Bible Quotation for today/Faith Does Miracles
Matthew 08/05-11: "When he entered Capernaum, a centurion
approached him and appealed to him, saying, "Lord, my servant is lying at
home paralyzed, suffering dreadfully." He said to him, "I will come and cure
him." The centurion said in reply, "Lord, I am not worthy to have you enter
under my roof; only say the word and my servant will be healed. For I too am
a person subject to authority, with soldiers subject to me. And I say to
one, 'Go,' and he goes; and to another, 'Come here,' and he comes; and to my
slave, 'Do this,' and he does it." When Jesus heard this, he was amazed and
said to those following him, "Amen, I say to you, in no one in Israel have I
found such faith. I say to you, many will come from the east and the west,
and will recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob at the banquet in the
kingdom of heaven,"
Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters
& Releases from miscellaneous sources
Why Europe isn’t blacklisting Hezbollah/By: Ana
Maria Luca/Now Lebanon/ December 03/12
Tripoli’s Salafists/By: Hazem Saghiyeh/Now
Lebanon/ December 03/12
Erdogan, Putin and Syria/By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq
Al-Awsat/December
03/12
Washington heading towards fundamental
changes/By Emad El Din Adeeb/Asharq Alawsat/December 03/12
Latest News Reports From
Miscellaneous Sources for December 03/12
Future bloc MP Okab Sakr admits to weapon contacts
with Syria rebels
Syria TV airs images of dead Lebanese Salafists
Future rally lashes out at Hezbollah
Hezbollah: March 14 promotes Israeli demands
Assir supporters peacefully rally in Sidon
Assir march peaceful amid tensions, security
Can Lebanon ever be green again?
Syria crisis weighs on Lebanon economy
Sleiman urges youths to avoid conflicts
Killer of Lebanese soldier is weapons dealer, army
says
March 14 MPs Make an Exception and End Boycott of
Electoral Subcommittee
PSP Delegation, Gemayel Agree on Importance of
Resolving Political Crisis
Suleiman Reiterates Army's Role in Preventing Flow
of Arms into Lebanon
Lebanese army retaliates to shots fired from Syria
on Beqaa outpost
Lebanon’s Internal Security Forces data request
sparks Lebanon controversy
Donor countries commend Lebanese cabinet’s
commitment in Syrian refugees issue
Lebanese cabinet to help Syrian refugees, premier
says
Miqati
Opens Beirut Arab Int'l Book Fair: State Can't Rise through Involvement in
Regional Conflicts
Jumblat:
Palestinian State Will Be Established Away from Empty Slogans of Defiance
Miqati
Seeks Red Cross Help in Unveiling Fate of Fighters Ambushed in Homs, Recovering
Bodies
Egypt judges up political stakes with referendum
boycott
Hamas: State needs armed struggle with Israel
Egypt opposition calls for protest over constitution
Syria TV airs images of dead Lebanese Salafists
US “strongly warns” Assad over chemical arms
Syria says will never use chemical arms against own
people
Rivals in fierce battle for Damascus
US steps up spying on Iran's nuclear reactor,
report says
Israeli forces kill axe-wielding Palestinian
Why Europe isn’t blacklisting Hezbollah
Ana Maria Luca/Now Lebanon/ December 3, 2012
Hezbollah supporters demonstrate in Berlin in July 2006 against the Israeli
attacks on Lebanon. Hezbollah is reported to have over 900 members in Germany
alone. (AFP photo)
An unidentified man blew himself up in July 2012 on a bus packed with Israeli
tourists in the Bulgarian Black Sea Resort of Burgas, killing six people. Soon
after the explosion in Bulgaria, politicians in Israel and the United States
accused the Iranian Revolutionary Guards of orchestrating the attack and of
using Hezbollah operatives to execute it.
But most European Union states have not put Hezbollah’s military wing on its
terror organizations list. Both the US and Israel, which long ago labeled
Hezbollah a terrorist group, have increased pressure on the European governments
to ban the Lebanese Party of God. Placing Hezbollah on the terror organizations
list would lead to blocking the party’s accounts and seizing its assets in all
EU countries, cutting a large amount of its funding. But not many EU countries
are willing to do that right away.
The only European states that have labeled Hezbollah a terrorist organization
are the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The rest of Europe, however, demands
proof that Hezbollah is still a terrorist threat, the same way it asked for
proof to blacklist Hamas. The EU submitted to pressure and blacklisted the
Palestinian organization in 2003, but its politicians never complied with the
ban. Hezbollah, however, is another matter.
“Listing is about proof of involvement and chain of responsibility, but it is
also a political tool with sanctioning capabilities,” Magnus Ranstorp, a Swedish
scholar and author of “Hezbollah in Lebanon,” told NOW. “I think there is
careful monitoring of cases in Bulgaria and elsewhere by EU member states before
judgment is made. It is more useful not to list it as it closes down options in
terms of dialogue with Hezbollah,” he added. Some European countries, especially
France and Britain, were targets of Hezbollah operations, along with the United
States, in the 1980s. In October 1983 the French contingent of the multinational
peacekeeping force in Lebanon was bombed the same day as the US Marine barracks.
The French Embassy in Kuwait was bombed in December 1983. In April 1985, a bomb
in a restaurant near a US base in Madrid killed 18 Spanish citizens. Hezbollah
was also blamed for a series of 13 attacks in France in 1986 targeting shopping
centers and railroad stations, killing 13, and the March 1989 attempt to
assassinate British novelist Salman Rushdie. But European leaders think those
days might be over.
Many politicians already stated that only absolute proof that the man who blew
himself up in Burgas was really a Hezbollah operative would sway them. After the
attack, Bulgarian investigators insisted that they found no evidence of any
Hezbollah involvement.
However, Ranstorp argued that Hezbollah’s military operations are complex and
difficult to isolate. “They function and operate as an extended arm of the
Iranian intelligence,” he noted. “I think Hezbollah's maneuverability has been
restricted since 2005 and 2006 as the leadership is afraid of Israeli strikes.
In political terms Hezbollah is more vulnerable than ever, [facing] criticism
since it supports [Syrian President Bashar] Assad and is involved against the
Syrian opposition.” With Hezbollah cornered politically in Lebanon, Israel has
the perfect opportunity to push it to be labeled as a terrorist organization
around the world.
Some linked the Burgas attack to the arrest in Cyprus two weeks earlier of a
young Lebanese man with a Swedish passport who was said to be a Hezbollah
operative. The Cypriot Minister of Justice Loucas Louca stated that the detained
24-year-old displayed similar behavior to the Burgas bomber. Louca also said he
belonged to an organization that is not on a European Union list of known
terrorist groups, but refused to directly name the organization. The
Lebanese-Swedish man was arrested after a tip-off from foreign intelligence
services, among them Israel's Mossad.
A similar scenario happened in January in Bangkok, where Lebanese-Swedish
Hussein Atris was arrested for allegedly planning terror attacks against Israeli
and Jewish targets. There was not solid proof, only allegations that Atris was a
Hezbollah operative, which the party denied.
The last attack where Hezbollah’s involvement was proven was the one against the
Israeli Embassy in Argentina in 1992. All recent terrorist attacks in Europe,
such as the London subway bombing and the Madrid train bombings, were claimed by
al-Qaeda or its affiliates. Several bombings targeting Israelis around the world
have also been claimed by al-Qaeda or affiliated organizations, and never by
Hezbollah. What the European law enforcement agencies might have a problem with
is the involvement of networks close to Hezbollah in organized crime across the
continent.
In one of the most prominent recent cases, the German media reported that
Hezbollah members were raising funds by smuggling cocaine. Two Lebanese men were
arrested with over 8 million euros at the Frankfurt airport in 2008, and another
two from the same network were detained in October 2009 in Speyer. The men, who
had family members connected to Hezbollah leaders, had been moving millions of
euros earned from the cocaine trade from Frankfurt to Beirut.
In another prominent case, Lebanese Bashar Wehbe was arrested in 2011 in the
Maldives for attempting to buy weapons in Hezbollah’s name from two undercover
US Drug Enforcement Agency operatives. The agents recorded him as saying that
the weapons he was planning to purchase were destined to reach Hezbollah. Wehbe
came as a bonus in the investigation into an Iranian drug dealer who resided in
Romania and smuggled drugs from Afghanistan to Western Europe and the United
States.
Although Ranstorp said the EU could find proof to list Hezbollah as a terror
organization if it wanted to, the bloc is not interested in labeling it so for
political reasons. Unlike the United States, in the EU’s case, “listing narrows
the political options which may make Lebanon an arena where [the EU] can exert
its influence over developments,” he said.
Follow Ana Maria Luca on Twitter.
Syria TV airs images of dead Lebanese Salafists
December 03, 2012 /By Misbah al-Ali, Antoine Amrieh /The Daily Star
The conflict in Syrian is driving local violence on Lebanon's northeastern
border. The Syrian town of Qusayr is in the back and Lebanese land in the
foreground.
TRIPOLI, Lebanon: Syrian state television broadcast images Sunday of more than
five dead bodies with Lebanese identification, reporting that the men were among
21 Lebanese Salafist fighters who fell into a Syrian Army ambush Friday.
The station said that the men were killed in Tal Kalakh after sneaking into the
country from Wadi Khaled, and that others in the group had been wounded.
Late Sunday, state TV aired another report saying the Syrian army thwarted an
attempt to smuggle Al-Qaeda fighters from Lebanon into Syria through the border
Qusayr region. While, Syrian TV said some of the fighters were “killed,” it did
not elaborate on their nationalities.
There have been conflicting reports about the fate of the 21 men. Tripoli based
Sheikh Nabil Rahim, who is in contact with the families of the missing, told The
Daily Star that three of the five bodies shown on television had been
identified. He named them as Khodr Alameddine, Hussein Sroor and Abdel-Hamid
Agha.
Aside from these three, Rahim said “there are no accurate numbers of those
killed ... or information on who was arrested or managed to flee.”There was also
divergence in information about how and when the men went to Syria.
Sources familiar with the situation as well as several Free Syrian Army officers
told The Daily Star that between 25 and 27 men, ranging in age from 18 to 25,
gathered for evening prayer in a Tripoli mosque Thursday. Planning to die in
battle, some of them wrote their final wills. According to these sources, the
men hail from various areas, including Tripoli, Beddawi and Akkar, and some are
Palestinian members of the Islamist group Fatah al-Islam.
All of the men were Salafists who believe their religion dictates they should
fight Iran, Syria and Hezbollah.
The sources said that the men planned to take a smugglers’ route from the
Lebanese village of Hleit to Qalaat al-Hosn in Syria after dawn prayers Friday.
The group fell into an ambush in Tal Sirin, on the way to Qalaat al-Hasan.
These sources added that some of those who were not killed appear to have fled,
while others were taken to safety by the Free Syrian Army.
In some Tripoli Salafist circles, an account is circulating that the Syrian Army
was tipped off about the group’s presence by four men, whose nationalities are
unknown but have been named as Osama Rashad, Mohammad Rashad, Khaled Rashad and
Khaled Othman.
Another report said that the men did not all leave Thursday, and were in fact
split into two groups. According to this version, one of the groups was attacked
by the Syrian Army last week, but the announcement of their deaths was delayed
until Friday.
The father of one of the missing men is refusing to receive condolences for his
son, 18-year-old Mohammad Mir. Abu Abdullah said he has not heard anything about
his son, but knows that one of his son’s friends who went with him to Syria,
Abdel Rahman Ayoubi, sent a Facebook message saying Ayoubi had survived along
with many of his companions.
Abu Abdullah said he had received information that 17 members of the group are
alive in a secret Free Syrian Army base in Tal Kalakh, and that the wounded are
receiving treatment.
The parents of five more of the Salafists have erected a tent in the Bab al-Tabbaneh
area of al-Mankoubin area, in an attempt to pressure the government to uncover
the fates of their sons. The families involved in the sit-in are seeking
information on Malek Dib, Abdel-Karim Ibrahim, Youssef Abu Arida, Bilal Ghoul
and Abdel-Rahman al-Hasan.
Their relatives raised doubt over the authenticity of the photos aired on Syrian
state television.
“We still know nothing about my brother Malek and his companions,” Jihad Dib
said.“I ask the government and Interior Minister [Marwan Charbel] whether they
intend to take action to reveal the fate of our brothers,” Dib added. “Aren’t
they Lebanese?”
Dib said the government is working hard to find out what happened to the nine
remaining Lebanese pilgrims kidnapped in Syria in May, but is doing little to
find out the fate of his relatives.
Sheikh Mohammad Ibrahim, the imam of a local mosque who visited the protesters,
said the families of the men plan to act peacefully to achieve their goal.
“On Monday, we will hold a sit-in at al-Tal Square [in Tripoli] after afternoon
prayers. We are not acting against anyone in Tripoli ... we are [only]
interested in revealing the fate of our sons ... our problem is with the Syrian
regime and not with anyone else.”
A sit-in will also be held Monday at Tripoli’s Lebanese University Campus, where
Dib registered one day before his disappearance.
For his part, Future Movement MP Mouein Merhebi said he was proud of the
“martyrs” who fell in Syria.
Merhebi told a local TV station that the “blessed” Syrian revolution would
triumph, hoping that a similar revolution would erupt in Lebanon against “the
killers” of March 14 officials.
MP Khaled Daher, from the same bloc, said over the weekend that only four men
had been killed in the assault, adding that the Salafists were not sent to Syria
by any political group. He said they chose to fight in Syria after watching the
Syrian regime commit massacres on television, and because Hezbollah is fighting
alongside President Bashar Assad’s forces.
The Lebanese Army which deployed across Tripoli Friday, remained out in force
Sunday. There was no armed presence in the streets, but scattered gunfire could
be heard.
Intense gunfire could be heard Sunday night in Nahr Abu Ali, which overlooks Bab
al-Tabbaneh and Jabal Mohsen.
Separately, the Army said in a Sunday statement that shots were fired at 6:30
p.m. at its headquarters in Masharih al-Qaa by “gunmen from the Syrian side of
the border, prompting soldiers to respond.” The Army reported no casualties, and
said that it was boosting its presence in the area. – With additional reporting
by Wassim Mroueh
Future Movement MP Okab Sakr admits arming Syrian rebels
03/12/2012/By Thaer Abbas
Beirut, Asharq Al-Awsat – Speaking exclusively to Asharq Al-Awsat, Lebanese
Future Movement MP Okab Sakr confirmed the authenticity of audio recordings
implicating him in arms transfers to Syrian rebels, stressing that he is “not
ashamed” of his actions which are in “Lebanon’s best interest.” He said that he
is prepared for the judicial consequences of his actions and would not seek to
hide behind his parliamentary immunity. Last week Lebanon’s al-Akhbar newspaper
published recordings of Sakr organizing weapons transferred to Syrian rebel
groups, reportedly at the behest of Future Movement leader Saad Hariri. A
transcript of one recording, a phone call between the Lebanese MP and a Syrian
rebel leader, sees Sakr ask him “please tell me the weapons you want. What are
the quantities?” The Syrian rebel leader lists his requirements, which include
“300 rocket-propelled grenades and 20 launchers” adding “if it is possible,
provide 250,000 Russian rounds [for AK-47s], 300 machineguns, and some special
pieces of arms.” The Syrian rebel commander also stressed that “we need to do it
as fast as possible, because there’s a big need and the shelling continues.
People are scattered and there’s no ammunition. The men, each one barely has one
or two magazines, and there’s a large consumption [of ammunition]. Try to get
them [the arms] in any way possible, God bless you. I don’t know what to say,
after God there is only you.”These audio recordings, which have lately been
confirmed by MP Sakr, aroused considerable controversy across Lebanon, with
Future Movement opposition decrying these actions and condemning Sakr and
Hariri. Pro-Syrian forces in Lebanon have called for Sakr to be brought to
account for his arming of the Syrian rebels, calling for the revocation of his
parliamentary immunity. In addition to this, some Future Movement figures have
rushed to distance themselves from MP Sakr. Asharq Al-Awsat has learnt that Sakr
is “very angry” regarding the campaign that has been launched against him, as
well as some of the statements that have been issued against him, likening this
to a feeding frenzy, whilst intensive debate is raging within the Future
Movement regarding how to deal with this crisis.
As for the source of these recordings, Lebanon’s al-Akhbar newspaper revealed
that it had received an anonymous phone call from somebody claiming to be in
possession of audio recordings of Sakr coordinating arms deals with the Syrian
rebels. The source claimed to have worked with Sakr for more than a year as part
of an operation center established to support the Syrian revolution, adding that
several such operation centers were in existence, including in Antakya, Adana
and Istanbul.
MP Okab Sakr spoke exclusively with Asharq Al-Awsat about these audio
recordings, confirming “Yes. This is my voice and those are my words. I am not
in the habit of denying my words or voice and I am not ashamed of what I have
done and am doing.”
He added “I have always abided by the law and I am willing to accept any legal
measures and if some want to strip me of my [parliamentary] immunity, let them
do so; I am not hiding behind my immunity. However let me ask this: will the
others accused of involvement in Syria abandon their [legal] immunity and face
trial alongside me?”
Sakr stressed that “what I am doing in Syria embodies my convictions and it is
in the best interests of Lebanon. I bear personal responsible for what I am
doing.” He added “if I am called for accountability then I am ready for the
courts to take their course until the end, without any hindrance.”
As for the calls that he should apologize, he said “if – and I stress this if –
I owe an apology to anybody in Lebanon or Syria, then I will not be late in
apologizing to the Lebanese and Syrian peoples.”
He added “I have much that I will say in the near future and I will speak
frankly, and after this each party must bear their own responsibilities. I know
that what is happening is cheap exploitation of a certain incident, the
objective of which is political assassination which paves the way for physical
assassination…that is why I will respond soon to the followers of this logic.”
As for the true extent of his involvement in the Syrian crisis, he told Asharq
Al-Awsat “I will explain everything in a clear manner, and everything I say will
be recorded as I will say this live on air” adding “I will do this out of my
concern for Lebanon, first and foremost, and my conviction of the nobility and
sanctity of the Syrian revolution and the great Syrian people.” He stressed that
“historically, no people have tasted such injustice from so many countries at
one time, with the exception of the Palestinian people.”
Regarding al-Akhbar newspaper’s claims that he was acting on behalf of Future
Movement leader Saad Hariri, Sakr stressed that “Hariri asked me to provide the
Syrians with humanitarian, political and media aid – no more and no less” adding
“this campaign against me aims to suppress and distort this.”
Speaking following MP Sakr’s confirmation of the al-Akhbar newspaper
transcripts, Free Syrian Army [FSA] spokesman Louay Miqdad informed Lebanon’s
New TV that he worked with the Future Movement MP in such an “operation center”.
Miqdad stressed that these centers were not restricted to “military” operations
but included “all sorts of activities.” He also denied the reports that Hariri
could be heard in one of the leaked phone conversations, saying “it was actually
my voice” adding “I am surprised at the insolence of the media outlets in
broadcasting these recordings.”
For his part, Lebanese President Michel Suleiman called on Monday for Lebanese
politicians not to get involved in the Syrian crisis in line with the country’s
disassociation policy towards events there. The Lebanese president’s press
office issued a statement saying “President Suleiman hopes that everyone in
Lebanon remains committed to the policy that the government adopted as well as
the National Dialogue Committee via the Baabda Declaration which stipulates
distancing Lebanon from others’ conflict and not intervening in their affairs."
Lebanon’s Internal Security Forces data request sparks Lebanon controversy
December 3, 2012 /Lebanon’s Internal Security Forces wants all SMS data prior to
the October 19 car bombing that rocked Beirut. Lebanese ministers voiced on
Monday their rejection of the Internal Security Forces’ request for all mobile
phone SMS data in the two months prior to the assassination of ISF intelligence
chief Wissam al-Hassan. Interior Minister Marwan Charbel told As-Safir that the
ISF Information Branch requested the content of all SMS messages in Lebanon, but
that “the relevant judicial committee rejected the request to hand over the
content of the messages, since, in its view, it contravenes the personal privacy
laws guaranteed by the constitution.”“Therefore, another request was made for
the content of the SMS messages that circulated within two provinces only,
including Mount Lebanon.”The interior minister said that providing the SMS data
to the security forces did not necessarily entail that all their contents will
be revealed “and that the privacy of the Lebanese people will be violated.”He
added that it only the content of messages sent and received by those who came
under the security forces’ suspicion will be accessed. “The phone numbers of
political leaders and dignitaries are not included in the data lists provided to
the security agencies.”Hassan was killed on October 19 in a huge explosion that
rocked the Beirut area of Ashrafieh, which left two others dead and more than
120 wounded, in the first such attack in the Lebanese capital since 2008. The
sensitive issue of mobile phone data also prompted remarks from
Telecommunications Minister Nicolas Sehnaoui, who told As-Safir on Monday that
“accepting this violation would incur more of the same later on.”He also
revealed that his ministry received a request to hand over the contents of “text
messages and passwords of Facebook and other internet accounts of all Lebanese
across the country.”He also said that he had referred the request to the
cabinet’s general secretariat. “I have advised that it should be rejected,” he
added.
Meanwhile, in an interview with Voice of Lebanon (100.5) radio station, Justice
Minister Shakib Qortbawi referred to Article 104 of the Lebanese Constitution to
determine the legality of the data request made by the security forces.“The
issue should be put in its constitutional and practical context… Article 104 of
the constitution stiplulates that a judicial committee should be set up to
determine whether the request is legal or not.”While warning against the
leniency practiced by the interior minister with the security forces, Qortbawi
said that “the judicial committee agreed that the request is illegal.
“The French system, which is at the base of the Lebanese Constitution, prohibits
the access to nationwide information.”-NOW Lebanon
Donor countries commend Lebanese cabinet’s commitment in Syrian refugees issue
December 3, 2012 /Donor countries on Monday applauded the Lebanese cabinet’s
engagement with the issue of Syrian refugees. “The donor countries commend the
cabinet’s concerted efforts to develop its ‘Response Plan to the crisis of
displaced Syrian and Lebanese families’, launched by Prime Minister Najib Miqati,”
a statement released by the donor countries read. The donor countries also
welcomed “the formalization of a ministerial committee established to address
the challenges presented by displaced Syrians in Lebanon.”The countries also
said they “undertook to consider and review the government’s plan,” and pledged
to enhance their support to Lebanon.More than 125,000 Syrian refugees are
registered with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in Lebanon; however, some
activists say the actual number of people is much higher.According to UN
figures, more than 20,000 Syrian refugees are estimated to arrive every month in
Lebanon.-NOW Lebanon
Lebanese cabinet to help Syrian refugees, premier says
December 3, 2012 /Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Miqati on Monday said his
cabinet had developed a comprehensive strategy to help Syrian refugees in
Lebanon. “The cabinet has put [together] a clear plan that explains the various
needs of ministries and committees concerned in helping Syrian refugees,” Miqati
said during a meeting with the representatives of donor countries engaged in
helping Syrian refugees.Miqati also said that Lebanon cannot bear responsibility
for the Syrian refugees alone, and asked donor countries to cooperate with his
cabinet “to face the situation together.” Meanwhile, Social Affairs Minister
Wael Abu Faour said the Lebanese cabinet “needs a total of $179,276,320 to
provide the needs of the Syrian refugees.” More than 125,000 Syrian refugees are
registered with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in Lebanon; some
activists, however, say the actual number is much higher. According to UN
figures, more than 20,000 Syrian refugees are estimated to arrive every month in
Lebanon. -NOW Lebanon
March 14 MPs Make an Exception and End Boycott of Electoral Subcommittee
Naharnet/March 14 opposition alliance lawmakers have decided to attend the
meeting of a parliamentary subcommittee studying electoral draft-laws but they
will continue to boycott all other legislative activity, media reports said
Monday. An Nahar newspaper said that the decision to end the boycott of the
committee came following negotiations between Speaker Nabih Berri and his
deputy, MP Farid Makari, “to facilitate the discussions on a new electoral law
that guarantees the widest representation possible of all Lebanese.” However,
the deal was struck on condition that the meeting is held at the residence of
one of the March 14 MPs, including the house of Makari in Rabieh, for security
reasons after several opposition lawmakers and officials received death threats.
The committee, which is headed by the deputy speaker, includes opposition
lawmakers Sami Gemayel, George Adwan, Ahmed Fatfat and Serge Torsarkissian.
Its members from the March 8 majority coalition are MPs Alain Aoun, Ali Bazzi,
Ali Fayyad, Hagop Pakradounian in addition to lawmaker Akram Shehayyeb, who
belongs to the National Struggle Front of centrist lawmaker Walid Jumblat.
According to al-Joumhouria newspaper, Makari will visit Berri in Ain el-Tineh on
Monday to inform him about the final stance of the March 14 lawmakers to end the
boycott of the subcommittee, which was formed last month to study controversial
electoral draft-laws. Several March 14 coalition MPs warned Berri on Friday
against a call for a meeting of joint parliamentary committees to discuss the
draft-laws, saying such a move would be a “dangerous precedent” in the absence
of the opposition. They decided to form a committee to meet with Berri and
discuss with him ways to resolve the crisis. But the speaker told al-Joumhouria
newspaper on Monday that no request has been made to discuss with him the
matter. “When they do so, I will discuss with them the content of the statement
they issued,” Berri said.
PSP Delegation, Gemayel Agree on Importance of Resolving Political Crisis
Naharnet /Socialist Party delegation held talks on Monday with Phalange Party
leader Amin Gemayel to propose to him an initiative by MP Walid Jumblat to end
the ongoing political crisis in Lebanon.
“We have no choice but to discuss the matter with our foes,” Gemayel told
reporters after the meeting at the party headquarters in Saifi. He urged
officials to reach “practical results” to safeguard the country. Gemayel pointed
out that there should be no political boycott as all parties should safeguard
the constitutional institutions. “We have agreed on the importance of resuming
contacts to achieve the goals that the Phalange party and the PSP agreed on,” he
said. The Phalange leader stated that Jumblat's initiative includes several
common points, in particular, disassociating Lebanon from the developments in
Syria and resolving the social and economy issues. The PSP team has been holding
talks with major political figures to propose to them Jumblat's initiative to
resolve the country's political crisis.
The assassination of Internal Security Forces Intelligence Branch chief Brig.
Gen. Wissam al-Hasan on October 19 deepened the gap between the March 14 and 8
alliances.
The opposition boycotted political activity with its foes after it blamed Prime
Minister Najib Miqati's government for covering up the crime, calling on it to
step down, and said it would not sit at the same dialogue table with Hizbullah.
For his Part, Transportation and Public Works Minister Ghazi al-Aridi said
following the meeting in Saifi that the rival Lebanese parties should
communicate and resume dialogue to safeguard the country. The officials “that we
have met so far reacted positively with our initiative,” al-Aridi told
reporters.
He stressed that politicians must reach common grounds to end the political
crisis, reiterating that the delegation will meet with all party leaders in the
country.
“We need to defuse the tension and halt the strong sectarian rhetoric,” al-Aridi
said. He noted that dialogue should resume under the auspices of President
Michel Suleiman, saying “We have passed through more difficult situations but we
were able to safeguard the country.”The delegation has so far met with Suleiman,
Speaker Nabih Berri, Miqati, Hizbullah deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem and Free
Patriotic Movement chief MP Michel Aoun to suggest a return to dialogue and an
end to involvement in the Syrian crisis.
Suleiman Reiterates Army's Role in Preventing Flow of Arms into Lebanon
Naharnet/President Michel Suleiman reiterated on Monday the significant role of
the army and security agencies in preventing arms smuggling in Lebanon, the
state-run National News Agency reported.
“The army and security apparatus play an important role in preventing the flow
of weapons and armed groups,” said Suleiman. Moreover, the president urged
political powers in Lebanon to commit to the policy adopted by the government
and the national dialogue of dissociating the country from regional conflicts as
stipulated in the Baabda Declaration.“Everyone in Lebanon should abide by the
policy that calls for dissociating Lebanon from external conflicts,” he added.
Suleiman's comments came on the backdrop of an incident on Friday when a group
of 21 Lebanese Islamists from Tripoli were killed in an ambush in the Syrian
border town of Tall Kalakh. Media reports said that the victims were fighting
alongside the Syrian opposition. Heavy gunfire was heard in Tripoli on Friday
night between the mainly Sunni Bab al-Tabbaneh district and the neighboring
Shiite district of Jabal Mohsen in light of the incident.
Bab al-Tabbaneh has been the scene of deadly clashes with Jabal Mohsen, which
supports Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.
Lebanese army retaliates to shots fired from Syria on Beqaa outpost
December 2, 2012 /The Lebanese Armed Forces said in a statement that one of its
outposts came under fire from the Syrian side of the border in the Beqaa Valley,
the National News Agency reported on Sunday. In its statement the LAF said that
the incident took place “at 6:30 p.m. in Beqaa’s Mashari al-Qaa when shots fired
by armed men on the Syrian side of the border hit the outpost.”
It added that its troops retaliated and that no fatalities resulted from the
shooting.
According to the statement, calm was restored to the area, while army troops
intensified their security measures.
Meanwhile, Al-Manar television quoted sources as saying that “heavy clashes took
place between LAF troops and armed men belonging to the rebel Free Syrian Army
in Mashari al-Qaa.”
Lebanon’s Syrian border has experienced regular border violations, including
shelling and gunfire as well as limited incursions by Syrian troops, while the
country’s political landscape is split between supporters of the Syrian regime
represented by the March 8 alliance and Western-backed forces associated with
the March 14 coalition.
-NOW Lebanon
Killer of Lebanese soldier is weapons dealer, army says
December 3, 2012 /The Lebanese army on Monday said that the man who shot and
killed Lebanese soldier Samson Antranikian was involved in smuggling weapons
into Syria.
“We discovered that the perpetrator works in the illicit arms trade to and from
Syria, and that he has connections with foreign organizations and [other]
weapons dealers,” the statement released by the Lebanese army read. The
statement also said that “the perpetrator admitted to holding several identity
cards, one of which bears the status of a cleric, and that his real name is
Hassan Hussein Gharib.”
Antranikian was shot dead in Jounieh in pursuit of a criminal. -NOW
Lebanon
Tripoli’s Salafists
Hazem Saghiyeh/Now Lebanon/, December 3, 2012
The city of Tripoli and parts of Lebanon’s North present us with a bleak, gloomy
image, the gloominess being exacerbated by the Syrian army ambush, which led to
the death of 25 of the North capital’s natives. Not only are such events likely
to stoke the conflict between Bab al-Tebbaneh and Jabal Mohsen, but they also
threaten to expand the scope of Salafist and more extremist loyalties.
In reality, the Syrian revolution and solidarity with it have provided a fertile
ground for these movements, but their rise as such is linked to older, more
complicated reasons.
It would be no exaggeration to say that the Lebanese “law” reigns uppermost
among these reasons since the armament of one confession paves the way for
arming another one. Furthermore, excessive sectarian loyalties in one confession
pave the way for the same behavior elsewhere. Resistance is irrelevant here: We
know that Hezbollah armed its own community and drove it on a sectarian track by
forming an armed, religious and sectarian party all at once.
It is true that Tripoli’s Salafism has yet to turn into a political project,
provided that this is even possible to begin with. Moreover, the armament
imputed to it is by no means comparable to Hezbollah’s. However, it is no
coincidence that some are interpreting the developments in Lebanon, at least
since 2005 and former PM Rafik Hariri’s assassination, as an expression of this
thorny path. The main issue, here, is the so-called marginalization of the Sunni
community, which is likened to what the Christians endured under the “Syrian
tutelage”. It is a well-known fact that this marginalization culminated with the
armed invasion of Beirut in May 2008. This goes without mentioning the
repercussions of the Damascus regime’s sectarian policies on Tripoli due to its
proximity with Syria, which sometimes translated as clashes between Bab al-Tebbaneh
and Baal Mohsen.
Still, this only happened once the safety net upon which Tripoli’s inhabitants
had been relying crumbled. The Lebanese Armed Forces has but little efficiency,
the Palestinian resistance is bygone, and Tripoli’s civil organizations were all
but uprooted under the “Syrian tutelage”.
This goes without mentioning Tripoli’s suffering as a result of the leadership
void caused by the Future Movement, added to a seasonal reading of politics as
being limited to electoral seasons and petty showoff occasions. All of the above
completes the economic policy enshrined by late PM Rafik Hariri, which focuses
exclusively on Beirut and non-productive or least-productive sectors, thus
causing Tripoli’s poor to become poorer and radical tendencies among the city’s
inhabitants to thrive. This is manifested especially among youths who are
plagued by unemployment and desperately seeking job opportunities, hence their
feeling insulted and marginalized both by “Beirut as a bastion of the
Resistance” and by “Damascus as a bastion of rejectionism.”
By and large, this paved road leads straight … to Allah.
**This article is a translation of the original, which appeared on the NOW
Arabic site on Monday December 3, 2012
Future rally lashes out at Hezbollah
December 03, 2012 /By Antoine Amrieh, Hussein Dakroub/The Daily Star
BEIRUT/TRIPOLI: Future Movement’s speakers blasted Hezbollah Sunday and
reiterated March 14 calls for the government’s resignation as the only way to
resolve the political crisis during a rally in north Lebanon to commemorate a
top security official slain in a car bomb.
Also Sunday, Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai called for the formation of a new
Cabinet and a new electoral law to ensure fair representation in next year’s
parliamentary polls, while former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora demanded “a major
positive shock” through a government change.
Thousands of March 14 supporters attended the rally organized in the northern
city of Tripoli by the Future Movement to commemorate 40 days since Brig. Gen.
Wissam al-Hasan, who headed the police’s Information Branch, was killed in a car
bomb in Beirut’s Ashrafieh district on Oct. 19.
Ahmad Hariri, secretary-general of the Future Movement, said his party would not
rest before the killers of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and Hasan were
brought to justice.
“When we demand the toppling of the government, we do so because the government
was sponsored by [Syrian President] Bashar Assad, who demanded its formation,”
he added. He vowed to avenge Hasan’s killing by defeating the Hezbollah-led
March 8 alliance in next year’s parliamentary elections.
“We swear by God the Great that as we have evicted the occupying Syrian regime
army [from Lebanon] in 2005 as the price for the blood of martyr Rafik Hariri
and his colleagues, the price of your precious blood, our beloved Wissam, will
be crushing them [March 8 parties] in the next parliamentary elections,” Hariri
said.
Strict security measures were in force in Tripoli, as Army units deployed in
different areas, particularly in the Bab al-Tabbaneh and Jabal Mohsen
neighborhoods, where armed supporters and opponents of Assad have frequently
clashed.
The rally, attended by Future MPs, March 14 politicians and local dignitaries,
was held against the backdrop of tensions in Tripoli over the fate of Lebanese
Islamist fighters who were reported to have been killed in an ambush by Syrian
troops in the town of Tal Kalakh last week.
In addition to demanding the government’s resignation and Hezbollah’s
disarmament, Future MPs voiced strong support for the Syrian armed rebellion
against the Assad regime.
Future MP Nohad Mashnouq slammed Prime Minister Najib Mikati, accusing him of
failing to address security incidents in Lebanon. He also said the March 14
coalition would not return to National Dialogue before the government’s
resignation.
“Haven’t you grown tired of half stances and half words? There is no
middle-of-the road between a criminal and a victim. Where is the truth and
lies?” Mashnouq said, addressing Mikati. “Your only choice is to lift the
curtain to a new national scene in which you take the initiative for a neutral
government.”
Mashnouq praised President Michel Sleiman’s stances, but stressed that an
inter-Lebanese dialogue, which the president had unsuccessfully tried to
convene, had not protected the country from political assassinations.
“What has Dialogue achieved for the martyrs?” asked Mashnouq, addressing the
president.
“No, your Excellency Mr. President, don’t put us in a corner of Dialogue. We
will return to Dialogue only after the resignation of the government of
assassination and under one slogan: ‘No arms except under the state’s command,’”
he said, referring to March 14 demands for Hezbollah to hand over its weapons to
the Lebanese Army.
Mashnouq also vowed to avenge the death of Hasan. “We will avenge you, Wissam,
in Lebanon and in Syria,” he said. He added that the Future Movement’s support
for the Syrian revolution was not an accusation, but something to be proud of.
He lashed out at Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah for supporting the
Syrian regime. He said Nasrallah’s political blueprint contained nothing but
“insult, injustice and suppression.”
Tripoli’s Future MP Mohammad Kabbara accused the Mikati government of
representing Hasan’s killer, saying its resignation was “a jihadist duty.”
“Bringing down the government is a right which we exercise. It is even a
jihadist duty which we must perform,” he said. “Let’s say it frankly and clearly
without ambiguity: Our cause is to stop the killing and punish the killers.
Toppling the government is a minor detail in the course of punishing the
killers.”
Dinnieh/Minyeh Future MP Ahmad Fatfat slammed Hezbollah, accusing it of seeking
to put Lebanon under Iran’s influence. “We are facing a dangerous stage, a stage
in which they [Hezbollah] will try to impose Iranian tutelage over Lebanon,”
Fatfat told the rally.
“But we say that they must realize that Hasan’s martyrdom has opened the battle
for Lebanon’s martyrdom. Therefore, we fear only God. We will face them with a
civilian resistance. As we have won over Assad in Lebanon, we will win over the
Iranian tutelage,” he added.Meanwhile, Rai called for the formation of a new
Cabinet and a new electoral law to ensure a fair representation in next year’s
parliamentary polls.
Speaking at a Mass at the Maronite patriarch’s seat in Bkirki, north of Beirut,
Rai said the new government should act to resolve the deepening socio-economic
crisis in the country.
He urged rival leaders to end their political divisions through dialogue,
consultations and national reconciliation. “They must begin with drawing up a
new election law suitable for a proper representation in Parliament ... and the
principles of equal seats in Parliament [between Christians and Muslims] and
sound and calm common coexistence,” Rai said.
For his part, Siniora said he reiterated during a meeting with Sleiman Saturday
the March 14 position that the formation of a new Cabinet was the key to
resolving the political crisis.
“A major positive shock is needed through the formation of a non-partisan
government to oversee [next year’s] parliamentary elections,” Siniora told The
Daily Star. “The March 14 stance is still the same: No return to Dialogue before
a Cabinet change.” Responding to Siniora’s demand, Sleiman told the head of the
parliamentary Future bloc that the Constitution did not empower him to change
Cabinets and that this matter was left to the parliamentary majority to decide,
a political source told The Daily Star.
Assir supporters peacefully rally in Sidon
December 02, 2012/ By Mohammad Zaatari The Daily Star
SIDON, Lebanon: Around 1,500 supporters of Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir rallied
peacefully Sunday in the southern city of Sidon amid tight security measures.
Addressing those who had responded to his call to rally, the controversial
sheikh slammed what he called Hezbollah’s “hegemony” in Lebanon through the
force of weapons. “Some people are deliberately trying to create hegemony in
Lebanon through their arms,” Assir said. Assir accused Hezbollah chief Sayyed
Hasan Nasrallah and Amal leader Nabih Berri of monopolizing decision-making
within the Shiite sect in Lebanon.
“We want to live in peace with all sects, Sunnis, Shiites and Christians,” said
Assir. Lebanese Army units deployed from the morning in Sidon amid concerns of
security incidents in the coastal city, and strict security measures were
implemented to maintain calm ahead of the rally. Interior Minister Marwan
Charbel personally headed to the city at around noon and held several meetings.
Before settling at Morjan roundabout crossroad where the two-hour sit-in was
held, Assir supporters roamed Sidon streets, raising black flags and cheering
slogans against Nasrallah and vowing to get revenge for the death of the three
people who were killed in the November unrest in the city, two of whom were
Assir’s bodyguards. Some Syrians and youth from the northern city of Tripoli
also took part in the rally and cheered slogans against the Assad
regime.Vehicles carrying Assir supporters were out in the city of Tripoli over
the weekend, with supporters making calls via speaker for residents to gather at
the Nour Square in Tripoli and head to Sidon to take part in Assir’s protest.
Protestors blocked a secondary road in Sidon after getting permission from the
relevant authorities, while the Beirut-South Lebanon highway remained open. The
sheikh, a staunch opponent of Hezbollah, has held frequent protests in the city
to criticize the Assad regime and the support it enjoys from Hezbollah.
Local media reports said that Sunday’s sit-in is to commemorate the three who
were killed during the November unrest in the city. Last month, deadly clashes
erupted in Sidon between supporters of Assir and Hezbollah. The clashes raised
tension in the coastal city and prompted the Lebanese Army and security forces
to expand their deployment in Sidon and take exceptional security measures in
the city. Speaking to the Kataeb-run Voice of Lebanon radio station, Interior
Minister Marwan Charbel said earlier Sunday that the security forces will do
their best to preserve security in Sidon and keep things under control. He
stressed that the Army and security forces will deploy heavily in the city to
prevent any unrest
Hezbollah: March 14 promotes Israeli demands
December 03, 2012/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: A senior Hezbollah official accused
opposition March 14 parties Sunday of promoting the United States’ and Israel’s
demands with their repeated calls for the party to hand over its arms to the
Lebanese authorities. “The March 14 team is demanding from Hezbollah what
America and Israel are demanding. Their speeches outdo the Israeli discourse in
allegations, lies and attempts to blackmail the resistance and distort its
reputation,” Sheikh Nabil Qaouk, deputy head of Hezbollah’s Executive Council,
told a rally in the southern town of Blida near the border with Israel.
Referring to parcels of Lebanese lands still under Israeli occupation in the
south, he said: “They [March 14 parties] wish that the Shebaa Farms and Kfar
Shuba hills are not Lebanese because they do not want the resistance.”
Reiterating Hezbollah’s commitment to armed struggle to liberate Lebanese land
and defend the country against a possible Israeli attack, Qaouk said: “The price
for the March 14 team’s targeting of the resistance is paid by the Arabs. Arab
spending is increasing as we approach the parliamentary elections through which
they want to regain power and target the resistance.
Assir march peaceful amid tensions, security
December 03, 2012/ By Mohammed Zaatari The Daily Star
SIDON, Lebanon: A rally in Sidon organized by Sunni Sheikh Ahmad Assir took
place without incident amid tightened security Sunday, with at least 1,500
protesters marching alongside the preacher. Supporters of Assir marched from the
Bilal Ben Rabbah Mosque to the Morjan roundabout in protest against last month’s
killing of two of the sheikh’s bodyguards during clashes with members of
Hezbollah.
The rally, which kicked off at noon, attracted many people from the Bekaa town
of Majdel Anjar and Tripoli.Supporters of Jamaa al-Islamiya also took part in
the demonstration.
In a speech at the end of the rally, Assir accused the Lebanese Army of
conducting biased investigations based on sectarian identity. Assir also said
Hezbollah was using its arms in Lebanon to impose its hegemony over different
Lebanese groups.“Some people are deliberately trying to create hegemony in
Lebanon through their arms,” he said.
Assir accused Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah and Amal leader Nabih Berri
of monopolizing decision-making within the Shiite sect in Lebanon.
Addressing the country’s Shiite community, Assir said: “We want to live in
harmony and peace together. Tell me of one incident in which we attacked the
Shiites.”
“We honestly want to live in peace with all sects, Sunnis, Shiites and
Christians, and I am surprised how some believe this is impossible.”
During his speech, Assir praised the families of men from Tripoli who were
reportedly killed by the Syrian regime army in the Syrian town of Tal Kalakh
over the weekend.
Assir said he was still against any Lebanese intervention in the Syrian
conflict. “We heard recently from some media outlets and political parties that
Lebanese fighters were killed in Syria, [the media is] trying to make us forget
what Hasan Nasrallah and his shabbiha did in Syria.”
“We believe that whoever first opened the door [to Syria] by backing the
murderer and oppressor Bashar Assad is to be blamed,” Assir added.
“I repeat again: We do not have any interest in taking part in the fight [in
Syria] but there is a difference between those who stand by the oppressor and
murderer Bashar and those who stand by Hamzeh Khatib and Talal al-Malouhy,”
Assir said, referring to the 13-year-old Syrian boy who was killed in custody
last year and the 21-year-old Syrian woman who has been imprisoned since 2009.
Lebanese Army units deployed Sunday morning amid concerns of possible violence
during the rally.
Interior Minister Marwan Charbel went to the city at around noon to hold several
meetings, and strict security measures were implemented ahead of the rally in
order to maintain calm.
Speaking to the Kataeb-run Voice of Lebanon radio station, Charbel said security
forces were on high alert throughout the day Sunday to ensure the protest was
carried out peacefully.
Before stopping at the Morjan roundabout where the two-hour sit-in was held,
Assir supporters marched through Sidon’s streets, raising black flags and
shouting slogans against Nasrallah and vowing to avenge the deaths of Assir’s
supporters. Some Syrians and youth from the northern city of Tripoli also took
part in the rally and chanted slogans against the Assad regime.
Assir supporters had taken to the streets of Tripoli over the weekend, using
loudspeakers to encourage residents to gather at the city’s Nour Square before
traveling together to Assir’s protest.
Demonstrators blocked a secondary road in Sidon after getting permission from
the Interior Ministry, while the Beirut-South Lebanon highway remained open.
The sheikh, a staunch opponent of Hezbollah, has held frequent protests in the
city to criticize the party and the Assad regime.Local media reports said that
Sunday’s sit-in was to commemorate three men who were killed during the November
clashes between Assir and Hezbollah supporters. Two bodyguards of Assir and an
Egyptian bystander were killed and at least five others wounded.
The violence erupted after Assir and his supporters attempted to remove a
billboard with a photograph of the Hezbollah leader in the Taamir neighborhood
on the outskirts of Ain al-Hilweh refugee camp.
Israeli forces kill axe-wielding Palestinian
December 3, 2012 /Israeli forces from the Shin Bet internal security agency shot
dead a Palestinian in the West Bank on Monday after he rammed their car and
attacked them with an axe, the intelligence agency said. "During the course of
Shin Bet operations in the Deir Sharaf area, a Palestinian vehicle rammed into a
military jeep. After the deliberate hit, the jeep flipped and its occupants were
all lightly injured," the agency said. "Shortly afterwards, the Palestinian
driver got out of his vehicle and approached the jeep wielding an axe and
shouting Allahu akbar," it said in a statement.
"He injured two of the people in the jeep with the axe. One of the Shin Bet
agents fired at the terrorist and killed him."
The agency said "preliminary information" suggested the man was from a village
in the northwest of the West Bank, near the city of Tulkarem.
Earlier, Israeli police had said the jeep was carrying Israeli soldiers.
Palestinian security sources said they had been informed of the incident, but
the area where it took place had been declared a closed military zone. They
identified the man as Hatem Shabib, from a village near the northern West Bank
city of Tulkarem.
-AFP
US “strongly warns” Assad over chemical arms
December 3, 2012 /US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday issued a
"strong warning" to the regime of Bashar al-Assad over the potential use of
chemical weapons against the Syrian people.
"This is a red line for the United States," Clinton said after meeting Czech
Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg.
"Once again we issue a very strong warning to the Assad regime that their
behavior is reprehensible. Their actions against their own people have been
tragic," she added.
"I'm not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of
credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons
against their own people, but suffice it to say that we're certainly planning to
take action if that eventuality were to occur.”"There is no doubt that there is
a line between the horrors that they [the Assad regime] have already inflicted
on the Syrian people and moving to what would be an internationally condemned
step of utilizing chemical weapons," Clinton said, without providing further
details on the nature of the planned action.
The warning came as the New York Times reported Monday that the Americans and
Europeans had sent warnings via intermediaries to the Syrian regime after
detecting movement of chemical weapons by the Syrian military in recent days.
"The activity we are seeing suggests some potential chemical weapon
preparation," one US official told the daily, which added that the activity over
the weekend has set off a flurry of emergency communications among the Western
allies. NATO is preparing to meet on Tuesday for two days of talks, with the
brutal conflict in Syria set to top the agenda.
On Sunday, a senior US State Department official told reporters travelling with
Clinton that Washington was "hopeful that NATO will be in a position to respond
positively and agree to help Turkey bolster its air defenses" by approving
Ankara's request to deploy Patriot missiles on the border with Syria. "If NATO
takes a positive decision to do it... I think it would still probably be at
least a matter of weeks," the official said, asking to remain anonymous, as
Clinton arrived in the Czech Republic on the first stop of a five-day Europe
trip.The British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says more than 41,000
people, including thousands of infants, children and women, have perished since
the uprising against Assad's regime erupted in March 2011.-AFP
Syria says will never use chemical arms against own people
December 3, 2012 /Syria will "never, under any circumstances,"
use chemical weapons against its own people, a Foreign Ministry official
insisted on Monday. "In response to the statements of the US foreign minister,
Syria confirms repeatedly it will never, under any circumstances, use chemical
weapons against its own people, if such weapons exist," he said, quoted on state
television. After a New York Times report over detected movement of chemical
weapons by the Syrian military, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a
warning to Damascus on Monday. "This is a red line for the United States," she
said on the eve of a NATO meeting in Brussels. "Once again we issue a very
strong warning to the [President Bashar al-] Assad regime." A US official told
The New York Times: "The activity we are seeing suggests some potential chemical
weapon preparation."The unnamed Foreign Ministry official in Damascus insisted
his country was "defending its people by fighting terrorists linked to Al-Qaeda"
and accused the United States and other "known countries" of backing the
jihadists.Syrian authorities and state media have labeled all armed opposition
fighters as foreign-backed terrorists since the uprising against Assad's regime
broke out in March 2011.-AFP
Egypt judges up political stakes with referendum boycott
December 3, 2012 /A man sitting on the steps of the Supreme
Constitutional Court holds up a picture of President Mohamed Morsi during a
protest in support of Egyptian leader.
Egyptian judges refused on Sunday to oversee a referendum due in less than two
weeks on a controversial new constitution drafted by an Islamist-dominated
panel, sharply upping the stakes of a standoff with the Islamist president.The
announcement by the Judges Club, which represents judges nationwide, came after
Egypt's top court began an open-ended strike in the face of a mass protest
outside the courthouse by supporters of President Mohamed Morsi opposed to their
ruling on the legality of the panel that drew up the draft charter.
Judges traditionally supervise elections in Egypt, giving them a seal of
legitimacy, but they have been openly at loggerheads with Morsi since he issued
a decree last month placing both his decisions and the charter panel beyond
their scrutiny. The standoff has polarized Egyptian opinion and sparked the
biggest political crisis since Morsi assumed power in June as the country's
first ever civilian president and its first elected leader since the overthrow
of veteran strongman Hosni Mubarak in a popular uprising early last year.
"It has been agreed by all the judges of Egypt and the Judges Clubs outside the
capital not to supervise a referendum on the draft constitution and to boycott
it," the head of the Judges Club, Ahmed al-Zind, said. The charter, adopted by
the panel on Friday in the face of a boycott by liberals and Christians, has
been criticized for paving the way to a strict interpretation of Islamic law and
for failing to secure key rights. It is due to be put to a referendum on
December 15 under an accelerated timetable for a transition to a new political
system being championed by Morsi and his Islamist backers in what they say is an
effort to turn the page on the turmoil since Mubarak's overthrow.
A judicial boycott of the referendum could further cast doubt on its legitimacy
as the opposition prepares to escalate protests against the charter and Morsi's
adoption of sweeping powers that critics describe as dictatorial. Morsi's
supporters accuse the judges of being elitist holdouts from the Mubarak era and
of standing in the way of public support for the Islamists expressed in repeated
votes since the strongman's ouster early last year.
"The will of the people is stronger than the will of a few judges," said Ismail
Ahmed, 39, as he joined protesters outside the Supreme Constitutional Court
ahead of its threatened ruling on the charter panel.
A senior Islamist who helped draft the new constitution attacked the
constitutional court as "highly politicized" and said liberal opponents had been
unwilling to compromise on the charter.
Amr Darrag of the Freedom and Justice Party, political arm of the Muslim
Brotherhood, insisted that "the amount of freedoms in terms of rights and
freedoms for people, for minorities... are unprecedented in this constitution."
He said women were guaranteed equal rights by the charter, adding that the
constitution's role was not to change culture. "[This is] a culture not willing
to have a woman as a president," he said, referring to a newspaper poll.
Hundreds of thousands of Islamist protesters gathered on Saturday in support of
Morsi, his sweeping powers and the draft constitution, a day after crowds
thronged to Cairo's Tahrir Square to denounce his "dictatorial" decree. The
Supreme Constitutional Court said it would "suspend work for an indefinite
period... and until there is no more psychological and material
pressure."Hundreds of pro-Morsi demonstrators blocked off a main road that runs
along the Nile to the courthouse and surrounded entrances to its precincts.The
judges responded by calling an "administrative delay" to Sunday's session,
prompting the protesters to head home from the courthouse, an AFP correspondent
reported.A ruling by the court on Sunday would have defied Morsi's presidential
decree that barred any judicial body from dissolving the constituent
assembly.The November 22 decree sparked popular unrest, with the constitution,
which had been due for more deliberation, being rushed through days later.The
National Rescue Front—a coalition of Morsi opponents led by Mohamed ElBaradei,
the former UN nuclear watchdog chief; ex-Arab League chief Amr Mussa; and former
presidential candidate Hamdeen Sabbahi—has urged its supporters to keep up the
momentum of the protest movement. They called for a mass rally outside the
presidential palace on Tuesday to protest against the referendum, the
constitution and Morsi's new powers, in a march they dubbed "the final
warning.”-AFP
US steps up spying on Iran's nuclear reactor, report
says
December 3, 2012 /The reactor at Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant, which the US is
reportedly increasingly spying on. (AFP/Mehr/Majid Asgaripour)
US intelligence agencies have significantly stepped up spying operations on
Iran's Bushehr nuclear reactor prompted by concerns about the security of
weapons-grade plutonium there, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday.Citing
unnamed US officials, the newspaper said the increased US surveillance of
Bushehr has been conducted in part by US unmanned drones operating over the
Gulf.
The effort resulted in the interception of visual images and audio
communications coming from the reactor complex, the report said.Iran says its
nuclear program is peaceful but many in the international community suspect its
real aim is to develop nuclear weapons.The UN Security Council has imposed four
rounds of sanctions on Iran which have been augmented this year by painful
Western restrictions on its vital oil exports, leading to serious economic
problems.Tehran suggested that a US drone was spying on Bushehr on November 1
when it sent Iranian fighter jets to pursue the unmanned craft, firing at it but
missing, the US paper said.But according to US officials, the drone was
conducting surveillance that day, but not on Bushehr, The Journal said.The
stepped up surveillance came after the US government became alarmed over
activities at Bushehr, especially the removal of fuel rods from the plant in
October, just two months after it became fully operational, the paper said.
Tehran formally protested the Pentagon's spying activities in a November 19
letter to United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, The Journal said.The
complaint charged that the United States has repeatedly violated Iranian
airspace with its drone flights, according to the paper.AFP
Erdogan, Putin and Syria
By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat, the
Today, Russian President Vladimir Putin is scheduled to arrive in Istanbul where
a number of economic agreements between the two countries will be signed. Of
course, the issue of the Syrian crisis will be a prominent subject of discussion
in the meeting between the Turkish Prime Minister and the Russian President, so
should we be expecting, or waiting for, a change in the Russian stance towards
the Syrian revolution?
Nothing is certain; all we have to go on are leaks and indications. For example,
the Russian Ambassador to Ankara recently said that his country wants to move on
from the incident when a Syrian plane, suspected of transporting Russian weapons
to the al-Assad regime, was forced to land in Turkey in October, saying that
“the sooner we overcome this infamous incident the better!”. Of course the
question here is: Better for whom? Would it be better for Turkey, with its
security, politics and economy that are being adversely affected by the Syrian
crisis? Or would it be better for Moscow, which has gone to great lengths to
indulge in the Syrian bloodshed, from supporting al-Assad with arms to using its
veto at the UN Security Council? It is in Turkey’s interests for its Syrian
neighbor to be secure and peaceful, and this will only be achieved by putting an
end to al-Assad’s crimes and honoring the desire of the Syrian people, more than
40,000 of whom have now fallen victim to the al-Assad regime. It is not
immediately clear or understandable what Russia stands to achieve from endorsing
a man who kills his own people, the tyrant of Damascus, especially as the battle
has now reached the Syrian capital Damascus, not just the outskirts of the city.
It is clear that the Syrian revolutionaries want to overthrow the regime
directly, not just capture cities, and the reality on the ground dictates that
Russia’s interests in al-Assad's survival, whatever they might be, have become
threatened, especially as the battle is beginning to surround the tyrant. If it
was simply a matter of political cost then Russia would certainly pay a very low
price at the moment, given the developments on the ground, and thus Russia’s
interests are incomprehensible, especially with its excessive defense of
al-Assad.
Highly informed sources have revealed that the Russians are saying they are now
in a stage of re-evaluating their stance towards Syria, and Bashar al-Assad, and
this is something that they have alluded to in several recent meetings in the
region. This is also what Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is
striving to achieve, having indicated his desire to exert efforts to convince
the Russians to amend their stance towards Syria. Erdogan said: “Putin arrives
in Turkey on Monday… We are going to discuss this question in depth", suggesting
that the cards are in Russia’s hands. He went on to say: “If Russia shows a more
positive position, that could push Iran to re-examine the situation”. On the
other hand, Arab parties concerned with the Syrian issue say that they are no
longer interested in Russian statements and hints, or even promises. According
to what I heard from one figure, who is influential in Syrian affairs, talking
about the Russian stance, he said: “we are beyond the phase of paying attention
to words, we are now in the phase of actions”. However, if Russia adopts a clear
and explicit stance then of course every action has a reaction. The reason that
those concerned with the Syrian issue are adopting this kind of language now
stems from the course of events on the ground in Syria. Will Erdogan succeed in
waking the Russian bear from its slumber, and convince it that it is losing more
and more each day from its intransigent position on Syria? We will see.
Washington heading towards fundamental changes?
By Emad El Din Adeeb/Asharq Alawsat
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=2&id=320
I believe that US-Israeli relations will soon take a difficult turn at the
beginning of next year, after President Obama is sworn in officially on 20
January.
Indications of this transformation stem from four key positions:
First: the fact that there has been no meeting between Obama and Netanyahu for
an unusual amount of time in relations between Washington and Tel Aviv.
Second: The US administration has begun looking to select a high level political
personality to succeed Hillary Clinton in the US Secretary of State position. It
has been said that among the most important attributes of the new candidate is
the ability to confront the intransigence of the Netanyahu government.
Third: There is talk about appointing an alternative diplomat to Susan Rice, the
current US envoy to the UN, after her failure to handle her portfolio and with
the US role being limited in recent years to using its veto power or resorting
to diplomatic clashes with others.
Fourth: The Secretary of State’s decision and the comments from the White House
the day before yesterday, regarding the Netanyahu government’s insistence to
continue with its settlement policy, saying that it completely damages the
possibility of continuing serious negotiations with the Palestinians.
There are rumors that the US administration is attempting to market Ehud Olmert
as an alternative to Benjamin Netanyahu, as a man who would be able to negotiate
with Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority, and open the door with Hamas.
Olmert recently told CNN of his support for Palestine to become a so-called
“observer state” at the UN General Assembly, which was an encouraging sign for
the Obama administration.
Traditionally speaking, the US President is better equipped to adopt stronger
positions in his second term, especially with matters relating to Israel.
In Reagan’s case, his stance became stricter after the invasion of Lebanon,
although in the case of Nixon, he didn’t get to achieve his dream of a second
confrontation because he did not complete his second term.
As for President Clinton, he oversaw the greatest American document, speaking
about the future of the Palestinian state and Jerusalem, in December 2000, 50
days before the end of his second term.
Israel must reconsider the man it wants for the coming stage: Netanyahu or
Olmert?
The US administration must also choose what it wants; a vocal position but one
that does not transfer words into action, or one that actively encourages the
completion of the two-state project along the 1967 borders?