8 to abandon their agenda, then we would welcome such a
move. Until then, we hope you can convince them to attend parliamentary
sessions.”Some March 8 MPs have boycotted 10 parliamentary sessions to elect a
new president, arguing that the meetings were futile unless rival parties agreed
on a consensus candidate.
Meet the man leading America’s anti-ISIS push, Retired
Marine Gen. John Allen
The Associated Press, Washington
Friday, 12 September 2014
Retired Marine Gen. John Allen will coordinate the broad international effort to
battle the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria militants, as the campaign against
the extremist group ramps up and nations begin to determine what role each will
play, U.S. officials said Thursday. Allen, who has been serving as a security
adviser to Secretary of State John Kerry, is expected to work with the nearly 40
nations around the world who have agreed to join the fight and help them
coordinate what each will contribute, several officials told The Associated
Press. The officials spoke about Allen's expected appointment on condition of
anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter ahead of an
announcement. Allen comes to the job with vast experience coordinating
international allies on the warfront. He served as deputy commander in Iraq's
Anbar province from 2006 to 2008, working with Arab partners on organizing the
Sunni uprising against al-Qaeda. He moved from there to serve for two years as
the deputy commander of U.S. Central Command, which oversees military troops and
operations in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia. Allen next became
the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan from 2011 to 2013, where he worked with
international allies who sent troops to the battlefield.
As a result of his experience, Allen is very familiar many of the Middle East
nations and leaders considered crucial to the latest effort to degrade and
destroy the Islamic State group militants who have seized control of portions of
Iraq and Syria in a ruthless reign of terror. He also has worked closely with
most of the key military and diplomatic leaders, including Gen. Lloyd Austin,
the current head of U.S. Central Command, who will oversee America's military
campaign.
President Barack Obama announced Wednesday night that the U.S. will be expanding
airstrikes in Iraq and into Syria, in an aggressive move to root out the Islamic
State group extremists where ever they are. Obama, Kerry and Defense Secretary
Chuck Hagel have spent the last week meeting with international leaders overseas
in an effort to build a broad coalition of nations - particularly Arab countries
in the region - to aid the fight.
Officials are looking for partners to help train moderate Syrian rebels, work
with the Iraqi security forces, contribute equipment, ammunition, intelligence,
logistics and funding, as well as possibly also launch airstrikes.
Iran, the U.S. helped ISIS become a monster
Friday, 12 September 2014
Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya
Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif recently accused the United States
of not taking seriously the threat from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
“There is still no serious understanding about the threat and they [the United
States] have as yet taken no serious action,” Zarif said, Iran’s Mehr news
agency reported. In addition, Washington has not invited Tehran to join the core
coalition - comprising Australia, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany,
Italy, Poland, Turkey and the United States - aimed at defeating ISIS.
Washington and Tehran share a common objective in Iraq: defeating the group and
empowering the central government in Baghdad. “Tehran’s involvement, and that of
its proxy Hezbollah, in the Syrian conflict ratcheted up sectarianism”Instead of
pointing fingers and having Iran attempt to hide its underlying strategic and
geopolitical intentions, it would be more effective if both governments examine
their recent regional activities. They should observe how they are the major
contributors in growing ISIS into a monster, and how its rise still serves
Tehran’s regional interests.
Iran and ISIS
Iran’s support for President Bashar al-Assad has been instrumental in keeping
the Alawites in power in Syria. However, this assistance also caused the
uprising to spiral into a full-fledged sectarian civil war. In other words, the
Iranian and Syrian governments’ use of brute force further radicalized and
militarized the conflict. Tehran’s involvement, and that of its proxy Hezbollah,
in the Syrian conflict ratcheted up sectarianism as well, pitting Sunnis,
Shiites and Alawites against each other. This enabled al-Qaeda affiliates and
groups such as ISIS to develop, organize, recruit and coordinate more
efficiently. From the start, Iran’s line has been that Assad was attacked by
terrorists and radical Sunni Islamist groups. Damascus employed the same
argument to legitimize its use of force and prevent foreign intervention.
The Syrian government, with help from Iranian advisors, released several ISIS
members and Salafists from prison in late 2011 and early 2012, in order to
strengthen the argument that Assad was a target of radicals and terrorists
rather than a popular uprising. ISIS recruitment significantly intensified
during this time. From the start, the rise of such radical groups served the
interests of Tehran and Damascus. Both succeeded in sending the West,
particularly the United States, a robust message that there is no alternative to
Assad, and that any foreign military intervention would exacerbate the conflict.
The elite Quds Forces, a branch of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, has gained
significant power in Iraq and Syria since the rise of ISIS. Tehran no longer
sees a need to hide the involvement of its troops in these countries. The
growing role of the IRGC and Quds Forces is being justified by Iran’s claim that
it is fighting ISIS. Washington sees no other option than to turn a blind eye to
the increasing role of Iranian troops.
Exploiting the rise of ISIS
Tehran and the IRGC have been carrying out effective foreign policies to serve
their own interests since the rise of ISIS. Firstly, Iran has managed to project
itself as pivotal in defeating ISIS. Secondly, the security threat posed by the
group has shifted attention from Tehran’s nuclear program. The strategic
catastrophe of invading Iraq in 2003 gave birth to al-Qaeda affiliates and other
radical groups such as ISIS. The post-invasion instability and involvement of
U.S. troops in Iraq provided a suitable environment and excuse for such groups
to grow and recruit to fight what they call American imperialism and occupation.
Iran’s support for the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government gave ISIS the tools to
exploit the growing disaffection of Iraqi Sunnis, who were left out of the
political process. Without Iranian support for its close ally Syria, as well as
U.S. involvement in Iraq, it is hard to imagine that ISIS would have found the
right landscape in Syria (and later Iraq) to become a monster and a powerful
non-state actor.
Unsavory Bedfellows المرافقون البغيضون
Following an “alleged offense,” which Lee Smith understood as a
natural practice of free expression, Chaghoury intervened, leading to Lee’s
detention for an hour by DC Metropolitan police.
Read below.
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2014/09/12/unsavory-bedfellowsfollowing-an-alleged-offense-which-lee-smith-understood-as-a-natural-practice-of-free-expression-chaghoury-intervened-leading-to-lees-detention-for-an/
http://m.weeklystandard.com/articles/unsavory-bedfellows_804846.html?page=1
It’s not easy protecting the Christians of the Middle East.
The Weekly Standard
Sep 22, 2014, Vol. 20, No. 02
BY LEE SMITH
Last week, Senator Ted Cruz helped unmask an organization ostensibly founded to
protect a Middle East minority. When the Texas legislator, the keynote speaker,
asked the gala dinner audience comprising mostly Middle Eastern Christians at
the In Defense of Christians conference in Washington to stand with Israel, many
hooted and booed him off the stage. The hostility came as no surprise to me:
When I found myself the night before in the same bar as a group of IDC speakers
and organizers—at the Four Seasons in Georgetown—I ordered a bottle of champagne
and had it sent to their table. Not long after, the D.C. Metropolitan Police
detained me and a friend for an hour.
IDC’s proclaimed purpose—to protect Christians in the face of a jihadist
onslaught led at present by ISIS—is of utmost importance. However, too many of
the priests, prelates, and patriarchs from Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq, as well as
one of the organization’s key benefactors, Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire Gilbert
Chagoury, have also identified themselves as supporters of the Iranian axis in
the Middle East. ISIS is a murderous group, but so is the regime in Tehran and
so are its clients, chief among them Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Hezbollah in
Lebanon.
ISIS, as the world now knows all too well, has used beheadings, crucifixions,
and all forms of murder and torture to terrorize its opponents, who include
Christians, Yazidis, Alawites, Shiite Muslims, and Sunnis who don’t pledge
fealty. But Assad’s record in Syria is no better. Besides the gas attacks and
indiscriminate bombings that have killed tens of thousands of innocents, his
security forces have specialized in acts of vindictive sadism. Early in the
uprising, for instance, they mutilated the corpse of a 13-year-old boy before
returning the body to his parents.
And yet many of the clerics invited to speak at the IDC conference are openly
supportive of Assad. For instance, Maronite patriarch Bechara Boutros al-Rai
calls Assad a reformer. Maybe he took that message to the White House when he
met with Obama and Susan Rice Thursday afternoon to ask for continued American
support for the Lebanese Armed Forces, even if its military intelligence unit is
controlled by Hezbollah. But whatever is wrong with Hezbollah or Assad, many of
the IDC clerics reason, at least they’re killing the Sunni extremists who would
kill them.
I referenced this conception of Assad’s role in the note I sent along with the
champagne: “Thanks IDC—and thanks Bashar al-Assad, ‘Protector of Christians’!
XOXOXO.” I asked the waitress to deliver the bottle directly to Chagoury, who
according to leaked U.S. diplomatic cables has supported Michel Aoun,
Hezbollah’s key Christian ally in Lebanon. A 2007 cable also explains that
Chagoury is close to Suleiman Franjieh Jr., another pillar of Lebanon’s
pro-Damascus, pro-Hezbollah March 8 political coalition and a man who calls
Assad his friend and brother. Former prime minister of Lebanon Fouad Siniora
suggested to then U.S. ambassador to Lebanon Jeffrey Feltman “that the U.S.
deliver to Chagoury a stern message about the possibility of financial sanctions
and travel bans against those who undermine Lebanon’s legitimate institutions.”
My friend noticed that the bottle was returned to the bar unopened. So there
would be no thanks, sarcastic or otherwise, or insults. We left, disappointed,
and got into a taxi. A policeman stopped the cab and told us to get out. His
partner pulled out the note and asked if I’d written it. Of course, I said. The
recipient, she explained, perceived it as a threat.
This was now getting interesting. A man who was a confidant of Sani Abacha, head
of one of the bloodiest and most corrupt regimes in modern African history, and
friends with Lebanese warlords like Nabih Berri thought that a note accompanying
a bottle of champagne was threatening.
They can’t take a joke at their expense because usually they don’t have to, my
friend said. With them it’s always the principle of “Do you know who I am?” This
is what happens when you mess with a powerful man, one of the richest men in the
world. However, my friend continued, this is not Nigeria or Lebanon—there are no
thugs and militias waiting in the wings. This is the United States of America.
The police asked us to wait while they talked with Chagoury and his party. He’s
a big Clinton donor. Who knows? Maybe he had lawyers calling in to the police.
After about half an hour, someone with the Chagoury gang walked out from the
hotel lobby and circled around to get a look at us. The guy looked just like
Samir Kassir, a Lebanese journalist I met once when I lived in Beirut. But then
I remembered it couldn’t be him: Kassir was on the other side. For opposing the
Assad/Hezbollah condominium over Lebanon supported by the likes of Chagoury,
Kassir was killed with a car bomb in 2005.
What happens under the hoods of Lebanese cars, what goes on in Nigerian prisons,
is the province of men like Chagoury and their political patrons. This is the
capital of the free world. After an hour, too long by any reckoning, the cops
sent us on our way, happy to be reminded on the eve of 9/11 that as Americans we
stand with our friends around the region of all faiths, Christian, Jewish, and
Muslim, who believe in what we believe in and fight for what we too often take
for granted—the right to express oneself freely, the obligation to mock those
who stand with murderers.
Lee Smith is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard.
Obama assembles non-coalition to fight
not-war against ISIS
By: John Hayward
9/12/2014 09:00 AM
President Barack Obama said Wednesday that the United States will not be
intimidated by Islamic State militants after the beheading of a second American
journalist and will build a coalition to "degrade and destroy" the group....
Can we agree that President Obama’s Wednesday night “war speech” against ISIS,
far from being the foreign-policy grand slam his sycophants rushed to portray it
as, was one of the greatest failures of his presidency? What an astonishing
embarrassment, not just for Obama but for the nation he’s led into ruin. The
weakness of American influence after six years of this man’s arrogance and
incompetence is plain for all to see. If the ISIS head-choppers have a sense of
humor that responds to anything other than decapitation, they must be rolling on
the floor with laughter.
First we had the United Kingdom and Turkey bail on Obama within hours of his
speech. Then it was Germany’s turn to say no dice, expressly because they
haven’t heard anything that sounds like a real strategy yet from Obama.
International Business Times has the faceplant round-up:
Germany’s Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier questioned whether Obama’s
plan of airstrikes and equipping moderate Syrian rebels was adequate. “We
haven’t been asked, nor will we do it,” he said of the airstrikes. “We need to
be honest with ourselves in the current situation, we don’t yet have a final,
blanket strategy which guarantees that we’ll be successful against ISIS and
similar groups.“
Turkey, a crucial U.S. ally in the Middle East that borders Syria, said it won’t
allow the U.S.-led coalition to launch strikes in Syria from its air bases. It
also won’t participate in any combat operations. “Turkey will not be involved in
any armed operation but will entirely concentrate on humanitarian operations,”
an unnamed Turkish government official told Agence France-Press.
There was initial confusion after British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond
saidearlier on Thursday the U.K. “will not be taking part of any airstrikes in
Syria,” according to AFP. A spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron
said Hammond meant to say that the U.K. would not be bombing Syrian President
Bashar Assad, the Guardian reported. Obama’s plan does not include any strikes
against the Syrian leader.
I don’t think there was any “initial confusion” in London. No one ever thought
the American plan would involve bombing Bashar Assad. They said no, then watched
in horror as the rest of the world’s leaders gave Obama the backs of their
hands, and realized they had to soften their stance to preserve a smidgen of
American credibility. The Brits were unwilling to stand by and watch Obama lead
the civilized world to defeat inside of 48 hours.
Guess where the most robust support for Obama is coming from? That’s right: the
folks Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) is currently taking heat for describing as a
strong ally of Christians and other persecuted minorities in the Middle East.
“All civilized countries should stand together in the fight against radical
terrorism that sweeps across the Middle East, that sweeps across the world,”
declared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, endorsing action against
ISIS in a speech to the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism that dealt
primarily with the threat of nuclear Iran. “And we are playing our part in this
continued effort. Some of the things are known, some things are less known.”
If Obama can’t put a coalition together against a pack of slave-taking,
woman-raping, prisoner-torturing lunatics with about 30,000 men under arms
(which is about twice what the intelligence community previously estimated –
whoops!) then he’s not going to be leading any global efforts to take out the
Iranian nuclear weapons programs. By the way, the same intelligence community
that can’t get anything about ISIS right, and which Obama blames for all of his
foreign policy failures, is the team he confidently assured us would know the
microsecond Iran was close to deploying atomic weapons, during the same
presidential campaign where he assured America that Iraq was secure and the
Russians were our harmless comrades now.
Not only did Turkey tell Obama to pound sand, but as the New York Times notes,
other Arab governments that “grumbled quietly in 2011 as the United States left
Iraq, fearful it might fall deeper into chaos or Iranian influence” are giving
Obama “tepid support” for his non-strategy to wage non-war with a non-coalition
against the non-Islamic Islamic State, with the most enthusiastic support for an
American bombing campaign coming from – gulp – the Assad regime in Syria:
While Arab nations allied with the United States vowed on Thursday to “do their
share” to fight ISIS and issued a joint communiqué supporting a broad strategy,
the underlying tone was one of reluctance. The government perhaps most eager to
join a coalition against ISIS was that of Syria, which Mr. Obama had already
ruled out as a partner for what he described as terrorizing its citizens.
Syria’s deputy foreign minister, Fayssal Mekdad, told NBC News that Syria and
the United States were “fighting the same enemy,” terrorism, and that his
government had “no reservations” about airstrikes as long as the United States
coordinated with it. He added, “We are ready to talk.”
Others were less than forthcoming. The foreign minister of Egypt — already at
odds with Mr. Obama over the American decision to withhold some aid after the
Egyptian military’s ouster last year of the elected president — complained that
Egypt’s hands were full with its own fight against “terrorism,” referring to the
Islamist opposition.
In Jordan, the state news agency reported that in a meeting about the extremists
on Wednesday, King Abdullah II had told Secretary of State John Kerry “that the
Palestinian cause remains the core of the conflict in the region” and that
Jordan was focusing on the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.
Jordan could very well be the Islamic State’s next target, and not even they
will give two cheers to Operation Degrade and Ultimately Destroy But War HUH
What Is It Good For Absolutely Nothing Say It Again? Wow. Also notably short of
excitement for Obama’s war plans: Iraq, the country ISIS actually invaded.
Even in Baghdad and across Syria, where the threat from ISIS is immediate,
reactions were mixed. Members of Iraq’s Shiite majority cheered the prospect of
American help. But many Sunni Muslims were cynical about battling an
organization that evolved from jihadist groups fighting American occupation.
“This is all a play,” said Abu Amer, 38, a government employee, who withheld his
family name for his safety. “It is applying American political plans.”
Mr. Amer is a more perceptive critic of Obama’s theatrics than much of the
American mainstream media. CNN should dump hapless former Obama spokesman Jay
Carney – last seen getting destroyed during his big debut by Senator John McCain
– and hire Abu Amer as a commentator.
It’s not that ISIS has any shortage of enemies in the region, including vigorous
competition from marginally less evil terrorist groups. It’s that nobody wants
to waste their prestige and political capital signing on to a vague Obama plan
that everyone knows was hastily cooked up over the brief span of days since the
President blurted out that he doesn’t have a strategy, and he spent over half of
that “planning” time golfing and holding fundraisers. Obama’s only priority is
salvaging his poll numbers, and there’s not much appetite among international
leaders to help him do it.
What’s amazing about all this is how absolutely amateurish it is. You don’t give
a big speech announcing a broad international coalition unless you actually have
the coalition lined up. It’s increasingly clear Obama and his buffoonish
Secretary of State, John Kerry, didn’t actually talk to anyone outside the
Administration before throwing the Wednesday night speech together. They just
assumed everyone would give them immediate public support, and maybe get in
touch behind the scenes to invoice them for whatever pot-sweeteners it would
take to secure minimal practical cooperation, such as using Turkey’s air bases.
It would be tacitly understood that America did all the heavy lifting on the
actual air campaign, which Obama sees as a politically cost-free way to drag the
ISIS story out until the news cycle rolls along to something else. Why wouldn’t
all those interesting foreign leaders Obama loves to dine with step forward and
give him just wee little bit of rhetorical support in his hour of crisis?
No doubt one of the reasons for this tepid global response is that it’s got all
the makings of a classic Obama cut-and-run disaster. The Administration is still
spending a ridiculous amount of time arguing over the very semantics of what
they’re doing. When you can’t even bring yourself to use the word “war,” don’t
be surprised when no one is eager to rally to your banner. From The Hill:
The United States is not at war with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS
or ISIL), Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday.
Kerry said the administration’s plan to combat ISIS includes “many different
things that one doesn’t think of normally in context of war” during an interview
with CNN.
“What we are doing is engaging in a very significant counterterrorism
operation,” Kerry said. “It’s going to go on for some period of time. If
somebody wants to think about it as being a war with ISIL, they can do so, but
the fact is it’s a major counterterrorism operation that will have many
different moving parts.”
In a separate interview with CBS News, Kerry also rejected the word “war” to
describe the U.S. effort and encouraged the public not to “get into war fever”
over the conflict.
“We’re engaged in a major counterterrorism operation, and it’s going to be a
long-term counterterrorism operation. I think war is the wrong terminology and
analogy but the fact is that we are engaged in a very significant global effort
to curb terrorist activity,” Kerry told the network.
“I don’t think people need to get into war fever on this. I think they have to
view it as a heightened level of counterterrorist activity … but it’s not
dissimilar similar to what we’ve been doing the last few years with al Qaeda in
Afghanistan and Pakistan and in Yemen and elsewhere,” he added.
This dolt is giving interviews where he describes the citizens of his own
country as bloodthirsty knuckleheads quivering with war fever. Meanwhile, State
Department spokes-teenager Marie Harf explained why this is, like, totally not a
war, no matter how many bombs we drop, and don’t you dare harsh the
Administration’s mellow by bringing up that Bush doctrine of pre-emption, dudes:
“When we talk about how you degrade and defeat terrorist organizations, it’s not
exactly I think how you’re probably using the term. And it’s not one that I’m
using. Our goal is to prevent terrorist organizations from being able to attack
the United States or our interests, to degrade their capabilities to do so.
Obviously those are the kinds of terms I would use when it comes to this current
effort.”
She also whined “Why do you always focus on what people say they won’t do?” when
asked about Germany backing out of the Coalition to Save Obama’s Poll Numbers.
And when Jay Carney’s successor as White House spokesman, Josh Earnest, was
asked what “destroying” ISIS means or what “victory” would look like, he sneered
that he doesn’t know the meaning of such words: “I didn’t bring my Webster’s
dictionary.”
Normally when you’re trying to rally your allies to a serious effort, you say
that you don’t know the meaning of the word defeat, not the meaning of victory.
Can you blame world leaders for being reluctant to climb aboard such an obvious
train wreck? Is it any surprise they find no inspirational leadership in a
bumbling White House that’s obviously spending 99 percent of its efforts on
political spin and rhetorical positioning? The task at hand is defeating a
savage enemy that’s been given enough time to establish itself and train with an
impressive arsenal of captured weapons – an enemy that has already routed one of
the main American proxies, the Iraqi military. Opening up the second front
involves finding the very precise combination of Syrian rebels that are willing
to fight ISIS, inclined to serve as reliable and respectable American allies,
and won’t hand victory in the Syrian civil war to Bashar Assad by turning their
guns against the rest of his enemies.. Absolutely nothing about the history or
current behavior of the Obama Administration should give anyone confidence that
they’re up to the task, especially since they stubbornly refuse to define the
parameters of the mission or establish victory conditions.
Maybe I can be of service by offering a suggestion for the branding effort, so
this combination of wheezy political hacks and clueless mall rats can turn their
attention to devising an actual strategy. I suggest adding some seasonal flair
by calling the battle against ISIS a “pumpkin spice containment and
degradation.” Or maybe they could brand the operation as “I Can’t Believe It’s
Not War!” – great taste with a lighter emotional burden, available from fine
grocery stores everywhere in 3-year
There Goes The Neighbourhood
BY ANDREW TABLER SEPTEMBER 11, 2014
Foreign Policy.
GOLAN HEIGHTS — While the world focuses on the Islamic State's advances in Iraq and Syria, the Syrian war is spilling over into the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights. On Aug. 28, Syrian rebel groups, led by al Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front, captured the old border city of Quneitra from the Syrian army and Iranian-backed National Defense Forces. Al-Nusra Front took 45 Fijian U.N. peacekeepers hostage and then assaulted two other U.N. outposts -- only to be repulsed after the Filipino commander ignored U.N. orders to surrender. The hostage situation was only resolved Thursday, Sept. 11, as all the peacekeepers were released safely after what appears to be Qatari mediation.
But though the latest crisis on the Golan frontier may be over, the larger threats facing Israel still remain. Across the border, more and more black jihadi flags are popping up, mere feet from Israel's Star of David. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's forces and the Hezbollah-inspired resistance groups that continue to operate under the regime's umbrella have also launched attacks against Israeli-controlled areas in the Golan. This chaotic situation is creating considerable unease in Jerusalem policy circles -- and upending decades of Israeli strategy for dealing with Syria.
Syrian rebels, including al-Nusra Front, have been on the Golan frontier for about a year. Their largest presence has been in the middle of the "zone of separation" between Israeli and Syrian forces -- which has been monitored by peacekeepers from the U.N. Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) since 1974 -- near the frontier villages of Bir Ajam, ar-Ruwayhinah, and Buraykah. Over the past two weeks, however, al-Nusra Front and five other Syrian opposition groups have launched an offensive in the area, pushing back the regime and upsetting the status quo along the border that has persisted for four decades.
Israeli officials say the latest offensive has introduced two new and potentially game-changing aspects into Syria's southern front.
Israeli officials say the latest offensive has introduced two new and potentially game-changing aspects into Syria's southern front. First, al-Nusra Front has dramatically expanded its operations from the southern Syrian city of Deraa into the areas adjacent to the Golan frontier. Theories about the jihadi group's motivations vary: Israeli sources say the Islamic State chased the group out of eastern Syria, causing it to shift its men and firepower south to use against the Assad regime.
The offensive makes it harder for the regime to use its weapons of choice -- including artillery, Scud missiles, and rockets -- against opposition positions without risk of hitting Israeli-controlled areas and drawing an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) response. On Aug. 27, for example, two regime mortars seemingly intended for rebel forces in Quneitra landed in the vineyards of the border kibbutz of Ein Zivan, drawing an Israeli counterstrike hours later against a Syrian government command facility. The rebels' overall goal seems to be relieving a number of regime-encircled rebel positions southwest of Damascus, including Beit Jinn, Khan al-Sheikh, and areas west of al-Kiswah.
The second game-changer is UNDOF's crumbling presence on the Golan. Hostage-taking is nothing new in the Syrian war, but al-Nusra Front's attempt to ransom the 45 Fijian U.N. peacekeepers ups the ante both with Israel and the international community. Before it backed down Thursday, the group issued three demands that show how detached the jihadists are from diplomatic and military realities: It wanted al-Nusra Front's removal from the U.N. terrorist list, humanitarian aid deliveries to besieged areas of Damascus, and compensation for three al-Nusra Front fighters recently killed during action against UNDOF forces.
Qatar, which recently negotiated the release of an American hostage held by al-Nusra Front and which is believed to have some contacts with the group, reportedly played a role in the negotiations to resolve the crisis. A U.N. Security Council statement called upon "countries with influence to strongly convey to those responsible to immediately release the peacekeepers," an indirect reference to Doha.
The hostage situation easily could have been much worse, as al-Nusra Front attempted to capture two UNDOF posts manned by Filipino peacekeepers on Aug. 30 and 31. Disobeying a direct order from their Indian UNDOF commander, the Filipino forces fired back when an al-Nusra Front truck attempted to ram the front of their outpost. In the hours that followed, intervention by a nearby Irish UNDOF battalion, as well as help from Israeli forces and Assad regime mortars, allowed the peacekeepers to escape to safety. While the Indian commander has since scolded his Filipino colleague for jeopardizing the lives of the Fijian and other UNDOF forces, the action is being referred to in Manila as the "greatest escape."
Officials in Jerusalem say al-Nusra Front's advance and UNDOF's increasingly "tattered umbrella" of security are causing a tactical shift in Israeli thinking. Israel never relied on UNDOF to protect Israel from cross-border action -- but its forces are a symbol of international legitimacy of the Golan frontier. The U.N. peacekeepers' reduction to three or four bases is a reflection of the increasing instability along the border.
Another factor behind the shift has been the creation of a responsibility vacuum on the Syrian-controlled side of the Golan. In other words, there is no longer one party that Israel or the United Nations can call to resolve disputes and deter from carrying out future attacks. Thus far, the party exploiting this vacuum has been the Assad regime and its allies. Following Assad's announcement this year that "resistance" along the Golan frontier would continue despite the war, a number of Hezbollah-inspired groups planted improvised explosive devices along the fence marking the Syrian side of the frontier that targeted Israeli patrols on the other side of the border. Israel has defused many of these devices but cannot find them all; so far, at least two have exploded. With these devices added to the regular dangers of cross-border shellfire from the war, Israelis are increasingly concerned about how to protect IDF soldiers and Golan residents from a war that seems set to escalate.
The biggest issue weighing on Israeli thinking on Syria is how to deter al-Nusra Front and jihadists in general. Israel's experience with moderate forces in southern Syria -- as demonstrated recently, when al-Nusra Front forced a captured Syrian rebel to divulge his Israeli contacts and meetings in a YouTube video -- indicate they are qualitatively weaker than the jihadists. While online sources provide a good amount of information on jihadi leaders and their aspirations, far less is known about their military calculations. The constellation of military and Iranian-trained paramilitary groups that make up the Assad regime seem more predictable -- they at least have the trappings of a state, however crippled, that Israel has dealt with indirectly for decades. Or as Israeli officials always lament: "At least there's an address."
But Israeli officials recognize that dealing with Syria going forward will require having many more addresses than simply Assad's palace. While some Israelis still prefer to deal with Assad's forces in the areas adjacent to the Golan, Tehran's deep involvement in propping up the regime means his outright victory would hand a strategic victory to Israel's archfoe.
For now, Israeli officials will continue to deal with challenges from two Syrias -- Assad's rump state in the west and the varied forces, including al-Nusra Front and the Islamic State, in the chaotic "Sunnistan" in the center -- while carefully looking for opportunities with Kurdish-controlled areas in the northeast that declared their autonomy earlier this year. As one Israeli official put it: "We have to watch each area village by village and keep our expectations low."
US House Hearing Focuses on Christian
Persecution in Iraq
2014-09-11
(AINA) -- A hearing on the plight of Christians in Iraq and Syria was convened
yesterday at the U.S. House of Representatives. The hearing, titled Genocidal
Attacks Against Christian and Other Religious Minorities in Syria and Iraq, was
sponsored by Chris Smith, U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 4th congressional
district, and was attended by other members of the House.
Congressman Smith began the hearing by saying "As images of beheaded American
journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff are seared into our consciousness, we
would do well to honor their memories by recalling that they saw it as their
mission to alert the world to the horrors committed by the fanatical Islamist
terrorist group ISIS in Syria and Iraq: Children forced to view crucifixions and
beheadings, women bartered, sold and raped, prisoners lined up on their knees to
be shot -- this is ISIS' legacy," Smith said. "Today Christians and other
religious minorities, such as Yezidis, Shabaks, and Turkmen Shiites are not just
facing a long winter without homes. They are not just hungry and thirsty and
wandering from village to village in Northern Iraq and Kurdistan. They are
facing annihilation--genocide--by fanatics who see anyone who does not subscribe
to its draconian and violent interpretation of Islam as fair game for
enslavement, forced conversion or death." (full statement).
Testifying at the hearing were:
•The Honorable Tom Malinowski, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Democracy, Human
Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State
•The Honorable Anne Richard, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population,
Refugees, and Migration, U.S. Department of State
•The Honorable Nancy Lindborg, Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Democracy,
Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance, U.S. Agency for International Development
•The Honorable Peter Galbraith, (Former Advisor to the Kurdistan Regional
Government)
•Her Excellency Pascale Esho Warda, President, Hammurabi Human Rights
Organization (Former Minister of Immigration and Refugees in the Iraqi
Government)
•Thomas Farr, Ph.D., Director, Religious Freedom Project, Berkley Center for
Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, Georgetown University
•Johnny Oram, President, Chaldean American Chamber of Commerce of California, in
lieu of Bishop Ibrahim N. Ibrahim, Bishop Emeritus, Chaldean Eparchy of St.
Thomas the Apostle
Pascale Warda.In her testimony Pascale Warda, a Chaldean Assyrian, outlined the
genocide directed against Assyrian Christians in Iraq and made the following
recommendations:
Short term:
•Provide humanitarian aid to the refugees. Aid is inadequate. There is a lack of
shelter, food, water, medicine and clothing.
•Clear ISIS from Mosul and the Nineveh Plain so that the displaced residents may
return to their homes ahead of winter. They will not return if ISIS is still in
Mosul.
•Designate the Nineveh Plain as a safe haven and provide an international force
for protection to stabilize the region, regardless of whether Iraqi or Kurdish
forces are there, so that residents may return to their homes. The Nineveh Plain
has been neglected by both Kurds and Baghdad. This long term safe haven would be
similar to the one provided for the Kurds in 1991.
•Financially compensate all displaced persons for their property and income
losses.
Long term:
•Establish an autonomous region for each the Assyrian Christians and the Yazidis,
to be administered by them.
•Create Assyrian Christian and Yazidi manned units within Iraqi police,
military, security and other institutions and station these in Assyrian and
Yazidi areas, so that they will defend themselves and their villages.
•Gain international recognition for the genocide against Assyrian Christians,
which has been ongoing since 1915.
Johnny Oram (name tag is misplaced).In his testimony, Johnny Oram, speaking on
behalf of Patriarch Louis Sako, said:
Senator Carl Levin visited Erbil on September 3 and had the opportunity to meet
with Assyrian/Chaldean and Yazidi religious leaders in which they provided a
summary which is consistent to the recent statement issued by Patriarch Sako of
what their immediate requests and needs are. They are primarily:
1.The international community must immediately intervene to provide direct
humanitarian aid to the displaced Christians and other minorities in the regions
of Erbil and Dohuk.
2.Christian and other minority villages in the Nineveh Plains must immediately
be liberated and the community must have safe passage to return.
3.The Christian and other minority villages in the Nineveh Plains must be
protected by an international force under the supervision of the United Nations.
Peter Galbraith.In his testimony, Peter Galbraith said:
In the past perpetrators of genocide and crimes against humanity have tried to
cover up their crimes. ISIS advertises its atrocities in slickly produced
videos," Galbraith said. "We know what is happening. The question is what will
the United States and its allies do about it." He urged that the West recognize
that ISIS is committing genocide against Iraq's Christians and the Yazidis, and
is killing, causing serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting intolerable
physical conditions "with the announced intent of destroying the Christian and
Yazidi religious groups in their entirety.
In his testimony, Thomas Farr said:
Tomorrow we mark the 13th anniversary of the Islamist terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001. What we are facing in Iraq and Syria today has deeply
troubling similarities to 9/11, both in its origins and its threat to American
national security. There is, of course, at least one major difference between
now and then. While Christians in the Middle East were under mounting pressure
in 2001, today their very existence is at risk. We are witnessing the
disappearance of Christians and Christianity from Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere in
the Middle East -- a religious/cultural genocide with terrible humanitarian,
moral, and strategic consequences for Christians, for the region, and for us
all.
In his testimony, Tom Malinowski said:
The U.S. government is very focused on ending ISIL's reign of terror and
ensuring protection and access to humanitarian assistance for all its victims.
We are particularly appalled by ISIL's targeted and systematic efforts to drive
out and potentially eradicate entire religious communities from their historic
homelands in the Ninewa plains area and Sinjar district. Among ISIL's clear
ambitions is the destruction of Iraq's rich religious heritage and ethnic
diversity and absolute subjugation of all people within its reach. The Iraqi
people need and deserve a government that not only represents all of their
voices but also provides basic government services and security.
In her testimony, Anne Richard said:
Now, most members of religious minority communities have fled Ninewa. In the
Kurdish region, they joined hundreds of thousands other displaced Iraqis,
including approximately 100,000 Christians, who escaped the brutal occupation of
Mosul and nearby communities. UNHCR estimates that the Kurdish regions of
northern Iraq now host more than one million people, a mix of displaced Iraqis
(850,000) and Syrian refugees (215,000).
In his testimony, Thomas Staal said:
The daily atrocities committed by ISIL against the Iraqi people -- including the
violence targeting ethnic minorities and religious groups -- is claiming and
destroying countless lives, tearing at the fabric of society, and further
enflaming sectarian violence. Furthermore, ISIL's abhorrent treatment of women
and children is unconscionable. These circumstances demand--and are
receiving--our focused attention and utmost effort.
© 2014, Assyrian International News Agency. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use.
A coalition of 40 countries to fight
ISIS
Friday, 12 September 2014
Abdulrahman al-Rashed ?Al Arabiya
It seems that the entire world has teamed up to wage war against one of the
smallest terrorist organizations: The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. But is
ISIS really worth a broad international coalition of 40 countries?
In my opinion, ISIS itself does not require but a few local forces on the
ground, working in tandem with the United States to hunt down the organization
and eradicate it. Such a force will succeed in destroying ISIS. But terrorism,
in general, requires the collaboration of a hundred countries to encircle it and
rid the world of it. This includes ISIS, the al-Nusra Front, Ahrar al-Sham, Boko
Haram in Mali, Ansar al-Sharia in Libya, al-Qaeda in Yemen and other extremist
organizations in the Sinai Peninsula, sub-Saharan Africa and even the Abu Sayyaf
group in the Philippines.
“The international community could benefit from the understanding and
cooperation of Arab and Islamic countries for the sake of fighting terrorist
organizations”
At this point, the world can claim that its cooperation has led to a distinct
job that will find support from Muslims everywhere. The crimes committed by ISIS
sparked Muslim anger towards terrorist organizations more so than we’ve ever
seen before. In the past, al-Qaeda succeeded in splitting Muslim opinion and
lured some support by raising the issue of confronting the Israeli occupation
and defending oppressed Muslims. ISIS has forced Muslim public opinion to gang
up against it. Muslims are stunned by the scale of the crimes it has committed
against civilians in both Syria and Iraq.
Understanding and cooperation
The international community could benefit from the understanding and cooperation
of Arab and Islamic countries for the sake of fighting terrorist organizations.
This support could help achieve optimal results in eradicating terrorism
everywhere, not just in Iraq and Syria.
Broadening the war against ISIS will set the standard for the next ten years
regarding how the international community deals with such groups. ISIS is not
the only target, however. There should be no place in our world for Libya’s
Ansar al-Sharia, Egypt’s al-Tahweed and al-Jihad, and others of their kind. They
should be besieged with laws that deny their funding and military aid should be
provided to fund their eradication. Previously, we called it al-Qaeda, but today
such organizations are operating under different labels. The truth is that ISIS
is nothing but al-Qaeda, the same goes for the al-Nusra Front and Ahrar al-Sham.
If the world is eager to fight terrorism, it is better to combat the
organization as a whole, not just the ISIS branch of it. Limiting the
international coalition to fighting ISIS alone will achieve a smaller target. It
will definitely succeed in ridding the world of one evil group, but the issue
will raise its head at a later date. For example, when terrorist organizations
in Mali or Nigeria dare to behead Western citizens, what will the world do to
them or the dozens of remaining terrorist groups?
Kerry says Iran excluded from
anti-ISIS fight
Agencies/ANKARA: Even as he discouraged Iran from joining talks on how to defeat
ISIS, the top U.S. diplomat could not outline Friday what other nations will
contribute to battling a group that has overtaken a third of Iraq and Syria and
threatens to upend the Mideast.
Secretary of State John Kerry, in Turkey to press its leaders on hardening its
borders against extremist traffic and funding, said it was not appropriate for
Iran to be at the discussions, given its support for the very government in
Syria whose brutality helped fuel the rise of ISIS. But after more than a week
of meetings with top NATO and Mideast officials, Kerry refused to say precisely
how an international campaign being pieced together by the U.S. would succeed in
destroying the extremist group that some believe is even more dangerous than
Al-Qaeda. France has said it wants Iran to participate. Kerry said “no one has
called me and asked me” whether France should invite Iran to the diplomatic
talks set for Monday in Paris on helping Iraq fight off ISIS.
“Under the circumstances, at this moment in time, it would not be right for
number of reasons,” Kerry said. “It would not be appropriate, given the many
other issues that are on the table with respect to their engagement in Syria and
elsewhere.”
He said Iranian forces have fought rebels in Syria, and accused Tehran of being
“a state sponsor of terror” in some areas of the world. Kerry also refused to
clarify how nations are willing to participate in President Barack Obama’s
strategy to obliterate ISIS’ vision of creating a caliphate that could encroach
on much of the Mideast. “There are other countries that are currently making up
their minds, making decisions,” Kerry told reporters after a meeting with
Turkish President Recep Erdogan and other top officials. “It’s just not
appropriate to start laying out as we are in the process of talking to all these
countries, which country is doing what.” He described himself as “very pleased”
with the talks so far.
“I am comfortable this will be a broad-based coalition with Arab nations,
European nations, the United States, others contributing to every single
different facet to what President Obama laid out as a strategy, and fully
embracing the need to degrade and destroy ISIL,” Kerry said, using an
alternative name for ISIS. The only detail that surfaced Friday was that retired
U.S. Marine Gen. John Allen, former commander of American forces in Afghanistan,
was appointed coordinator of the international effort against ISIS, the State
Department announced. “In this role General Allen will help continue to build,
coordinate and sustain a global coalition across the multiple lines of efforts
to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL,” said State Department deputy
spokeswoman Marie Harf. Allen’s deputy will be Brett McGurk, the deputy
assistant secretary of state for Iraq and Iran. Allen directed U.S. troops as
well as the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan from 2011 to
2013. He also served a key U.S. military role in the Iraq war. The CIA Thursday
put the number of fighters in ISIS ranks at 20,000 to 31,500 in Iraq and Syria,
up to three times the previous estimate.
Earlier, at the start of his meeting with Kerry, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut
Cavusoglu cited “challenges and threats” in Iraq and Syria. He did not mention
ISIS by name and did not respond to a shouted question about why Turkey refused,
a day earlier in Saudi Arabia, to join the U.S. and a coalition of Arab
countries against ISIS. Turkey has resisted publicly endorsing a new global
strategy to defeat ISIS, which kidnapped 49 Turkish citizens, including some
diplomats, in the Iraqi city of Mosul in June.
Senior U.S. officials who briefed reporters traveling with Kerry said Ankara
already has been working against ISIS, including by recently stopping about
6,000 people from entering Turkey and deporting 1,000 more who were deemed
suspicious. But one of the U.S. officials said Turkey’s borders remain extremely
porous. Because of its location, Turkey could be an ideal staging place for
allied fighter jets and drones that would launch airstrikes against ISIS
locations, but the U.S. officials said there currently are no plans to do so. In
Baghdad, French President Francois Hollande said during a visit his country was
ready to step up military assistance for Iraq. It was the highest-profile visit
to Iraq since the ISIS-led offensive in June and sparked international concern
over an expanding jihadist threat. France has said it is prepared to take part
in airstrikes against the militants in Iraq “if necessary.”“I came here to
Baghdad to state France’s availability in providing even more military
assistance to Iraq,” Hollande said at a news conference with Prime Minister
Haider al-Abadi, whose Cabinet was approved by parliament this week but with key
security posts unfilled. Hollande later traveled to Iraq’s autonomous Kurdish
region for meetings with officials, and also visited a church sheltering
displaced Iraqi Christians.
Thousands of Israeli-Arabs rally against Islamic State
Thousands of Israeli Arabs convened in Umm el-Fahm Friday for a
rally organized by the Islamic Movement in Israel's northern branch in
opposition to the radical Islamic State group. Israel Radio cited the leader of
the Islamic Movement's hardline northern branch, Sheikh Raed Salah, as stating
that his position was set against the extremist Islamist group that has
conquered parts of Syria and Iraq and aims to remap the Middle East. However,
Salah noted that he also opposed the coalition led by US President Barack Obama
pledging to take military action against Islamic State fighters, saying the
initiative threatened the Arab world. Also speaking at the march held under the
banner "Al-Aqsa is in Danger," a senior Israeli Arab official blamed the US and
Israel as the creators of Islamic State, also known as ISIS.
Mohamed Zidan, the head of the Higher Arab Monitoring Committee, pointed toward
Washington as funding the terrorist organization on which the US has declared
war. White House spokesperson Josh Earnest said on Friday the US was at war with
Islamic State terrorists in the same way it is with al-Qaida, but he stresses
this is very different from the last time the US went to war in Iraq. "In the
same way that we are at war with al-Qaida and its affiliates around the globe,
we are at war with ISIS. But make no mistake when I say we, I'm not talking just
about the United States. I'm talking about this broader international coalition
that includes Sunni-led governments in the region and our allies around the
world who are united in confronting this threat," Earnest said using an
alternate name for Islamic State. The statement came after US President Barack
Obama told Americans in a prime time addresses earlier in the week that he
planed to build an alliance to root out Islamic State in both Syria and Iraq,
plunging the United States into two conflicts in which nearly every country in
the Middle East has a stake. On Thursday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
declared Israel's support for the United States' plan for united action against
Islamic State