LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
March 02/14
Question: "What did Jesus mean when He said 'I AM'?"
GotQuestions.org/Answer: Jesus, in response to the Pharisees’
question “Who do you think you are?” said “‘Your father Abraham
rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was
glad.’‘You are not yet fifty years old,’ the Jews said to him, ‘and
you have seen Abraham!’ ‘I tell you the truth,’ Jesus answered,
‘before Abraham was born, I am!’ At this, they picked up stones to
stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple
grounds.” The violent response of the Jews to Jesus’ “I AM”
statement indicates they clearly understood what He was
declaring—that He was the eternal, incarnate God. Jesus was equating
Himself with the "I AM" title God gave Himself in Exodus 3:14. If
Jesus had merely wanted to say He existed before Abraham’s time, He
would have said, “Before Abraham, I was.” The Greek words translated
“was” in the case of Abraham, and “am” in the case of Jesus, are
quite different. The words chosen by the Spirit make it clear that
Abraham was “brought into being,” but Jesus existed eternally (see
John 1:1). There is no doubt that the Jews understood what He was
saying because they took up stones to kill Him for making Himself
equal with God (John 5:18). Such a statement, if not true, was
blasphemy and the punishment ascribed by the Mosaic Law was death
(Leviticus 24:11-14). But Jesus committed no blasphemy; He was and
is God, the second Person of the Godhead, equal to the Father in
every way. Jesus used the same phrase “I AM” in seven declarations
about Himself. In all seven, He combines I AM with tremendous
metaphors which express His saving relationship toward the world.
All appear in the book of John. They are: I AM the Bread of Life
(John 6:35, 1, 48, 51); I AM the Light of the World (John 8:12); I
AM the Door of the Sheep (John 10:7,9); I AM the Good Shepherd (John
10:11, 14); I AM the Resurrection and the Life (John 11:25); I AM
the Way, the Truth and the Life (John 14:6); and I AM the True Vine
(John 15: 1,5).
Pope Francis's Tweet For Today
Let us thank all those who teach in Catholic schools.
Educating is an act of love; it is like giving life.
Pape François
Remercions tous ceux qui enseignent dans les écoles
catholiques. Éduquer est un acte d’amour, c’est comme donner la vie
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources For March 02/14
Iran Tells the World
Mere lies, Not what its actual vicious plans are/By: Elias Bejjani/March 01/14
The "Iran deal," Washington’s gravest mistake in Foreign Policy/By Dr. Walid
Phares/March 02/14
The Crises in Ukraine and Syria: Putin Caught In the Jaws of a Vise/By: Raghida Dergham/March 02/14
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources For March 02/14
Lebanese Related News
LF, Future emphasize unity despite difference over Cabinet
Beirut gas centers to shut down amidst fears of attack
Ban Urges Staging Presidential, Parliamentary Elections, Respecting Baabda Declaration
Report: Veiled Female Suicide Bombers Head to Lebanon
Remains of 2 rockets found on Mount Hermon; IAF strikes rocket launching site in
Gaza
Two Katyusha rockets that exploded overnight were found Saturday morning near
Israel’s border with Syria.
REPORT: Israel warns Lebanese gov't it will be responsible for any Hezbollah
retaliation
Suleiman: Shelling of Lebanese Border Towns Attempt to Drag Country to Syrian
Crisis
Report: Bassil, Qazzi Proposals to End Policy Statement Deadlock Met with
Rejection
Eichhorst: Hizbullah Was Urged to Exercise Restraint in Light of Israeli Strike
Over 4 Syrian Raids Hit Arsal Outskirts as al-Nusra Executes Assad Supporters
Israel warns Lebanon to curb Hezbollah reprisal
Lebanon police arrest kidnapper
Iran's support for resistance nonnegotiable: official
Miscellaneous Reports And News
Rouhani: 'Ethical principles' stop Iran from pursuing nukes
Russians strike Ukraine army post in Crimea. Kiev fears Ukraine army putsch. US
warships on standby
Russia does not rule out troops going to Crimea: official
Crimean Leader Claims Control, Asks Putin for Help
'Mentally Ill' Gaza Woman Killed by Israeli Fire
Saudi Hits back at Russia Criticism on Syria Arms
Syria Opposition National Council to Rejoin Coalition
Ex-Gitmo inmate faces Syrian terror charges in U.K.
U.S. Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford Retires
Israel Launches Air Raid on Gaza Rocket Launch Site
Iran Tells the World Mere lies, Not
what its actual vicious plans are
By: Elias Bejjani/March 01/14
Another and more dangerous Hitlerism military phenomenon is emerging in Iran,
while the USA Obama administration, Europe and many other countries are burying
their head in the sand and directly or indirectly helping in the emergence of
this scary and ruthless monster.
Sadly history is repeating itself with the same fatal European-Hitler Scenario,
and if lessons from world War two are not grasped and learned, the whole world
and not only the Middle East will be facing extremely serious and actual Iranian
threats, and possible military invasions.
These Iranian potential dangers will include Israel, all the Arab countries,
Turkey and all of Europe too. There is no doubt that once the Iranian Mullahs'
dictatorship regime puts its criminal and bloody hands on an atomic bomb he will
use it.
If the Western world countries specifically keeps on cajoling and appeasing the
Iranian aggressive and hostile regime the dire consequences will hit the whole
civilized world.
Below is a report that exhibits one of the most dangerous blinding camouflaging
tactics that the Iranian regime is resorting to in a bid to keep those countries
who are closing their eyes on its expansionism and hostile nature relaxed and
comatosed.
Who can buy Iran's rhetoric of ethical principles when it is militarily,
financially and by all other means strongly supporting the most brutal and
criminal regime in the world, the Syrian Assad regime. The Syrian regime with
the full help of Iran and its proxy Shiite Lebanese and Iraqi militant Militia
proxies has massacred in the last three years almost 300 thousand innocent
citizens of his own people, mostly women, children and elderly!!
Iran's president Rouhani as the below report tells is assuring the world that
his country and for ethical principles ca not pursue nukes!!
What a lie? Does he really think with his sick mind that the world will buy his
alleged fake claims!!
What are those ethical principles that the Iranian regime honors and practices
when it has been killing its own people, and brutally oppressing them.
What are those ethical principles that the Iranian regime honors and practices
when it fully runs and controls the most dangerous terrorist organizations in
the whole world!!
What are those ethical principles that the Iranian regime honors and practices
when it keeps on by force, religious denominational and military means
destabilizing the peace stability in all the Middle East countries from Yemen to
Lebanon.
Logic and reason necessitate that the Free world countries with all the Arab
regimes are seriously required to deal with the Iranian cancerous regime in a
completely different strategy from the current and ongoing one that has totally
failed and made the Iranian rulers more bold and more aggressive.
Background
Rouhani: 'Ethical principles' stop Iran from pursuing nukes
Reuters Published: 03.01.14, 10:04 / Ynetnews
Islamic republic's president says if his country wanted WMDs, it would make
chemical, biological weapons. Iran's president says the Islamic republic rejects
the manufacture of nuclear weapons out of principle, not because it is prevented
so by treaties. Hassan Rouhani also said that, had Iran wanted weapons of mass
destruction, it would be easier for it to make chemical or biological weapons.
He made the comments Saturday while addressing Iran's Defense Ministry
officials. Rouhani said that Iran's "beliefs" and commitment to "ethical
principles" prevent it from making a bomb. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei has already issued a religious decree banning the production and use of
nuclear weapons. He says having such arms is a sin. The US and its allies fear
that Iran seeks to develop the ability to make a nuclear weapon, should it want
one. Iran denies the charge. Earlier in the week, a Reuters report revealed that
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had shelved a major report on Iran
that might have revealed more of its alleged bomb-relevant research, but held
off because of the warming relations between Iran and the West. On Friday,
Israel urged the UN nuclear watchdog agency to go public with all information it
has regarding suspicions that Iran researched how to build an atomic bomb. "The
role of the IAEA is to expose to the international community all information
regarding military aspects of the Iranian nuclear project, and not to withhold
it for reasons of diplomatic sensitivity," Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister
Yuval Steinitz said in a statement.
Elias Bejjani
Canadian-Lebanese Human Rights activist, journalist and political commentator
Email phoenicia@hotmail.com
Web sites http://www.10452lccc.com & http://www.clhrf.com
Face Book https://www.facebook.com/elias.y.bejjani
Twitter Elias Bejjani@phoeniciaelias
Beirut gas centers to shut down amidst
fears of attack
March 01, 2014/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: Two centers for filling
gas canisters in Beirut's southern suburbs have been ordered to shut down after
security forces received information they could be targeted by terrorist
attacks, a security source told The Daily Star. Interior Minister Nouhad
Machnouq said in a statement that he ordered the centers, one in Bir Hasan and
the other in Ouzai, be shut down temporarily starting Monday, March 3. “As a
result of investigations with some detainees with regards to suicide attacks to
assassinate Lebanese figures, primarily Speaker Nabih Berri and former Minister
Wiam Wahhab, information was uncovered that suicide attacks were being planned
against gas centers in Ouzai and Bir Hasan,” Machnouq said. The centers would
remain closed until their supply of gas runs out. “In order to prevent gas
shortage in Beirut and the southern suburbs, Machnouq contacted centers in
Shouifet and Dora to meet the demand, knowing that one of the gas centers there
belongs to MP Walid Jumblatt, who had suspended its operations,” the minister
added.
Security measures were beefed up near Berri's residence Friday in the Ain el-Tinhe
neighborhood of Beirut following media reports that a suicide attack was being
planned to assassinate the Amal Movement leader. Two local dailies reported that
the Abullah Azzam Brigades planned to kill the speaker by sending suicide
bombers to attack his residence. According to the reports, Mahmoud Abu Alfa, a
member of the brigades who is currently in custody, told interrogators that he
was tasked by Sheikh Sirajeddine Zreiqat, a senior figure in the Brigades, with
devising a plan to attack Berri’s residence. Abu Alfa confessed that he
monitored Ain al-Tineh more than once, estimated the intensity of the explosives
needed to destroy the gates of Berri’s residence, and conveyed this information
to Zreiqat. Abu Alfa and a relative, identified only as "Hasan," were
apprehended in the Beirut area of Al-Tariq al-Jadideh last month. Both were
reportedly tasked with monitoring the area around former Environment Minister
Wiam Wahhab’s house in Bir Hasan. Wahhab is an ally of Syria. The Brigades have
also claimed responsibility for the two double suicide attacks that struck near
the Iranian embassy in Bir Hasan on November 19 and February 19. The Brigades
have declared war on Hezbollah and Iran over their role in the Syrian war, and
have carried out several attacks in predominantly-Shiite areas associated with
Hezbollah.
LF, Future emphasize unity despite difference over Cabinet
March 01, 2014/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanese Forces MP Antoine Zahra Saturday criticized the Future Movement
for taking part in a government with Hezbollah, but emphasized that the alliance
between the two parties remained strong.
Meanwhile, Future Movement Secretary General Ahmad Hariri also reiterated the
unity of the March 14 Coalition. "It is true that differences surfaced among the
March 14 forces with regards to participating in the government ... but the
coalition remained intact.” Speaking to a group of Lebanese in Victoria State
during a short trip to Australia, Hariri said March 14 was made up of
“independent figures who have their own opinions.”
“We are united in our principles, which we will never abandon,” he added. Prime
Minister Tammam Salam formed an all-embracing government last month after former
Prime Minister Saad Hariri and the Hezbollah-lead March 8 coalition reached a
deal mediated by MP Walid Jumblatt after10 months of political deadlock. Hariri
has said rising Sunni-Shiite tensions and deteriorating security in Lebanon were
behind his decision to take part in a new government with the aim of
safeguarding the country. The LF refrained from taking part in the government,
demanding Hezbollah commit to the Baabda Declaration, an agreement signed by
rival groups in 2012 to distance Lebanon from regional turmoil, particularly the
Syrian crisis. The March 14 coalition has been critical of Hezbollah's role in
Syria, blaming the resistance group for the series of car bombings mostly
targeting predominantly-Shiite areas associated with Hezbollah. Media reports
have said the dispute over the government has tainted ties between the head of
the LF, Samir Geagea, and Hariri. During a radio interview, Zahra was critical
of his allies in the Future Movement and said most of the Hariri’s reasons for
joining the government were not convincing. “The difference between us and our
allies in March 14 is that we asked for a written commitment from Hezbollah to
accept the Baabda Declaration as part of the policy statement,” he said,
referring to ongoing discussion about the Cabinet’s ministerial statement. He
said the LF was not pleased with the Future Movement’s decision but that the two
parties remained in contact. Zahra said he understood reasons behind his allies’
participation in the government, saying: "Hariri has the right to think about
the sectarian tensions but the other reasons for participating are not
convincing.” “We don't think we made a mistake by abstaining from participating
in the government because we have a certain strategy based on nation building,”
he said. Zahra also spoke about a recent meeting between Hariri and March 14's
rival, MP Michel Aoun, saying: “We would have preferred to have found out about
the Harir-Aoun meeting from them [the Future Movement] rather than from the
media.” “If the meeting was innocent, as Aoun claimed, why was it kept a
secret?” he asked. Zahra defended the March 14 coalition and said differences
between parties were only normal. “What unites the March 14 coalition is the
belief in a state and its institutions, and this alliance was decided by the
people rather than political elites ... the alliance is very difficult to
break,” he said.
Suleiman: Shelling of Lebanese Border
Towns Attempt to Drag Country to Syrian Crisis
Naharnet Newsdesk 01 March 2014/President Michel Suleiman condemned on Saturday
the latest shelling of Lebanese towns bordering Syria in the Bekaa region. He
said: “The shelling is an attempt to drag Lebanon towards the Syrian crisis.”
“It is unacceptable for innocent Lebanese people to pay the price for these
attempts,” he stressed. The president therefore called on all sides within Syria
to refrain from targeting Lebanese territories “under any excuse.”In addition,
Suleiman called on all Lebanese powers against getting involved in the Syrian
crisis and to respect the Baabda Declaration. On Friday, several rockets fired
from the Syrian side of the border landed on the town of Brital in the Bekaa
Valley. One of them caused material damage after hitting the house of a soldier.
Lebanese border towns in the Bekaa have frequently come under Syrian shelling
since the eruption of the uprising in the neighboring country and since
Hizbullah acknowledged that it had sent fighters to Syria to fight alongside the
ruling regime.
Report: Veiled Female Suicide Bombers Head to Lebanon
Naharnet Newsdesk 01 March 2014/The Lebanese army and the
Internal Security Forces are on a mission to hunt down a group of four veiled
women wearing explosives belts and who are tasked by Lebanese Sheikh Sirajeddine
Zouraykat of the Abdulllah Azzam Brigades to carry out suicide terrorist
attacks, the As Safir daily reported on Saturday. The women who were able to
leave the Syrian area of Yabrud and head to the northern Bekaa, are said to be
of Iraqi and Lebanese nationalities. They are tasked to execute suicide attacks
in religious places of a specific sectarian orientation, sources told the daily.
A security source told As Safir on condition of anonymity that detained
extremists, captured over the past few months, guided by Zouraykat, confessed
that Speaker Nabih Berri and former Minsiter Wiam Wahab were allegedly the
target of an assassination bid, and that Minister Ali al-Khalil and Amal
official Ahmad Baalbaki were being closely watched. The extremist cell detained
by the ISF Intelligence Branch includes Lebanese nationals Mahmoud and Hassan
Abou Aalfa, Palestinian Hussein Awali and another Lebanese of al-Jomaa. The
detained confessed of an ancillary cell that handles the transfer of suicide
bombers and booby- trapped cars form Syria to the Bekaa which are later
transferred to Beirut. The source added that the security apparatuses are
prosecuting members of the cell mainly in the Bekaa valley. Early in February,
the army intercepted a booby-trapped vehicle in the Bekaa region coming form
Syria's Yabrud and driven by three women. The car was going to be transported to
Beirut where it was to be handed over to would-be suicide-bombers.
Remains of 2 rockets found on Mount
Hermon; IAF strikes rocket launching site in Gaza
By YAAKOV LAPPIN, REUTERS 03/01/2014/J.Post/IDF says rockets appear to be errant
fire from fighting in Syria; Israeli Air Force strikes target in northern Gaza
to prevent an imminent threat; IDF shoots and kills Palestinian woman near Gaza
border fence. IDF soldiers recovered the remains of two Syrian rockets on Mount
Hermon on Saturday morning. The rockets exploded in the north at approximately
12:45 a.m. on Saturday. According to initial army assessments, the projectiles
were not deliberately aimed at Israel, but were fired in the course of battles
raging between the Syrian army and rebel forces north of the border.
Israeli official confirms: IAF hit missile convoy entering LebanonOn Friday
night, the Israel Air Force carried out an air strike in northern Gaza. An IDF
spokeswoman said the strike targeted a rocket launcher that posed an immediate
threat to Israeli security. There were no reports of injuries in the strike.
Earlier this week, the IDF Northern Command remained on a heightened state of
alert, a day after Hezbollah threatened retaliation for an alleged Israeli air
strike on a site in eastern Lebanon in which illicit weapons were being moved by
the terrorist organization. The state of alert can be seen as a natural response
to Hezbollah's threats, but is not a necessary indication of an imminent flare
up along the border. Also on Saturday morning, the IDF shot and killed a
Palestinian woman in the Gaza Strip in an area near the border that Israel has
declared a no-go zone for Palestinians, local hospital officials said. Gaza
residents said it was not clear why 50-year-old Amna Qdaih, who they said
suffered from a mental illness, was near the security fence that runs between
Israel and Gaza.
Two Katyusha rockets that exploded overnight were found
Saturday morning near Israel’s border with Syria.
BY TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF March 1, 2014/The projectiles were heard
erupting loudly just after midnight Saturday in the Golan Heights. The IDF began
their search Saturday morning, and the remains of the rockets were found several
hours later in the Hermon Mountain area. The rockets were believed to have been
lobbed into Israel as a result of fighting between Syrian President Bashar Assad
and rebel forces, but there was a possibility that groups in Lebanon may have
launched the them.There were no injuries or damages caused by the landing of the
rockets in Israeli territory.
Report: Bassil, Qazzi Proposals to End
Policy Statement Deadlock Met with Rejection
Naharnet Newsdesk 01 March 2014/Efforts to come up with a policy
statement have so far failed as various proposals by the ministers at the panel
tasked with the mission have been met with rejection by the rival March 8 and 14
camps, reported the daily An Nahar on Saturday. It said that Foreign Minister
Jebran Bassil and Labor Minister Sejaan Qazzi came up with two different
proposals that do not include points of contention, but they were rejected.
Bassil proposed that the government “forgo a ministerial statement altogether
and that it suffice by saying that it is a cabinet of national interest that
will not spare any effort to serve the nation.”
For his part, Qazzi hailed Bassil's suggestion, describing it as a “good idea,”
but he then made a proposal of his own. The minister suggested that the
ministerial statement be comprised of single page that includes general
principles that are not related to the March 8 or 14 camps. The principles
adhere to the state alone, he explained. The proposal was however rejected by
the March 8 representatives of the ministerial panel, with State Minister for
Parliamentary Affairs Mohammed Fneish demanding that the word “resistance” be
included in the statement. The word resistance should be included without
associating it with the state, he added.
Fneish's suggestion was advocated by Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil.
Telecommunications Minister Butros Harb then interjected and said that issues of
contention should be presented at cabinet, but this was rejected by Prime
Minister Tammam Salam who explained that this proposal undermines the panel's
competency. “I was patient for ten months until the government was formed and
you should also be patient, but we cannot be made to wait for a long time,” he
declared according to An Nahar. The gatherers agreed to hold their eighth
meeting at 6:30 pm on Monday. The main issues of contention over the policy
statement lie in the March 8 demand that it refer to the resistance and
“army-people-resistance” formula, while the March 14 camp has been insisting
that the Baabda Declaration be mentioned in the statement.
Both camps are rejecting the other side's proposals. Salam has announced that
his government's mission is combating terrorism and preparing for the upcoming
presidential elections.
Ban Urges Staging Presidential, Parliamentary Elections,
Respecting Baabda Declaration
Naharnet Newsdesk 01 March 2014/United Nations Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon hailed the formation of a new Lebanese government, hoping that it
will pave the way for Lebanon to meet its constitutional deadlines.
He hoped that Lebanon will hold the presidential and parliamentary elections on
time, as well as respect the Baabda Declaration. He made his remarks during his
latest report on the implementation of U.N. Security Council resolution 1701. He
noted that Lebanon is still being “negatively affected bu the war in Syria,”
condemning the shelling and gunfire targeting the Lebanese-Syrian border.
He also condemned the flow of gunmen and arms between the two countries. The
lack of progress in demarcating the border between Lebanon and Syria does not
justify the violation of Lebanon's sovereignty by any side, stressed Ban. The
U.N. chief demanded the Syrian government and all sides fighting in Syria to
stop the violations against Lebanon's border and respect its sovereignty in
accordance with resolutions 1559, 1680, and 1701.
He also slammed the Lebanese citizens' participation in the war in Syria, saying
that it violates the policies of neutrality and disassociation adopted by the
Lebanese government and stipulated in the Baabda Declaration.
He therefore urged the concerned sides to act in a manner that serves Lebanon's
interests and adhere to the policy of disassociation. His report also addressed
the various terrorist bombings that have taken place in Lebanon in recent
months, explaining that supporting state institutions, including the army and
security forces, is the “best way to confront these haphazard and unacceptable
acts.”In addition, Ban remarked that Hizbullah and other parties' possession of
weapons outside the authority of the state still represents a threat to
Lebanon's sovereignty and security and a violation of the country's obligations
towards resolutions 1559 and 1701. He noted that President Michel Suleiman had
repeatedly demanded that a national defense strategy be devised in light of
Hizbullah's employment of its weapons outside of Lebanon's borders. To that end,
he urged all Lebanese powers to return to the national dialogue table in order
to tackle the issue of the possession of weapons. In addition, the U.N. chief
hailed Suleiman's role in asserting the importance of the Baabda Declaration and
the Maronite Patriarchate for the Bkirki Charter that it issued on February 9.
Ban also “warmly welcomed” the formation of a new government, calling on
Lebanese leaders to “take advantage of their constructive partnership in order
to preserve vital state institutions.” Holding the presidential elections within
their constitutional and legal deadline in May is very important in preserving
trust and stability in Lebanon, he stressed. This same importance applies to
then holding the parliamentary elections “without delay and according to the
constitution,” he continued.
Eichhorst: Hizbullah Was Urged to Exercise Restraint in Light of Israeli Strike
Naharnet Newsdesk 01 March 2014/European Union Ambassador to Lebanon Angelina
Eichhorst hoped that all sides in Lebanon would avoid any escalation in
retaliation to Israel's strike against a Hizbullah position earlier this week,
reported As Safir newspaper on Saturday. She told the daily that diplomatic
channels urged Hizbullah to exercise restraint. Moreover, meetings were held
with United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon officials to that end. They know
that it is in no one's interest for the situation to escalate, added the
ambassador. Efforts are being exerted by all sides in order to ease the
tensions, said Eichhorst. The 38 countries contributing to UNIFIL have a serious
desire to respect United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, she stressed
to As Safir. Israeli jets on Monday struck a Hizbullah position near the
Lebanese-Syrian border. The party acknowledged the strike on Wednesday, saying
that it targeted a Hizbullah position near the Jinta region in the Bekaa. It
vowed that it will choose the appropriate time and place to retaliate to the
attack. Addressing terrorist bombings that have taken place in Lebanon over the
past months, Eichhorst said that security in the country should be a priority
and the people should not be left in a constant state of concern over such
attacks. There is an international and European will to bolster support for all
of the security forces in Lebanon, starting with the army, she remarked. The EU
ambassador revealed that the coordinator of the EU counter-terrorism Gilles de
Kerchove is scheduled to visit Lebanon in the next two weeks in order to explain
to Lebanese authorities Europe's policy to combat terrorism. Lebanon should have
a national policy to combat terrorism, noted Eichhorst.
Policy Statement Panel Fails Anew to Reach Consensus as
March 14 Says Positive but 'Not at State Expense'
Naharnet Newsdesk 28 February 2014/The committee drafting the
ministerial policy statement on Friday failed again to reach an agreement on the
clause related to resisting Israel as the March 14 forces insisted on “the
state's authority over everything.”“We still have disagreements over some
points, including the resistance topic and some other points related to
sovereignty,” Labor Minister Sejaan Qazzi, the Phalange Party's representative
in the panel, announced after the meeting at the Grand Serail. “We're positive
in dealing with all issues and we want the cabinet to start its work, especially
that the president will head to Paris to take part in the meeting of the
International Support Group for Lebanon,” Qazzi added. “We are positive but not
at the expense of the principles according to which we took part in cabinet,
which involve the state's authority over all decisions taken on Lebanese
territory, whether at the political, strategic or military level,” the minister
went on to say. He noted that the panel has not reached a final agreement but
was not also before a dead end.
Asked about a meeting held by March 14 ministers and Health Minister Wael Abou
Faour at the telecom ministry building prior to the meeting, Qazzi said: “Ahead
of every session, we meet together, not only as March 14 ministers, but also
with all the ministers who are inside and outside the panel. These meetings are
positive and are not aimed at obstructing the sessions." Earlier, MTV reported
that Qazzi, Abou Faour, Telecom Minister Butros Harb and Interior Minister
Nouhad al-Mashnouq had held a meeting ahead of the session. "The main obstacle
is revolving around defining the relation between the state and the resistance,"
said Qazzi. "I'm willing to offer concessions on issues that are maybe related
to March 14, but we're not willing to offer concessions over matters related to
the Lebanese state. This is about the state's role and it is not a textual
dispute," he stressed. Also speaking after the session, the panel's spokesman
Abou Faour said "there are issues that are still under discussion but things
have not reached a dead end." "Political talks will be held inside and
outside the panel and I hope we will be able to reach an agreement that leads to
endorsing the policy statement during the next session," he said, noting that
the National Struggle Front led by MP Walid Jumblat is not the only party that
is exerting efforts. "A large number of formulas were discussed but none enjoyed
consensus," Abou Faour revealed. "The positive thing in discussions is Lebanon's
right to resist Israel and preserve its fortunes but the debate is revolving
around the state's role in resistance," he said. Abou Faour added: "A concise
policy statement would have been better but no agreement was reached over this
proposal and despite all this, all political forces are feeling the pressure of
the public opinion regarding the need to endorse it." Meanwhile, Hizbullah's al-Manar
television quoted Abou Faour as saying that he has “sensed a real step backwards
in the stance of the March 14 forces on the policy statement.”
“Away from cameras, Abou Faour said he is pessimistic and he called (former
premier) MP Saad Hariri after the meeting,” al-Manar said, noting that Abou
Faour's meeting with ex-PM Fouad Saniora “failed to reach any solution.”The
committee's meeting is the seventh since Prime Minister Tammam Salam's cabinet
was formed two weeks ago.
Salam has announced that his government's mission is combating terrorism and
preparing for the upcoming presidential election.
Over 4 Syrian Raids Hit Arsal Outskirts as al-Nusra
Executes Assad Supporters
Naharnet Newsdesk 28 February 2014/Syrian warplanes on Friday
carried out several raids on several areas in the outskirts of the eastern
border town of Arsal in the Bekaa, the state-run National News Agency reported,
as al-Nusra Front executed two men who support the regime. "Syrian fighter jets
launched strikes on the al-Zamarani valley in the Arsal region," NNA said in the
afternoon. And as Al-Arabiya TV reported three afternoon airstrikes, it quoted
the rebel Syrian Revolution General Commission as saying that "22 airstrikes
have targeted Qalamoun's mountains in Syria and Lebanon's Arsal." Later, NNA
said the bodies of a Syrian young man and a Syrian young woman who were killed
in clashes in Qalamoun in addition to five wounded people were transported to a
field hospital in Arsal. Earlier on Friday, media reports said Syrian military
planes bombarded the Lebanese border areas of Khirbet Younin, Wadi Hmeid and
Ajram. NNA said the Syrian airstrikes targeted the towns with four rockets.
Voice of Lebanon radio (93.3) reported that the raids targeted a gathering for
the Syrian opposition in the town of Khirbet Younin. Rockets from the Syrian
side of the border have frequently landed in Arsal since the uprising in the
neighboring country turned violent. The Arsal area is broadly supportive of the
Sunni-dominated uprising against Syrian President Bashar Assad. The mountainous
area has long been a smuggling haven, with multiple routes into Syria that have
been used since the conflict began in March 2011 to transport weapons and
fighters. Hermel and others areas in the Bekaa have also been targeted by
rockets fired from Syria in recent months and most attacks were claimed by
Syrian rebels. Meanwhile, the news agency reported that al-Nusra Front in
Lebanon executed two Syrians, who are pro-Assad regime, on the outskirts of
Arsal. The NNA said that Mohammed and Ali al-Kouz were charged with
collaborating with the Assad regime. The Nusra Front had previously handed out
leaflets accusing 12 Syrians of cooperating with the regime.
Lebanon police arrest kidnapper
March 01, 2014 02:39 PM The Daily Star /BEIRUT: Lebanon police
has arrested a wanted man who confessed to abducting 10 people for a ransom and
being part of a network of Lebanese and Syrian kidnappers.
Internal Security Forces Information Branch arrested a man identified by his
initials, Z.K., 35, also known as Ziyad al-Nahr, who was wanted on suspicion of
kidnapping people in a "sensitive border area," according to an ISF statement.
The suspect was wanted for a number of other judicial warrants as well. During
interrogation, he confessed to kidnapping around 10 Syrians after luring them
from Syrian territory, Beirut and Mount Lebanon to the northern city of Tripoli
using a man or woman as bait. Upon arriving to Tripoli, the victims would then
be transferred to a northern border area where the kidnapper would hold them
until their relatives paid a ransom.
He also told investigators that there were a number of Lebanese and Syrian
groups that carry out similar abductions. The police are in pursuit of the group
members.
Iran's support for resistance
nonnegotiable: official
February 28, 2014/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Iranian official Alaeddine Boroujerdi said Friday his country's support
for the resistance was nonnegotiable in the context of ongoing talks over
Tehran’s nuclear activities with the West. “The nuclear negotiations are purely
over the nuclear issue and do not include any other item,” Boroujerdi, the head
of Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee told
reporters after meeting Salam at the Grand Serail. “We cannot trade our defense
and embrace of the resistance for anything else and this is a solid political
policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he added, referring to Hezbollah.
Boroujerdi, who arrived in Beirut Thursday following a trip to Damascus, also
said that he briefed Salam on the latest developments in talks between Iran and
the P5 1.
"Every success achieved by the Islamic Republic of Iran on the international
level reflects positively on strengthening security and stability in the region
in general,” he said.
He described his meeting with Salam as “very good,” and handed the prime
minister a congratulatory letter from the first deputy of the Iranian president
on the formation of a new government.
Boroujerdi also said he expressed Tehran’s condemnations of the Israeli raid in
the Bekaa earlier this week, emphasizing Iran's “solid stance in supporting
sisterly Lebanon, its unity, sovereignty, security and independence, as well as
our support for the resistance whether in Syria or Lebanon.”
"We also exchanged views on several issues concerning security developments in
Lebanon, and we think such discussion contributes positively to strengthening
security here, which is of interest to the Lebanese and the Iranians as well.”
Boroujerdi also said he asked Salam to have his government pay special attention
to two cases: the 1982 abduction of Iranian diplomats on Lebanese soil and the
disappearance of Imam Musa Sadr. Accompanied by Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon
Ghazanfar Runknabadi, Boroujerdi visited Hezbollah's martyrs’ graveyard and
placed a wreath on the grave of slain Hezbollah commander Imad Mughniyeh.
He also visited the grave of Iranian diplomat Radwan Fares who was killed in
last November's twin attack against the Iranian Embassy in the Beirut
neighborhood in Bir Hasan.
Boroujerdi also visited Speaker Nabih Berri in Ain el-Tineh where he briefed the
Lebanese politician on the outcome of his visit to Damascus where he held a
series of meetings with Syrian officials. Speaking to reporters after talks with
Berri, Boroujerdi said Lebanese officials were in agreement that the only
solution to the crisis in Syria was a political one.
He also said that he spoke with Lebanese officials about the ongoing efforts to
combat terrorism in the country, saying Iran would help Lebanon in this regard.
The "Iran deal," Washington’s gravest mistake in Foreign
Policy
By Dr. Walid Phares /The Obama administration, in its first and second terms, has committed strategic
mistakes in the Middle East which will undermine U.S. national and security
interests for many years, even under subsequent administrations after 2016.
The damage done is severe, and a remedy seems out of reach unless earth
shattering changes are applied to Washington’s foreign policy—either under the
incumbent’s administration or the next. The common core of U.S. strategic
mistakes has been the perception of partners in the region since day one of the
post-Bush presidency. While Bush’s narrative on backing pro-democracy forces was
right on track, the bureaucracy’s actions betrayed the White House’s global aim.
By the time the Obama administration installed itself on Pennsylvania Avenue in
2009, little had been accomplished by the Bush bureaucrats in regards to
identifying these pro-democracy forces and supporting them. When the current
administration replaced Bush, however, civil society groups in the Middle East
were systematically abandoned—aid to their liberal forces was cut off and
engagement with the radicals became priority. The mistakes of the Bush
bureaucracy became the official policy of the Obama administration.
Washington’s “new beginnings” in the region moved American Mideast policy in a
backward direction on two major tracks. The first derailment was to partner with
the Muslim Brotherhood, not the secular NGOs, in an attempt to define the future
of Arab Sunni countries. The second was to engage the Iranian regime, not its
opposition, in attempt to define future relations with the Shia sphere of the
region. These were strategic policy decisions planned years before the Arab
Spring, not a pragmatic search for solutions as upheavals began. Choosing the
Islamists over the Muslim moderates and reformers has been an academically
suggested strategy adapted to potential interests—even though it represents an
approach contrary to historically successful pathways. In June 2009, President
Obama sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader asking for “engagement.” This move,
coupled with Obama’s abandonment of the civil revolt in Iran that same month,
sent a comforting message to the ruling Khomeinists: The United States is
retreating from containment and will not support regime change in Iran. That
undeniably emboldened Tehran to go on the offensive in the region after less
than a decade of status quo.
The nuclear program was boldly defended despite American and UN economic
sanctions; Iranian penetration of Iraq deepened; support to Hezbollah escalated
with a presidential visit to Lebanon by Ahmedinijad; and aggressive backing of
pro-Iranian elements in Arabia was sustained. The Arab Spring revealed more
assertive Iranian behavior as Pasdaran and Hezbollah militias were dispatched to
Syria in support of the struggling Assad regime. Across the region, the
Ayatollahs increased their support to regimes and organizations bent on crushing
civil society uprisings and also clamped down on their own oppositions—both
inside the country and abroad. Tehran used Washington’s unending search for
dialogue with the Ayatollahs as an opportunity to attack the exiled Iranian
community inside Iraq, one of the best cards in the international community’s
hands to pressure the Iranian regime. The tragedy of dismantling Camp Ashraf ran
parallel to a systematic persecution of Iranian dissidents who rose in 2009
against the mullahs. U.S. retreat from Iran’s containment led to an unparalleled
bleeding of the political opposition, the only long term hope for a real change
in Iran.
The Obama administration’s abandonment of Iran’s people was made complete
through Washington’s dangerous deal with Tehran. After months of secret
negotiations and immediately after abandoning the Syrian opposition to vie for
themselves against Iranian-backed Assad forces towards the end of the summer,
the U.S. administration announced an interim nuclear agreement with Iran. To the
astonishment of Iran’s opposition, not to mention Arab moderate governments,
European countries including France, and a majority in Congress, the Obama
administration began easing sanctions on Iran in return for a promise by the
Khomeinist regime that it would lower its uranium production to an
internationally acceptable level. Without any significant leverage on Tehran,
having sidelined the Iranian opposition, the White House has no guarantees that
Iran’s regime is backing off from nuclear strategic weaponry. Worse, Washington
started almost immediately to transfer billions of dollars from “frozen
accounts” back to the Iran regime’s coffers.
From an initial conceptual strategic mistake, the Obama administration moved to
implement the most dangerous component of the new policy: Not only ending
economic and political pressure, but sending financial support to a terror
regime still on the offensive in the region. The hundreds of millions of dollars
already received by the Ayatollahs can be, and actually most likely are being,
recycled through the Pasdaran into subversive operations against the country’s
liberal opposition, the Iranian exiles, Arab governments and U.S. interests
worldwide. The “deal” will go down in history as one of the worst political acts
in the West, second only to the signing of a piece of paper in Munich that
claimed to be a deal to save the Peace. History has already taught the world, at
a very high price, the consequences of dealing with devils.
The Crises in Ukraine and Syria: Putin Caught In the Jaws of a Vise
By: Raghida Dergham
(Translation - Karim Traboulsi)
Russia did not yet lose all its cards in Ukraine, and will not be on the retreat
just yet in Syria, as a result of the setback it suffered in the aftermath of
the Ukrainian revolution. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s revenge for what
happened in Kiev’s answer to Tahrir Square – while he was preoccupied with the
Winter Olympics in Sochi – may yet come.
The United States and the European Union are aware of the painful instruments of
revenge that Putin has at his disposal, as they are aware of the limits of
European economic power and U.S. political power under President Barack Obama.
For this reason, Western powers are walking a tightrope in dealing with the
developments in Ukraine, all while stressing that this is neither a strategic
confrontation nor a return to the Cold War.
For its part, Moscow interprets the events in Ukraine differently, and is
suspicious of Western intentions there. However, Moscow also recognizes that
resorting to revenge would be a double-edged sword in its backyard in Ukraine as
in Syria, which has become an arena for Moscow’s regional and international
resurgence and also in the context of the relationship with the U.S.
For these reasons, the Western-Russian dialogue may produce accords that include
Ukraine, Syria, and cooperation on issues like Iran and others. Yet the tone of
revenge may prevail instead, with the differences leading to escalation and
confrontations in Ukraine, Syria, and beyond. This will depend not only on what
the Russian president has up its sleeves, but also on what President Obama has
in mind vis-à-vis the Ukrainian and Syrian revolutions, and U.S. strategic
foreign policy as a whole.
One of the remarkable scenes during the Ukrainian revolution was how members of
the Berkut, Ukraine’s notorious riot police, kneeled down to apologize to the
people for the deaths that occurred during the crackdown and assault on the
protesters. This is something that would be a rare sight in the Arab region.
Military defections during and after the revolutions in the Arab region were
important no doubt, and are close to being apologies and rectifications. But
kneeling down is probably the most eloquent form of rare apology. If only the
Arab forces of repression would kneel down before their peoples. If only the
army forces bombarding the people and the leaders that are starving them kneel
down and apologize.
The other important event was that the Ukrainian parliament called for referring
ousted President Viktor Yanukovych to the International Criminal Court in The
Hague to hold him and anyone else participating in the murder of more than 100
protesters and wounding more than 2,000 in Kiev last week accountable. This is
also an important chapter in accountability for crimes against humanity and war
crimes, which most Arab parliaments would not be able to demand because the
majority of Arab countries did not rarify the Rome Statute establishing the ICC.
The regimes themselves have rejected this court fearing for themselves. Instead,
referring those who commit such crimes to the ICC in their case requires an UN
Security Council resolution.
There is an important demand making its way to the United Nations – and facing
fierce opposition – to prevent any of the five permanent members of the Security
Council to veto resolutions pertaining to war crimes and crimes against
humanity.
Christian Wenaweser, the president of the Assembly of States Parties of the
International Criminal Court and Ambassador of Liechtenstein to the United
Nations, and Prince Zeid bin Raad, Permanent Representative of Jordan to the
United Nations, are leading the effort to remove war crimes and crimes against
humanity from the grip of Security Council vetoes and place them solely in the
hands of the ICC. This is a commendable effort because holding rulers and anyone
who resorts to rape and starvation – in addition to the usual criminal methods –
as a war tactic accountable, is now the sole purview of the five veto-wielding
members of the UN Security Council. It is time to liberate these issues from
their grip, especially concerning what is happening in Syria , and the
Russian-Chinese stance on the Syrian question, at the Security Council.
On Saturday, February 22, the Council passed resolution 2139, which calls for
securing humanitarian aid to the Syrians – including across the border – after a
surprising unanimous vote. The timing of the vote was an important factor in
securing a consensus, as the Western and Arab countries backing the draft
resolution insisted on putting it to a vote before the closing ceremony of the
Winter Olympics in Russia. The goal was to use this time margin to embarrass
Vladimir Putin, who was adamant about polishing Russia’s reputation during the
games.
The protests in Kiev’s Independence Square and the Western-Arab efforts to vote
on a draft resolution concerning the humanitarian tragedy in Syria in New York
has put Putin effectively in the jaws of a vise. Ukrainian developments has
focused the spotlight on Putin and intensified Western pressure on him. The
Syrian developments would have exposed Putin internationally even more if he had
prevented the UN Security Council from passing a humanitarian resolution. The
timing of the push for resolution 2139 was therefore right, but other factors
have also played a role.
True, the Western-Arab draft resolution was stripped of references to punitive
measures in the event of Damascus’s non-compliance. True as well, it removed
references to Lebanese Hezbollah and the Iranian Qods Force in the context of
the broader terrorist intervention in Syria. And true, negotiations over the
resolution were fierce, in order to open the door later to its interpretation in
the battle of interpretations. But the fact of the matter is that the grip of
the Russian-Chinese veto on UN Security Council draft resolutions on Syria has
been relaxed for the first time in the wake of the dual vetoes that have been
wielded three times so far – bar the resolution on dismantling the Syrian
chemical weapons, as the U.S. backed down from carrying a strike against Syria,
passed by the Council last fall.
China played an important role in gathering consensus on resolution 2139, making
it clear to Russia and other members of the Security Council in New York that it
found it difficult to veto a humanitarian resolution that does not contain
references to subsequent measures or any action that would force the
stakeholders to implement the resolution.
China has always let Russia lead on the Syrian question, even hiding behind
Russia’s leadership. This time, China stuck out its neck outside the pit where
it was burying its head. The reasons for this are not entirely clear – as usual
when it comes to China – and China’s most recent position may not be a major
factor that prompted Russia to adjust its position. Instead, it could be that
Russia and China are playing different roles in coordination with one another.
Perhaps Vladimir Putin has taken stock of the shifts in the U.S.-Saudi
relationship as regards the Syrian issue, after Riyadh criminalized for Saudi
citizens to join the fighting in Syria, and transferred responsibility for the
Syrian dossier from Prince Bandar bin Sultan to Prince Mohammad bin Nayef. These
are reassuring indicators, because, for one thing, they illustrate the Saudi
determination to stop any contribution coming from its side to the
“Afghanization” of Syria.
However, President Obama's visit to Riyadh late next month has opened the door
to making strategic U.S.-Saudi understandings. This concerns Moscow, which wants
to monopolize the Syrian issue to the tune of American isolationism and its
evasion of its responsibilities in Syria.
In other words, Moscow might be reassured by any Saudi contribution in repelling
Islamist extremism, especially Salafist extremism, in Syria and beyond, because
Moscow has decided that its interests are best served by fighting a war against
growing Islamist extremism and the prospect of it spreading to its territory and
vicinity, including in Chechnya.
But the Russian leadership fears that the U.S.-Saudi accord could lead to
supporting the secular or moderate Syrian opposition, and supplying it with
weapons like Man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) to shoot down
Russian-made airplanes used by the Syrian regime to drop explosive barrels on
civilians. Moscow wants to continue supplying the regime of Bashar al-Assad with
weapons and wants the U.S. to remain hesitant about supplying the Syrian
opposition with advanced weaponry.
The current U.S.-Saudi talks are a source of concern for Moscow and Vladimir
Putin, who is now on alert amid signs of a change in the positions of Barack
Obama on the Syrian issue. But Putin is fully aware that Obama’s attitudes and
sentiments regarding the Ukrainian revolution in 2014 are completely different
from those of his predecessor President George W. Bush regarding the Orange
Revolution also in Ukraine in 2004.
Indeed, Bush had adopted the slogans of freedom, democracy, and the fight
against tyranny as core American values. Obama is averting Bush’s policy and
believes that those slogans are not the concern of the U.S. and that the
American people do not want to get involved in them. Obama is weighed down by
President Bush’s legacy, by the fear of instability, and by his concern of a
clash with Russia over Syria or Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin may decide to build on Obama’s doctrine in foreign policy,
especially as regards Syria and Ukraine. But this will require him to shed some
of his arrogance, intransigence, and excessive nationalistic attitudes at the
expense of others, because Barack Obama will not be able to extend his arms to
embrace Putin’s doctrine in Syria and Ukraine. He is prepared to show so-called
pragmatism in the two issues, opening the door to successive accords and also
grand bargains. But no doubt, this requires Putin to pursue a different approach
on the two crises without necessarily compromising Russian interests.
Putin may choose heavy-handedness and revenge for being placed in an “Olympic
corner” to pass a resolution forcing the Syrian government to facilitate the
passage of aid across he border, and for being put in a Ukrainian corner by
overthrowing his suzerainty over a regime toppled by Kiev’s Independence Square.
Ukraine under Russia’s tutelage almost resembles Lebanon under Syrian tutelage
before the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, which immediately followed the Orange
Revolution in Ukraine. Putin sees Ukraine as a natural extension of Russia, and
he controls keys to either accelerate Ukraine’s economic collapse, rendering it
a bankrupt nation in every sense of the word, or to save Ukraine from bankruptcy
and partition.
Even Mikhail Gorbachev, former President of the Soviet Union, who recognized the
benefits of capitalism, launched a process of economic liberalization, and
precipitated the collapse of the superpower, sees in Vladimir Putin a hope for
reviving Russian nationalism. Gorbachev, who was the guest of honor at the third
edition of the International Government Communication Forum (IGCF) in Sharjah in
the United Arab Emirates earlier this week, told Al-Hayat that “Putin has worked
hard to restore Russia’s fundamental international role, and I believe that he
achieved many things and must continue….”
What road will Vladimir Putin take on his way to restoring Russia’s
international role? Certainly, Ukraine is essential in this road and so is
Syria. In both cases, Putin’s options are not open-ended; but rather, U.S. and
European attitudes have a great role to play – in addition to the fundamental
role of the people in Ukraine and Syria.
The European Union acted arrogantly last year when it set the condition on
Ukraine to prove itself before lifting a finger to save it from bankruptcy.
Putin intervened and offered a huge aid package, causing the deposed President
Viktor Yanukovich to choose Russia and move away from integration with the
European Union. People revolted against him, and made it clear that they wanted
to be affiliated to the West not the East, angering Moscow which believes that
events in Ukraine are a Western plot to bring Ukraine into NATO.
The uprising in Kiev gave the European Union a second chance, but Europe is
divided and it is dithering. It wants the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to
be a key partner in providing economic aid to Ukraine. Europe also fears Putin’s
economic retribution against Ukraine, if he severs the close Russian-Ukrainian
economic ties.
Putin is biding his time, waiting for European mistakes, divisions, hesitancy,
and fears that prevail in NATO countries. It may be sufficient for him to exact
revenge though economic – rather than military – means.
On the Syrian issue, Putin may find his cards are more limited, especially in
light of indications that there is a new Western-Arab policy in Syria. It may
also prove difficult for him to manage both crises, especially since actors in
both cases are not limited to governments but also peoples and the popular will.
There are prospects for prudence to prevail, and to lead to changes in policies
and adapting with new realities all the way to reaching new understandings. But
there also are prospects for vindictive policies, leading to further
confrontations and miscalculations.
The battles for Kiev and Damascus are caught between prudence and
heavy-handedness, in a polarization that is fateful not only for Ukraine and
Syria, but also for the relationship between Russia and the West. It is a phase
of anxious repositioning.
Translated from Arabic by Karim Traboulsi
Russians strike Ukraine army post in Crimea. Kiev fears
Ukraine army putsch. US warships on standby
DEBKAfile Special Report March 1, 2014/As Moscow’s master plan
for Ukraine continued to unfold, Russian forces Saturday, March 1, staged their
first attack on a Ukraine military installation in Crimea, while completing
their takeover of the region and its severance from Ukraine. Interfax reported
from a Ukrainian source that 20 soldiers had entered an anti-aircraft missile
command post in western Crimea and that negotiations rather than a clash were
under way. Earlier Saturday, Crimea's new pro-Moscow prime minister Serhiy
Aksyonov asked President Vladimir Putin for help in “maintaining peace in the
region,” saying he was in control of the region’s interior ministry, armed
forces, fleet and border guards. The invitation set the scene for Russian
military intervention in Crimea at the request of its government. Moscow said
the appeal would not go “unnoticed," while the Russian foreign ministry declared
itself “extremely concerned” by developments in Crimea – cynically echoing US
President Barack Obama’s expression Friday of “deep concern” about Russian
military movements inside Ukraine and his warning of “costs.” The Crimean
premier, appointed Thursday by parliament in Simferopol, later announced that a
referendum would be held on March 30 to determine the peninsula’s status.
Meanwhile, he said, Russian Black Sea fleet servicemen were guarding important
buildings. In Kiev, interim defense minister Igor Tenyukh, addressing the first
new cabinet’s first meeting, accused Russia of an armed invasion of Ukraine and
pouring an additional 6,000 troops into the peninsula. Western correspondents
reported that Crimea is now cut off from the rest of Ukraine after “unidentified
troops” in combat fatigues, armed with automatic rifles, machine guns or RPGs,
seized control of Crimea’s sea and air ports and its main road network in the
last 24 hours. Interim Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk told the Kiev cabinet
that Ukraine forces were on alert, but he would not be ”drawn into a military
conflict by Russian provocations in the Crimea region.” debkafile’s military
sources report that this announcement was hollow. The 160,000-strong Ukrainian
army is no match for the Russian army’s operational capabilities and fire power,
although it too is equipped with Russian weapons and trained in Russian military
tactics. But above all, it is far from certain that the new authorities in Kiev
control the Ukraine army. No one knows where the loyalties of its officers lie,
whether with the new pro-European regime or the absconding pro-Russian
president, Viktor Yanukovych. This confronts the troubled country with a fresh
peril, a possible army putsch to oust the interim regime set up by the Ukraine
opposition in Kiev, and its replacement with a military government for
containing continuing Russian expansion beyond the borders of Crimea. The former
Independence Square protesters would have no answer to this. Moscow, while
insisting that its military actions were not an invasion but a legal bid to
protect its interests, has also moved to offset any financial assistance the
West may offer Kiev. Russia's energy giant Gazprom bluntly warned Kiev that it
had accumulated a "huge" debt of $1.5 billion for natural gas that needed to be
urgently paid if the supply is to continue.
This is the exact amount of the loan guarantees the US and EU propose to offer
the stony-broke Kiev authorities.
Along with US warnings to Moscow, a high alert was secretly declared Saturday by
the US Mediterranean Sixth Fleet. Two US warships which had been deployed in the
Black Sea to back up Russian security for the Olympic Winter Games in Sochi -
the USS Taylor Frigate and the USS Mount Whitney Blue Ridge-class command ship -
have moved over to the western side of the Black Sea opposite Crimea and facing
the Russian navy base of Sevastopol. The Mount Whitney is outfitted with
sophisticated intelligence-gathering systems. Its current location means that
ongoing Russian military movements across central, southern and western Russia,
around its borders with Ukraine and inside the Crimean peninsula, are being
monitored and beamed to the White House and the Pentagon. Obama’s response is
anyone’s guess. So far, the only hints thrown out are that Western leaders are
planning a boycott of the G8 summit Putin plans to host in Sochi this summer, in
protest against Russia’s takeover of Crimea.
Rouhani: 'Ethical principles' stop Iran from pursuing nukes
Reuters Published: 03.01.14, 10:04 / Ynetnews
Islamic republic's president says if his country wanted WMDs, it would make
chemical, biological weapons.
Iran's president says the Islamic republic rejects the manufacture of nuclear
weapons out of principle, not because it is prevented so by treaties.
Hassan Rouhani also said that, had Iran wanted weapons of mass destruction, it
would be easier for it to make chemical or biological weapons. He made the
comments Saturday while addressing Iran's Defense Ministry officials.
Rouhani said that Iran's "beliefs" and commitment to "ethical principles"
prevent it from making a bomb.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has already issued a religious
decree banning the production and use of nuclear weapons. He says having such
arms is a sin.
The US and its allies fear that Iran seeks to develop the ability to make a
nuclear weapon, should it want one. Iran denies the charge. Earlier in the week,
a Reuters report revealed that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had
shelved a major report on Iran that might have revealed more of its alleged
bomb-relevant research, but held off because of the warming relations between
Iran and the West.
On Friday, Israel urged the UN nuclear watchdog agency to go public with all
information it has regarding suspicions that Iran researched how to build an
atomic bomb. "The role of the IAEA is to expose to the international community
all information regarding military aspects of the Iranian nuclear project, and
not to withhold it for reasons of diplomatic sensitivity," Israeli Strategic
Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz said in a statement.