LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 03/14
Bible Quotation for today/We God's Children
Galatians 04/01-07"But now to continue—the son who will receive his
father's property is treated just like a slave while he is young, even though he
really owns everything. While he is young, there are men who take care of him
and manage his affairs until the time set by his father. In the same way, we too
were slaves of the ruling spirits of the universe before we reached spiritual
maturity. But when the right time finally came, God sent his own Son. He came as
the son of a human mother and lived under the Jewish Law, to redeem those who
were under the Law, so that we might become God's children.
To show that you are his children, God sent the Spirit of his Son into our
hearts, the Spirit who cries out, “Father, my Father.” So then, you are no
longer a slave but a child. And since you are his child, God will give you all
that he has for his children."
Question: "Is gluttony a sin? What does the Bible say about overeating?"
GotQuestions.org/Answer: Gluttony seems to be a sin that Christians like to
ignore. We are often quick to label smoking and drinking as sins, but for some
reason gluttony is accepted or at least tolerated. Many of the arguments used
against smoking and drinking, such as health and addiction, apply equally to
overeating. Many believers would not even consider having a glass of wine or
smoking a cigarette but have no qualms about gorging themselves at the dinner
table. This should not be! Proverbs 23:20-21 warns us, “Do not join those who
drink too much wine or gorge themselves on meat, for drunkards and gluttons
become poor, and drowsiness clothes them in rags.” Proverbs 28:7 declares, “He
who keeps the law is a discerning son, but a companion of gluttons disgraces his
father.” Proverbs 23:2 proclaims, “Put a knife to your throat if you are given
to gluttony.” Physical appetites are an analogy of our ability to control
ourselves. If we are unable to control our eating habits, we are probably also
unable to control other habits, such as those of the mind (lust, covetousness,
anger) and unable to keep our mouths from gossip or strife. We are not to let
our appetites control us, but we are to have control over our appetites. (See
Deuteronomy 21:20, Proverbs 23:2, 2 Peter 1:5-7, 2 Timothy 3:1-9, and 2
Corinthians 10:5.) The ability to say “no” to anything in excess—self-control—is
one of the fruits of the Spirit common to all believers (Galatians 5:22).God has
blessed us by filling the earth with foods that are delicious, nutritious, and
pleasurable. We should honor God's creation by enjoying these foods and by
eating them in appropriate quantities. God calls us to control our appetites,
rather than allowing them to control us.
Pope Francis's Tweet For Today
When we do not adore God, we adore something else. Money and power are false
idols which often take the place of God.
Pape François
Quand on n’adore pas Dieu, on se met à adorer d’autres choses. L’argent et le
pouvoir sont des idoles qui prennent souvent la place de Dieu.
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources published on August 03/14
Netanyahu trying to market victory against Hamas/Shimon Shiffer/Ynetnews/August 03/14
Let diplomacy win, because an army can't/Ariana Melamed/Ynetnews/August 03/14
Under Gaza's Shadow, Islamic State Advances/By: Jonathan Spyer/The Jerusalem Post/August 03/14
For Israel, the rules in Gaza have now changed/By: Ron Ben-Yishai/Ynetnews/August/14
Lebanese Related News published on August 03/14
Two Hezbollah fighters, 20 troops killed in Qalamoun
Kahwagi: Army key to Lebanons salvation
LF: Hezbollah, Aoun not Geagea behind paralysis
Militants surround Bekaa Army center
Bou Saab: 'School affidavits' to solve exam crisis
Restrictions impede Lebanon aid to Gaza
Lebanese Army Intelligence Detains 7 Syrians
Infiltrating Shebaa
Jumblat Calls for Dialogue to Confront Terrorism
Syria Troops, Hizbullah Fighters Kill at Least 50
Jihadists in Qalamoun
Derbas Says No Extraordinary Measures to Confront Influx of Mosul's Christians
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on August 03/14
Israel will not attend Gaza truce talks in Cairo, official says
Gaza violence spirals as Israel hunts for
soldier
Israel holds off on attending Gaza truce talks
Kidnapped IDF soldier's unit unearthed tunnel that stretched 2 kilometers into Israel
UN chief Ban condemns Hamas violation of
cease-fire, capture of IDF soldier
Sisi Says Egypt Truce Plan 'Real Chance' to End Gaza
Clashes
Palestinians launch rockets at Tel Aviv area;
Iron Dome intercepts at least 2
Israel: Refugees from Beit Lahiya can return
Human Rights committee to convene over Gaza
U.S. struggles in Middle East with fewer allies and less influence
Question: "Is gluttony a sin? What does the Bible say about overeating?"
King of Saudi Arabia's impassioned plea
New Libya parliament holds first meeting
Derbas Says No Extraordinary Measures
to Confront Influx of Mosul's Christians
Naharnet /Social Affairs Minister Rashid Derbas said on Saturday that the
Lebanese state didn't take any “extraordinary measures” regarding the influx of
Christians from the Iraqi city of Mosul as a the Patriarchs of the Orient are
set to hold a conference in Lebanon on August 7. “The state didn't take any
extraordinary measures regarding the flow of Iraqi Christians to Lebanon as it
considers that their conditions are not similar to the Syrian refugees,” Derbas
said in comments published in the the pan-Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat. However,
the minister revealed that he will tackle the issue on Wednesday during a
meeting with Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq and Health Minister Wael Abou
Faour. He noted that the conditions of the displaced Iraqis are followed up by
NGOs and churches.
Thousands of Christians and other minorities had fled the northern Iraqi city of
Mosul amid last month's jihadist onslaught led by Islamic State insurgents. IS,
which announced the restoration of the caliphate last month by declaring its
sovereignty over land it has seized in Syria and Iraq, has also leveled several
of Mosul's most prominent religious landmarks. According to Asharq al-Awsat, the
Patriarchs of the Orient will hold a conference in Beirut on August 7 to discuss
the situation of Christians in Iraq in particular and the orient in general.
Sources told the daily that discussions are underway between several countries,
including the United States of America, Australia and Canada under the auspices
of the United Nations, over the distribution of the displaced Christians. Mira
Qsarji, head of the media department at the Chaldean Patriarchate in Lebanon,
revealed that at least 50 Christian family arrived in Lebanon since the IS
controlled Mosul. She pointed out that the displaced are currently residing in
the northern Metn area of Bourj Hammoud. “The financial conditions of the Iraqi
refugees seem to be good,” Qsarji said.
Syria Troops, Hizbullah Fighters Kill at Least 50 Jihadists
in Qalamoun
Naharnet /Syrian troops backed by Hizbullah fighters have killed at least 50
jihadists from the Islamic State and al-Nusra Front groups near the border with
Lebanon, a monitor said Saturday. The clashes raged through the night and into
the morning on Saturday in the border region of Qalamun, said the Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights. Among the dead were at least seven pro-regime
fighters, including government soldiers and members of Hizbullah, which backs
Syria's President Bashar Assad. Regime forces recaptured most of the Qalamun
region in April, with many rebel fighters withdrawing from the strategic area or
slipping across the border in Lebanon. But pockets of opposition fighters,
including jihadists, have remained in the mountainous region. Though the Islamic
State and al-Nusra Front both have roots in al-Qaida, IS has formally broken
with the group, while Nusra is its official branch in Syria. Despite ideological
similarities, the two groups are opposed and in conflict with each other in
other parts of Syria, particularly in the north. But in Qalamun, their fighters
battled the regime and Hizbullah forces alongside each other, with support from
some smaller Islamist rebel groups, the Observatory said.
Agence France Presse
Lebanese Army Intelligence Detains 7 Syrians Infiltrating
Shebaa
Naharnet/The Lebanese Army Intelligence apprehended seven Syrian
nationals while trying to infiltrate illegally into Lebanese territories by
evading checkpoints. According to the Central News Agency, the seven Syrians
were trying to enter the southern border town of Shebaa illegally by dodging
army checkpoints that are distributed in nearby areas. A security source told
the news agency that the army intelligence ambushed a group of Syrians, which
included Syrian opposition gunmen. Preliminary investigations revealed that
another group of suspects escaped the ambush while several gunmen retreated. The
sources said that the precautionary measures in the area aim at restricting the
entrance to Lebanon through army checkpoints after thousands of Syrians entered
Lebanon via illegal crossings. The town of Shebaa has seen a massive influx of
refugees.
Jumblat Calls for Dialogue to Confront Terrorism
Naharnet/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat
called on Saturday on the Arab countries to kick off a dialogue with foreign
states to confront terrorism. “Saudi Arabia should lead a dialogue with Iran and
Turkey in order to fight terrorism that is committing crimes in the name of
Islam, displacing Christians from the Iraqi state of Mosul and destroying the
Arab and Islam diversity,” Jumblat told al-Mustaqbal newspaper. He pointed out
that the matter “is dangerous and unacceptable,” which compels “us to reconsider
the origins of the rejected phenomena.”Jumblat also hailed the speech of Saudi
King Abdullah, considering that it “indicates the amount of risks posed by
terrorism.”Abdullah also lashed out at religious extremism, urging "Muslim
leaders and scholars to ... stand up to those trying to hijack Islam and portray
it as a religion of hatred, extremism, and terrorism.""It is a shame and a
disgrace that these terrorists kill, mutilate (dead bodies), and proudly spread
(pictures) in the name of religion," he said. His remarks were an apparent
reference to Islamic State jihadists operating in Iraq and Syria. ISIL has
declared a "caliphate" in areas it controls in the two Arab states, with their
lightning advance in Iraq in June seen as also posing a threat to Saudi Arabia
and Jordan. Saudi Arabia, an ultra-conservative Sunni kingdom and home to
Islam's holiest sites in Mecca and Medina, shares an 814-kilometer (505-mile)
border with Iraq.
Hamas denies knowing captive officer’s
whereabouts, says he may have died. IDF continues to blast Rafah
DEBKAfile Special Report August 2, 2014/Hamas’ military wing issued a statement
early Saturday, Aug. 2, claiming: “We have lost contact with the group of
fighters that took part in the ambush [in which 2 soldiers were killed and 2nd
Lt. Hadar Goldin, 23, went missing in Rafah Friday] and we believe that they
were all killed in the [Israeli] bombardment. Assuming that they managed to
seize the soldier during combat, we assess that he was also killed in the
incident,” the Hamas statement said, clearly trying to get off the hook of
international condemnation and Israeli punishment.
All Friday night until early Saturday, Israeli jets, tanks and heavy artillery
continued to pound parts of Rafah. The Palestinians say they have lost 150 dead,
of whom 70 were killed in Rafah since Friday morning, when their “ambush,” was
mounted 90 minutes after an international ceasefire went into effect.
debkafile’s military sources report on the findings of an inquiry into the Rafah
attack, in which two Givati Brigade officers, Major Benaya Sarel, 26, from
Kiryat Arba and St.-Sgt. Liel Gidoni, 20, from Jerusalem, lost their lives. It
turns out that the plan for the attack was devised in detail by Hamas and most
likely Islamic Jihad for the abduction of an Israeli soldier.
An ambush squad of 10-15 commandos, some wearing large explosive vests, stole
into the Seri district of Rafah early Friday, covered by a group of local
civilians who, upon hearing that a ceasefire had gone into effect at 8 a.m. that
morning, scattered to their homes. The attackers then crept up to the building
where the Givati troops were busy dealing with a tunnel.
At 9:30, two suicide bombers moved in on the Israeli team and blew themselves
up. The rest of the squad grabbed Lt. Goldin. The attack and abduction were
deliberately timed to occur after the 72-hour humanitarian ceasefire announced
by the US and UN went into effect. Friday night, US President Barack Obama said
that to sustain the ceasefire, Hamas must unconditionally release the Israeli
officer who had been seized in the course of the truce, although he admitted to
doubts about the Islamist terrorists “following through” on a ceasefire
agreement. This was a reference to Hamas violations of all five previous truces
in the 25-day armed conflict in Gaza.
Israel’s security and policy-making cabinet ended a long meeting starting Friday
and ending Saturday morning without releasing a statement. The IDF’s mode of
attacks in and around Rafah, a town of some quarter of a million inhabitants,
indicated that they are trying to trap Lt. Goldin’s abductors before they fled
and went to ground, possibly with their captive.
Hamas and Jihad have tried time and again to kidnap Israeli soldiers. This time
they took advantage of the ceasefire to achieve this goal.
The fate of the negotiations, scheduled to be launched between Israeli and
Palestinian delegations in Cairo Friday at the same time as the 72-hour
ceasefire, is up in the air as far as Israel’s intentions are concerned. Israel
held off sending its delegation to Cairo Friday in outrage over the shock Hamas
attack-cum-abduction in Rafah. Whether Netanyahu decides to respond to the US
appeal, and send negotiators to Egypt on Sunday, may depend on the way matters
evolve in the Gaza Strip Saturday, especially if the missing officer is found.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon have still
to reach a decision on whether to order the IDF to expand the harsh punitive
operation devastating Rafah since Friday to other parts of the Gaza Strip. As to
the ceasefire, it is abundantly clear, as President too acknowledged Friday,
that however any talks through Egyptian intermediaries may turn out, and
whatever the parties may sign, Hamas can’t be counted on to follow through. As
the latest ceasefire attempt demonstrated, Islamic terrorists will seize on any
cessation in hostilities for surprise attacks on Israeli soldiers and any
civilian targets within reach, whether by ambush, rockets, or tunnel terror. So
a signed deal if it happens may be a diplomatic breakthrough, but have little
relevance on the field of combat in Gaza.
Under Gaza's Shadow, Islamic State Advances
by Jonathan Spyer/The Jerusalem Post
August 1, 2014
http://www.meforum.org/4765/syria-islamic-state-advances
In recent weeks, far from the attention of the world's media, the Islamic State
in Iraq and Syria (IS, formerly ISIS) has been fighting its enemies and
expanding its borders.
There is mounting evidence that IS has obtained a chemical weapons capacity of
some kind, and has utilized it on at least one occasion during intense combat
against the Kurdish YPG militia in northern Syria. The organization has achieved
signal successes against regime forces in Raqqa and Hasakeh provinces that
culminated in the capture of the Division 17 base, and the subsequent gruesome
execution of over 200 members of the garrison.
There is also clear evidence of Palestinians, specifically Gazans, fighting in
Syria in an organized unit under the IS banner, and of at least one clearly
IS-linked group operating in northern Sinai and in Gaza itself. The overall
picture is one of a vigorous, capable and savagely brutal Islamist entity, but
one which nevertheless has clear limitations on its capabilities.
Lets take a look: Following its lighting capture of Mosul on June 10, many
observers expected the jihadi group to continue to push on into Iraq, and
perhaps make a bid for the capital city, Baghdad.
This has not happened. IS has set about implementing its brutal version of
Shari'a in the city, but has made no serious effort to push further east.
Instead, the movement has integrated the weapons taken in Mosul into its
structures in Syria, and is concentrating its attention on expanding in a
westward and northern direction.
The first IS assault using the new weapons systems was launched against the
Kurdish enclave of Kobani (Ayn al-Arab) adjoining the Syrian-Turkish border.
This area of Kurdish autonomy juts into the IS area of control; it prevents the
movement from using the direct road from Raqqa city, which it controls, to
Jarabulus and Menbij, on the Syrian-Turkish border.
IS has long sought to destroy this enclave. On July 2, it launched renewed
offensives against Kobani from the west and the east. The offensives included
the use of US-made Humvees, captured in Mosul.
It also, according to Kobani Health Minister Nisan Ahmed, used a chemical agent
which killed three Kurdish fighters while leaving their bodies unmarked.
According to Ahmed, a medical team assembled by the Kurdish authorities found
that "burns and white spots on the bodies of the dead indicated the use of
chemicals, which led to death without any visible wounds or external bleeding."
Perwer Janfrosh, a local Kurdish activist, said the attack took place on July
12, in the village of Avdiko in eastern Kobani.
These claims have yet to be examined by international medical bodies. But an
article on the Lebanese Almodon news website (in Arabic) quotes a resident of
Raqqa city who alleges that IS has transported chemical weapons materials from
the Muthanna complex, northwest of Baghdad, which has fallen into its hands. The
source notes that among the materials transported was cyanogen chloride, an
agent whose use might be consistent with the claims made by the Kurdish
officials (which require further investigation).
Despite the introduction of the captured weaponry, however, the IS offensive on
Kobani ran aground following a Kurdish mobilization; the Kobani enclave remains
intact.
IS then turned its attention to the forces of Syrian President Bashar Assad. On
July 24, the movement launched attacks on regime positions in the Raqqa and
Hasakeh provinces, adjoining the western borders of the "Islamic State," and
near Aleppo city.
According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the attacks gained ground
and took a heavy toll on regime soldiers. The Division 17 base fell on July 25.
Most of the garrison managed to escape to the nearby Brigade 23 base, but around
200 remained behind. The Observatory reported that at least 50 of these men were
subsequently decapitated by IS forces. Footage has become available on the
Internet showing severed heads placed on a fence in Raqqa city; according to the
voiceover, the heads belong to soldiers from the Division 17 garrison.
The IS gains against regime forces reflect the movement's desire to clear
Assad's men out of the Euphrates Valley, and incrementally expand their area of
control.
The IS presence is now nudging up against the main Kurdish enclave in Hasakeh
province. But the failure of the regime to make a major effort to defend the
areas in question also likely reflects its priorities.
Assad can afford to cede isolated positions in the remote north and east of
Syria, without these constituting any threat to his survival. His stronghold in
the south and west of Syria is not currently threatened by IS.As far as IS links
to Gaza: An identifiable Gaza contingent named the Sheikh Abu al-Nur al-Maqdisi
Brigade is active with IS forces in northern Syria, and photographic evidence
has emerged of this group's activities. This group is named after a well-known
Salafi sheikh from southern Gaza, killed in an abortive revolt against the Hamas
authorities in 2009.
IS also has an identifiable franchise within Gaza and northern Sinai itself,
according to a prominent researcher of the IS phenomenon, UK-based Aymenn Jawad
al-Tamimi; the name of the group in question is Ansar al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi
Bayt al-Maqdis.
At the moment, these are relatively minor phenomena. Yet Tamimi suggests that
the presence of the Gazan contingent in northern Syria indicates that genuine
contacts with IS exist, and these are not merely enthusiasts seeking to borrow
the symbolism of jihadi success that IS represents. So IS remains on the
advance, and continues to shock with its astonishing brutality. At present, it
has focused its energies back on Syria. Its forces have suffered setbacks
against the determined and well-trained fighters of the YPG – defending an
enclave that the Kurds consider vital for their "Rojava" project.
IS has enjoyed greater successes against regime forces – in the process raising
a big question mark about recent claims by non-IS rebel spokesmen and supporters
that the movement is a puppet of Assad or the Iranians. IS may also have used
chemical weapons. Lastly, the first signs of its appearance on the front against
Israel may be discerned. The recent global media focus on the fighting in Gaza
should not be allowed to obscure potentially far more significant developments
in the broader region. The Islamic State in Iraq and in Syria is on the march.
**Jonathan Spyer is a senior research fellow at the Global Research in
International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and a fellow at the Middle East Forum.
For Israel, the rules in Gaza have now
changed
By: Ron Ben-Yishai/Ynetnews/08.02.14,
Given that Hamas deliberately violated the ceasefire in order to kidnap a
soldier, Israel cannot unilaterally end the fighting now without delivering
Hamas a victory.
Assuming it becomes clear beyond any doubt that Second Lt. Hadar Goldin has
indeed been kidnapped, it would be a development that requires not only the
army, but the government as well, to devise a new policy vis-a-vis the Gaza
Strip.Before dealing with the long-term repercussions, there is the current
phase in which most of the operational and intelligence efforts are devoted to
locating the Givati officer, or at least prevent him being taken out of the
reach of the IDF in the Gaza Strip. Heavy artillery bombardment on the eastern
outskirts of Rafah was aimed at pinning the terrorists in place and preventing
the possibility of them leaving the area with Goldin.
At the same time, efforts are being made to locate the missing soldier and the
force that might have taken him. It is quite clear that the coming days are
critical. After that, the intelligence dwindles and the ability to locate and
free the abducted soldier diminishes. These hours are the golden hours and the
IDF and Shin Bet will do their best to obtain the "golden knowledge" in order to
make sure Israel doesn't have another Gilad Shalit on its hands, or to verify
that the suspected kidnap victim is no longer alive - which makes it easier, no
matter how painful that might be.
Israel fears that the terrorists who kidnapped Goldin are probably already in
hiding. It is also very possible that the kidnappers have not yet made contact
with their commanders, due to the intensive activity of the IDF ground troops,
and it is perhaps for this reason that Hamas has not yet announced that it has
him in its hands. And perhaps, and this is faint hope, the soldier is not in
their hands, but was lost in the massive explosion that preceded the kidnapping
attempt and led to the tragic consequences of Friday. The sole testimony from
Hamas is from the deputy head of the organization's political wing, sitting in
Egypt and claiming that Hamas seized an Israeli soldier in clashes before the
ceasefire.
This is a blatant lie. It was at around 9:30 am that we first heard about an
incident involving Givati troops in a nearby area. As is established, the
ceasefire began at 8 am. Palestinian civilians began to close in on areas where
IDF troops were located, in order to take advantage of the humanitarian
ceasefire to gather possessions, or see what happened to their homes. At this
point, as the civilians began to approach the soldiers, there was an attack on a
Givati force that resulted in the officer's disappearance.
The civilians of Rafah, hit in the bombardment, are truly the victims of Hamas.
They trusted the group's declaration of a ceasefire, took to the streets, and
got caught up in the fighting which was started by Hamas, without anyone warning
them or preparing them in advance.
Prior notice
There are two serious aspects to this incident. Firstly, the pre-planned,
intentional violation of the ceasefire, most likely to finally grant Hamas its
long-sought "image of victory". The group apparently agreed to a ceasefire so
that it could carry out the kidnapping attempt. It is also possible to draw this
conclusion from the fact that Hamas, despite its announcement to the contrary,
had not on Friday morning sent its negotiators to talks in Egypt. The Hamas
leadership apparently knew in advance that the ceasefire would be violated,
because it would be responsible for the violation, and therefore did not bother
to dispatch anyone to Cairo.
The other serious fact is that actual the violation of the ceasefire and the
abduction incident indicates that Hamas has every intention of continuing to
fight. It would be fair to assume that Hamas would now be satisfied with a
bargaining chip, and thus try to return to the process of a political
settlement, or perhaps even seek the release of the prisoners freed as part of
the 2011 Shalit deal and rearrested after the abduction of the Israeli teens in
June. Their re-incarceration was a bitter blow for Hamas.
But Hamas is willing to fight, and Israel cannot allow it to negotiate from a
position of power while probably holding a captive. The conclusion is that the
IDF will have to expand the fighting, at least in the area where Goldin had last
been, with the objective of rescuing him, and with the objective of placing
equal pressure on Hamas and its leadership – initially to provide information
and then to get the officer, if possible.
Three options
The options that lay before the Cabinet have changed abruptly. The option of a
unilateral end to the fighting without a ceasefire agreement is off the table.
Completing the destruction of the tunnels and exiting unilaterally while Hamas
has a captive is a retreat under pressure - in other words, a strategic military
victory for Hamas, even though the tunnels would have been destroyed.
Another option is to continue with forces in same areas of the Gaza Strip, with
ongoing aerial and artillery assaults, until Hamas delivers information about
the soldier. This option is also not recommended, as it leaves troops in the
heart of built-up Palestinian areas, and therefore vulnerable to more kidnapping
attempts.
A third option is movement and rapid fire from ground forces at specific targets
that would put strong pressure on Hamas and the Gazan population. Perhaps a
combination of crushing aerial and artillery attacks and rapid movement by
Armored Corps combat teams may push Hamas off balance.The Cabinet will also have
to decide whether to send the Israeli envoys to continue negotiations in Egypt,
or announce that until Hamas does provides information about the missing soldier
or says definitively that it does not have him, Israel is not willing to enter
any negotiations.
Netanyahu trying to market victory
against Hamas
Shimon Shiffer/Ynetnews
Published: 08.01.14
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4552641,00.html
Op-ed: The prime minister is looking for an exit point from Gaza which will help
him convince the Israeli public that IDF has in fact won.
The government has turned its gaze to Cairo for Egyptian-brokered negotiations
with a Hamas delegation. Isn't it ironic that General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi holds
the key to ending the battle?On the day after we won't forget the dead and the
hundreds of soldiers whose bodies will carry the wounds of the war for years of
rehabilitation which might not end till the end of their lives. We will not
forget and we will not forgive those who knew about the terror tunnels and about
the preparations made by the terror organizations – Hamas and the Islamic Jihad
– which planned to hit us mercilessly without any intention of being impressed
by the thousands of tons of bombs we dropped on Gaza's residents. As terrible as
these things may sound, we must admit that the decision makers were unprepared,
as might have been expected, for determining the objectives of the war and
achieving its basic goals. Officials we've gotten used to hear and listen
to with the required respect provided us with insights of idlers convening in
cafés. Take former President Shimon Peres, for example, who stated Wednesday
that this war has exhausted itself.
Why? Because it has.
Or Southern Command chief Sami Turgeman's statement Wednesday that the army is
making progress towards completing the mission it has been tasked with –
destroying the offensive tunnels.
In fact, one does not need military background to reach the conclusion that
Hamas has its own exit point, and it is completely different from the exit point
of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon, who now
look as if they are begging for a ceasefire. Forget about the Strip's
demilitarization, forget about an end to tunnel digging. Everything we have
experienced in this war will be experienced even more intensely in the future. I
am writing this in great pain. The current round against Hamas will most likely
end like George Aiken, the Republican senator from Vermont, suggested ending the
Vietnam War: Declaring that the US has won and returning the troops home. The
problem is that Gaza is not located thousands of kilometers away from us. It's
hard to imagine that pulling out will end our war with Gaza.In the past few
years we have been told repeatedly that there is no substitute for Netanyahu in
light of his political and security experience. On the backdrop of the serious
rift in our relationship with the United States and the foot-dragging on the
24th day of the war, we should ask ourselves if there is really no alternative.
Let diplomacy win, because an army can't
Ariana Melamed/Ynetnews
Published: 08.01.14
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4552720,00.html
Op-ed: The IDF can destroy every house in Gaza and kill any
terrorist emerging from a tunnel, but in the 21st century war is won in the
negotiating room.
It's clear that the IDF can win the battle technically. Israel has enough planes
and explosives to crush, bomb, destroy and level every house in Gaza along with
its inhabitants, and enough ammunition to kill anyone emerging from any tunnel
from now until eternity. But this is not the way to win the wars of the 21st
century and this is not the way to defeat terror.
Because every casualty will generate 10 people filled with revenge who have
nothing else to look for in this world apart from revenge. And every bombed
tunnel will be replaced with another improvised hole, and those left in the
heart of the destruction will emerge from it, more determined than ever. The
more they were oppressed, the more they grew and spread," we are told, as a
warning sign as well: In the wars of the modern world, oppressed populations
cannot be defeated only by force of weapon.
The last war which ended with a complete surrender of the defeated side was
World War II, and there too the military defeat alone did not create the new
Germany, which is almost completely clean of Nazism ideas. It took international
cooperation and a perennial rehabilitation program for the German population to
complete the victory over the concept of evil.
In the wars that followed, in most of which the United States participated with
extremely excessive force, other things happened. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan
and Iraq, Libya and Somalia – where there was no internationally-backed
diplomatic agreement, thousands of soldiers died in vain, trillions of dollars
were wasted and nothing good happened.
And yes, the US – like Israel – had enough deadly weapons to send the entire
world back to the Stone Age, not just Gaza.
The attempts to eradicate or siege or crush the Gazan terror began in 1971 with
a crazy dream of Ariel Sharon, who was at the time a glorified warrior who filed
Gaza with bulldozers and tanks and killed hundreds of terrorists and uninvolved
people, and they are going on 42 years later without any conceptual change. Only
the fighters have changed. Those who started the work are already turning grey.
Some of those who are still going, too young to die, will eventually die. In the
meantime, more and more civilians will get killed, unless we let diplomacy win.
Now, same as then, neither side will be able to present a victory image. The
winner will be the one who sensibly and quietly, while the army uncovers tunnels
and does what needs to be done, picks up the phone to world leaders and arranges
a humanitarian ceasefire with the support of whoever's support we need, and
later, if the ceasefire is maintained – arranges talks.
Not direct talks and not talks requiring fundamental concessions from Israel, of
course, but just talks in which a vigorous mediator runs from one room to
another – and here and there the sides' representatives sit nervous and jumpy
like cats – and offers the two sides bonuses which are vital for each of them.
For us – calm; for them – reconstruction. For us – a relief from the southern
threat; for them – demilitarization and getting civilian life back on track. Why
should we agree? Because we long to live and we will not be able to endure 10
military funerals a day for long. Because we seek a normal life even when we
don't know what to do anymore to make it happen. And because we can't be alone,
as we are not alone in this world. Whether we like it or not, the world is out
there, and without it and without its support, what shall we do? And why should
they agree in Gaza? Because unlike us, their leaders declare their willingness
to fight to the very last drop of blood, but this willingness is only
declarative. In Gaza, like in Sderot, not only children want to live. In Gaza
they are not allowed to talk: Hamas is maintaining a cruel dictatorship in which
people without civil rights are not allowed to open their mouths in any event.
But like every political organization, Hamas also understand that it cannot
wreak havoc forever, and that it must offer its subjects a carrot in addition to
a stick, otherwise they will rise up to destroy it.
The Hezbollah precedent
And why should the Western world agree to donate money to Hamas and guarantees
to Israel, and even create an international emergency force which will stand
between the rival sides and supervise them as well as the Golan Heights force
has been doing for many years now? Because in countries which are no
longer forced to fight, diplomatic prestige and global power are measured not
only in bleeding victories but in rational agreements. Each of the major world
and regional powers will gladly take part in writing the detailed, technical,
very non-festive agreement which will restore some calm in the region.
But they will violate it, you'll say. That's very possible: That's why the stick
must be as huge and terrifying as the carrot must be sweet and pleasant. At
least like the arrangement with Hezbollah, which has so far – for nearly eight
years – guaranteed that there will be no rocket fire from Lebanon. Apart from a
few amateur missile collectors who went crazy and launched something, Hezbollah
has been holding fire because it's worthwhile for it to hold fire. Not because
we defeated it. You do remember that we didn't defeat Hezbollah? Even eight
years ago, at the beginning of the 21st century, the IDF was incapable of
defeating a terror organization in the north. Even then, what worked in
everyone's favor was a sort of agreement. Not filled with glory, not an image of
a complete surrender and not a victory image either.
Whoever learns anything from experience in the Middle East knows that diplomacy
must be given all the force that an army is not entitled to use. Quietly and
without making any statements to his people who support the battle, Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is sitting wherever he is sitting now and arranging
an agreement. When it's ready, he'll be able to present it as a big victory in
his impressive way.
So let the army do its job, and let Netanyahu and diplomacy win.
Sisi Says Egypt Truce Plan 'Real Chance' to End Gaza
Clashes
Naharnet/President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said on Saturday an
Egyptian truce plan provided a "real chance" to end the Gaza conflict, stressing
the need for its speedy implementation. "The Egyptian proposal is the real
chance to find a solution to the crisis in Gaza and to end the bloodshed," Sisi
told a televised news conference. A Palestinian delegation is expected in Cairo
on Saturday to discuss a truce, a day after a temporary ceasefire collapsed with
Israel and Hamas blaming each other. Agence France Presse