LCCC ENGLISH DAILY
NEWS BULLETIN
March 18/2013
Bible Quotation for today/Last
Instructions
02 Timothy 03/10-17: " But you have followed my teaching, my conduct, and my
purpose in life; you have observed my faith, my patience, my love, my
endurance, my persecutions, and my sufferings. You know all that
happened to me in Antioch, Iconium, and Lystra, the terrible persecutions I
endured! But the Lord rescued me from them all. Everyone who wants to
live a godly life in union with Christ Jesus will be persecuted; and evil
persons and impostors will keep on going from bad to worse, deceiving others
and being deceived themselves. But as for you, continue in the truths that
you were taught and firmly believe. You know who your teachers were, and you
remember that ever since you were a child, you have known the Holy
Scriptures, which are able to give you the wisdom that leads to salvation
through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is inspired by God and is
useful[a] for teaching the truth, rebuking error, correcting faults, and
giving instruction for right living, so that the person who serves God
may be fully qualified and equipped to do every kind of good deed
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Iran’s Nuclear Program, a Pawn in a US-Russian Deal/By : Huda Al Hussein/Alsharq
Alawsat/March 18/13
Lebanese Jew: 'We want an MP'/By: Carla El Zayed/March 18/13
Latest News Reports
From Miscellaneous Sources for March 18/13
Israel will seek US air strikes to thwart Hezbollah missile transfer
Hezbollah fighter killed in Syria buried in Lebanon
Hezbollah MP slams U.S. ambassador ‘interference’
Lebanon responds to Syria warning
French wish to arm rebels behind Syria’s threat to Lebanon: FSA
Future MP Mouin Merhebi: Iran seeks to control
Jordan, Lebanon playing with fire, Syrian daily says
Beirut on edge after Sheikhs assaulted
March 14 members commemorate 8th anniversary
Tripartite electoral talks in Rome yield no results
Hezbollah MP Ali Fayyad: Security ‘chaos’ poses threat to elections, not
electoral law issue
Lebanon’s National Liberal Party leader MP Dori Chamoun says March 14 still
maintains unity
Controversial Lebanese Sunni Mufti’s transfer of managerial duties ‘symbolic’
Lebanese President Michel Suleiman says parliamentary elections an “internal”
concern
Lebanon’s President Michel Suleiman won’t allow adoption of sectarian electoral
law
Sunni Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir: I have no problem with the army
War in Syria Hurts Lebanese Tourism Sector
French wish to arm rebels behind Syria’s threat to Lebanon: FSA
Hezbollah MP Kamel Rifai denounces “attack” on Lebanon's Mufti
Change and Reform bloc leader MP Michel Aoun holds Miqati responsible for border
violations
Future MP, MP Khaled Zahraman : Syria wants to plunge Lebanon into unrest
Syria’s pro-Assad hackers infiltrate Human Rights Watch Web site and Twitter
feed
High-Ranking Syrian Military Officer Defects
Syria rebels seize security compound near Golan
Ex-army chief Yaalon named Israel's new defense minister
Obama hails new Israel government
How long can Netanyahu’s disparate coalition survive?
UN report reveals Iranian violence against Bahai's
Tripartite electoral talks in Rome
yield no results March 18, 2013/By Wassim Mroueh/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: A meeting between Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister
Najib Mikati and Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai in Rome yielded no breakthroughs
for the deadlocked electoral law to govern elections in June. Also tackling the
thorny issue of the electoral law, President Michel Sleiman said he would not
accept that other countries impose an electoral law in Lebanon. Speaking to
reporters after the meeting, Berri said he was still waiting for consensus to be
reached between rival political groups over a voting system. “I repeat what I
said during the sessions of Parliament’s joint committees. The worst electoral
law that the Lebanese agree on is better than any other law” imposed from
abroad, he said. Asked about his stance regarding the hybrid electoral law the
opposition and the Progressive Socialist Party were currently discussing, Berri
said: “I first proposed a hybrid law to the [parliamentary] subcommittee and
when I found that it was opposed by various groups I said, ‘Let us withdraw the
draft law and wait for an electoral law that draws a consensus from any group
and I will support it.’”
Asked whether he would call for a Parliament session to put the Orthodox
proposal to a vote if rival groups fail to achieve consensus, Berri replied that
he was “very patient.”
Besides Berri, Mikati and Rai, Environment Minister Nazem Khoury also attended
the meeting, which lasted for more than an hour. Berri and Mikati left Beirut
for Rome on a private jet Saturday evening to take part in newly elected Pope
Francis’ inauguration Mass, which will take place Tuesday. Mikati stressed that
the government would remain in place, denying claims he would soon resign.
“We have heard such talk on more than one occasion and some are always banking
on this taking place. But let us be optimistic; the Cabinet will not resign,” he
said. Mikati was responding to a question regarding reports that a Cabinet
session scheduled for Thursday would be the government’s last. The Cabinet is
expected to discuss Thursday the formation of the controversial supervisory
committee to oversee elections.
The move is opposed by the March 8 coalition because, it argues, it would lead
to holding elections based on the 1960 law, which it opposes. But Sleiman argued
that the committee should be established in line with the constitutional
deadline, since no agreement was reached on a new electoral law. Sleiman said
Sunday he did not accept another country imposing an electoral law in Lebanon.
“There is talk that the Americans favor this or that electoral law. I say that
no Lebanese president would accept any state imposing on him its opinion on the
electoral law,” he told a delegation from the Lebanese community in Ghana, a
stop in his one-week visit to four African countries.
Hezbollah said earlier that Mikati and Sleiman had followed U.S. instructions by
signing a decree earlier this month that called for holding parliamentary
elections based on the 1960 law.
Sleiman and Mikati’s decree came hours after U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Maura
Connelly said elections should be held on time regardless of whether a consensus
is reached over the electoral law. Sleiman also reiterated his opposition to the
Orthodox proposal. “I will not accept that during my term [as president] a
sectarian electoral law is endorsed,” he said.
“In the law there is an item stipulating that expats have the right to
participate [in elections]. But if a sectarian law is endorsed, I will ask that
either expats do not vote or assign them MPs that are elected on a nonsectarian
basis ... we will not send sectarian ballot boxes,” Sleiman added. “You should
teach us how to abandon sectarianism,” he said. Sleiman said that the new
electoral law should bring the official voting age from 21 to 18 years and help
encourage the representation of women in Parliament. Health Minister Ali Hasan
Khalil, from Berri’s Amal Movement, said that the March 8 coalition, which has a
majority in the Cabinet, would oppose the formation of the elections supervisory
committee during Thursday’s session. “If President Michel Sleiman proposes this
issue [during Thursday’s] Cabinet session, then we will vote against its
establishment and all sides should respect the results of the vote,” Khalil told
a local TV station. “The elections supervisory committee will not receive enough
votes to be approved and the president should deal with this constitutional path
through institutions and [acknowledge] that the 1960 law no longer exists,”
Khalil said. “Threats of taking certain measures are useless.”
War in Syria Hurts Lebanese Tourism Sector
Paige Kollock/March 17, 2013 /VOA
ALEY, LEBANON — As the war in Syria enters its third year, its economic impact
is being felt by neighboring countries. Lebanon’s tourist industry declined by
as much as 15 percent in 2012.
Visitors from the Persian Gulf states, who makeup approximately a third of
Lebanon’s tourists, but account for about 60 percent of the tourism spending,
have stopped coming. Some are worried about the security situation, others are
boycotting Lebanon for political reasons.The nickname of the once popular
Lebanese mountain town Aley is ‘Arous el Masayif’ - ‘the bride of touristic
places.’ But the picturesque village outside Beirut that once attracted many
Saudis and other Gulf nation nationals for its quaint atmosphere and cool
evening breezes, looks abandoned these days. Many restaurants are empty. Some
have closed down for good. Maher Abou Hassan, the manager of a restaurant in
Aley said, "Before, you needed two to three hours just to get through the main
street of Aley. It used to be packed. Now, look. It’s empty. Most of my
customers used to be from the Gulf. This year, I had only two from there. And
even the Lebanese customers are not coming much."Abou Hassan’s restaurant, “The
Sound of the Oud” - like the streets of his village - also used to be packed,
filling all 200 seats every Saturday night. Now he’s lucky if he gets 40
customers. Abou Hassan had to cut his employees from around 18 to four.
Sagging numbers
With its beautiful mountains, stunning beaches, Roman ruins and Ottoman
architecture, Lebanon’s economy has long leaned on tourism, which accounts for
more than a quarter of its gross domestic product. Visitor numbers are down
nearly 38 percent from 2010. But the war in neighboring Syria is just one of the
factors, says Lebanon’s Minister of Tourism Fady Abboud. "We don’t have a
road link with the rest of the world because certainly we don’t have a link with
Israel, the only link is through Syria and probably I lost about a quarter of a
million tourists coming by road to Lebanon, mainly Jordanians, Iranians and
certainly from the Gulf," he said. To entice tourists, the ministry recently
offered a promotion of 50 days for 50 percent off. Discounts were offered on
airline tickets, hotels and restaurants.
Nizar Khoury is head of the commercial section for Lebanon’s national carrier,
Middle East Airlines.
"I regret to tell you that it hasn’t really worked because the reason for the
Arab nationals not coming to Beirut is not the price actually; it’s the
situation, political and security situation.
So Lebanon is trying to diversify its pool of tourists by reaching out to new
audiences from Russia, Latin America and Africa, among others
Israel will seek US air strikes to thwart Hezbollah missile
transfer
Ynetnews/Britain's Guardian says Jerusalem will use US president's visit to
persuade Washington to carry out air strikes on Syrian missiles if there is
evidence they are being handed over to Hezbollah
Israel will use President Obama's visit which begins on Wednesday to try to
persuade the US to carry out air strikes on Syrian missiles if there is evidence
that they are being handed over to Hezbollah in Lebanon, or at least to give
full support to Israeli military action to stop the transfer, Britain's The
Guardian newspaper reported Sunday.
The Guardian claims that Obama will also come under Israeli pressure to lower
the US threshold for military action against Iran, while the US president will
try to extract greater Israeli commitment to a peace process with the
Palestinians. Neither side is likely to be successful, leaving Syria as the most
promising arena for US-Israeli agreement. The Obama administration has made
clear, says The Guardian, that it would intervene militarily to stop the Assad
regime using its chemical or biological weapons or transferring them to
extremist groups, but Israeli officials say they feel they have been left alone
to deal with the threat of the spread of Syria's arsenal of anti-aircraft and
anti-ship missiles. In January, Israeli warplanes destroyed a Syrian convoy that
Israeli officials say was taking sophisticated Russian-made ground-to-air
missiles to Hezbollah.
The government of Benjamin Netanyahu has made clear that it would strike again
in similar circumstances.A day after the convoy was destroyed the Syrian army
made an official announcement in which it stated: "Syria holds Israel and those
who are protecting it at the Security Council responsible for the results of the
attack and confirms its right to defend its land and sovereignty."
Hezbollah fighter killed in Syria buried in Lebanon
Daily Star/March 17, 2013 /MARJAYOUN, Lebanon: The body of a
Hezbollah member killed in fighting in Syria was buried in southern Lebanon
early on Sunday, several residents of the man's village told AFP.
"The funeral of Hassan Nimr Shartuni, 25, was this morning in Mays al-Jabal
after the arrival of his body from Syria where he was killed in fighting
yesterday (Saturday)," one resident told AFP.
Two other residents, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the details
of Shartuni's burial. Lebanese group Hezbollah has in recent months buried a
number of fighters killed in Syria, without publicly disclosing how the men were
killed, or where.Sources close to the movement have said only that the men were
killed "while carrying out their jihadist duty."The group has acknowledged that
its members living in Syrian villages on the border with Lebanon have taken part
in battles against "armed groups" in self-defence. But it refuses to discuss
allegations by Syrian rebels that it has sent fighters from Lebanon to bolster
the forces of its ally, President Bashar al-Assad.
The issue has inflamed tensions in Lebanon, where the domestic opposition which
backs the Syrian uprising has accused Hezbollah of endangering the country by
intervening in the conflict.
The group has in turn accused the opposition of backing the Syrian uprising and
turning a blind eye to the flow of weapons and Syrian rebels across the Lebanese
border.
The Syrian conflict, which began with peaceful protests against the Assad
regime, is now in its third year. The United Nations says that at least 70,000
people have been killed, and more than one million Syrians have been forced to
seek refuge abroad. Millions more have been internally displaced.On Saturday, at
least 126 people were killed in fighting across the country, according to the
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights activists -- 54 rebels, 28 regime forces and
44 civilians.
Hezbollah MP slams U.S. ambassador ‘interference’
March 18, 2013/The Daily Star/BEIRUT: Hezbollah’s Baalbek-Hermel
MP Nawar Saheli denounced Sunday what he called “flagrant interference” by U.S.
Ambassador to Lebanon Maura Connelly in internal Lebanese affairs when, he said,
she demanded that “the forthcoming elections be held on the basis of the 1960
law.”“We in Lebanon do not accept [foreign] ambassadors or ministers to
interfere in our internal affairs.She [Connelly] should have applied the law in
her country,” Saheli told a sports event organized by Hezbollah in the northern
Bekaa Valley town of Al-Ain. He urged those within the March 14 alliance who are
keen on Lebanon’s sovereignty to ask the U.S. ambassador to respect diplomatic
rules and not interfere in internal Lebanese affairs. Earlier this month,
Connelly told reporters after meeting Speaker Nabih Berri that parliamentary
polls should be held on time regardless of whether politicians reach a consensus
on a new electoral law.“We encourage Lebanon to hold its elections on time,” she
said. Lebanese politicians have been at loggerheads over which electoral law
will govern the 2013 polls.
French wish to arm rebels behind Syria’s threat to Lebanon:
FSA
March 17, 2013/The Daily Star/BEIRUT: A recent Syrian threat to
target rebels in Lebanon came in response to a French decision to arm those
seeking to topple President Bashar Assad, the media coordinator for the Free
Syrian Army said in remarks published Sunday. “The letter sent from the Syrian
Foreign Ministry to Lebanese authorities is in retaliation for a French decision
to arm the rebels with missiles,” political and media coordinator Louay al-Meqdad
told Lebanon’s An-Nahar newspaper.Damascus, in a letter sent to Lebanon’s
Foreign Ministry Thursday, warned Beirut it would attack Syrian rebels in
Lebanon, reiterating its claims that arms and gunmen were being smuggled from
the poorly delineated border.The letter said Syrian forces were still exercising
self-restraint by not striking “concentrations of armed gangs inside Lebanese
territory in order to prevent them from crossing into Syrian territory.”“But
this will not last indefinitely,” the letter warned.
France and Britain said Thursday they wanted an EU arms embargo to Syria lifted,
arguing Europe could not allow the Syrian people to be massacred. The EU
rejected the proposal Friday but European Union foreign ministers will consider
the issue again next week.The FSA official also told An-Nahar that Syrian rebels
would withdraw from border towns in Lebanon and return to Syria if the Lebanese
Army could ensure proper control of the shared border.“The Free Syria Army is
ready to cease fire and draw back its units toward Syrian territories on
condition that the Lebanese Army controls the joint border with Syria,” he told
the Lebanese daily.
President Michel Sleiman stressed over the weekend that the Lebanese Army needed
to prevent the infiltration of fighters across the border with Syria and said he
had issued instructions to the military to arrest militants.
He also reiterated commitment to Lebanon’s self-disassociation policy toward
developments in the region, particularly in Syria.
Violence has repeatedly spilled over into Lebanon as a result of the
two-year-old crisis in Syria.
March 14 members commemorate 8th anniversary
Now Lebanon/The opposition March 14 coalition on Sunday
celebrated its eighth anniversary in Beirut’s BIEL exhibition hall, an event
marked by the absence of its top leaders. The rally did not see Future Movement
leader MP Saad Hariri, nor the head of the Lebanese Forces Samir Geagea or
Kataeb chief Amine Gemayel speak. None of the three leaders attended the
ceremony, with both Hariri and Geagea citing security reasons for their absence.
However, Future bloc MP and former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora was present,
along with a number of opposition and independent MPs. “We will keep on fighting
for our values until we reach true independence and the liberty we all strive
for,” Siniora said as he wrapped up the ceremony. During the rally, fourteen
civil society activists from different backgrounds gave speeches tackling
various Lebanese political, social and security issues. March 14’s “martyrs”
were remembered, notably the founder of the Future Movement, former Prime
Minister Rafiq Hariri, who was assassinated in 2005. “Ever since the
assassination of Rafiq Hariri, [prosperity] has turned into destruction,” an
activist said. “The Martyrs make a nation,” another added. The issue of
Hezbollah’s weapons was also tackled in the speeches, with activist Elie Fawaz
saying that “it is [unlikely] that Hezbollah would hand in its weapons, but it
is not impossible.” “We say no to any arms that threaten to [plunge the country]
into strife. We only want legitimate weapons,” said another activist commenting
on the same issue. Meanwhile, Jean-Pierre Katrib talked about respecting
citizens’ freedom and rights and stressed the necessity to protect them from any
violence.“We will not allow Al-Nusra Front or other [organizations] to fight any
Lebanese,” another activist said.On Friday, a military judge charged ten
Lebanese people for being members of the Al-Nusra Front, a day after the Syrian
regime warned Beirut that it might target “terrorists” on Lebanese territory if
the state took no action to stop the flow of fighters into Syria. The Syrian
demarche came amid accusations against Hezbollah that the party is fighting
against the rebels in Syria.During the rally, one activist warned about
politically covering up for killers, kidnappers and thieves, while another
addressed the issue of sectarianism within the country. “The cure for Lebanon is
a civil state,” the activist said. The March 14 coalition is named after the
mass anti-Syrian rally in 2005 during which over one million Lebanese converged
on central Beirut to demand the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon and an
end to Syrian meddling in Lebanese political affairs.The mass protest took place
a month after the assassination of Lebanon’s former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri
on February 14, 2005 that killed 21 people and launched the Cedar Revolution
against Syrian hegemony over Lebanon.
Lebanese President Michel Suleiman says parliamentary elections an “internal”
concern
Now Lebanon/Lebanese President Michel Suleiman said on Saturday that the
country’s parliamentary elections are an internal concern, the National News
Agency reported.
“The parliamentary elections remains an internal Lebanese concern, and efforts
are focused on coming- p with a modern and democratic law that agrees with the
Taif Accord [stipulations] and constitutional strategies,” Suleiman said during
a press conference following his meeting with Ghanaian President John Dramani
Mahama.
Lebanon’s political players are currently debating prospective electoral law
proposals that may be adopted for the upcoming parliamentary elections, but so
far they have failed to reach a consensus on an electoral law proposal to
replace the 1960 law currently on the books. Meanwhile, Suleiman and Prime
Minister Miqati in March signed off on a decree in March stating that elections
will take place on June 9, a move that would have the elections held in
accordance with the current 1960 law if the country’s political parties fail to
reach a consensus on a new electoral law.Suleiman went on to praise the “major
role that Ghana still plays at the level of peace-keeping operations in the
world; especially in its participation in the "UNIFIL" peace-keeping forces in
South Lebanon.” He added that “the Lebanese community in Ghana is given special
attention and care… and it contributes greatly to the economic empowerment and
[general] development of the country.” Suleiman and Mahama both agreed on
Lebanon and Ghana's attachment to the United Nations' legislations and
decisions. They also highlighted the urgent need for “initiating serious
dialogue between civilizations, cultures and religions in order to confront
certain factors that are pushing towards clashes, extremism and violence.”
Mahama, in turn, praised the historical, friendly ties between Lebanon and
Ghana, and the active presence and contribution of Lebanese community in Ghana.
He stressed Lebanon's pioneering role, whereby he considered that “a state of
prevailing peace in Lebanon becomes an added value to the world at large.”Later
Saturday, Suleiman met with the Lebanese community in Ghana where he stressed
that “the Lebanese Armed Forces are the [far reaching] symbol of national
unity.” He also said that “a defense strategy must be implemented through which
the LAF will benefit from the Resistance’s capabilities until it obtains the
tools and equipment which enable it to fulfill its national duty in an
independent manner.” Suleiman left Beirut on Tuesday for Senegal to start a tour
of several African countries to meet top officials as well as members of
Lebanese communities in Africa.
Lebanon’s President Michel Suleiman won’t allow adoption of
sectarian electoral law
Now Lebanon/Lebanon’s President Michel Suleiman reiterated his
refusal of the Orthodox electoral proposal as an alternative to the current 1960
law for the upcoming parliamentary elections.
“I will not accept the [adoption] of a sectarian electoral law during my term,”
Suleiman said on Sunday on his Twitter account. The head of state went on to say
that “no Lebanese president would accept the state imposing its opinion on the
electoral law.” Suleiman explained in another tweet that the new electoral draft
should be a “modern” law that would respect the Taif Accord, the negotiated
settlement that brought an end to Lebanon’s 15 year civil war. The president has
previously voiced his objection to the sectarian-based Orthodox law, which was
endorsed by Lebanon’s four major Christian parties and approved by the joint
parliamentary commissions in February. Suleiman, along with Prime Minister Najib
Miqati, signed a decree to hold the elections on June 9, a move that would have
the elections held according to the current 1960 law if the country’s political
parties fail to reach a consensus on a new electoral draft. This decision
sparked angry responses from the March 8 coalition, who refuse to contest an
election under the 1960 electoral law and advocate for the adoption of the
Orthodox law, which proposes proportional representation and voting along
sectarian lines. However, the Orthodox law was met with vocal opposition and
claims that it would lead to sectarian divisions within the country.
Future MP Mouin Merhebi: Iran seeks to control Lebanon
Now Lebanon/Lebanon’s Future bloc MP Mouin Merhebi said
that Iran has made a decision to try and control Lebanon rather than attempt to
exert control over Syria.
“The reason that the security threats have been made by Iran’s allies in Lebanon
is to control Lebanon entirely. It is to ensure the Syrian army [has a means of
withdrawing] from Syria when it is trapped,” Merhebi told As-Siyasah Kuwaiti
newspaper in remarks published Sunday. He continued: “[President Bashar]
al-Assad’s regime is working on moving his forces closer to the coast [in an
effort] to maintain the safety of these forces. This is being done… because
their retreating inland has become increasingly difficult over the course of
time.” “Regime forces will enter Lebanon through the northern Al-Masnaa border
crossing and the crossings controlled by the general command, in addition to the
Akroum, Wadi Khaled, and Al-Arida areas. [They will move to] consolidate the
Assad-controlled areas with the ones controlled by Hezbollah.”
The opposition MP also warned that “this topic is worrying because of the
Lebanese Armed Forces’ compliance with these talks as for its withdrawal from
said areas; in addition, Interior Minister Marwan Charbel has given orders to
evacuate the Wadi Khaled police station of its security members.” On Saturday,
military reinforcements have reached Syrian regime posts overlooking Lebanese
northern border towns, Anadolu news agency reported.
Later Saturday, Free Syrian Army spokesperson Louay Almokdad said in a televised
interview that Hezbollah is sending military reinforcements to the
Lebanese-Syrian border areas.
Lebanon is sharply divided over the Syrian conflict, with the Sunni-led March 14
movement supporting the revolt against President Bashar al-Assad and the Shiite
Hezbollah and its allies backing the regime
More than 70,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed since the outbreak
of Syria's anti-regime revolt in March 2011, according to the Syrian Observatory
for Human Rights.
Lebanon responds to Syria warning
AFP/Lebanon must prevent fighters from crossing into Syria,
Lebanese President Michel Suleiman said after Damascus threatened to respond to
cross-border infiltrations and started deploying troops on the Lebanese border.
Shortly after his office announced the comments, made in a meeting with the
Lebanese community in the Ivory Coast during an official visit, witnesses on
Saturday reported a Syrian troop buildup along parts of the border with Lebanon.
Lebanon's stability depends "on all of us... not sending militants to Syria and
not receiving them," Suleiman said, adding "we must commit ourselves to
neutrality."
Suleiman said he had tasked Lebanon's army with "the arrest of any militants
intending to fight [in Syria], whether for the opposition or not."
A statement released by Prime Minister Najib Miqati's office said the premier
had met the army chief to discuss "the measures being taken by the Lebanese
military... on the border with Syria to prevent the infiltration of militants
and arms smuggling operation." Syria warned on Thursday that its forces would
fire into Lebanon if "terrorist gangs" continued to infiltrate the country.
"These past 36 hours, armed terrorist gangs have infiltrated Syrian territory in
large numbers from Lebanon," the Syrian foreign ministry said, in a message
quoted by official news agency SANA.
"Syrian forces are showing restraint by not striking these gangs inside Lebanese
territory to prevent them crossing into Syria, but this will not go on
indefinitely," it said in a message to its Lebanese counterpart.
A Lebanese government source, speaking to AFP on Saturday, said Beirut took the
warning "very seriously" and that "intensive consultations are underway to find
the best way to control the border."
On Saturday afternoon, witnesses in villages along Lebanon's northern border
reported an increased Syrian troop presence on the Syrian side, visible from
villages including Wadi Khaled and Al-Arida.
Lebanon's opposition March 14th movement, which opposes the Damascus regime, has
called for the army to deploy along the border with Syria to halt the flow of
arms and militants, and protect Lebanese territory. Beirut has officially
pledged neutrality in the violence engulfing its neighbor, but has found itself
increasingly embroiled in the civil war. Lebanon's opposition backs the revolt,
which entered its third year on Friday, while the Shiite Hezbollah and its
allies stand by the Syrian regime. Violence has already spilled over into
Lebanon on several occasions, causing fatalities, and on Thursday the UN
Security Council expressed "grave concern" about cross-border attacks.
Beirut on edge after Sheikhs assaulted
Now Lebanon/Tensions rose in Beirut late Sunday evening following attacks
against Sunni Sheikhs in Shiite neighborhoods, sparking anger as protesters cut
roads and armed men appeared on the streets of Beirut's Tariq al-Jedideh
neighborhood. Two Sheikhs, identified as Mazen Hariri and Ahmad Fakhran, were
beaten in the central Beirut neighborhood of Khandaq al-Ghamik while walking
from Downtown Beirut's Mohammad al-Amin Mosque, the National News Agency
reported. Meanwhile, another sheikh, identified as Omar Imami, was assaulted in
the South Beirut suburb of Shiyyah, Lebanon's state agency added.
Following the incident, protesters in Sunni areas of Lebanon's capital began
cutting roads, as tension rose in the city. Sunni Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir checked
up on two of the wounded Sheikhs in the Makassed Hospital in Beirut’s Tariq al-Jedideh
neighborhood, as hundreds of young men with Islamist flags gathered outside the
building to protest against the attack. The protesters then marched to the
nearby Imam Ali Mosque, where a number of them started firing their weapons into
the air, an eyewitness told NOW. Following the gathering and prayers, the angry
Sunni youths rushed to the Kola roundabout and began burning tires and garbage
dumpsters. Smoke rose into the air all across the Kola roundabout that links the
Sidon-Beirut highway to the central areas of Lebanon’s capital.Armed men could
be seen roaming the streets of Tariq al-Jedideh, the eyewitness said, adding
that traffic was at a minimal. As the night wore on, the Lebanese army deployed
to on the western side of the Kola roundabout across from Tariq al-Jedideh, the
eyewitness added. Local media outlets reported that roads were also cut in
Beirut's Tayouneh neighborhood as well as in Sidon. Amid the growing tension,
the Lebanese army announced in a statement that it had raided the homes of men
suspected in the attacks, arresting five of them. Lebanon's top Sunni cleric,
Grand Mufti Mohammad Rashid Qabbani, called for "self-restraint" following the
incident. Meanwhile, Lebanese Premier Najib Miqati wrote late Sunday night
on his Twitter account, "May God protect Lebanon from these [agitations] and
aggressors from any party will be held accountable."Lebanese Interior Minister
Marwan Charbel also visited the Makassed Hospital in Tariq al-Jedideh, saying
afterward that he had spoken with Speaker Nabih Berri—the leader of the Shiite
Amal Movement—who stressed security forces need to take action against the
perpetrators of the Sheikhs’ assaults, MTV reported.
Hezbollah and the Amal Movement condemned the attack on the Sheikhs in Khandaq
al-Ghamik, saying the incident aimed to incite strife.Protesters gather Sunday
outside the Imam Ali Mosque in Beirut's Tariq al-Jedideh. (NOW)Following the
incident, MTV reported that supporters of the sheikhs blocked the road at Cite
Sportive and Corniche al-Mazraa.
Sunni Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir: I have no problem with the
army
Now Lebanon/Sidon’s Sunni Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir claimed that he
is not in conflict with the Lebanese Armed Forces despite several confrontations
between the army and the cleric’s supporters in recent weeks.
“I have no problem with the Lebanese army or the Shiite sect,” Assir was quoted
as saying during a protest he called for Sunday afternoon in Sidon’s Al-Karama
roundabout.
Assir has caused disturbances in Sidon in recent weeks following his calls to
hold sit-ins in protest against the alleged deployment of gunmen affiliated with
the Shiite party Hezbollah in apartments near his Bilal Bin Rabbah Mosque in
Abra. The daily protests has necessitated the deployment of security forces in
the southern city, with an entire brigade reportedly encircling the firebrand
Sunni cleric’s Sidon mosque earlier in the week, blocking access to it. Sheikh
Assir rose to prominence for his outspoken opposition to the regime of Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad and his calls for disarming the Shiite party
'Hezbollah.
Future MP, MP Khaled Zahraman : Syria wants to plunge Lebanon into unrest
Now Lebanon/Future bloc MP Khaled Zahraman said that the regime of Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad is looking to cause conflict in Lebanon. “The Syrian
regime seems to have taken the decision to [spark disturbances] across Lebanon,”
Zahraman told Future TV on Sunday. The opposition lawmaker specified certain
areas he claimed that the Syrian regime is planning to strike. “There are
indicators of a military operation in Akkar, and [others of spurring conflict]
in Tripoli which has seen its [security] situation deteriorate.” The Future
official went on to say that Syrian regime forces “have the intention to enter
Lebanese territory.” On Thursday, the Syrian regime warned Beirut that it might
target “terrorists” on Lebanese territory if the state takes no action to stop
them from entering into Syria. The protest note came following repeated deadly
clashes along the Syria-Lebanon border in the two years of the conflict between
the Assad regime and the rebel opposition which has so far claimed the lives of
over 70,000 people.
Change and Reform bloc leader MP Michel Aoun holds Miqati
responsible for border violations
Now Lebanon/Change and Reform bloc leader MP Michel Aoun said the
country’s premier has failed to prevent disturbances in Lebanese border towns as
a result of the Syrian war.
“I hold the prime minister responsible, because being neutral on the Syrian
[conflict] means not allowing for the [conflict] to spill over to Lebanon,” Aoun
said on Sunday following a visit he made to the Keserwan district.
The Free Patriotic Movement chief added that the border Lebanon shares with
war-stricken Syria “should not remain open to armed men and weapons smuggling.”
“It is every country’s responsibility to secure its border and not allowing them
to be used to attack a neighboring state,” Aoun added. The FPM leader went on to
urge security officials to “[control] the border and fight extremism.” The
Lebanese government has insisted on maintaining a neutral stance regarding
events in Syria, despite its disassociation policy being cast into doubt after
Hezbollah was accused of providing military support to the regime of Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad and fighting against rebels in towns along the
Syrian-Lebanese border. Elsewhere, Aoun criticized the representation of the
Christians in the parliament. “The [majority] of Christian MPs in the parliament
are not elected by the Christians, which makes the latter’s voice marginalized.”
Christian concerns over their representation in the parliament emerged amid
discussions over a new electoral law for the upcoming parliamentary elections.
This prompted the leaders of Lebanon’s four major Christian parties – including
the FPM - to endorse the Orthodox proposal, claiming it ensured fair
representation for Lebanon's Christians. The Orthodox draft was approved by the
joint parliamentary commissions but met with severe criticism from the Future
Movement, Progressive Socialist Party and independent Christian MPs, as well as
President Michel Suleiman and Prime Minister Najib Miqati, who warned that the
proposal would lead to sectarian divisions in the country.
Hezbollah MP Ali Fayyad: Security ‘chaos’ poses threat to
elections, not electoral law issue
Now Lebanon/Lebanon’s Loyalty to the Resistance bloc MP Ali
Fayyad said it is security “chaos” that is threatening the upcoming
parliamentary elections, not the adoption of a new electoral law.
“Security chaos caused by sectarian tension and armed groups who seek to close
areas off to others, threaten the army, and rebel against state institutions are
threatening [the sanctity of the] elections; it is not the debate over the
adoption of a new law,” the National News Agency quoted Fayyad as saying during
an event held on Sunday. The Hezbollah MP added that “while we stress the
necessity of holding the parliamentary elections according to a new consensual
law, those [in reference to the Future Movement and the Progressive Socialist
Party] who are promising us a new law… have refused the most balanced of laws
proposed during the sub-committee’s meetings.”
“We expect that what is being prepared lacks political balance, unity, and does
not provide proper representation for Christians,” he continued. Earlier in
March, Premier Najib Miqati and President Michel Suleiman signed off on a decree
to hold the elections on June 9, a move that would have the elections held
according to the current 1960 law if the country’s political parties fail to
reach a consensus on a new electoral law.
March 8’s Change and Reform bloc party has called for the Orthodox law—which the
Lebanese Forces and Kataeb backed—to be brought up for a vote in a general
session of the parliament, but Speaker Nabih Berri has said that he would not
convene the legislature until consensus can be reached on a law. However,
sources told NOW the Future Movement and PSP have reached consensus on a mixed
electoral law based on majoritarian voting in 26 electoral districts and
proportional voting in 9 other constituencies which they will discuss with other
parties and expect will get approval of the majority.
Lebanon’s National Liberal Party leader MP Dori Chamoun
says March 14 still maintains unity
Now Lebanon/Lebanon’s National Liberal Party leader MP Dori
Chamoun said that March 14 still maintains its unity in spite of differences in
opinion regarding the electoral law issue. “The March 14 group is still cohesive
and maintains its unity in spite of the differing opinions its parties hold
about the electoral law issue,” the National News Agency quoted Chamoun as
saying on Sunday. Lebanon’s political circles are currently debating prospective
electoral law proposals that can be adopted for the upcoming parliamentary
elections.Disagreement over the issues has hit the March 14 alliance after its
main political party, the Future Movement, voiced its opposition to electoral
laws based on proportional voting, while Lebanon’s four major Christian
parties—Future Movement’s allies the Lebanese Forces and Kataeb—have expressed
support for the Orthodox Gathering law, which calls for proportional voting
along sectarian lines. Chamoun also reiterated that he is against the 1960
electoral law “which nobody wants. However, even if a better [law proposal]
fails to be agreed upon, I will still run for the parliamentary elections.”
“Holding the elections based on a bad law is better than not holding them at
all,” the NLP leader added. Meanwhile, President Michel Suleiman and Prime
Minister Najib Miqati, early in March, signed off on a decree to hold the
elections on June 9, a move that would have the elections held according to the
current 1960 law if the country’s political parties fail to reach a consensus on
a new electoral law.
Jordan, Lebanon playing with "fire," Syrian daily says
AFP/Lebanon and Jordan are playing with fire by allowing jihadists and weapons
to pass across their borders into Syria, the Syrian government daily Al-Thawra
warned on Sunday."The fire of terrorism will consume not only Syria, but could
spread to Lebanon and Jordan, particularly if these two countries intervene in
the situation in Syria, ignoring the flow of armed men and weapons from their
territory, or by participating directly in the conspiracy against Syria," the
newspaper said."Jordan has opened its borders in recent days [allowing] passage
of jihadists... whereas before it was satisfied with just facilitating the
movement of elements trained on its territory by US intelligence," it added. "As
for Lebanon, it is closing its eyes to the trafficking of weapons to Syria, led
by elements that are not part of the government." On Friday, a security source
in Damascus criticized Jordan, saying the kingdom has "opened its borders and is
allowing to cross over [into Syria] jihadists and Croatian weapons bought by
Saudi Arabia.""This can only intensify the conflict and cause more casualties,"
the source told AFP in Beirut on condition of anonymity. "There's been a change
of attitude because up until now, Jordan had imposed strict controls on its
border to prevent the passage of terrorists and weapons," said the source,
blaming "pressure by countries that are hostile to Syria" for the change. And on
Thursday, Syria's foreign ministry warned that it would retaliate if Lebanon
continued to allow "armed terrorist gangs" to infiltrate.
"Syrian forces are showing restraint by not striking these gangs inside Lebanese
territory to prevent them crossing into Syria, but this will not go on
indefinitely," it said in a message to its Lebanese counterpart.
Beirut has officially pledged neutrality in the violence engulfing its neighbor,
but has found itself increasingly embroiled in the civil war.
Lebanon's opposition backs the revolt, which entered its third year on Friday,
while the Shiite Hezbollah and its allies stand by the Syrian regime.
Violence has already spilled over into Lebanon on several occasions, causing
fatalities, and on Thursday the UN Security Council expressed "grave concern"
about cross-border attacks.
Hezbollah MP Kamel Rifai denounces “attack” on Lebanon's
Mufti
Now Lebanon/Loyalty to the Resistance bloc MP Kamel Rifai
condemned the Future Movement’s “attack” on Lebanon’s Grand Mufti Sheikh
Mohammad Rashid Qabbani after relations between him and the mainly Sunni party
have soured of late.“There is a political party within the Sunni confession that
has been trying to annul any political opinion that goes against its internal
and regional political plan,” the National News Agency quoted Rifai as saying on
Sunday.The Hezbollah lawmaker also spoke against the premier’s remarks that he
would take action if the Mufti does not hold elections for a new Higher Islamic
Council.
The March 8 official labeled the prime minister’s statement as “an encroachment
on the Mufti’s authorities.”“We refuse any [offense against] Dar al-Fatwa,”
Rifai added. On Wednesday, Premier Najib Miqati said he would hold an emergency
meeting if the Mufti does not heed calls to convene the Higher Islamic Council
before March 16 in order to elect a new council, a statement Qabbani
characterized as “threatening.”
In November 2012, Qabbani called for a new election for the Higher Islamic
Council at the end of the year, but clerics in the body allied with the Future
Movement opposed the move, after which the Grand Mufti reversed his decision.
The mostly Sunni Future Movement and Qabbani are at loggerheads over the
management of the Dar al-Fatwa religious body. Qabbani later had a disagreement
with the Higher Islamic Council as well, after the latter extended its own term
without the Mufti’s approval. Reports speculate that there are clerics in the
council who aim to unseat Qabbani as Grand Mufti.
Obama hails new Israel government
AFP/President Barack Obama looks forward to "working closely"
with the new Israeli government formed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
ahead of the US leader's visit, officials said Saturday."President Obama looks
forward to working closely with the Prime Minister and the new government to
address the many challenges we face and advance our shared interest in peace and
security," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in a statement.
Ex-army chief Yaalon named Israel's new defense minister
AFP/Former chief of staff Moshe Yaalon was named Israel's new defense minister
on Sunday to succeed Ehud Barak, a statement from the ruling rightwing Likud
party said. "In a period so critical to the security of the state of Israel,
with all the region around us in turmoil, it is important that this position be
filled by a man so rich in experience as Moshe Yaalon," Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu said in a statement released by the party. "In the name of all the
citizens of Israel, I wish him success."The bespectacled 62-year-old has made a
name for himself as a strong supporter of Jewish settlers in the occupied West
Bank, but has shown himself to be more moderate regarding Iran, whose nuclear
program Israel sees as a bid to build a weapons capability. On Saturday evening,
Netanyahu formally notified President Shimon Peres that after 40 days of
tortuous negotiations he had formed a new government, just as a legal deadline
for him to do so expired. The new government will be sworn in on Monday, just
two days before the arrival of US President Barack Obama on his first visit to
Israel and the Palestinian territories since being elected more than four years
ago. The rightwing coalition will control 68 of the 120 seats in parliament and
comprise Netanyahu's Likud-Beitenu list (31 seats), the centrist Yesh Atid (19
seats), the far-right national-religious Jewish Home (12 seats) and the centrist
HaTnuah (six seats).
French wish to arm rebels behind Syria’s threat to Lebanon:
FSA
March 17, 2013/ The Daily Star /BEIRUT: A recent Syrian threat to
target rebels in Lebanon came in response to a French decision to arm those
seeking to topple President Bashar Assad, the media coordinator for the Free
Syrian Army said in remarks published Sunday. “The letter sent from the Syrian
Foreign Ministry to Lebanese authorities is in retaliation for a French decision
to arm the rebels with missiles,” political and media coordinator Louay al-Meqdad
told Lebanon’s An-Nahar newspaper. Damascus, in a letter sent to Lebanon’s
Foreign Ministry Thursday, warned Beirut it would attack Syrian rebels in
Lebanon, reiterating its claims that arms and gunmen were being smuggled from
the poorly delineated border. The letter said Syrian forces were still
exercising self-restraint by not striking “concentrations of armed gangs inside
Lebanese territory in order to prevent them from crossing into Syrian
territory.”“But this will not last indefinitely,” the letter warned. France and
Britain said Thursday they wanted an EU arms embargo to Syria lifted, arguing
Europe could not allow the Syrian people to be massacred. The EU rejected the
proposal Friday but European Union foreign ministers will consider the issue
again next week. The FSA official also told An-Nahar that Syrian rebels would
withdraw from border towns in Lebanon and return to Syria if the Lebanese Army
could ensure proper control of the shared border. “The Free Syria Army is ready
to cease fire and draw back its units toward Syrian territories on condition
that the Lebanese Army controls the joint border with Syria,” he told the
Lebanese daily. President Michel Sleiman stressed over the weekend that the
Lebanese Army needed to prevent the infiltration of fighters across the border
with Syria and said he had issued instructions to the military to arrest
militants. He also reiterated commitment to Lebanon’s self-disassociation policy
toward developments in the region, particularly in Syria.
Violence has repeatedly spilled over into Lebanon as a result of the
two-year-old crisis in Syria.
Syria’s pro-Assad hackers infiltrate Human Rights Watch Web
site and Twitter feed
Posted by Max Fisher on March 17, 2013
Screenshot taken Sunday 4:55 p.m. EST (Washington Post)
Hackers associated with the Syrian Electronic Army, which supports President
Bashar al-Assad, appear to have hacked into the Web site and Twitter feed of
Human Rights Watch. The NGO, one of the world’s most respected, has conducted a
number of searing investigations into the human rights abuses of Assad’s regime
since fighting began in Syria. The hackers posted messages announcing their
presence and condemning Human Rights Watch (HRW). “All Your reports are FALSE !!
Stop lying!!!” one message read. The messages on the HRW site redirect to the
homepage of the Syrian Electronic Army. A screenshot of the hacked HRW page
appears at the top of this page. Ironically, it included the tags “Syria” and
“Press freedom.” The hackers also appeared to have seized the HRW Twitter
account, which has over a half-million followers. This tweet directs readers to
the above, hacked page:
Syria rebels seize security compound near Golan
Yazen Homsy/By Khaled Yacoub Oweis
Sun Mar 17, 2013/AMMAN (Reuters) - Syrian rebels on Sunday seized a Syrian
military intelligence compound in the southern Hauran Plain near the
Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, stepping up attacks in the strategic region
which stretches to the outskirts of the capital Damascus, rebel commanders said.
The frontier, quiet since Israel and Syria agreed on a U.S.-brokered ceasefire
in 1974, has turned volatile in recent weeks, after opposition brigades stepped
up attacks against army and intelligence compounds dotting the agricultural
plain stretching from the border with Jordan to the Damascus outskirts.
At least 70,000 people have been killed since a peaceful protest movement led by
Syria's Sunni Muslim majority broke out two years ago against four decades of
family rule by President Bashar al-Assad, who belongs to the minority Alawite
sect, and his father, the late Hafez al-Assad. The demonstrations were met by
bullets, eventually sparking a Sunni backlash and a mostly Islamist armed
insurgency increasingly spearheaded by the al Qaeda linked al-Nusra Front,
creating a political dilemma for regional and Western powers and deepening the
Shi'ite-Sunni divide in the Middle East. The compound near the Yarmouk River in
the town of Shagara, 8 km (5 miles) from a ceasefire line with Israel, fell
after a five-day siege, the sources said. "We have completely taken over this
security compound this morning. It's a command center for the shabbiha
(pro-Assad militia). They retreated after strong blows dealt to them during a
five day siege," said Abu Iyas al-Haurani, a member of the Yarmouk Martyrs
Brigade. "Anyone who was arrested in the Yarmouk Valley was sent to this
military intelligence headquarters to be tortured and it has a strategic
importance. With its fall we have completed our liberation of the town of
Shagara," he added. Another rebel commander said the aim of the attacks in
western Hauran is to open a new front in the fight against Assad that would
stretch troops deployed in Hauran, cradle of the two-year revolt, and to secure
a supply route to the western and southern approaches of Damascus, where battles
have been fierce.
Assad's elite forces, however, remain dug in at Qasioun Mountain in the center
of Damascus.
DAMASCUS BATTLES
On Sunday battles broke out in the southern Damascus suburb of Sbeineh, a
residential area on the main road leading south into Hauran after opposition
fighters stormed a compound housing shabbiha militia, activists in the capital
said. Dozens of people were killed and wounded in the fighting and in ensuing
army shelling in the town, they added.
Rebel brigades overran last week a missile squadron in Khan Sheihoun, a town
southwest of Damascus on the road to the Golan, and seized an army barracks.
Further south, in the old center of Deraa, Hauran's main city, situated at the
border with Jordan, rebels were trying to take the Omari mosque, scene of
killings at a pro-democracy demonstration on March 18, 2011 that sparked the
national revolt, but security forces positioned at a nearby post office were
fighting back, activist Thaer al-Abdallah said from Deraa.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague interview with Sky News, said on Sunday
that Britain has "taken no decision at the moment to send arms to anybody in
Syria".
He said sending arms to the opposition had to be weighed against the risks of
"international terrorism and extremism taking root in Syria, the risks of
Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan being destabilized, and the risks of extreme humanitarian
distress."(Additional reporting by Suleiman al-Khalidi and Tim Castle; Editing by Stephen
Powell)
Lebanese Jew: 'We want an MP'
Carla El Zayed/Now Lebanon
If one were to ask Lebanese about their opinions on the Orthodox Gathering draft
electoral law, the answers would probably either be “odiously sectarian” or
“rectifying representation and alleviating fears.” Yet there is a third opinion
we have yet to hear about. “Voters exclusively elect candidates of their own
sect. Christian voters of minority sects shall vote for minority candidates
whereas Muslim voters of minority sects that are not represented by any
parliamentary seat shall have the right to vote for the Muslim candidates of
their choice regardless of their sects. Jewish voters shall have the right to
vote for the Muslim or Christian candidates of their choice.”
The above passage, paragraph C of Article 2 of the Orthodox Gathering offered,
knowingly or unknowingly, a way out of elections for those who wish: Be a Jew
and vote for the Muslim or Christian candidate of your choice. Some opponents of
the Orthodox Gathering draft on social networking sites are actually pondering
the idea of converting to Judaism in order to take part “freely” in the 2013
elections should the draft be adopted in the plenary session of parliament and
come into effect. But what do ethnic Jews want?
“Our community should be represented in parliament. We are the only Jewish
community in the Arab world that enjoys constitutional protection, but we are
not politically represented,” says Michel Zilkha, a Lebanese Jew who decided to
speak publicly to NOW because “it is important not to remain anonymous if we
want to obtain our rights.”
No electoral law ever adopted in Lebanon has earmarked seats for the Jewish
community. The 128 seats of the current parliament, including those of minority
sects, are divided equally between Christians and Muslims.
Former Deputy Speaker Elie al-Ferzli, who is considered ‘the father’ of the
Orthodox Gathering draft, explained to NOW that “Jews can file for candidacy if
the community is accounted for as part of the minority sects’ share.” However,
Ferzli went on to say that this seat is earmarked for Christian minorities in
the Beirut constituency, and is part of the [Christian minorities’] share.
Following the Ta’if Accord, the Alawite community, which is considered a
minority, obtained two seats of its own, one in Tripoli and the other in Akkar.
The Jewish community’s attempts to gain parliamentary representation date back
to 1937, a year that witnessed parliamentary reforms bringing the number of
parliamentary seats from 26 to 60. The Jewish community hoped then that it would
obtain a seat as part of the new bloc. Joseph Farhi, president of the Jewish
Council, visited then-President Émile Eddé, said at the time: “It is vital for
our interests to be represented in parliament.” Eddé was receptive in principle
to this demand, but [French] High Commissioner [Damien] de Martel showed little
enthusiasm for earmarking a parliamentary seat for the Jewish community.
The battle for seats between the government of Kheireddine al-Ahdab and its
opponents ended with the adoption of new divisions with 63 seats (42 elected and
21 appointed ones) with one seat added for minorities. Non-Jew Dr. Ayoub Tabet
was appointed to fill it and the Jewish community, which numbered 6,000 at the
time, remained unrepresented in parliament.
This history supports Zilkha’s belief that Jews have no seats in parliament “due
to a sacrosanct agreement between Christians and Muslims” on the division of
power. He asserts that Lebanon’s Jews need someone to represent them and defend
their rights, saying: “During the war, our properties were [forcefully] occupied
and when my father showed the police court-obtained documents to recover
buildings he owned, they said: ‘when you Jews return Palestine to us, we will
return your buildings to you.’” He went on: “This was the case with many Jews
who lost their property because we do not have any representative or political
party to stand for us.”
Despite the ‘privilege’ offered by the Orthodox Gathering draft, Zilkha believes
that it is pointless to take part in the elections: “I think I will not vote
because we are not represented.” Many among Lebanon’s Jews have changed their
religious affiliation on their IDs out of fear of persecution. “It might come as
a surprise to some that many companies currently operating in Lebanon are owned
by Jews.” He revealed that Lebanon is home to about 1,000 Jews, both residents
and visitors, adding: “Shabbat dinners are secretly held, and so are
celebrations featuring popular artists.”
When asked about his ties as a Jew with the State of Israel, Zilkha said: “I get
this question all the time. We are Lebanese Jews, much like Lebanese Christians
and Lebanese Muslims. We are stuck here because Lebanon is our nation and our
identity. Lebanon is there whenever we speak, live, eat, and breathe. Yet some
dare say we are not ‘Lebanese’, so what are we then? The [Lebanese] Jews who
emigrated to Europe and America went to cities with a Lebanese diaspora. This is
no coincidence, for we are one people. The majority of them refused to go to
Israel even though they were offered security and money. The majority chose to
go to Paris, New York, or Montreal instead. We are Lebanese, Lebanese Jews who
never emigrated to Israel as did the Jews of Iraq and Syria because they were
protected as a community. Israel, for me, is like Mecca for Muslims and the
Vatican for Christians: It is nothing more than a religious link.”
With regard to the Arab-Israeli conflict, Zilkha said that Arab Jews and
Palestinians have paid the dearest price: “Jews were massacred in Europe and
they wanted a country to protect them. Israel did, albeit at the expense of the
Palestinians, which were neither in Europe nor took part in the Holocaust, so
why are they suffering? What Europe’s Jews did was to come up with the idea of a
homogeneous ‘Jewish people’ whereas we, in reality, are brothers sharing the
same faith.” His concludes: “This is partly why some believe that every Jew is
Israeli.”
In this context, Zilkha described what he referred to as the ‘marginalization’
targeting Eastern Jews in Israel, saying: “Leadership positions in Israel all
went to the Ashkenazi (Western Jews). Still, the other side is also to blame for
this marginalization. When the state of Israel was founded in 1948, Jews in
Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere were evicted from their homes. Why? These innocent
people who have nothing to do with what is happening to the Palestinians were
thrown out of their respective countries following thousands of years of
contribution to the rich culture of these communities. Palestinians and Arab
Jews have been victims of many mistakes indeed.”
Zilkha is planning to return to Lebanon as soon as he finishes his studies in
the United States. He hopes that the opening of the Magen Abraham synagogue,
which is scheduled for this summer, will act as a prelude to a revival of the
community’s presence in Lebanon. “We will finally be able to pray in public
rather than in homes, as we used to do during the civil war… People will go to
the synagogue again,” he said. Still, his hope is fraught with caution: “Let us
not be naïve. Lebanon is still a dangerous country… Our businesses and
properties were stolen and the state did not stand up for us. My family lost
hope a long time ago but it stayed in Lebanon because we had nowhere else to
go.”
**This article is a translation of the original Arabic
Mufti’s transfer of managerial duties ‘symbolic’
March 18, 2013/By Wassim Mroueh
The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Grand Mufti Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani’s decision to transfer
managerial duties at Dar al-Fatwa to religious scholars is a symbolic move and
aims to show that the institution’s decisions are independent, said Sheikh
Mohammad Anis Arwadi, member of the Higher Islamic Council. “It is not the
significant move some are implying ... by this move, his eminence is saying that
the decisions at Dar al-Fatwa are independent and cannot be hijacked by a
certain political group,” Arwadi told The Daily Star Sunday.
“The grand mufti is delivering a message that Dar al-Fatwa has institutions,
each institution is managed by a sheikh and at the top is the grand mufti,”
Arwadi added.
Qabbani transferred the management of Dar al-Fatwa to religious scholars
Saturday. Arwadi said the move does not mean that the mufti has relinquished his
powers. “He only gives up his powers if he resigns.”
Qabbani said he would remain grand mufti until his term expires in September
2014.
A source from Dar al-Fatwa said Qabbani did not relinquish any his powers; on
the contrary, he made his decision in line with them.
“He tasked religious scholars with the day-to-day administrative management of
Dar al-Fatwa, he has the authority to ask anyone to handle this task,” the
source said.Prime Minister Najib Mikati and other former prime ministers urged
Qabbani last week to convene the Higher Islamic Council no later than March 16
in order to set a date for electing a new council, which is the top
administrative body for Sunnis.
They complained that by repeatedly turning down requests to hold a session,
Qabbani was disrupting the functioning of the Higher Islamic Council, which he
heads.
The officials also said they would take unspecified measures in the event that
Qabbani turn down their request.
But the grand mufti responded in a letter to Mikati Friday that he could not
convene the council, as its term had expired last year. Qabbani set elections
for a new council on April 14.
Contrary to Qabbani’s bidding, 22 members of the council, close to the Future
Movement of former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, extended the body’s term last
December. This new term would expire by the end of this year.
They argue their decision is lawful because it was published in the Official
Gazette and that Qabbani’s call for elections in April is illegal, as he did not
consult them before making it.
Ties between Qabbani and the Future Movement have deteriorated over the past two
years.
Dozens of protesters gathered near the headquarters of Dar al-Fatwa in the
Beirut neighborhood of Aisha Bakkar Saturday in support of Qabbani.
Speaking on behalf of the demonstrators, Ahmad Merhi said the gathering was
unplanned and aimed at supporting Qabbani.
“This meeting and spontaneous movement by Beirut’s youth comes to affirm that
this organization is fortified and should not be used for political purposes,”
Merhi said.
Sheikh Hisham Khalifeh, the general director of the Islamic Endowment, welcomed
the protesters and relayed to them the grand mufti’s appreciation of their
support.
Khalifeh expressed hope that politicians would take notice of their show of
support to the mufti. “We hope that this movement will represent the return of
wisdom to the minds of our politicians and [we hope] they will reconsider their
thoughts, and that Dar al-Fatwa will not be treated this way,” he said.
“We refuse to divide unity among Muslims just like the grand mufti, who has held
stances calling for the elections at the Higher Islamic Council to bring about a
new council, rather than [the current] one that only convenes to issue political
statements,” he added.
How long can Netanyahu’s disparate coalition survive?
DEBKAfile Special Report March 17, 2013/
After being sworn in Monday night, March 18, Binyamin Netanyahu’s third
government gets down to its first order of business the next day. Does anyone
know what that business is? The answer is no, because each of the components of
this roughly welded coalition government - his own Likud, Yesh Atid (Future),
Habayit Hayehudi (Jewish Home) and Hatnuah - has its own well-defined political,
social, economic and religious agendas.
Melding those agenda into agreed guidelines for action is obviously a Herculean
or even an impossible task, which is why some top people in Jerusalem say
half-jokingly that the new lineup will need “two years grace” – that is, if it
lasts one year.Even Netanyahu (“Bibi”) kidded the disgruntled members of his
Likud members who didn’t make it into the abbreviated government of 22 ministers
by wishing them better luck next time. That would presume his winning a fourth
term and beating the record of Israel’s founder and three-term prime minister
David Ben Gurion.
As this government sallies out into terra incognita, the only sure thing is that
four of its new leading lights are sure of what they want - whether their stint
is short or long - and the prime minister will have his work cut out to run them
as a team.
1. Ehud Barak’s successor as defense minister, commando and former chief of
staff Moshe Yaalon: He has won a chance, which any professional soldier must
envy, to remold the Israeli Defense Forces into a national army better suited to
the exigencies of the first half of the 21st century and the wars of the future.
In line with his vision, he would scrap the present structure of corps,
divisions, brigades and battalions in favor of an army based on compact fighting
units – mostly of special forces – each capable of acting autonomously and
independent of other forces.
If Yaalon gets his way, the massive ground forces and heavy theater tanks corps
will be relegated to the past. The air force and navy, with their long range
missiles, submarines and fast assault ships, will no longer be structured as
professional corps but revamped as forces taxed with guarding Israel’s vital
strategic depth by sea and air.
However, Defense Minister Yaalon may not get the time, money or trained manpower
he needs for his program, given the rapid changes overtaking the Middle East and
the advances Iran is making in the pursuit of a nuclear weapon.For US President
Barack Obama, when he comes to Israel for a visit Wednesday, March 20, Yaalon’s
selection as defense minister is not altogether bad news, despite his pessimism
about any dealing with the Palestinians: As Strategic Affairs Minister in the
previous Netanyahu government, he insisted that it was essential for any Israeli
attack on Iran to have the full cooperation of the United States.
2. The former TV anchor Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid – Future) has made his political
debut with a leap to the top government echelon as finance minister and carved
out plum spots for his previously unknown faction members, who are as untried in
government as himself.
They campaigned vigorously for military service for all, including the
ultra-Orthodox and Israeli Arabs, and benefits for the middle class.
Now he must sit down to the forbidding task of drafting the next state budget at
top speed. Netanyahu jokes about heading a provisional administration, whereas
Lapid speaks seriously of the government lasting eighteen months to two years at
most before it falls and an early election which dumps the prime minister of
today and installs him in his place.
This calculus presents the Yesh Atid leader with a dilemma: He could try
designing a popular budget, but then Netanyahu would reap the same benefits as
himself in the coming election. On the other hand, he might decide to prove he
is a statesman and compose a responsibly balanced budget, incorporating
essential spending cuts and painful measures for the very classes he pledged to
promote.
But then, he would be a fool to face the voter precipitately.
His political fortunes in the foreseeable future are therefore tied to those of
the prime minister he aspires to displace, like it or not.
3. Former Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, came in from the political cold to join
the government as Justice Minister claiming that all she really wanted was to
promote and lead peace talks with the Palestinians. This mission is likely to
prove elusive. Not a single Palestinian official of any rank is willing to talk
to her. She would also have to overcome obstacles placed in her path by many of
her new colleagues in cabinet. Such as he next new minister.
4. Naftali Bennett, a software tycoon, was able to revive the fortunes of the
veteran National Religious Party and repackage it as the pro-settlement Habayit
Hayehudi (the Jewish Home). For the horse trading with Netanyahu, he formed an
alliance with Lapid and came away with a fistful of high-wire jobs: minister of
industry, trade and labor, he is also tabbed to head the cabinet committees
charged with finding ways and means of reducing the cost of living and breaking
up the concentration of economic power, and even has also won a coveted place on
the inner security cabinet now pared down from 15 to 7 members.
What Bennett has clearly demonstrated is that he wants a finger in every pie.
Netanyahu has demonstrated a gift for survival in the past. Will it carry him
through his next ordeal?
Iran’s Nuclear Program, a Pawn in a US-Russian Deal
By : Huda Al Hussein/Alsharq Alawsat
Iran left the meeting with the P5+1 group (Britain, China, France, Russia,
United States, plus Germany) in Kazakhstan—which took place in the country’s
former capital Almaty—under the impression that what was offered was both
constructive and pragmatic. Eight months after the Baghdad conference, the P5+1
group acknowledged that it would have to come forth with “acceptable” proposals
based on new grounds, with four prominent points:
Firstly, suspending Iran’s uranium enrichment at the 20 percent level only, as
opposed to the suspension of all enrichment operations, preserving its right to
a 5 percent enrichment level. Secondly, reducing activities in the Fordo
facility and terminating the installation of its centrifuge equipment, instead
of the total closure of the facility as was previously suggested. Thirdly,
transferring the 20 percent enriched uranium to a third party abroad under the
supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), or reprocessing it
to a 5 percent enrichment level and keeping it inside Iran. Fourthly, increasing
the IAEA’s supervision of Iranian nuclear sites.
In return, the group pledged to provide Iran with uranium slides required for
operating the Tehran Nuclear Research Center for medical objectives, and to
refrain from seeking the implementation of new international sanctions. The
pledges also included lifting sanctions imposed on the Iranian gold and jewel
trade as well as on Iranian petrochemicals, and deposing the ban on the purchase
of aircrafts and spare parts to ensure the safety of civil Iranian aviation.
According to an informed Iranian source, Iran is anticipating that the upcoming
expert-level meeting in Istanbul will focus on what is required from Iran and
the returns it will gain. According to Iran, “cooperation must be met with
cooperation.”
On 24 February 2013 the British Daily Telegraph published an article and
satellite images showing steam rising from the Arak heavy water production
plant, indicating that it is ready for operation. The newspaper accused Iran of
attempting to produce the plutonium needed for the construction of a nuclear
bomb.
According to a nuclear expert, although these images have been published
recently they are not new, and the IAEA reports that the heavy water plant has
been functioning for years. Satellite images were used to confirm the status of
operation yet the IAEA stated that “one cannot deduce from these images the
actual amount of heavy water produced”.
The reactor at Arak heavy water production plant is still under construction. It
requires 90 tons of heavy water in order to begin operating, and the Iranians
have yet to attain such a quantity. Fereydoon Abbasi-Davani, the Iranian vice
president and head of Iran’s nuclear program, stated that the reactor will begin
functioning by early 2014. However, according to a former IAEA official, such
optimism is irrelevant in view of the current heavy water production rate, and
especially since the manufacture of 20 percent enriched uranium is yet to begin
at the Isfahan plant, despite the fact that the fundamental elements of uranium
conversion have already been observed there. The nuclear expert added, “we have
to expect the Arak reactor to be a real danger by the second half of 2014, when
the production of plutonium will begin”. It is worth nothing that heavy water
production, the construction of the Arak plant, and the manufacturing of fuel
all are restricted activities for Iran according to the UN Security Council’s
resolutions.
When the plant begins to operate, it is estimated to produce 8 to 12 kilograms
of plutonium annually, providing another means for Iran to acquire nuclear
capabilities. This type of reactor, and volume of plutonium, were used
previously in the Indian CIRUS reactor (providing the uranium for India’s first
nuclear experiment in 1974) as well as in the Pakistani Khushab nuclear complex
(that witnessed an explosion in April 2008 due to a gas leak) in order to
produce heavy water in the Punjab province.
Such reactors are used to produce plutonium for mass-destruction programs, not
for peaceful purposes or as an alternative to the Tehran Nuclear Research
Center, as the Iranians claim. The original Arak plant blueprint contained a
design for a large hot cell, which could isolate plutonium from the fuel in use,
a detail that Iran withdrew later on when questioned by the IAEA about the
actual purpose of such a design.
Nevertheless, according to the nuclear expert, if work commences at the Arak
plant before a political solution with Iran is reached, a problem is bound to
emerge. The international community will then have to deal with this before the
reactor receives the necessary nuclear fuel. In turn, “a schedule must be drawn
up and monitored.”
From its side, Israel senses that diplomatic talks with Iran will be to no avail
and it will find itself forced to prevent Iran—regardless of America’s
standpoint—from producing the plutonium necessary for manufacturing a bomb in
Arak. This would entail a military strike before work commences on the plan, the
same tactic used by Israel with regards to the Osirak plant in Iraq. If the Arak
plant was to start functioning, an assault on it would be extremely dangerous in
terms of the risks of unleashing highly radioactive fuel.
Even if a political settlement is reached with Iran, the international community
must oversee the Arak plant before it receives its first shipment of fuel, even
if under the protection of the IAEA. It is highly probable that Iran will
withdraw from the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons when the
plant is in operation, and so the danger is impending. There are no sufficient
guarantees that this won’t happen under the current regime.
In addition to the Arak plant there is also the Bushehr reactor, control of
which is due to be handed over from Russia to the Iranian authorities this
month. However, the facility is likely to be out of action for two or three
months due to emergency problems with the main power generator.
According to international experts, handing this reactor over to the Iranian
authorities does not mean it will really be in the hands of the Iranians.
Inevitably, Iran will exploit this event to serve its propaganda in the media as
well as in the political sphere. However, the operation of the plant will remain
under the supervision of the Russian administration, given that Iran has signed
three agreements regarding the Bushehr plant for the next two years: One
agreement entitles the Russians to continue operating the plant, a second one
allows them to maintain it, and the third entails providing Iran with expertise
and technical support.
Thus far, the Iranians have refused to sign the Convention on Nuclear Safety.
The reason for this could in fact be political since some Iranian politicians,
in meetings with IAEA officials, have expressed a strong desire to sign the
convention as it will offer them the chance to adopt modern techniques and
methods of nuclear safety, and will entitle them to participate in specialized
courses and conferences. However, the Iranian leadership is still seeking to
maintain its bargaining chips with regards to negotiations over Iran’s nuclear
program. Furthermore, Iran does not want to completely reassure its neighboring
states, claiming that the signing of an early “warning agreement” is more than
enough for now.
It is inevitable that Iran will be part of an anticipated American-Russian and
deal. What about China and North Korea?
UN report reveals Iranian violence against Bahai's
By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL, JERUSALEM POST
CORRESPONDENT03/18/2013/
Research discloses extreme state-sponsored discrimination against minority
community, says Bahai's "systematically deprived."
The Baha'i Shrine of the Bab Photo: The World Baha’i Center BERLIN - Two new
studies have disclosed state-sponsored violence directed at the Bahai religious
minority in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Ahmed Shaheed, UN special rapporteur on human rights in Iran, announced the
findings of his report last week in Geneva. According to his report titled “On
the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Shaheed found
“that 110 Bahais are currently detained in Iran for exercising their faith,
including two women, Mrs. Zohreh Nikayin (Tebyanian) and Mrs. Taraneh Torabi
(Ehsani), who are reportedly nursing infants in prison. It was further estimated
that 133 Bahais are currently awaiting summonses to serve their sentences, and
that another 268 Bahais are reportedly awaiting trial.”
The UN report noted “members of the Bahai community are reported to continue to
be systematically deprived of a range of social and economic rights, including
access to higher education. Informed sources have reported that authorities from
three different universities expelled five Bahai students in November 2012.”
In a second March report issued by the Bahai International Community titled
“Violence with Impunity: Acts of aggression against Iran’s Bahai community,”
persecution between 2005 and 2012 was analyzed. According to the study, “this
persecution has intensified in recent years. Since 2005, more than 660 Bahais
have been arrested, and, by the end of 2012, at least 115 Bahais were
languishing in prison The increase in arrests has been accompanied by a rising
tide of violence against Bahais, marked by incidents that include arson attacks,
anti-Bahai graffiti, hate speech, the desecration of Bahai cemeteries, and
assaults on schoolchildren.”
A leading international expert on the Bahai community in Iran, Dr. Wahied
Wahdat-Hagh, told The Jerusalem Post that the in-depth BIC study is “excellent.”
Wahdat-Hagh, a senior fellow with the European Foundation for Democracy in
Brussels, examined the 45-page BIC report for a series of articles in a German
newspaper. Since Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini seized power in 1979, successive
Islamic administrations have cracked down on the Bahai, Iran’s largest
non-Muslim faith, a peaceful religious community founded by Bahá'u'lláh in Iran
in 1863.
The Bahai religion accepts and recognizes the right and universality of all
religions. There are an estimated 350,OOO Bahai in Iran.
The BIC depicts a systematic form of repression against Bahais in all walks of
life in Iran.
The report states, “In 2007, a 16-year-old Bahai high-school student in a suburb
of Tehran found herself subject to repeated harassment by a group of religious
fanatics who had apparently been monitoring her movements. During November and
December 2007, these anonymous individuals threatened to kill her, made
harassing phone calls, and then one day forced her into a car and assaulted her,
breaking her glasses, before she managed to escape.”The report continued, “In
October-November 2010, more than a dozen Bahai-owned properties were the target
of arson attacks in the city of Rafsanjan.”
The role of Iran’s regime in state-sanctioned violence and judicial indifference
was noted in the BIC report. “Yet many if not most of these attacks bear the
imprint of direct involvement by government agents, or, at least, official
sanction or encouragement. And even if some are the work of ordinary citizens
acting simply out of religious intolerance, there can be little doubt that their
passions were inflamed by official anti-Bahai propaganda, and that they feel
free to act because they have no fear of prosecution or punishment,” wrote the
authors.
The BIC study urged the international community to ramp up the pressure on
Iran’s regime. “History has shown that the only real protection for Iranian
Bahais comes from continued international outcry and action. The last three
decades have proved that Iranian authorities are indeed cognizant of
international opinion and that pressure to meet their obligations under
international human rights law can have an effect.”
High-Ranking Syrian Military Officer Defects
By: Asharq Al-Awsat
In another setback for regime, Al-Assad’s head of logistics defects
Syrians step on a picture of Bashar al-Assad and his father Hafez al-Assad
during a protest marking two years since the start of the uprising, in front of
the Syrian embassy in Amman. (R)
Amman, Asharq Al-Awsat—A high-ranking Syrian military officer and approximately
20 soldiers defected from the embattled Syrian army in two separate incidents on
Saturday.
Appearing in a YouTube Video yesterday, Brigadier General Mohammed Khalouf was
shown dressed in a camouflage military uniform and said he had planned his
escape with the opposition movement for some time.
The video, which could not be independently verified, shows a man with white
hair in civilian clothes getting into a car and a voice off-screen naming him as
General Mohammed Khalouf, head of logistics, who has defected.”
The man speaking in the video says that Khalouf and his family were being
escorted out of Syria on Friday.
Activists said they waited before reporting the defection to ensure that Khalouf
and his family had crossed safely into neighboring Jordan.
There was no comment about the defection on Syrian state news outlets.
Defection of high-ranking military and political figures has slowed in past
months.
However, a study by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS)
published this week estimated that Assad’s forces, thought to be more than
300,000-strong at the start of the uprising two years ago, were now at a much
lower effective strength and were likely to diminish further.
The IISS said that perhaps 50,000 of the Syrian army’s elite troops could be
depended on for loyalty. Most of them were likely to be from Assad’s minority
Alawite sect, which has dominated the country for more than four decades.Many
deserters report that their units were held inside bases to prevent their
escape.
Since the March 2011 start of the conflict between Assad’s regime and rebel
forces, dozens of senior army officers including some 40 generals have defected
and headed to Turkey.
Turkish authorities have refused to give the exact number of Syrian defectors,
who typically join the anti-Assad Free Syrian Army.
Former Syrian premier Riad Hijab defected to Jordan in August 2012.
Syria’s civil war began as a popular street movement but has evolved into an
increasingly sectarian conflict. The opposition has been mostly led by the Sunni
Muslim population, with Alawites and other minorities mostly throwing their
weight behind Assad.