LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 11/14
Bible Quotation for today/Human Disobedience
Genesis 03/01-24: " Now the snake was the most cunning animal that the Lord God
had made. The snake asked the woman, “Did God really tell you not to eat fruit
from any tree in the garden?” “We may eat the fruit of any tree in the garden,”
the woman answered, “except the tree in the middle of it. God told us not
to eat the fruit of that tree or even touch it; if we do, we will die.” The
snake replied, “That's not true; you will not die. God said that because he
knows that when you eat it, you will be like God and know what is good and what
is bad. The woman saw how beautiful the tree was and how good its fruit would be
to eat, and she thought how wonderful it would be to become wise. So she took
some of the fruit and ate it. Then she gave some to her husband, and he also ate
it. As soon as they had eaten it, they were given understanding and
realized that they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and covered
themselves. That evening they heard the Lord God walking in the garden,
and they hid from him among the trees. But the Lord God called out to the
man, “Where are you?” He answered, “I heard you in the garden; I was afraid and
hid from you, because I was naked.” “Who told you that you were naked?” God
asked. “Did you eat the fruit that I told you not to eat?” The man answered,
“The woman you put here with me gave me the fruit, and I ate it.” The Lord God
asked the woman, “Why did you do this?” She replied, “The snake tricked me into
eating it.”
God Pronounces Judgment
Then the Lord God said to the snake, “You will be punished for this; you alone
of all the animals must bear this curse: From now on you will crawl on your
belly, and you will have to eat dust as long as you live. I will make you
and the woman hate each other; her offspring and yours will always be enemies.
Her offspring will crush your head, and you will bite her offspring's heel.” And
he said to the woman, “I will increase your trouble in pregnancy and your pain
in giving birth. In spite of this, you will still have desire for your husband,
yet you will be subject to him.” And he said to the man, “You listened to your
wife and ate the fruit which I told you not to eat. Because of what you have
done, the ground will be under a curse. You will have to work hard all your life
to make it produce enough food for you. It will produce weeds and thorns,
and you will have to eat wild plants. You will have to work hard and sweat to
make the soil produce anything, until you go back to the soil from which you
were formed. You were made from soil, and you will become soil again.”Adam named
his wife Eve, because she was the mother of all human beings. And the Lord
God made clothes out of animal skins for Adam and his wife, and he clothed them.
Adam and Eve Are Sent Out of the Garden
Then the Lord God said, “Now these human beings have become like one of us and
have knowledge of what is good and what is bad. They must not be allowed to take
fruit from the tree that gives life, eat it, and live forever.” So the
Lord God sent them out of the Garden of Eden and made them cultivate the soil
from which they had been formed. Then at the east side of the garden he
put living creatures and a flaming sword which turned in all directions. This
was to keep anyone from coming near the tree that gives life.
Pope Francis
Let us pray for all good and faithful priests who dedicate themselves to their people with generosity and unknown sacrifices.
Pape François
Prions pour tous les prêtres bons et fidèles qui se dévouent au service de leur peuple avec générosité et sacrifice silencieux.
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources For February 11/14
DEBKAfile/Iran
spreads its war wings: Hizballah deepens role in Syria. Israel, Syria, Lebanon
regions of conflict/February 11/14
Washington finally discovered who’s behind al-Qaeda/By: Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al
Arabyia/February 11/14
Taking bold steps to deliver aid in a broken Syria/By:
Dr. Theodore Karasik/Al Arabyia/February 11/14
Karzai fears the U.S. more than the Taliban/By: Camelia Entekhabi-Fard/Al Arabyia/February 11/14
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources For February 11/14
Lebanese Related News
Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon upbeat (Positive) over birth of all-embracing
Cabinet
Future MPs: Hezbollah reneging (Go Back) on Cabinet deal
Hezbollah says to remain in Syria
IRNA: Hizbullah Dismantled Terrorist Cell Ran by Saudi Intelligence
Hizbullah Calls for Overcoming 'Portfolio Rotation Obstacle', Warns of
'Impending Danger'
Al-Mustaqbal, FPM Officials Deny Hariri-Bassil Meeting
Saniora Accuses FPM, Hizbullah of Hindering Cabinet Formation
Aoun says to help implement Bkirki charter
Bassil Hits Back at Suleiman from Dubai amid Reports of Meeting with Hariri
Defected Syrian Colonel Arrested in Arsal
ISF Seizes 3 Kilos of Hashish Hidden in Washer in Mastita
Miscellaneous Reports And News
Iranian admiral: The US can expect heavy losses at sea should it attack Iran
International security expert to ‘Post’: Iran’s nuclear research might be
legally protected
Iranian Simulation: Missiles on Tel Aviv's largest plaza
Iran Says Will not Negotiate Missile Program
IAEA says Iran detonators deal only a ‘first step’
Maalula Nuns Appear in New Al-Jazeera Video
Rebel attack on Syrian Alawite village kills 40
Islamist Rebels Oust ISIL from Syria's Deir Ezzor
France Says will Propose U.N. Resolution on Syria Aid Corridors
Syrian rivals resume peace talks in Geneva
Iran
spreads its war wings: Hizballah deepens role in Syria. Israel, Syria, Lebanon
“regions of conflict”
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report February 10, 2014
http://www.debka.com/article/23666/Iran-spreads-its-war-wings-Hizballah-deepens-role-in-Syria-Israel-Syria-Lebanon-%E2%80%9Cregions-of-conflict%E2%80%9D
In a fundamental policy makeover, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC)
high command has resolved to deepen the Lebanese Hizballah’s intervention in the
Syrian civil war, with wide repercussions on the stability of Lebanon and the
Syrian and Lebanese borders with Israel. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the
IRGC’s terrorist and intelligence arm, the Al Qods Brigades, was appointed to
execute this policy of expanded regional intervention. DEBKAfile’s military and
intelligence sources report that it embodies the latest decision by Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to strictly separate Tehran’s approach to
international nuclear diplomacy opposite the US from its intervention in
regional conflicts – Syria, Lebanon and the Palestinians – and direct
confrontation with Israel. Henceforth, Iran’s tactics in nuclear diplomacy for
the relief of sanctions, and in the negotiations resuming in Geneva, Monday,
Feb. 10 for ending the Syria war, will be sealed off in a separate policy
compartment from the Islamic Republic’s pursuit of its regional goals in the
“war arenas” of Syria, Lebanon and Israel. Syrian President Bashar Assad and
Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah were notified of this change last week. It
first surfaced in a call to arms by Hizballah’s second in command Sheikh Naim
Qassem, which is reported to have drawn 5,000 new Shiite volunteers in its first
push. The new intake will receive military training in crash courses for
missions in Lebanon and a higher level of combat instruction for the Syrian
battlefield.
Qassem announced in a pep speech in Beirut: "We will continue our work and
remain in the field committed to our political stances. We will remain fighting
where we are fighting. We are a resistance wherever we are: a resistance against
Israel and its agents and a resistance fighting in Syria in defense of the
resistance.”His meaning was clear. The organization would continue fighting in
Syria while buttressing its positions in Lebanon and persevering in its
“resistance against Israel and its agents.”That speech was also meant to raise
the morale of Lebanon’s 3 million Shiites, who are down in the dumps as they
facing bombing attacks by Al Qaeda-linked terrorists in reprisal for Hizballah’s
military support for Bashar Assad, and see their young men (17-25) being called
up for more fighting. “Do not panic or be frightened of them or they will win,”
Sheikh Qassam told them. “Our heads will remain high, as we combat the takfiris
and those behind them. We will be victorious in the end...” One outcome of
Tehran’s new strategy – revealed here for the first time by DEBKAfile’s
intelligence sources - is that the formula Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zerif
worked on during his Beirut visit in mid-January, to resolve Lebanon’s chaotic
political scene, has gone by the board. He managed to bring Lebanon’s quarreling
factions to agree on a national unity government with nine portfolios allotted
to the Hizballah bloc, nine the opposition and six chosen by President Michel
Suleiman. Hizballah was ordered by the hardline al Qods commander to revoke this
deal.
Khamenei’s step to appease his hard-line factions has therefore dashed the hopes
of President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry that nuclear
diplomacy with Iran and sanctions relief would have a positive and stabilizing
effect on other parts of the region. President Hassan Rouhani’s tactics for
getting sanctions eased will not be allowed to interfere with Iran’s ambitions
to foment discord and expand its grip on the rest of the region.
Iranian admiral: The US can expect heavy losses at sea should it attack Iran
By JPOST.COM
STAFF/02/10/2014/The commander of Iran's navy threatens to sink American naval
vessels, cites progressive naval capabilities after sending fleet toward US
shores. warship
The commander of Iran's navy ratcheted up the Islamic Republic's recent rhetoric
against the United States, threatening the Americans with major losses at sea
should they chose to attack Iranian nuclear facilities.“The Americans can fully
expect that their warships [and] aircraft carrier will be sunk with all 5,000
crew aboard, in combat against Iran, and they could find its hulk in the depths
of the sea,” Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy Commander Rear
Admiral Ali Fadavi was quoted as saying by semi-official Iranian Fars News on
Sunday. Fadavi said that since the day that the US warships entered the Persian
Gulf, the IRGC Navy has evolved all its capabilities, training, structures,
organizations and weapons to counter Washington’s threats, and added that the
IRGC vessels in the region are monitoring every move made by the Americans. In a
display of naval power and confidence, an Iranian Navy fleet of warships is
reportedly making its way across the Atlantic Ocean, reported Fars on Sunday. At
the time, they reported that the ships would sail for at least three months.
“Iran’s military fleet is approaching the United States’ maritime borders, and
this move has a message,” Admiral Afshin Rezayee Haddad of Iran’s Northern Navy
Fleet was quoted as saying.Then, Iran’s Navy Commander R.-Adm. Habibollah
Sayyari said the move would counter US presence in its waters in the Persian
Gulf. Hours earlier, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on
Saturday the United States would overthrow the Iranian government if it could,
adding Washington had a “controlling and meddlesome” attitude towards the
Islamic Republic, Iranian media reported. Fadavi said though Americans might be
able to hide themselves in various bases in certain Muslim countries in the
region if they are faced with an Iranian military response, but “they cannot
hide themselves at sea since the entire Middle-East, western Europe, the Persian
Gulf, the Sea of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz are monitored by us and there is
no place for [them] to hide”. Iran's naval power was acknowledged in a
Washington Institute for the Near East Policy report in 2008 on "reviewing the
historical evolution of Iran’s approach to asymmetric warfare and assessing its
naval forces." The report stated, "This study concludes that despite Iran’s
overall defensive posture in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, it could
take preemptive action in response to a perceived threat of imminent attack. And
in the event of a US attack, the scale of Iran’s response would likely be
proportional to the scale of the damage inflicted on Iranian assets."
International security expert to ‘Post’: Iran’s nuclear research might be legally protected
By MICHAEL WILNER/J.Post/
02/10/2014 07:11
Leading expert says ability of int'l community to constrain Iran’s R&D cannot be
guaranteed “with even 90 percent assurance.” Bushehr nuclear Iranian
Iranian security official at Bushehr nuclear plant. Photo: REUTERS
WASHINGTON - Continued research and development on advanced nuclear technology
in Iran might be protected by international law and will be difficult to curtail
in the long term, says a leading independent expert on the Islamic Republic’s
nuclear program.
David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and
International Security, said in an interview with The Jerusalem Post that the
ability of the international community to constrain Iran’s R&D cannot be
guaranteed “with even 90 percent assurance.” Indeed, the UN’s Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty – to which Iran is a signatory – only directs countries
against developing or transferring nuclear weapons or devices, explicitly saying
it should not be interpreted “as affecting the inalienable right of all the
parties to the treaty to develop research.”Albright, quoted extensively by
members of both parties on the Iranian program, testified last week on the
matter in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where he described
the failure to address Iranian R&D as a “loophole” in the interim deal reached
in Geneva in November. The deal effectively freezes Iran’s enrichment of uranium
to near-high grades, and its construction of a plutonium nuclear facility, in
exchange for $7 billion in sanctions relief from world powers. The deal expires
in five months. “The weakness of the interim deal on centrifuge R&D needs to be
fixed in the comprehensive solution,” Albright told the Senate committee. “Any
long-term deal needs to limit significantly Iran’s centrifuge R&D
program.”Albright said Iran’s work on advanced centrifuges may continue
uninhibited for the next five months, allowing Iran to “make up for time lost”
after the interim accord expires. Yet in conversation with the Post, Albright
said it’s a hard needle to thread for reasons both legal and practical. “You
can’t design a verification regime around detecting every scientist,” Albright
said.
“The NPT is a little vague on this, but the modern interpretation is that we can
restrict activity that is state-sponsored.”“States interpret it differently,” he
continued, “but in Switzerland, the sheer possession of tested nuclear-weapons
designs was illegal. The NPT is a living document, and some interpret it more
broadly.”On several occasions, US President Barack Obama has alluded to the
difficulty of limiting any country’s research into any topic already broadly
explored. “I think it’s important for everybody to understand this is hard
because [of] the technology of the nuclear cycle, “ Obama said at the Brookings
Institution’s Saban Forum in December. “You can get it off the Internet; the
knowledge of creating a nuclear weapons is already out there.”
Testifying before the same Senate panel last week as Albright, Wendy Sherman,
the chief US negotiator with Iran in the nuclear talks, noted that Iranian
scientists “cannot unlearn what they know” about nuclear science and
weaponization. US officials now say the priority of the Obama administration is
to physically disable Iran’s ability to build a bomb.
The White House also seeks a strict and long-term verification program, run by
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Sherman reflected that policy in her testimony last week.
Asked about the failure of the interim deal to address Iran’s research into
nuclear weapons delivery systems, the top US diplomat said that the knowledge
would be “almost irrelevant” if Iran is not able to produce a nuclear warhead.
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, told
Sherman he hopes for a verification program that would last several decades.
Contacted for this article, a State Department official said that “R&D is an
important issue for the comprehensive solution,” referring to the talks
beginning next week between Iran and world powers geared to a final-status
nuclear accord. Over the summer, Albright estimated Iran had expanded its
program so significantly that it could have the fissile material required to
build a bomb in less than two months.
“How do you know if a scientist some place is designing a nuclear weapon on a
sheet of paper?” Albright said in the interview.
Senator Mark Kirk (R-Illinois), a strong proponent of passing new sanctions
against Iran, told the Post last week that Iran’s research should be treated as
extraordinary, as it serves as a subterfuge to multiple international
agreements. “Iran’s pursuit of advanced centrifuge technology should remind us
that this terror-sponsoring regime ultimately wants nuclear weapons,” Kirk said.
“There’s a reason why Wendy Sherman’s appeasement policy in North Korea failed –
dictators will always embarrass the American politicians who side with them.”
Sherman led negotiations with North Korea over its illicit nuclear program in
the Clinton administration.
Meanwhile, Iran has agreed to take seven preliminary measures on nuclear
cooperation with the IAEA by May 15, the country said in a joint statement with
the UN nuclear watchdog on Sunday.
In a statement carried by the official IRNA news agency and issued after two
days of “constructive technical talks” in Tehran, Iran and the IAEA did not
spell out the measures, but said full details would be reported to the governors
of the UN agency by the watchdog’s director-general. Reuters contributed to this
report.
Iranian
Simulation: Missiles on Tel Aviv's largest plaza
Ynetnews/02.09.14, 23:41 / Israel News
In video simulating drone attack, aired on Iranian television, Haifa, Tel Aviv
appear to go up in flames. Which other sites does the Iranian bank of targets
include?
Tel Aviv's Kikar Hamedina square, Azrieli towers, and the Panorama Towers in
Haifa: These are just several targets for Iranian AUVs, at least according to a
video shown on television in Teharan over the weekend. The Iranian "smile
offensive" during negotiations with the West on Tehran's nuclear program did not
bring the broadcasting of the inciting clips on local television channels to a
stop.As part of a documentary titled "The Nightmare of Vultures" that was aired
on an Iranian television channel over the weekend, the development of the
Revolutionary Guard's drone industry was presented. The same clip also showed a
computer simulation of an attack on Israel and the US Air Force stationed in the
Persian Gulf with the use of the same UAVs.The bank of targets, according to the
simulation, is extensive. The video begins with the bombing of Kikar Hamedina
square in Tel Aviv, continues with missile strikes on Ben Gurion Airport and
military bases such as The Kirya, (the IDF headquarters) and ends with Tel Aviv
going up in flames. Also in danger, according to the clip, are the Azrieli
towers, Panorama Towers in Haifa and the oil refineries in Haifa bay.The images
are not new. The video presented images of victims of the 2006 Lebanon War, and
Ehud Olmert, Amir Peretz and Dan Halutz, were also shown, although they have not
been in leadership positions for a while.
This isn't the first time that Iran simulated a missile attack on Israel. Three
months ago, the state television aired an hour-long documentary program about
the capabilities of Iranian missiles and the possibility of their use in
response to foreign threats. The program included a video simulation of a
potential response by Iran to an Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities.
Future MPs: Hezbollah reneging (Go Back) on Cabinet deal
February 10, 2014/The Daily Star-
BEIRUT: Future Movement lawmakers Monday accused Hezbollah of reneging on a deal
that would see the formation of an all-embracing government by resorting to
excuses and enlisting its allies in the March 8 alliance to sabotage the birth
of a new Cabinet.
“When a solution on the Energy Ministry began to emerge they came up with the
issue of the security portfolios and when names were proposed they started using
vetoes,” Future Movement Ahmad Fatfat told a local television station. “What
right do [MP Michel] Aoun and Hezbollah think they have to objecting to names
put forward by the Future Movement?” Fatfat asked, noting that “Gen. Aoun and
Hezbollah had said they would be naming their [sides].” Political sources last
week told The Daily Star that the Cabinet formation process, which has been
ongoing for 11 months, was still at an impasse over objections by Hezbollah over
the allotting of two security ministries to the March 14 coalition. In January,
the leader of the Future Movement, former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, paved the
way for the formation of an all-embracing government after saying he would be
willing to share power with Hezbollah in the next Cabinet. “The political
agreement [between Hezbollah and the Future Movement] stipulates the formation
of an 8-8-8 Cabinet with ministry portfolios distributed evenly between the
sects and the comprehensive and continuous rotation of ministerial portfolios,”
Fatfat said. “These are the three main points of the agreement and we are
sticking to them,” Fatfat added. One of the hurdles to the formation is Aoun’s
opposition to the principle of rotating ministerial portfolios which would see
his son-in-law, Gebran Bassil, lose the Energy Ministry portfolio. Hezbollah,
Aoun’s ally in the March 8 coalition, has urged Prime Minister-designate Tammam
Salam to show more flexibility on the issue and warned that a Cabinet without
representation by the Free Patriotic Movement is doomed to fail.
Future Movement MP Mohammad Hajjar alleged Hezbollah was obstructing the
formation, reflecting what he said was a pattern of reneging on agreement by the
Lebanese group.
“We are ready to offer all the possible concessions to reach a solution but the
truth is that we are [going round in circles] because of Hezbollah’s [usual]
backtracking on previous agreements and commitments,” Hajjar told Voice of
Lebanon radio. “Today we are seeing a failure in commitments over the Cabinet
formation .... the excuses are always ready as well as the means but what is
sure is that there is always sectarian incitement that covers and envelops a
lack of willingness by Iran at present to calm the Lebanese arena because of
priorities for Iran’s project in the region,” he said. “Will President [Michel]
Sleiman and Salam exercise their constitutional prerogatives and sign the
decrees for the formation of the Cabinet?” Hajjar asked. “This is what we and
all the Lebanese hope will happen,” he added.
Iran’s
ambassador to Lebanon upbeat (Positive) over birth of all-embracing Cabinet
February 10, 2014/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon Monday voiced optimism on the formation of
an all-embracing government but warned that a failure to do so could jeopardize
the upcoming presidential election. Ghazanfar Roknabadi, during a gathering with
journalists on the eve of the 35th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, also
predicted a rapprochement in the near future between the Islamic Republic and
its regional rival Saudi Arabia.
“We are optimistic on the formation of an all-embracing government soon,” the
Iranian diplomat said. “The dangers that the region will witness are much larger
than this [government crisis],” he said. “We are optimistic and hope that all
[political] sides will reach a deal,” he said. Eleven months have passed since
Prime Minister-designate Tammam Salam was nominated to form the next government.
President Michel Sleiman’s six-year-term ends on May 25. Lebanon enters a
two-month constitutional period on March 25 to prepare for the election of the
next head of state. “If there was no understanding [between political sides] it
will be very difficult to meet any challenges such as forming a government and
electing a president,” he said. While stressing that his government did not
intervene in Lebanon’s Cabinet formation process, he voiced Tehran’s readiness
to “help in any way to end the [political] crisis.” Turning to the recent
suicide bombings outside the Iranian Embassy in Beirut, Roknabadi praised the
work of Lebanese security agencies and said the probe of the deadly attack has
seen progress. “Important results have been produced within a month of the
attack and the [apprehension] of [Jamal] Daftardar and [Omar] Atrash,” he said,
referring to two individuals in the custody of authorities.
Daftardar, a commander of the Al-Qaeda-affiliated group that claimed
responsibility for the Nov. 19 attack on the Embassy, was apprehended by the
Lebanese Army mid-January. Atrash, a Sunni preacher, was arrested and charged
last week over a spate of bombings in Lebanon and attacks against the Army.
Roknabadi said Lebanon’s state security agencies, including Army Intelligence,
the Internal Security Forces and the police’s Information Branch, had all
contributed positively in the probe of the Embassy attack that killed 30 people,
including an Iranian diplomat. He said Iran was also involved in the probe and
was waiting for the final results of the investigation.
The ambassador also spoke about the crisis in Lebanon’s neighbor Syria and
reiterated Tehran’s view on the upcoming presidential election there “We are
with whoever emerges [victorious] from the ballot box in Syria,” he said.
“Imagine the scene in Syria without [President] Bashar [Assad],” he said, noting
the growing number of jihadist groups in the country. “There are rightful
demands by Syrian people but the Syrian people want reform under Assad,” he
said. Roknabadi also said his government had been urged to convince Assad not to
run again for president. “[U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs
Jeffrey] Feltman, during a visit to Iran last summer, asked officials to
convince Assad not to run in the elections. The Iranian officials asked him:
‘What’s the problem if he runs,” to which Feltman responded: ‘If he runs, he
will win the elections,’” he said. Asked to comment on calls for foreign
fighters to leave Syria, Roknabadi said: “If we are thinking of a solution, we
cannot be selective in calling for the withdrawal of all foreign fighters. You
cannot focus on one group only. If Hezbollah alone pulled out, will that solve
the problem?” “The United States must stop financing and arming the armed groups
then foreign fighters should be pulled out,” he said. Speaking in Davos last
month, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Mohammad Zarif called for the withdrawal
of foreign fighters from Syria so that the people could decide their own
futures. Roknabadi also reiterated Tehran’s support to Hezbollah, its Lebanese
ally. “ Iran never sacrifices its allies for the sake of interests,” he said,
when asked whether Tehran would abandon Hezbollah as part of any deal between
Iran and the West. “We will not abandon our allies,” he added. The Iranian envoy
also said recent measures by Saudi Arabia suggested a change in Riyadh’s foreign
policy and he predicted a rapprochement was close at hand between Tehran and the
Arab kingdom. “[We are seeing a] start of change in Saudi Arabia’s foreign
policy,” Roknabadi said, citing King Abdullah recent decree punishing Saudi
citizens who fight in conflicts outside the kingdom. “ Iran is keen on the best
of ties with the world, neighboring states, particularly Saudi Arabia,”
Roknabadi said. “Reaching the state of a Saudi-Iranian rapprochement will not be
long,” he said. “God willing, we will reach that stage soon.”“We insist on
strengthening our ties with Saudi Arabia.”
Aoun says
to help implement Bkirki charter
February 09, 2014/The Daily Star/BEIRUT: Free Patriotic Movement
head MP Michel Aoun Sunday voiced support for the National Charter announced by
Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai earlier this week and said his party would work
toward its implementation. "We support the charter and want to assist in its
implementation because it embodies the principles on which Lebanon was
established,” Aoun told reporters in Bkirki after a meeting with Rai. Aoun said
he had discussed the National Charter with the Maronite patriarch and would
address recent political developments during his weekly news conference on
Tuesday. Rai met with Aoun hours before the prelate headed a Mass to commemorate
St. Maroun Day. On Wednesday, Rai announced the National Charter, drafted by the
Maronite Church, describing it as a roadmap for the critical stage that Lebanon
and the region were passing through. In the charter, Rai called on the Lebanese,
particularly officials, to return to the National Pact which guaranteed equal
rights and representation for both Muslims and Christians. He also warned
against foreign meddling and involving Lebanon in foreign war, saying the
country should adopt a policy of neutrality and commit to the Baabda
Declaration. The Charter also spoke about the presidential election, urging
officials to hold the polls on time and consider revising the Taef Accord to
increase the prerogative of the head of state. Rai also said the state’s
security agencies needed to have the exclusive right to the use force.
Bassil
Hits Back at Suleiman from Dubai amid Reports of Meeting with Hariri
Naharnet/Caretaker Energy and Water Minister Jebran Bassil on
Sunday responded to remarks voiced by President Michel Suleiman about the issue
of ministerial portfolios, as a media report said the minister met with former
Premier Saad Hariri in Dubai. “Whether you understand us or misunderstand us, we
are exerting efforts to make Lebanon bigger and more important than a
ministerial portfolio,” Bassil said in remarks from Dubai to the Sawt el-Mada
radio station, which is affiliated with the minister's Free Patriotic Movement.
Meanwhile, NBN television said Bassil held a meeting in Dubai with ex-PM Hariri.
“Is clinging to a certain minister, precondition or portfolio more important
than clinging to Lebanon?” Suleiman asked rhetorically in remarks voiced earlier
on Sunday. On Friday, al-Joumhouria newspaper reported that Hariri had
telephoned FPM leader MP Michel Aoun, noting that “none of the parties has
agreed to confirm or deny the phone call, although sources concerned have
affirmed that the talks were positive and contributed to easing tensions.”The
stalled cabinet formation process faced a new hurdle after Aoun rejected the
rotation of portfolios among sects and political parties and insisted on keeping
the energy portfolio with Bassil, his son-in-law. A rumor about an alleged
meeting between Aoun and Hariri in Rome has been running for over a month, as
both parties refuse to deny or confirm the report. Aoun himself refused to
confirm or deny the news during an interview on al-Mayadeen TV on January 31.
Saniora
Accuses FPM, Hizbullah of Hindering Cabinet Formation
Naharnet /Head of al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc MP Fouad
Saniora accused on Monday the Free Patriotic Movement of impeding the government
formation with the help of Hizbullah, stressing that the two sides backed down
on their commitments. “All parties agreed to facilitate the formation of the
cabinet, however, now some sides are obstructing the matter and imposing
condition,” Saniora said in comments published in the Kuwaiti al-Anbaa
newspaper. He pointed out that ministries are not assigned to certain parties
nor names, adding that this matter violates the constitution. The lawmaker
stressed that those who reject the concept of rotating portfolios toppled al-Mustaqbal
chief Saad Hariri's initiative to share power with Hizbullah in an attempt to
end a ten-month political deadlock. He lashed out at the FPM, noting that “the
party agreed on the formation of an all-embracing cabinet but backed down.”
Saniora urged President Michel Suleiman and Prime Minister-designate Tammam
Salam to take a final decision and form a cabinet. “If a de-facto cabinet was
formed then we'll see the developments from that point,” he added. Salam, a
67-year-old moderate, was appointed in April two weeks after the resignation of
Premier Najib Miqati. However, Salam has been facing a difficulty in forming his
cabinet over FPM Chief MP Michel Aoun's unswerving stance to retain the energy
and telecommunications ministries and his rejection to adopt the concept of
rotating ministerial portfolios. Aoun has rejected the rotation of portfolios as
part of a deal struck between the rival parties on the 24-member cabinet based
on the 8-8-8 formula, hinting that he would pull his ministers out of it and
drawing the support of his allies in the March 8 alliance.
Hizbullah
Calls for Overcoming 'Portfolio Rotation Obstacle', Warns of 'Impending Danger'
Naharnet /Hizbullah on Sunday called for overcoming the
controversial issue of portfolio rotation which is delaying the formation of the
new cabinet, noting that “some parties had deliberately created obstacles with
the aim of targeting a party that represents the majority of Christians.” “Why
is there no agreement on an inclusive cabinet that represents all Lebanese
according to their political and parliamentary weights and why should we keep
spinning in an endless loop over the obstacle of portfolio rotation?” head of
Hizbullah's juristic committee Sheikh Mohammed Yazbek said during a memorial
service in Baalbek. “Is portfolio rotation bigger than Lebanon and bigger than
the impending danger that is surrounding it? Can't we overcome the obstacle of
this portfolio rotation? Is there a hidden objective to push Lebanon to vacuum?”
Yazbek wondered. He warned all Lebanese that "the impending danger" will only
"lead to tragedies and will not spare anyone." "Let no one have the illusion
that they can remain neutralized," Yazbek said, calling on the Lebanese to
"unite and start confronting this terrorism and support the army and security
forces in preserving security." The stalled cabinet formation process faced a
new hurdle after Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun rejected the
rotation of ministerial portfolios among sects and political parties, drawing
solidarity from his allies in the Hizbullah-led camp, who have threatened to
resign en masse from any so-called fait accompli government. Meanwhile, Sheikh
Nabil Qaouq, the deputy head of Hizbullah's Executive Council, said Sunday that
“the problem does not lie in the shares of Hizbullah and the Amal Movement in
the cabinet, but rather in the fact that some parties had deliberately created
obstacles with the aim of targeting a party that represents the majority of
Christians.” “The core of the problem is that some parties do not believe in
real partnership and are renouncing it,” Qaouq added, cautioning that “a
divisive cabinet will deepen the problem and further threaten the fragile
stability.”
IRNA:
Hizbullah Dismantled Terrorist Cell Ran by Saudi Intelligence
Naharnet/Hizbullah has dismantled a dormant cell of The Islamic
State of Iraq and the Levant ran by Saudi spies in its stronghold in Beirut's
southern suburbs, Iran's official IRNA news agency reported. IRNA quoted
security sources as saying on Sunday that the network is led by the Saudi
intelligence under the cover of businesses carried out by Syrian and Lebanese
traders. Hizbullah has remained silent but informed sources told the agency that
the party grew suspicious and put under its surveillance two croissant selling
shops in the districts of Haret Hreik and Bir al-Abed. They said the Saudi
intelligence had bought a franchise to manage the shops and allow ISIL
terrorists from infiltrating Beirut's southern suburbs. Hizbullah “did not
arrest the terrorists” but handed the Lebanese army the documents proving their
operations, the sources told IRNA. The army, in its turn, followed the issue up
with the judicial authorities and arrested the suspects, they added. A series of
bombings have targeted Hizbullah strongholds in Lebanon as the party's
participation in the Syrian war exacerbates sectarian tensions at home.
Sunni extremist groups have claimed responsibility for the relentless series of
attacks on the Shiite parts of Lebanon. They say it is in retaliation for
Hizbullah sending its fighters into Syria's civil war to support forces of
President Bashar Assad against the mainly Sunni rebels seeking to topple him.
Al-Mustaqbal, FPM Officials Deny Hariri-Bassil Meeting
Naharnet/Officials close to al-Mustaqbal movement leader ex-PM
Saad Hariri and caretaker Energy Minister Jebran Bassil have denied that any
meeting has taken place between them in Dubai. The officials, who were not
identified, told LBCI TV network on Sunday night that no such meeting was held
between Hariri and Bassil. Voice of Lebanon radio (93.3) said that Hariri is
currently in Riyadh and not Dubai.
The denial came after NBN said on Sunday that Hariri and Bassil discussed the
cabinet deadlock in the emirate. Bassil did not confirm or deny the report but
he responded to remarks made by President Michel Suleiman about the dispute on
ministerial portfolios in the new government. “Whether you understand us or
misunderstand us, we are exerting efforts to make Lebanon bigger and more
important than a ministerial portfolio,” Bassil said his in remarks from Dubai
to the Sawt el-Mada radio station, which is affiliated with the minister's Free
Patriotic Movement. “Is clinging to a certain minister, precondition or
portfolio more important than clinging to Lebanon?” Suleiman asked rhetorically
in remarks voiced earlier on Sunday. FPM chief Michel Aoun has been accused of
hindering the formation of the new cabinet over his rejection of the rotation of
portfolios and his insistence to hold onto the energy ministry, which is led by
his son-in-law Bassil.
Judge
Saqr Charges Roumieh Corruption Suspects
Naharnet /State Commissioner to the Military Court Judge Saqr
Saqr charged on Monday several officials with corruption, negligence and
embezzlement of public funds regarding the case of renovating Roumieh prison.
According to state-run National News Agency, Saqr charged two ISF officers,
several employees and a contractor with the previous charges. They were referred
to First Military Investigation Judge Riyad Abu Ghida for further
investigations. Financial Prosecutor Judge Ali Ibrahim referred the suspects
last week to the military judiciary. Roumieh, the oldest and largest of
Lebanon's overcrowded prisons, has witnessed sporadic prison breaks in recent
years and escalating riots over the past months as inmates living in poor
conditions demand better treatment.
Maalula
Nuns Appear in New Al-Jazeera Video
Naharnet/A group of nuns from the historic Christian-majority town of Maalula in
Syria appeared in a new video broadcast by the Qatar-based satellite news
channel Al-Jazeera on Sunday. The women are reportedly 12 nuns from a Greek
Orthodox convent of Mar Takla in Maalula who were taken by gunmen in early
December. Al-Jazeera said the video it broadcast on Sunday was recorded on
February 5. They appeared in the recording without audio, but a commentator said
"they say they are in good health, haven't been mistreated... and they are
waiting for their release to return to the convent." The report gave no
indication of where the nuns were being held, but said that they were "Syrian
and Lebanese" and had been "kidnapped." On December 6, the station broadcast a
short video of the nuns in which they denied they had been kidnapped. They were
reported missing from the town north of Damascus after rebel forces, including
jihadists, seized control of Maalula in early December. Religious officials said
12 nuns and three maids had gone missing from the convent, although one of the
nuns in the video said they were 13 nuns and 3 "civilians." Media close to the
Syrian regime had accused rebels of using the nuns as human shields, and fears
were expressed for their safety. In the latest footage, the nuns "thank all
those who are seeking to obtain their release and call for the release of all
prisoners," Al-Jazeera reported them as saying. It said "the kidnappers are
demanding the release of women held in Syrian prisons to set the nuns free,"
without elaborating.
Maalula, a picturesque village cut into the cliffs some 55 kilometers (35 miles)
from Damascus, has long been a symbol of the ancient Christian presence in
Syria. Its residents are some of the few left in the world who speak Aramaic,
the language Jesus Christ is believed to have spoken.
Iran Says
Will not Negotiate Missile Program
Naharnet/Iran's ballistic missile program will not be discussed
in nuclear negotiations with world powers, the deputy foreign minister said in
statements published Monday. The remarks by Abbas Araqchi, who is also Iran's
lead negotiator in talks with world powers, came a week before negotiations were
to resume on a comprehensive accord over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. "Iran's
defense-related issues are not up for negotiations," Araqchi said, according to
media reports. "We will not discuss any issue other than the nuclear dossier in
the negotiations," he added. U.S. lead negotiator in the talks, Wendy Sherman,
last week told a Senate hearing that Iran's ballistic missile program would be
addressed in the comprehensive deal. "The defense-related issues are a red line
for Iran. We will not allow such issues to be discussed in future talks," said
Araqchi. Western nations and Israel have long suspected Iran of covertly
pursuing nuclear weapons alongside its civilian program, allegations denied by
Tehran. Tehran insists its program -- boasting long-range missiles with a
maximum range of 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles), enough to reach Israel -- is an
integral part of its defense doctrine. It also denies ever seeking atomic
weapons, saying its nuclear activities are for peaceful medical and energy
purposes.
Iran struck an interim nuclear deal with world powers in November under which it
agreed to roll back parts of its nuclear work in exchange for the release of
billions of dollars in frozen assets and limited relief from crippling
sanctions. Talks on a comprehensive nuclear agreement are due to resume on
February 18 in Vienna. Source/Agence France Presse
IAEA says
Iran detonators deal only a ‘first step’
By Staff writer | Al Arabiya News/Monday, 10 February 2014
Iran’s promise to clarify its use of detonators marks only an initial step by
Tehran to address long-standing allegations of past nuclear weapons research,
the U.N. atomic watchdog said Monday. “This is the first step that is taking
place now,” International Atomic Energy Agency chief inspector Tero Varjoranta
told reporters at Vienna airport after returning from Iran. “There is still a
lot of outstanding issues so now we are starting on the PMD,” he said, referring
to alleged “possible military dimensions” of Iran’s nuclear activities, mostly
before 2003. On Sunday, the Islamic Republic agreed on seven “practical steps”
with the IAEA in talks seeking further safeguards to enhance transparency on
Tehran’s nuclear drive, an Iranian nuclear official said. The plan included a
pledge by Iran to provide “information and explanations for the Agency to assess
Iran’s stated need or application for the development of Exploding Bridge Wire
detonators.”These detonators, known as EBW’s, can have “non-nuclear
applications”, noted IAEA said in a November 2011 report, but mostly they are
used in weapons research and therefore Iran’s stated development of them “is a
matter of concern”. The steps are meant to be implemented by May 15, Iran’s
envoy to the Vienna-based body, Reza Najafi, told the ISNA news agency. Iran-IAEA
ties have improved since last year’s election of relatively moderate leader
Hassan Rowhani as president of Iran on a platform to ease the country’s
international isolation. (With AFP and Reuters)
ISF
Seizes 3 Kilos of Hashish Hidden in Washer in Mastita
Naharnet/The Internal Security Forces on Sunday managed to seize three kilograms
of hashish in the Jbeil region. “Members of the Jbeil police station confiscated
in the Jbeil area of Mastita three kilos of hashish,” state-run National News
Agency reported. It said the drugs were hidden inside an obsolete washing
machine that was put on a small truck used in the business of selling scrap
metal. Iraqi citizens A. M. al-Omran, 20, T. A. al-Qassem, 20 and A. Kh. al-Omran,
17, were arrested in connection with the case. Investigations are underway to
determine all the details of the operation, NNA said. (Archive image shows a
quantity of hashish that was seized in Tripoli's al-Bohsas)
Defected
Syrian Colonel Arrested in Arsal
Naharnet/The Lebanese Army on Sunday arrested a defected Syrian
officer in the Bekaa border town of Arsal. “Mahmoud Abbas, a Syrian defected
colonel and member of the Syrian Revolution Military Council, was arrested in
Arsal's Wadi Hmayyed,” state-run National News Agency reported. It said the man
was arrested at a Lebanese Army checkpoint in Wadi Hmayyed. But the army later
announced arresting Syrian nationals Omar Mahmoud Othman and Radwan Mahmoud
Ayyoush in Wadi Hmayyed. “As part of the mission of controlling the land
borders, army forces in the Arsal area of Wadi Hmayyed arrested Syrian nationals
Omar Mahmoud Othman and Radwan Mahmoud Ayyoush for attempting to enter Lebanon
illegally,” the Army Command said in a statement. “The detainees are being
interrogated under the supervision of the relevant judicial authorities,” the
statement added. OTV had earlier reported that one of the men was a defected
colonel and the commander of the jihadist al-Nusra Front in the Syrian region of
Qusayr near Lebanon's border. Amid the Syrian refugee influx Arsal has witnessed
since the eruption of the Syrian crisis in 2011, the Lebanese Army has several
times seized cars loaded with arms and ammunition in the town and its outskirts.
France
Says will Propose U.N. Resolution on Syria Aid Corridors
Naharnet/France said Monday it will propose a U.N. Security
Council resolution demanding the immediate opening of humanitarian corridors to
besieged Syrian cities. Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the resolution
represented an attempt to accelerate moves aimed at delivering urgently-needed
medical and food supplies. "It is absolutely scandalous that we have been
discussing this for some time but the people are still starving," Fabius said.
"That is why, along with other countries, we want to propose a resolution on
these lines," he added. Source/Agence France Presse
Syrian
rivals resume peace talks in Geneva
By Staff writer | Al Arabiya News/Monday, 10 February
2014/Negotiations between the Syrian government and the opposition reconvened on
Monday as the second round of the Geneva II peace talks began. Last month, the
first round of talks ended with no firm agreements from both sides on the deadly
conflict in Syria, although U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi had said that some
"common ground" had been reached and that the “ice was breaking.” Brahimi had
also voiced hope that Russia and the United States would exert greater influence
over the two sides of the Syrian conflict to bridge “quite large” gaps. Both
sides had been trading insults at each other throughout the first round. The
talks come a day after hundreds of people were evacuated from the besieged city
of Homs under a three-day truce. The humanitarian deal for Homs was the first
concrete result of talks launched two weeks ago in Geneva to try to end the
country’s nearly three-year-old civil war that has killed over 136,000 people.
The government insists the talks focus on fighting "terrorism," but the
opposition says that the priority should be the removal of President Bashar
al-Assad. The opposition has insisted that the government commit to the 2012
Geneva I communique, which called for the formation of a transitional
government.
Rebel
attack on Syrian Alawite village kills 40
February 10, 2014/ By Diaa Hadid/Associated Press
BEIRUT: Extremist Islamic rebels who overran a village in central Syria
populated by the Alawite minority have killed at least 40 people, activists said
Monday. Half of the victims in Sunday's attack were civilians, including women,
while the other half were village fighters defending their homes in Maan in the
province of Hama, said the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
Syrian state media described the attack as a "massacre" perpetrated by
terrorists, a term the government uses to describe rebels fighting to topple
President Bashar Assad. Extremist Sunni Islamic fighters have come to dominate
the armed uprising against Assad, who is a member of the Alawite sect, an
offshoot of Shiite Islam. The raid on Maan is likely to bolster efforts by the
government delegation to convey their narrative at the Geneva peace talks that
the three-year uprising to overthrow Assad is dominated by al-Qaida extremists.
The extremists see Alawites as apostates who should be killed. The reports of
the Maan attack came as Syrian government and opposition delegates started a
fresh round of U.N.-brokered peace talks in Geneva. The first face-to-face
meetings adjourned 10 days ago having achieved little beyond getting the warring
sides into the same room. Prospects for common ground appear unlikely as the two
sides continue to disagree on the core issue of Assad's future. Fighting has
escalated since the first round, with violence disrupting food distribution
meant to ease the plight of civilians in the central city of Homs and near
Damascus. In the Maan attack, those slain included 11 men and women from one
extended family, said Rami Abdurrahman of the Observatory. Abdurrahman said the
Islamic fighters overran Maan after Alawite villagers lobbed mortar shells on
the rebels using the nearby roads. There have been heavy clashes for weeks
between hard-line rebels and Assad loyalists in the nearby community of Morek,
Abdurrahman said. Most of the Maan women and children were evacuated before the
rebels stormed in but one family stayed put, said Abdurrahman. A man, his
brother, his wife, their four daughters, three sons and son-in-law were all
killed he said. A video uploaded by the rebels of the Jund al-Aqsa Brigade
showed them waving an al-Qaida flag over the village rooftops as bearded,
grinning men looted homes. The video corresponded with The Associated Press'
reporting of the event. Abdurrahman initially said late Sunday that 25 Alawite
fighters were killed, but revised the figure to 20 on Monday. Syria's state news
agency, which reported the attack late Sunday, said the rebels killed 10 women.
Disparate casualty numbers are common in the immediate aftermath of such large
attacks. Syria's uprising began with largely peace protests against Assad's
government in March 2011 but later descended into an armed uprising and a
full-blown civil war with sectarian overtones. Islamic extremists, including
foreign fighters and Syrian rebels who have taken up hard-line al-Qaida-style
ideologies, have played an increasingly prominent role among the rebel fighters,
dampening the West's support for the rebellion to overthrow Assad. Several of
Syria's many minority groups have backed Assad, fearing for their fate should
extremists come to power. The Alawite residents of Maan were particularly
despised, with activists accusing them of killing residents in the neighboring
Sunni village of Fan al-Shamali in 2012.
Islamist Rebels Oust ISIL from Syria's Deir Ezzor
Naharnet /The jihadist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
withdrew from the eastern Syrian province of Deir Ezzor on Monday after a
three-day battle with Islamist rebels, a monitor said. The Syrian Observatory
for Human Rights said ISIL withdrew from the province, which borders Iraq, after
fighting a coalition of opposition brigades including al-Qaida's Syria affiliate
Al-Nusra Front. ISIL is facing a widespread backlash from an array of rebel
brigades angered by its abuses against civilians and rival opposition fighters.
Though it grew from al-Qaida's onetime Iraqi affiliate, al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri
has distanced his organisation from ISIL and ordered it to return to Iraq.
ISIL's chief has ignored the admonition and continued to engage in clashes with
rebels across opposition-held areas of Syria. Al-Nusra had largely stayed out of
the clashes with ISIL, but the Observatory said it joined around 10 other
brigades in the fight against the jihadist group in Deir Ezzor. The loss of Deir
Ezzor province could be a serious setback for ISIL, as it holds oil reserves and
is a key conduit for the jihadists to receive weapons and fighters from
neighboring Iraq. More than 1,700 people have been killed in the clashes between
rebels and ISIL that began in early January, according to the Observatory.
Source/Agence France Presse
Washington finally discovered who’s behind al-Qaeda
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabyia
10 February/14
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/world/2014/02/10/Washington-finally-discovered-who-s-behind-al-Qaeda.html
The U.S. Treasury dropped a bomb when it announced a series of sanctions against
Iran for its involvement in activities carried out in Syria by al-Qaeda, its
military wing Jabhat al-Nusra and its representative Yassine al-Souri. The U.S.
Treasury exposed how funding by Kuwaiti fools is being delivered to al-Souri in
Iran and transferred on to Syria.
If most Sunni Muslims realized the truth about al-Qaeda and that it is linked to
Iran, it would quickly collapse. What happened to the Islamic State of Iraq and
Syria (ISIS) over the past few weeks in Syria is proof that al-Qaeda could be
toppled in the same way. The ISIS was viewed as a heroic organization in the
eyes of the Sunni extremists due to its fierce fighting against Assad’s forces.
However, it became a loathed organization after the media revealed that it is
being run by the Assad regime and it targets opposition forces by assassinating
them and occupying their territories. Al-Qaeda would lose its ideological
legitimacy and funding if it is proven to be linked to Iran. But is this really
the case?
We decline to imagine that a link could be formed between the terrorist Sunni
al-Qaeda organization and the extremist Shiite Iranian regime. What is ironic is
that during al-Qaeda’s initial years, suspicion and accusations were primarily
directed at Saudi Arabia as it is seen as the representative of Sunni Islam and
the most strict Muslim country in implementing shariah law. Also, Saudi citizen
Osama bin Laden led the al-Qaeda organization.
Arousing suspicion
Suspicion was aroused after 16 Saudis were involved in the Sept. 11 attacks.
Before that, there was a history of links between Saudis and jihadist work in
Afghanistan. In addition to that, some Saudis had been involved in daawa,
propaganda and the collection of donations for jihad activities by al-Qaeda in
the past.
The U.S. mocked our story that Iran is a major party in al-Qaeda’s activities.
The U.S. described such opinions as ridiculous and malicious
Abdulrahman al-Rashed
However, with the passing of time, new events have surprised us with news to the
contrary. During the years in which al-Qaeda was active in Iraq, it seemed
strange that al-Qaeda’s targets were synonymous Iran’s targets against Saudi
Arabia, Yemen, Jordan, the U.S. and Europe! There was information that Iran was
hosting dozens of al-Qaeda members who fled Afghanistan after the Americans
attacked the organization there. The Iranian government did not deny that but it
alleged that Seif al-Adel, bin Laden’s son, and Suleiman Abu Ghaith were in
detention.
In later years, information gleaned from information available via detainees’
testimonies and via monitoring al-Qaeda’s activity and contacts led the region’s
countries to become more convinced that the Iranian and Syrian regimes are
behind a lot of al-Qaeda’s operations.
Mocking our story
The U.S. mocked our story that Iran is a major party in al-Qaeda’s activities.
The U.S. described such opinions as ridiculous and malicious, alleging that we
want to collect our rivals - Iran, Assad and al-Qaeda - in one basket!
The westerners could not grasp the idea that an extremist Sunni group could ally
or work with an extremist Shiite regime. They are right to find this allegation
difficult to understand because it’s tantamount to saying that the U.S. runs and
finances communist groups! Since I have written a lot about this subject - that
is the suspicion relation - I will only repeat that in our region, it’s very
important to be open-minded towards all possibilities. The Syrian and the
Iranian regimes used Islamic Sunni groups, like Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza
and Fatah al-Islam in Lebanon, and they also supported opposition Sunni groups
in the Gulf. This is the reality in the Middle East, despite the contradiction
between the aims and the means. The U.S. Treasury’s decisions, with their
interesting details, are not just boycott lists and financial sanctions but an
important condemnation of al-Qaeda. Such decisions must be the first step
towards correcting the path of war against terrorism.
This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on Feb. 10, 2014.
Taking bold steps to deliver aid in a broken Syria
Monday, 10 February 2014
By: Dr. Theodore Karasik/Al Arabyia
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2014/02/10/Taking-bold-steps-to-deliver-aid-in-a-broken-Syria.html
The Geneva II peace talks ended just a week ago with no major political
breakthrough. Participants, if they showed up, continued to bicker. The first
round of talks in the Geneva II meeting ended on Jan. 31 without a concrete
strategy on ending the violence, an agreement on a political transition or an
agreement to ensure humanitarian aid.
Nevertheless, a small, yet important, agreement was reached—outside of the
Geneva II process- based on humanitarian necessity: an international aid
operation to bring food and medicine to thousands of Syrians plus the
requirement to evacuate civilians trapped in Homs over three days was heralded
as a step in the right direction. The point here is that despite the fact Syrian
representatives were sidelined due to infighting, the international community -
led by the international aid organizations spearheaded by the United Nations,
under the courage of U.N. Humanitarian chief Valerie Amos - took a necessary and
risky step to mitigate outbreaks of death, disease, and starvation in the
fractured and broken state. Of course, a three-day humanitarian pause agreed
between the parties to the Syrian conflict was broken almost immediately,
illustrating sharply the chaos on the ground.
Not an easy matter
Humanitarian operations in a warzone are not an easy matter. The logistics and
risks to all parties are, let’s face it, dangerous and ultimately may be deadly.
The shrinking humanitarian space of neutrality no longer exists in today’s
conflicts, especially in Syria. Immediately, nine Red Crescent and U.N. vehicles
convoy came under fire in Homs threatening the lives of U.N. aid workers as well
as the Syrian Arab Red Crescent. Attacks damaged two trucks but the team managed
to deliver 250 parcels and 190 hygiene kits and chronic disease medicines. This
delivery is an important first step but barely scratches the surface of the most
serious humanitarian crisis in recent years, far out pacing those in Africa and
other parts of the world from man-made, inflicted, warfare. To be sure, the
first attempts to deliver humanitarian supplies to the Palestinian district of
Yarmouk in south Damascus were suspended after clashes.
The multi-layered Syrian battlefield sees the deliverers of humanitarian aid as
belonging to, or associated with, a party to the conflict.
Dr. Theodore Karasik
The situation in Syria is dangerous for aid workers. Just as in other warzones
where humanitarian operations occur, major problems erupt. Primarily, the
multi-layered Syrian battlefield sees the deliverers of humanitarian aid as
belonging to, or associated with, a party to the conflict. Syrian “opposition”
or “fighters” see humanitarian aid as an opportunity to re-supply themselves
with food and medicines. Syrian factions are likely to raid current and future
convoys to restock their own clandestine clinics and first aid stations plus
replenish their food stocks if need be. If the aid and food is not required,
then those materials will enter into the black market, where profit can be made
plus the rebranding of supplies could occur to win the hearts of minds of the
potential receivers. We have seen this type of activity throughout Middle
Eastern conflicts for decades, in Chechnya, and even in Latin America. Solutions
are tough to manage and multiple actors can manipulate the situation for
political advantage. In fact, one could argue that the insurgent and terrorist
goal in Syria is to disrupt and delegitimize the stabilization attempts around
local populations. Thus, humanitarians and their operations are a candid threat
and authentic targets. If true, even the Assad government will take advantage of
the situation—from both angles—looking angelic and helpful versus bombing and
killing those enemies of the state that are flushed out of their hiding places
in search for medicine and food.
Hands full
Today, a fresh round of talks begins in Geneva on humanitarian aid issues.
U.N.-Arab League Special Envoy Lakhdar Brahimi has his hands full. He is
relentlessly trying to find a solution to the ongoing, expanding, Syrian crisis.
But let’s be honest, this effort is not a Geneva III or even a Geneva II, but
instead a valiant attempt by state actors and international organizations to
stop the suffering outside of the Geneva I and II process by building on the
humanitarian requirements as a launching point for cooperation.
Nevertheless, there are key stumbling blocks. The usual suspects are refusing to
back today’s meeting because of politics selfishness. The National Coordination
Body for Democratic Change, and the Syrian National Council, a coalition of
Syrian opposition groups based in Istanbul, said they would not participate.
Most of the rebel groups fighting inside Syria, including Islamic Front and the
Syrian Revolutionaries’ Front, have refused to support the talks. These facts
all create doubt over the National Coalition’s ability to hold various armed
parties to a ceasefire for humanitarian deliveries, which has already been
broken. Nobody expects the warring sides, which are protracted and fragmented,
to help humanitarian aid into Syria; instead, they will only hinder the process
for themselves and for political gain. There may be progress on aid programs to
the most needy in Syria, but the aid only touches the tip of the iceberg—if the
aid reaches its intended victims intact.
**Dr. Theodore Karasik is the Director of Research and Consultancy at the
Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis (INEGMA) in Dubai, UAE. He is
also a Lecturer at University of Wollongong Dubai. Dr. Karasik received his Ph.D
in History from the University of California Los Angles.
Karzai fears the U.S. more than the Taliban
Monday, 10 February 2014
By: Camelia Entekhabi-Fard/Al Arabyia
As Afghan President Hamid Karzai makes efforts to hold peace talks with the
Taliban and as he stalls signing the security agreement with the United States,
the Taliban remains busy obstructing presidential campaigns and planning further
attacks. The advertising campaign for the presidential elections began last
Saturday when Taliban members killed two elections workers in Herat.
As usual for the rebels - that is the Taliban in Afghanistan - the elections are
considered the perfect opportunity to target people.
President Karzai, who was unknown until 2001, suddenly became president thanks
to his friend Zalmay Khalilzad who holds Afghani and American citizenship and
who represented Bush’s administration in post-Taliban Afghanistan. In the
meantime, the man, who was considered a good friend of the Americans and
particularly of former President George W. Bush, became the man who represents
the biggest problem for the Obama administration.
Secret talks
Last week, the New York Times reported on Karzai’s secret talks with the Taliban
before the meeting of the Loya Jirga (Afghanistan’s tribal elders) in Kabul in
November. Afghan tribes leaders and individuals who influence tribes agreed to
sign the security agreement with the United States. As usual for the rebels -
that is the Taliban in Afghanistan - the elections are considered the perfect
opportunity to target people
The surprise was that after all the time the Loya Jirga spent and after all the
calls that the president sign the security agreement before the final date of
foreign forces’ departure, President Karzai refused to sign.
Karzai thinks that the U.S. must satisfy “the angry brothers from the Taliban”
before signing the security agreement. It seems the president himself
participated in direct secret talks with them over the past few months.
Even though prominent members of the Taliban refuse Karzai’s calls to engage in
peace talks, they are happy that Karzai rejects the signing of the security
agreement and that he’s taken a stance against the Americans.
There’s a possibility that less influential Taliban-linked have engaged in talks
with the president. Over the past few weeks, Karzai released hundreds of the
most dangerous Taliban prisoners from Bagram prison despite protests. When
talking about those extremely dangerous prisoners, Karzai said they are innocent
Afghans who were tortured by the Americans to become hostile against their state
and become rebels. In the meantime, Karzai, who escaped six assassination
attempts, fears the Americans a lot more than he fears Taliban!
Delusional?
The president may be suffering from illusions according to people close to him.
One of his aides secretly and unofficially told me that the president has lately
suffered from the illusion of seeing American fighting jets pursuing his plane
to bring it down. In the meantime, the entire country silently speaks about the
president’s disease and illusions. Perhaps the Taliban benefits from Karzai’s
enthusiasm about the peace talks in order to guarantee the release of its
prisoners and dispel hopes of sealing a peace agreement with the U.S. Just as
the world awaits the elections to see who the next president will be, the
Taliban too hopes to control the country after the elections amidst the absence
of foreign forces. Since cooperation with the current president is difficult at
this time, it seems the U.S. has postponed talking about all issues - including
the forces’ withdrawal and the signing of the security agreement - until after
the elections in April. Since Karzai is not allowed to run for a third
presidential term - as per the constitution - it’s difficult to trust the ballot
boxes regarding the 11 candidates running for presidential elections in a
country where corruption and fraud is rampant. When looking at the list of
presidential candidates, we find that the president’ s brother - who owns an
Afghani restaurant in Baltimore - is among them. A famous military leader from
the south, who probably can’t read or write, and a bearded extremist Islamist,
who previously invited Osama bin Laden to visit Afghanistan, are among the
candidates.
Abdullah Abdullah, the former member of the northern alliance who came in second
in the 2009 elections is once again running for the elections.
Voters
Estimations indicate that from
among the total number of voters, which is 12 million, there are only 3.5
million eligible voters. Since women represent 35 percent of the total number of
voters, we must expect that they will play a decisive role in case the elections
are held without fraud. So far, the major questions are related to providing
security for the April 6 elections. Besides the security issue, the lack of
trust between Karzai and the Americans casts a shadow on the election.
This article was first published in Asharq al-Awsat on Feb. 8, 2014.
**Camelia Entekhabi-Fard is a journalist, news commentator and writer who grew
up during the Iranian Revolution and wrote for leading reformist newspapers. She
is also the author of Camelia: Save Yourself by Telling the Truth - A Memoir of
Iran. She lives in New York City and Dubai. She can be found on Twitter: @CameliaFard