LCCC ENGLISH DAILY
NEWS BULLETIN
November 29/14
Bible Quotation For Today/Praise
for Spiritual Blessings in Christ
Ephesians01/01-15: "Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, to
God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus: Grace and
peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Praise be to the God
and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms
with every spiritual blessing in Christ. For he chose us in him before the
creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he
predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with
his pleasure and will— to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely
given us in the One he loves. In him we have redemption through his blood, the
forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace that he
lavished on us. With all wisdom and understanding, he made known to us the
mystery of his will according to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ,
to be put into effect when the times reach their fulfillment—to bring unity to
all things in heaven and on earth under Christ. In him we were also chosen,
having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in
conformity with the purpose of his will, in order that we, who were the
first to put our hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory. And
you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel
of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the
promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the
redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.
For this reason, ever since I heard about your faith in the Lord Jesus and
your love for all God’s people, I have not stopped giving thanks for you,
remembering you in my prayers. I keep asking that the God of our Lord
Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the Spirit of wisdom and
revelation, so that you may know him better. I pray that the eyes of your heart
may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called
you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in his holy people, and his
incomparably great power for us who believe. That power is the same as the
mighty strength he exerted when he raised Christ from the dead and seated him at
his right hand in the heavenly realms, far above all rule and authority,
power and dominion, and every name that is invoked, not only in the present age
but also in the one to come. And God placed all things under his feet and
appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his
body, the fullness of him who fills everything in every way.
Latest analysis,
editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 28-29/14
The Myth of 'Deradicalizing' Islamic Radicals/Tarek Fatah/November 28/14
Iran is a nation with two governments/Amir
Taheri /Asharq Al Awsat/November 28/14
Lieberman's 'peace plan': Pay Israeli Arabs to move to Palestinian
state/Barak Ravid/Haaretz/November 28/14
Lebanese Related News
published on November 28-29/14
Centenarian Lebanese poet, writer Said Akl dies
Lebanese Constitutional Council rejects Parliament extension challenge
Nusra reissues threat to kill captive tonight unless prisoner freed
Town mourns woman murdered by estranged husband
Nostalgic Salam opens first page of Lebanon book fair
Ski slopes still shut, but probably not for long
Former terror suspect recalls Roumieh hell
Lebanon's security requires both arms and dialogue: defense minister
Khalil determined to pass draft budget
Nusra to kill captive unless Lebanon frees female
Hezbollah advised government on hostage tactics
Hariri: Consensus president sole solution
Le Telegraphe, Bhamdoun’s best kept secret
Salam’s Brussels visit gains gravity
Armenian peacekeepers arrive in Lebanon
Police remove south Lebanon highway food stands
Disgraced Jumblatt aide jailed 2 years, fined $3.45M in corruption case
Aoun vows to stand his ground in presidency bid
Presidential elections needed now more than ever
Lebanese downbeat about country: poll
Intervention averts execution o Lebanese Captive soldier
March 8 praises Hariri’s support of dialogue
Will food scandal lead to animal welfare law?
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
November 28-29/14
Pope urges more Muslim opposition to ISIS in Turkey
Pope: I fear an escalation in the Holy Land
Officers killed, over 100 arrested in Egypt
France to recognize Palestine if talks fail
UNRWA declares state of emergency in Gaza
Thanksgiving feast for North American Olim
Turkey denies harboring Hamas terror command
Presidential elections needed now more than ever
GCC approves launch of “Gulf Interpol”
Nigeria mosque blasts: 92 dead at one hospital morgue: AFP reporter
Gulf between blocs delays electoral law
Destitute forced to collect wood for heating
Saudis block OPEC cuts, oil price falling
March into middle ages
Below Jihad Watch Posts For Thursday
Ireland: Muslim told Jihad Jane he was a “devoted jihadist”
UK jihadists funded by welfare benefits
UK Muslims arrested on suspicion of Syria-related jihad terror offenses
Egypt: Friday protest for “Islamic identity and Sharia”
UK: Muslima charged with encouraging terrorism on Twitter
Is Allah the same as the God of the Bible? — on The Glazov Gang
Pakistan: Muslims expel all Christians from village
Real Madrid drops cross from club crest to appease Abu Dhabi bank
Islamic State to Ferguson protesters: “We love you, and we will help you”
Syria: Jihadists murder man accused of insulting Muhammad
UK: Peer reported to Lords Speaker for noting Rigby killer was Qur’an-inspired
The Myth of 'Deradicalizing' Islamic
Radicals
by Tarek Fatah
The Toronto Sun
November 25, 2014
http://www.meforum.org/4898/the-myth-of-de-radicalization-of-islamic-radicals
Originally published under the title "The Myth of 'De-radicalization' of Islamic
Radicals."
On Monday, I appeared before the Senate Standing Committee on National Security
and Defence. The committee is studying the question of security threats to
Canada as well as 'deradicalization' efforts being promoted by the RCMP [Royal
Canadian Mounted Police].
I suggested to the senators that 'deradicalization' initiatives by Canada's
security agencies were doomed to failure because the very men and women
partnering with the RCMP in this exercise were not just part of the problem, but
in many ways the cause of radicalization.
For example, in mosques across Canada, our Friday congregation begins with a
prayer to Allah for a victory of Muslims over the kufaar (Christians, Jews and
Hindus). In such a climate, relying on Islamic religious clerics and Islamists
to fight radicalization is like employing the fox to guard the chicken coop.
Some senators looked at me with incredulity, taken aback by what I had said.
I suggested to the senators that some Islamic clerics are taking us for a ride.
For example, a Canadian cleric, a white convert to Islam who is touted as a 'deradicalization
counsellor' by the RCMP, was last week in the Gulf Emirate of Qatar, holding
meetings with the leadership of the Taliban.
On his Facebook page, this RCMP deradicalization counsellor wrote: "I am meeting
with the head of the Taliban Embassy in Doha, Qatar and we are working on a
treaty that would state clearly that the Taliban (mujahideen) don't condone
vigilante violence, criminal acts or terrorism in non-Muslim countries."
Deradicalization, I told the senators, was just an empty meaningless word. The
real challenge was to prevent radicalization and this required confronting the
rhetoric of political Islam rather than appeasing those who fanned religiosity
and made Muslims believe their first loyalty was to Islam, not their community
of fellow Canadians and Canada.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, most Muslim Canadians do not consider their
mosque imams to be their community leaders.
"To ask 'former radicals' to deradicalize radical Islamists is like asking
Marxists to convert Communists into liberal democrats," I told the committee.
It also seemed the senators were surprised to hear that, contrary to
conventional wisdom, most Muslim Canadians do not consider their mosque imams to
be their community leaders. In fact, most Muslims are not linked to any mosque
whatsoever.
One senator asked, if not the clerics, who were the real leaders of the
community?
She seemed surprised when I said "members of parliament" and those elected to
lead us.
The challenge, I said, is to prevent radicalization and the way to do so was to:
1. Lay hate speech charges against any Muslim cleric who hides behind religious
rights as he attacks and demonizes other religious faiths or people of no faith
at all.
2. Every mosque must be monitored for such hate speech where the word 'kuffar'
is invoked to hide the real target — Hindus, Christians and Jews.
3. Any mosque indulging in active politics must have its charitable status
revoked.
4. Donations of more than $20 at all religious institutions must be made by
cheque or credit card to cut off the possibility of money laundering.
5. Ally with anti-Islamist Muslims from among the victims of Islamist oppression
— the Kurds, Baloch, Darfuris and Iranian exiles.
6. Treat the PKK (Kurdish Workers Party) and the MeK (Iranian Resistance) as
allies, not adversaries.
And finally I recommended that immigration from Pakistan, Somalia, Iran, Iraq
and Syria must be suspended until Canada can be assured that security documents,
identity papers and university degrees cannot be bought on the black market or
from state agencies.
**Tarek Fatah is a founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress, a columnist at the
Toronto Sun, host of a Sunday afternoon talk show on Toronto's NewsTalk1010 AM
Radio, and a Robert J. and Abby B. Levine Fellow at the Middle East Forum. He is
the author of two award-winning books: Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of
an Islamic State and The Jew is Not My Enemy: Unveiling the Myths that Fuel
Muslim Anti-Semitism.
Centenarian Lebanese poet, writer Said Akl dies
The Daily Star/Nov. 28, 2014 /BEIRUT: Centenarian Lebanese poet, playwright and
language reformer Said Akl died Friday. “Lebanon and the Arabs lost today a
giant of poetry... May God’s mercy be on Said Akel,” tweeted former Prime
Minister Saad Hariri. Marada party leader and MP Sleiman Frangieh reacted to
Akl’s passing by tweeting “Lebanon’s Akl (Arabic for intellect) in God’s hands.”
Akl, considered one of the most important modern Lebanese poets, was born in
1911 to a Maronite Catholic family in the city of Zahle, Lebanon. A staunch
advocate of Lebanese identity and nationalism, Akl is famous for his design of a
Latin-based “Lebanese alphabet” made up of 37 letters. His writings include
poetry and prose both in Lebanese dialect and in classical Arabic language. He
also wrote theater pieces and authored many popular songs and pan-Arab anthems.
Lebanese
downbeat about country: poll
Ghinwa Obeid| The Daily Star/Nov. 29, 2014
BEIRUT, Lebanon: More than three-quarters of Lebanese think the economic
situation in Lebanon is extremely poor, according to a recent poll, and
perceptions were even worse when it came to the political situation. Some 77
percent of Lebanese believe the Lebanon’s economy is very bad, 22 said that it
was bad, while just 1 percent see the situation as good. Worryingly, 30 percent
of those surveyed said their family income was not covering their needs and that
they were having financial trouble. The results of the Arab Index study, which
was conducted from January to July of 2014 and included 26,618 respondents from
14 different Arab countries, were announced Friday in a news conference held by
the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies. The Arab Index is a poll that
documents and analyzes Arab public opinion on various issues including the
economy, politics and democracy. The 2014 poll was preceded by two similar
surveys in 2011 and 2012/13. Believed to be one of the biggest survey projects
in the Arab world, the poll interviewed 1,492 people in Lebanon alone. According
to the report, 60 percent of all those surveyed evaluated their countries’
economic situation as negative, compared to 38 percent who had a positive
outlook, such as residents of Algeria, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. That figure is
up compared to the 2012/2013 poll. “As much as there are things in common in the
Arab public opinion, the results have shown for the third time that there are
things particular to every country,” said Mohammad Masri, the coordinator of the
public opinion unit at the center.
“The Arab public opinion reflects similarities but at the same time, there are
distinctions in some major issues,” Masri added. This is evidenced by the fact
that Lebanon differs greatly from other countries on a number of issues.
Some 99 percent of respondents in Lebanon evaluated the political situation as
either bad or very bad. “The variance [between Lebanon and other countries]
isn’t in all questions; there are similar things,” Masri said. “Of course
there’s a special formation in Lebanon and there are different
conditions.”“There’s no doubt that the sectarian political form that’s present
in Lebanon prompts the Lebanese to have a different orientation,” Masri said.
One of the commonalities between Lebanon and many countries in the region,
however, was that the majority of participants in Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Libya,
Tunisia, Palestine and Sudan all deemed the political situation negative as
well. Still, despite the regional turmoil that has arisen as a result of a
series of national protests, civil wars, coups and changes in leadership known
as the “Arab Spring,” there was only a small overall decrease in those who
thought the political situation was positive. “The percentage of those saying
that the political situation is either good or very good has dropped from 39
percent in last year’s index survey to 36 percent for 2014,” read the report.
Those who saw the current status as either very bad or bad rose from 53 percent
last year to 59 percent this year.
Intervention averts execution o Lebanese Captive soldier
Hashem Osseiran| The Daily Star/Nov. 29, 2014
BEIRUT: The execution of a captive soldier being held on the Syrian border was
averted Friday after General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim negotiated
through mediators with Nusra Front jihadis to compel them to call off the
killing, a source at General Security told The Daily Star. And early Saturday,
the Lebanese government issues a statement saying authorities were doing
everything in their power to preserve the safety and the lives of the kidnapped
soldiers and policemen.
The source said that after Ibrahim intervened, the Nusra Front went back on its
threat issued Thursday to execute soldier Ali Bazzal within 24 hours if the
government failed to release a female terror suspect.
Ibrahim contacted mediators who attempted to persuade the captors to keep Bazzal
alive, the source said.
Bazzal’s wife, Rana Fliti, told The Daily Star in a phone interview that an
Arsal Sheikh Mustafa Hujeiri had traveled to the outskirts of the town around
6:15 p.m. to meet with the captors in an attempt to save his life. Fliti slammed
the government for not being responsive, saying that not a single member of the
crisis cell tasked with overseeing the hostage case was responding to her calls,
or updating her on the situation. She expressed hope that her husband would
return safely and said she had full confidence in Hujeiri. The Nusra Front
Friday reissued its threat to execute Bazzal. “Eight hours are left for the
release of Joumana Hmeid before carrying out the death [sentence] against the
captive Ali Bazzal,” a statement on a Nusra Twitter page read. The threat was
posted around 3:30 p.m., meaning the deadline was around 11:30 p.m. The
statement came after Nusra threatened Thursday to execute one of the 26 Lebanese
captives being held by jihadis on the northeast border unless Lebanon release
Hmeid within 24 hours.
The statement said that if the government wanted to prove that it was willing to
carry out serious negotiations then it should release Hmeid as a “goodwill
gesture.”Hmeid was formally charged by Military Prosecutor Saqr Saqr over
involvement with Al-Qaeda-linked groups, after she was caught driving a car
rigged with 50 kilograms of explosives on the Arsal-Labweh road last February.
Hmeid is the first woman to be accused of complicity with a terrorist
organization since the spate of car bombs and suicide attacks targeted areas
seen as sympathetic to Hezbollah over the past year and a half. Earlier Friday,
police used water canon to disperse families of hostages who had blocked a vital
Beirut highway. The protest came a day after the Nusra Front gave the government
24 hours to release Hmeid.
Families have been blocking roads across the country since the servicemen were
abducted in August during a battle with jihadis in the northeast border town of
Arsal, but the protest Friday morning was the first time police used force to
break one up.
Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk appeared to support the police move, vowing
not to let relatives of the 26 Lebanese hostages block any more roads. “We will
not be the hostages of the captives’ whims,” Machnouk told a news conference.
“Roads will not be blocked after today because this is not the solution for the
return of the servicemen,” he added. The families of the servicemen called for
Machnouk’s resignation. “If my resignation would free the hostages, I’m ready,”
the interior minister said, while stressing that Prime Minister Tammam Salam and
the government has spared no effort to resolve the hostage crisis. Referring to
the Islamist militants holding the hostages, Machnouk said that “these are
criminal groups that want to intimidate the families by sending them
instructions.”Health Minister Wael Abu Faour, however, urged security forces not
to use violence. Abu Faour, who has maintained cordial relations with the
families, acting as a liaison between them and a crisis cell tasked with
following up on the hostage crisis, slammed what he called an excessive use of
force. Around 8 a.m., the protesters faced off against dozens of policemen
before they were able to form a human chain to block Charles Helou Highway,
which leads from Karantina into Downtown Beirut, in both directions.
“The assault that the families of captives were subject to today is shameful to
the state,” Abu Faour said, insisting that the protesters were set to reopen
roads on their own before the scuffle. “It’s a demonstration of brute and failed
force [used] in the wrong place,” he added.
Abu Faour also said that he hoped such a force was used to liberate the captives
rather than in a “pseudo heroic [action] against the families.”But later in the
day, the families returned to the highway and blocked it again after the Nusra
Front reissued the threat to execute Bazzal in a tweet. The captors routinely
call the families and order them to block certain roads and hold demonstrations,
often threatening to kill the hostages if they fail to comply. Machnouk urged
the hostage families to ignore the kidnappers “who intend to destroy the
country, block roads and disrupt peoples’ businesses.”MP Walid Jumblatt
criticized the attack, saying in a tweet: “Those people [protesters] have
nothing but the shirts on their backs, while others block roads with real and
fake motorcades,” in reference to politicians who have barricades set up around
their homes and official buildings for security, causing traffic nightmares for
many
Aoun vows to
stand his ground in presidency bid
Hasan Lakkis/The Daily Star/Nov. 29, 2014
BEIRUT: MP Michel Aoun vowed Friday to keep pushing for the presidential seat,
defying former Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s call for the election of a consensus
candidate as the only solution to break the six-month-old presidential impasse.
The leader of the Free Patriotic Movement, who also heads the largest Christian
bloc in Parliament, insisted that he was the most popular Christian candidate,
and the only one who could win over March 14 votes.
He scoffed at local and foreign calls for rival Maronite leaders to agree on a
consensus candidate for the country’s top Christian post.
“Let them stop talking about an agreement among the Christians. There is one
faction that could secure a two-thirds majority with March 14 and that is the
Change and Reform bloc,” Aoun told The Daily Star in a sit-down interview at his
residence in Rabieh, north of Beirut.
The FPM enjoys the widest Christian following and Change and Reform is the
largest Christian bloc in Parliament, he added, hinting that he was the only
viable candidate for the presidency, which has been vacant for over six months.
“It is not easy to tell a person I want to negotiate with you in order to oust
you. This is disrespect and insolence,” Aoun said in a reference to March 14
calls for talks with the FPM leader over the presidency. “You cannot tell me I
want to talk with you about the manner to oust you in order to search for
another person in your place.”
Aoun’s comments came one day after Hariri said a consensus candidate was the
only solution to end the presidential deadlock in the country. In an interview
with LBCI TV at his Paris residence Thursday night, Hariri said Aoun could not
be elected president because he was opposed by the March 14 coalition, which has
nominated his Christian rival, Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea, for the
presidency.
Officials from the FPM and Hariri’s Future Movement have held several rounds of
talks earlier this year to discuss the presidency.
Aoun, who had met Hariri in Paris, was seeking the Future Movement’s support for
his presidential bid.
During the talks with Hariri, Aoun said, “we did not sign any contract or
agreement that promised me that I would become the president.’
Aoun, whose bloc along with that of Hezbollah and March 8 allies have thwarted a
quorum in Parliament since April to choose a president, vowed not to facilitate
the election of a successor to former President Michel Sleiman, whose six-year
term ended on May 25.
“I am not stopping anyone to go to elect a president. But I will not join them.
They have betrayed me five times in a row,” he said.
Nonetheless, Aoun believed the Future-led March 14 could work with Aoun better
than any other Christian leader.
He said that he would not let down the wide Christian backing he enjoys,
lamenting that the presidency was taken from him in 2008 when the foreign
ministers of Western countries allegedly told him he was their preferred
candidate.
Aoun claimed that foreign ministers from the United States, the United Kingdom,
France and Italy, as well as then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy, had all told
him that they wanted to see him as president.
However, Sleiman was chosen as president instead, he said, because the decision
was made that “Christian and Sunni representation needed to be harmonized.”
Aoun, who claimed that Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal had vetoed
his candidacy for the presidency, blamed “people trusted by the kingdom” for the
minister’s stance.
He refused to disclose the sources for the alleged Saudi veto. However, the FPM
leader said he did not rule out a change in the Saudi stance on his candidacy.
“I did not harm anyone and I want the Saudis’ friendship wherever I am. I am not
in discord with anyone in Saudi Arabia,” he added.
Aoun, whose bloc has filed a challenge with the Constitutional Council against
the extension of Parliament’s mandate for two years and seven months, described
the council’s rejection of the appeal as “a catastrophe.”
“This council will face a historic verdict and a national verdict [because it
did not annul the extension],” he said.
The 10-member Constitutional Council Friday unanimously rejected the challenge
against the extension of Parliament’s mandate, saying its decision was designed
to prevent further vacuums in state institutions.
Aoun called for respecting the Constitution, saying this did not exist as
constitutional amendments had been made in the past for presidential election
purposes.
“Violating and amending the Constitution have taken place in several stages.
With the election of Michel Sleiman, they violated the entire Constitution,” he
said. He added that he only demanded a constitutional amendment that allowed the
election of the president directly by the people.
Aoun rejected calls by his political opponents to become a key voter in the
presidential election and withdraw from the race as part of Plan B.
“If they wanted this, I am not Hariri. The same criteria should be applied to
the president of the republic, the Parliament speaker and the prime minister,”
he said.
He added that the country could not move forward when Najib Mikati was named
prime minister in 2012, replacing Hariri, “because he was besieged internally
and externally.”
“Representation should be given to all sects. ... We are aware of the situation.
But this is the second time in which they try to strike me as I was deprived
during the mandate of a president to whom I granted a Christian cover,” Aoun
said. “Their previous promises were a conspiracy against me. Based on this, once
bitten, twice shy.”
On the planned dialogue between Hezbollah and the Future Movement, Aoun said: “I
believe in the freedom of meetings. Everyone works for his interests. If there
was an agreement between us and Hezbollah, it is because we consider that the
country needs security. The security we achieved in the country was more
consensual than official security. There was a different balance of power. There
was a security consensus and we blended the will with force.”
Asked to comment on his call for “existential integration” with Hezbollah, Aoun
said: “I have explained this word and it was shameful to interpret it
differently. They want me to stay away from Hezbollah so that I can be accepted.
Those have forgotten what happened to the Kataeb in 1975. Besieging any party
that has power might [cause an explosion].”
Aoun rejected charges that he was against the Sunni community in Lebanon, saying
he spoke only about two Sunni employees whom he accused of violating the law.
Lebanese Constitutional Council rejects Parliament
extension challenge
Nov. 28, 2014/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: The Constitutional Council Friday rejected a challenge filed by MP
Michel Aoun’s Change and Reform bloc contesting Parliament’s vote to extend its
mandate by more than two and a half years. “The decision was made to prevent
further power vacuums in state institutions,” a statement at the end of the
meeting said. Lawmakers from the rival political coalitions – March 8 and March
14 – as well as independent MPs voted earlier this month to extend Parliament’s
mandate for two years and seven months by a 95-2 margin.
The move prompted Aoun’s bloc, whose MPs boycotted the vote, to file a challenge
against the extension with the Constitutional Council. The council statement
said that despite rejecting the appeal, it believes that the principle of
holding periodic elections “should not be breached,” and said tying elections to
a new electoral law violates the Constitution. It called for “immediate”
parliamentary elections once the extraordinary circumstances that prevented the
elections from taking place cease to exist. “Elections should be held
immediately ... without having to wait until the extension has expired," the
statement said. It said crippling state institutions, especially the presidency,
“is a flagrant violation of the Constitution.” The bloc filed a similar
challenge last year after Parliament voted to extend its term by 17 months, but
the council failed to meet at that time over a lack of quorum. A minimum of
eight members is needed to issue any valid decision by the 10-member council,
which is evenly split between Muslims and Christians. The Civil Movement for
Accountability, which opposed the extension, conceded defeat after the council
decision, a bitter loss for the group after relentless lobbying. “We have lost
again the second battle against extension because we are facing a political
class that has violated its authority,” read a statement released by the NGO
after the council’s rejection of the appeal. Fear of an institutional void does
not serve as a legitimate reason to reject the appeal, the CMA said, arguing
that “what we are living today is a void itself.”The council started looking
into the challenge last week amid protests by civil society activists who called
on the judges to annul Parliament’s decision.
Nusra reissues threat to kill captive
tonight unless prisoner freed
Nov. 28, 2014/Hashem Osseiran| The Daily Star
BEIRUT: The Nusra Front Friday reissued its threat to execute a Lebanese captive
in the evening unless the government frees a female terror suspect. “Eight hours
are left for the release of Joumana Hmeid before carrying out the death
[sentence] against the captive Ali Bazzal,” read a statement on a Nusra Twitter
page. The threat was posted around 3:30 p.m., meaning the deadline was around
11:30 p.m. Rana Fliti, wife of Bazzal, told The Daily Star in a phone interview
that an Arsal sheikh had traveled to the outskirts of the town around 6:15 p.m.
to meet with the captors in an attempt to save his life. Fliti slammed the
government for not being responsive, saying that not a single member of the
crisis cell tasked with overseeing the hostage case was responding to her calls,
or updating her on the situation.
She expressed hope that her husband would return safely and said she had full
confidence in Sheikh Mustafa Hujeiri, a former mediator who has helped families
of the hostages visit them. He was also credited, along with Health Minister
Wael Abu Faour, of saving other captives that the jihadis had threatened to
execute. The statement came after Nusra threatened Thursday to execute one of
the 26 Lebanese captives being held by jihadis on the northeast border unless
Lebanon release Hmeid within 24 hours. The statement said that if the government
wanted to prove that it was willing to carry out serious negotiations then it
should release Hmeid as a “good will gesture.”Hmeid was formally charged by
Military Prosecutor Saqr Saqr over involvement with Al-Qaeda-linked groups,
after she was caught driving a car rigged with 50 kilograms of explosives on the
Arsal-Labweh road last February. Hmeid is the first woman to be accused of
complicity with a terrorist organization since the spate of car bombs and
suicide attacks targeted areas seen as sympathetic to Hezbollah over the past
year and a half.
Nostalgic Salam opens first page of
Lebanon book fair
The Daily Star/Nov. 28, 2014 /BEIRUT: Prime Minister Tammam Salam Friday opened
the 58th annual Arabic Book Fair with an air of nostalgia as he recalled a
younger version of himself hunched over books his father had given him. “When I
was young, my late father Saeb Salam put me in a room after handing me three
books, and would prevent me from leaving before I read and summarized them,”
Salam said in the opening ceremony which took place in Biel, Beirut. Salam
alluded to the fact that his father was a fan of the late French novelist Victor
Hugo, given that two of the three novels he was handed were the Romantic-Gothic
novel the The Hunchback of Notre-Dame and the historical novel Les Miserables,
both of which were written by the renowned French author.
The third book, also a celebrated classic, was Ernest Hemingway’s novel, For
Whom the Bell Tolls. “This was my first lesson in the school of Saeb Salam and
the beginning of my relationship with the book,” Salam said. Even with the
overwhelming workload of a Prime Minister, Salam still “steals time away from
work” in order to bask in a book, he added. In further reminiscence, the premier
recalled a quote he had heard from his father, in which he says “politics is the
source of ignorance.”
According to Salam, the meaning behind the quote involves the fact that politics
consumes so much of an individual’s time that it prevents them from enjoying a
book and its benefits. “In days like these, ignorance has become abundant,” he
said in reference to the quote, while stressing that the noble meaning behind
politics had been lost to narrow personal interest of politicians that overlook
the needs of the state. Writers and intellectuals, however, will preserve
Lebanon’s “exceptional” role in innovative liberal thinking, he concluded.
Lebanon's security requires both arms
and dialogue: defense minister
The Daily Star/Nov. 28, 2014/BEIRUT: Lebanon requires both weapons and political
dialogue to protect the country, Defense Minister Samir Moqbel said Friday.
Equipping Lebanon with arms is necessary but there is an “equal need” for all
“rivals to meet over dialogue in order to agree over commonalities and central
national issues,” Moqbel said during a ceremony held in honor of the
Lebanese-Emirate day. The provisions of civil peace should serve as the
Lebanese’s top concern. Two other issues that follow in importance are
counterterrorism and the need to resolve the Syrian refugee crisis. Hezbollah
and the Future Movement are expected to launch dialogue after Former Prime
Minister Saad Hariri and Hezbollah Chief Hasan Nasrallah expressed their
willingness to talk. Hariri Thursday said that he strongly supported a
long-awaited dialogue between his Future Movement and Hezbollah.
Police remove south Lebanon highway
food stands
Mohammed Zaatari| The Daily Star/Nov. 28, 2014/SIDON, Lebanon: Police Friday
dismantled dozens of tents and kiosks that used to sell goods to motorists along
the south Lebanon highway between Zahrani and Abu al-Aswad near Sidon, drawing
angry reactions from the poor vendors. A security source told The Daily Star
that the move was taken as a security precaution since the road is used by the
Lebanese Army and UN peacekeeping force, UNIFIL. Police used force against
vendors who resisted they the destruction of their tents and wooden kiosks that
sold snacks, beverages, fruits and vegetables. Some vendors set fire to their
own structures to prevent the security forces from destroying them, while others
submitted to the police, and dismantled their tents.
Others burned tires on the highway to protest the closure. The source said the
new measure was implemented in agreement with Hezbollah and the Amal Movement,
which are the dominant powers in the south. The parties agreed that the kiosks
could be used to stage attacks, according to the source. Similar measures were
implemented along Sidon’s coastal road a year ago to facilitate UNIFIL’s
movement. U.N. peacekeepers have been targeted on more than one occasion by
roadside bombs planted on the highway since 2006.
Disgraced Jumblatt aide jailed 2
years, fined $3.45M in corruption case
The Daily Star/Nov. 28, 2014/BEIRUT: Disgraced businessman Bahij Abu Hamzeh was
sentenced Friday to two years in jail and ordered to pay $3.45 million over
charges of breach of trust and embezzling funds from the Safa football team,
which is sponsored by MP Walid Jumblatt, judicial sources told The Daily Star.
Friday’s decision marks the first sentence issued against Abu Hamzeh, the former
head of the board of trustees of Safa, who is facing several lawsuits by Safa
and Jumblatt. Abu Hamzeh’s lawyers have been petitioning for charges against the
defendant to be dropped. The case was filed by the chairman of the Safa football
team Issam Sayegh representing his team. Abu Hamzeh was earlier charged with
impersonating Sayegh by forging documents and using the counterfeit papers, but
that case was dismissed, a judicial source told The Daily Star. Abu Hamzeh still
faces several other charges filed by Jumblatt. The lawsuits are the culmination
of a dramatic deterioration of relations between Jumblatt and Abu Hamzeh, who
used to run Jumlatt's real estate endeavors and managed his private properties
for more than two decades. Abu Hamzeh’s family has consistently worked for the
Jumblatt family over the past century. In one of the lawsuits filed by Jumblatt,
he accused Abu Hamzeh and business partner Hussein Bdeir of selling him a piece
of land that did not actually exist. Abu Hamzeh is a chemical engineer and a
Middle East agent for the U.S. pharmaceutical company Upjohn, Abu Hamzeh lived
in Paris before moving to Lebanon in 1987 at the request of Jumblatt in order to
manage the PSP chief’s companies. he former head of the Association of Oil
Importing Companies and served as the head of Safa’s board of trustees.
Pope urges more Muslim opposition to
ISIS in Turkey
Nicole WinfieldSuzan Fraser| Associated Press
Nov. 28, 2014
ANKARA: Pope Francis condemned ISIS' assault on Christians and other religious
minorities in Iraq and Syria, as he arrived Friday in Turkey to encourage Muslim
leaders to take a stronger stand against extremists who twist religion to
justify terrorism.
Francis sought to offer a balanced message as he met with Turkish officials upon
his arrival in Ankara, his second trip to the Middle East this year. He
reaffirmed that military force was justified to halt the extremists' advance,
but called for greater dialogue between Christians, Muslims and people of all
faiths to end fundamentalism.
"Fanaticism and fundamentalism, as well as irrational fears which foster
misunderstanding and discrimination, need to be countered by the solidarity of
all believers," Francis told Turkish officials at President Recep Tayyip
Erdogan's massive new presidential palace.
Francis praised Turkey's welcome of some 1.6 million refugees and said the
international community had the "moral obligation" to help Ankara provide for
them.
The three-day visit comes at a sensitive moment for the Muslim nation, as it
weighs how to respond to the ISIS advance amid U.S. calls to get more engaged
with the international coalition fighting the extremists.
Turkey has accused the Islamic militant group of casting a shadow over Islam and
has said Muslim countries have a duty to stand up against the group's radical
views. Turkey is still negotiating with the United States over helping the
coalition: Turkey has been pressing for a safe haven and a no-fly zone along the
Syrian border with Turkey and also wants the coalition to go after Syrian
President Bashar Assad's regime.
In his remarks to Francis, Erdogan complained about rising Islamophobia in the
West and said prejudices against Muslims were helping fuel radical Islamic
groups in the Middle East and Africa.
"Those who feel defeated, wronged, oppressed and abandoned ... can become open
to being exploited by terror organizations," Erdogan said.
He said he hoped Francis' visit would strengthen ties between Christians and
Muslims, but the pope's visit was met largely with indifference in the Muslim
nation.
"I don't know what a Catholic leader is doing in a Muslim country," said Akay
Incebacak, an Istanbul resident ahead of Friday prayers at the Sisli Mosque. "We
need to discuss whether our religious leaders are welcome or met with that much
respect abroad."
The pope was greeted at Ankara's Esenboga Airport by a line of Turkish
dignitaries, headed by Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, as he descended the
steps of his plane. He inspected and greeted Turkish honor guards before heading
to the mausoleum of the Turkish republic's founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, where
he laid a wreath.
"My wish is that Turkey, which is a natural bridge between the two continents,
is not just a point of intersection, but at the same time a point where men and
women belonging to all cultures, ethnicity and religion live together in
dialogue," Francis wrote in a guest book at the mausoleum. Beyond the
geopolitical issues, the three-day visit will give Francis a chance to reach out
to Turkey's tiny Christian community - less than 1 percent of Turks are Catholic
- and visit with the spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians,
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I. Francis will tour two of Istanbul's most
impressive sites, the Hagia Sophia - the Byzantine church-turned-mosque that is
now a museum - and the nearby Sultan Ahmet mosque, Turkey's most important place
of Muslim worship. The Vatican's plans call for him to pause in the mosque for a
moment of "reflection."
The Vatican added a speech to Francis' itinerary Sunday at an event in which
some Syrian refugees are expected to attend. The absence of any meeting with a
group of refugees had raised eyebrows given that Francis had met with refugees
in Jordan and in the Palestinian territories and has made welcoming refugees a
major thrust of his papacy.
Security was tight: Turkish media reports said some 2,700 police officers would
be on duty during the Ankara leg of the trip alone, and that a court had issued
an order allowing police to stop and search cars and carry out random identity
checks on people along routes used by the pope. Francis waded into some local
controversy when he became the first head of state to be received by Erdogan at
his huge new palace in Ankara, a 1,000-room complex on once-protected farmland
and forest that dwarfs the White House and other European government palaces.
Francis, whose Spartan living conditions are well-known, met with the president
and prime minister and delivered a speech to Turkish dignitaries and diplomats
at the $620 million White Palace.
The Vatican dismissed a request by the Ankara branch of the Turkish Chamber of
Architects to boycott the meeting, saying Francis would be received wherever the
government chose to receive him.
March into middle ages
Nov. 28, 2014/The Daily Star
The unfolding situation in Yemen looks set to secure the country among the
world’s failed states, but in such a way that it will make Somalia appear like
Sweden.
Even before the Houthi rebels took over the capital Sanaa in September, the
country was on shaky ground. With one of the most militarized civilian
populations in the world, where the vast majority of individuals own a gun,
Al-Qaeda is making gains across the country, mainly in the south, where the U.S.
is involved in drone operations and more. There is no rule of law and dozens of
deaths go unreported, with tribal tensions leading to even more violence across
the country.
The former president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, is still hanging around – the only
dethroned Arab Spring leader not to have been killed, sent into exile or jailed
– and many believe he has a hand in the current Houthi advances, and seeks to
capitalize on the disorder and perhaps make a comeback. Recently added to a U.S.
sanctions list, he clearly hasn’t exactly retired from politics, and it appears
he still commands an armed force. And everywhere, we see foreign interference,
with external players seeking to manipulate affairs in Yemen for their own
advantage, and strengthen their position in the region. Nothing is being done
with the priorities of Yemenis in mind, in a replica of a scenario we have seen
elsewhere the Middle East.
It appears that the only hope now is for an internal reconciliation to be found,
as unlikely as that seems right now. But at the same time, the international
community must stop ignoring the growing crisis in Yemen as if it might simply
disappear, and act with decisiveness and swiftness if and when intervention on
the ground is needed.
Hariri: Consensus president sole solution
Hashem Osseiran/Hussein Dakroub/The Daily Star
Nov. 28, 2014
BEIRUT: The election of a consensus candidate is the only solution to end the
political deadlock that has left Lebanon without a president for more than six
months, former Prime Minister Saad Hariri said Thursday.
Hariri also strongly supported a long-awaited dialogue between his Future
Movement and Hezbollah, saying the talks with the influential Shiite party were
designed to defuse Sunni-Shiite tensions and shield the country against security
threats linked to the war in Syria.
He said Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun could not be elected
president because he was opposed by the March 14 coalition, which has nominated
Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea for the country’s top Christian post.
“Gen. Michel Aoun has a problem with the March 14 coalition. Since there is no
consensus over Michel Aoun, and no consensus over Samir Geagea, then let’s go
for a consensus president,” Hariri said during a sit-down interview at his Paris
residence with LBCI TV Thursday night. “A consensus president is the solution in
Lebanon.”
“The consensus candidate is one that everyone agrees upon, a candidate that
everyone supports to revive the country, a candidate that could address the
country’s problems and could hold talks with everyone,” Hariri said, adding that
the main function of dialogue would be to express the need for a consensus
candidate.
The head of the Future Movement said he was serious about holding dialogue with
Hezbollah to serve Lebanon’s interest.
“Dialogue [with Hezbollah] is important and it should take place. I am serious
about dialogue. I am for a serious dialogue in the national interest. I want the
election of a president in order for the economy to recover,” Hariri said,
adding: “One of the most important reasons for going to dialogue is to contain
Sunni-Shiite tensions.”
Hariri cited Hezbollah’s military intervention in Syria, its arsenal, the
Special Tribunal for Lebanon which is investigating former Prime Minister Rafik
Hariri’s 2005 assassination, and Hezbollah’s arming of the “Resistance Brigades”
as key contentious issues with the party.
He said the planned dialogue was not designed to offer a political cover for
Hezbollah’s intervention in Syria, adding that the Future Movement’s stance on
the conflict in Syria was to support the Syrian people and the opposition.
“We support the Syrians’ struggle for freedom. We are against the regime,”
Hariri said. He predicted the eventual downfall of President Bashar Assad’s
regime.
Hariri warned that his party could not tolerate a candidate who would maintain
relations with Assad, saying that he had lost legitimacy and only remained
standing because of support from Iran.
Commenting on an Iranian military gift to the Lebanese Army, which the
government has not yet accepted, Hariri said the best gift Iran can give to
Lebanon is to tell Hezbollah to withdraw from Syria.
Hariri said Speaker Nabih Berri and MP Walid Jumblatt were working to get the
Future-Hezbollah dialogue started. He said efforts were underway to prepare the
dialogue agenda. He ruled out a meeting for now between him and Hezbollah leader
Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah, saying that dialogue would be attended first by
officials from both parties.
“The dialogue [with Hezbollah] would not go into names of possible candidates.
It would just stress the need for a consensus candidate,” he added.
The presidency has been stalled due to a boycott of the presidential vote by
Aoun’s bloc and the Hezbollah-led March 8 alliance over the lack of a consensus
candidate.
Hariri has been living in self-imposed exile between France and Saudi Arabia for
more than three years over security concerns. He returned to Lebanon for a brief
visit in August after the clashes in the northeast border town of Arsal between
the Army and militants, announcing a $1 billion military grant from Saudi
Arabia.
It was the second major Saudi grant to Lebanese security forces announced within
a few months of each other. In December, then-President Michel Sleiman announced
a $3 billion Saudi aid package to the Lebanese Army.
Hariri praised King Abdullah bin Abdel-Aziz, saying the Saudi grants would
benefit all the Lebanese.
He said the Army and other security institutions would receive 30 military
aircraft and acquire the military equipment that was requested.
Hariri added that he returned to Lebanon for a brief stay in August because he
was concerned about the security situation, and for reasons related to the Saudi
grant, promising to return to Lebanon “very soon.”
Hariri flatly rejected any proposal to coordinate between the Lebanese and
Syrian armies amid the rise of jihadi groups like ISIS and the Nusra Front.
“Any coordination should take place with the [Syrian] opposition that rejects
ISIS and that also rejects Bashar Assad.”
Asked about October’s north Lebanon clashes between the Army and Islamist
militants that killed at least 43 people, including eight civilians and 11
soldiers, Hariri said that the military did well, but could have done better.
He said that he was against any March 14 figure who spoke against the Army. That
includes controversial north Lebanon lawmaker Khaled Daher, who has repeatedly
denounced Army actions, accusing it of targeting Sunnis.
“Sunni moderation is a part of Lebanese moderation,” Hariri said, arguing that
after his father’s assassination, the Sunni community did not resort to
terrorism or extremism. “Historically the Sunnis in Lebanon have been the
moderates,” the former premier said.
First Armenian peacekeeping mission
arrives in Lebanon
The Daily Star/Nov. 27, 2014/BEIRUT: The first Armenian peacekeeping contingent
has arrived in Lebanon as part of the UNIFIL mission along the southern region
bordering Israel. The Armenian Embassy in Lebanon told The Daily Star that the
32-strong contingent departed Wednesday night from Armenia and that the unit was
the first to serve in Lebanon. While Armenia has been part of several U.N.
peacekeeping forces since 2004, the country has long opposed sending troops to
Lebanon, over concerns for the large Armenian community in Lebanon. The issue
was broached during Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan's visit to Lebanon in
2012, and Armenia has had an observer in UNIFIL in preparation for the
contingent's arrival. According to Arka News Agency, the Armenian Parliament
ratified a technical agreement of cooperation signed by the Italian and Armenian
Defense ministries that would allow Armenia to contribute troops to the
peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, deployed as per U.N. Security Council
Resolution 1701. The agency said the Armenian peacekeepers would be deployed in
three southern villages, rotated every six months. The contingent would be
"ensuring respect for the safety of the U.N. staff," Arka reported. There are
approximately 100,000 Armenians in Lebanon, concentrated mainly in the capital’s
suburbs.
Iran is a nation with two governments
Amir Taheri /Asharq Al Awsat
Friday, 28 Nov, 2014
There has been no official announcement, but the negotiations that started in
Geneva last year may have landed Iran with two governments.
The de jure government is headed by “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei and his
entourage acting behind a façade that includes the presidency and the Islamic
Majlis (parliament). Its authority and responsibility are defined in the
Constitution which, though often violated, remains a point of reference. A de
facto government has emerged alongside that de jure government in the shape of a
bizarre animal named the P5+1 group. By buying into the so-called Geneva
agreement, or “Joint Plan of Action,” the de jure government implicitly
recognized the authority of the de facto government on a range of issues. The
seven month extension of the joint action plan in Vienna last week reaffirmed
that. The P5+1 have been granted the right of oversight on a range of issues. In
diplomatic jargon, this is called “droit de regard,” a French term applied when
a nation grants outside powers a say in its affairs. Though it does not amount
to a veto, droit de regard allows outsiders scope for shaping a nation’s
policies.
What are the rights that Tehran has implicitly granted to this parallel, or de
facto, outside authority? The first is the right to impose sanctions.
Under Presidents Khatami and Ahmadinejad, Iran’s position was that the six
layers of sanctions imposed most notably by the United States and the European
Union were both illegal and unjust. Iran demanded their lifting outright as a
precondition for negotiating on other subjects, notably the nuclear issue. Under
President Rouhani, those sanctions are still regarded as unjust, but no longer
as illegal.
Rouhani’s implicit acceptance of the legality of the sanctions is demonstrated
by his readiness to link their abrogation to concessions by Iran. Under the
Joint Plan of Action, Iran granted 23 concessions in exchange for 11 promises
from the P5+1, legalizing the sanctions.
The P5+1 speaks of keeping the sanctions in place for anything up to 25 years,
to test Iran’s goodwill. Rouhani wants to shorten that to five years. But if
something is illegal for 25 years it must also be illegal for five years, or
five minutes for that matter.
Something else has also happened. Under Khatami and Ahmadinejad, Iran regarded
the encounter with the P5+1 as an exchange of views, not formal negotiations.
The Iranian side was never led by a Cabinet minister who represented national
sovereignty but by an appointed official whose task was to listen to the views
of the P5+1 and inform them of Iran’s views but not to conduct negotiations
affecting national sovereignty.
That method was not chosen because Khatami and Ahmadinejad wanted to be awkward.
They acted in accordance with diplomatic practice established since the Treaties
of Westphalia in the 17th century. As a sovereign nation, Iran cannot negotiate
with an informal body that lacks any legal status.The P5+1 is an ad hoc group
that succeeded the so-called EU+3 consisting of the foreign ministers of
Britain, France and Germany. The P5+1 was born in the residence of then-British
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in London in 2006. Neither version of this ad hoc
group secured any legal status. It has no mandate from the United Nations, the
European Union or even individual member states.
Khatami and Ahmadinejad knew that international treaties are negotiated and, if
possible, concluded on the basis of strict legal equality between the parties
concerned, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
If nothing was signed in Geneva last year or in Vienna last week it is because
the P5+1 have no authority to sign anything on behalf of anybody. All that the
P5+1 can do is to recommend steps to their respective governments. We shall face
the same situation in seven months’ time.
Having ceded part of its sovereignty, Iran has found itself on a slippery slope
to further losses in that respect.
Here are just a few instances:
• The P5+1 have a say in how much oil Iran is allowed to export.
• They have a say in how much of its oil income Iran can access at any given
time.
• They decide what Iran should spend its own money on.
• With talk of “dual use,” they influence Iranian industrial policy across the
board by controlling imports of technology, machinery and spare-parts even for
civilian purposes.
• Through inspection of ships and airliners, they exercise “oversight” on
Iranian exports and imports.(Last year the German Customs office seized dozens
of cargoes destined for Iran.)
• The group restricts and modulates Iran’s access to capital markets while
supervising Iranian foreign payments through measures against the Central Bank
of Iran.
• More than 4,000 projects are frozen in Iran because foreign companies are not
prepared to invest or provide the technology needed until sanctions are lifted.
(On Monday Rouhani told a TV station in Tehran that foreign companies told him
that nothing can be done until sanctions are lifted).
• Even foreign nations not involved in the sanctions system observe them in
practice. India withdrew from a project for a gas pipeline from Iran. China
dropped out of a scheme to develop a major Iranian port on the Gulf of Oman.
Japan withdrew from a giant petrochemical project.
• The Iranian foreign minister is obliged to report to the P5+1 periodically.
Remarkably, he does not report to the Iranian parliament.
• Using the nuclear issue, the group seeks a say in Iran’s armament industries,
ostensibly to prevent development of missile warheads capable of carrying
nuclear payloads.
• They decide which Iranian students abroad can receive stipends.
• They decide how much uranium Iran can enrich and to what degree.
• They decide which Iranian officials and businessmen are allowed to travel
abroad.
• They decide what international conferences Iranian scientists can attend.
• They have a say in who Iran appoints as ambassadors. Four nominations were
vetoed last year, including that of the Iranian Ambassador to the United
Nations.
What is remarkable is that while Iran has frozen its nuclear industry since last
year, the P5+1 has allowed the sanctions’ machine to continue operating as
before. Since November 2013, the US and the EU have decreed 108 new sanctions
against Iranian companies, businessmen, scientists and even universities while
imposing fines on 13 international banks and companies for dealing with Iran.
True, the P5+1 agreed to release some 7 billion US dollars in frozen Iranian
assets. At the time of writing this article, 4.8 billion US dollars have
actually been released. However, in the same period, a further 12 billion US
dollars of Iranian income has been frozen. From now until July, the P5+1 will
release 700 million US dollars a month while, at the same time, freezing 1
billion US dollars each month. This means a net total of 300 million US dollars
of Iranian assets being frozen each and every month.
Is it not time for Iranians to ponder the consequences of a policy that could
put their nation under foreign tutelage for years, if not decades?
Lieberman's 'peace plan': Pay Israeli Arabs to move to Palestinian state
By Barak Ravid/Haaretz
Nov. 28, 2014
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.629008
Foreign minister publishes new party platform, says Israel should offer Arabs
'economic incentives' to leave in order to help resolve the 'duality and divided
loyalties from which they are suffering.'
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Friday published an updated platform for
his party, Yisrael Beiteinu, which includes a "peace plan" that calls on the
government to encourage the transfer of Israeli Arabs to a Palestinian state by
offering them "economic incentives."
The platform, which may be another sign that Knesset elections are forthcoming,
was published on the Yisrael Beiteinu website and reiterates declarations the
foreign minister has made over the past year. The diplomatic portion of the
platform, or its "peace plan," does not include clear positions on issues such
as Israel's borders, the status of Jerusalem or settlement construction and the
future of existing Israeli settlements.
The only subject that the plan addresses in detail is that of Israel's Arab
citizens. Lieberman repeated his proposal for land and population swaps between
Israel and a future Palestinian state, but took it a step further by encouraging
Israel to pay Arabs from Jaffa or Acre to move.
"As for Israeli Arabs, any agreement must include a plan for territorial and
population exchange," Lieberman writes in the platform. "An arrangement of this
kind with the Palestinian state will allow Israeli Arabs who do not identify
with the State of Israel to become part of the Palestinian state. This will,
first of all, resolve the problem of Arabs in the Wadi Ara triangle, adjacent to
the Palestinian territories, who will be able to become citizens of the
Palestinian state without leaving their homes."
Lieberman emphasized that his plan would allow Arabs from other parts of Israel,
such as Jaffa and Acre, "who feel that they are part of the Palestinian people,
to resolve this issue of duality and divided loyalties from which they are
suffering. Israel should even encourage them with economic incentives."
He said that while he is not giving up on the dream or the principle of Greater
Israel, he realizes Israel will have no choice but to reach a territorial
compromise. "In the argument over the unity of the land versus the unity of the
people – the latter takes precedence," Lieberman writes. "There can be no
compromise over the unity of the people and we will never be able to recover
from the loss of this unity."
At the same time, Lieberman claimed that peace with the Palestinians and the
establishment of a Palestinian state can only be achieved as part of a
comprehensive peace agreement with Arab states. The foreign minister presented
this view in a speech he gave several months ago; however he has yet to outline
how to attain such a deal.
Lieberman claims that left-wing politicians believe Israel should achieve peace
with the Palestinians first and then reach an agreement with other Arab states.
However, he writes, this formula has failed to yield results for more than 20
years, and also leads the Palestinians to believe they don’t have to compromise
on any of their demands.
In addition, Lieberman claims, achieving peace with the Palestinians won’t solve
the "problem" of Israeli Arabs' loyalty to Israel, nor will it end the conflict
between Israel and Arab nations or bring Israel the political and economic gains
that a comprehensive peace agreement would.
"Unlike the obsessive position of other parties, Yisrael Beiteinu understands
that the State of Israel's conflict is not just a territorial one with our
Palestinian neighbors, but a three-dimensional conflict: the Arab states, the
Palestinians and Israeli Arabs," Lieberman writes. "That is why any agreement
with the Palestinians must be part of a comprehensive agreement, including peace
agreements with Arab countries and territorial and population exchanges with
Israeli Arabs."
Lieberman did not elaborate on how to reach a comprehensive agreement, but said
it is possible because, "Many people now understand that the Palestinian problem
is not the main problem facing the Middle East, nor is it the main cause of
violence."
"The events of the Arab Spring in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and
elsewhere prove this," he writes. "Moderate Arab countries also understand that
the main threat to them today is not from Israel or from Zionism, but from
radical Islamic organizations like Isis, Jabhat al-Nusra, the Muslim
Brotherhood, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah. For the first time, therefore,
we can now reach a comprehensive agreement, the terms of which are reasonable
and acceptable to Israel."
Nigeria mosque blasts: 92 dead at one hospital morgue: AFP
reporter
Agence France Presse/Nov. 28, 2014 /KANO, Nigeria: At least 92 bodies were
counted in a Nigerian hospital morgue after a suicide bomb and gun attack at the
main mosque in Kano city, an AFP reporter said. The correspondent counted
the bodies at the Murtala Mohammed Specialist Hospital, where hundreds of people
used torchlights on their mobile phones in a desperate attempt to identify loved
ones. A resue official told AFP earlier that victims had been brought to at
least three other hospitals and emergency staff were working on updated casualty
figure.