LCCC ENGLISH DAILY
NEWS BULLETIN
January 25/2013
Bible Quotation for today/
A Servant's Duty
Luke 17/ 07-10: "Suppose one of you has a servant who is plowing or looking
after the sheep. When he comes in from the field, do you tell him to hurry along
and eat his meal? Of course not! Instead, you say to him, ‘Get my supper ready,
then put on your apron and wait on me while I eat and drink; after that you may
have your meal.’ The servant does not deserve thanks for obeying orders,
does he? It is the same with you; when you have done all you have been told to
do, say, ‘We are ordinary servants; we have only done our duty."
Latest analysis, editorials, studies,
reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Iranian Media’s ‘Fabrications’/By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed/Asharq
Alawsat/January 25/13
Syria after Brahimi...Another Lebanon/By Joyce Karam/Arabyia/January
25/13
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous
Sources for January 25/13
Fire at liquor store in in the Mount Lebanon
coastal town of Jadra.
Did Hezbollah, Foreign Agents, and Unions
infiltrate the Republican Party?
Arabic paper, Al Hayat: Bulgarians blame Hezbollah
for Burgas
Hezbollah Envoy Opposes Foreign Meddling in Syria
Hezbollah fighting in Syria to help Assad regime,
Times
Canada Urges North Korea to Abandon Nuclear Weapons
Program
Syria's food shortages worsening, UN says
In Syria, Addressing Medical Needs In An Embattled
City
U.S. using Syria to get at Iran, Jumblatt says
Assad joins Damascus prayers, army bombards Homs
Rights group: Syria rebels accused of looting
churches, destroying mosque
Russia: No Plan for Large Evacuation from Syria
Russia Criticizes Syria Rebel 'Obsession' With
Assad Exit
Turkey: World should declare Assad regime's
bombardments in Syria as war ...
Russia's Lavrov says Beirut flights not Syria
evacuation
Syria Unlikely to See Peace in 2013, Says Iran
Diplomat
NATO to activate Turkey's missile system near Syria
border
Syrians Struggle in an Uneasy Lebanon
Lebanon: Two killed in Jbeil’s Lassa in personal
dispute
Lebanese Civil Marriage Couple Stress 'Our
Children Will Choose What They Want'
Al-Mustaqbal, Phalange Hold Intense Meetings on
Electoral Draft-Law
Bassil Lauds Geagea's Stance, Says it is a
'Historic Moment'
Meqdad Denies Death of Abu Ibrahim: Efforts Are
Ongoing to Release Lebanese Pilgrims
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea Stresses
'Nothing Could Separate' him from al-Mustaqbal
Kfar Zebian residents protest against Assir's
trip to Faraya
Clinton forcefully defends handling of Benghazi
attack
Israeli voters force Netanyahu to seek centrist
partner
Netanyahu may keep defense, name Yair Shamir
minister. Lapid - Dep PM + senior cabinet post
Iraq: Sadr Movement Withdraw from Maliki’s
Committee
Egyptian protesters clash with security forces
Tribal movement wins Jordan vote, Islamists to
protest
Fire at liquor store in in the Mount
Lebanon coastal town of Jadra.
January 24, 2013/By Mohammed Zaatari/The Daily Star
JADRA, Lebanon: A fire erupted Thursday morning at a liquor store in the Mount
Lebanon coastal town of Jadra. The fire was extinguished by the Civil Defense
members, but all the merchandise in the shop, owned by Mohammad Ali Hussein, was
destroyed. Security sources told The Daily Star that is not clear yet if the
fire was started by accident or if the shop was targeted. According to the
sources, the public prosecution will task a fire expert to investigate the
incident and determine the cause of the fire. “We can’t confirm yet if the fire
was intended, we will have to wait for the investigations,” the sources said.
Shops selling alcohol are rare in the area, which is located on the southern
coast of Lebanon, and several shops that sell alcohol in the region have been
the target of attacks in the past.
U.S. using Syria to get at Iran, Jumblatt says
January 24, 2013/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: Progressive Socialist Party leader
Walid Jumblatt accused the U.S. of using the Syrian war to exhaust Iran
financially, militarily and politically on the Voice of Russia radio station
Wednesday. He made the comments while in Russia to meet Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov. Jumblatt predicted Syria has a long and turbulent path ahead, expressing
his regret that “several influential countries are contributing to enrage the
war in Syria.”“The Iranian nuclear file will stay at the center of American
interests [in the region] and in Syria the Americans are managing the war to
exhaust Iran,” he said. “Syria must not be turned into a corpse in the
Iranian-American confrontation because Syria is a central ring in the Middle
East and it must be kept unified.”
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea
Stresses 'Nothing Could Separate' him from al-Mustaqbal
Naharnet/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea has reportedly
stressed that “nothing could separate” him from his al-Mustaqbal movement ally
in the March 14 opposition alliance.
“Nothing and no one can separate us and we are keen on our ties with al-Mustaqbal
movement as much as we have keenness on the best representation (guaranteed by)
an electoral draft-law,” Geagea's visitors quoted him as saying.They told An
Nahar daily published Thursday that the LF chief is comfortable to the common
objective of the opposition regardless of the differences between its members on
the draft-law that provides the best representation for the Lebanese. “We won't
argue on seats or posts and the LF doesn't see any future without al-Mustaqbal,”
the visitors quoted him as saying.
They said Geagea had exerted strong efforts for the resumption of the meetings
of the March 14's general-secretariat, which convened on Wednesday following a
several week standstill.
The Christian LF and Phalange parties from the March 14 alliance have announced
their backing to the so-called Orthodox Gathering proposal which envisages
Lebanon a single district and calls for each sect to vote for its MPs in a
propositional representation system. Their Christian rivals from the March 8
allies – the Free Patriotic Movement and the Marada – are already staunch
backers of the proposal.
But al-Mustaqbal has criticized it for harming the social fabric. An Nahar
quoted al-Mustaqbal sources as saying that the opposition was developing ideas
to unify the ranks of the March 14 alliance on the electoral draft-law and
"confront the proposals" of the March 8 majority.
Bassil Lauds Geagea's Stance, Says it
is a 'Historic Moment'
Naharnet/Energy Minister Jebran Bassil lauded Lebanese Forces
chief Samir Geagea's stance in balancing fair representation in the next
parliamentary elections with the problematic issue of disarmament, describing
Geagea's position as “historic.”
“We might have doubted the stances of the Lebanese Forces before, but not
anymore,” said Bassil, a member of the March 8 Free Patriotic Movement, in an
interview to the al-Akhbar daily Thursday.
“We cannot do that today. We must give them credit for backing the Orthodox
Gathering proposal despite those who reject it,” the minister added.
“We cannot but appreciate Geagea's saying that the right representation of all
factions is constitutional and equally important to all other sovereign issues.
We laud his historic stance,” added Bassil.
In an interview to the daily Wednesday, Geagea balanced between his Sunni allies
and Hizbullah saying that “well representation of all factions is as important
as disarmament. Equal representation is the major issue for the Lebanese
Forces.”
The Christian LF and Phalange parties from the March 14 alliance have announced
their backing to the so-called Orthodox Gathering proposal which envisages
Lebanon a single district and calls for each sect to vote for its MPs in a
propositional representation system.
Their Christian rivals from the March 8 allies – the FPM and the Marada – are
already staunch backers of the proposal.
But al-Mustaqbal has criticized it for harming the social fabric.
Bassil stressed that March 8 will reject any electoral law that does not secure
division of powers between Muslims and Christians.
“What we are suggesting is a draft-law that has real division of powers. Those
who reject the Orthodox Proposal would also be rejecting real partnership,” he
said.
Lebanon: Two killed in Jbeil’s Lassa
in personal dispute
Two people were killed on Thursday in the Jbeil
town of Lassa during a personal dispute. The involved parties were residents
from the Kesrouan town of Wata al-Jawz, the National News Agency reported.
The report identified the victims as Ghassan Seifeddine and his son Hady.
Meanwhile, the Lebanese Forces website reported that the assailant, identified
as Anthony Elias Khalil, killed the Seifeddine family members in self-defense.
“Three members of the Seifeddine family were beating Pierre Nakhoul after they
stabbed him with a machete. Anthony Elias Khalil happened to pass by and saw
them beating Nakhoul,” the LF website report stated.
“Khalil stopped his truck and started shouting at the Seifeddines in an attempt
to have them stop. Two of them then attacked Khalil with a machete and a knife.
It was at this point that Khalil took out a gun, shoot the two of them, and
killed them,” the report added. The LF report cited Amz-Mayrouba Road as being
the scene of the crime. “The situation in Lassa is extremely tense. Residents of
the town threatened to exact retribution on the towns of Hrajel, Mayrouba and
Wata al-Jawz,” the LF website report added.
Kfar Zebian residents protest against Assir's trip to Faraya
January 24, 2013/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: Residents of Kfar
Zebian blocked the road leading to Faraya Thursday to protest against a trip by
controversial Salafist Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir to the ski area, security sources
told The Daily Star. The sources said that around 50 people blocked the road of
Kfar Zebian leading to Faraya to protest against the trip. Media reports said
that Assir’s trip was for entertainment. The Army was able to reopen the road
ahead of Assir and his companions, but residents once again attempted to block
the way. The road was finally reopened after the more than a two-hour protest
and Assir was able to make his way to the ski area, along with his supporters.
Interior Minister Marwan Charbel appealed to protesters to clear the way, and
called on them to respect the state and Assir’s right to reach the ski area.
Former Minister Farid Haykal al-Khazen also arrived at the scene and asked
protesters to clear the road. However, Khazen said that Assir’s visit was
suspicious and said he hoped the Sheikh would cut his trip short.
“We don’t want to shove Kesrouan into unwanted conflicts,” said Khazen. Haykal,
a member of the Free Patriotic Movement, said Wednesday he opposes Assir’s visit
to the area and called on him to avoid such trips in the country’s current
circumstances. The Lebanese Forces issued a statement denouncing the attempt to
block Assir’s passage to Kesrouan, arguing that all Lebanese have equal rights
to visit all Lebanese regions.
“The right of Lebanese people with diverse opinions and affiliations is sacred
and there is no justification for blocking roads with fabricated reasons,” said
the statement. The Salafist sheikh earlier told MTV that the Army was working on
reopening the road and said there is no political cover for the protesters who
tried to block his way. Assir also called for self restraint and asked his
supporters to stay in the buses until the road is totally reopened by the Army.
The sheikh headed to the area Thursday morning, along with hundreds of
supporters. They gathered early Thursday morning outside the Bilal Ben Rabah
Mosque in the southern city of Sidon and headed to Faraya in a convoy of more
than a dozen cars and buses. Assir personally supervised the trip’s preparations
in the southern city in the early morning hours. Security measures were enhanced
on the road leading to Faraya in an attempt to secure a safe path for the sheikh
and his supporters.
Arabic paper: Bulgarians blame Hezbollah for Burgas
By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL, JPOST CORRESPONDENT 01/23/2013/ Pan-Arab
paper 'Al-Hayat' reports Bulgaria’s interior minister told EU leaders Hezbollah
had played a role in Burgas suicide bombing. BERLIN – Bulgaria’s interior
minister told European Union leaders last week that Hezbollah had played a role
in the July suicide bombing of an Israeli tour bus, according to a report
Tuesday in pan-Arab paper Al-Hayat.
The bombing in the Bulgarian seaside resort of Burgas resulted in the deaths of
five Israelis and a Bulgarian bus driver.The London-based paper cited an unnamed
“European source” who stated that Bulgarian Interior Minister Tsvetan Tsvetanov
had briefed fellow European interior ministers at a confidential Thursday
meeting.
According to the report, the European source said Tsvetanov had laid out
evidence implicating Hezbollah in the terror attack.
However, Bulgarian Foreign Minister Nikolai Mladenov, who visited Israel last
week, denied that his country’s authorities had concluded their investigation.
Speaking on Monday on Bulgaria’s national channel BNT, he denied a Channel 2
report that his country had presented evidence to Israel showing a link between
Hezbollah and the Burgas killings.
“The reactions in the media were probably because of the political tension in
Israel now before their elections, and also because everybody in Bulgaria,
Europe and Israel impatiently expect the results from the investigation of the
Burgas attack,” he said.
Asked if Hezbollah had been behind the Burgas suicide bombing, Mladenov said,
“No, I have not made any statements for the media, neither before nor during my
trip to Israel. When the Bulgarian investigators, who are working very hard on
the case, complete their work, the truth will have to be announced no matter
what it is.”
One way or another, he added, “the results will be announced in Bulgaria first.
It’s important that the results are announced here, not abroad in Brussels, the
US or Israel.”
According to Al-Hayat’s European source, Germany and France are against
including Hezbollah in the EU terror list because outlawing the Lebanese
organization would create a more volatile Lebanon.
The number of Hezbollah members in Germany has grown from 900 in 2010 to 950 in
2012. With the exception of The Netherlands, the Lebanese group is a legal
organization within the EU, and raises funds in Europe.
Al-Hayat reported that the Bulgarian authorities were slated to hold a press
conference next week to discuss the Burgas investigation. According to the Sofia
News Agency Novinite.com, Bulgarian President Rosen Plevneliev said the terror
attack “will be in the focus of the upcoming sitting of Bulgaria’s Consultative
Council on National Security on February 5.”
English-language Lebanese paper The Daily Star reported on its website Tuesday
that “the Lebanese resistance group has not denied or confirmed any role in the
bombing.”
Hezbollah Envoy Opposes Foreign Meddling in Syria
TEHRAN (FNA)- Hezbollah Member of the Lebanese Parliament Walid
Sukkarieh slammed the world powers for their growing interferences in Syria, and
stressed that the Syrian people are the only ones who are entitled to the right
to determine their fate. Sukkarieh made the remarks in a meeting with Iranian
Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani on the sidelines of the 8th General Assembly
Meeting of the Islamic Inter-Parliamentary Union (IIUP) in Khartoum, Sudan on
Tuesday.
He hoped that the Syrian nation would witness peace as soon as possible,
stressing that no country has right to meddle in internal affairs of Damascus.
Syria has been experiencing unrest since March 2011 with organized attacks by
well-armed gangs against Syrian police forces and border guards being reported
across the country.
The US and its western and regional allies have long sought to topple Assad and
his ruling system. Media reports said that the Syrian rebels and terrorist
groups have received significantly more and better weapons in recent weeks, a
crime paid for by the Persian Gulf Arab states and coordinated by the United
States.
The US daily, Washington Post, reported in May that the Syrian rebels and
terrorist groups battling the President Bashar al-Assad's government have
received significantly more and better weapons in recent weeks, a crime paid for
by the Persian Gulf Arab states and coordinated by the United States.
The newspaper, quoting opposition activists and US and foreign officials,
reported that Obama administration officials emphasized the administration has
expanded contacts with opposition military forces to provide the Persian Gulf
nations with assessments of rebel credibility and command-and-control
infrastructure.
Opposition activists who several months ago said the rebels were running out of
ammunition said in May that the flow of weapons - most bought on the black
market in neighboring countries or from elements of the Syrian military in the
past - has significantly increased after a decision by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and
other Persian Gulf states to provide millions of dollars in funding each month.
On December 16, the Iranian foreign ministry explained about the contents of a
six-point plan for resolving the problems in Syria, saying stop of violence and
preventing foreign military intervention stand atop the proposal.
According to the foreign ministry, the first step is stopping violence and
preventing military intervention of other countries in the Syrian issue.
The second step is preventing the shipment of weapons and holding national
talks. Setting up a committee of the representatives of the Syrian people and
government to reach an agreement on necessary reforms, taking steps to hold
elections, reforming the Constitution as well as holding parliamentary and
presidential elections are among the other moves demanded by the Iranian
proposal.
The Islamic Republic of Iran, which is a staunch supporter of the establishment
of security and stability in Syria, has practically made a series of moves in
the same regard, including its recent call for ceasefire which was staged in
Syria in October, and the holding of the Syrian National Dialogue conference in
Tehran between the Syrian opposition and government in November.
Over 200 Syrian religious and political figures, leaders of tribes and parties
as well as representatives and leaders of the opposition groups joined the
two-day meeting in Tehran at the time.
A number of Syrian parliament members as well as senior political figures from
Sudan, Algeria, Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Brazil and Zimbabwe also took part
in the meeting.
Hezbollah fighting in Syria to help Assad regime, Times
January 23, 2013/Yalobnan
Armed with AK47s, sniper rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, the fighters in
the video crouch and open fire as they patrol a war-damaged and abandoned
Damascus district. In their camouflage uniforms, there seems to be little at
first glance to distinguish them from the regime troops pounding rebel forces in
the bloody fight for Syria.
But these men are said to be members of Lebanon’s Hezbollah militant group and
Iraqi Shiites according to a report by the Times. According to the report the
foreign fighters are fighting to help Syrian president Bashar al Assad in
defending the Shiite Shrines in southern Damascus, which underlines the
increasing sectarian nature of the war.
Did Hezbollah, Foreign Agents, and Unions infiltrate the Republican Party?
By: Kerry Patton/Canada Free Press
Republicans are nothing more than Democrats in disguise,” a conservative friend
told me recently. More and more conservatives are displeased with the Republican
Party. Some believe the party has actually been infiltrated by not only left
leaning persons but foreign influencers and Islamists as well.
It’s sad that in today’s political arena, a person cannot present sound critical
questioning to their own party without being castrated. It appears that more and
more self-proclaimed Republicans are playing a game of ad hominem attacks, just
as Democrats do. If conservatives favor a two party system, it’s critical we fix
a very broken Republican Party. The first step could be to begin vetting members
appropriately. This requires asking critical questions and demanding answers.
Bearing Drift: Virginia’s Conservative Voice, an online media platform, recently
published an article titled “Del. David Ramadan Kicks Butt!” The author praised
Delegate Ramadan (R-87th) for his initiative on passing House Bills 1760 and
2120. Everything sounds good so far. But reading comments on the blog revealed a
troubling pattern.
One commenter posed a very simple question. “Who is Imad David Ramadan?” The
question should have been more appropriately presented by asking, “Who is
Lebanese born Imad Afif Ramadan?” Yes, the person we know as “David” Ramadan is
actually a Shi’ite Muslim born in Lebanon with the birth name Imad Afif Ramadan.
What’s interesting is the fact that the same author who wrote Del. David Ramadan
Kicks Butt is the very author who in August of 2011 wrote Questions Swirl Around
David-Imad Ramadan in 87th HOD. This article revealed David Ramadan’s past,
including his ties to Lebanese Intelligence, the fact that he was formerly
married to a Muslim woman who has gone missing, the fact that he filed
bankruptcy, and his breach of the oath of American citizenship by signing a
petition with his two brothers called DEMAND[ING] THE RIGHT TO VOTE AS CITIZENS
OF LEBANON.
Something just doesn’t seem right about the entire debacle surrounding David
Ramadan. Why would any online media outlet expose David Ramadan then months
later do everything in its power to act like they are his best friend?
Let me be very clear. I am not saying one way or another David Ramadan is
aligned with any international terrorist organization nor am I claiming he has
ties to any foreign state. Nor am I claiming the team at Bearing Drift are doing
anything wrong. Maybe they just had a sudden “change of heart.”
Some questions about Ramadan’s past do need answers, however. We the people
deserve those answers without being chastised for posing such questions. And I
promise, I will touch more on Bearing Drift and at least one of its board
members here as well.
Some Republicans may believe Ramadan and Bearing Drift don’t matter so long as
they continue the conservative path. I disagree. The conservative path is not
about lies, deception, and monetary influence. That’s the path of today’s
Republicans and Democrats. Again, I am not saying anyone has lied, deceived, or
uses/ed foreign or domestic monetary value to influence duties. I just want
answers.
We must not allow fellow so-called conservatives to jump on Republican
bandwagons. Remember, through our party’s history, we have had many sell-outs.
It’s time to weed out the fake conservatives wearing a Republican disguise. We
cannot afford for our party to be further infiltrated.
And yes, we conservatives have allowed our party to become infiltrated. Let’s
not forget the case of one Pakistani agent by the name of Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai
who infiltrated our party not long ago in an attempt to influence our elected
officials. The 62 year old Fairfax, VA resident was supported by the Pakistani
ISI—the very organization who many believe supported in the aiding and harboring
of Osama Bin Laden.
If you believe Nabi Fai is the only foreign agent to infiltrate and influence
our party, you are wrong. It happens more often than you could imagine. He just
happened to get caught.
But let’s go back to the comments on the original article posted by Bearing
Drift for a moment.
Another commenter quickly did his best to protect David Ramadan—Brian W.
Schoeneman. Brian never answered questions posed, but rather played a very
politically correct progressive game—attacking a fellow conservative who
initially asked questions about David Ramadan.
Who is Brian W. Schoeneman and why should you care about him? Brian sits on the
board of directors for Bearing Drift. He admits to being friends with Imad Afif
Ramadan. He said, “I know him pretty well. He’s a friend of mine. We ran for
office together. He won, I lost.”
So what, right? Well, let’s take a deeper look at Mr. Schoeneman.
Mr. Schoeneman serves as the political and legislative director for the
Seafarers International Union of North America (SIUNA), the nation’s largest
maritime labor union. You read that correctly. Mr. Schoeneman is a labor union
guy. Take a deep breath. That does not mean he isn’t necessarily a Republican.
Once again, I am reminded of what my buddy recently told me. “Republicans are
nothing more than Democrats in disguise.” Ok, maybe he really isn’t a Democrat
either. Maybe he is just a bit misinformed about infiltration and influence
operations conducted by foreign agents. Then again, that is highly doubtful.
The SIUNA is an affiliate of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of
Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO). Yes, the AFL-CIO is led by Richard Trumka—a
die-hard leftist. Do you believe for one second two of America’s largest labor
organizations would ever allow someone like Mr. Schoenman to serve in such a
critical position? Ever hear of guilt by association?
I hate writing this. I hate knowing many will immediately jump the gun and
believe I am conspiracy theorists, a racist, an Islamaphobe, or a bigot. I am
none of these things.
I am a conservative. I am a real conservative willing to present information to
readers in an attempt to spark heated debate that will question the one party
within our two party system representing conservatives.
We have a choice: allow our Republican party to continue down the wrong path of
corruption, infiltration, and deception, or ask critical questions and expose
critical issues. This should be done in the spirit of attempting to save the
party.
If we do not make any attempt to preserve the true conservative foundation
within the Republican Party, maybe it’s time some of us leave the party itself
and find something that truly represents real conservatives.
I would hate to leave the party and I do not wish to do so, but what other
choice does a person have these days?
We know of foreign influencers who swayed Republican politicians and their
points of view. We know some self-proclaimed Republicans have ties with large
labor unions, which are sworn enemies of the Republican Party and conservative
principles. And now, we must question at least one elected official in Virginia
in an attempt to determine his true background and allegiance. If we cannot
question those we claim to support, then we must question our own values.
Kerry Patton, a combat disabled veteran, is the author of >b>‘Sociocultural
Intelligence: The New Discipline of Intelligence Studies’</b> and the children’s
book ‘American Patriotism. You can follow him on Facebook or at kerry-patton.com.
Canada Urges North Korea to Abandon Nuclear Weapons Program
January 23, 2013 - Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird today issued the
following statement:
“Canada is deeply concerned about North Korea’s missile tests and apparent plan
to conduct more nuclear tests. We urge the regime to abandon any such plans.
“The regime in Pyongyang has repeatedly violated its international obligations
and poses a grave threat to the security and stability of the region, even as
the people of North Korea starve and suffer.
“Further defiance of its non-proliferation obligations will lead to further
consequences: Canada stands ready to work with the international community to
take further measures if the regime continues to demonstrate total disregard for
its people by choosing to fund military and nuclear programs.
“We welcome the United Nations Security Council’s latest sanctions against North
Korea. These have already been imposed under Canadian law.
“Canada urges the regime in North Korea to abandon its reckless nuclear and
missile programs and invest its limited resources in meeting the basic needs of
its people.”
Syria after Brahimi...Another Lebanon?
By Joyce Karam /Al Arabia
U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi’s current mission in Syria has frozen in its tracks
due to the military escalation, the lack of international consensus, and the
belief among both the Syrian regime and the opposition that a military victory
is possible. Nevertheless, the potential failure of Brahimi will drag Syria
further into a protracted civil war before any agreement on a new power
structure can be reached.
Brahimi’s mission
Brahimi, a seasoned diplomat who oversaw key regional crisis from Lebanon to
Afghanistan to Iraq, took the Syria portfolio last August on the premise that he
can find enough international support to end the conflict. That so far has
displaced 600,000 people and taken 60,000 lives. Brahimi’s bet was on closing
the gap between the U.S. and Russia by having them agree on a post-Assad
transition framework, and then pressure the regime in Damascus into accepting
it. Six months later, neither was achieved. The U.S. and Russia are still in
disagreement over the role of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in any future
transition, and the fighting has only raged around the country and the capital.
Brahimi’s repeated trips to Syria faced more scrutiny from the regime, leading
to a verbal confrontation with Assad in their last meeting on December 24th.
Media reports close to the regime indicated that Assad snubbed Brahimi’s request
to transfer his full authority to a transitional government and did not
appreciate the envoy’s voicing doubts about his prospects of running again in
2014. Assad called the meeting to an end after telling Brahimi that he does not
see himself as “a captain of who flees the ship when it starts shaking”.
Opposition divided
The status of the opposition does not help Brahimi’s in his task either. Almost
two years into the conflict, the “National Coalition” -the main political
opposition body - is still struggling to form a transitional government, a key
element to grant it ground access and give it international legitimacy. The
armed opposition, for its part, is also engulfed in its own divisions between
the more radical groups such as Jubhat Nusra, and the more secular units inside
the Free Syria Army. Jubhat Nusra labeled as “terrorist” by the U.S.
administration, has gained ground in the last few months, after carrying key
attacks against the regime in Idlib province and around Damascus.
Lebanonization of Syria?
Brahimi’s biggest hurdle today is the growing confidence in both the regime and
the opposition that each can win and deliver a military knock-out punch to the
other side.
However, and very much like neighboring Lebanon in 1975, Syria is systematically
descending into a civil war. Similar to Beirut then, the grip of the central
government is weakening in Damascus, while new militias are emerging and
exercising control along sectarian and ethnic lines. Pro-regime armed groups
such as Jeysh Shaabi and Shabiha have been acting as regime’s proxies while the
military is stretched thin and fighting on several fronts. In a trend that was
seen in Lebanon as well, the fighting is no more exclusive between the regime
and the opposition. In Aleppo, the Jubhat Nusra rebels have clashed with the
Kurdish (PKK) fighters, who in turn control most of Kurdish areas in the North
after Assad withdrew his forces last June.
The Lebanon-ization of the Syrian conflict is something Brahimi familiar with
and has repeatedly warned against. The envoy brokered the Taif agreement in 1989
which ended the Lebanese civil war after 15 years of fighting, and more than
150,000 deaths. At the core of Taif was a realization among the opposing
Lebanese factions that neither can win, and a new power-sharing agreement is
necessary to come in terms with the changing demographics inside the country.
Regionally, the solid support behind the agreement from key countries such as
Saudi Arabia and Iran facilitated Brahimi’s accomplishment that was also backed
by the United States, right after the cold war.
Unless a regional and international consensus forms around Syria and along with
that a readiness from the fighting factions to look for a real compromise,
Brahimi’s mission is doomed to fail, and Syrians should brace for a long war.
**Joyce Karam is the Washington Correspondent for Al-Hayat Newspaper, an
International Arabic Daily based in London. She has covered American politics
extensively since 2004 with focus on U.S. policy towards the Middle East. Prior
to that, she worked as a Journalist in Lebanon, covering the Post-war situation.
Joyce holds a B.A. in Journalism and an M.A. in International Peace and Conflict
Resolution. Twitter: @Joyce_Karam
Syrians Struggle in an Uneasy Lebanon
The New York Times
AL-MINYA, LEBANON — For Mohammed al-Ahmad and his wife Zuhour, this is the
second cold, wet winter of the war. They passed the first in the Bab Amr
district of Homs, a onetime rebel stronghold that was taken back by government
forces last February, after a long and unrelenting siege. Much of the
neighborhood was destroyed. They have no home to go back to.
This winter they are living in a soaked field some kilometers north of Tripoli,
Lebanon’s second-largest city. The unofficial refugee camp here is home to more
than 100. The mud in the narrow paths between tents is ankle-deep at spots and
sticks to everything.
Inside Mohammed and Zuhour’s small tent, there is little respite from the
harshness of life outside. In one corner, scraps of damp, moldy bread lie in a
pile.
The roof, punched with holes, is not waterproof and offered little protection
from the rain and sleet of the fierce storms this month. The tent flooded and
water soaked their small stock of food.
Two of their five children lie on thin mattresses on the floor, tucked under
blankets. They are still and quiet save for the sudden fits of coughing, an
increasingly common sound in settlements like this. A third child, awake, has no
coat or winter clothing. Zuhour is pregnant: Another child will soon be living
in this flimsy shelter.
At the most recent count, there were 212,000 refugees in Lebanon, registered or
awaiting registration with the United Nations refugee agency. A year ago, the
agency had registered 5,000. The increase mirrors the intensification of a
conflict across the border that the United Nations says has now killed 60,000.
In a report released this month, the International Rescue Committee, a crisis
relief organization, characterized the situation of the 600,000 Syrian refugees
spread across the region as a “deepening humanitarian disaster.” The millions
more displaced inside Syria are “in desperate need and have little if any access
to humanitarian relief,” it said.
According to the U.N.’s figures, Lebanon has taken in more refugees than any of
Syria’s other neighbors. Unlike other countries hosting refugees though, it does
not have any official refugee camps.
Camps are a “last resort,” said Ninette Kelley, the most senior representative
of the U.N. refugee agency in Lebanon. Still, there is a “need to plan for camps
in the event of a mass influx or in the event that local solutions are
completely overwhelmed,” she added.
For now, the Lebanese government has no plans for camps, but Wael Abou Faour,
the country’s minister of social affairs, conceded that may have to change: “I
think that sooner or later we will have to go to camps because we are
overstretched,” he said.
In the absence of official camps, unofficial ones are absorbing the rising flood
of refugees into the country. Across Lebanon, tents are rigged between
buildings, along the edges of highways and in vacant plots and fields.
In some areas close to the border, refugees squat in houses abandoned by the
Lebanese who have fled the shelling and gunfire coming from Syria. In small
apartments in cities, refugees sleep two to a bed to keep rents affordable.
Without guaranteed shelter and with limited aid, many new arrivals say the basic
cost of survival is their biggest challenge.
“We are living in a very desperate situation right now,” said Hassan Ali Afeer,
30, a refugee near the Syrian border in the Bekaa Valley town of Arsal. “We are
barely living.”
Mr. Afeer’s situation is better than that of many. On a promontory on the edge
of Arsal, a local official has donated a plot of land near a mosque where some
refugees had been seeking shelter. Islamic charities have pitched in and built
concrete huts for 45 families. They are cold, the roofs leak and supplies are
scarce: but at least Mr. Afeer and the others living there pay no rent.
In contrast the landowner of the muddy camp in al-Minya charges refugees like
Mohammed and Zuhour a monthly rent of $66 for their tent. It is cheaper than
renting an apartment, but many struggle to pay even that much in this
impoverished part of Lebanon — where work is hard to find for local people, let
alone refugees.
Mohammed and Zuhour, like many others, cannot register with the U.N. refugee
agency — an inability which limits the aid they can receive.
“We don’t have our family’s papers, we lost them in the shelling,” said
27-year-old Zuhour. “If we could register we would.”
Refugees are dispersed over 700 municipalities in Lebanon, according to the
United Nations, and many are in hard-to-reach places, making aid distribution an
uphill battle. In a country hindered by its own conflicts, where the government
is often seen as unable to provide basic services for its own citizens, refugee
support falls mostly on the shoulders of international and local aid
organizations.
“Given the size of this country, the amount it has taken on and has had to cope
with, given its own political and economic fragility, is truly outstanding,”
said Ms. Kelley, the U.N. refugee agency representative.
Proportionally, she noted, the 212,000 refugees counted in Lebanon, which has a
population of just four million, would be like having 15 million refugees in the
United States. “If you put it in those terms it gives a sense of how weighty it
is on this little country that is half the size of Wales,” she said.
A Lebanese delegation this month appealed to the Arab League in Cairo for $180
million from Arab states to help the country cope with the influx.
If the international community is unable to help Lebanon deal with the crisis,
“we may see greater calls for dissatisfaction and it could become a situation
that would not be as open, as humanitarian as you see today,” Ms. Kelley said.
“The situation is becoming very alarming,” said Mr. Abou Faour, the social
affairs minister. “If you look at the Lebanese resources and our financial
abilities, it’s becoming very alarming.
“It’s becoming a very huge burden on the Lebanese economy, on the security of
Lebanon,” he said.
Beyond the country’s financial and logistic capabilities to handle the refugees,
there are other factors at play that complicate the situation.
There is a carefully maintained sectarian balance in Lebanon that some fear
could be disrupted by large new refugee communities. The country’s experience
with its Palestinian refugee population, segments of which played a major role
in Lebanon’s civil war, has made many apprehensive of refugee communities.
“No one is talking about that, but everyone is being concerned about that, that
you are having a new balance,” said Mr. Abou Faour.
As of December, 97 percent of registered Syrian refugees in Lebanon were Sunni
Muslims, according to U.N. statistics. Most, conscious of the country’s
sectarian divide and some fearing a potential outbreak of hostilities here, have
opted to live in Sunni-majority areas.
The war in Syria has deepened tensions here, with several outbursts of violence
in the past year directly related to the conflict.
There is a danger, as refugees weigh more heavily on Lebanon, that the issue
could become politicized and that the refugees could be dragged into Lebanon’s
own conflicts.
Gebran Bassil, Lebanon’s energy minister, and son-in-law of the leader of the
Free Patriotic Movement, Michel Aoun, has called for the borders to be closed to
refugees, claiming that extremist elements are among those who have fled from
Syria. Others, meanwhile, including the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, have
warned against politicizing the situation and called for the crisis to be
treated as a humanitarian issue.
For many refugees though, thoughts are on more immediate matters, like getting
enough money to eat and keep roofs over their heads.
Ahmed, 17, who did not want to disclose his last name, has resorted to leaving
the camp in al-Minya to beg outside a nearby mosque on Fridays.
Syrian beggars are now a common sight in northern Lebanon and are viewed as an
annoyance by many. Ahmed’s begging mostly yields sparse returns as he gets
shooed away and cursed by the people he importunes.
“You have no dignity as a Syrian in Lebanon,” he said. “You get treated like
this.” He took a drag from an imaginary cigarette, tossed it between puddles and
stomped it out with his foot.
Iranian Media’s ‘Fabrications’
By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Alawsat
Saad El-Katatni, a senior Muslim Brotherhood member and former speaker of the
Egyptian parliament, has denied a story recently reported by the Iranian network
Press TV about him meeting with the Iranian speaker of the parliament Ali
Larijani in Sudan, affirming that he never travelled to Sudan in the first
place.
Several Brotherhood members in Egypt also rushed to deny the story. This
demonstrates the Egyptian government’s anger towards Iran’s fabrications, which
were apparently meant to undermine Egyptian president Mohammed Mursi’s visit to
Saudi Arabia to participate in the Arab economic summit.
There are several stories, all of which could in fact be fabricated, about
meetings between Brotherhood members and Iranian officials. We all remember the
false Mursi interview that was published in the Iranian official press. Yet what
is really worth our attention here is the mysterious relationship between the
Brotherhood and Iran; who is using who and why. It is easy to deny a report or
claim an interview or meeting was fabricated, but the official invitation
extended by President Mursi to his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a
true story. This means after all that both countries enjoy a close relationship,
and reinforces the suspicion that the Muslim Brotherhood has strong ties with
Iran, although the validity of this assumption remains to be seen. Some Iranians
want to see Mursi’s government besieged on the Arab level so that Egypt becomes
a close ally to Iran and an alternative to Bashar Al-Assad’s collapsing regime.
Meanwhile, some Brotherhood members in Egypt want to blackmail and intimidate
Arab countries, especially in the Gulf region, to obtain political, partisan,
and financial support. The second camp is represented by some Brotherhood
writers who call for rapprochement with Iran under the pretext that Gulf
countries do not support the Brotherhood’s rule, with the exception of Qatar,
which is on good terms with Tehran. However, I do not think this latter camp
distinguishes between media tampering and the official political strategy of a
state.
It will not be easy for Mursi’s government, or any other Egyptian government for
that matter, to forge an alliance with Iran unless it decides to drag Egypt into
a series of domestic problems. Egypt gets one third of its remittances from the
Gulf, not from Iran, and its international value is derived from its positive
role in the region, not the other way round.
It seems unlikely that the Muslim Brotherhood would choose to risk the interests
of their people in return for changing the political map. If this happens, it
would be a totally different story.
Whether the Iranians are trying to undermine Mursi’s relationship with Saudi
Arabia and the rest of the Gulf region or the Muslim Brotherhood are using the
Iranian scarecrow to get closer to the Gulf, there are core issues that will
become clear on both sides. These will not be revealed through press reports,
but rather through the actions of the new Egyptian regime. They will be
demonstrated in the Egyptian government’s relationship with senior officials in
Iran, the nature of the deals they strike together, as well as any Brotherhood
interventions or conspiracies in the Gulf states.
The most serious obstacle to hamper the relationship between Mursi’s government,
the Gulf, and Iran would be dual policies, in other words when the statements
and actions of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt do not to represent Mursi and his
government. Yet this would be hard to believe because after all this is a
Brotherhood government, and even if negative statements are sometimes issued
they are attributed to other names.
Netanyahu may keep defense, name Yair Shamir minister.
Lapid - Dep PM + senior cabinet post
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 23, 2013/Israel politics are in for a major
shakeup. New faces will dominate the next cabinet under Binyamin Netanyahu,
while 52 of the 19th Knesset members are new and more youthful faces. Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is pondering keeping responsibility for defense
while naming Yair Shamir (No. 2 in Likud’s partner Israeli Beitenu) minister for
running the defense ministry, debkafile discloses. This would upset outgoing
Vice Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon’s expectation of defense in the post-election
Netanyahu government.
Since the results of Israel’s general election of Tuesday, Jan. 22, were out,
Netanyahu (whose Likud-Beitenu garnered only 31 seats) has been locked in
intensive negotiations with Yair Lapid, whose party came second with a stunning
19 seats, on the shape of the next government. They have also discussed inviting
retired defense minister Ehud Barak to stay on as a non-political expert.
For now, debkafile reports, Lapid who is in a position to pick and choose the
cabinet post he wants, has turned down the post of finance minister for himself,
while admitting to his friends that he wouldn’t say no to the foreign ministry.
Upon hearing this, ex-Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, said cynically
Wednesday that the finance ministry was right down Lapid’s street in view of the
strong social and economic agenda to which he committed his Future party. His
party might resent his abdication of those goals, Lieberman commented.
Wednesday night, Lapid himself put paid to a chorus led by Labor’s Shelley
Yacimovitch for his Future to join the left-of-center and the Arab parties to
block Netanyahu’s efforts to build a coalition government.
Instead, he welcomed Binyamin Netanyahu as next prime minister. “I was glad to
hear Netanyahu referring to all the things I have been aiming for,” he said to
reporters. There will be no opposition bloc - certainly not with Hanan Zouabi,”
said Lapid.
Netanyahu, speaking after the elections, spoke favorably of some of the
objectives Lapid’s Future had set itself: Starting with averting the Iranian
nuclear threat, he went on to speak of equalizing the burden between the secular
and ultra-religious communities, bringing down prices, providing affordable
housing and reforming the system of government.
Lapid refrained from answering when he was asked whether he would serve in the
same cabinet as the ultra-religious Shas party (11 seats), which is a
longstanding coalition partner of Likud and with which Netanyahu conducted
separate negotiations Wednesday.
This dual track opened up the possibility of establishing a government led by
Netanyahu and Lapid in two stages: In the first, this duo would be joined by the
pro-settlement Jewish Home and its head, the high-tech millionaire Naftali
Bennett (11) and Kadima led by Shaul Mofaz, which Wednesday night was poised to
scrape past the threshold with two seats. This setup would command a slim
majority of 63, enough to get the 2013-2014 state budget passed by the new
Knesset. This task defeated the outgoing government because some of its
provisions were unacceptable to Shas and so triggered the early election.
After that, Shas would be invited to join the government on the basis of the
guidelines established in stage one, and expand its parliamentary majority to
75. With Torah Judaism (7) aboard too, the third Netanyahu government would
command a comfortable 82
Bennet expects his Jewish Home party to win a twelfth seat when the army ballots
are counted before official election results are released Thursday. He would be
strongly in line for one of the economic portfolios in the new government,
commerce and industry, for instance, or even finance.
Tzipi Livni, whose Hatenuah Party fell far short of her expectations and wound
up with 6 seats, has been after Lapid to set up a joint front for the cabinet
negotiations with Netanyahu. She anticipates his gaining the post of acting or
vice prime minister plus a key cabinet post. She would then walk through the
door to her former post as foreign minister, or so she hopes.
The Future party leader and the incoming prime minister have not commented on
this plan
Sadr Movement Withdraw from Maliki’s Committee
By Hamza Mustafa
Baghdad, Asharq Al-Awsat—Sadr movement leader, Moqtada al-Sadr, struck a fatal
blow to the seven-member committee tasked by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malik
to consider the demands of protesters, announcing the withdrawal of all Sadr
movement trend ministers from this commission. This committee is headed by Iraqi
Deputy Prime Minister for Energy and senior member of al-Maliki’s State of Law
coalition Hussein al-Shahristani.
Speaking during a press conference held at the Sadrist headquarters yesterday,
spokesman Sheikh Salah al-Obeidi said, “The seven-member committee—formed by the
government to look at the demands of the protesters—has yet to take any
practical decisions to contribute to resolving these demands in the correct
manner.”
He added that, “The solutions put forward by the seven-member committee do not
meet the size of the growing crisis in the country, in addition to failing to be
aware of all the necessary operational aspects to resolve this.”
Obeidi indicated that, “Political bickering has dominated the work of the blocs
during the current period, which hampered the efforts to resolve this issue in
the correct manner.”
“Failure to listen to the view of the religious authorities worsened the protest
crisis, particularly as they aimed to resolve this from the outset.” The Sadr
movement spokesman added.
For his part, Sadr MP Mohamed Rida al-Khafaji, informed Asharq Al-Awsat, that
Maliki, “is not serious about finding real solutions to the protesters’ demands,
and if the religious authorities had not intervened he would have been able to
transgress further, particularly as parties close to him had already begun to
incite the street and play on sectarian tensions.”
“Since the beginning of the crisis the Sadr movement has taken the initiative to
meet the protesters demands, the majority of which we view as being legitimate.”
Khafaji said.
MP Khafaji also revealed that, “Sadr sent delegations to these governorates and
these delegations returned with demands and these were raised to parliament and
the government, while he also asked the prime minister to send an Islamic Dawa
Party delegation to receive the protesters demands, however Maliki refused and
rather than going to the people directly in his position as prime minister of
Iraq, he began to make attempts to move the street and form a committee that has
yet to do anything to meet the people’s demands.”
“The Sadrists will not be a party to this process of procrastination and
stalling, particularly as we informed Maliki from the outset that the demands of
the protesters are legitimate, their protests are spontaneous, and they do not
have a unified leadership or demands.” He added.
The MP also informed Asharq Al-Awsat that, “We also warned against betting on
the time factor because this is not in Maliki’s favor, we said that continuing
this process of procrastination will raise the ceiling of demands and open the
door to foreign interference and agendas.”
Khafaji clarified that “This dismissive dealing with the crisis forced the
religious authorities to intervene . . . therefore we are withdrawing from the
seven-member committee because we are not prepared to betray the religious
authorities and because Maliki has made a critical mistake. He must reform his
practices which are not in line with being the leader of everybody in the
country, rather than in the interests of one party against another. They are all
our people and their demands should be met.”
Iraq’s protesters welcomed the move taken by the Sadr movement to withdraw from
the seven-member committee. Chairman of the Anbar tribes, Sheikh Humaid al-Shoka
told Asharq Al-Awsat “The protesters demands are crystal clear and this does not
require committees but serious measures to implement these.”
He stressed, “Since the outset we said that if the government was serious it
would have begun immediate implementation of the majority of the demands that
fall under its authority.”
Sheikh Shoka also asserted that “The step taken by Sadr to withdraw his
ministers from this committee is a courageous one and demonstrates a sound view
of this position. More importantly, it confirms our convictions that some
parties are trying to play on sectarian tensions at a time when religious
leaders are making courageous statements, particularly the religious authorities
in Najaf as well as religious leaders like Sayyid Sadr and Sayyid (Ammar)
al-Hakim, as well as what we are hearing from out tribal cousins in central and
southern Iraq who understand the legitimacy of our demands.”
In other news, Iyad Allawi’s Iraqiya bloc announced that its ministers would
continue to boycott cabinet meetings, adding that it is considering taking new
positions should the government’s policy of stalling and procrastination should
continue. Iraqiya bloc MP Talal Zobaie told Asharq Al-Awsat, “The Iraqiya bloc
continues to be of the view that the issue can be resolved by dealing with the
protesters directly, rather than through the formation of committees and the
like.”
He added, “The continuation of this procrastination and stalling will prompt us
to take other unprecedented actions such as completely withdrawing from the
political process because we cannot bear false witness to a political process
that is failing to seriously deal with the people’s demands.”
MP Zobaie emphasized that, “The best evidence of the lack of seriousness on the
part of the government is the Sadrists’ decision to withdraw their ministers”
adding “they are partners in the National Alliance that includes Prime Minister
Nouri al-Maliki.”
Answering a question regarding the protesters’ refusing to deal with
politicians, including Iraqiya bloc members, and whether there is any point in
the Sadrists withdrawing under such circumstances, Zobaie said, “The protesters
have every right to say this because they have truly gone to hell and back
thanks to the politicians, however our position reflects our own view,
particularly as we are a part of the Iraqi people and we must bear
responsibility to history regarding what is happening.”