Bible Quotation for today/
Luke 19/41-44: "As he
drew near, he saw the city and wept over it, saying, "If this day you only
knew what makes for peace--but now it is hidden from your eyes. For
the days are coming upon you when your enemies will raise a palisade against
you; they will encircle you and hem you in on all sides. They will smash you
to the ground and your children within you, and they will not leave one
stone upon another within you because you did not recognize the time of your
visitation."
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters
& Releases from miscellaneous sources
March 14 has taken its eye off the ball/By Michael
Young/The Daily Star/November 22/12
Case Against 'Innocence of Muslims' Filmmaker
Raises Eyebrows/by Adam Turner/The Blaze/November
22/12
Latest News Reports From
Miscellaneous Sources for November 22/12
Lebanon marks 69th independence anniversary
President Michel Sleiman urges Dialogue, rules out
poll delays
Yes, but obstacles still remain
Google Doodle Celebrates Lebanon Independence Day
Forces leader Samir Geagea stands firm on boycott
Lebanese Army Dismantles New Rocket Aimed at Israel
Two Rockets Fired from South at Israel, at Least One
Lands in Lebanon
Lebanese MP Ahmed Fatfat MP Snaps Back at Berri,
Describes him as 'Problem' behind Crisis
Hizbullah Calls on Independence Day Lebanese to Commit
to People, Army, Resistance Equation
Canada Welcomes Ceasefire Agreement between Israel and
Hamas
Gaza deal seals major role for Egypt's president
Iron Dome was the only real Israeli winner of the Gaza
operation
Text of Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement
Iron Dome shootdowns of Gaza rockets cost
$25mln-$30mln: Israel
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas hails Gaza PM
'victory' in phonecall: Hamas
Gaza cease-fire takes hold but mistrust runs deep
Israel failed in its goals', thanks Iran: Meshaal
Gaza conflict unveils two faces of Hamas
Public holiday in Gaza to mark truce deal
Gaza war illustrates will for triumph: Nasrallah
Palestinian refugees in Lebanon celebrate Gaza
‘victory’
Lebanese official says 2 rockets fired at Israel
Palestinians have the right to self defense: Jumblatt
Lebanon opposes Syrian refugee camps as crisis grows
FSA establishes new "regular" brigades, prepares for
post-Assad period
Lebanon Is an occupied country, the Occupier is the Axis of Evil
Elias Bejjani 22.11.12/What a shame: It is really an insult for all the free
Lebanese to see that the Lebanese puppet officials are celebrating the so called
independence 69 day. What independence they are celebrating when the Axis of
Evil totally occupied Lebanon and oppresses its people. Shame on these officials
who are mere puppets and have no back bones. Such officials do not represent in
any way the Lebanese people. Shame on all occupied Lebanon's officials,
clergymen and politicians.
Lebanon marks 69th independence anniversary
November 22, 2012/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanon marked the 69th anniversary of the country’s independence
Thursday with an official ceremony in Downtown Beirut.
President Michel Sleiman, Prime Minister Najib Mikati, Parliament Speaker Nabih
Berri, former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and former President Amin Gemayel all
attended the 50-minute Independence Day military parade at Shafiq Wazzan Avenue
in Downtown Beirut Thursday morning.
Streets leading to the area were cordoned off for the ceremony, which was also
attended by Defense Minister Fayez Ghosn, Lebanese Army commander Gen. Jean
Kahwagi, Internal Security Forces Commander Maj. Gen. Ashraf Rifi, and a number
of Lebanese dignitaries and lawmakers of both the March 8 and March 14 camps.
A 21-gun salute was fired at the start of the parade after which Sleiman laid a
wreath at the tomb of the Unknown Soldier. A helicopter show greeted Sleiman's
motorcade upon arrival, while infantry and navy commandos took part in the
parade.
At the end of the parade, Sleiman, Berri and Mikati headed to the presidential
palace in Baabda to receive well-wishers.
The celebration comes amid deep tension between Lebanon’s Hezbollah-led March 8
and the March14-led opposition since the Oct. 19 assassination of Brig. Gen.
Wissam al-Hasan.
March 14, who accuse Syria of the killing and hold Mikati responsible, declared
a boycott of the Cabinet shortly after the incident and set its resignation as a
precondition to resume dialogue.
In his independence address Wednesday evening, President Sleiman renewed his
calls for the rival factions to resume dialogue and pledged the coming 2013
parliamentary polls will be held on time.
“Dialogue is needed at all times and circumstances, especially at this
particular phase in order to find practical and acceptable solutions to end the
state of tension and anxiety that has existed across the country since the
assassination of Hasan,” Sleiman said.
President Michel Sleiman urges Dialogue, rules out poll delays
November 22, 2012 /By Hussein Dakroub
The Daily Star
BEIRUT: President Michel Sleiman Wednesday took direct swipes at the rival
factions’ stance on National Dialogue, renewing his call for all-party talks
aimed at defusing tension and preserving stability in a country sharply split
over the 20-month-old bloody conflict in Syria.
Addressing the nation in a televised speech ahead of Thursday’s 69th anniversary
of Lebanon’s independence from France, Sleiman pledged that next year’s
parliamentary elections would he held on time.
He emphasized the need for the Lebanese to engage in dialogue in order to
overcome difficulties facing the country, allay the citizens’ fears about the
future and restore confidence in Lebanon.
“Fellow Lebanese, we must return at all times and circumstances to the logic of
dialogue and the method of moderation in order to help the ongoing consultations
find practical and acceptable solutions to end the state of tension and anxiety
that has existed across the country since the assassination of martyr Wissam al-Hasan,”
Sleiman said.
“In parallel, we are working relentlessly to unveil and prosecute the
individuals responsible for this heinous crime, and everyone who was behind
shaking security, destabilizing the country and harming innocent citizens,” he
added.
Sleiman called on the rival factions to accept his call for National Dialogue
with an open heart in order to resolve the political crisis triggered by last
month’s assassination of Hasan, chief of the police’s Information Branch, in a
car bombing in the Beirut district of Ashrafieh.
“Necessity and duty impose upon all parties in such delicate circumstances to
embrace dialogue open-heartedly and honestly, rather than searching for pretexts
and arguments to paralyze this dialogue or bind it with preconditions, or being
skeptical about the eligibility and patriotism of the interlocutors,” he said.
Sleiman has been pressing to convene a new round of National Dialogue, scheduled
on Nov. 29, to explore a solution for the political crisis. However, the
opposition March 14 parties have demanded the resignation of the government as a
condition for attending any Dialogue session.
In a speech Monday, Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah indirectly accused
the Lebanese Forces of collaborating with Israel during Lebanon’s 1975-90 Civil
War and of being involved in several crimes during the conflict. LF leader Samir
Geagea has rejected Nasrallah’s accusations.
Sleiman called on the March 8 and March 14 parties to abide by the Baabda
Declaration to defuse tension.
“It all begins with a strict commitment to the provisions and spirit of the
Baabda Declaration in order to distance Lebanon from regional conflicts, prevent
its use as a platform to smuggle arms or armed persons,” he said. The Baabda
Declaration agreed by rival March 8 and March 14 leaders at the June 11 National
Dialogue meeting called for “keeping Lebanon away from the policy of regional
and international conflicts and sparing it the negative repercussions of
regional tensions and crises.” Despite the Baabda Declaration, Sleiman said,
“some have not hesitated, for various motives, namely sympathy or dependence, to
get involved in different ways in the logic of regional violence, and to expose
Lebanon to the dangers of slipping into the abyss of strife.”
He referred to clashes between supporters and opponents of Syrian President
Bashar Assad in Tripoli, the kidnapping of Syrian and Turkish citizens in Beirut
and the discovery of explosives designed to destabilize Lebanon. Calling for “a
new modern electoral law,” he said the parliamentary elections would be held on
time in the spring of 2013.
“As for the upcoming legislative elections, how can we allow them to become a
destabilizing factor while we have proudly boasted in this East about our
democratic tradition, the core of which being the periodic peaceful rotation of
power?” Sleiman asked. “How can we ignore them and refrain from holding them, at
a time when elections have become the characteristic of the Arab states which
are groping their way toward democracy?
“Therefore, we have set our mind on respecting all the constitutional deadlines,
and holding the parliamentary elections on time,” he added. “Our choice has been
democracy since independence.”
We condemn them all
November 19, 2012
Hassan Nasrallah has told us ad nauseam that if we are not with the Resistance
then we are with Israel. In the Hezbollah secretary general’s world, there are
no shades. You are either with him or you are with the “enemy.” It is the
rhetoric of the bully and an argument that allowed Nasrallah to take Lebanon
into a war it didn’t want in the summer of 2006. It allowed him to justify the
deaths of over 1,000 Lebanese, the temporary displacement of 1 million people
and the billions of dollars lost to damaged infrastructure and the economy as a
whole.
It is based on this warped logic that he was able to claim his “divine victory.”
Those of us who were not drinking the Hezbollah Kool Aid and pointed out that it
was a victory we would have happily done without were looked upon with
suspicion. But one idea that he is clearly reluctant to entertain is that it is
possible to reject all sides, be they Israel, Hezbollah and even Hamas.
Having no time for Israel is hardly a difficult call. It is, after all, a state
built on the land of an evicted people. One million people were displaced, while
decades of repression were visited among those who remained. It led to wars,
civil conflict and instability. When Israel unleashes death and destruction upon
innocents, we can do nothing but condemn it.
But this does not mean that we must automatically embrace Hezbollah’s fiendish,
not to mention fraudulent, ideology just because it is founded on the basis of
conflict with Israel, a nation that is knee-deep in the swamp of wickedness.
Hezbollah’s core business is opposing Israel at the expense of the integrity of
the Lebanese state and the aspirations of its people. This, its increasingly
unapologetic relationship with Iran and the alarming ease with which it
brandishes its supposedly sacred arsenal to achieve domestic ends, should be
equally worrying to most Lebanese. Because as long as Hezbollah maintains its
martial posture in an increasingly volatile region, then Lebanon once again
risks Israel’s appalling fury.
The same argument can be applied to Gaza, where the people are once again
suffering from the twin effects of devastating and disproportionate Israeli
aggression and the corrosive legacy of living under the albeit
democratically-elected Hamas, a party whose agenda is sadly more focused on the
quixotic idea of the liberation of Palestine than serious long-term growth.
The Israeli culture of repression may have created the conditions for Hamas to
thrive, but those of us who lament the absence of progressive governments with
long-term visions for the region know that the people of Gaza ultimately deserve
better. Hamas and Hezbollah are cut from similar cloth, and Israel’s catalogue
of war crimes and human rights abuses should never be allowed to overshadow
their shortcomings. Nasrallah must not be allowed to feel he has a monopoly on
morality. We must remind those who have been feeding at the March 8 trough that
the vast majority of Lebanese who believe in democracy, prosperity,
transparency, the rule of law, the sanctity of the state, independence,
sovereignty, freedom of speech and human rights, condemn six decades of Israeli
repression.
Wrong is wrong.
Yes, but obstacles still remain
Now Lebanon/November 22, 2012
Our destiny is in our hands. It is up to us to seize it. Today, Lebanon
celebrates 69 years of independence. And while the cynics might argue that
during a huge tranche of that period many of the country’s 61 governments –
that’s almost a government a year – have been cowed by war, occupation by Israel
and Syria, and the malignant influence of not only the PLO and Hezbollah, but
over a dozen militias and private armies, the country should take heart that it
is still around to celebrate that day in November 1943 when it finally broke
away from the shackles of French mandate rule.
This has not happened because of our sense of unity. God knows our sectarian
spread has been as much our curse as it has also been called our special
characteristic. The Lebanese have been unable to work together in the way
regular nations can, and yet it is the very belief in the notion of Lebanon –
albeit different things to different people – that has ensured that we have kept
alive the idea, if not the smooth-running, of what is without doubt a special,
not to mention frustrating, country.
That said, Lebanon is still crisscrossed with political and sectarian fault
lines. At any moment, we might shudder on the edge of the existential abyss. And
this year, as the region’s tectonic plates ominously grind away, Lebanon is once
again in the troughs of political, social and economic despair with critical
issues standing in the way of any wholehearted sense of independence.
Paramount among them is the insidious influence of Iran. Only the ostriches will
deny the unquestioning role Hezbollah plays in Tehran’s regional master plan and
its increasingly dangerous confrontation with Israel, a standoff that has been
the biggest threat to regional peace for decades.
Recent proof of Iran’s shameless interference in our affairs was highlighted by
the admission of Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Miqati that Iran saw the images
taken by Hezbollah’s pilotless drone over Israel before the Lebanese did. True,
Hezbollah should never have taken it upon itself to launch the drone in the
first place but, while we condemn them, we have grown used to, not to mention
powerless to stop, the Party of God’s unilateral acts of recklessness. This
latest revelation is not only a slap in the face of the country Hezbollah claims
to put before all else, but it is also surely the definitive proof where its
allegiances have always lain.
Equally worrying is the inescapable fact that we live in a country where one
party, Hezbollah – it’s funny how the same name keeps cropping up – can steer
politics to its own advantage by dint of its huge arsenal, one bigger than that
of the national army – and that all Lebanese know the party it is more than
capable of using weapons to achieve political goals. With such a state of
affairs, no country can claim to be able to bask in the full sunshine of a
genuine state of independence.
Then we have the ever-present and cancerous influence of Syria, a nation many
Lebanese, including a significant proportion of the current government,
nonetheless believe is a “brotherly country” that can have a beneficial
influence in shaping Lebanon’s future. They forget the 29 years of Syrian
occupation, three decades that were defined by fear, extortion, repression,
rendition and politically sanctioned killings. And yet this current government,
or at least part of it, sees part of its remit as protecting Syrian interests in
Lebanon, all under the guise of a policy of disassociation in Syria’s
increasingly messy civil war. The sooner we expunge direct Syrian influence from
the cabinet, the more “independent” we will feel.
Finally, we cannot claim to be truly autonomous if we cannot control our own
borders. Hezbollah’s control of south Lebanon is a well documented obstacle to
full statehood, but our still un-demarcated boundary with Syria, one that is
subject to territorial violations on an almost daily basis, must be resolved
with the help of the international community.
Independence is not just simply being a sovereign nation that can take its seat
at the United Nations. For Lebanon, it means eradicating the last vestiges of
regional and international opportunism that have consistently sought to exploit
our soft sectarian underbelly and thriving on our own steam and on our natural
instincts. If we can do this, we can be the vibrant, prosperous nation whose
exciting potential the world has had only teasing glimpses of. Our destiny is in
our hands. It is up to us to seize it.
Iron Dome was the only real Israeli winner of the
Gaza operation
DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis November 21, 2012/The trio which conducted Israel’s
eight-day Gaza operation, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister
Ehud Barak, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, marked the Gaza ceasefire that
went into effect Wednesday night, Nov. 21, by announcing that all the goals set
for the Pillar of Cloud operation were achieved.
They did not reveal the concessions they made to enable the US and Egypt to
persuade Hamas to promise to halt its long missile blitz against Israel. The
most damaging was Israel’s consent for Egypt to act as truce monitor and
arbitrator between itself and Hamas and the address for complaints of
violations, misunderstandings and broker of future negotiations to follow the
ceasefire for regulating future relations.
By deferring to Egypt’s superior authority, Israel let itself be demoted to an
equal footing with Hamas, a group listed as a terrorist organization in the US
and Europe and dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state. In some
respects, Israel might have been better served by direct talks with Hamas itself
rather than placing its strategic policy on two borders in the hands of the
Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.
As of 9 pm, Nov. 21, Israel’s security actions on its borders with Egypt and the
Gaza Strip must be adjusted to staying on Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi’s
good side.
Netanyahu and Barak’s advisers defend this concession by maintaining that it is
superseded by Morsi’s dependence on Washington for the sake of American aid
grants and guarantees for international credit to rescue Egypt’s economy from
collapse. Cairo will be in the hands of the Obama administration and so Israel
has nothing to worry about, they say.
However reasonable this argument may sound, debkafile’s analysts say it has
nothing to do with Egyptian-Israeli relations which operate on a separate plane.
It is a fact that Barack Obama never managed to persuade Egypt to resume its gas
supplies to Israel after the Sinai pipelines were repeatedly sabotaged, or raise
a finger to halt the arms smuggling traffic running through its territory to the
Gaza Strip from Libya and Sudan.Washington has very little influence on the
Muslim Brothers when it comes to Cairo’s attitude towards Israel. They are far
from being American puppets. President Morsi may heed US wishes up to a point
with regard to the Gaza Strip and the Palestinian terrorists ruling the enclave,
but the Brothers will prefer to line up with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf
emirates and follow the gospel of their radical guru, Sheikh Yousuf Qaradawi,
the great champion of suicide terrorism against Israel.
Israel has gained substantially less than Defense Minister Barak claimed from
the eight-day air operation launched to rescue southern Israel from the 12-year
old Palestinian missile war waged from Gaza .
Hamas undoubtedly took a heavy beating and devastating damage to its command and
control, military infrastructure, arms manufacturing and arsenal. But its
15,000-strong militia remains largely intact after losing 50 men and can be
reconstituted. In any case, Operation Pillar of Cloud was not meant to be a
military contest between the IDF and the Hamas military wing. What it finally
boiled down to was a duel between the Iranian weapons wielded by Hamas and Jihad
Islami and Israel’s Iron Dome missile interceptor.
Iron Dome came out of the ordeal the unchallenged victor. With that success in
hand, Israel had no need to get into negotiations with Hamas and Jihad Islami
over a ceasefire, which neither of the two organizations is expected to honor. A
unilateral ceasefire declaration from Jerusalem would have been enough. And in
fact two hours after the ceasefire went into effect, Hamas had fired some 12
rockets against Israel. Schools in the south will remain closed Thursday.
Text of Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement
November 21, 2012 /Daily Star
CAIRO: Israel and Hamas agreed Wednesday to an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire
accord to end a week of violence in and around the Gaza Strip following days of
marathon talks.
Here is the text of the ceasefire agreement which is set to take effect at 1900
GMT:
"Israel shall stop all hostilities in the Gaza Strip land sea and air, including
incursions and targeting of individuals.
"All Palestinian factions shall stop all hostilities from the Gaza Strip against
Israel, including rocket attacks and all attacks along the border.
"Opening the crossings and facilitating the movement of people and transfer of
goods and refraining from restricting residents' free movements and targeting
residents in border areas. Procedures of implementation shall be dealt with
after 24 hours from the start of the ceasefire.
"Other matters as may be requested shall be addressed."
"Implementation mechanism. "Setting up the zero hour understanding to enter into
effect.
"Egypt shall receive assurances from each party that the party commits to what
was agreed upon.
"Each party shall commit itself not to perform any acts that would breach this
understanding. In case of any observations, Egypt as a sponsor of this
understanding, shall be informed to follow up."
Palestinians have the right to self defense:
Jumblatt
November 22, 2012/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Palestinians have the right to defend themselves by all possible means,
Progressive Socialist Party Leader MP Walid Jumblatt said in remarks published
Thursday.
“The Palestinian people have the right to defend itself themselves by all
possible means and ways,” Jumblatt, who spoke to Al-Joumhouria, said. His
comments come after a bus exploded in Tel Aviv, Israel, near the near the
defense ministry's headquarters, and wounded at least 17 Israelis.“When the
massacres against the Palestinian civilians stop, the bombings that target
Israeli civilians will stop,” Jumblatt said.
The PSP leader also held the United Nations Security Council responsible for not
taking enough measures to defend Palestinians.
“When will the Security Council seriously pay attention to the Palestinian cause
and give the Palestinian people their right to have their own state and the
refugees the right to return [to their homeland]?” Jumblatt asked. Following
days of marathon talks, Israel and Hamas finally agreed Wednesday to an
Egyptian-brokered ceasefire accord to end a week of violence in and around the
Gaza Strip.
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas hails Gaza PM
'victory' in phonecall: Hamas
November 22, 2012/Daily Star /GAZA CITY, Palestinian Territoriess: Palestinian
president Mahmud Abbas spoke by telephone on Thursday with Gaza's Hamas premier
Ismail Haniya and congratulated him on his "victory," a Hamas statement said.
"In a telephone conversation, president Abu Mazen (Abbas) congratulated prime
minister Ismail Haniya of Hamas on his victory and offered condolences for the
martyrs," a statement from the Gazan leader's office said. Official Palestinian
new agency Wafa said: "The president received a phone call from brother Haniya
who informed him of the situation in Gaza after the ceasefire."The president
saluted (the Palestinian) steadfastness in face of the aggression and stressed
the importance of reaching a ceasefire and sparing Gaza the scourge of war,"
Wafa said, adding: "The president supports the efforts to strengthen national
unity."In addition, Haniya and two other senior Hamas officials -- Ahmed Bahar
and Mohammed al-Hindi -- expressed their "support for the national drive for
observer status from the UN on November 29," Wafa said.
Lebanese official says 2 rockets fired at Israel
November 21, 2012/By Zeina Karam/Daily Star/BEIRUT: A senior Lebanese security
official says two rockets have been fired from Lebanon toward Israel but fell
short. The official says the rockets were fired from southern Lebanon on
Wednesday. They landed near the border on Lebanese territory, the official said.
He did not say who fired them. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in
line with military regulations. This week Lebanese officials found and disarmed
two rockets aimed at Israel. The two incidents coincide with a weeklong conflict
between Hamas militants in Gaza and Israeli forces.
In 2008, during the last Israeli offensive there, several rockets were fired
from Lebanon at Israel, provoking a brief Israeli artillery response. South
Lebanon is considered a stronghold of Hezbollah militants, who fought Israel to
a stalemate in 2006.
Israel failed in its goals', thanks Iran: Meshaal
November 21, 2012/Daily Star/CAIRO: Hamas chief Khaled Meshaal said on Wednesday
that Israel had "failed in all its goals" after a Gaza truce deal came into
effect, while thanking Iran for its support during the conflict. "After eight
days, God stayed their hand from the people of Gaza, and they were compelled to
submit to the conditions of the resistance," Meshaal said.
"Israel has failed in all its goals," he told reporters in a Cairo hotel.
Meshaal also thanked ceasefire mediator Egypt, as well as Iran, which he said
"had a role in arming" Hamas during the conflict.
Gaza conflict unveils two faces of Hamas
November 21, 2012/By Selim Saheb Ettaba
Daily Star/GAZA CITY: A car drags the body of an executed "collaborator" through
Gaza City, streets away from where a team of foreign dignitaries come to show
solidarity with Gazans under Israeli fire.
The scene served to highlight the two faces of the Palestinian Islamist movement
Hamas which rules the Gaza Strip.
Hamas, faced with Western diplomatic isolation despite its 2006 election
triumph, has played up the successive high-level foreign visits since the
November 14 launch of Israel's deadly nslaught on the Palestinian territory. To
the sound of celebratory honking of car horns, the bare-footed body of the young
man was strung to a back bumper and paraded in a convoy led by motorbikes
through the Nasser district of Gaza City, an AFP journalist said. Gunmen
executed six alleged collaborators with Israel on Tuesday, witnesses said,
adding that notices were pinned to their bodies saying they had been killed by
Hamas's armed wing, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades. "Gunmen in a minibus pulled
up in the neighbourhood, pushed six men out and shot them without leaving the
vehicle," one of the witnesses said.
The witness, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the message pinned
to the bodies read: "Al-Qassam Brigades announces the execution of the
traitors."
The message said the men were killed "for their participation in providing
information about the capabilities of the resistance and their factions and
giving the enemy information about the movement of the fighters." The men, the
message added, "contributed to the martyrdom of many fighters by reporting their
position." One of them was dragged through the streets behind a motorbike, as
seen in a photograph distributed by AFP. The scene was played out a few streets
from the Dallu family home where, after the roads had been washed of blood,
Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniya hosted an Arab League delegation led by
secretary general Nabil al-Arabi. "Here's the legitimate Palestinian prime
minister Ismail Haniya," a Hamas spokesman announced on a loudspeaker, listing
the guests, among them Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and his Egyptian
and Saudi counterparts. "This is the prime minister rejected by Israel and the
United States," he declared, as the foreign dignitaries made their way through
the dense crowd under the watchful eyes of their bodyguards. They struggled to
reach friends of the family, at least eight of whose members were killed when an
Israeli air strike destroyed their home last Sunday, seated next to the ruins to
pay condolences. The visitors then made their way to Gaza City's main Al-Shifa
hospital, where scenes of chaos broke out on their arrival and the bodies of the
six "collaborators" were kept out of sight in the morgue.
Lebanon opposes Syrian refugee camps as crisis grows
November 22, 2012/By Serene Assir/Daily Star
HALBA, Lebanon: Thousands of Syrian refugees in Lebanon are urgently seeking
temporary shelter similar to the camps set up in Turkey and Jordan, but with its
troubled history of refugees, Beirut and the UN reject the idea. "If no camp or
emergency solution is provided, families will end up sleeping on the streets, or
returning to Syria," said Ayman al-Hariri, a Syrian activist in Lebanon's
northern province of Akkar, where tens of thousands of refugees are currently
based. "Nobody wants to live in a camp, but most cannot pay $200 to $300 rent
each month (155 to 235 euros). It would also help organise aid," said Hariri.
"Right now it's chaos, and the most vulnerable families pay the highest price."
There are already more than 125,000 Syrian refugees in Lebanon, 78 percent of
them women and children, according to UN figures, though activists say the real
number is much higher, and thousands continue to stream across the border.
Some 30 percent of those who fled the conflict are relying on families in the
north to host them. The rest struggle to put a roof over their heads, and say
temporary accommodation is desperately needed.
But Lebanon's existing Palestinian refugee camps have seen repeated outbreaks of
violence -- the presence of Palestinians was a major destabilising factor during
the 1975-1990 civil war -- and the authorities are afraid of encouraging Syrians
to settle permanently.
Many Lebanese Shiites and Christians believe the new influx may upset the
delicate sectarian balance in a country of just four million, with most of the
Syrian arrivals Sunni Muslim, like the Palestinians.
"We don't know where many of the Syrians are living," Said al-Halabi, the mayor
of Halba in Akkar province, told AFP. "If they had a camp, it would be easier to
keep order."
As violence in neighbouring Syria drags on, some 20,000 new refugees arrive in
Lebanon each month, according to the UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Lebanon,
Robert Watkins.
The United Nations and the Lebanese authorities are assisting local communities
hosting Syrians, while aiming to promote development.
"The policy of the United Nations, and in coordination with the government of
Lebanon, is that it is not advisable at this time," Watkins told journalists in
Halba, when asked whether new camps might alleviate the refugees' plight. "Camps
create many more problems than they solve, and they are also incredibly
expensive to maintain," he added.
The severe funding shortage over the Syrian humanitarian crisis is a major
concern for the United Nations, with UNICEF facing a 57 percent funding gap in
its Lebanon programme for Syrian children, and other agencies seeing similar
problems.
'Sweeping the problem under the carpet'
Meanwhile, with bitter memories of the armed presence of Palestinians from the
mid-1970s onwards, many ordinary Lebanese oppose the camps, including in the
northern city of Tripoli.
"If we had camps, the Syrian refugees would do what the Palestinians did. They'd
become emperors on our land," said 28-year-old Sharif al-Naimi, who sells
watches in Tripoli.
Fearing a replay of the Palestinian problem, the government is also firmly
opposed to setting up camps for the Syrians.
"There is no discussion whatsoever of opening any camp," said Michel Moussa, a
pro-Damascus Lebanese MP. "We do not believe a camp preserves anybody's rights."
Despite its attempts to remain neutral over the conflict, Lebanon's political
parties are deeply divided over the Syrian crisis.
Hezbollah and its allies, which hold the majority in government, support the
regime of President Bashar al-Assad, with the March 14 movement led by former
premier Saad Hariri backing the 20-month revolt. A 27-year-old Syrian vegetable
seller in Tripoli believes Lebanon's political divisions explain why no
long-term solution to the refugee problem is in sight.
"Most people arriving in Lebanon are women and children, and they come with
hardly any money or belongings. How are they expected to take care of
themselves?" said Abdo, who travelled to Lebanon from the embattled Aleppo
countryside five months ago. "A camp is a good idea. But Lebanon is so torn
about Syria that the government does not care if people sleep in the cold. They
just want to sweep the problem under the carpet."
Gaza cease-fire takes hold but mistrust runs deep
November 22, 2012/Daily Star
By Alistair Lyon, Nidal al-Mughrabi
GAZA/JERUSALEM: A cease-fire between Israel and Gaza's Hamas rulers took hold on
Thursday after eight days of conflict, although deep mistrust on both sides cast
doubt on how long the Egyptian-sponsored deal can last. Quiet reigned on both
sides of the frontier overnight and during the morning after a dozen rockets
landed in Israel in the initial hours after the truce came into force late on
Wednesday. Israeli police said there had been no casualties or damage. The deal
brokered by Egypt's new Islamist government, working with the United States,
prevented - at least for the moment - an Israeli invasion of the Palestinian
enclave. Gaza medical officials said 162 Palestinians, more than half of them
civilians, including 37 children and 11 women, were killed. Nearly 1,400 rockets
were fired into Israel, killing four civilians and a soldier, the Israeli
military said.
Israel's defence minister said Israel dropped 1,000 times as much explosive on
the Gaza Strip as had landed in Israel.
Municipal workers in Gaza began cleaning streets and removing the rubble of
buildings bombed in Israel's air strikes. Stores opened and people flocked to
markets to buy food.
"Israel learnt a lesson it will never forget," said 51-year-old Khalil al-Rass
from Beach refugee camp in the city of Gaza.
In rocket-hit towns in southern Israel, schools remained closed as a precaution.
Nerves were jangled when warning sirens sounded, in what the military quickly
said was a false alarm.
Trust was in short supply. The exile leader of Hamas, Khaled Meshaal, said his
Islamist movement would respect the truce if Israel did, but would respond to
any violations. "If Israel complies, we are compliant. If it does not comply,
our hands are on the trigger," he told a news conference in Cairo.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had agreed to "exhaust this
opportunity for an extended truce", but told his people a tougher approach might
be required in the future.
Facing a national election in two months, he swiftly came under fire from
opposition politicians who rallied to his side during the fighting but now
contend he emerged from the conflict with no real gains for Israel. "You don't
settle with terrorism, you defeat it. And unfortunately, a decisive victory has
not been achieved and we did not recharge our deterrence," Shaul Mofaz, leader
of the main opposition Kadima party, wrote on his Facebook page.
BLOCKADE
If the truce holds, it will give the 1.7 million Gazans respite from days of air
strikes and halt rocket salvoes from militants that have unnerved a million
people in southern Israel and reached Tel Aviv and Jerusalem for the first time.
Both sides quickly began offering differing interpretations of the cease-fire,
which highlighted the many actual or potential areas of discord.
According to a text of the agreement seen by Reuters, both sides should halt all
hostilities, with Israel desisting from incursions and targeting of individuals,
while all Palestinian factions should cease rocket fire and cross-border
attacks.
The deal also provides for easing Israeli restrictions on Gaza's residents, who
live in what British Prime Minister David Cameron has called an "open prison".
The text said procedures for implementing this would be "dealt with after 24
hours from the start of the cease-fire".
Israeli sources said Israel would not lift a blockade of the enclave it enforced
after Hamas, which preaches the Jewish state's destruction, won a Palestinian
election in 2006.
However, Meshaal said the deal covered the opening of all of the territory's
border crossings. "The document stipulates the opening of the crossings, all the
crossings, and not just Rafah," he said. Israel, trying to stop Hamas arming
itself, controls all entry to Gaza apart from one crossing with Egypt.
Israel let dozens of trucks carry supplies into the Palestinian enclave during
the fighting. Residents there have long complained that Israeli restrictions
blight their economy.
HAMAS HOLIDAY
Meshaal thanked Egypt for mediating and praised Iran for providing Gazans with
financing and arms. "We have come out of this battle with our heads up high," he
said, adding that Israel had been defeated and failed in its "adventure".
Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak said Hamas had suffered a heavy military
blow, including the death of its top commander, killed in an air strike at the
start of the operation on Nov. 14 and the deal merely let Hamas surrender while
saving face.
"A large part of the mid-range rockets were destroyed. Hamas managed to hit
Israel's built-up areas with around a tonne of explosives, and Gaza targets got
around 1,000 tonnes," Barak told Israel Radio.
"So whoever misses what is happening in Gaza does not understand that this
entire agreement is a paper bridge for the defeated so that they can explain to
their public how they can even show their faces after what they were hit with
for a week."
Hamas declared Nov. 22 a national holiday marking "the victory of the
resistance". Its spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, said: "Resistance has achieved and
has imposed a new formula - if you hit Gaza, we will hit Tel Aviv and beyond Tel
Aviv.
Some Israelis staged protests against the deal, notably in the southern town of
Kiryat Malachi, where three civilians were killed by a rocket from Gaza last
week, army radio said.
Interviewed on Israel's Army Radio, Barak dismissed a cease-fire text published
by Hamas as "a piece of paper which I don't remember anyone going around with -
there's no signature on it".
He appeared to confirm, however, a key Hamas claim that the Israelis would no
longer enforce a no-go zone on the Gaza side of the frontier that the army says
has prevented Hamas raids:
"If there are no attacks along the border ... then I tell you that there is no
problem with them working the farmland on the perimeter up to the fence," Barak
said.
But should the Palestinians exploit such measures to breach the truce, Israel
would be "free to act," he said, adding: "The right to self-defence trumps any
piece of paper."
CAIRO
Egypt, an important U.S. ally now under Islamist leadership, took centre stage
in diplomacy to halt the bloodshed. Cairo has walked a fine line between
sympathies for Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood that produced
President Mohamed Mursi and much of his government, and preserving its 1979
peace treaty with Israel and its ties with Washington, its main aid donor.
Announcing the agreement in Cairo, Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Kamel Amr
said mediation had "resulted in understandings to cease fire, restore calm and
halt the bloodshed".
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, standing beside Amr, thanked Mursi for
peace efforts that showed "responsibility, leadership" in the region.
Gaza erupted in a Middle East already shaken by last year's Arab revolts that
toppled several veteran U.S.-backed leaders, including Egypt's Hosni Mubarak,
and by a civil war in Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad is fighting for
survival.
Israel, the United States and the European Union all classify Hamas as a
terrorist organisation over its refusal to recognise Israel, renounce violence
and accept existing interim Palestinian-Israeli peace deal.
But its stance is popular with many Palestinians and has kept the movement
competitive with the secular Fatah movement of President Mahmoud Abbas, who
remains in the occupied West Bank after losing Gaza to Hamas in a civil war five
years ago.
The cease-fire was forged despite a bus-bomb explosion that wounded 15 Israelis
in Tel Aviv on Wednesday and Israeli air strikes that killed 10 people in Gaza.
It was the first serious bombing in Israel's commercial capital since 2006.
There was no claim of responsibility, though Hamas praised the attack.
Israeli forces detained 55 suspected militants in the West Bank on Thursday, the
military said, citing a need to prevent "the infiltration of terrorists into
Israeli communities".
Palestinian refugees in Lebanon celebrate Gaza ‘victory’
November 22, 2012 /By Mohammad Zaatari/The Daily Star
SIDON, Lebanon: Palestinians in the refugee camp of Ain al-Hilweh in south
Lebanon celebrated Thursday the “victory” of Gaza after a week of violence in
and around the Gaza Strip.
The Palestinian Women’s Union organized a rally to celebrate Gaza’s “victory,”
while refugees inside and on the outskirts of the camp were dancing and singing
and raising Palestinian flags.
The women’s rally was originally scheduled to deplore the aggression against
Gaza, however after a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas was reached Wednesday,
the occasion turned into a celebration.
Participants raised banners calling for the solidarity of Palestinian factions
and the unity of the country to face Israel.
“We have won in Gaza and this is only the beginning,” said Amina Jibril, head of
the Palestinian Women Union.
“We haven’t just won through rockets. The kids and women and civilians who were
killed in the clashes were resisting every day because their mere presence in
Gaza is an act of resistance itself,” said Jibril.
Meanwhile, Hamas organized a small exhibition facing Khaled Bin al-Walid Mosque
in the area, where it put out models of the Fajr 5 rockets.
Children inspected the rockets and began asking questions about them. In
response to a question by one of the children on whether the Fajr 5 is
Palestinian made, one of Hamas members said “It doesn’t matter if these rockets
were Palestinian, Iranian or Arab made, what matters is that they terrorized the
enemy.”
Also present at the exhibition, Palestinian woman, Ahlam Wardeh, said that “the
victory achieved today in Gaza should have taken place long ago. I am so amazed
by this Fajr 5 rocket that terrorized Israel and made it close its airport.”She
added that the Palestinians have proved to be strong, and that should have been
proved a long time, “because only the strong earns respect,” according to Wardeh.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb)
Google Doodle Celebrates Lebanon
Independence Day/Naharnet /Google celebrated the 69th anniversary of
Independence Day of Lebanon on Thursday, with a homepage doodle featuring the
temple of Jupiter in Baalbeck.
Lebanon celebrated Independence Day on November 22 marking 69 years of
independence with an official ceremony staged in downtown Beirut.
Streets leading to the area were cordoned off for the ceremony which was
attended by President Michel Suleiman, Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Najib
Miqati, diplomats and other dignitaries.
During the Independence Day parade, hundreds of red, white and green balloons
were launched skywards after military helicopters overflew marching soldiers.
The Lebanese Independence Day is a national day celebrated in remembrance of the
1943 liberation from the French Mandate which was exercised over Lebanese soil
for over 23 years.
Lebanese MP Ahmed Fatfat MP Snaps Back at Berri, Describes him as 'Problem'
behind Crisis
Naharnet/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc MP Ahmed Fatfat lashed out at Speaker
Nabih Berri, considering him the reason behind the country's political crisis.
“He (Berri) is the problem, especially regarding his provocative approach with
us (the March 14 alliance) in the parliament,” Fatfat said in comments published
in al-Liwaa newspaper.
Berri criticized the opposition after accusations that he was seeking to push it
into the “trap” of attending parliamentary sessions despite vows by the
coalition to boycott legislative activity that the cabinet takes part in. The
coalition decided not attend two legislative sessions that Berri called for to
welcome the Armenian president and to show solidarity with the Palestinian
people against the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip. The lawmaker described
a statement by Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat, who said
that he is in a centrist alliance with President Michel Suleiman, Prime Minister
Najib Miqati and Berri, as “weird.”“Berri is not a centrist,” Fatfat said.
Lebanon plunged in a political crisis on October 19 when Internal Security
Forces Intelligence Branch chief Brigadier General Wissam al-Hasan was
assassinated. Jumblat delegated his ministers Ghazi al-Aridi, Alaeddine Terro,
and Wael Abou Faour to discuss an initiative based on finding an alternative to
Miqati's cabinet without causing any political vacuum in the country. He is
seeking to convince political foes to attend a new round of the national
dialogue sessions to discuss the arms of Hizbullah and other disputed matters.
Fatfat held a meeting on Wednesday with Jumblat in al-Mukhtara, he noted that he
discussed with the Druze leader his initiative to end the lingering political
crisis in the country.
“We will hold another meeting later on,” the lawmaker revealed. Fatfat
reiterated the opposition's stance from the national dialogue, saying “dialogue
will resume after the cabinet changes.”
“We are committed to the Baabda declaration, but we reject the formation of a
national unity cabinet,” he pointed out. The opposition rejects attending any
national dialogue session before Miqati's cabinet steps down and a new neutral
government is formed. “We want a neutral cabinet to supervise the upcoming 2013
parliamentary elections,” the MP added.
Hizbullah Calls on Independence Day Lebanese to
Commit to People, Army, Resistance Equation
Naharnet/Hizbullah noted on Wednesday that Lebanon's Independence Day is a very
important occasion for the Lebanese people due to the principles of loyalty and
sacrifice that it entails.It called in a statement the Lebanese people to unite
around the equation of the people, army, and resistance. “This equation made
possible southern Lebanon's liberation from Israeli occupation on May 25, 2000
and holy victory during the Israeli assault on the country in July 2006,” it
said.The party warned of the dangers “lurking around Lebanon and the region as a
result of enemy conspiracies that are targeting our people, land, wealth,
freedom, and sovereignty.”“These dangers require the people to unite under
national principles in order to protect the country against regional crises,”
stressed Hizbullah.
Two Rockets Fired from South at Israel, at Least One
Lands in Lebanon
Naharnet/Two rockets were fired from south
Lebanon towards the Israeli border on Wednesday evening, a Lebanese security
official told Agence France Press.
"Two rockets were fired, one fell in what was clearly Lebanese territory, the
other went towards Israel," the official said on condition of anonymity. It was
not immediately clear where the second rocket fell.
In Israel, an army spokeswoman said: "There are no rockets on Israeli
territory."
The Lebanese National News Agency reported that both rockets landed in Lebanon,
in Ebel al-Kameh and al-Hamames villages near al-Wazzani river, a hundred meters
away from the Israeli border.
Inhabitants of the region said they heard one rocket being fired from the Khiyam
plain, while the second's source remains unknown.
In the meantime, the army and the UNIFIL have deployed their units in the region
where these rockets landed. This comes after two rockets ready to be fired
against Israel were discovered in southern Lebanon on Monday. The Army Command
said the two 107mm Grad rockets were found between the towns of Halta and
al-Mari in the Hasbaya district.
SourceAgence France Presse
Lebanese Army Dismantles New Rocket Aimed at Israel
Naharnet /The Lebanese army said it dismantled on Thursday another rocket in
southern Lebanon after two similar rockets were fired towards Israel the day
before but fell short.
The army command said in a communique that following the attack on Wednesday,
the military and U.N. peacekeepers heavily patrolled the Marjayoun area where
the rockets were launched from and found a new rocket on its launcher. It said a
judicial investigation has been launched to find the perpetrators. The two
rockets were fired on Wednesday from Marjayoun toward Israel but fell short and
landed in southern Lebanon's al-Khiam valley, the army said. On Monday, Lebanese
officials also found and disarmed two rockets aimed at the Jewish state. The two
incidents coincided with a weeklong conflict between Israel and Hamas in the
Gaza Strip that came to a halt on Wednesday following the announcement of an
Egyptian-brokered cease-fire.
Forces leader Samir Geagea stands firm on boycott
November 22, 2012 /The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea vowed Wednesday that March 14
coalition would continue its boycott of Parliament until the “killing machine”
stops, as Speaker Nabih Berri was quoted as saying he wanted to see the
legislative branch get back to work. “I think, your excellence, it is time to
shout all together: ‘enough to political assassinations and we will not return
to carrying out routine work from now on until the killing machine has
stopped,’” Geagea, addressing Berri, said during a brief televised appearance.
“Isn’t it a crime to convene Parliament after 25 assassinations of political
[figures] and lawmakers, and isn’t it a crime that six MPs have fallen victim to
such attempts and only two survived?” Geagea asked.
Without naming Hezbollah, Geagea, a leading figure in the March 14 opposition
that has boycotted government’s work, argued it would be unethical to convene
parliamentary committees that included members of the resistance group. “Isn’t
it a crime for parliamentary committees to convene while its participants are
those affiliated with suspects directly accused of assassinations?” he asked.
Four members of Hezbollah were indicted by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon over
the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The group denies
any involvement in the case.
Meanwhile, Berri appeared adamant that parliamentary committees be convened and
the work of the legislative branch return to normal.
Earlier Wednesday, the speaker was quoted as saying he would call for the
convening of joint parliamentary committees, including the one studying a new
electoral draft law.
MPs who visited Berri quoted him as saying that “after the visit by Armenian
President Serzh Sargsyan to Lebanon, he will call for the joint parliamentary
committees to resume studying draft laws on the agenda.”During his meeting with
the parliamentarians, Berri reiterated that legislative work should be
reactivated in the face of the March 14 boycott of government work.
The opposition’s decision to boycott Parliament in a bid to pressure Prime
Minister Najib Mikati to resign came after the assassination of a top
intelligence chief last month.
Last week, Berri called for a parliamentary session for lawmakers to listen to
the Armenian president’s speech this month. The speaker was also reportedly
considering convening another session in solidarity with the Palestinian in
Gaza. His call for a Parliament session to welcome the Armenian president drew
harsh criticism from opposition lawmakers, who said the speaker was trying to
corner them into abandoning their boycott. Ali Hamdan, an adviser to Berri, told
The Daily Star that the joint committees studying a new draft electoral law was
among those that the speaker intends to convene.
The work of the committee studying the draft electoral law came to a halt when
March 14 parliamentarians said they received death threats and were afraid for
their lives.
A new law to govern the upcoming 2013 parliamentary polls is a demand by most of
the country’s leaders.
However, disputes over the type of system and the size of districts have delayed
approval of any of the proposals.
Iron Dome shootdowns of Gaza rockets cost
$25mln-$30mln: Israel
November 22, 2012/By Dan Williams/Daily Star
JERUSALEM: Israel's Iron Dome interceptions of Palestinian rockets during eight
days of Gaza fighting cost $25 million to $30 million, the government said on
Thursday, arguing the U.S.-backed system was well worth the money. "Were Iron
Dome traded on the (Tel Aviv) stock exchange or Nasdaq, it would have multiplied
its share value several times over," Civil Defence Minister Avi Dichter told
Israel Radio in an interview where he outlined the system's outlay. Using
radar-guided interceptor missiles, Israel's five truck-towed Iron Dome batteries
shot down 421 of some 1,500 rockets launched from the Gaza Strip between Nov. 14
and Wednesday's Egyptian-brokered truce, the military said. It put Iron Dome's
success rate at 90 percent. To lower costs, the system engages only rockets that
threaten populated areas, though it often fires two interceptor missiles at
once. Rockets killed 5 people in Israel and wounded dozens during the conflict,
police said. Three died in coastal Ashdod on a day when Rafael Advanced Defence
Systems Ltd, Iron Dome's state-owned manufacturer, said the system had suffered
a malfunction.
If more Hamas rockets had got through, especially the handful fired at the
commercial hub Tel Aviv, and caused mass casualties, devastating Israeli
retaliation perhaps including a full-scale ground assault would have been nearly
certain. A senior official estimated that such escalation could cost Israel as
much as $380 million a day. Keen to stem that risk, the United States has been
helping bankroll Iron Dome. President Barack Obama pledged further support on
Wednesday. Israel says it needs 13 batteries for satisfactory nationwide defence.
A defence industry source put the unit cost for Israel at around $50 million.
The focus of Israel's aerial assault on Gaza were the stockpiles and launch
silos of rockets imported or improvised by Hamas and other factions. Gaza
medical officials said 162 Palestinians were killed, more than half of them
civilians. The most potent of those rockets were Iranian-designed Fajr-5s with
75 km (46 mile) ranges and 175 kg (385 lb) warheads, though Hamas also said it
used a Gaza-made variant, "Qassam M-75".Iran denies supplying arms to the
Palestinians. But the Iranian Young Journalists Club website on Wednesday quoted
the commander of the Islamic republic's Revolutionary Guards, Mohammad Ali
Jafari, saying the corps had "put the technology of Fajr-5 missiles at their (Gazans')
disposal and right now a good number of these have been made and are available
to them".
Summarising the Gaza assault in a separate Israel Radio interview, Defence
Minister Ehud Barak said: "Hamas's heavy rockets were destroyed (and) a large
part of the mid-range rockets were destroyed."
Public holiday in Gaza to mark truce deal
November 22, 2012 /Daily Star
GAZA CITY, Palestinian Territories: Life in Gaza began returning to normal on
Thursday with a public holiday to mark a ceasefire that ended a violent
eight-day confrontation with the Israeli military.
After days and nights cooped up at home, their buildings rocked by an
unrelenting Israeli bombing campaign and the sound of outgoing Palestinian
rocket fire, residents were eager to reclaim their hometowns and their lives.For
the first time in more than a week, the noise of traffic jams and honking horns
filled the air in Gaza City, replacing the terrifying booms of air strikes and
rocket fire.
Traffic police returned to the streets to try to direct the chaos, to no great
effect, as people stopped by newspaper vendors to pick up a daily or ate
breakfast at one of the falafel stands dotting the city.
Shop owners began to reopen, some for the first time since the violence began on
November 14 with Israel's targeted killing of a senior Hamas military commander.
Some swept the pavement in front of their shops, as locals formed short queues
in front of cash machines, withdrawing money now that places were open for
business again.
Late on Wednesday, the ruling Hamas government announced that Thursday would be
a public holiday.
"The Palestinian government announces that Thursday 22nd November is a national
holiday of victory and an official holiday," it said in a statement.
It "invites all citizens to celebrate this occasion and visit the families of
the martyrs and the wounded and those affected by the violence and to affirm
national solidarity".
Government schools were expected to reopen on Saturday, ending a week without
studies for Gaza's children who have struggled to cope with the trauma of war
and the boredom of being stuck indoors.
Several Hamas ministers were expected to give addresses later in the day,
although there was no word as to whether Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniya
would be among them.
Gaza war illustrates will for triumph: Nasrallah
November 22, 2012/The Daily Star/EIRUT: Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah
said Wednesday that Gaza emerged victorious from Israel’s aggression, as both
sides officially announced an end to hostilities that left at least 162
Palestinians and five Israelis dead and scores of others wounded.
“News reports are saying that the news conferences will be held tonight to
announce a cease-fire, which clearly shows that the aggression will end and the
resistance will emerge victorious,” said Nasrallah in a speech. In a televised
speech on the seventh day of Ashoura in Beirut’s southern suburbs, Nasrallah
said the past week’s violence between Israel and Gaza would be a valuable
experience that all people in the region should learn from. “This experience can
provide lessons for Gaza, Lebanon, the Arab and Islamic region, America and the
Western states on the attitude of the enemy and the resistance,” he said.
“In the end, it is a valuable experience, and we need to benefit from it to
strengthen the will for triumph in this nation,” the Hezbollah leader added.
Nasrallah also voiced hope that Israel’s “monstrous aggression against Gaza”
would end Wednesday and that the Hamas leadership would succeed in imposing its
conditions on the international community through its sacrifices in this week’s
confrontation. Meanwhile, the March 14 coalition warned against dragging Lebanon
into another Middle Eastern conflict amid the increasing threat of rockets
launched from Lebanese territories toward Israel. The opposition March 14 also
praised Palestinians in Gaza in the runup to the cessation of hostilities.
“The March 14 coalition warns against any adventure that could open a new front
in south Lebanon, especially after two rockets aimed at Israel were discovered
in the south,” the group said in a statement.
Although Hezbollah said it would not intervene in the conflict between Hamas and
Israel, the party has vowed that it would ready for a confrontation if Israel
strikes Iran.
In 2006, Hezbollah fought a 33-day war with the Jewish state that was brought to
an end through United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701. The resolution,
which has largely been effective in keeping calm along the Blue Line, brought
thousands of international peacekeeping troops to ensure that only the Army
would carry weapons in the area.
Earlier this week, the Lebanese Army defused two Katyusha rockets aimed at
Israel in the southern region of Mazraat Halta, south Lebanon.
No militant group has claimed responsibility for deploying the Katyusha rockets
near the border. Military Prosecutor Judge Sakr Sakr has launched a probe into
the incident.
The coalition also reiterated its call for parties to adhere to Resolution 1701.
“U.N. Resolution 1701 secures international protection for Lebanon and it is
important to abide fully by it,” it said.
Following its weekly meeting, the coalition said it fully supported Palestinians
in Gaza, which has been under attack by Israel for almost a week.
“We are in full solidarity with the Palestinian people who are being targeted by
Israel and paying the price of its brutality,” said the statement.
The opposition also urged the U.N. Security Council and the Arab League to
protect Gaza and push for an international resolution that warns Israel against
launching a war against Palestinians.
March 14 has taken its eye off the ball
November 22, 2012/By Michael Young
The Daily Star
It has been just over a month since the assassination of Wissam al-Hasan. In
that time, the March 14 opposition has taken its eye off the political ball.
This may have serious repercussions at election time next year. There is an
opportunity to change tack, however, and Michel Sleiman and Walid Jumblatt’s
reconciliation efforts provide it.
For weeks, the opposition has sought the departure of Najib Mikati’s team and
its replacement by a neutral Cabinet, to no avail. A solid parliamentary
majority stands behind the government and, alas, no new government can be formed
against the wishes of Hezbollah. Moreover, none of the opposition’s friends
overseas will accept a void in Beirut. The position of March 14, as
understandable as it is in light of the Hasan killing, will lead nowhere, and
indeed is backfiring.
March 14 must remember that before the murder of Hasan it had achieved two
notable successes. It had built up a political axis with Sleiman, Jumblatt and
even Mikati, in defense of the state; and it had laid down the cornerstone of an
arrangement for winning parliamentary elections next year.
Hezbollah was not happy with this de facto March 14-Sleiman-Jumblatt-Mikati
collaboration. For the first time since 2005, March 14 could say that both the
president and prime minister shared its objectives, in a context far more stable
than Saad Hariri’s Cabinet of 2009-2011, which Hezbollah and Syria did
everything in their power to undermine. Under Mikati, Hezbollah was compelled to
accept the maneuvers of its government partners, even when these went against
the party’s preferences, for fear of seeing Mikati resign.
March 14 had a voice in the house, so to speak, and it was no surprise that both
Sleiman and Jumblatt were managing to push Hezbollah into a corner on its arms,
openly saying that the party had to integrate its arsenal into the Lebanese
Army. This was an important advance on the president’s part, and Mikati agreed
with it. To insist on the prime minister’s resignation in that context seems not
only counterproductive, it unnecessarily grants Hezbollah breathing space.
Then there are the elections, which will largely define who controls Lebanon
once the regime of Bashar Assad falls in Damascus. Hezbollah fairly early on
gauged the significance of these elections for its own future, realizing that
whoever controls Parliament as of next summer would have the means to bring in a
friendly government, and the next president in 2014. This legitimacy would
protect Hezbollah in a post-Assad Levant and allow it to pursue the “resistance”
option against the wishes of many of its compatriots.
Yet the seminal import of the elections has not sunk in on the March 14 side –
above all that the opposition will find it difficult to do as well as it did in
2009 without building a broad alliance with so-called centrist forces, including
Sleiman and Mikati. Hariri has reconciled with Jumblatt, a good thing, but the
real challenge for March 14 will be to win majorities in the predominantly
Christian districts of Mount Lebanon. In Baabda and Jbeil, Michel Aoun continues
to benefit from the support of rock-solid Shiite electoral blocs, as well as a
unified Armenian bloc in the Metn, providing him with decisive advantages,
regardless of whether his popularity has declined in relative terms.
For March 14 to gain on Aoun, it will need an electoral relationship with other
Christian political forces better able to challenge Aoun in Mount Lebanon, where
March 14’s popularity remains limited. Even in the Metn, the Kataeb is
uncomfortable with the opposition’s strategy, which could harm March 14’s
fortunes. An opening must be made to Sleiman and other independent Christians
who will confront Aoun. This cannot be done when March 14 is leaving the
president hanging out to dry on reconciliation, which bolsters his credibility.
As for Tripoli, the prevailing animosity toward Mikati could cost March 14 a
sweep in the city. The prime minister has his critics, but he also has money and
voters. If there is an electoral battle, which is not certain, the opposition
could lose one or two seats, a worrisome prospect in what is bound to be a tight
race.
Sunni unity is the foundation of March 14’s strength. Yet what we see today is a
community increasingly in disarray, buffeted by the Mikati-Hariri rivalry, and
more disturbingly by the emergence of radical figures such as Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir
in Sidon. By attacking the prime minister, March 14 only opens a wide avenue for
Assir to do the same, even as the sheikh contests the credibility of Hariri and
March 14. Better for March 14 to side with Mikati, albeit critically, and in
that way guarantee that a majority of Sunnis remains on the side of the state,
at a time when Assir’s warning that he may form an armed group has taken him in
a contentiously opposite direction.
March 14 will probably not reassess its position, but if it were to do so the
obvious means would be to embrace Sleiman and Jumblatt’s endeavors to resume the
National Dialogue. Yes, a dialogue is difficult with Hezbollah, but March 14
worked with the party after the 2009 elections, despite many assassinations and
Hezbollah’s takeover of western Beirut in 2008.
Bashar Assad will fall, which will weaken Hezbollah, but in the meantime Lebanon
has to be secured against Sunni-Shiite conflict. March 14 must also prepare for
the big test that is the election next year. With Sleiman and Jumblatt, the
opposition can bring victory for those wanting to reaffirm state authority
against Hezbollah’s project. Hasan’s death has derailed that scheme, and the
only beneficiaries are those with no interest in a cohesive state. March 14
cannot afford to lose sight of where its interests truly lie.
**Michael Young is opinion editor of THE DAILY STAR. He tweets @BeirutCalling.
FSA establishes new "regular" brigades, prepares for post-Assad period
By Yousef Diab/Beirut, Asharq Al-Awsat – There is conflicting information
regarding the military plans being drawn up by the Free Syrian Army [FSA] in
preparation for what has been called the “decisive” battle for Damascus. Syrian
opposition figures yesterday announced the “formation of a special military
brigade in Damascus and the surrounding area made up of FSA cadres in
preparation for the ‘decisive battle’ to liberate Damascus.” This brigade is the
first of its kind to be formed in the Rif Dimashq governorate, and is made up of
several opposition military units; it also includes a counter-intelligence unit
to detect any attempts by al-Assad loyalists to infiltrate the FSA.
Speaking exclusively to Asharq Al-Awsat, FSA Brigadier General Fayez al-Amro
revealed that “serious work is being undertaken to form regular military
brigades under a unified leadership which will manage the military operations on
the ground in an accurate and well-studied manner.”
He added “we are working hard to form three military brigades whose officers and
members will be chosen from the best [opposition] fighting forces, and we have
called on the opposing Syrian National Council [SNC] and Syrian National
Coalition to grant us the necessary support in this regard.”
Brigadier General Fayez al-Amro stressed that these new brigades will operate
across Syria, with one brigade operating in southern Syria, including Damascus
and the surrounding area, as well as Deraa. The second brigade will be based in
central Syria and its operations will include Homs, Hama and Aleppo, whilst the
third brigade will be based in the north. He said “these brigades will be the
only solution to return security and stability to all corners of the country
following the collapse of the Bashar al-Assad regime, because we cannot gamble
on civilian fighters for a long period of time because the civilians had no
choice but to take up arms to defend themselves and they will want to return to
their normal lives.”
The FSA Brigadier General also informed Asharq Al-Awsat that “the battle for
Damascus will be the final and decisive battle, but it will be planned very
carefully and we do not underestimate the regime forces strength in the capital.
It is true that the Syrian army has begun to lose self-confidence and morale,
but the regime still has a number of powerful cards in its hands that it could
surprise us with in Damascus, as this is its last stronghold.”
He added “these military bodies will be formed very soon, we know that the
regime enjoys international support, however as soon as the secret word is given
lifting this international cover [for the al-Assad regime], Bashar al-Assad will
be on the next plane fleeing Syria.”
The FSA commander also called on the new broad-based Syrian National Coalition
to “succeed in softening the international position, at least in terms of
supplying weapons capable of confronting the al-Assad regime air force to the
Syrian opposition fighters.”
For his part, FSA coordinator, Louay Miqdad, informed Asharq Al-Awsat that “the
battle for Damascus will be too great to be handled by the military brigades
alone, regardless of their numbers and capabilities.” He stressed that “we are
fighting in Damascus as brigades under the unified Supreme Military Council [of
the FSA], in the same manner that we are fighting in Dariyah, Harasta, Barzeh,
Ghouta and elsewhere.”
He also confirmed that “the FSA leadership has begun preparations…to open all
fronts at the same time in all [Syrian] cities, in preparation for the
liberation of Damascus.” Miqdad added “the battle for Damascus requires drawing
up plans involving all fronts, as well as cutting the regime’s supply routes and
communication with its forces. This primarily requires an end to the battle over
airports and cutting off the aerial bridge between Tehran and the al-Assad
regime…in addition to securing logistical support and supply routes in the
countryside as well as the acquisition of the necessary quantity of forces, arms
and ammunition to fight a battle over a long period of time.”
FSA coordinator Louay Miqdad also told Asharq Al-Awsat that “ongoing meetings
are being held between the FSA leadership and brigades operating on the ground
in Syria and in neighboring states…they are working to create a clear framework
to confront the regime.” He revealed that “it is no longer allowed, for example,
for Damascus to be bombarded and Aleppo to be silent, or for Aleppo to be
bombarded and Hama to rest.”
Miqdad stressed that “the confrontation requires for the five fronts to be
opened all at once in Syria, and we hope to finalize plans to begin the
implementation phase which we expect will have very good results” adding “our
sisterly countries have adopted this plan, and we hope that all countries follow
suit.”
He said “all of the countries that are concerned about the Syrian crisis must
arm the FSA with heavy arms, and we pledge that such arms will only be given to
officers with high levels of experience, and that such arms will not reach
extremist groups” adding “we are prepared to return these weapons following the
liberation of Syria.”
Canada Welcomes Ceasefire Agreement
November 21, 2012 - Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird today issued the
following statement:
“Canada welcomes this ceasefire and hopes that terrorist cells based in Gaza
will abide by the terms of this agreement.
“We are deeply concerned about the loss of innocent lives on both sides and hope
this agreement will end the fear, violence and death of the past days.
“In my conversations with regional ambassadors and counterparts, I have
reiterated Canada’s support for Israel’s right to defend itself against
terrorism, which, in all its forms, must be wholly rejected by all peace-loving
people around the world.
“Canada appreciates the concerted efforts taken by the Egyptian government, with
the support of others, to mediate the ceasefire agreement.”
Case Against 'Innocence of Muslims' Filmmaker Raises Eyebrows
by Adam Turner/The Blaze
November 19, 2012
http://www.meforum.org/3385/nakoula-basseley-case
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, (or Mark Basseley Youssef) the American Coptic
filmmaker partly responsible for the film clip that President Barack Obama,
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice initially and
incorrectly blamed for inciting the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in
Benghazi that killed the American Ambassador and three other Americans, was
recently sentenced to a one year prison term for violating his probation.
On September 27, in the midst of the tumult in the Muslim world, Nakoula was
arrested in the middle of the night from his home in the Los Angeles area for
violating his probation for a 2010 bank-fraud conviction. The media was
conveniently present to record his "perp walk" to the Sheriff's office, which
was broadcast worldwide. Nakoula spent slightly over a month in solitary
confinement, being held without bond at the Los Angeles Metropolitan Detention
Center. On November 7, the day after the U.S. elections, his trial was finally
held. He admitted to lying to his probation officer and three allegations of
using false identities in exchange for his prosecutors dropping four allegations
of using false identities. Nakoula was sentenced to one year in prison, instead
of the two years recommended by his probation officers. The judge specifically
rejected the idea of home confinement.
Now, Mr. Nakoula is certainly no prize as a human being. He has an extensive,
but non-violent, criminal background. In 1997, he pled guilty to intent to
manufacture methamphetamine and was sentenced to one year in county jail and
three years of probation (but not parole). In 2002, Mr. Nakoula violated his
drug probation and was re-sentenced to another year in jail. In 2010, he pled
guilty to a bank fraud crime, and was sentenced to twenty-one months in prison
to be followed by another five years of probation. Nakoula was guilty to check
kiting, as he had opened bank accounts using fake names and stolen Social
Security numbers and deposited checks from those accounts to later withdraw
money from.
In mid-September, after Nakoula was revealed as someone involved in the film,
his probation officials in the Central District of California charged him with
eight counts of violations, and recommended a twenty four month term to
Magistrate Judge Suzanne Segal. Judge Segal ruled that since Nakoula had failed
to prove he wasn't a flight risk, he would have to stay in prison till his
probation revocation hearing, justifying this decision because Nakoula "engaged
in a likely pattern of deception both to his probation officers and the court"
and "(t)he court has a lack of trust in this defendant at this time."
But, with all that admitted, the questions remain: Would Nakoula be back in
prison had he not offended the sensibilities of Islamists worldwide and of an
Administration that seems to cater to their continuing criticism of free speech
that is critical of Islam? Is Nakoula's disposition the kind of
politically-tilted treatment the Framers would have thought should be given
bedrock free speech rights? There seems to be strong evidence that his (albeit)
legitimate case was processed to appease Islamists and others who opposed his
speech on Islam. Certainly, his probation revocation process after arrest and
the Judge's ruling were somewhat nontraditional. In most federal cases, the
probation officer submits a confidential report to the sentencing judge, "who
then can pursue a probation revocation hearing – a mini-trial of sorts – where
probation officials must prove the violation. If the judge finds the individual
in violation, the court can return the defendant to probation, send him to
prison or impose additional terms of probation without prison time. Normal cases
can move very quickly – sometimes taking days – once a probation officer has
prepared a report…" In this instance, however, the political and diplomatic
ramifications resulted in a long delay. Also, the decision by the federal
officials to publicize the original arrest of Nakoula and stage a very guilty
looking perp walk seems somewhat peculiar. The prosecutors, who should have
avoided bringing up the film and the violence in the Muslim world in court for
First Amendment reasons, nonetheless did so.
In addition, as noted by journalist Kerry Picket, abnormal staffing decisions
were made by the prosecution. The prosecutor was Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert
Rugdale, who is second in command of the U.S. Attorney's (USA) Office below U.S.
Attorney Andre Birotte. Birotte, of course, is appointed by the President. Ms.
Picket found this "curious" since Assistant U.S. Atty. Jennifer Williams, who
helped prosecute Mr. Nakoula's bank fraud conviction, would normally have been
chosen to deal with this case. And it is even more unusual for Mr. Nakoula's
probation violation case, for no explained reason – the USA office refused to
comment on this staffing matter – to be kicked up to the number two prosecutor
in the office.
A number of prominent legal minds have remarked on the suspicious nature of Mr.
Nakoula's probation violation case. Mark Werksman, a defense attorney in Los
Angeles and a former federal prosecutor spectacularly claimed that "(t)his case
breaks the mold. If the video hadn't gone viral, and caused the Arabic world to
blow up, who would care if this guy is using YouTube? It's all about politics
with this guy." Law Professor Lawrence Rosenthal was quoted as acknowledging
that it is "highly unusual" for a judge to order immediate detention on a
probation violation for a nonviolent crime, but then he qualified his statement,
continuing that if there were questions about Nakoula's identity it was more
likely (but not necessarily "usual").
Jonathan Turley, a law professor who specializes in First Amendment
jurisprudence, has said that "(v)iolations of probation conditions are quite
common and rarely result in re-incarceration. Probation terms tend to be
sweeping and most such violations result in warnings or brief appearances before
the court." Turley has also written: "(f)rom my experience as a criminal defense
attorney, the violations described in a case of his kind rarely warrant the
24-month term demanded for Nakoula Basseley Nakoula. In addition, the federal
authorities insisted on his being jailed as a flight risk, though it is unclear
why that is the case and why he could not be given an electronic bracelet."
Former federal prosecutor Bill Otis has confirmed that, based on his decades of
service, "probation violators routinely get a pass on violations far more
serious and suggestive of renewed criminality than making a perfectly legal
(and, some would think, First Amendment-protected) video."
And then, there is what may be the "smoking gun" in this case. Charles Woods,
the father of one of the four Americans killed in Benghazi, has alleged that
Secretary of State Clinton approached him at the Benghazi victim's memorial to
promise to bring to justice, not the Islamist terrorists who killed his son, but
Mr. Nakoula. As Pseudonymous blogger Allahpundit of Hot Air says, if true:
That's perverse, but in keeping with the fact that she (Clinton) decided to run
ads on Pakistani TV apologizing for the film while Islamist cretins menaced
American diplomats across the region. Even if you give her the benefit of the
doubt and assume that she had no intention of prosecuting the filmmaker but was
merely telling Woods something she thought would console him, why on earth would
she zero in on the filmmaker as the target of blame instead of the degenerates
who actually shot his son?
The answer to this question may be that the Obama Administration is less than
fond of free speech that "slanders" Islam. In his now infamous Cairo speech in
2009 Obama told an Egyptian Muslim audience, including the Muslim Brotherhood,
on foreign soil that he considers "it part of my responsibility as President of
the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they
appear." In the aftermath of the Muslim world's protests to the video, Obama
told the UN General Assembly that "(t)he future must not belong to those who
slander the prophet of Islam." Nakoula was arrested the following day.
During the past year, of the 10,823 adults under supervision in the federal
probation system, only 829 had their probation revoked for technical reasons.
Usually the violations that attract the attention of the courts are those that
involve violence, drugs, or other serious unwholesome behavior. Nakoula Basseley
Nakoula has been sentenced to a year in prison for probation violations that are
none of these. His case stinks to high heaven, with its slow process, the
prosecution's demand for serious prison time, the very public arrest, the
decision by the U.S. Attorney's office to have a senior prosecutor handle the
case, and the judge's decision to imprison immediately without any bail. Then,
there is the statement by the Secretary of State, whose position, unless I am
misremembering my American government classes, does not have jurisdiction over
domestic criminal matters. And let's not forget that the government's very
public identification and prosecution of Nakoula – done for his speech, and not
for his probation violations – has actually endangered his life, and that of his
family's, even forcing them to flee their own home.
I would love to believe that this case, and this criminal sentence, is totally
focused on Mr. Nakoula's actual probation violations, and has nothing to do with
the film he wrote about Muhammed. I would love to believe this, but the
surrounding circumstances are just too suspicious.
Adam Turner serves as staff counsel to the Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET)
and the Legal Project at the Middle East Forum. He is a former counsel to the
Senate Judiciary Committee where he focused on national security law.