LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
May 29/12

Bible Quotation for today/ Teaching about Charity
Matthew 06/01-04:"Make certain you do not perform your religious duties in public so that people will see what you do. If you do these things publicly, you will not have any reward from your Father in heaven.  So when you give something to a needy person, do not make a big show of it, as the hypocrites do in the houses of worship and on the streets. They do it so that people will praise them. I assure you, they have already been paid in full. But when you help a needy person, do it in such a way that even your closest friend will not know about it. Then it will be a private matter. And your Father, who sees what you do in private, will reward you.

Ingratitude, Prostitution and Stupidity
Elias Bejjani: Woe to a nation its protectors are murderers and criminals, Its Clergymen men hypocrites and Vampires, its politicians mercenaries and Trojans, and its citizens subservient like sheep driven to stables and slaughtering houses while mute and laughing.
 

Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Will al-Assad depart in the Yemeni manner/
By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 28/12
Syria’s intellectuals between fear and integration/By: Rima Fuleihan/Now Lebanon/May 28/12

Iran to launch new nuclear plant project: state TV
By Mohammad Davari | AFP
Iran is to build a new nuclear power plant, alongside its sole existing one in the southern city of Bushehr, by early 2014, state television reported on Sunday, quoting the head of the country's Atomic Energy Organisation. "Iran will build a 1,000-megawatt nuclear power plant in Bushehr next year," the television quoted Fereydoon Abbasi Davani as saying. He was referring to the Iranian calendar year running from March 2013 to March 2014. The Mehr news agency suggested the timeline could be longer, quoting Abbasi Davani as saying: "We will begin plans for a 1,000-megawatt plant in Bushehr next year." He said foreign contractors would be needed for its construction. The Mehr and ISNA news agencies both reported another nuclear plant was also planned and could be built in coming years.
ISNA quoted Abbasi Davani as saying that designs for a 360-megawatt facility in Darkhovin, in the southwestern province of Khuzestan near the border with Iraq, "have been finished and we are reviewing it."
He did not elaborate. Darkhovin, a project initiated by France but abandoned after Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, has been stalled because of European sanctions against Tehran.
In September 2011, deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Ahmadian said Iran was seeking foreign help to finish the project. The current Bushehr nuclear plant was started by German engineers in the 1970s and was completed by Russia, which continues to help keeping it running and provides fuel for it. Inaugurated in 2010, it is due to come fully on-line in November this year.
In addition, Iran has a research reactor operating in Tehran that is used to make medical isotopes for patients with cancer and other illnesses.
A new Bushehr plant would boost electricity production in Iran, which has some of the world's biggest reserves. State television made its announcement in the wake of talks in Baghdad on Wednesday and Thursday between Iran and world powers that focused on Tehran's controversial nuclear programme. Those talks almost collapsed because of the very different positions held by the two sides, but agreement was finally reached to hold another round in Moscow on June 18-19. Iran insists its nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful and aimed at producing energy and medical isotopes.
The world powers -- the Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States -- suspect the programme could include work towards developing a nuclear weapons capability, and they have backed UN Security Council resolutions demanding Iran curb its activities

Syrian government denies attack that killed more than 100, UN council condemns shelling

By Ben Hubbard,Edith M. Lederer, The Associated Press | The Canadian Press
BEIRUT - Syria on Sunday strongly denied allegations that its forces killed scores of people — including women and children — in one of the deadliest days of the country's uprising, but the U.N. Security Council after an emergency session condemned government forces for shelling residential areas.
The killing of more than 100 people in the west-central area of Houla on Friday brought widespread international criticism of the regime of President Bashar Assad, although differences emerged from world powers over whether his forces were exclusively to blame.
The Security Council issued a press statement Sunday that "condemned in the strongest possible terms" the killings in Houla. It blamed Syrian forces for artillery and tank shelling of residential areas. It also condemned the killings of civilians "by shooting at close range and by severe physical abuse," but avoided saying who was responsible for these attacks.
The council's statement said the "outrageous use of force" against civilians violated international law and Syrian government commitments under previous U.N. resolutions to stop all violence, including the use of heavy weapons in populated areas. It said "those responsible for acts of violence must be held accountable," and asked the U.N. observer mission in Syria and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to investigate the attacks and report back to the council.
Britain and France had proposed issuing a press statement condemning the attack on civilians and pointing the finger at the Syrian government for Friday's massacre. But Russia called for an emergency council meeting saying it first wanted a briefing by Gen. Robert Mood, the head of the unarmed U.N. observer mission.
The massacre in Houla on Friday cast fresh doubts on the ability of an international peace plan put forward by U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan to end Syria's 14-month-old crisis.
The brutality of the killings became clear in amateur videos posted online that showed scores of bodies, many of them young children, in neat rows and covered with blood and deep wounds. A later video showed the bodies, wrapped in white sheets, being placed in a sprawling mass grave.
Mood told the Security Council that U.N. observers at the scene now estimate 108 people were killed in Houla, U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous told reporters outside the council chamber. The U.N. counted 49 children and 34 women among the dead.
Activists from the Houla area said the army pounded the villages with artillery and clashed with local rebels after protests Friday. Some activists said pro-regime thugs later stormed the area, doing the bulk of the killing by gunning down men in the streets and stabbing women and children in their homes.
The Syrian government rejected that narrative Sunday, painting a vastly different picture.
Speaking to reporters in Damascus, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said Syrian security forces were in their local bases Friday when they were attacked by "hundreds of heavily armed gunmen" firing mortars, heavy machine-guns and anti-tank missiles, staring a nine-hour battle that killed three soldiers and wounded 16.
The soldiers fought back, but didn't leave their bases, he said.
"No Syrian tank or artillery entered this place where the massacres were committed," he said. "The security forces did not leave their places because they were in a state of self-defence."
He blamed the gunmen for what he called a "terrorist massacre" in Houla and accused the media, Western officials and others of spinning a "tsunami of lies" to justify foreign intervention in Syria.
Makdissi did not provide videos or other evidence to support his version of events, nor did he give a death toll. He said the government had formed a committee to investigate and share its findings with Annan, who is due to visit Damascus in the coming days.
Throughout the uprising, the government has deployed snipers, troops and thugs to quash protests and shelled opposition areas.
A video released by the U.N. team in Syria on Sunday showed observers in Houla the day after the attack, meeting with local rebels and watching residents collect more bodies for burial. It also showed two destroyed armoured personnel carriers — suggesting that local rebels put up more of a fight than the activists acknowledged.
In a letter to the Security Council, Ban said villages in the Houla area have been outside government control but surrounded by a heavy Syrian military presence.
When U.N. observers visited the area on Saturday, Ban said they saw 85 corpses in a mosque in Taldou and "observed shotgun wounds and wounds consistent with artillery fire." He said "the patrol also saw artillery and tank shells, as well as fresh tank tracks" and observed that "many buildings had been destroyed by heavy weapons."
At U.N. headquarters, Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador Alexander Pankin told reporters as he headed into the closed-door Security Council meeting that "there is substantial ground to believe that the majority of those who were killed were either slashed, cut by knives, or executed at point-blank distance."
"We have to establish whether it was Syrian authorities ... before we agree on something," he said.
A press statement is weaker than a presidential statement, which becomes part of the council record, or a legally binding U.N. resolution, but it must be approved by all 15 members and therefore reflects strong Security Council backing.
Annan's peace plan for Syria, sponsored by the U.N. and the Arab League, is one of the few points of agreement among world powers about Syria's crisis, which began in March 2011 with protests calling for political change. As the government violently cracked down on the uprising, many in the opposition took up arms to defend themselves and attack government troops.
The U.N. put the death toll weeks ago at more than 9,000. Hundreds more have been killed since then.
Daily violence has marred the plan since a cease-fire was supposed to begin April 12. The Houla attack made Friday the deadliest day since the truce was announced, and has cast a shadow over Annan's visit. In another defiant move, Syria on Sunday denied permission for Annan's deputy to travel to Damascus with his boss, a senior Arab League official said. The rejection of former Palestinian Foreign Minister Nasser al-Kidwa was intended as a slap to the Arab League, which suspended Syria's membership and approved sanctions against it last year.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. Annan's spokesman declined to comment.
The Houla attacks caused outrage among American and international officials that Makdissi's comments Sunday failed to assuage.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague said he would summon Syria's most senior diplomat in the U.K. on Monday so the Foreign Office could "make clear our condemnation of the Syrian regime's actions." Kuwait, which currently heads the 22-member Arab League, called for an Arab ministerial meeting to "take steps to put an end to the oppressive practices against the Syrian people."
Switzerland's Foreign Ministry urged that an international inquiry be convened, saying the killings "could constitute a war crime."
In Paris, the head of the exile Syrian National Council also condemned the killings.
"The kids of Houla are the kids of all of Syria," Burhan Ghalioun told reporters. "Killing the kids of Houla is like killing the kids of all of Syria."
Anti-regime activists scoffed at the government's version of events. One Houla activist said via Skype that the area had at most 300 fighters, but that none had more than rifles and that they often lacked ammunition. "If we had anti-tank missiles, there would be no tanks left in the area," said Mohammed, declining to give his full name for fear of retribution.
Activists reported shelling, gunfire and arrest raids in opposition areas throughout the country Sunday as well as clashes between regime forces and rebels in a number of areas. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said security forces killed at least 14 civilians, while rebels killed nine soldiers.
Activist claims could not be independently verified. The Syrian government bars most media from operating in the country.
Annan's plan calls for eventual talks between all sides on a political solution to the crisis.
The U.S. hopes Russia can use its influence with Damascus to press for a political transition similar to that seen in Yemen. In February, longtime Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh passed power to his deputy in exchange for immunity from prosecution.
U.S. officials say Russia does not oppose a political transition in Syria in theory, but has not agreed to specific terms.
**Lederer reported from the United Nations. Associated Press writers Adam Schreck in Dubai and Hamza Hendawi in Cairo contributed to this report.

Security Council blames Syria for shelling Houla
Play CBS News Video
(AP) UNITED NATIONS - The U.N. Security Council has blamed Syrian government forces for artillery and tank shelling of residential areas in the town of Houla and it is strongly condemning the killing of dozens of civilians. The council said in a press statement issued after an emergency meeting Sunday afternoon that it also "condemned the killing of civilians by shooting at close range and by severe physical abuse" in Houla. It did not say who was responsible for the close-range attacks. The U.N. says at least 108 people, including 49 children and 34 women, died in Friday's attacks in Houla.
The council statement says the "outrageous use of force" against civilians violated international law and Syrian government commitments under Security Council resolutions to cease violence, including the use of heavy weapons in populated areas. Before the emergency meeting, Britain and France had proposed issuing a press statement condemning the attack on civilians and pointing the finger at the Syrian government for Friday's massacre. But Russia told council members it could not agree and wanted a briefing first by Gen. Robert Mood, the head of the unarmed U.N. observer mission. Russia called for the emergency meeting to hear Mood's report and consider a possible Security Council press statement. Mood told the council that U.N. observers after revisiting the scene raised the death toll in Houla to 108 people, U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous told reporters outside the council chamber. Mood said Saturday that observers confirmed from an examination of ordnance found at the scene that artillery and tank shells were fired. Russia, which considers Syria its closest Mideast ally, has used its Security Council veto power to block resolutions raising the possibility of U.N. action against President Bashar Assad. The assault on Houla was one of the bloodiest single events in Syria's 15-month uprising against Assad's regime.
A statement issued Saturday by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and his predecessor Annan, the joint U.N.-Arab League envoy to Syria condemned the "indiscriminate and disproportionate use of force" in violation of international law and Syrian commitments to stop using heavy weapons in populated areas. They demanded that the Syrian government stop using such weapons.
The Syrian government on Sunday denied responsibility for the Houla massacre, blaming the killings on "hundreds of heavily armed gunmen" who also attacked soldiers in the area.
Russia's Pankin said "the number of those wounded does not correspond to what you would expect in terms of destruction — You cannot have one or two houses destructed (cq) and 500 wounded with shrapnel." "We have to establish whether it was Syrian authorities ... before we agree on something," he said. Activists from Houla said Saturday that regime forces had peppered the area with mortar shells after large demonstrations against the regime on Friday. That evening, they said, pro-regime fighters known as shabiha stormed the villages, gunning down men in the streets and stabbing women and children in their homes. Britain's U.N. Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant told reporters that from the information his government has gathered "it seems quite clear that the massacre in Houla was caused by a heavy bombardment and by government artillery and indeed tanks." "And I would expect the briefing we'll receive from Gen. Mood today will confirm that. And if that's the case, we condemn it utterly," he said.
Both Pankin and Grant said the attack represents a violation of international law regardless of who is responsible. The Houla attacks have sparked outrage from American and other international leaders, and renewed concerns about the relevance of a 6-week-old international peace plan negotiated by Annan that has not stopped almost daily violence despite the presence of more than 250 U.N. observers. The U.N. put the death toll weeks ago at more than 9,000. Hundreds have been killed since.

No easy solutions in Syria
Benjamin Herscovitch /Drum Opinion
There are no easy options in the Syria situation.
There are reports that the Assad regime continues to fire on the Syrian people, while the international face of the opposition movement, the Syrian National Council (SNC), is riven with infighting.
At the same time, there are worrying signs of Islamist militants entering the fray. This jockeying for control between the Assad regime, opposition activists and Islamist militants, to name just three major players, means that predicting the outcome of any particular policy response is perilously difficult. If the complexity of conditions on the ground was not enough, the moral stakes in Syria are dauntingly high. If the international community does not arm the rebels or intervene militarily, the violence will likely continue and the Assad regime will have the upper hand.
However, military support for the Free Syrian Army (FSA) or intervention also comes with significant risks. There is the danger that removing Assad will principate internecine warfare and provide militant Islamist groups with an avenue to wield disproportionate influence. Given these complexities, Michael Brull's broad brush-stroke moralising about humanitarian interventions does not befit what should be a sober debate about the appropriate response to the ongoing violence in Syria. In the article of mine to which Mr Brull was responding, I argued that the international community should "reconsider its decisions to neither intervene militarily nor arm the FSA". I was not defending what Mr Brull erroneously calls 'brazen militarism' but simply suggesting that the gravity of the situation demands that the international community at least consider a more forceful response. Beyond misrepresenting my own views, Mr Brull also ignores recent developments in Syria. The SNC, which Mr Brull says opposes international intervention, is increasingly losing support in Syria. Tribal and minority figures have little confidence in the SNC, and it has been accused of being aloof and unrepresentative. Perhaps most importantly, Mr Brull sidesteps the true nature of the international community's choice. In the absence of military support for the FSA or military intervention, the violence is unlikely to cease. The Assad regime's attacks on the Syrian people and reprisals by comparatively poorly armed opposition groups will continue. The international community's choice is therefore not between peaceful non-intervention and violent military action. As Steven Heydemann and Reinoud Leenders observe: "The question we face at this point ... is not a false choice between non-violence and militarisation."The choice is between a continuation of what is approaching chaotic civil war and a concerted, albeit difficult and costly, international push to support an indigenous opposition.The Syrian people are demanding regime change. They have been willing to die for it for over 14 months. It behoves the international community to explore options beyond mere diplomacy to help them achieve the freedom for which they have already sacrificed so much.As difficult and dangerous as military support for the FSA or military intervention might be, Mr Brull would do well to remember that there are no easy options in Syria.
Herscovitch and Brull studied philosophy together at University of New South Wales and are friends.
Benjamin Herscovitch is a policy analyst at the Centre for Independent Studies.

Syria massacre: UK 'no right' to ban athletes
A Syrian official has said the UK "has no right" to deny their athletes access to the London 2012 Olympic games.Mowaffak Joma, chairman of the Syrian Olympic committee, said the Olympic charter forbids host countries from banning athletes. Deputy PM Nick Clegg has said Syrian delegation members with connections to the regime will be denied entry.His comments came after Syria denied any involvement in the massacre of 108 civilians in Houla. The United Nations (UN) say 32 of those killed, allegedly during and after clashes between Syrian security forces and "armed terrorists", were children under 10 years old. 'All support Assad' Mr Joma told the BBC that "the authority of any host country is limited to organising and offering all necessary facilities to all participating athletes.
"If the British government has decided to ban anyone connected to the regime and to President Bashar-al Assad, I am telling you in advance they should ban all Syrian citizens, because we all support President Assad and support Syria."  Syria's Olympic chief says the whole delegation supports the Assad regime The Syrian official added that it had been agreed with the International Olympics Committee (IOC) two weeks ago during a meeting in Russia that Syrian athletes would compete under the country's official flag of state, and not of the opposition and its army.
Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme, Mr Clegg said that, in reference to the Syrian Olympic delegation, "as a government we have recently changed the rules about who we allow into this country and who we refuse entry to. "If there is evidence that you have abused human rights and that is independently shown to be the case, you will not be able to come into this country.
"What I cannot do... sitting here is [provide] a list of the individuals to come, and are they coming as per the arrangements with the IOC." Speaking ahead of a flight to Moscow for talks with the Russian foreign minister, Foreign Secretary William Hague said that all applications to come to the UK - whether during the Olympics or not - will be looked at "rigorously and vigorously".
He added: "We have already made it clear that if people try to come in where there is information linking them to serious human rights abuses, then we have the power to prevent them coming into the country. "We do have the power to prevent them entering the UK, even when the Olympics is on."

Syria’s intellectuals between fear and integration
Rima Fuleihan, May 28, 2012 /Now Lebanon
An opposition demonstration in Syria. Too many Syrian intellectuals have not joined the protest movement against the regime. (AFP photo)
Tensions have been smoldering for more than 40 years within Syrian society, spanning over the rules of both Hafez and Bashar al-Assad. Creativity was bound and all kinds of human rights violations were committed in the country, and this goes without mentioning poverty, corruption and monopoly of power.
As the Arab Spring broke out, intellectuals—including writers, artists and media professionals—witnessed indescribable controversies, debates and enthusiasm. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak resigned, and intellectuals celebrated freedom and shouted their support to Egypt. We exchanged congratulations over the phone and Facebook, and I personally did not sleep that night.
However, many of those who shouted their support for Egypt and stayed awake until morning to celebrate victory failed to take to the streets at the start of the Syrian uprising. Many figures who were close to the opposition prior to the revolt questioned its objectives. Second- and third-tier figures moved to the forefront.
The uprising in Syria was initiated by educated Syrian young men and women. They started the first protests in Damascus and were the first to be pursued and arrested. Intellectuals are still an important part of the rebellion in Syria and are not getting the media support they deserve, even though they are characterized by awareness, foresight and diversity. This lack of exposure is linked to the agendas of some media outlets. This prevents many classes of the population from joining the uprising, and it delays the fall of the regime.
But the largest swath of intellectuals and artists remained silent. They had several concerns—including the regime’s repression, fear of arrest, murder and displacement. They also shared concerns with minorities, which the regime has been masterfully playing ever since it took power, and feared an Islamist takeover, since protests are starting from mosques. (Some young lay intellectuals, however, started out from mosques with the others, because mosques are the only places where people can gather under the emergency law.)
The regime did its part to stoke intellectuals’ fears. It claimed that the uprising was led by extremist Salafists and armed gangs. It said the rebellion aimed to undermine the Resistance. It said al Qaeda was involved to manipulate the international community’s fears.
In spite of all that, certain names from all over the Syrian religious, sectarian, political and intellectual spectrum still shone, breaking the walls of lies erected by the regime. Despite being arrested, tortured and deported, certain intellectuals called for a country that respects its citizens’ dignity, justice and freedom. Some were beaten, such as political cartoonist Ali Farzat; some were arrested, displaced or chased out, such as Palestinian leftist intellectual Salama Kayla; others were accused of treason and exposed to smear campaigns in the media; and many were fired from their jobs and blacklisted from employment.
Many intellectuals issued declarations such as the Milk Statement, calling for ending the siege on Daraa’s children, and took part in protests, coordination meetings and media events. The landmark event of the intellectuals’ movement was a protest held in July 2011. This demonstration, which started in front of the Al-Hassan Mosque, ended with everyone being arrested. As well as myself, artist May Skaff, writer Yem Mashadi, director Nidal Al-Hassan, media figure Iyad Shraygi were arrested and held in detention for four days. The Friday following our arrest was dubbed the “Friday of Freedom Prisoners.”
In conclusion, despite the regime’s attempt to distort the revolution and its routine recourse to criminal behavior, most Arab intellectuals failed to support the Syrian revolution, though never failed in the past to talk about freedoms and human rights, which are concepts the Syrian uprising is all about.

Will al-Assad depart in the Yemeni manner?
By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat
The New York Times has revealed that US – Russian talks are taking place to implement the Yemeni solution in Syria, and this is in the hopes of securing Bashar al-Assad’s withdrawal from power along the lines of Yemen’s Saleh. The US newspaper says that nothing is confirmed, but that the Russian response is giving somewhat positive signals.
The question that must be asked here is: can the Yemeni model succeed in Syria? The answer is that this would be difficult, for a number of reasons, particularly as what has happened today in Syria exceeds anything that happened in Yemen, indeed there is no comparison whatsoever, for in Syria the civilian death toll at the hands of the al-Assad regime exceeds 12,000, not counting the number of missing, so who will be held responsible for all this bloodshed? In fact, merely the revelation of negotiations between the Russians and al-Assad over an exit plan would not only strain the uprising Syrian street, but it would blow the minds of the circles close to al-Assad. We are not talking about his inner circle here, but rather the security apparatus – with all its leadership and officers – for they are the ones who are primarily embroiled in the killings, not to mention the pro-regime Shabiha militia, as well as some businessmen: so what will be there fate after al-Assad?
In the Syrian case, we do not talk about the president’s sons or nephews – as we did in Yemen – but rather a significant number of military leaders, on all levels, in total numbering between 100,000 and 150,000, at the lowest estimates; they are the ones who are embroiled in shedding the blood of the Syrian people, whilst the majority of them belong to a single sect, so how will they respond to al-Assad leaving power with immunity which will likely not cover them all? Will they accept al-Assad’s safe departure whilst they face an uncertain future? From here, the mere revelation of serious negotiations between Russia and al-Assad over securing his departure may increase the chances of a military coup, as al-Assad’s protectors would undoubtedly prefer for the revolution to snack on him, rather than them. Therefore, as we have repeatedly stated, delaying resolving the Syrian crisis will only increase the eventual cost of this solution. Al-Assad’s agents who have shed the blood of the Syrian people are too great in number to be granted immunity, therefore it is difficult to expect the Yemeni solution to work in Syria today, even if al-Assad’s departure – in itself – would represent something positive.
Accordingly, this complexity is not just related to the circles close to al-Assad, but we must also take into account the Iranian position, as well as Hezbollah. In the event that the US – Russian project is serious, then Iran – along with Hezbollah – will rush to support a quick coup in Syria; Tehran is keen to have a role in any change in Syria, and this is in order to protect its own interests, as well as the interests of Hezbollah. Iran could do this, particularly if it is certain that the likelihood of al-Assad’s departure is greater than at any time before. One might ask: isn’t it possible that Russia will try to help itself by organizing a coup of this kind, along with the Iranians and senior Alawite officers? The answer is: anything is possible, particularly when all al-Assad’s own allies are now aware that he is the source of a major dilemma for them today.
Therefore it is important that these initiatives do not grant al-Assad more time, and any such initiative must be thought out carefully, along with the continuation of the serious work to bring down the al-Assad regime and save Syria and the Syrian people, not to mention the region as a whole.