LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
May 29/12
Bible Quotation for today/
Teaching about
Charity
Matthew 06/01-04:"Make
certain you do not perform your religious duties in public so that people will
see what you do. If you do these things publicly, you will not have any reward
from your Father in heaven. So
when you give something to a needy person, do not make a big show of it, as the
hypocrites do in the houses of worship and on the streets. They do it so that
people will praise them. I assure you, they have already been paid in full. But
when you help a needy person, do it in such a way that even your closest friend
will not know about it. Then it will be a private matter. And your Father, who
sees what you do in private, will reward you.
Ingratitude, Prostitution and
Stupidity
Elias Bejjani: Woe to a nation its protectors are murderers and criminals, Its
Clergymen men hypocrites and Vampires, its politicians mercenaries and Trojans,
and its citizens subservient like sheep driven to stables and slaughtering
houses while mute and laughing.
Latest analysis, editorials, studies,
reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Will
al-Assad depart in the Yemeni manner/By
Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/May
28/12
Syria’s intellectuals between fear and
integration/By:
Rima Fuleihan/Now Lebanon/May 28/12
Iran to launch new nuclear plant
project: state TV
By Mohammad Davari | AFP
Iran is to build a new nuclear power plant, alongside its sole existing one in
the southern city of Bushehr, by early 2014, state television reported on
Sunday, quoting the head of the country's Atomic Energy Organisation. "Iran will
build a 1,000-megawatt nuclear power plant in Bushehr next year," the television
quoted Fereydoon Abbasi Davani as saying. He was referring to the Iranian
calendar year running from March 2013 to March 2014. The Mehr news agency
suggested the timeline could be longer, quoting Abbasi Davani as saying: "We
will begin plans for a 1,000-megawatt plant in Bushehr next year." He said
foreign contractors would be needed for its construction. The Mehr and ISNA news
agencies both reported another nuclear plant was also planned and could be built
in coming years.
ISNA quoted Abbasi Davani as saying that designs for a 360-megawatt facility in
Darkhovin, in the southwestern province of Khuzestan near the border with Iraq,
"have been finished and we are reviewing it."
He did not elaborate. Darkhovin, a project initiated by France but abandoned
after Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, has been stalled because of European
sanctions against Tehran.
In September 2011, deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Ahmadian said Iran was seeking
foreign help to finish the project. The current Bushehr nuclear plant was
started by German engineers in the 1970s and was completed by Russia, which
continues to help keeping it running and provides fuel for it. Inaugurated in
2010, it is due to come fully on-line in November this year.
In addition, Iran has a research reactor operating in Tehran that is used to
make medical isotopes for patients with cancer and other illnesses.
A new Bushehr plant would boost electricity production in Iran, which has some
of the world's biggest reserves. State television made its announcement in the
wake of talks in Baghdad on Wednesday and Thursday between Iran and world powers
that focused on Tehran's controversial nuclear programme. Those talks almost
collapsed because of the very different positions held by the two sides, but
agreement was finally reached to hold another round in Moscow on June 18-19.
Iran insists its nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful and aimed at
producing energy and medical isotopes.
The world powers -- the Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United
States -- suspect the programme could include work towards developing a nuclear
weapons capability, and they have backed UN Security Council resolutions
demanding Iran curb its activities
Syrian government denies attack that killed more than 100, UN council condemns
shelling
By Ben Hubbard,Edith M. Lederer, The Associated Press | The Canadian Press
BEIRUT - Syria on Sunday strongly denied allegations that its forces killed
scores of people — including women and children — in one of the deadliest days
of the country's uprising, but the U.N. Security Council after an emergency
session condemned government forces for shelling residential areas.
The killing of more than 100 people in the west-central area of Houla on Friday
brought widespread international criticism of the regime of President Bashar
Assad, although differences emerged from world powers over whether his forces
were exclusively to blame.
The Security Council issued a press statement Sunday that "condemned in the
strongest possible terms" the killings in Houla. It blamed Syrian forces for
artillery and tank shelling of residential areas. It also condemned the killings
of civilians "by shooting at close range and by severe physical abuse," but
avoided saying who was responsible for these attacks.
The council's statement said the "outrageous use of force" against civilians
violated international law and Syrian government commitments under previous U.N.
resolutions to stop all violence, including the use of heavy weapons in
populated areas. It said "those responsible for acts of violence must be held
accountable," and asked the U.N. observer mission in Syria and Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon to investigate the attacks and report back to the council.
Britain and France had proposed issuing a press statement condemning the attack
on civilians and pointing the finger at the Syrian government for Friday's
massacre. But Russia called for an emergency council meeting saying it first
wanted a briefing by Gen. Robert Mood, the head of the unarmed U.N. observer
mission.
The massacre in Houla on Friday cast fresh doubts on the ability of an
international peace plan put forward by U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan to end
Syria's 14-month-old crisis.
The brutality of the killings became clear in amateur videos posted online that
showed scores of bodies, many of them young children, in neat rows and covered
with blood and deep wounds. A later video showed the bodies, wrapped in white
sheets, being placed in a sprawling mass grave.
Mood told the Security Council that U.N. observers at the scene now estimate 108
people were killed in Houla, U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous told
reporters outside the council chamber. The U.N. counted 49 children and 34 women
among the dead.
Activists from the Houla area said the army pounded the villages with artillery
and clashed with local rebels after protests Friday. Some activists said
pro-regime thugs later stormed the area, doing the bulk of the killing by
gunning down men in the streets and stabbing women and children in their homes.
The Syrian government rejected that narrative Sunday, painting a vastly
different picture.
Speaking to reporters in Damascus, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi
said Syrian security forces were in their local bases Friday when they were
attacked by "hundreds of heavily armed gunmen" firing mortars, heavy
machine-guns and anti-tank missiles, staring a nine-hour battle that killed
three soldiers and wounded 16.
The soldiers fought back, but didn't leave their bases, he said.
"No Syrian tank or artillery entered this place where the massacres were
committed," he said. "The security forces did not leave their places because
they were in a state of self-defence."
He blamed the gunmen for what he called a "terrorist massacre" in Houla and
accused the media, Western officials and others of spinning a "tsunami of lies"
to justify foreign intervention in Syria.
Makdissi did not provide videos or other evidence to support his version of
events, nor did he give a death toll. He said the government had formed a
committee to investigate and share its findings with Annan, who is due to visit
Damascus in the coming days.
Throughout the uprising, the government has deployed snipers, troops and thugs
to quash protests and shelled opposition areas.
A video released by the U.N. team in Syria on Sunday showed observers in Houla
the day after the attack, meeting with local rebels and watching residents
collect more bodies for burial. It also showed two destroyed armoured personnel
carriers — suggesting that local rebels put up more of a fight than the
activists acknowledged.
In a letter to the Security Council, Ban said villages in the Houla area have
been outside government control but surrounded by a heavy Syrian military
presence.
When U.N. observers visited the area on Saturday, Ban said they saw 85 corpses
in a mosque in Taldou and "observed shotgun wounds and wounds consistent with
artillery fire." He said "the patrol also saw artillery and tank shells, as well
as fresh tank tracks" and observed that "many buildings had been destroyed by
heavy weapons."
At U.N. headquarters, Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador Alexander Pankin told
reporters as he headed into the closed-door Security Council meeting that "there
is substantial ground to believe that the majority of those who were killed were
either slashed, cut by knives, or executed at point-blank distance."
"We have to establish whether it was Syrian authorities ... before we agree on
something," he said.
A press statement is weaker than a presidential statement, which becomes part of
the council record, or a legally binding U.N. resolution, but it must be
approved by all 15 members and therefore reflects strong Security Council
backing.
Annan's peace plan for Syria, sponsored by the U.N. and the Arab League, is one
of the few points of agreement among world powers about Syria's crisis, which
began in March 2011 with protests calling for political change. As the
government violently cracked down on the uprising, many in the opposition took
up arms to defend themselves and attack government troops.
The U.N. put the death toll weeks ago at more than 9,000. Hundreds more have
been killed since then.
Daily violence has marred the plan since a cease-fire was supposed to begin
April 12. The Houla attack made Friday the deadliest day since the truce was
announced, and has cast a shadow over Annan's visit. In another defiant move,
Syria on Sunday denied permission for Annan's deputy to travel to Damascus with
his boss, a senior Arab League official said. The rejection of former
Palestinian Foreign Minister Nasser al-Kidwa was intended as a slap to the Arab
League, which suspended Syria's membership and approved sanctions against it
last year.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the
issue. Annan's spokesman declined to comment.
The Houla attacks caused outrage among American and international officials that
Makdissi's comments Sunday failed to assuage.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague said he would summon Syria's most senior
diplomat in the U.K. on Monday so the Foreign Office could "make clear our
condemnation of the Syrian regime's actions." Kuwait, which currently heads the
22-member Arab League, called for an Arab ministerial meeting to "take steps to
put an end to the oppressive practices against the Syrian people."
Switzerland's Foreign Ministry urged that an international inquiry be convened,
saying the killings "could constitute a war crime."
In Paris, the head of the exile Syrian National Council also condemned the
killings.
"The kids of Houla are the kids of all of Syria," Burhan Ghalioun told
reporters. "Killing the kids of Houla is like killing the kids of all of Syria."
Anti-regime activists scoffed at the government's version of events. One Houla
activist said via Skype that the area had at most 300 fighters, but that none
had more than rifles and that they often lacked ammunition. "If we had anti-tank
missiles, there would be no tanks left in the area," said Mohammed, declining to
give his full name for fear of retribution.
Activists reported shelling, gunfire and arrest raids in opposition areas
throughout the country Sunday as well as clashes between regime forces and
rebels in a number of areas. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human
Rights said security forces killed at least 14 civilians, while rebels killed
nine soldiers.
Activist claims could not be independently verified. The Syrian government bars
most media from operating in the country.
Annan's plan calls for eventual talks between all sides on a political solution
to the crisis.
The U.S. hopes Russia can use its influence with Damascus to press for a
political transition similar to that seen in Yemen. In February, longtime Yemeni
President Ali Abdullah Saleh passed power to his deputy in exchange for immunity
from prosecution.
U.S. officials say Russia does not oppose a political transition in Syria in
theory, but has not agreed to specific terms.
**Lederer reported from the United Nations. Associated Press writers Adam
Schreck in Dubai and Hamza Hendawi in Cairo contributed to this report.
Security Council blames Syria
for shelling Houla
Play CBS News Video
(AP) UNITED NATIONS - The U.N. Security Council has blamed Syrian government
forces for artillery and tank shelling of residential areas in the town of Houla
and it is strongly condemning the killing of dozens of civilians. The council
said in a press statement issued after an emergency meeting Sunday afternoon
that it also "condemned the killing of civilians by shooting at close range and
by severe physical abuse" in Houla. It did not say who was responsible for the
close-range attacks. The U.N. says at least 108 people, including 49 children
and 34 women, died in Friday's attacks in Houla.
The council statement says the "outrageous use of force" against civilians
violated international law and Syrian government commitments under Security
Council resolutions to cease violence, including the use of heavy weapons in
populated areas. Before the emergency meeting, Britain and France had proposed
issuing a press statement condemning the attack on civilians and pointing the
finger at the Syrian government for Friday's massacre. But Russia told council
members it could not agree and wanted a briefing first by Gen. Robert Mood, the
head of the unarmed U.N. observer mission. Russia called for the emergency
meeting to hear Mood's report and consider a possible Security Council press
statement. Mood told the council that U.N. observers after revisiting the scene
raised the death toll in Houla to 108 people, U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve
Ladsous told reporters outside the council chamber. Mood said Saturday that
observers confirmed from an examination of ordnance found at the scene that
artillery and tank shells were fired. Russia, which considers Syria its closest
Mideast ally, has used its Security Council veto power to block resolutions
raising the possibility of U.N. action against President Bashar Assad. The
assault on Houla was one of the bloodiest single events in Syria's 15-month
uprising against Assad's regime.
A statement issued Saturday by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and his
predecessor Annan, the joint U.N.-Arab League envoy to Syria condemned the
"indiscriminate and disproportionate use of force" in violation of international
law and Syrian commitments to stop using heavy weapons in populated areas. They
demanded that the Syrian government stop using such weapons.
The Syrian government on Sunday denied responsibility for the Houla massacre,
blaming the killings on "hundreds of heavily armed gunmen" who also attacked
soldiers in the area.
Russia's Pankin said "the number of those wounded does not correspond to what
you would expect in terms of destruction — You cannot have one or two houses
destructed (cq) and 500 wounded with shrapnel." "We have to establish whether it
was Syrian authorities ... before we agree on something," he said. Activists
from Houla said Saturday that regime forces had peppered the area with mortar
shells after large demonstrations against the regime on Friday. That evening,
they said, pro-regime fighters known as shabiha stormed the villages, gunning
down men in the streets and stabbing women and children in their homes.
Britain's U.N. Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant told reporters that from the
information his government has gathered "it seems quite clear that the massacre
in Houla was caused by a heavy bombardment and by government artillery and
indeed tanks." "And I would expect the briefing we'll receive from Gen. Mood
today will confirm that. And if that's the case, we condemn it utterly," he
said.
Both Pankin and Grant said the attack represents a violation of international
law regardless of who is responsible. The Houla attacks have sparked outrage
from American and other international leaders, and renewed concerns about the
relevance of a 6-week-old international peace plan negotiated by Annan that has
not stopped almost daily violence despite the presence of more than 250 U.N.
observers. The U.N. put the death toll weeks ago at more than 9,000. Hundreds
have been killed since.
No easy solutions in Syria
Benjamin Herscovitch /Drum Opinion
There are no easy options in the Syria situation.
There are reports that the Assad regime continues to fire on the Syrian people,
while the international face of the opposition movement, the Syrian National
Council (SNC), is riven with infighting.
At the same time, there are worrying signs of Islamist militants entering the
fray. This jockeying for control between the Assad regime, opposition activists
and Islamist militants, to name just three major players, means that predicting
the outcome of any particular policy response is perilously difficult. If the
complexity of conditions on the ground was not enough, the moral stakes in Syria
are dauntingly high. If the international community does not arm the rebels or
intervene militarily, the violence will likely continue and the Assad regime
will have the upper hand.
However, military support for the Free Syrian Army (FSA) or intervention also
comes with significant risks. There is the danger that removing Assad will
principate internecine warfare and provide militant Islamist groups with an
avenue to wield disproportionate influence. Given these complexities, Michael
Brull's broad brush-stroke moralising about humanitarian interventions does not
befit what should be a sober debate about the appropriate response to the
ongoing violence in Syria. In the article of mine to which Mr Brull was
responding, I argued that the international community should "reconsider its
decisions to neither intervene militarily nor arm the FSA". I was not defending
what Mr Brull erroneously calls 'brazen militarism' but simply suggesting that
the gravity of the situation demands that the international community at least
consider a more forceful response. Beyond misrepresenting my own views, Mr Brull
also ignores recent developments in Syria. The SNC, which Mr Brull says opposes
international intervention, is increasingly losing support in Syria. Tribal and
minority figures have little confidence in the SNC, and it has been accused of
being aloof and unrepresentative. Perhaps most importantly, Mr Brull sidesteps
the true nature of the international community's choice. In the absence of
military support for the FSA or military intervention, the violence is unlikely
to cease. The Assad regime's attacks on the Syrian people and reprisals by
comparatively poorly armed opposition groups will continue. The international
community's choice is therefore not between peaceful non-intervention and
violent military action. As Steven Heydemann and Reinoud Leenders observe: "The
question we face at this point ... is not a false choice between non-violence
and militarisation."The choice is between a continuation of what is approaching
chaotic civil war and a concerted, albeit difficult and costly, international
push to support an indigenous opposition.The Syrian people are demanding regime
change. They have been willing to die for it for over 14 months. It behoves the
international community to explore options beyond mere diplomacy to help them
achieve the freedom for which they have already sacrificed so much.As difficult
and dangerous as military support for the FSA or military intervention might be,
Mr Brull would do well to remember that there are no easy options in Syria.
Herscovitch and Brull studied philosophy together at University of New South
Wales and are friends.
Benjamin Herscovitch is a policy analyst at the Centre for Independent Studies.
Syria massacre: UK 'no
right' to ban athletes
A Syrian official has said the UK "has no right" to deny their athletes access
to the London 2012 Olympic games.Mowaffak Joma, chairman of the Syrian Olympic
committee, said the Olympic charter forbids host countries from banning
athletes. Deputy PM Nick Clegg has said Syrian delegation members with
connections to the regime will be denied entry.His comments came after Syria
denied any involvement in the massacre of 108 civilians in Houla. The United
Nations (UN) say 32 of those killed, allegedly during and after clashes between
Syrian security forces and "armed terrorists", were children under 10 years old.
'All support Assad' Mr Joma told the BBC that "the authority of any host country
is limited to organising and offering all necessary facilities to all
participating athletes.
"If the British government has decided to ban anyone connected to the regime and
to President Bashar-al Assad, I am telling you in advance they should ban all
Syrian citizens, because we all support President Assad and support Syria."
Syria's Olympic chief says the whole delegation supports the Assad regime The
Syrian official added that it had been agreed with the International Olympics
Committee (IOC) two weeks ago during a meeting in Russia that Syrian athletes
would compete under the country's official flag of state, and not of the
opposition and its army.
Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme, Mr Clegg said that, in reference to
the Syrian Olympic delegation, "as a government we have recently changed the
rules about who we allow into this country and who we refuse entry to. "If there
is evidence that you have abused human rights and that is independently shown to
be the case, you will not be able to come into this country.
"What I cannot do... sitting here is [provide] a list of the individuals to
come, and are they coming as per the arrangements with the IOC." Speaking ahead
of a flight to Moscow for talks with the Russian foreign minister, Foreign
Secretary William Hague said that all applications to come to the UK - whether
during the Olympics or not - will be looked at "rigorously and vigorously".
He added: "We have already made it clear that if people try to come in where
there is information linking them to serious human rights abuses, then we have
the power to prevent them coming into the country. "We do have the power to
prevent them entering the UK, even when the Olympics is on."
Syria’s intellectuals between
fear and integration
Rima Fuleihan, May 28, 2012 /Now Lebanon
An opposition demonstration in Syria. Too many Syrian intellectuals have not
joined the protest movement against the regime. (AFP photo)
Tensions have been smoldering for more than 40 years within Syrian society,
spanning over the rules of both Hafez and Bashar al-Assad. Creativity was bound
and all kinds of human rights violations were committed in the country, and this
goes without mentioning poverty, corruption and monopoly of power.
As the Arab Spring broke out, intellectuals—including writers, artists and media
professionals—witnessed indescribable controversies, debates and enthusiasm.
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak resigned, and intellectuals celebrated freedom
and shouted their support to Egypt. We exchanged congratulations over the phone
and Facebook, and I personally did not sleep that night.
However, many of those who shouted their support for Egypt and stayed awake
until morning to celebrate victory failed to take to the streets at the start of
the Syrian uprising. Many figures who were close to the opposition prior to the
revolt questioned its objectives. Second- and third-tier figures moved to the
forefront.
The uprising in Syria was initiated by educated Syrian young men and women. They
started the first protests in Damascus and were the first to be pursued and
arrested. Intellectuals are still an important part of the rebellion in Syria
and are not getting the media support they deserve, even though they are
characterized by awareness, foresight and diversity. This lack of exposure is
linked to the agendas of some media outlets. This prevents many classes of the
population from joining the uprising, and it delays the fall of the regime.
But the largest swath of intellectuals and artists remained silent. They had
several concerns—including the regime’s repression, fear of arrest, murder and
displacement. They also shared concerns with minorities, which the regime has
been masterfully playing ever since it took power, and feared an Islamist
takeover, since protests are starting from mosques. (Some young lay
intellectuals, however, started out from mosques with the others, because
mosques are the only places where people can gather under the emergency law.)
The regime did its part to stoke intellectuals’ fears. It claimed that the
uprising was led by extremist Salafists and armed gangs. It said the rebellion
aimed to undermine the Resistance. It said al Qaeda was involved to manipulate
the international community’s fears.
In spite of all that, certain names from all over the Syrian religious,
sectarian, political and intellectual spectrum still shone, breaking the walls
of lies erected by the regime. Despite being arrested, tortured and deported,
certain intellectuals called for a country that respects its citizens’ dignity,
justice and freedom. Some were beaten, such as political cartoonist Ali Farzat;
some were arrested, displaced or chased out, such as Palestinian leftist
intellectual Salama Kayla; others were accused of treason and exposed to smear
campaigns in the media; and many were fired from their jobs and blacklisted from
employment.
Many intellectuals issued declarations such as the Milk Statement, calling for
ending the siege on Daraa’s children, and took part in protests, coordination
meetings and media events. The landmark event of the intellectuals’ movement was
a protest held in July 2011. This demonstration, which started in front of the
Al-Hassan Mosque, ended with everyone being arrested. As well as myself, artist
May Skaff, writer Yem Mashadi, director Nidal Al-Hassan, media figure Iyad
Shraygi were arrested and held in detention for four days. The Friday following
our arrest was dubbed the “Friday of Freedom Prisoners.”
In conclusion, despite the regime’s attempt to distort the revolution and its
routine recourse to criminal behavior, most Arab intellectuals failed to support
the Syrian revolution, though never failed in the past to talk about freedoms
and human rights, which are concepts the Syrian uprising is all about.
Will al-Assad depart in the
Yemeni manner?
By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat
The New York Times has revealed that US – Russian talks are taking place to
implement the Yemeni solution in Syria, and this is in the hopes of securing
Bashar al-Assad’s withdrawal from power along the lines of Yemen’s Saleh. The US
newspaper says that nothing is confirmed, but that the Russian response is
giving somewhat positive signals.
The question that must be asked here is: can the Yemeni model succeed in Syria?
The answer is that this would be difficult, for a number of reasons,
particularly as what has happened today in Syria exceeds anything that happened
in Yemen, indeed there is no comparison whatsoever, for in Syria the civilian
death toll at the hands of the al-Assad regime exceeds 12,000, not counting the
number of missing, so who will be held responsible for all this bloodshed? In
fact, merely the revelation of negotiations between the Russians and al-Assad
over an exit plan would not only strain the uprising Syrian street, but it would
blow the minds of the circles close to al-Assad. We are not talking about his
inner circle here, but rather the security apparatus – with all its leadership
and officers – for they are the ones who are primarily embroiled in the
killings, not to mention the pro-regime Shabiha militia, as well as some
businessmen: so what will be there fate after al-Assad?
In the Syrian case, we do not talk about the president’s sons or nephews – as we
did in Yemen – but rather a significant number of military leaders, on all
levels, in total numbering between 100,000 and 150,000, at the lowest estimates;
they are the ones who are embroiled in shedding the blood of the Syrian people,
whilst the majority of them belong to a single sect, so how will they respond to
al-Assad leaving power with immunity which will likely not cover them all? Will
they accept al-Assad’s safe departure whilst they face an uncertain future? From
here, the mere revelation of serious negotiations between Russia and al-Assad
over securing his departure may increase the chances of a military coup, as
al-Assad’s protectors would undoubtedly prefer for the revolution to snack on
him, rather than them. Therefore, as we have repeatedly stated, delaying
resolving the Syrian crisis will only increase the eventual cost of this
solution. Al-Assad’s agents who have shed the blood of the Syrian people are too
great in number to be granted immunity, therefore it is difficult to expect the
Yemeni solution to work in Syria today, even if al-Assad’s departure – in itself
– would represent something positive.
Accordingly, this complexity is not just related to the circles close to
al-Assad, but we must also take into account the Iranian position, as well as
Hezbollah. In the event that the US – Russian project is serious, then Iran –
along with Hezbollah – will rush to support a quick coup in Syria; Tehran is
keen to have a role in any change in Syria, and this is in order to protect its
own interests, as well as the interests of Hezbollah. Iran could do this,
particularly if it is certain that the likelihood of al-Assad’s departure is
greater than at any time before. One might ask: isn’t it possible that Russia
will try to help itself by organizing a coup of this kind, along with the
Iranians and senior Alawite officers? The answer is: anything is possible,
particularly when all al-Assad’s own allies are now aware that he is the source
of a major dilemma for them today.
Therefore it is important that these initiatives do not grant al-Assad more
time, and any such initiative must be thought out carefully, along with the
continuation of the serious work to bring down the al-Assad regime and save
Syria and the Syrian people, not to mention the region as a whole.