LCCC ENGLISH DAILY
NEWS BULLETIN
August 20/2013
Bible/Faith/Quotation for today/Wives
and Husbands
Ephesians 05 /21-33:
"Submit yourselves to one another
because of your reverence for Christ. Wives, submit
yourselves to your husbands as to the Lord. For a
husband has authority over his wife just as Christ has
authority over the church; and Christ is himself the
Savior of the church, his body. And so wives must
submit themselves completely to their husbands just as
the church submits itself to Christ.
Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the
church and gave his life for it. He did this to
dedicate the church to God by his word, after making it
clean by washing it in water, in order to present
the church to himself in all its beauty—pure and
faultless, without spot or wrinkle or any other
imperfection. Men ought to love their wives just
as they love their own bodies. A man who loves his wife
loves himself. None of us ever hate our own bodies.
Instead, we feed them, and take care of them, just as
Christ does the church; for we are members of his
body. As the scripture says, “For this reason a
man will leave his father and mother and unite with his
wife, and the two will become one.” There is a
deep secret truth revealed in this scripture, which I
understand as applying to Christ and the church. 33 But
it also applies to you: every husband must love his wife
as himself, and every wife must respect her husband.
Latest analysis, editorials, studies,
reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Responsibility For The
Dahieh Bombing/By: Elias Harfoush/Al Hayat/August 20/13
Washington’s Disappointment
in Egypt/By: Mostafa Zein/Al Hayat/August 20/13
Why is the West bowing
before the Brotherhood/By: Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed/Asharq
Alawsat/August 20/13
King Abdullah’s Egypt speech
was like a surgeon’s scalpel/By: Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq
Alawsat/August
20/13
Behind Benghazi: Muslim
Brotherhood and Obama Administration/by Raymond
Ibrahim/CBN News/August 20/13
Audio/Dr. Walid Phares: Muslim
Brotherhood has moved from Protests to Jihadi
Insurgency/by Dr. Walid Phares/Auguust 20/13
The State’s Authority Lasts
Most/By: Mohammad el Ashab/Al Hayat/August
20/13
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources/August 20/13
Arab states ready to cover any
cuts in aid to Egypt: Saudi Arabia
Israel stays clear of Egyptian
crisis, fearing Russian military’s return to a second
border after Syria
Israeli MK and Former DM,
Binyamin Ben-Eliezer: Sisi is preventing Egypt from
turning into Iran
Suleiman Cancels Vacation after
Receiving 'Worrying Information' on Security Situation
Geagea Urges Suleiman, Salam to
Swiftly Form Cabinet
No Casualties as Five Rockets
Hit Hermel, al-Qaa
Aoun says differences with
Hezbollah persist
Prime Minister-designate Tammam
Salam: Political Powers Don't Have the Intention to
Facilitate Formation of Govt.
Military Court Judge Sami Sader
Hands over 13 Bodies of Ruwais Blast Victims to
Relatives
Suleiman Tasks Army to
Determine Location from where Rockets that Landed in
Hermel Were Fired
Huge Blaze Erupts at Carton
Factory in Bikfaya
Judge Interrogates 3 Detainees
Charged with Belonging to an 'Armed Terrorist'
Organization
Abou Faour, Taymour Jumblat
Return to Lebanon after Meeting Saudi Intelligence Chief
Head of ICRC in Lebanon Hopes
Red Cross Will Continue to Aid Syrian Refugees
Hizbullah Commander Killed near
Damascus
Report: Turkish Pilot Refuses
to Fly to Beirut in Protest
Report: Tuesday's Parliamentary
Session to Be Postponed to Avoid Further Tensions
Report: Al-Asir Supporter
Involved in the Naameh Car Bombing Ring
Miqati, Davutoglu to Continue
Consultations over Release of Pilots, Aazaz Pilgrims
Egypt's Catholics Denounce
'Terrorist' Violence
Amnesty Denounces 'Utter
Carnage' in Egypt
Saudi PM: Arabs Ready to Cover
Cuts in Foreign Aid to Egypt
Egypt's Mubarak Cleared in
Case, Held on Remaining Charge
Report: Kuwait to Deport 9
Egyptian pro-Morsi Protesters
Russia, U.S. to Discuss Syria
Next Week
Jordan's PM Says U.S. Helping
Amman Deal with Possible Syria Chemical Threat
Iraq Executes 17 People Charged
with Terrorism
Barzani calls on Syrian Kurds
to stay and fight
Canada Concerned by Arrest of
Two Canadians in Egypt
Report: Al-Qaida 'Targeting
European Rail Network'
Egypt Closes Rafah Crossing
after Sinai Attack
Report: Al-Qaida 'Targeting European Rail Network'
Naharnet /Al-Qaida is plotting attacks on Europe's
high-speed rail network, German mass circulation daily
Bild reported on Monday, citing intelligence sources.
The extremist group could plant explosives on trains and
tunnels or sabotage tracks and electrical cabling, said
Bild, Europe's most widely read daily. Bild said the
information came from the National Security Agency (NSA)
in the United States, which had listened in to a
conference call involving top al-Qaida operatives. The
attacks on Europe's rail network was a "central topic"
of this call, Bild said. Authorities in Germany have
responded to the threat with discrete measures such as
deploying plain-clothed police officers at key stations
and on main routes, according to the daily. According to
US media reports, intelligence services intercepted a
conference call earlier this month between al-Qaida
leader Ayman al-Zawahiri and more than 20 operatives
from across the group's global network. This prompted
the US and several allies to shut embassies across the
Muslim world, fearful of a major attack. On August 1,
the US issued a worldwide alert, warning of al-Qaida
plans to launch an attack in the Middle East or North
Africa. Source/Agence France Presse.
Geagea Urges Suleiman, Salam to Swiftly Form Cabinet
Naharnet/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea called on
Monday President Michel Suleiman and Tammam Salam to
swiftly end the cabinet formation process, pointing out
that the matter hasn't reached a deadlock yet. “Those
who are concerned with the matter, including Suleiman
and Salam, are exerting efforts to form the government
as soon as possible,” Geagea said in comments published
in An Nahar newspaper.
He pointed out that forming the cabinet according to the
parliamentary seizes is “unconstitutional.”Prime
Minister-designate Tammam Salam is seeking the formation
of a 24-member cabinet in which the March 8, March 14
and the centrists camps would each get eight ministers
and rejects to grant the veto power to any side. The
March 8 alliance has meanwhile been demanding that it
granted veto power in a new cabinet.
While the March 14 coalition is calling for keeping
Hizbullah away from the cabinet lineup over its role in
Syria's war. “The Lebanese have to say their word and
resume dialogue and reach consensus over the formation
of the cabinet,” Geagea said.
Abou Faour, Taymour Jumblat Return to Lebanon after
Meeting Saudi Intelligence Chief
Naharnet /Caretaker Social Affairs Minister Wael Abou
Faour and son of Progressive Socialist Party chief Walid
Jumblat, Taymour, returned to Lebanon on Monday after a
trip to Saudi Arabia that lasted several days, reported
the National News Agency. It revealed that they had held
talks in the kingdom with head of Saudi Intelligence
Prince Bandar bin Sultan on the situation in Lebanon and
the region.
“Several political issues were addressed during this
critical time that the Arab world, especially Lebanon,
is passing through,” it added. The two sides also
stressed the good ties between the PSP chief with Saudi
Arabia.
Jumblat expressed his appreciation for the role the
kingdom is playing in supporting Lebanon and protecting
its security, said NNA. Media reports last week said
Abou Faour and Taymour Jumblat's talks will focus on the
formation of a new government. The two officials had
arrived in Saudi Arabia on August 12.
Report: Tuesday's Parliamentary Session to Be Postponed
to Avoid Further Tensions
Naharnet /A parliamentary session aimed at discussing a
number of draft-laws is expected to be postponed for the
fourth time on Tuesday, reported the pan-Arab daily al-Hayat
on Monday. It said that Speaker Nabih Berri is likely to
postpone the two-day session in order to avoid further
tensions in Lebanon in light of the ongoing political
disputes and security unrest. Parliamentary sources
explained that Berri “does not want to jeopardize the
last chance for political parties to convene and
communicate and he will therefore not hesitate to
postpone Tuesday's session.” Al-Hayat revealed that he
had held separate talks with caretaker Prime Minister
Najib Miqati and head of the Mustaqbal bloc MP Fouad
Saniora about postponing the session before Thursday's
Ruwais bombing in Beirut's southern suburbs of Dahieh
had taken place. The session was postponed for a third
time on July 29 over a lack of quorum. Several
parliamentary blocks boycotted the parliamentary session
over a dispute with the speaker over its agenda, which
included 45 articles. Berri insists on keeping the 45
draft-laws on the agenda intact and had previously vowed
to continue to call on MPs to a General Assembly meeting
until the agenda is discussed. Miqati argues that there
is no balance between the powers of the legislative and
executive branches amid a resigned government. Miqati
and the March 14 alliance say that the agenda's articles
should be limited to one draft-law, which is extending
Army Commander General Jean Qahwaji's mandate. Qahwaji's
term ends in September when he turns 60.
Head of ICRC in Lebanon Hopes Red
Cross Will Continue to Aid Syrian Refugees
Naharnet/Head of the delegation of the
International Committee of the Red Cross in Lebanon,
Jurg Montani hoped that the committee will continue to
provide Syrian refugees flowing into the country with
the necessary aid that it has been providing for the
past two years. He said at the end of his two-and-a-half
year mandate to Lebanon: “The Lebanese government has
been exemplary in keeping its border open and hosting
the refugees.”He noted however that the growing number
of refugees requires new ways to deal with the impact
they are having in Lebanon on various levels. He
wondered whether the relief facilitated by the
government will be enough, saying that only time will
provide the answers. Montani remarked however that there
will always be shortcomings in dealing with this file,
hailing the state in managing to cope with their burden
in an exemplary manner despite its late response.
Moreover, he said that Lebanon had adopted stricter
border control measures regarding the flow of Syrians,
but added that it is too soon to tell whether that will
have an impact on the humanitarian level.
“Legally, any country has the right to control its
borders,” he remarked. He said that the situation of
Syrian refugees in Lebanon was different when he first
assumed his position at the head of the delegation of
the ICRC, saying that their numbers at the time only
reached 10,000, while they have now spiraled to 700,000
without counting the Palestinian refugees that have fled
the conflict.
Among other things, the ICRC was concerned with
providing them with proper healthcare services, he said,
while remarking that the committee plays a subsidiary
role to that of the Lebanese government and United
Nations Higher Commission on Refugees. Moreover, he said
that the ICRC's role has not been limited to tackling
the case of Syrian refugees, but it has also been
addressing that of detentions in Lebanon, starting with
Roumieh Prison.
The committee has been successful in providing prisoners
at Lebanon's largest jail with access to proper
healthcare and its example will be adopted at all other
prisons, Montani stressed.
In addition, it has continued its efforts regarding the
Lebanese held in Syrian jails and who have been missing
since the beginning of the Civil War in 1975.
The ICRC has been helping the families determine the
fate of their loved ones since the outbreak of the war,
he said. “The number one priority is to find out whether
the prisoners are still alive,” he added.
“Enormous challenges are coming to Lebanon and I choose
to be optimistic that it can successfully deal with
them,” he concluded. He will be succeeded by Fabrizio
Carboni. The ICRC is a neutral, impartial and
independent humanitarian organization. It seeks to
preserve a measure of humanity in times of armed
conflict.
Aoun says differences with
Hezbollah persist
August 19, 2013/The Daily Star/BEIRUT: Hezbollah and the
Free Patriotic Movement remain at odds over a number of
local and regional matters including Syria, MP Michel
Aoun said in an interview published over the weekend.
“There are differences [with Hezbollah] over a number of
issues, mainly over establishing the state, democracy,
settling the situation of south Lebanon, the Palestinian
cause and Syria,” Aoun told the pan-Arab Al-Hayat
newspaper. Aoun, who has previously defended Hezbollah’s
military role in Syria, said his FPM opposed any
military intervention in foreign states. “This is an
individual initiative and there is no understanding
between us [over involvement in Syria], and we oppose
intervention outside Lebanese territories,” he said.
“The presence of the resistance in Syria is an
understanding between them and Syria, we are not part of
such an understanding,” Aoun explained.
Aoun also reiterated his willingness to visit Saudi
Arabia and said there were no obstacles preventing the
FPM from opening up to Riyadh. “There are no obstacles
in the essence of the relations with Saudi Arabia, but
there are Lebanese political sides that have imparted
the impression that Gen. Michel Aoun is against Saudi
Arabia,” he said.
“If we review our ties with Saudi Arabia then there are
not barriers between us and Saudi Arabia and this helps
Lebanon to be stable and build a strong Army,” he added.
Aoun said there was nothing preventing him from
accepting a possible invitation to Saudi Arabia.“Why
not, what can impede me?” he asked.
Aoun hinted that former Prime Minister Saad Hariri was
behind the FPM leader’s strained ties with Riyadh but
said the dispute between him and Hariri was now in the
past. “We had a dispute in the past which led us to
resign from his Cabinet and now it is over,” he said.
“If Hariri comes back, this is his country because he is
a political leader and enjoys a [popular] political
presence,” Aoun added.
Ties between the FPM and Saudi Arabia, a major backer of
the March 14 coalition, have been strained over the past
years.
Huge Blaze Erupts at Carton Factory
in Bikfaya
Naharnet/A major blaze broke out Monday
at a carton factory in the Bikfaya area in Northern Metn
and residents voiced fears that the flames might spread
to their homes. "Civil Defense crews are trying to douse
a huge fire that erupted at the Gemayel Carton Factory
in the Bikfaya area," state-run National News Agency
reported. Voice of Lebanon radio (93.3) said more than
five firefighting vehicles were at the scene of the
blaze and that residents demanded the use of a
helicopter to prevent the spread of flames. The
factory's owner, Fadi Gemayel, told the radio station
that the 35,000 square meters facility contains
extremely flammable substances.
Meanwhile, MP Sami Gemayel, who hails from Bikfaya,
telephoned caretaker Interior Minister Marwan Charbel,
asking him to "utilize all the ministry's capabilities
of the ministry, including the Scorsese helicopter, to
contain the fire at the Bikfaya carton factory as soon
as possible." According to Gemayel's press office,
Charbel promised to send "all the necessary support and
reinforcements to put out the fire."The lawmaker also
telephoned caretaker Industry Minister Vrej Saboundjian,
who in turn promised to exert utmost efforts.
No Casualties as Five Rockets Hit
Hermel, al-Qaa
Naharnet/Five rockets landed in and
around the Bekaa town of Hermel, a Hizbullah stronghold,
on Sunday, a security source told Agence France Presse
on condition of anonymity. "Two rockets landed in the
town of Hermel, in an area between the Mabarrat teaching
association and the Masharii al-Qaa area, causing no
casualties," the source said. "Another three rockets
have landed now on the outskirts of Hermel," he added.
It was not immediately clear whether the rockets were
launched from inside Lebanon or from across the border
in strife-torn Syria, said the source, although
state-run National News Agency said they were fired from
Syrian territory. Hermel and other areas of eastern
Lebanon, a bastion of Hizbullah, have been hit by
several rocket attacks launched from Syria in recent
months.
The latest rocket attack comes just three days after a
powerful car bombing in Hizbullah's heartland in
southern Beirut killed 27 people and wounded around 300
others. The toll was the highest since a Beirut car bomb
killed former prime minister Rafik Hariri and 22 others
in February 2005.
"I will go myself to Syria if it is so necessary in the
battle against the Takfiris (radical Sunni Muslims),
Hizbullah and I will go to Syria" to fight rebels trying
to oust the Damascus regime, Hizbullah chief Sayyed
Hassan Nasrallah said in a defiant speech on Friday,
accusing the Takfiris of being behind the deadly blast.
Source/Agence France PresseNaharnet.
Report: Al-Asir Supporter Involved in the Naameh Car
Bombing Ring
Naharnet/Security information revealed on Monday that
some members of the car bombing ring detained on Sunday
are supporters of Islamic cleric Ahmed al-Asir, the As
Safir daily quoted well informed sources on condition of
anonymity. Eight people, of Lebanese and Palestinian
nationalities, were found involved in the scheme to
detonate a booby-trapped car found in Naameh
neighborhood in South of Lebanon in another location,
the source added. The confessions of the car-bombing
ring helped the security agencies seize the Audi vehicle
that was rigged with explosives and was set to be
detonated in another area. Saturday afternoon security
agencies seized the car filled with 250 kilograms of
explosives near the municipality building in Naameh. The
car carried fake license plate numbers and contained
five barrels of TNT, explosive material, fuses and
detonators along with a device to remotely detonate it.
All the people involved in the scheme are under
monitoring, and investigators have circulated their
photos in a bid to tighten their movements, the source
told the daily. The seized car included large quantities
of explosives which leads to the belief that it was to
be used in several bomb attacks in different regions
across Lebanon, the source said. The Naameh plot was to
be the springboard for the attacks, he added. Asir's
supporters opened fire on an army checkpoint, late last
month, leaving around 18 soldiers and more than 20
gunmen dead. The gunbattles concentrated in the area of
Bilal Bin Rabah Mosque and nearby buildings in Abra.
Asir, a 45-year-old cleric who supports the
overwhelmingly Sunni rebels fighting to topple Syrian
President Bashar Assad, is no where to be found.
Prime Minister-designate Tammam
Salam: Political Powers Don't Have the Intention to
Facilitate Formation of Govt.
Naharnet /Prime Minister-designate Tammam
Salam stressed that he is seeking to form a government
that includes all Lebanese factions, saying that he does
not want to eliminate any side from power, reported the
daily An Nahar Monday. He told the daily however that
the developments over the past few months “have
demonstrated that the powers have no intention to
facilitate the formation of the cabinet.” “I will not
take any action that will harm any Lebanese sect or
political party,” he said. “The new government may not
please all sides, but it will not be directed against
any party,” explained the premier-designate. “In the
end, we must assume our responsibilities and we must
form a new government,” Salam stated. “We are awaiting
the right conditions in order to follow through with our
mission,” he added. Salam is seeking the formation of a
24-member cabinet in which the March 8, March 14 and
centrists camps would each get eight ministers. He is
also rejecting granting veto power to any power, which
the March 8 camp has been demanding. The March 14
coalition is meanwhile calling for keeping Hizbullah out
of the cabinet over its role in Syria's war.
Military Court Judge Sami Sader
Hands over 13 Bodies of Ruwais Blast Victims to
Relatives
Naharnet/Military Court Judge Sami Sader
began on Monday handing over the bodies of Beirut's
southern suburbs Ruwais neighborhood blast victims to
their relatives. According to the state-run National
news agency, thirteen identified bodies have been handed
over so far, in addition to the body of a Syrian worker.
The news agency reported that the primary investigations
are ongoing, in particular regarding the BMW car that
was used in the explosion. The Ruwais blast claimed the
lives of 27 people and wounded more than 336 other. The
casualty toll is the highest in Lebanon since a massive
car bomb attack on the Beirut seafront killed former
prime minister Rafik Hariri and 22 others in February
2005. Hizbullah is a key supporter of President Bashar
Assad and has sent fighters across the border to Syria
this year to bolster government forces, which have been
battling a deadly anti-regime revolt since March 2011. A
defiant Nasrallah said on Friday he himself was ready to
go and fight in Syria against radical Islamists, whom he
accused of being responsible for the car bombing.
On Saturday, the Syrian opposition National Coalition
warned against a "cycle of violence" in Lebanon if
Hizbullah continues to send fighters to help the
Damascus regime.
An online video surfaced shortly after the attack
showing three masked men, two of them holding rifles, in
front of a white flag inscribed with the Islamic
profession of faith, claiming the attack.
Report: Turkish Pilot Refuses to
Fly to Beirut in Protest
Naharnet /A Turkish pilot refused to fly
a Beirut-bound plane from Istanbul in a show of protest
against the kidnapping of two of his colleagues in
Lebanon, local media reported Monday. Yilmaz Ozgenturk,
a captain at national carrier Turkish Airlines (THY),
left the cockpit after announcing to passengers in
Turkish and English that he would not fly to Beirut
because he was protesting the abduction, the Milliyet
newspaper reported. The plane eventually took off after
a new pilot was sent. The airline has launched a probe
into the action of the captain, who reportedly said:
"That was my personal choice." On August 9, gunmen
ambushed a bus carrying Turkish Airlines crew from
Beirut's international airport to a hotel in the city,
and snatched its two pilots. A previously unknown group
calling itself Zuwwar Imam al-Rida claimed the
abduction, and demanded that Turkey use its influence
with Syrian rebels it backs to secure the release of
nine Lebanese Shiites kidnapped in Syria in May 2012.
Lebanese authorities have arrested three suspects and
charged them in connection with the abduction. Source/Agence
France Presse.
No Casualties as Five Rockets Hit Hermel, al-Qaa
Naharnet/Five rockets landed in and around the Bekaa
town of Hermel, a Hizbullah stronghold, on Sunday, a
security source told Agence France Presse on condition
of anonymity. "Two rockets landed in the town of Hermel,
in an area between the Mabarrat teaching association and
the Masharii al-Qaa area, causing no casualties," the
source said. "Another three rockets have landed now on
the outskirts of Hermel," he added.
It was not immediately clear whether the rockets were
launched from inside Lebanon or from across the border
in strife-torn Syria, said the source, although
state-run National News Agency said they were fired from
Syrian territory. Hermel and other areas of eastern
Lebanon, a bastion of Hizbullah, have been hit by
several rocket attacks launched from Syria in recent
months. The latest rocket attack comes just three days
after a powerful car bombing in Hizbullah's heartland in
southern Beirut killed 27 people and wounded around 300
others. The toll was the highest since a Beirut car bomb
killed former prime minister Rafik Hariri and 22 others
in February 2005.
"I will go myself to Syria if it is so necessary in the
battle against the Takfiris (radical Sunni Muslims),
Hizbullah and I will go to Syria" to fight rebels trying
to oust the Damascus regime, Hizbullah chief Sayyed
Hassan Nasrallah said in a defiant speech on Friday,
accusing the Takfiris of being behind the deadly
blast.Source/Agence France PresseNaharnet.
Miqati, Davutoglu to Continue
Consultations over Release of Pilots, Aazaz Pilgrims
Naharnet /Caretaker Prime Minister Najib
Miqati agreed with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu to carry on consultations over the safe
release of two Turkish Airlines pilots, media reports
said on Monday.
Miqati stressed during a telephone conversation Sunday
night with Davutoglu that the Lebanese state is fully
carrying out its tasks to swiftly end the case of the
abducted pilots and the remaining nine Lebanese pilgrims
in Syria's Aazaz, As Safir newspaper reported. For his
part, Davutoglu voiced hope that his country would be
able to participate in a positive way to ensure the safe
release of the nine men.
The report pointed out that General Security chief Abbas
Ibrahim is expected to head to Ankara when the
appropriate conditions are available. On August 9,
gunmen ambushed a bus carrying Turkish Airlines crew
from Beirut's international airport to a hotel in the
city, and snatched the pilot and co-pilot. A previously
unknown group calling itself Zuwwar Imam al-Rida claimed
the abduction, and demanded that Turkey use its
influence with Syrian rebels it backs to secure the
release of nine Lebanese kidnapped in Syria in May 2012.
The pilots were seized just outside the airport, in an
area controlled by Hizbullah. However, Hizbullah chief
sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has denied any involvement in
the kidnapping. In May 2012, eleven Lebanese pilgrims
were kidnapped in Syria's Aleppo region as they were
making their way back to Lebanon by land from pilgrimage
from Iran. Two of them have since been released, while
the rest remain held in Aazaz.
King Abdullah’s Egypt speech was like a surgeon’s
scalpel
By: Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Alawsat
In clear and brief words, the Custodian of the Two Holy
Mosques, King Abdullah Bin Abdul-Aziz said: “Let the
entire world know that the people and government of the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia stood and still stand today with
our brothers in Egypt against terrorism, extremism and
sedition, and against whomever is trying to interfere in
Egypt’s internal affairs.”
In saying so, the Saudi king has drawn a clear line for
the international, regional and Arab handling of Egypt.
The historic statement from the King went on to say that
there are those who stand with Egypt and there are
others who are against it, and that Saudi Arabia
declares support for Egypt and the Egyptian people
extremely clearly. The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques
spoke the truth when he described what is happening in
Egypt today as “terrorism, extremism and sedition.”
In keeping with his past statements and actions, the
Saudi King was even clearer when he issued his warning:
“Let it be known to those who interfere in Egypt’s
internal affairs that they themselves are fanning the
fire of sedition and are promoting terrorism, which they
claim to be fighting. I hope they will come to their
senses before it is too late, for the Egypt of Islam,
Arabism, and honorable history will not be altered by
what some may say or what positions others may take.
Egypt will be able, with the grace and might of God, to
pass into the land of safety, and then they will realize
the wrong they committed after it is too late to show
regret.”
The statement is important for many reasons: Saudi
Arabia’s religious, political and economic value, and
also the reputation and weight the Saudi King himself
has in the Arab and Islamic worlds and in the
international community. Indeed, the King’s address was
like the scalpel of a skillful surgeon in an extremely
complex surgery. His aim was to delineate acceptable and
unacceptable actions in handling the situation in Egypt
in light of the Muslim Brotherhood’s terrorism. He has
done this by declaring with utmost clarity that his
country has supported and will continue to support Egypt
and the Egyptian people, by warning against intervention
in Egypt’s internal affairs which, as he said, will
further ignite sedition. The message here is clear both
regionally and internationally, and is directed to
specific countries.
We all saw regional countries acting to declare support
to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosque’s address that
served as a political prop for Egypt and its people and
has put an end to some countries’ overbidding towards
Egypt. King Abdullah’s address has put an end to an
ongoing quarrel, yet there are still some who seek to
complicate the situation through their shallow
understanding and their delusions. There are attempts to
portray what is happening in Egypt as something similar
to what is happening in Syria or in other Arab Spring
states. Several powers and parties are clearly seeking
to support this endeavor through forgery, delusion and
provocation. In his address, the Saudi King was able to
describe the scene with complete clarity and reason. The
historic stance of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is one
of a leader who wants to protect the state against
whomever seeks to destroy it. It is the stance of a
leader who seeks to protect the region against whomever
thinks the violation of its sovereignty is permissible.
King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz’s address is a historic one,
for it will be decisive in understanding what has
happened—and what will happen next.
Israel stays clear of Egyptian crisis, fearing Russian
military’s return to a second border after Syria
DEBKAfile Special Report August 19, 2013/Saudi Arabia
and the United Arab Emirates – not Israel - are lobbying
the West for support of the Egyptian military. Their
campaign is orchestrated by Saudi Director of
Intelligence Prince Bandar Bin Sultan - not an anonymous
senior Israeli official as claimed by the New York
Times, debkafile’s Middle East sources report. The
prince is wielding the Russian threat (Remember the Red
Peril?) as his most potent weapon for pulling Washington
and Brussels behind Egypt’s military chief Gen.
Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi and away from recriminations for
his deadly crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood.
The veteran Saudi diplomat’s message is blunt: Failing a
radical Western about-turn in favor of the Egyptian
military, Cairo will turn to Moscow. In no time, Russian
arms and military experts will again be swarming over
Egypt, 41 years after they were thrown out by the late
president Anwar Sadat in 1972. Implied in Bandar’s
message is the availability of Saudi financing for
Egyptian arms purchases from Moscow. Therefore, if
President Barack Obama yields to pressure and cuts off
military aid to post-coup Cairo, America’s strategic
partnership with this important Arab nation may go by
the board.
It is not clear to what extent Russian President
Vladimir Putin is an active party in the Saudi drive on
behalf of the Egyptian military ruler. On July 31,
during his four-hour meeting with Prince Bandar, he
listened to a Saudi proposition for the two countries to
set up an economic-military-diplomatic partnership as
payment for Russian backing for Cairo.
Last Friday, Aug. 16, Putin convened his elite military
and intelligence chiefs for an extraordinary meeting in
the Kremlin to discuss the Saudi proposition. No
decisions were reported - only a suggestive quote from
Putin saying that the session was called to “discuss the
situation in Egypt and take the necessary steps to the
put Russian military facilities at the Egyptian military
disposal.” He added that “Russia will arrange for joint
military exercises with the Egyptian army.” Both notions
were left dangling without elaboration, a lure without a
commitment.
The New York Times of Sunday and Monday (Aug. 18-19)
pushed an account of Israel’s diplomats suggesting they
were fanning out across Western capitals to urge them to
support Egyptian Defense Minister Gen. El-Sisi despite
his suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood, with the
argument: “At this point, it’s army or anarchy.” This
entire conception doesn’t hold water. From Israel’s
perspective, the Bandar initiative if it takes off would
lead to the undesirable consequence of a Russian
military presence in Egypt as well as Syria. This would
exacerbate an already fragile - if not perilous
situation – closing in on Israel from the south as well
as from the north.
The Israeli and Egyptian armies strictly limit their
cooperation to counterterrorist action in Sinai against
al Qaeda, Salafist and other terrorists threatening both
countries and the Suez Canal international waterway.
Even then, the IDF does not go beyond responding to
Egyptian requests in cases of mutual security concern.
Israel has absolutely no involvement in Gen. El-Sisi’s
war on the Muslim Brotherhood.
On the diplomatic front, Israel’s assets barely hold
their own against the hostile Palestinian propaganda
permeating Western capitals - least of all come up with
the strength and skills for orchestrating a campaign on
behalf of Egypt, as the NYT seems to believe. Indeed,
Israel has been extremely wary of any association with
the Egyptian defense minister’s domestic affairs out of
the cold calculation. If it suited his political and
domestic agenda, the general might easily turn around
and accuse Israel of unwarranted meddling as his fall
guy. On Saturday, Aug. 17, El-Sisi remarked “This is no
time to attack the US and Israel, because our first
priority is to disband the Muslim Brotherhood.”Jerusalem
found this remark alarming rather than comforting,
noting that he made no promises about the future.
Why is the West bowing before the Brotherhood?
By: Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Alawsat
Most of the Western remarks about the Muslim
Brotherhood’s exclusion from governance in Egypt seem to
indicate that the Brotherhood is controlling the keys to
terrorism, and that the West can either instigate it or
end it. I cannot understand how the West believes the
Brotherhood is actually administrating Al-Qaeda, or even
that it has political and religious powers directing
armed groups. I cannot also understand how the
Brotherhood’s rule would save the West from terrorism in
the world. This is nonsense. At the time of Osama bin
Laden and Al-Qaeda’s organized operations, the Muslim
Brotherhood’s words were not heard or taken into
consideration and their ties did not work towards
halting the violence. The Muslim Brotherhood never
succeeded in supporting Al-Qaeda in any of its
operations. The group was bragging about representing
the other half of dynamic Islamists.
The ongoing violence since the 1990s is directed by
Islamic extremist groups expressing their intentions,
ideas and programs. These groups have their own leaders,
followers and marketing means. We cannot confuse these
groups with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the
National Islamic Front in Sudan, the Ennahda Movement in
Tunisia, or any other political group. Al-Qaeda and the
other jihadist groups do not recognize the Brotherhood
or similar political movements: Al-Qaeda believes that
such groups are conspiring with the regimes. On the
other hand, why does the West believe that Arabs and
Muslims have to accept such political groups, even if
they violated rights and sought to dominate
institutions? Why do they feel that such groups must be
accepted and obeyed? That is what happened in Egypt, as
the West is afraid to provoke these groups because,
according to them, they can incite terrorism. Why is the
West ready to concede defeat as soon as these groups’
leaders blackmail the West? You either have to submit to
their demands or they will wage violence against you;
this is what leaders speaking on behalf of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt, seeking to amplify their threats
on English-speaking channels, made sure to convey to
Western capitals.
The greatest dangers of terrorism groups come from
Al-Qaeda affiliated groups in Syria today; these are
neither linked to the Free Syrian Army, which is
fighting against Bashar Al-Assad’s regime, nor to any
Muslim Brotherhood group, whether in Syria, Egypt or
elsewhere. The armed jihadist groups in Libya and
Algeria have nothing to do with any of the Islamic
parties in these countries. Two problems occur when the
West supports the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt today and
calls for solidarity and dialogue with them, or when the
European Union holds a meeting, as it will next week,
for this same purpose. The first problem is supporting
extremist leaders within the Brotherhood, who entangled
the group with their practices that did not take into
consideration the government’s rules, but rather only
worked to dominate the country.
There are great leaders, such as Abdel Moneim
Aboul-Fotouh, who seceded from the Brotherhood because
of the extremism of the group’s leadership. The world,
and not just the West, is expected to push the
Brotherhood forces to support moderate historical and
young leaders, not leaders such as the current supreme
guide or Khairat Al-Shater, Mohamed Beltagy, Safwat
Hijazi and others.
The second problem is unsettling any possibility for
political reconciliation, where extremists feel they are
able to impose any solution on the Egyptians from
outside. Finally, surrendering to the blackmail of
extremist groups did not succeed in modifying the
behavior of these groups in the past and will not
succeed today. Rather, it will strengthen terrorist
voices, which say that the West is ready to walk out on
the largest Arab country. These are fascist groups that
want to dominate the region. What will it be like when
they will control Egypt on their own terms?
Barzani calls on Syrian Kurds to stay and fight
(REUTERS/Azad Lashkari)
Erbil and London, Asharq Al-Awsat—The Kurdistan Regional
Government in Iraq has faced huge problems in
accommodating the thousands of Syrian Kurdish refugees
who have arrived in the area since Saturday. Many had to
be sent to mosques and schools as a temporary measure
until suitable accommodation could be found. The UN
refugee agency announced on Monday that more than 30,000
people have crossed from Syria into Iraq since last
Thursday, August 15. The president of the Kurdistan
Region in Iraq, Massoud Barzani, has called on Kurds in
“Western Kurdistan”—the Kurdish areas in Syria—to stay
and defend their land. Barzani sent a message to Syrian
Kurds saying: “You all know that since the start of the
Syrian revolution, tens of thousands of our brothers
from Western Kurdistan have moved into our region, and
we have accommodated them in refugee camps. However,
regrettably, the international community did not offer
these refugees any help. Recently, large numbers of
refugees flooded our region again, and I would like to
offer my thanks and appreciation to the Kurdistan
Regional Government for the help it offered them by
providing them with transport and temporary
accommodation.”
“Having said all that, the issue remains very sensitive,
because we do not want Western Kurdistan to be emptied
of its Kurdish residents, and our people there must stay
and defend their land [and] try to attain their
legitimate rights,” he added. Meanwhile, Turkish prime
minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has called on the Kurdish
Democratic Union Party, which controls the Kurdish areas
in Syria, to join the Syrian National Coalition in
confronting the danger from armed groups in Kurdish
areas. In another development in Syria, a UN inspection
team arrived in the country on Sunday to investigate the
alleged use of chemical weapons in the war between
opposition and government forces. The team, which
is led by Swedish scientist Ake Sellstrom, arrived by
road from Beirut and will stay for 14 days. The
inspection team’s stay can be extended by mutual
agreement. The team will investigate claims by the
opposition that government forces have used chemical
weapons in Aleppo, Homs and Damascus.
Washington’s Disappointment in Egypt
Mostafa Zein/Al Hayat/The United States
had been reassured by the Muslim Brotherhood assuming
power in Egypt and their plans. It had seemed to it at
first that these plans were steadily moving forward to
form the basis of the new Middle East it seeks to build.
And there is nothing better than Islamists assuming
power in a major country like Egypt to fulfill such
plans.
The Americans built their strategy on grounds they had
assumed to be solid. Indeed, the region is a Muslim one,
and religious and sectarian tendencies there have been
on the rise for decades. Moreover, Turkey’s Islamists
have proven to be allies who can be relied on at
critical moments. Their quarrel with Israel had been a
passing one – and one which they made use of to get
closer to Arab peoples, while maintaining military and
intelligence collaboration with the Hebrew state. As for
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, it had passed multiple tests
before coming to power in Cairo, through numerous
meetings its members had held with officials in the
White House. After coming to power, President Mohamed
Morsi asserted that he used to work as an expert at the
NASA space agency and was proud of this. And it is well
known that the United States cannot entrust anyone with
the secrets of its agencies unless it has ascertained
their complete loyalty. Thus, whether his story proves
true or was merely meant for boasting, its purpose
remains to prove that he shares a single goal with the
Americans.
During its year in power, the Muslim Brotherhood had
labored to reinforce Washington’s trust in it. It
preserved the Camp David Accords with Israel. It drew
Hamas into the axis opposed to Iran and Syria. It
became, alongside the Ennahda Movement in Tunisia, a
main basis for American-Islamist cooperation (in the
political sense of the term) in the Middle East.Yet the
Americans, after the blood-spattered events in Egypt,
realized that their wager had been misplaced. Indeed,
the people came out by the millions to protest against
the policies of the Muslim Brotherhood, their monopoly
of power, and their attempts to impose their own
political concept of Islam and to subject every Egyptian
to a daily test to prove loyalty to them. In other
words, they tried to monopolize power through their own
understanding of Islam and impose such an understanding
on everyone, whether they were Muslim or non-Muslim.
America’s relapse in Egypt was expressed by President
Barack Obama, who interrupted his vacation to give the
Egyptian army a first warning. He thus cancelled the
joint “Bright Star” maneuvers, maintaining the financial
aid while waiting for what developments in Cairo will
result in. Thus, if the Egyptian army maintains the
policy it has been known to have, from the Sadat era to
that of Mubarak, Washington will maintain such aid, and
perhaps even increase it. Otherwise, it will cut off its
aid and take additional, more “offensive”, steps. In
fact, Congress and the press have begun to pave the way
for this by pressuring the White House.
Yet despite all the steps taken by America in supporting
or opposing the army, domestic developments remain the
core of the issue. Most important is for the Muslim
Brotherhood not to engage in violence and covert
activity, because this would solicit wider interference
from the United States and others, and would turn Egypt
into another Syria.
Between the army and the Muslim Brotherhood, Washington
will choose those who most closely adhere to its
policies, not those who are most democratic.
Responsibility For The Dahieh Bombing
Elias Harfoush/Al Hayat
Would it have been possible for Lebanon to avoid the
political and security repercussions to which
Hezbollah’s intervention in the war in Syria was
inevitably going to result? Even Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah
himself, when he announced for the first time the
participation of Hezbollah members in the fighting in
Qusayr, did not hide the fact that he was willing to pay
the price and bear the consequences of this
participation and of the reactions that it would lead
to. In his latest speech on the commemoration of the war
of 2006, Nasrallah once again confirmed what had already
been known and circulated about the fact that the recent
bombings targeting areas where Hezbollah is influential,
the latest being the bombing that took place in Beirut’s
Southern Suburb (Dahieh), were aimed at responding to
Hezbollah’s participation in the war in Syria alongside
the regime. Yet this did not drive Nasrallah to
reconsider his stance on such participation. On the
contrary, he in fact threatened those he referred to as
“takfiri terrorists”, saying that Hezbollah’s
intervention would be multiplied and that he himself was
prepared to personally take part in this war “for the
sake of Syria and its people”.
Such threats by Hezbollah to escalate its intervention
in the war in Syria obscure the fact that the profound
disagreement and division that exists in this country is
precisely over Syria’s interest and the future of its
people. The conflict has grown in Syria and the regime
has confronted the peaceful protests organized by those
who opposed it at the beginning of the crisis with
violence and blood-spattered repression. The conflict
has thus developed from clashes between the opposition
and the regime to a sectarian and confessional war, in
which the regime and the majority of its sect stand on
one side, while the majority of Syrians in the
opposition from the other sect stand on the other.
Any attempt to overlook this reality and to describe the
conflict in different terms, whether of patriotism or of
“defiance”, as Hezbollah’s media apparatus tries to do,
does not change the reality of the matter in any way.
Indeed, the reality is that Hezbollah’s intervention in
support of the regime in this war has led to arousing
the enmity of the majority of Syrians, opposition
supporters and ordinary citizens, in whose view the
future of their country can only be ensured by changing
this regime. Moreover, and due to the confessional
nature of the war taking place in Syria, Hezbollah’s
intervention has turned into support for one sect
against another. Making such an image even clearer has
been the discourse that has come to dominate recent
stances taken by Hezbollah and its Secretary-General,
who no longer hesitate to assert and boast of their
confessional identity – something which Hezbollah had
made sure to avoid in all of the conflicts it had waged
in the past, preferring to give itself the image of a
party that defends a “patriotic” ideal and considers the
resistance of Israel to represent the sole purpose of
its political and military activity.
This regression in the nature of Hezbollah’s discourse
has finally led it to exclude Israel from among those
accused of being responsible for the recent bombing in
Dahieh, after it pointed all accusations towards these
“takfiri” groups, without even repeating its traditional
accusation of these groups working for Israel.
Of course, one should not exclude the involvement of
“takfiris” in acts of violence and terrorism in Lebanon
and in other countries in the region, from among those
that have become the arenas of clashes, bombings and
suicide attacks, which are today taking on clearly
confessional features. It is because of such fears that
prudent calls were made from the beginning to keep
Lebanon safe from these confrontations by refraining
from implicating the country or any of its active
parties in the war in Syria, because of the dangerous
reactions this might entail for the fragile relations
that exist between Lebanese sects.
Yet confronting “takfiri” ideology and preventing
Lebanon from entering the flames of a confessional war,
which Nasrallah said the “takfiris” want to drive him
into, can only take place by moving away from the
language of “treason” – i.e. that of accusing other
Lebanese citizens of treason merely for having an
opinion different from that of the party. Indeed,
accusing others of treason represents the other side of
“takfir” (accusing others of apostasy), as it relies on
the same kind of exclusionist thinking that deprives
others of their right to an opinion… reaching up to
depriving them of their right to life.
As for the other way to confront “takfiris”, it is by
reaching out to the moderate voices that also reject
this kind of thinking in all sects, and in particular
within the Sunni sect. Indeed, fighting such voices and
trying to eliminate them, accusing them of being foreign
agents at times and of treason at others, would leave no
one in the forefront but extremist movements and voices,
whose terrorism Hezbollah claims today to have become
the victim of.
The State’s Authority Lasts Most
Mohammad el Ashab/Al Hayat
It is hard to believe that at least a glimpse of hope
remains from the Arab Spring. It seems that Rachid al-Ghannoushi,
the Tunisian An-Nahda leader, wants to imply that the
Islamists in power burnt themselves like candles in
order to provide light in the darkness.
The Islamic leader has provided a ray of hope by
acknowledging that his government committed an error of
judgment, although he failed to use this acknowledgement
to practice constructive self evaluation. Instead, he
seems to be working to form a non-partisan unity
cabinet. Al-Ghannoushi is rightfully clinging to the
formation of a cabinet based on the results of the
voting ballots. However, the interim periods calling for
historical consensuses do not actually clash with the
political objectives, provided that peaceful power
rotation becomes a steady tradition. When it comes to
the Tunisian case, the most important part does not
consist of the nature of the government that might be
formed to overcome the present crisis, but rather of the
road map that all the parties can agree on.
Several Islamic groups are now alluding to their
acceptance by the West as a passport for them. However,
this acceptance was warranted under different
circumstances when the hope of coexisting with the
Islamic movements was growing slim. The moderate voices
and experiences succeeded in dissipating the western
fears. However, the important part of this equation does
not consist of convincing the West to open up to these
movements but rather to convince the concerned masses
that these movements can actually induce the required
change. The people’s will – that brought the Islamic
governments to power under the banner of the democratic
legitimacy – has the final say in accepting or rejecting
these movements.
Tunisia played a pioneering role in overthrowing
tyranny. In light of this fact, Tunisia may proceed with
the peaceful power transfer without the need for any
storms or fires. Egypt provides a perfect example for
the replacement of dialogue with bullets: more victims
and losses can now be expected in the absence of a
civilized dialogue to support coexistence and security.
The uprising of the people in the street constituted
quite an interesting development. The movement of the
street was traditionally based on the nationalistic
issues, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the relationship
with the west. It then started to tackle the internal
dilemmas, namely the issues pertaining to rejecting
tyranny and the lack of democracy, freedom, and social
justice. This development indicates that time will not
go backwards because the Street’s reaction to injustice
and tyranny is paramount. However, instead of using this
fact to move into the world of freedom and openness,
things rather turned into quasi-confrontations between
different conflicting camps.
The most dangerous part is that these practices have
almost become locked in an “opposites’ equation” between
those parties who are clinging to power under the
pretext of democratic legitimacy, and those parties who
are calling for implementing the principles of the
revolution that go beyond “electoral gains.”
Undoubtedly, the masses of protestors have taken back to
the streets in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya due to the
state of disappointment vis-à-vis the governments’
performance in the post revolution phase. Democracy is
relative rather than absolute. The best kinds of rulers
are those who submit to the power of criticism. Early
elections, constitutions, the separation of powers, and
the determination of areas of expertise: all these are
mechanisms aimed at comprehending the tendency to
development.
All these concepts are prone to discussion. In their
quest for unity, the Europeans used voting ballots and
referendums as a means to learn the people’s positions.
Other deeply rooted democracies also revert to the
option of conducting referendums when faced with the
dilemma of split ideas and opinions. So why not use this
method in the countries of the so-called Arab Spring in
order to relieve the people from the hardship of street
protests? This is probably related to mentalities rather
than actions. Democratic solutions call for democratic
people who respect pluralism and differences. Several
tragedies could have been avoided with less
impulsiveness and more wisdom. The Islamic governments
failed to make achievements in short lapses of time;
however, they could have succeeded if they had waited
longer. There is a need to return to the voting ballots,
but this return will now be ridden with too many
tragedies following the outburst of the rivers of blood.
Power is not an objective on its own. Therefore,
maintaining power should not be a reason to kill or be
killed. With a little patience and a lot of meditation,
one can achieve something more constant and steadier:
the authority of a state that protects everybody under
the rule of law, stability and coexistence.
Behind Benghazi: Muslim Brotherhood
and Obama Administration
by Raymond Ibrahim/CBN News
http://www.meforum.org/3585/benghazi-muslim-brotherhood
Evidence that Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood was directly
involved in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in
Benghazi, where Americans including U.S. ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens were
killed, continues to mount.
First, on June 26, 2013, I produced and partially translated what purported to
be an internal Libyan governmental memo which was leaked and picked up by many
Arabic websites. According to this document, the Muslim Brotherhood, including
now ousted President Morsi, played a direct role in the Benghazi consulate
attack. "Based on confessions derived from some of those arrested at the scene,"
asserted the report, six people, "all of them Egyptians" from the jihad group
Ansar al-Sharia (Supporters of Islamic Law), were arrested. During
interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members:
confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial
sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning
of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose
names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President
Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi businessman Mansour Kadasa, owner
of the satellite station, Al-Nas; Egyptian Sheikh Muhammad Hassan; former
presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu Isma'il…
Four days after this memo appeared, the military-backed June 30 Egyptian
revolution took place. Many of the Islamists in the Libyan document have either
been arrested—including Safwat Hegazi and Abu Isma'il—or have arrest warrants
under terrorism charges.
Walid Shoebat followed up with some important investigative work concerning the
Libyan document, including by documenting that Western sources had finally
acknowledged that there is a group called Ansar al-Sharia operating in Egypt
with a cell in Libya, and that, with the ouster of Muhammad Morsi, it (along
with al-Qaeda) had declared jihad on Egypt's military (not to mention regular
civilians in general, and Coptic Christians in particular).
The fact is, days after the Benghazi attack back in September 2012, Muslim
Brotherhood connections appeared. A video made during the consulate attack
records people approaching the beleaguered U.S. compound; one of them yells to
the besiegers in an Egyptian dialect, "Don't shoot—Dr. Morsi sent us!"
apparently a reference to the former Islamist president.
Most recently, on July 29, 2013, Ahmed Musa, a prominent Egyptian political
insider and analyst made several assertions on Tahrir TV that further connected
the dots. During his program, while berating U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson for
her many pro-Brotherhood policies—policies that have earned her the hate and
contempt of millions of Egyptians—Musa insisted that he had absolute knowledge
that the murderer of Chris Stevens was Mohsin al-'Azzazi, whose passport was
found in Brotherhood leader Khairet al-Shatter's home, when the latter was
arrested. According to the firm assurances of political analyst Musa, 'Azzazi is
currently present in Raba'a al-Adawiya, where he, the seasoned terrorist, is
preparing to do what he does best—terrorize Egypt, just as the Brotherhood have
promised, in revenge for the ousting of Morsi.
But why would Morsi and the Brotherhood attack the consulate in Libya in the
first place? The day before the embassy attacks, based on little known but
legitimate Arabic reports, I wrote an article titled "Jihadis Threaten to Burn
U.S. Embassy in Cairo," explaining how Islamists—including al-Qaeda—were
threatening to attack the U.S. embassy in Cairo unless the notorious Blind
Sheikh—an Islamist hero held in prison in the U.S. in connection to the first
World Trade Center bombing—was released. The date September 11 was also
deliberately chosen to attack the embassy to commemorate the "heroic" September
11, 2001 al-Qaeda strikes on America. (Regardless, the Obama administration,
followed by the so-called mainstream media, portrayed the embassy attacks as
unplanned reactions to an offensive movie.)
The theory is this: in order to negotiate the release of the Blind Sheikh, the
Islamists needed an important American official to barter in exchange. And while
the violence on U.S. embassies began in Egypt, it seemed logical that kidnapping
an American official from neighboring Libya would be less conspicuous than in
Egypt, where Egyptians, including Morsi, were calling for the release of the
Egyptian Blind Sheikh. Thus the U.S. consulate in Libya was attacked, Chris
Stevens kidnapped, but in the botched attempt, instead of becoming a valuable
hostage, he wound up dead.
Add to all this the fact that, despite the very serious charges filed against
them—including inciting murder and terrorism, and grand treason—the Obama
administration, first with Anne Patterson, and now with Senators John McCain and
Lindsay Graham, keep pressuring Egypt to release Brotherhood leaders; McCain
personally even visited the civilian al-Shatter, whose raided home revealed the
passport of 'Azzazi, whom Musa claims is the murderer of Stevens.
Needless to say, at this point, tens of millions of Egyptians are convinced that
U.S. leadership is fully aware of the Brotherhood's connection to Benghazi—and
hence desperately pushing for the release of Brotherhood leadership, lest, when
they are tried in Egypt's courts, all these scandals become common knowledge.
Meanwhile in the United States, to a mainstream American public—conditioned as
it is by a mainstream media—all of the above is just a "conspiracy theory,"
since surely the U.S. government is transparent with the American people—except,
that is, when it's not.
Raymond Ibrahim is author of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam's New War in
Christians (published by Regnery in cooperation with Gatestone Institute, April
2013). He is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an
associate fellow at the Middle East Forum.
Arab states ready to cover any cuts in aid to Egypt: Saudi
Arabia
August 19, 2013/Agence France Presse
JEDDAH: Saudi Arabia said on Monday that Arab and Islamic countries will step in
to help Egypt if Western nations cut aid packages to Cairo over its deadly
crackdown on Islamist protesters.
"To those who have announced they are cutting their aid to Egypt, or threatening
to do that, (we say that) Arab and Muslim nations are rich... and will not
hesitate to help Egypt," Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said in a
statement carried by the kingdom's SPA state news agency. Prince Saud was
speaking upon his return from France, where he held talks with President
Francois Hollande who has strongly condemned the violence in Egypt. Hundreds of
people have been killed in the North African country since security forces began
a clampdown on Muslim Brotherhood protests last week.
US Senator John McCain called on Washington to suspend its $1.3 billion in
annual aid to Egypt's military after it overthrew Islamist president Mohamed
Morsi on July 3. But some US lawmakers have expressed concern that cutting off
aid could endanger Egypt's 1979 peace treaty with Israel or compromise US
privileges concerning the Suez Canal. Foreign ministers of the European Union
are to hold emergency talks on Wednesday to review the bloc's relations with
Cairo.
At stake is nearly five billion euros ($6.7 billion) in loans and grants
promised by the world's top aid donor to Egypt for 2012-2013. It includes one
billion euros from the EU with the rest from European banks the EIB and EBRD.
Prince Saud accused countries that slammed Egypt's crackdown of "believing
propaganda" and assuming "hostile positions towards the interests and the
stability of Arab and Islamic nations." "Let those states that are taking
negative stances know that the blaze and destruction will not be confined to
Egypt, but will affect all those who supported trouble," he said. Saudi Arabia
and other Gulf countries welcomed Egypt's ouster of Morsi, which infuriated
supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood's president and sent them to the streets.
King Abdullah was the first leader to send a message of congratulations to
caretaker president Adly Mansour, who was appointed shortly after the army
deposed Morsi following nationwide protests. Saudi Arabia later announced an aid
package of $5 billion to Egypt. Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates followed
suit, bringing the pledges made by the three oil-rich Arab states of the Gulf to
$12 billion. The Saudi monarch pledged on Friday the kingdom's support for
Egypt's fight against "terrorism", and has ordered the dispatch of three
fully-equipped field hospitals to Cairo.