Bible Quotation for today/Life - death and grain of wheat
parable
John 12/20-28:
"Now among those who went up to worship at the festival were some
Greeks. They came to Philip, who was from
Bethsaida in Galilee, and said to him, ‘Sir, we wish to see Jesus.’
Philip went and told Andrew; then Andrew and Philip went and told
Jesus. Jesus answered them, ‘The hour has come for
the Son of Man to be glorified. Very truly, I tell
you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just
a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.
Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in
this world will keep it for eternal life. Whoever
serves me must follow me, and where I am, there will my servant be also.
Whoever serves me, the Father will honour. ‘Now my
soul is troubled. And what should I say "Father, save me from this hour"?
No, it is for this reason that I have come to this hour.
Father, glorify your name.’ Then a voice came from heaven, ‘I have
glorified it, and I will glorify it again".
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters &
Releases from miscellaneous sources
Hezbolah Versus Michel Sleiman: Forcing their hand/Now
Lebanon/October 8, 2012
Butheina Shaaban/By:Hazem
Saghiyeh/Now Lebanon/October 08/12
Al-Shara: Al-Assad’s alternative/By
Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/October 08/12
Turkey: Caught between actions and words/By
Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Alawsat/October 08/12
Muslim Persecution of Christians: August,
2012/By
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/October
08/12
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for
October 08/12
Iranian official: Israel to lose 10,000 troops if strikes
Iran
Lebanese Security Plan to Combat Lawlessness to Kick Off
in Bekaa
U.S. court to look into Shibli Aisamy disappearance:
daughter
Lebanon's Arabic press digest - Oct. 8, 2012
March 14 MPs slam Hezbollah ‘role in Syria’
U.N. envoy in Lebanon
repeats need for distancing Lebanon from Syria crisis
Shaaban recordings evidence of criminal
involvement: source
Commander of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon Maj. Gen.
Paolo Serraasks to move UNIFIL HQ after threats received
UNHCR Report Says Nearly 85,200 Syrians Fled Crackdown to
Lebanon
Ban: Escalation on Syria-Turkey Border 'Extremely
Dangerous'
Turkey fires artillery into Syria after shelling
Turkey, Syria trade fire; border tensions mount
Turkey fires artillery into Syria after shelling
Israeli jets fly mock raids over south Lebanon
'UAV flight exposes weakness in Israeli air defense'
Romney plans to bring new face to old conflict
Venezuela's Chavez re-elected to extend his rule
Barak: If ordered, IDF
can conquer Gaza
Rocket barrage from
Gaza injures 1
IAF strikes in south Gaza; 2 jihadists hurt
Dozens of rockets, mortars hit south
Israel
Saudi Grand Mufti: Replace Female ID Pictures with
Fingerprints
Muslim Egyptian Lawyer and His Sons Attempt to Demolish
Church
U.S. court to look into Shibli Aisamy
disappearance: daughter
October 08, 2012/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: A U.S. court has accepted to look into the case of Syrian dissident
Shibli Aisamy after his family filed an international lawsuit in the case,
Aisamy’s daughter, Rajaa Sharafeddine, told The Daily Star Monday.
“The court hasn’t yet declared that it has accepted the case
as it is waiting to finalize a number of procedures, but we were informed that
the case was accepted,” said Sharafeddine.
Aisamy’s daughter said the step aimed at pressuring the Syrian regime, which the
Shibli family believes is behind the kidnapping of the Baath Party founder, in
order to reveal his whereabouts.
Sharafeddine said the decision to turn to U.S. courts came after Lebanese
authorities’ lack of progress in the case.
“With nothing clear about my father’s fate, we resorted to the judicial
authorities in the U.S. because the Lebanese authorities proved to be futile in
this regard and luckily the court accepted the case,” she said.
Aisamy, 88, who served as a Syrian vice president in the
1960s, disappeared in May last year after leaving his daughter’s home in Aley,
Mount Lebanon, for a walk.
His family has repeatedly called on leaders of the Lebanese opposition and
pro-Syrian parties, including Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah, to
intercede with the Syrian regime to secure his release and determine his
fate.“Very few politicians supported us, although we have continuously
highlighted the value of my father as an intellectual,” she said.
Aisamy’s disappearance came almost two months after the Syrian uprising against
Syrian President Bashar Assad broke out.
Sharafeddine reiterated that she believed her father was being held in Syria.
She also suggested her father might have been kidnapped because of the scope of
knowledge he had acquired over the years given his position in the Syrian
hierarchy.
“My father left politics ever since 1992 so there was no apparent reason for his
disappearance. I’d say that the Syrian regime was scared of him because he has a
lot of historical information.
“My brother, Bashar, was politically active over the Internet when the Syrian
revolution broke out, this might be an additional reason for my father’s
kidnapping,” she added.
“We definitely couldn’t see that coming... If my father was planning to go back
into politics, he wouldn’t have stayed in Lebanon and jeopardized his life,” she
added.
As she described how patient, modest and deep her father was, Sharafeddine said
her upbringing was the thing that allowed her to cope with her father’s
disappearance.
“If it wasn’t for the strength he bestowed in us, we wouldn’t have been able to
endure what happened.
“I have no idea if he is dead or alive and that is very hard,” she said.
Sharafeddine also said that the family has been printing books her father wrote
to introduce his work to the public.
“Maybe if they read some of his work, they would do something... Maybe his
writings will motivate public opinion to raise its voice and demand that his
fate be uncovered” said Sharafeddine.
Security Plan to Combat Lawlessness
to Kick Off in Bekaa
Naharnet 08 October 2012/The security agencies, AMAL movement, and Hizbullah
agreed on a scenario to help implement a security plan that will kick off this
week in the Bekaa region, al-Akhbar daily reported on Monday. The plan to
control the spread of outlaws, thieves, carjacking and kidnapping fanning out in
the eastern region aims to gain the people's support in a bid to assist the
Lebanese army's mission and make it a success, the daily added. “The Lebanese
army does not want to suppress the demands of the people in the Bekaa or improve
their living and economic conditions, but to fight thieves and outlaws,” unnamed
security sources told the daily. On the other hand, As Safir newspaper pointed
that Speaker Nabih Berri will hold a meeting with a delegation from Bekaa clan
elders in the context of preparations for the security plan. It is likely that
the visiting delegation will also meet with Army Commander General Jean Qahwaji.
Berri told As Safir that the time has come for the state to grasp control and
extend its authority once again in the Bekaa region. “The region has paid dearly
for negligence at all levels,” Berri said. The cabinet approved recently a
1.6-billion-dollar plan to provide the Lebanese army with the necessary
equipment and arms. The payments will be made over a five-year period.
Increasing crime, thefts and abductions in Bekaa have intensified in the past
year, although the state institutions have launched a number of campaigns to
combat the trend. Military and security experts say that kidnapping, carjacking
and other crime will continue to increase amid a decentralization of security
authority in Lebanon that has led security bodies to align with rival sects.
Lebanon's Arabic press
digest - Oct. 8, 2012
October 08, 2012 /The Daily Star
Lebanon's Arabic press digest.
Following are summaries of some of the main stories in a selection of Lebanese
newspapers Monday. The Daily Star cannot vouch for the accuracy of these
reports.
Al-Mustaqbal
Bouthaina Shaaban describes evidence of her involvement as "polemics"
Assad followers threaten the situation in Lebanon will explode soon
Pending new revelations of the precious treasure hidden in the personal computer
of Michel Samaha on the terrorist bombing scheme, the facts shown so far
implicating Ali Mamlouk and Bashar Assad’s advisor Bouthaina Shaaban remain the
responsibility of the relevant judicial authority – judge Riad Abu Ghayda.
Significantly, however, was a threat made by one of Assad’s followers in Beirut
that "the situation will explode soon," if the Lebanese stance repeatedly made
by President Michel Sleiman remains unchanged.
Although the evidence is backed by confessions, Shaaban – according to sources
close to her – believe they are “a kind of political bickering that is familiar
in Lebanon and do not merit a response or comment.”
Ad-Diyar
Wissam al-Hasan begins scheme to build a Sunni sate in the north
Hariri demanded Qabbani’s swift dismissal in preparation for a Sunni role in
Syria
Petraeus will provide Free Syrian Army with weapons via ISF Information Branch
It seems serious scheme went into effect after a meeting between the head of the
Internal Security Forces Information Branch Wissam al-Hasan and CIA Director
David Petraeus.
The decision – made by the U.S. and Gulf [states] – calls for the establishment
of a Sunnis state stretching from the Qalamoun region in the north to the
Lebanese-Syrian border in Akkar. This area includes more than half a million
Sunnis, with human elements equipped by the CIA to fight.
The plan requires speed. So former Prime Minister Saad Hariri contacted Sunni
figures in Beirut, Sidon and Tripoli, asking them to quickly sack Lebanon’s
Grand Mufti Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani or isolate him by paying senior
clerics huge amounts of money to help dismiss Qabbani.
Meanwhile, Wissam Hasan is working on delineating the Sunni state in the north.
All these [developments] are linked because Washington, and specifically the
CIA, informed Hasan that Bashar Assad’s regime would fall in the next six to
nine months and so Lebanon should be ready for the next phase.
An-Nahar
Mission 213: Hezbollah in the circle of suspicion
If Hezbollah justified the explosion that ripped through an arms depot in Nabi
Sheet last week by claiming that it was a weapons depot for the resistance then
the party has now entered the circle of suspicion both internally and
externally.
Hezbollah has once again entered the circle of accusations, this time in
relation to the December 2005 assassination of MP Gebran Tueni after the
satellite channel "Al-Arabiya” leaked documents from Syria, including one that
refers to "mission 213" concerning an operation that was completed with
“excellent results” between Dec. 10, 2005, and Dec. 12, 2005 – the day Tueni was
assassinated.
According to the document, the operation was carried out "with the help of
elements in Hezbollah’s intelligence."
Meanwhile, The Times newspaper said about 1,500 Hezbollah fighters are fighting
alongside the regular Syrian army in Aleppo. The report confirms the death of
the three Hezbollah fighters in Syria last week.
A parliamentary source told An-Nahar that the reports by the international
media, which have become almost certain, contradicts the government’s
disassociation policy which adopted toward the Syria crisis, adding that Lebanon
could possibly face international sanctions in the future.
However, the most serious issue concerns Hezbollah giving Israel an excuse to
launch a new war on Lebanon – similar to that of 2006 – as Israeli security
authorities were leaning toward accusing the party of being behind a
reconnaissance plane that the Israelis shot down Saturday.
Israeli Radio and the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot said the plane did not
originate from Gaza. They said the plane was Iranian-made and Hezbollah was
responsible for sending it.
Al-Akhbar
Security plan in the Bekaa this week
If all goes well, a security plan for the Bekaa area will be implemented this
week following contacts between the security forces and each of the Amal
Movement and Hezbollah on a plan which aims to fight theft, law-breakers and
security saboteurs. Therefore, a deal was reached between the two Shiite parties
and the Lebanese Army on a number of measures to ensure a smooth implementation
of the plan.
Butheina Shaaban
Hazem Saghiyeh/Now Lebanon/October 8, 2012
If it turns out to be true that Syrian presidential adviser Butheina Shaaban is
in any way involved in conveying explosives into Lebanon, then this goes beyond
Mrs. Shaaban as such and tells us loads about where we stand and the events
around us. Such a connection would indeed cause such a mess in the ideas
prevailing among us, one that is far greater than the mess Shaaban has
potentially put herself in.
Shaaban started her public career as a writer calling for the emancipation of
Arab women before she became late Syrian President Hafez Assad’s translator,
which means she has many characteristics of progress and modernism. In addition
to calling for gender equality, without which there is neither modernism nor
progress, she worked as a medium between languages and cultures. Being a
translator at the Presidential Palace, she normally had to adhere to diplomatic
customs, which – by definition – urge to abide by politeness and discipline.
Moreover, Butheina became known for her ties with several western diplomats and
journalists, which was the most probable cause that brought her closer to
[former Minister] Michel Samaha. Yet these very ties to western diplomats and
journalists presupposes a broadness of horizons and a knowledge of the outside
world and the events going on there, not to mention travelling to foreign lands
and getting informed of their cultures and ways of life. Shaaban was also
rumored to have ties to “moderate opponents” to the Syrian regime, and such a
role implies flexibility, a readiness for dialogue and, of course, an
acknowledgement of the dialogue partner.
All these specifications call upon their holder to have certain appearance, food
and clothing preferences, such as those by which [Syrian First Lady] Asma
Al-Assad has become known. Being à la mode like that is not merely about one’s
outer appearance, as it also indicates a modern personality and character added
to a charming conversation and knowledge of how to choose specific words and
terms. This is the exact opposite of a primitive character, which is best known
for harshness of judgment and coarseness of expression.
In other words, Butheina Shaaban is the opposite model of an uncivilized takfiri
Salafist who is unconnected to the outside world, dominated by primitive and
extremist thought, and characterized by a lack of knowledge of the languages,
customs and values lying outside his immediate circle.
In this sense, Mrs. Shaaban has all the characteristics we would want to see in
an Arab woman, as she is aware of her rights, which are equal to men’s, and is
able to deal with strong leaders inasmuch as she can initiate dialogue with
their opponents. She is also a blend of patriotic loyalty to the place from
whence she emerged to the world and universalist tendencies that prompt her not
to feel estranged in any world city nor with any world diplomat or journalist.
Still, Butheina Shaaban may be accused of involvement in conveying explosives
from Syrian into Lebanon in order to kill innocent civilians.
How is the mystery inherent to such a contradiction to be resolved? What about
the contradiction with the image of the takfiri Salafist, who – as some claim –
is the only one to deal with explosives and tools of death? In this respect, it
is enough to mention that Nazi generals were of an astounding decency and
propriety. They made it a point to display their utmost politeness and listen to
some of the finest symphonies produced by German classical music while
overseeing, at the same time, the burning of German and European Jews in the
Holocaust’s crematoriums.
*This article is a translation of the original, which appeared on the NOW Arabic
site on Monday October 8, 2012
Hezbolah Versus Michel Sleiman: Forcing their hand
Now Lebanon/October 8, 2012
Michel Suleiman has once again forced Hezbollah to admit its true intentions.
There’s how it should be, and there’s how it is. And with this tenet in mind, it
is worth contemplating President Michel Suleiman’s recent national defense
strategy proposal to place “the arms of the Resistance under the army’s command
in the case of Israeli aggression on Lebanese soil only and not for any other
domestic or foreign reason” until the army is suitably equipped to do the job.
Suleiman has been burnishing his presidential credentials in recent weeks and
this latest proposal in his keeping with his centrist position.
We all know that in a perfect world there would be no need for such
horse-trading. No country with any sense of nationhood and a respect for the
institutions of the state would tolerate the armed wing of a political party
possessing state-of-the-art weapons to operate outside government control. The
pro-Western March 14 bloc has, quite rightly, never wavered from its insistence
that Hezbollah unconditionally hand in its arms and play party politics on level
terms. But in terms of gauging Hezbollah’s real intentions (if there were any
doubt left), Suleiman’s suggestion is a worthwhile exercise. The Party of God
has always maintained that its weapons are solely for the defense of Lebanon
against Israeli aggression but that it must operate independently of the
Lebanese military. This, we are told, is necessary to ensure tight security. It
is a card that has, some would say rather cynically, been played ad nauseam to
justify this autonomy. But today there is an overwhelming groundswell of
opinion, not to mention a significant body of evidence, to argue that the
militia is nothing more than an adjunct of Iran Revolutionary Guard, a force
committed to protecting the strategic regional interests of Tehran and Damascus.
Indeed, within the last few days there has been an allegation in the London
Times that Hezbollah has around 1,500 fighters operating in Syria on behalf in
the regime.
Its role during the attempted coup of 2008 and the intimidation it used to
topple Saad Hariri’s government in January 2010—as well as recent assurances
from Iran that Hezbollah would join in any war with Israel and that al-Quds
Force military advisers are working in Lebanon—has only served to reinforce this
idea.
Suleiman believes that his plan is necessary until the army is properly equipped
and capable of “defending Lebanon against any Israeli aggression” (he should
have said ANY aggression, but we’ll cut him some slack on that one). Last month,
the Lebanese cabinet approved a $1.6 billion plan to provide weapons, equipment
and training to the army over the next five years. In light of this, Suleiman’s
proposal is one based upon a natural evolutionary process, even if we concede
that it is not perfect. The proposal also gives Hezbollah even less wiggle room,
since its argument has always been that the army is not up to the job. The plan
would also put Israel on notice that the state now had a role in the defense of
the nation. Previously Israel could claim to have been fighting a terrorist
force. It will no doubt still claim that Hezbollah will still be calling the
shots, and this is why it is important that such a plan have a maturity date at
which point the army is the sole defender of the nation. Maybe then we can
dispense with the laughable mantra “the army, Resistance and the people.” Most
importantly, one assumes that such an arrangement would ensure that the botched
kidnap of Israeli soldiers that led to the 2006 war would not happen again.
Dispensing with the “who should be biffing Israel?” debate would also allow the
political process to move forward to other issues. Lebanon has, for too long,
been bogged down by the Hezbollah weapons argument. Not only does it eat away at
whatever sovereignty we have left by admitting to an unacceptable level of
regional influence in Lebanese affairs, it also diverts attention away from
arguably more important concerns such as the economy and infrastructure and does
little to cement Lebanon’s standing within the international community.
But all this talk is academic. We all know that Hezbollah is unlikely to agree
to the proposal, but by tabling it Suleiman has once again forced Hezbollah to
admit its true intentions.
Iranian official:
Israel to lose 10,000 troops if strikes Iran
Ynet Published: 10.08.12/ynetnews
Former chief of IRGC says in event of Israeli military strike on Iran, 'Israeli
death toll would not be less than 10,000' A senior Iranian official said that at
least 10,000 Israelis would be killed in the event of an Israeli military strike
on the Islamic republic.“If the Israelis attack, Iran’s deterrent power would
deal a mortal blow to them and the Israeli death toll would not be less than
10,000. Therefore, they would be stopped soon,” Mohsen Rezaei, former chief of
the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps was quoted as saying.We don’t want war, but
are fully prepared to defend our country against any strike. Of course the
Zionists wouldn't dare invade Iran and only speak of war to win concessions from
the next US president,” said Rezaei. Rezaei further accused the West of trying
to derail the "Islamic Awakening" movement by interfering in Syria. “At present,
the Western efforts are focused on diverting the Islamic Awakening movement
towards seeking a Western-style democracy and transform it into seeking a
US-style democracy by toppling the Syrian government," he said. On Sunday, the
German newspaper Der Spiegel reported that the Iranian foreign minister, , Ali
Akbar Salehi had proposed a "trade-off" in the country's stand-off with the West
over its disputed nuclear program. "If our right to enrichment is recognized, we
are ready for a trade-off. We would, on a voluntary basis, limit the amount of
our enrichment," he said
Dozens of rockets, mortars hit south
Israel
Ilana Curiel Latest Update: 10.08.12/ynetnews
No injuries reported as Gazans launch 55 rockets, mortar shells at Eshkol
Regional Council less than day after an IAF strike in Gaza injured 11; Hamas,
Islamic Jihad: Attack in response to 'Zionist crimes'
Terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip fired some 55 rockets and mortar shells at
southern Israel early Monday morning. The shells landed in communities in the
Eshkol Regional Council. There were no reports of injuries, although two
buildings were lightly damaged and several goats were killed due to an explosion
in an animal corner.
Hamas' military wing Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades and the Ansar al-Quds group
have claimed responsibility for Monday morning's attack on the south. They
claimed the attack was a response to the IAF's airstrike on Gaza on Sunday. This
blessed operation came in response to continuous and repeated enemy crimes
against our defenceless people," a joint statement said.
In response to Monday's mortar attack on southern Israel, the IDF carried out
three aerial strikes and one ground assault on Hamas terror hubs and rocket
launching pads.
The first rockets were launched shortly after 6:00 am. Palestinians in the Gaza
Strip fired at least three mortar shells which then exploded in Israel. One of
the shells exploded near a residential building in the Eshkol Region, slightly
damaging it. The two other shells exploded in open areas.
Around 9:00 am, additional shelling was reported. Authorities have asked
residents of the Eshkol region to remain in close proximity to shelters.
Yehuda Kedem, a resident of one the communities in Eshkol said that "at 5:50 am
we heard a large explosion. Apparently the mortar exploded nearby to the kibbutz
synagogue. About 6-7 mortar shells hit our area."
One mortar landed in an animal corner in one of the communities in Eshkol. Ilan,
who is in charge of the livestock in the kibbutz where the mortar hit said that
this was the first mortar to ever hit the community.
"I never imagined that our kibbutz would be hit. This is the first time a mortar
has exploded inside the kibbutz. Some of the goats are severely injured and some
are dead. Usually the animal corner is packed with children but we don't work on
the holiday. We avoided a great tragedy," he said. Hamas and the Islamic Jihad
claimed that the attack on southern Israel came as a response to the "Zionist
crimes."
Abu Ovadia, the spokesman for the military wing of Hamas said that "the
resistance will not allow (Israel) to continue perpetrating this aggression
under the guise of groundless excuses."
He warned that further Israeli aggression in Gaza will be met with a strong
response led by the Palestinian resistance groups.
The mortar attack on southern Israel came less than 24 hours after an IAF
airstrike in southern Gaza, which left ten injured, two of them severely.
IDF officials said the attack, carried out in cooperation with the Shin Bet
security service, targeted two global jihadists who were planning to carry out a
major terror attack over the Simchat Torah holiday against Israeli soldiers and
civilians.
The IDF's
Spokesperson's Unit identified the men as Tla'ath Halil Muhammad Jerbi (23), a
global jihad operative from Rafah; and Abdullah Mohamed Hassan Maqawi (24), a
member of the The Mujahideen Shura Council (MSC) in the Environs of Jerusalem, a
global jihad group that is based in Gaza.
The army said Jerbi has been involved in extensive terrorist activity against
Israel for years, and over the past few days was involved in the preparation of
a terror attack in Sinai.
March 14 MPs slam Hezbollah ‘role in Syria’
October 08, 2012/The Daily Star
In remarks published Monday, Lebanese Forces MP Antoine Zahra said his rivals in
Hezbollah could no longer claim that their weapons were merely directed at
Israel given recent reports indicating its direct involvement in the Syrian
conflict.
“The resistance can no longer claim that its arms are to defend Lebanon because
it is being used locally and against the Syrian people as well as in an attempt
to gain control over Lebanon,” Zahra told Al-Joumhouria newspaper.
Several media agencies carried reports alleging Hezbollah fighters were carrying
out operation in Syria and that several had been killed as a result.
Hezbollah has repeatedly denied such allegations but the party has not issued a
denial with regards to the recent reports.
Zahra said the resistance was showing poor judgment with regards to the 18-month
long crisis in Lebanon’s neighbor and said the party’s actions were antithetical
to state-building.
“I expected more wisdom from Hezbollah but its leadership surprised me with
their double-standard behavior vis a vis what is happening in Syria via their
commitment to arms and its role in the service of Iran which places them in a
contradictory position to the goal of state building,” Zahra said.
Hezbollah has urged that Lebanon remain neutral on the crisis in Syria while
accusing the March 14 opposition, particularly the Future Movement, of assisting
and financing fighters against President Bashar Assad’s government.
Meanwhile, Future Movement MP Ahmad Fatfat predicted that Hezbollah’s political
rhetoric would gradually become more aggressive as the party becomes even more
involved in the conflict next door.
“Hezbollah’s future political speech will be aggressive to coincide with the
military and security plan that it’s heading in Syria after becoming a main
party [in the conflict],” Fatfat told Al-joumhouria daily.
“That is what the Syrian people are confirming every day after Hezbollah turned
its resistance against Israel to a militia fighting alongside Assad's Shabiha,”
he added.
Both Fatfat and Zahra supported recent stances by President Michel Sleiman’s in
which the Lebanese leader said the weapons of the resistance should fall under
the command of the state while armed groups in the country whose weapons serve
an internal domestic function should be disarmed.
Sleiman, who in June launched the stalled National Dialogue, has proposed a
national defense strategy aimed at benefiting from Hezbollah’s arms. Under the
proposal, the party would not hand its arms over to the Army, as demanded by the
March 14 coalition, nor would there be a separate command for the resistance and
the military, the defense strategy that Hezbollah backs.
“[Hezbollah] has abandoned chances that wise men have given to the resistance in
a bid to balance out their previous mistakes and an attempt to glorify its
arms,” Zahra said, adding that his party supported the president’s approach.
Fatfat said Sleiman’s comments should prompt Hezbollah to re-evaluate its
position given that the party “is not accustomed to such comments from a high
authority like the presidency.”
Commander of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon Maj. Gen. Paolo Serraasks
to move UNIFIL HQ after threats received
October 08, 2012/By Hasan Lakkis/The
Daily Star
BEIRUT: Commander of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon Maj. Gen. Paolo Serra
asked Prime Minister Najib Mikati in May to move the headquarters of the
peacekeeping force to Baabda following threats to its current base in Bir
Hassan. Serra sent a letter to Mikati requesting the
move to “mitigate its [the force’s] exposure to threat that has been assessed to
exist at the ‘UNIFIL house’ in Bir Hassan, on the basis of intelligence provided
to UNIFIL by the government of Lebanon.”The Foreign Ministry will present the
request to the Cabinet in its session Wednesday.
In his letter, Serra also emphasized that the location of the prospective
headquarters would smooth coordination between the UNIFIL, the Office of the
United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon and the Lebanese Army.
“The location of the property in close proximity to the Lebanese Army HQ
in Yarze as well as the offices of UNSCOL is ideal for purposes of facilitating
closer cooperation between UNIFIL and both of these key partners, consistent
with the recommendations of the recent strategic review of UNIFIL,” Serra added.
The review released last spring recommended better communication between U.N.
bodies working with UNIFIL, greater involvement from the Lebanese government and
increased military capacity for the Lebanese Army.In a letter sent to the
Cabinet ahead of its meeting this week, the Foreign Ministry said the Department
of Research and Guidance at the Council of Civil Service examined the issue and
found that moving the headquarters and finding a new building is required under
an agreement between Lebanon and the United Nations.
Serra said the property selected by UNIFIL was one of 18 that met the overall
requirements and asked the government to pursue negotiations on its behalf under
the 1995 agreement. The government is required to provide “without cost to
UNIFIL and in agreement with the force commander” properties for headquarters
and camps for the peacekeeping forces.
The annual rent of the current UNIFIL headquarters in Bir Hassan is $440,150,
and the UNIFIL leadership estimates that the new headquarters in Baabda would
cost $580,800 each year. The Finance Ministry said it was up to the full Cabinet
to decide whether to approve the request. Meanwhile Serra said Sunday that the Lebanon-Israel border is witnessing the
calmest period in years due to close ties between the peacekeepers and the Army.
“Six years following the adoption of Resolution 1701, we are witnessing the
calmest period southern Lebanon has seen in many years,” Serra said on the
occasion of handing leadership of Italair from Lt. Col. Andrea Cercolani to Lt.
Col. Giuliano Innecco. “Much of this unprecedented peaceful period can be attributed to the ever closer
relationship between UNIFIL and the Lebanese Armed Forces, and the kind support
of the Lebanese people, for which I am deeply grateful,” he added.
Shaaban recordings evidence of criminal involvement: source
October 08, 2012/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Statements captured on former MP Michel Samaha’s recording device are
evidence of criminal involvement of Bashar Assad’s political adviser in the case
of plotting terror attacks in Lebanon, a high-level security source said Monday.
“Bouthaina Shaaban’s involvement in the Samaha case is confirmed,” the
source told The Daily Star. “The recordings confirm
Bouthaina Shaaban had knowledge of Samaha’s security and political activity as
well as the tasks that were assigned to him,” the source added. He spoke on
condition of anonymity. “He would call her ‘our
magnificent’ and she would speak to him in a commanding manner, [ordering] him
to carry out the duties assigned to him, including the bombings,” the source
said. He said the recordings show that Samaha was
“directly linked” to Shaaban’s office. Future Movement
MP Samir Jisr, in comments to Future TV Monday, said there were documents that
confirmed Shaaban’s was involved in the Samaha case and that this implicated
Syria.
“Documents confirm Shaaban’s involvement in the Samaha case, and this, if
anything, implicates Syria as a government in this matter,” Jisr said Monday.
Shaaban dismissed Sunday reports of her involvement in the Samaha case.
Sources close to Bouthaina Shaaban quoted her as saying that what is
happening in Lebanon is no more than political bickering and is not worth
responding to or commenting on.
An analysis of a phone conversation between Shaaban and Samaha, who is close to
Assad, was referred to Lebanon’s first military investigative judge over the
weekend.
“Military Prosecutor Judge Saqr Saqr referred to First Military Investigative
Judge Riad Abu Ghayda an analysis report [from the Internal Security Forces
Information Branch] of a mobile phone conversation that reveals Samaha was in
direct contact with Shaaban,” a judicial source told The Daily Star.
According to the report, the source added, the phone conversation was
made while Samaha was in Syria.
Following his arrest, Samaha confessed he had brought back to Lebanon explosives
following a visit to Syria. Samaha, who has maintained
close ties with the Syrian regime for decades, was charged in August with
transporting explosives from Syria into Lebanon to use them in terrorist attacks
aimed at assassinating religious and political figures.
He has confessed to plotting bomb attacks with head of Syria’s
Intelligence Maj. Gen. Ali Mamlouk and his assistant, Maj. Gen. Adnan, at the
behest of Assad.
Turkey: Caught between actions and words
By Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed/Asharq Alawsat
I do not know to what extent Turkish officials understand how much damage they
have suffered in the Arab world as a result of Syria; the issue itself and
Turkish stances relating to it, in addition to what preceded it. However, I am
sure that the Turks are more capable than others at calculating their own
interests, and they know they have an important role to play that they have yet
to undertake, and we do not understand why. The story here precedes the events
in Syria by years. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyep Erdogan has always been
interested in the Arab world and keen to participate positively in it, but he
began on the wrong foot when he previously agreed to support al-Assad’s Syria in
its foreign battles, as well as enthusiastically supporting Iran with its
nuclear program. He later went on to correct these stances when the truth became
clear.
Erdogan, with his charismatic leadership personality, won over frustrated Arab
hearts firstly during a televised conference in Davos three years ago. At the
time, he issued strong retorts to Israeli President Shimon Peres, launching
attacks on Peres himself and Israel’s policy of occupation. He then threw his
microphone away and angrily left his place, in the name of the Arab cause. This
was followed by Turkey’s decision to send ships along with European activists to
break the Gaza blockade, and when they were attacked by Israeli forces in
international waters, Erdogan threatened and pledged that the Israelis would pay
dearly for the attack on Turkish ships and the killing of Turkish citizens.
Subsequently, his picture was held aloft in Arab demonstrations and he became an
Arab star. However, Erdogan’s error was that he raised Arab expectations and yet
did nothing except cease joint military exercises with Israel.
The biggest disappointment was Syria. The Turkish government adopted strong
positions against the Bashar al-Assad regime and issued consecutive threats
against it, claiming that the Turks would not stand by idly in front of the
massacres being committed. However, Turkey remained idle across the border for
more than a year after the massacres began.
Then it was noticeable that the Turkish Prime Minister, along with his Foreign
Minister, flew to Burma and had their photos taken with displaced Muslims.
Erdogan made promises to them, just as he promised the Syrians and the
Palestinians before. This was two days ahead of the Islamic Summit in Mecca, but
in the end Turkey did nothing. Some commented criticizing that it was just
another public relations campaign.
From Israel to Syria to Burma, Turkey has left many of those who had hung their
hopes on it disappointed. Here we must objectively wonder are we expecting too
much from the Turks are we, as usual, an easy victim? Can the Arabs still be won
over by a few passionate media speeches, as Khomeini and Nasrallah did in the
past? I think it’s a mixture of the two. Erdogan is a populist politician who
knows how to gain the applause of the masses, and for this he wins his political
and electoral battles. At the same time, we, as Arabs, have expectations greater
than Turkey’s ability, or we don’t take its circumstances fully into
consideration.
Erdogan is known for his religious and political moderation, and through his
leadership – whether of his party or the government – he has proven that he
possesses two main attributes: winning over public opinion and at the same time
not getting involved in activities that are beyond Turkey’s ability.
The radical Islamists who came out in their thousands to welcome him at Cairo
airport were later shocked by his political speech commanding them to adopt a
secular political approach to the state, and anger grew towards him in both
Egypt and Tunisia. The truth is that Erdogan and Turkey’s Islamists differ in
their perception of the role of religion and the state compared to their Muslim
Brotherhood and Salafi counterparts in the Arab Spring states. In fact, there is
a wide cultural gap between them, for Erdogan is among the admirers of Ibn
Arabi, whilst the Brotherhood and the Salafis follow Hassan al-Banna and Ibn
Taymiyyah respectively.
There is still a great hope that Turkey under Erdogan will have a significant
role in Syria, and in saving the Syrian people, with greater urgency and
momentum. Turkey is stronger militarily than all the Arab states, and has a
direct border with Syria, unlike Saudi Arabia or Egypt, and therefore it has a
significant interest in changing the regime there to satisfy the majority of the
Syrian people, so as to ensure the stability of the region and Turkey’s
protection.
The hope is that Erdogan’s government expands its activities in support of the
Syrian opposition. We know that they were the first to support the rebels,
without which perhaps the Syrian revolution would be over by now, but we also
know that rumors about Turkey coming under Western pressure to prevent it from
supporting the rebels further are just lies, and the opposite is more likely to
be true. Of course, this does not negate the fact that the countries of the
region and Western governments are not keen to support any extremist or jihadist
Syrian groups, and this is an understandable and justifiable position, but these
groups only represent a small proportion of the total map of the Syrian
revolution. Furthermore, we are aware of Turkey’s complex considerations with
regards to the Syrian issue, and the potentially negative repercussions if it
were to intervene strongly. For example, Iran could create problems inside
Turkey and support the armed Kurdish opposition there, which used to be based in
Syria. Yet Turkey should not be overly concerned with these considerations,
because we know that the fall of the al-Assad regime is in Turkey’s best
interests. A democratic Syrian regime with moderate leaders, and the stability
and unity of Syrian territory rather than the emergence separate Alawite or
Kurdish states are all in the interests of the Turks just as they are in the
interests of the Syrians. Iran and Russia, the al-Assad regime’s current allies,
would simply have to accept to deal with the new Syrian regime and respect
Turkey, which will become a stronger and more positive force as a result.
Al-Shara: Al-Assad’s alternative!
By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat
The Turkish Foreign Minister [Ahmet Davutoglu] claims it is possible that Farouk
al-Shara could replace Bashar al-Assad at the head of a transitional government
that would lead to the end of the conflict in Syria, which has been ongoing for
over 18 months. Davutoglu explained that al-Shara “is a man of reason and
conscience and he has not taken part in the massacres in Syria”, adding that the
Syrian opposition is “inclined to accept” him. Is this possible?
Of course, the fact that this statement was issued by someone of the stature of
the Turkish Foreign Minister means it cannot be ignored, however it is strange
that this proposal [for al-Assad to relinquish power to a deputy] has been put
forward time and again, in different ways, since the Arabs first mobilized
towards the Syrian crisis. Every time al-Assad has flatly rejected it, instead
resorting to superficial measures such as appointing a specialized minister for
dialogue with the opposition. So why are we returning to this proposal once
again now, this time from the Turkish Foreign Minister?
It is clear that officials in our region do not care much for public opinion,
given the magnitude of silence regarding what is happening in our region.
Therefore, logic dictates that the idea of al-Shara heading the transitional
phase in Syria is being re-launched at this time in the hope that it will now be
supported by the Russians and the Iranians, based on the premise that the Syrian
crisis can be stopped by al-Assad stepping down rather than the entire regime
collapsing. In this respect, Arab officials have already intimated that Russian
officials have told them: Why was it acceptable for Mubarak to step down and for
the regime to stay in place in Egypt, whilst the whole regime must go in Syria,
not just al-Assad?
Thus it seems that this proposal is being re-launched to reassure the Russians
and the Iranians that their influence in Syria will not vanish in an instant
[after al-Assad steps down], and that by accepting al-Shara they will be
accepting the least damaging outcome. But the issue is not that simple of
course, especially as the Syrian opposition today does not distinguish between
individual members of the al-Assad regime. We now see accusations being directed
even against al-Assad’s advisors, against the backdrop of the case of former
Lebanese minister Michel Samaha. Furthermore, the Syrian opposition’s genuine
gains on the ground could be compromised through offering concessions to one of
the al-Assad regime’s pillars, Farouk al-Shara. Here I must draw attention to a
striking piece of news, namely the meeting that was held in Amman between the
Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh and the dissident former Syrian Prime
Minister Riyad Hijab. During the meeting, the two discussed “the latest
developments in the Syrian arena” according to the official Jordanian news
agency, which means that the Syrian opposition has other options capable of
taking over the post-Assad phase!
Therefore it is not easy to imagine a solution along the lines of the late Omar
Suleiman’s proposal on behalf of Mubarak in Egypt, because the situation on the
ground in Syria is completely different. If there is indeed an acceptable
proposal for a transitional government then we are yet to find it, and it is yet
to garner public support, for al-Assad is not a rational man and we do not see
any serious indications from Russia and Iran. Here an important question
remains: Are the Turks just trying to say we did everything in our power, but
al-Assad, Iran and Russia did not listen to us? Maybe.
Muslim Persecution of Christians: August, 2012
by Raymond Ibrahim/Originally published by the
Gatestone Institute
October 7, 2012
http://www.raymondibrahim.com/12386/muslim-persecution-of-christians-august-2012
While many people are regularly persecuted by Islam's blasphemy law, one
particular case made August headlines: a 14-year-old Christian girl in Pakistan,
Rimsha Masih, was arrested, accused of burning pages of a Quran. Rioting Muslims
destroyed Christian homes and churches, tore Bibles to pieces and broke crosses,
while calling for the death penalty against her. Because this story made it to
the mainstream media, widespread international condemnation caused Pakistani
authorities to release her recently, not by annulling Pakistan's blasphemy law,
but by finding loopholes, from characterizing the girl as retarded—Islamic law
does not mandate punishment for blasphemers if they are retarded—to the
unprecedented exposure of a Muslim cleric who framed her.
Because this incident prompted a widespread rampage against Pakistan's
Christians, thousands have deserted their homes and are dispossessed. The
Christians from Rimsha's neighborhood, including women and children, fled into
the woods in fear of Muslim retribution, while others were evicted by their
Muslim landlords. A few Christians sleeping overnight on the ground just miles
away from Pakistani government buildings decided to build a church there and
make it their permanent dwelling place. "Here it is not anybody's home, nobody's
land. Let us live here in safety," said one. Another said: "We have cleared this
place with our hands, and we have laid the first foundation of a small church
here. Although this is a mere skeleton made of tree branches, this is the holy
home of God. This should be respected."
Categorized by theme, August's batch of Muslim persecution of Christians around
the world includes (but is not limited to) the following accounts, listed by
theme and in country alphabetical order, not necessarily according to severity.
Jihad Killings and Christian Displacement
Iraq: What Carl Moeller, president of Open Doors, characterized as "religicide,"
continues unabated in the nation that was liberated by U.S. forces a decade ago:
"Christians in cities like Baghdad and Mosul are gripped by terrorism. They are
fleeing in droves. Today [August 16] it was reported that at least 20 people
died in blasts and shootings across the country." Before the toppling of Saddam
Hussein, Mosul was home to some 75,000 Christians, but now the number has
dropped to around 25,000. Christian homes are set on fire, bombs placed in their
cars; other Christian families are receiving letters threatening them to leave
Iraq or be kidnapped or killed.
Ivory Coast: As part of the civil war, Muslim rebels "massacred hundreds and
displaced tens of thousands" of predominantly Christian supporters of Laurent
Gbagbo. Since the attack, when their homes were taken by rebels, some 5,000
predominantly Christian ethnic Guere have been forced to flee into the
ungoverned, inhospitable bush, or to the Catholic mission in Duekoue. The priest
there reported that the mission has also been threatened by "crowds of angry
youths."
Mali: As many as 200,000 Christians are fleeing to Algeria and Mauritania, where
they are seeking a safe haven from Islamic terrorists linked to al-Qaeda, who
have become increasingly active in the northern regions of the nation.
Nigeria: The Islamic terrorist organization Boko Haram [Western Education is a
Sin] continued its jihad [holy war] to purge north Nigeria of all Christians. In
one instance, gunmen murdered a 57-year-old evangelist of a Pentecostal church.
When he was threatened earlier, he had said "I leave everything in the hands of
God."
Syria: Some 12,000 people were blockaded in the predominantly Christian town of
Rableh by anti-government forces; they killed several people trying to leave and
refused the entry of food and medical supplies. Government forces had reportedly
driven out the opposition by August 24. Christians were also given an ultimatum
to leave the nearby cities of Qusayr and Homs, which has been almost entirely
cleansed of its 50,000-60,000 Christian population. The predominantly Christian
part of Aleppo was also hit by heavy fighting earlier this month; and a car bomb
was detonated in the predominantly Christian area of Jaramana, a suburb of
Damascus, as "a crowd of faithful, families, elderly people, women and children,
were heading to the cemetery to bury two young people who had died a day
earlier, on August 27, also victims of an IED. Twelve died (other sources say as
many as 27), including five children, and injuring more than 50 people."
Further, "a family of Armenian Christians was found murdered, and all members of
the family horribly decapitated."
Church Attacks
Azerbaijan: The highest appeals court upheld the decision to close Greater Grace
Church, "the first religious community to be liquidated by a court since the
country's harsh new religion law came into force in 2009." The church,
registered since 1993, had provided a place for Christian worship and teaching
for almost 20 years; and with a congregation of nearly 500, was one of the
larger Protestant churches in the country.
Indonesia: Two churches were the latest to be forcibly closed in West Java:
First, a "large tent" used for services by St. Johannes Baptista Church in Bogor
was sealed off by authorities on August 7. The congregation had been using the
tent since 2006 as a temporary location while they awaited a permit for a proper
building, for which it had applied in 2000. Police threatened to "tear down" the
tent if the Christians continued to use it; the church leader suspects the
hostility is linked to the growth of the congregation, which now numbers around
500. Second, Batak Karo Protestant Church in Bandung was sealed off by
protesters who claimed that the congregation had earlier agreed not to use the
building, even though it now has all necessary permits to hold service.
Kenya: After a fight ensued between the supporters of a Muslim cleric who had
died and the police, a church near the mosque where the funeral was being held
was set on fire, and another church was attacked. Separately, another church was
attacked and looted "by an armed mob," believed to be sympathizers of the
al-Shabaab terrorist organization. In the words of the pastor who witnessed the
pillage, "attackers armed with guns stormed the compound and immediately began
pulling down one iron sheet after another, and soon 60 iron sheets were gone. It
was a terrible sight to watch the walls of the church come down, [but] I could
not shout for help because the attackers could gun me down. Shocked and
dismayed, the church's 60 congregants arrived for worship the next day to find
their church building in ruins." Police were told that there were threats of an
attack and that local Muslims were saying things such as "we do not want
infidels in this area," but did nothing. These latest attacks "came only one
week after al-Shabab militants hurled grenades into the African Inland Church of
Garissa, in eastern Kenya, and opened fire on congregants, killing 17 people,
including 15 worshippers. Grenades were also thrown at the local Catholic
church." More than 14 churches have been attacked in Kenya since April.
Nigeria: Gunmen, probably connected with the jihadi organization Boko Haram,
"stormed the Deeper Life Church, where Christian worshippers were gathered in
prayer, and surrounded the church in the middle of a worship service and opened
fire with AK-47 assault rifles on the worshippers." At least 19 of them were
killed, including the pastor. The following day, an unexploded bomb was
discovered at Revival Church.
Syria: Gunmen attacked the Catholic monastery of Mar Musa, which dates from the
4th century, and is located north of Damascus. None of the monks was hurt,
although the monastery was, in the words of Father Dall'Oglio, "sacked," and
"gunmen stole everything they could steal," including tractors and other
agricultural tools.
Apostasy, Blasphemy, Proselytism
Egypt: A Christian man accused of defaming Islam was arrested after a complaint
in which he was accused of posting opinions in Facebook which insulted Muhammad.
Insults to Islam and the prophet are considered crimes in Egypt under Article
98(f) of the Penal Code, which states: "Confinement for a period of not less
than six months and not exceeding five years… shall be the penalty inflicted on
whoever makes use of religion in propagating, either by words, in writing, or in
any other means, extreme ideas for the purpose of inciting strife, ridiculing or
insulting a heavenly religion or a sect following it, or damaging national
unity."
Pakistan: After a Pakistani flag with the name of "Allah" on it accidentally
blew from a Christian's property to a Muslim's, the Muslim accused the Christian
of deliberately trying to blaspheme the name of Allah. This accusation was
advertised in the local mosques, and prompted enraged Muslims to threaten to
burn down the homes of the 15 Christian families in the area. Also, a Christian
pastor, who had preached among Muslims, some of whom showed interest in
converting, was threatened and subsequently kidnapped.
Tanzania: A 17-year-old girl, Eva Abdullah, who had abandoned Islam three years
ago to convert to Christianity, was sentenced to two years in prison after being
accused of desecrating the Quran. Her parents had disowned her and "a group of
radicals" tried to "persuade" her to renounce her Christian faith. When she
refused, they falsely accused her of desecrating a Quran.
Tunisia: The nation's ruling Islamist party filed a bill to criminalize offenses
against "sacred values." "Crimes" would mandate prison terms and fines for
broadly worded offenses, such as insulting or mocking the "sanctity of
religion." Among other things, the bill also codifies the levels of offense to
religious feelings, including "insults, profanity, derision and representation
of Allah and Mohammed."
Dhimmitude
[General Abuse, Debasement, and Suppression of Non-Muslims as "Tolerated"
Citizens]
Egypt: The nation's jihad organizations dropped leaflets calling on Muslims to
kill Christians wherever they found them. Coptic shop owners who sell Christian
icons and statues received threatening letters. Muslim "gangs" plundered and
kidnapped for ransom Christians. Islamists in the Constituent Assembly demanded
that the Coptic Church's funds be placed under state financial control, a
measure categorically rejected by Copts: the state in no way funds the Church,
even though mosques are funded by taxpayers, including Christians. Condemning
the proposal, the acting Patriarch of the Coptic Orthodox Church said the demand
has only one meaning: "that Copts are clearly persecuted." Despite promising
greater representation for Egypt's Copts, President Morsi broke his word and
allowed only one Copt, a female, to represent the nation's 10-14% Christians in
the newly formed Cabinet: "We had expected an increase in the representation of
Copts especially after the number of ministries increased to 35. But the
formation ignored all the known rights and concepts of citizenship," said the
acting Patriarch: "It is not right that Copts get treated in this way." When
Egypt's Constituent Assembly proposed a law to criminalize "forced labor,
slavery, the trafficking of women and children, human organs, and the sex
trade," from which Christians, especially females, would benefit, the Islamist
party complained.
Iran: According to Mohabat News, authorities "raise[d] unsubstantiated charges"
against five arrested converts to Christianity to "pressure" and "intimidate"
them, including by falsely accusing them of desecrating the Quran, and holding
them for indefinite periods. "Although their situation is still unclear six
months after their arrest, there is no doubt that the Christians' only crime is
related to their faith in Jesus Christ."
Pakistan: Eleven Christian student nurses were poisoned with mercury in their
tea. It is believed that the Christian women were targeted as punishment for
drinking tea while their Muslim colleagues were fasting during the month of
Ramadan. And a 56-year-old Christian woman at the Karachi Press Club recounted
how she and her family were enslaved and forced to work without pay, and
tortured and beaten. Muslim "feudal lords" are threatening her and her extended
family, with, among other charges, accusations of blasphemy: "Please protect
us," they said. "We don't want to go back."
Saudi Arabia: The last of the 35 Ethiopian Christians held in detention since
December after being arrested for holding a prayer meeting in a private home was
deported home: "We have arrived home safe," one of the released said: "We
believe that we are released as the result of the pressure exerted by ICC and
others. The Saudi officials do not tolerate any religions other than Islam. They
consider non-Muslims unbelievers. They are full of hatred towards non-Muslims."
Syria: A number of Melchite Greek Catholic priests, including the archbishop,
fled to Lebanon after their offices were ransacked. According to Fides,
"unidentified groups who want to feed a religious war and drag the Syrian
population into sectarian conflicts" attacked the Christian area in the old
quarter of Aleppo. A Byzantine Christian museum and an office of the Maronite
Christian faith were also damaged.
Turkey: The chairman of Parliament's education committee is accusing the French
government of "planting seeds of hate" with its move to include the Armenian
genocide in history and geography books used in French secondary schools.
Armenia, backed by many historians, says that about 1.5 million Armenians were
killed in what is now eastern Turkey during World War I in a deliberate policy
of genocide ordered by the Ottoman government.
Uzbekistan: A 26-year-old Christian woman, paralyzed from youth, and her mother
were violently attacked by six men with sticks who broke into their home at 4
a.m. The men ransacked the home, confiscating icons, bibles, religious calendars
and prayer books. When the paralyzed woman furtively tried to phone for help,
she was beaten again. They were all taken to the police department, where the
woman was "offered to convert to Islam." She refused, and the judge eventually
"decided that the women had resisted police and had stored the banned religious
literature at home and conducted missionary activities. He fined them 20 minimum
monthly wages each."
About this Series
Because the persecution of Christians in the Islamic world is on its way to
reaching epidemic proportions, "Muslim Persecution of Christians" was developed
to collate some—by no means all—of the instances of persecution that surface
each month. It serves two purposes:
Intrinsically, to document that which the mainstream media does not: the
habitual, if not chronic, Muslim persecution of Christians.
Instrumentally, to show that such persecution is not "random," but systematic
and interrelated—that it is rooted in a worldview inspired by Sharia.
Accordingly, whatever the anecdote of persecution, it typically fits under a
specific theme, including hatred for churches and other Christian symbols;
apostasy and blasphemy laws; sexual abuse of Christian women; forced conversions
to Islam; theft and plunder in lieu of jizya (tribute); overall expectations for
Christians to behave like cowed "dhimmis" (barely tolerated citizens); and
simple violence and murder. Oftentimes it is a combination thereof.
Because these accounts of persecution span different ethnicities, languages, and
locales—from Morocco in the west, to India in the east, and throughout the West,
wherever there are Muslims—it should be clear that one thing alone binds them:
Islam—whether the strict application of Islamic Sharia law, or the supremacist
culture born of it.
Previous Reports
July, 2012
June, 2012
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
Saudi Grand Mufti: Replace Female ID Pictures with
Fingerprints
by Raymond Ibrahim • Oct 7, 2012/Cross-posted from Jihad Watch
http://www.raymondibrahim.com/2012/10/saudi-grand-mufti-replace-female-id-pictures-with
According to a September 27 Masrawy report, because the face (and eyes) of a
woman is deemed a great temptation for Muslim men -- worthy of covering no less
than a woman's vagina, at least according to one Egyptian cleric -- the Grand
Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah Al Sheikh, recently called
for replacing the personal photos of female university students that appear on
their ID cards with their fingerprints, as that "would be best."
Saudi Grand Mufti: No to female portraits
Arab newspapers quoted the Grand Mufti in an interview with Saudi female
students at Taibah University in Medina. Among other things, he also warned
students about the "vocabulary" they use when jesting and against watching
"racy" movies. He also stressed that "Muslim women
have a great impact on the community" citing a number of Quranic verses and
hadiths.
The report does not mention which hadiths, though it is well known that several
hadiths attributed to Islamic prophet Muhammad do stress that females have an
impact society -- but mostly in negative ways, including by likening women to
dogs and donkeys. In the words of Aisha, one of Muhammad's wives:
The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, "Prayer
is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying
people)." I said, 'You have made us (i.e. women) dogs.' I saw the Prophet
praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was
in need of something, I would slip away, for I disliked to face him." -- Sahih
Bukhari 1.9.490
Muslim Egyptian Lawyer and His Sons Attempt to Demolish Church
10-8-2012/Assyrian International News Agency
(AINA) -- Mohammad Mostafa Kamel, a Muslim prosecutor at the Alexandria Criminal
Court, and his two sons, aided by some hired Muslims, broke into the church of
the St. Mary in Rashid at 4 PM today and demolished a great part of its alter.
They came to the church with front loaders. Kamel had
no demolition order. His fight with the church goes
back to 2009 when he tried to take ownership of the church, claiming that he
bought the ancient church, which dates back to the 9th century, from the Greek
Orthodox Church. But it was the Coptic church who bought after it was up for
sale due to the dwindling number of Greeks in Rashid, which is located 65 km (40
mi) east of Alexandria, in Beheira governorate. Father
Maximos of St. Mary's Church said that he rushed to the police station with
Father Luke Asaad and their lawyer to try to bring the police to help. In the
police station the prosecutor and his two sons threatened to kill the two priest
and their lawyer. A police report was filed regarding those threats.
"We stayed at the police station for over six hours with the police
begging prosecutor Kamel and his two sons not to demolish the church," said
father Maximos, "In spite of them not having a demolition order."
Father Luke said that the prosecutor had lost all the cases he brought to
court against the church, "So when this route failed, he tried taking the matter
into his own hands."
The police confiscated the loader but refused to take legal action against him
because he is a prosecutor.
In the attack of 2009, the prosecutor, his sons and their aids demolished the
church fence and injured the church guard.
By Mary Abdelmassih
Copyright (C) 2012, Assyrian International News Agency. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use.