Bible Quotation for today//Adultery
& Divorce
Matthew 05/27-
32: "You have heard that it was said, Do not commit adultery. But now I tell
you: anyone who looks at a woman and wants to possess her is guilty of
committing adultery with her in his heart. So if your right eye causes you
to sin, take it out and throw it away! It is much better for you to lose a
part of your body than to have your whole body thrown into hell. If your
right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away! It is much
better for you to lose one of your limbs than to have your whole body go off
to hell. It was also said, Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a
written notice of divorce. But now I tell you: if a man divorces his wife
for any cause other than her unfaithfulness, then he is guilty of making her
commit adultery if she marries again; and the man who marries her commits
adultery also.
Latest analysis, editorials,
studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Morsi Visits the Mullahs/By P. David Hornik/FrontPage/August 29/12
Is Iran a part of the solution in Syria/By
Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 29/12
Iran Struggles Unsuccessfully for Influence in Central Asia/By:
Nikolay Kozhanov /Washington Institute/August 29/12
Fresh Concerns about Health of Saudi King/By:
Simon Henderson /Washington Institute/August 29/12
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for
August 29/12
Appeals chamber to hear challenges to STL purview
Lebanese prisoner released from Syria after 27-year detention
Opposition MPs urge government to act on Lebanese detained in
Syrian prisons
Ministerial Lebanese Committee submits wiretapping data report
Lebanon/Judge probes possible leak of Samaha interrogation documents
President Michel Sleiman wants kidnappers brought to justice
Lebanon won’t cede role as Arab League chair
Jumblatt hits back at Nasrallah over arms and Iran’s role
Aoun: Syria Regime Must Remain Secular, Lebanon Security Won't Deteriorate
Further
Maqdah's Bodyguard Wounded in Ain al-Hilweh Shooting
Mustaqbal Calls for Expulsion of Syrian Ambassador over His ‘Crimes’ in Lebanon
Change and Reform Calls for End to ‘Politically-Motivated’ Campaign against
Qortbawi
Christian Girl Jailed in Pakistani for Blasphemy Determined to be 14 Years
Old
Muslim Rioters Attack Five Churches, Kill Two in Kenya
Iran to Continue Uranium Enrichment
Ban Ki-moon to Press Iran on Nuclear Drive, Human Rights
Morsi
visit spells cautious Iran-Egypt shift
Syria sectarian
divide turns to fear and flight
Syria exodus boosts calls for buffer zone
Deadly bombing hits loyalist funeral outside Damascus
12 Dead, 48 Hurt in Blast at Funeral of Regime Supporters near Damascus
Syrian man
threatens to blow up the Arab League
Seven Refugees Drown Fleeing Syria for Cyprus
Syrian Opposition Activists Say Too Soon for New Govt.
Aoun: Syria Regime Must Remain Secular, Lebanon Security
Won't Deteriorate Further
Naharnet/28 August 2012/
Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun on Tuesday reassured that the
security situation in Lebanon will not deteriorate further in the near future,
noting that the regime in strife-torn Syria “must remain secular because there
are religious minorities.”“I don't see partitioning in Lebanon and the security
situation will not deteriorate to an extent that exceeds what happened in the
past few days,” Aoun said in an interview on his movement’s mouthpiece OTV. Aoun,
however, lamented that the security officials “are not responding promptly
enough to the sensitive issues.”Voicing confidence in the army’s coherence, Aoun
said: “Our army is the last to disintegrate and the first to unite, because it
has a patriotic spirit and this is what it is implementing on the ground.”
Commenting on the latest deadly clashes in the northern city of Tripoli, Aoun
warned that “there are attempts to turn the incidents in the North into
sectarian ones.”“There are major violations happening on Lebanese territory,
such as the infiltration of gunmen and arms smuggling, which makes it normal to
witness chaos in Akkar,” he added.
Asked about the latest spate of kidnappings that targeted Syrian, Turkish,
Kuwaiti and Lebanese citizens, Aoun said: “If we want to criticize the trend of
blocking the airport road and kidnappings, we must first take into account the
first event: the abduction of the 11 Lebanese (pilgrims) in Syria and the
reports about their death in an air raid.”
“How do you want the citizens to react?” Aoun asked.
“I'm not justifying kidnappings, counter-kidnappings or the blocking of roads,
but we must first condemn the action before condemning the reaction,” he added.
Lebanon has been grappling with heightened security fears after a recent spate
of kidnappings in retaliation for the abduction of Lebanese citizens in Syria.
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE and Bahrain have ordered their nationals to
leave the country immediately in the face of threats, particularly against
Saudis and Qataris.
Turkey also advised its nationals to avoid non-essential travel to Lebanon after
the kidnappings which included two Turkish citizens, while the U.S. has warned
its citizens of “an increased possibility of attacks” against them in Lebanon.
The powerful al-Meqdad clan said its “military wing” abducted more than 20
Syrians and a Turkish national in Lebanon in retaliation for the abduction of a
clan member, Hassan al-Meqdad, near Damascus.
Dozens of Syrians were also kidnapped and Syrian-owned shops vandalized in
Beirut’s southern suburbs after unconfirmed reports that 11 Lebanese pilgrims
taken hostage in Syria on May 22 had been killed in an airstrike on the Aleppo
town of Aazaz.
“Turkey is not our enemy but rather a brotherly country, the same as Qatar and
Saudi Arabia, although they have distanced themselves from us. Instead of
talking about Lebanon's stability, let them find solutions to what's happening,
because they are the ones who are supporting the Free Syrian Army,” Aoun said.
The rebel Free Syrian Army has been accused of abducting the 11 pilgrims in
Aazaz and Hassan al-Meqdad near Damascus.
“The friendly and brotherly countries have disregarded the issue of the
abductees,” Aoun decried.
Asked about the recent arrest of former minister Michel Samaha on charges of
conspiring with Syrian security chief Maj. Gen. Ali Mamlouk to carry out
bombings and assassinations in Akkar, Aoun said “the issue has become an issue
of political exploitation and media outlets are also taking advantage of this
matter.”
“Lebanon is an arena for the world's intelligence agencies, that's why I won't
accuse anyone or acquit anyone and I will leave the issue to the judiciary to
perform its duty,” he added.
Addressing the issue of the 2013 parliamentary elections, Aoun said “nothing can
torpedo the elections other than a regional war,” but warned that elections
cannot be held in Akkar and Tripoli “if the security situation (there) remains
the same.”
“I'm willing to ally with the Lebanese Forces and the Phalange Party if they
convince al-Mustaqbal Movement of the electoral law proposed by the Orthodox
Gathering,” Aoun said of the law under which each sect would elect its own
representatives.
Commenting on the issue of national dialogue, Aoun said the priority must be
given to “the proliferation of arms and the absence of the state.”
He stressed that “Hizbullah's arms are necessary because they enable us to
confront Israel.”
Turning to the developments in Syria, Aoun said “the regime in Syria must remain
secular because there are religious minorities.”
“There are Druze, Christians and Alawites, so a theocratic regime cannot work,”
he said, voicing fears of an Islamist takeover of the country.
Aoun acknowledged that “what's happening in Syria is an uprising.”
“We have been calling for a change in the regime, but we do not support the
cycle of violence which is being fueled by foreign countries,” he added.
“The war is an American-European war that is being waged through the Syrian
people. They want to change the regime because they consider it to be an
obstacle to peace with Israel and an economic obstacle because it is not
allowing the passage of oil from Turkey to Europe,” he noted.
Appeals chamber to hear challenges to STL purview
August 29, 2012 01:31 AM The Daily Star
BEIRUT: The Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon will hear
arguments in public session on Oct. 1 on defense motions challenging the
jurisdiction and legality of the court. The Trial Chamber of the U.N.-backed
court, which is trying suspects in the 2005 attack that killed former Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri, ruled in late July against all the pretrial motions
challenging the STL’s jurisdiction. The defense counsel for the four indicted
men had argued that the court was established illegally, violated Lebanese
sovereignty and had selective jurisdiction, in violation of the principles of
fairness and equality before the law. In an appeal of that ruling filed on
behalf of one of the accused, Salim Ayyash, the defense maintains that the Trial
Chamber made a mistake when it ruled that Security Council Resolution 1757 was
the “sole legal basis” for establishing the STL, failing to consider violations
of the Lebanese Constitution, and when it ruled that it could not review that
resolution. The defense also challenges the Trial Chamber’s ruling on the
court’s selectivity, arguing that, “In the context of everything that has taken
place in Lebanon over the past 40 years, the creation of a tribunal to prosecute
a single incident is impermissibly selective.”
Opposition MPs urge government to act on Lebanese
detained in Syrian prisons
August 29, 2012/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Opposition politicians have urged the government to press Syria’s regime
on the issue of Lebanese detainees in Syrian prisons after the release of
Yaacoub Shamoun, who was freed after spending 27 years in custody. In a
statement released after their weekly meeting, the Future bloc said Tuesday, “We
urge the government to move forward on the issue of Lebanese detainees and
forcibly disappeared in Syrian prisons.” Lebanese Shamoun was freed three months
ago, The Daily Star learned Tuesday, and his release has given hope to the
relatives of hundreds of others who were kidnapped during the 1975-90 Civil War.
The Future statement also asked the government to “prepare the necessary
documents to press charges against those who arrested them and curtailed their
freedom in a clear violation of the law and what is considered a crime against
humanity, especially with the release of Shamoun after 27 years.”
Also Tuesday, Metn MP Sami Gemayel met with Minister of the Displaced Alaeddine
Terro at Gemayel’s office in Bikfaya, where they discussed displaced and
detained Lebanese.
After the meeting Terro said, “There is a ministerial committee tasked with
following up on the issue of detainees in Syrian prisons and we hope that this
issue moves forward today in light of the difficult security circumstances and
for the safety of those detainees.
“We hope that the Lebanese government, and other countries, pressure Syria to
release these detainees,” the minister added.
Speaking of Lebanese detainees in Syrian prisons Gemayel said, “Despite all the
denials from Syria that we have heard over the last 30 years, it is clear this
issue is as real as we claim.
“There’s a list that was presented previously including the names of more than
300 Lebanese detained in Syrian prisons, including Kataeb members, members of
the Lebanese Army, monks and others,” he added. “The Lebanese government should
have the dignity to demand their release and defend their rights.
“Today, more than ever, we need everyone to act, whether at the level of the
government, or March 14, or the Syrian opposition, or the international
community. Or any group that can help discover the fate of these Lebanese and
return them safely to Lebanon, we call on their help,” Gemayel said.
Shamoun was kidnapped in July 1985 due to his membership in the Kataeb party,
Ghazi Aad, president of the nongovernmental organization Support of Lebanese in
Detention and Exile (SOLIDE) told The Daily Star. “He was released three months
ago but he was afraid to talk to anyone,” Aad said. “Afraid someone would target
him ... maybe people in support of the regime in Syria.”
Upon his abduction, he was sentenced to life with hard labor. Shamoun was
originally held in Saydneya, north of Damascus, along with five other Lebanese.
They were then dispersed to other prisons across Syria. He was released this
year from a prison in the eastern region of Hasaka. Aad said Shamoun’s file was
eventually transferred to the civil court, making it easier for his family to
hire a lawyer and finalize his case. “This gives us hope that there are Lebanese
in Syrian prisons who are still alive,” the activist said.
An estimated 600 Lebanese were kidnapped during the Lebanese Civil War and held
in Syrian prisons, but Aad said that Shamoun and the five others were not listed
as missing in their files.
“There might be even more than we believe,” Aad said. Elsewhere Tuesday, ahead
of the International Day of the Disappeared Thursday, the International
Committee of the Red Cross called on the families of people who have gone
missing in Lebanon to get in touch with its delegation in order to provide
information on their loved ones.
Around 17,000 people went missing or were abducted during the 1975-1990 Civil
War alone.
This latest step by the ICRC is part of a project launched by the global NGO in
April to collect pre-disappearance data.
“I take this opportunity to call on all families who have a relative who went
missing during conflict or violence in Lebanon to contact the ICRC so that they
can be included in the collection of data,” said Jurg Montani, head of the ICRC
delegation in Lebanon. “The aim now is to make sure the information on the
missing persons is not lost and that it is properly safeguarded,” he added.
“This will ultimately serve to address the families’ primary need: the need to
know.” Many activists have criticized the government for inaction with regard to
Lebanese prisoners in Syria.
During a sit-in held by SOLIDE and relatives of prisoners last year, Justice
Minister Shakib Qortbawi promised protesters he would write a decree to
establish the long-awaited national commission for the victims of enforced
disappearance.The families of missing persons can register for an interview to
give information on their loved ones by contacting ICRC’s delegation in Beirut
on 03-186-386.
Lebanon/Judge probes possible leak of Samaha
interrogation documents
August 28, 2012/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: The military judge presiding over the
case of the former minister accused of plotting to carry out terrorist attacks
in the country Tuesday opened an investigation into the apparent leak of
interrogation documents to a local newspaper. Al-Joumhouria Monday published
what it said were transcripts from the interrogation of Michel Samaha, in which
the former information minister and MP confesses to plotting bomb attacks with
Syrian officials with the knowledge of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Also Tuesday, Samaha's personal bodyguard Ali Mallah and his driver Fares
Barakat Tuesday gave their testimonies in front of the Military Judge Riyad Abu
Ghida.
According to the judicial sources, investigations with the two men focused on
information they have regarding Samaha’s transport of explosives from Syria to
Lebanon, who provided Samaha with the material, to whom they were delivered and
their purpose.
Mallah and Barakat, along with the two-time minister's secretary Gladys Awada
were briefly detained for questioning the day of Samaha's arrest.
Meanwhile, Abu Ghida postponed Tuesday the testimony of the Al-Joumhouria
editor-in-chief Charles Jabbour and the paper’s manager Khalil Abu Antoun until
next week after Jabbour failed to show up.
A statement by the Journalists Union said that instead of Jabbour and Abu Antoun,
the head of the Journalists Union Elias Aoun and the union's lawyers Antoun al-Hweis
and Amal al-Baba, as well as the paper’s lawyer Elie Kfoury, arrived at the
judge's court.
Kfoury said his client, Jabbour, could not be present in court due to personal
reasons, prompting the judge to postpone the session to Tuesday Sept. 4 at 11
a.m.
Samaha, a supporter of the Syrian regime, was arrested earlier this month by the
Internal Security Forces’ Information Branch on suspicion of involvement in a
plot to carry out terrorist attacks in Lebanon in collaboration with the Syrian
regime. The government’s deputy commissioner at the Military Tribunal accused
Samaha on Aug. 11 of plotting to assassinate political and religious figures in
Lebanon and carry out terrorist attacks. The accusation also included Syrian
National Security Bureau head Ali Mamlouk and a Syrian army officer identified
as Brig. Gen. Adnan.
The three were also accused of planning to incite sectarian clashes through
terrorist attacks with explosives that Samaha transported to Lebanon and stored
after taking possession of them from Mamlouk and Adnan. According to the leaked
interrogation transcripts published by Al-Joumhouria, Samaha has confessed to
plotting bomb attacks with Mamlouk with the knowledge of Syrian President Bashar
Assad.
He was quoted as telling an informer, who was later identified as Milad Kfouri,
that the only four people who knew of the plot were Assad, Mamlouk, Kfouri, and
Samaha himself.
Samaha sought to use Kfouri to execute the plot, but Kfouri set him up by
informing the Internal Security Forces Information Branch after holding a
meeting with the former minister to plan the killings and identify the targets.
He was then wiretapped to record his meetings with Samaha.
Meanwhile, Lebanese Forces MP Antoine Zahra Tuesday called on those targeted in
the bomb plots to file lawsuits against both Samaha and Mamlouk in court.
“Such personal claims would guarantee to foil any attempts to reach a settlement
in the case,” Batroun MP told the Future News.
The apparently leaked report indicated that Future Movement MP Khaled al-Daher,
and Tripoli Mufti Sheikh Malek al-Shaar were targets of the bomb plots. Other
media reports have suggested they may have also targeted Maronite Patriarch
Beshara Rai while the religious figure was travelling in Akkar.
Zahra stressed that the investigation must be expanded, as the Lebanese state
has a rare opportunity to access evidence of such plots in Lebanon.
“Expanding the investigation would help protect Lebanon against any possible
future similar plots,” the MP said.
Lebanese prisoner released from Syria after 27-year
detention
August 28, 2012/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: A Lebanese prisoner who has been in
Syrian custody for the past 27 years was released three months ago, The Daily
Star learned Tuesday, giving hope for the hundreds of others who were kidnapped
during the Civil War. Yaacoub Shamoun was kidnapped in July 1985 because of his
membership of the Kataeb party, Ghazi Aad, president of NGO Support of Lebanese
in Detention and Exile (S.O.L.I.D.E) told The Daily Star. “He was released three
months ago but he was afraid to talk to anyone,” Aad said. “Afraid someone would
target him ... maybe people in support of the regime in Syria.”He was sentenced
to life with hard labor. Upon his abduction, Shamoun was held in Saydneya, north
of Damascus, along with five other Lebanese. They were then dispersed in other
prisons. He was released from a prison in the eastern region of Hasaka. Aad said
Shamoun’s file was transferred to the civil court, making it easier for his
family to hire a lawyer and finalize his case.
“This gives us hope that there are Lebanese in Syrian prisons who are still
alive,” the activist said.
An estimated 600 Lebanese were kidnapped during the Lebanese Civil War and held
in Syrian prisons, but Aad said that Shamoun and the five others were not listed
as missing in their files.
“There might be even more than we believe,” Aad said. Justice Minister Shakib
Qortbawi was not immediately available for comment.
Many activists have criticized the government for inaction with regards to
Lebanese prisoners in Syria. During a sit-in held by S.O.L.I.D.E and relatives
of prisoners last year, one of many held for the cause in front of the Grand
Serail, Qortbawi promised protesters he would write a decree to establish the
long-awaited national commission for the victims of enforced disappearance.
President Michel Sleiman wants kidnappers brought to justice
August 29, 2012/By Hussein Dakroub/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: President Michel Sleiman called Tuesday for the kidnappers of Syrian,
Turkish and Kuwaiti nationals in Lebanon to be brought to justice. He also
demanded the release of all Lebanese held hostage by Syrian rebels. Meanwhile,
Riad al-Asaad, commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, struck an upbeat note
about the release of the remaining 10 Lebanese hostages in Syria, saying “a
strong initiative” was under way to free them soon. The remarks by Sleiman and
Asaad came a day after a Kuwaiti citizen was freed by Lebanese security forces
from his captors in east Lebanon and three days after the FSA released one of
the 11 Lebanese hostages in Syria.
Sleiman underlined “the need to continue investigations and judicial
prosecutions in order to uncover the perpetrators and those standing behind the
kidnappings.”
“They [kidnappers] sooner or later will not be able to continue escaping from
justice and the law,” Sleiman said during a meeting with Kuwait’s Ambassador to
Lebanon Abdel-Aal al-Qinai, who thanked the president over the release of
Kuwaiti national Issam al-Houty Monday, two days after his abduction. Houty was
grabbed by gunmen Saturday outside his house in Hawsh al-Ghanam in the Bekaa
region.
Sleiman stressed that kidnappers in Lebanon should be punished for their crimes
and called for boosting efforts to secure the release of the 10 remaining
Lebanese hostages in Syria.
He expressed hope that Houty’s kidnapping would not affect relations with
Kuwait, which has “always stood by Lebanon’s side and still provides assistance
in various fields.”
Qinai handed Sleiman a letter from the Kuwaiti emir, who thanked the president
for the efforts to secure Houty’s freedom. Qinai also met with Prime Minister
Najib Mikati and Speaker Nabih Berri to thank them for their efforts to secure
the Kuwaiti’s release.
“The three leaders spared no effort at the political or security level to secure
Houty’s release. These efforts, thank God, were crowned with success,” Qinai
said after meeting Berri at the speaker’s residence in Ain al-Tineh. Sleiman
also met at Baabda Palace with Interior Minister Marwan Charbel, who briefed him
on the ongoing negotiations to secure the release of the 10 Lebanese hostages in
Syria, the state-run National News Agency reported.
Charbel remained optimistic about an early resolution to the crisis of the
Lebanese hostages in Syria after one of the abducted was released Saturday.
“Based on positive information, I am optimistic that this [hostage] issue will
come to end soon,” Charbel told The Daily Star Tuesday. “We are seriously
following up the case of the Lebanese hostages in Syria with Turkish authorities
on a daily basis.”
Charbel said Sunday that the release of Hussein Ali Omar, one of the 11
kidnapped pilgrims, set the stage for a comprehensive solution to the crisis of
Lebanese hostages in Syria as well as Syrians abducted in Lebanon.
Lebanon’s Meqdad clan kidnapped more than 20 Syrian nationals and a Turkish
businessman in Lebanon this month in an attempt to swap them for their relative,
Hasan Meqdad, who was kidnapped by Syrian rebels on Aug. 13.
The clan released all but four Syrian hostages and the Turkish businessman
Saturday in order to press for the release of Meqdad. Another Turkish national
was kidnapped by a Shiite group to press for the release of the Lebanese
hostages in Syria.
Meanwhile, the FSA commander sounded optimistic about an early release of the 10
Lebanese hostages.
In an interview with Elnashra website, Asaad said the group that kidnapped the
Lebanese, like all anti-regime military brigades spread across Syrian
territories, fell under the FSA’s command. “A serious attempt and a strong
initiative are under way to secure the release of the 10 Lebanese hostages
soon,” he said.
Grand Mufti Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani condemned the tit-for-tat
kidnappings, saying these tactics were “inhuman and contrary to religious
values.”
He said he was very happy with Houty’s release and expressed his appreciation of
the efforts made by the Lebanese state to win his freedom. Qabbani expressed
hope for the imminent release of the Turkish citizen as well as all Lebanese
hostages in Syria.
Sheikh Abbas Zgheib, tasked by the Higher Shiite Council to follow up the case
of Lebanese hostages in Syria, condemned the abduction of Arabs in Lebanon. In a
statement carried by the NNA, Zgheib said: “Arabs, particularly Saudis, Qataris
and Gulf nationals in general, should not be targeted because we consider them
our brothers.”
Meanwhile, the Future parliamentary bloc strongly condemned the kidnappings of
Lebanese, Syrians, nationals of Arab states and foreigners carried out by
“various groups under tribal, family, political and provincial names with a
political and partisan cover.”
Referring to the Meqdad clan in Beirut’s southern suburbs, a Hezbollah
stronghold, the bloc condemned “Hezbollah’s suspicious silence on these
practices [kidnapping of Syrians] which took place in an area under its control
and under its supervision, while its Secretary-General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah
claimed that the situation spun out of control.”
In a statement issued after its weekly meeting, the bloc welcomed Omar’s release
and called for freeing the remaining Lebanese hostages in Syria. It also called
for the release of all civilians kidnapped in Lebanon and Syria. The bloc urged
government security apparatuses to arrest the kidnappers in Lebanon and put them
in jail.For his part, Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun said the
Lebanese state has lost its credibility in maintaining security and holding
criminals accountable.
Aoun said on OTV Tuesday night: “Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which speak about
Lebanon’s stability and which say that they are supporting the Free Syrian Army,
can’t they tell the FSA to release the 11 [Lebanese] hostages?”
Jumblatt hits back at Nasrallah over arms and Iran’s
role
August 28, 2012/The Daily Star /BEIRUT:
Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt reiterated Monday his
party’s position on the need for a mechanism to integrate Hezbollah’s arms into
the Army’s, and to keep decisions of war and peace in the hands of the state.
“There is no doubt that the resistance’s rockets can force the emigration of
hundreds of thousands of Israelis – but the Lebanese have the right to question
their fate and future in any future war,” the PSP leader said in remarks likely
aimed at Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah.
Nasrallah is reported to have pledged to keep the Lebanese Islamic resistance
movement strong and to obstruct U.S. and Zionist designs in the region during a
meeting with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian over the
weekend. The Fars News Agency says Nasrallah also stressed that Iran plays an
indispensable role in the region.
“Foreign plots against Syria have reached a stalemate and the Islamic Republic
of Iran is supporting the righteous demands of the Syrian people, emphasizing
political solutions to the crisis in accordance with its stable stances in
defending and supporting the rights of the regional nations,” Nasrallah said,
according to the FNA.
In his weekly statement published by Al-Anbaa newspaper Tuesday, Jumblatt also
slammed the Non-Aligned Movement’s summit in Iran for its support of the Syrian
government’s “tyranny” against its people. “It is ironic for the Non-Aligned
Movement which started in Bandung in 1955 with senior figures such as Jamal
Abdel-Nasser to turn into ... a movement aligning with regimes that practice
tyranny against their people and support with all its might other regimes who
practice unprecedented killing and oppression,” Jumblatt said.
He said the proof of this lies in the protection offered by some countries to
the Syrian regime, against the people’s aspirations. The PSP leader criticized
newly elected Arab leaders for attending the meeting, indirectly referencing
Egyptian President Mohammad Mursi. He voiced similar disapproval of Palestinian
leaders’ participation in the summit, saying they should have more sympathy for
Syrians given that the regime’s practices are on par with what Israel has done
to the Palestinians – from the destruction of their cities to leaving people
homeless.
“It is ironic that some Arab leaders who were recently elected following
revolutions that toppled tyranny are participating in the meeting,” Jumblatt
said. “Instead of aligning with their people and their interests, you see them
sitting alongside those who represent a bulwark against the rights of the Syrian
people and their epic struggle.”
Jumblatt saluted the Army for restoring order to Tripoli, north Lebanon,
following weeklong clashes that killed at least 17 people and left more than 120
wounded. He said the Army proved that it “has the ability to carry out its
duties particularly when it has the political will.”
Ministrial Lebanese Committee submits wiretapping data
report
August 29, 2012/By Hasan Lakkis The Daily Star BEIRUT: A committee tasked by the
Cabinet to study French wiretapping policy submitted its report Tuesday to Prime
Minister Najib Mikati, detailing discussions on how to protect privacy while
preserving national security. The committee – which included Judge Chukri Sadr,
Army Col. Antoine Kahwagi, Ret. Brig. Gen. Joseph Nassar from the Telecoms
Ministry and Khaled Youssef from the Internal Security Forces’ Information
Branch – met with French judicial and security bodies during a short visit to
the country.
During a meeting between the Lebanese delegation and judges, who grant
wiretapping permission and specialize in terrorism, there was discussion of the
security situation in Lebanon including the exceptional circumstances of
neighboring countries. They also discussed methods that security bodies might be
legally able to use in order to take pre-emptive action to prevent terrorist
operations.
The judges showed understanding of the possibility of amending the first article
of Law 140/99 so that security forces would not always have to get judicial
permission to obtain telecommunications, the report said. The officials cited
the importance of this kind of data in allowing Lebanon’s security forces to
uncover terrorist plots, spy networks and organized crime.
Article 1 of Law 140/99 stipulates the protection of the privacy of phone, fax
and email communications, while other articles in the law list exceptions.
The transfer of telecoms data in Lebanon to security bodies is not governed by a
strict legal mechanism.
The committee was established after a showdown this summer between the March 14
and March 8 coalitions over allowing security bodies access to
telecommunications data.
This data includes International Mobile Subscriber Identity, which allows
security bodies to acquire key information about a mobile phone, including its
location and the contents of SMS messages, and allows conversations to be
monitored. March 14 maintained that such data was necessary to investigate
attempted assassinations, while March 8 voiced concern over the privacy of
mobile phone users. President Michel Sleiman eventually ceded to March 14’s
request, allowing security bodies access to IMSI. In its report, the committee
discussed information on the French system for regulating wiretapping in detail.
The report highlighted the implementation of French law 646/91, which
established that criteria for wiretapping is allowed in specificcases.
The report said security and judicial bodies in France agreed that any request
for wiretapping should be justified and limited to a specific number of people.
They also agreed that the handing over of all telecoms information for data
mining is against French law.
The French bodies said that requesting the release of information included on
phone bills deserves the same protection as wiretapping. Security bodies should
supply the suspect’s name and the alleged criminal activities in order to
justify such a move.
Requests for information must be proportional to the seriousness of the
suspected activity, the French judicial officials added.
The report added that violations of privacy laws by releasing telecoms data to
security bodies are still common in some Arab countries, such as Syria and
Libya, which are experiencing internal conflict, as well as in the U.S. after
the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The U.S. government issued the controversial Patriotic Act, which allows
security bodies to collect intelligence with fewer restrictions.
The report mentioned that some European companies offer comprehensive
wiretapping equipment to countries that allow such practices, even though they
are based in states where the acts are banned.
The committee concluded that the number of mobile phone users is growing,
amounting to 60 million in France, making it difficult to store and analyze
telecoms data.
Lebanon won’t cede role as Arab League chair
August 29, 2012/By Hussein Abdallah, Hasan Lakkis /The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanon will assume its role as the head of the Arab League next month,
sources close to Prime Minister Najib Mikati told The Daily Star Tuesday,
playing down reports that the country was subject to pressure to relinquish the
chairmanship to Libya. As-Safir paper quoted sources close to President Michel
Sleiman as saying Monday there were divisions within the Lebanese government on
whether Lebanon should assume this role. The paper also quoted a minister close
to the Progressive Socialist Party leader as saying that Sleiman, Mikati, and
PSP head Walid Jumblatt were leaning toward relinquishing the chairmanship in
line with Lebanon’s policy of disassociation toward events in Syria.
The sources close to Mikati did not comment on As-Safir’s report, but said the
idea to forego its turn in the rotation never occurred to the Lebanese
government and added that Foreign Minister Adnan Mansour is heading to Cairo to
chair Arab League ministerial meetings. Sources close to Speaker Nabih Berri
told The Daily Star the speaker has not heard any reservations from Sleiman or
Mikati regarding Lebanon’s chairmanship of the Arab League. “I do not see any
reason why the president and the prime minister would object to something that
is in the interest of Lebanon,” the source said.
“Lebanon decided earlier not to take sides as far as the Syrian crisis is
concerned ... I do not see this policy as an obstacle to chairing Arab League
meetings. On the contrary, I see it as an advantage that the Arab League should
benefit from ... It is always good to have an impartial chairmanship that keeps
the same distance from all concerned parties,” the source added.
“Lebanon successfully chaired Security Council meetings while applying the same
policy. The same should apply to the Arab League.
“Besides that, there are many issues that Lebanon can raise as the head of the
Arab League, such as Israel’s continuous violations of (U.N. Security Council)
Resolution 1701 and the situation in the Palestinian territories,” the source
noted.
“I can also assure you that MP Jumblatt’s position on this entire issue is
identical to that of Speaker Berri.”
Ministerial sources told The Daily Star that the idea of relinquishing the
chairmanship of the Arab League was proposed by a foreign “senior official” but
was not welcomed by the Lebanese government, which believes such a move could
deepen political divisions in the country.
The March 14 coalition appeared set to escalate its response to the discovery of
a terrorist plot allegedly driven by the Syrian regime, with the Future Movement
demanding the expulsion of Syria’s ambassador to Lebanon and March 14 youth
groups calling for demonstrations.
The youth movement will hold a march Wednesday in protest against what it sees
as the government’s failure to address security issues.
The march will begin at St. Joseph University’s Mathaf Campus in Beirut and head
toward the Foreign Ministry in Ashrafieh.
“We decided to play a role which is supposed to be the duty of the Cabinet and
Foreign Affairs Ministry, simply because the Cabinet is not carrying out its
responsibilities,” Simon Dergham, the head of the students’ association in the
National Liberal Party and a March 14 activist, told The Daily Star.
According to Dergham, the rally is a protest against the security situation in
Lebanon, which has spiraled out of control, and will include a call for the
swift prosecution of former Minister Michel Samaha, who has been charged with
planning terrorist attacks in Lebanon.
“We will also call on all lawmakers, including the March 14 MPs, to go to the
Parliament and cancel the Lebanese-Syrian treaty of cooperation signed on May
20, 1991,” Dergham said, explaining that such a step is necessary in the face of
continued Syrian violations of Lebanon’s sovereignty.
The Progressive Socialist Party youth movement intends to hold a similar
gathering Friday.
Kataeb MP Sami Gemayel said his party will be taking part in the rally.
“We were among the first to call for such a rally and Kataeb students will
participate effectively tomorrow,” he said.
“Such a rally is aimed at preserving the dignity of the Lebanese state when it
comes to its relations with other countries,” he added.
Kataeb’s youth department held a similar rally last week.
Future Movement MP Jean Ogassapian emphasized the importance of such a rally,
especially in light of the Cabinet’s neglect in addressing Samaha’s case.
“The government is trying to avoid taking the required measures in
Samaha’s case, and this is unacceptable,” Ogassapian told The Daily Star,
indicating that he is likely to take part in the March 14 youth rally. The
Future Movement parliamentary bloc called on the government Tuesday to expel
Syria’s ambassador to Lebanon, suspend all security treaties with Damascus and
cancel the Lebanese-Syrian Higher Council – a body formed in the early 1990s to
address bilateral issues between the two neighbors.
The bloc also urged the government to file a complaint against Syria to the Arab
League and the U.N. Security Council.
Addressing the situation in Tripoli, which witnessed deadly clashes between
supporters and opponents of the Syrian regime last week, the Future bloc praised
security forces for their efforts to restore order to the northern coastal city.
The bloc said, however, that a “security approach” on its own was not enough to
tackle the city’s problems, adding that a political solution that leads to
reconciliation between the warring parties was urgently needed.
Iran to Continue Uranium Enrichment
Naharnet/28 August 2012/Iran "will never stop" its controversial uranium
enrichment, the country's envoy to the IAEA said on Tuesday, on the sidelines of
a Non-Aligned Movement ministerial meeting in Tehran. "Our enrichment activities
will never stop and we are justified in carrying them out, and we will continue
to do so under IAEA supervision," Ali Asghar Soltanieh told reporters.
"We will not give up our inalienable right to enrichment," he said. The defiant
reaffirmation of Iran's position underscored a showdown between the Islamic
republic and the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, and the U.N.
Security Council. The Security Council has repeatedly demanded Iran cease its
uranium enrichment and has imposed four sets of sanctions on the country, which
have been greatly reinforced by separate U.S. and EU sanctions. The five
permanent members of the Security Council, plus Germany, also this year engaged
in three rounds of face-to-face negotiations with Iran on the issue, but they
ended in an impasse, with contact downgraded to telephone calls between Iranian
and EU officials.
Iran's enrichment is to again be raised this week, when the IAEA is expected to
release its latest report based on its ongoing inspections of Iran's nuclear
facilities.
Some of the report's findings have already been leaked to Israeli and U.S.
media, mainly those confirming a July 25 statement by President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad that hundreds more uranium enrichment centrifuges had been
installed. Iran's refusal to allow inspectors into a military base outside
Tehran, Parchin, could also form part of the report. Western diplomats last week
told Agence France Presse that months of clean-up work detected at Parchin
suggested the site had been "sanitized" to such an extent that a nuclear
inspection would now be pointless. Soltanieh responded by saying that Parchin
"has been blown out of proportion" and said claims of nuclear warhead design
tests there were "fabricated by foreign intelligence."
He said Iran was demanding to see the documents the IAEA was using to pursue its
suspicions about Parchin and urged the agency to "close this chapter."
He also said Iran has complained to the IAEA about the leaks.On Iran's intent to
continue enriching uranium, Soltanieh noted that the nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty and the IAEA's statutes made no explicit mention of levels of enrichment.
"The level of enrichment and how much to enrich has not been fixed in either of
those. There is no limitation," he said."Everything we do is under the
supervision of the agency," he stressed. The United States and its Western
allies, and Israel, suspect that Iran is intent on developing nuclear weapons
"break-out" capability.Iran denies that, saying its nuclear program is purely
for civilian use.Source/Agence France Presse.
Muslim Rioters Attack Five Churches, Kill Two in Kenya
Washington, D.C. (August 28, 2012) –International Christian Concern (ICC) has
learned that Muslim rioters attacked five churches and killed two people,
including a policeman, in Mombasa, Kenya. The riots started yesterday and
continued today after unknown gunmen killed Sheikh Aboud Rogo, a radical Muslim
cleric.
The Muslim attackers blamed the police for the killing of Sheikh Rogo. He is
accused of links with the Somali-based radical Islamic group, Al-Shabaab.
Christian leaders are enraged that their churches were targeted by the Muslim
rioters. Speaking to ICC, one of the church leaders in the area said, “What is
worrying us (Christians) is why [the Muslim mobs] attack church.”The churches
attacked by the Muslim mobs are: Mombasa Pentecostal Church, Jesus Celebration
Center (the Redeemed Gospel Church), Neno Evangelistic Church, Salvation Army,
and Seventh Day Adventist Church.
Somalia’s Islamic radical group, Al-Shabaab, supported the rioters. Their
message to the Muslims said, “Muslims must take the matter into their own hands,
stand united against the Kuffar (non-believers) and take all necessary measures
to protect their religion, their honor, their property and their lives from the
enemies of Islam."
ICC’s Regional Manager for Africa, Jonathan Racho said, “We are outraged by the
attacks against churches in Mombasa. The Muslim mobs should not be allowed to
destroy churches. We urge Kenya to stop the violence and restore rule of law in
Mombasa.”
Christian Girl Jailed for Blasphemy Determined to be 14 Years Old
Child "Suffering from Trauma" in Pakistani Prison
Washington, D.C. (August 27, 2012) – International Christian Concern (ICC) has
learned that a Christian girl arrested for blasphemy two weeks ago in Pakistan
has been determined a minor according to a recent medical review. The child,
being held in Rawalpindi prison, is reportedly “in a state of shock” and does
not understand the charges brought against her. Muslims from the girl’s village
continue to call for her execution.
Rimsha Masih was accused of blaspheming Islam on August 16 for allegedly burning
pages of the Quran in Mehrabad, a poor district of Islamabad. According to
Rimsha’s lawyer, Tahir Naveed Chaudhary, an official medical review released on
Tuesday determined that the girl is 14 years old, which means she will be tried
in the juvenile court system. Rimsha is being held in Rawalpindi prison. She is
scheduled to appear in court on August 31.
“She was weeping and crying and full of fear,” Chaudhary, who visited Rimsha in
jail on Saturday, told NPR. “My client is not guilty in this case because she
can't judge right and wrong because she's a minor and also she's illiterate.”
Rimsha, who has mental disabilities, reportedly does not understand the reasons
for her imprisonment. “I met the girl at the police station when she was
arrested and she is suffering from trauma,” Xavier P William, the Country
Director of Masihi Foundation Pakistan, told BBC. “The crowd wanted to burn her
alive…. She is an innocent child - she doesn't even know what she did. She is in
a state of shock.”
Following Rimsha’s arrest, a Muslim mob, ranging from 600 – 1,000 people, set
several Christian homes ablaze, causing hundreds of Christians to flee the area.
The mob also called for Rimsha to be burned to death as a blasphemer. “The one
who burned the Koran should be burned,” Shaukhat Ali, an assistant at the local
mosque, told The Washington Post.
Echoing Ali’s sentiments, Hafiz Mohammed Khalid Chishti, an imam in Mehrabad,
told worshippers during Friday prayers that it was “time for Muslims to wake up”
and protect the Quran. “The girl who burnt the Koran has no mental illness and
is a normal girl,” Chishti told Agence France-Presse. “She did it knowingly;
this is a conspiracy and not a mistake…. [Christians] committed this crime to
insult us further. This happened because we did not stop their anti-Islam
activities before.”
The case has stirred international outcry over Pakistan’s oppressive blasphemy
laws, which are sometimes used to settle personal vendettas or to seek
retribution. Many religious minorities in Pakistan, including Christians, live
in fear of being accused of blasphemy.
Aidan Clay, ICC Regional Manager for the Middle East, said, “Now that Rimsha has
been labeled a blasphemer, she will never be able to return home. In the past 25
years, more than 46 people accused of blasphemy have been murdered on the
streets, in court rooms, or in prison cells. It is likely that Rimsha will also
face vigilante justice by outraged Pakistani Muslims, even if she is never
convicted. We urge Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari to secure the release
of this innocent young girl, to ensure that she is reunited with her family, and
to provide a safe place for her to live. Pakistani officials must take action
immediately to ensure that Rimsha does not become a victim of mob violence or
another casualty of abused blasphemy legislation. No one, adult or child, should
fear being executed by their government or burned by a mob simply because they
are a member of a minority religious community.”
Fresh Concerns about Health of Saudi King
Simon Henderson /Washington Institute
August 27, 2012
Saudi Arabia's aging leadership is in transition, potentially hindering
Washington's policies on Syria and Iran.
This morning, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia left the country for an undisclosed
destination after deputizing Crown Prince Salman to take over his
responsibilities in his absence. The reason for the trip has not been revealed,
but there is widespread speculation that the eighty-eight-year-old king will
head to New York City for medical treatment, perhaps after a brief stop in
Morocco. He had operations for a back complaint in 2010 and 2011, and he was
almost bent double while standing during an Islamic summit in Mecca two weeks
ago. Photographs showed him in obvious discomfort as he left the kingdom today.
Despite the lack of information about the trip, now is a good time to examine
Saudi Arabia's regional role and relationship with the United States. The Obama
administration sees King Abdullah as a crucial ally in several fields. In Syria,
Riyadh is providing arms to the anti-Assad rebels. In the oil market, it has
expanded production to offset the drop in Iranian exports caused by nuclear
sanctions. Although Riyadh was reportedly disappointed with Washington's swift
removal of support for longtime ally Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, the kingdom appears
to share many policy objectives with the United States. Washington undoubtedly
views Saudi leadership of the Arab and Muslim worlds as useful, not to mention
its role as a major oil supplier.
Having Crown Prince Salman stand in for the monarch is no particular relief.
Although he serves as defense minister and is, at seventy-six, significantly
younger than Abdullah, some have expressed concerns about his own health and his
ability to focus on detail. An additional worry is that the House of Saud has no
obvious crown-prince-in-waiting behind him. The need for such a candidate has
become more urgent in the past year given the deaths of no fewer than two crown
princes, Sultan and Nayef, who were half-brothers of Abdullah and full brothers
of Salman, yet died within eight months of each other.
Saudi foreign policy capacity is already strained due to the ill health of
longtime foreign minister Prince Saud al-Faisal. In his absence, the kingdom is
being represented at this week's Non-Aligned Movement summit in Tehran by the
king's son and deputy foreign minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Abdullah. It is
unclear to what extent Prince Bandar bin Sultan's recent appointment as
intelligence chief has boosted Saudi capabilities.
Meanwhile, the continuing threat of al-Qaeda terrorism in the kingdom became
apparent this weekend with the announcement of arrests targeting terrorist cells
in Riyadh and Jeddah. The suspects were mainly from Yemen, but the cell leaders
were said to be Saudi. Police displayed a considerable amount of seized
explosives for the press. The discovery of the cells, which were said to be
targeting "security men, citizens, foreign residents, and public facilities,"
can probably be credited to Prince Muhammad bin Nayef, the assistant interior
minister for counterterrorism. He is reportedly very capable but has yet to be
promoted to the vacant position of deputy interior minister, in part due to
apparently intense competition for promotion among the sons of the current
generation of leaders. The deputy interior position remains open after its
previous incumbent, Prince Ahmed, was made interior minister after the death of
Prince Nayef, who held that post while serving as crown prince.
Saudi help for Washington in terms of oil policy is another issue demanding
attention. Although the kingdom has increased production to its highest level in
many years, global prices remain stubbornly high, apparently because of Riyadh's
preference to store extra volumes rather than put them on the market.
The short-term challenge is to work out who is the main point of contact: King
Abdullah or Crown Prince Salman. In the longer term, Washington must ensure that
it develops a good working relationship with whoever might emerge as a future
crown prince -- and one day, probably sooner than later, as a future king.
**Simon Henderson, the Baker fellow and director of the Gulf and Energy Policy
Program at The Washington Institute, is author of After King Abdullah:
Succession in Saudi Arabia.
Iran Struggles Unsuccessfully for Influence in Central Asia
Nikolay Kozhanov /Washington Institute
August 28, 2012
On the sidelines of the Non-Aligned Movement summit in Tehran, Iranian officials
will consult with Central Asian republics in another failed attempt to
strengthen the Islamic Republic's position and counter what they see as
dangerous U.S. influence in the region.
In recent months, Tehran's diplomatic efforts in Central Asia have far surpassed
their traditional level. Iranian officials have met with representatives of the
region's ex-Soviet republics on numerous occasions, including on the sidelines
of the June 6 Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, at several events
organized by the Tehran-influenced Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), at
bilateral trade commission meetings with Kazakhstan (June) and Turkmenistan
(July 15), through exchanges of delegations, and in other multilateral and
bilateral forums. Yet the actual impact of this flurry of activity is
questionable.
FEARS OF GREATER U.S. INFLUENCE
A major reason for Tehran's intensified diplomacy in the region is Washington's
planned military withdrawal from Afghanistan. Iran's ruling elites are
practically unanimous in their belief that the announced departure is nothing
but a cover for a strategic regrouping. According to this view, the United
States may decide to not only remain in Afghanistan, but also increase its
military presence in other Central Asian countries. Tehran's apprehensions
became stronger in June-July, when Central Asian and Russian media sources began
spreading rumors about U.S. assistance to the Tajikistan government in
suppressing local insurgents, and about possible rapprochement between
Washington and Uzbekistan.
Iran is also frustrated by its complete exclusion from recent U.S. plans for
Afghanistan's regional economic integration. Tehran is especially concerned
about Western attempts to position Afghanistan as an alternative land route
connecting Pakistan and India with markets in Central Asia, Russia, and China.
Although an Afghan transport corridor hardly seems feasible in the near to mid
term, the mere idea already appears to have frightened Tehran.
In addition, Russia's regional position has been seriously weakened in 2012 -- a
trend that Tehran regards as problematic given its longstanding view of Moscow
as part of an anti-American front in Central Asia. On June 28, for example,
Uzbekistan suspended its membership in the Moscow-backed Collective Security
Treaty Organization (CSTO), the military backbone of the future "Eurasian Union"
that Russian president Vladimir Putin reputedly hopes to forge among the former
Soviet republics that comprise the Commonwealth of Independent States. And in
July, Tajikistan -- another CSTO member -- offered initially unacceptable
conditions for prolonging the presence of the 201st Russian military base on its
soil, putting the future of Moscow's troop presence in the country into
question. Russian relations with Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan have also been
tense. Tehran is worried that this decrease in Moscow's influence in Central
Asia will strengthen Washington's position there; accordingly, it has sought to
increase its own presence in the region.
Tehran is also concerned by what it sees as Turkey's growing influence in
Central Asia. For example, the region has become an important market for Turkish
goods: in 2011, Turkish trade with Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan totaled $6.8 billion, more than 50 percent higher
than Iran's $4.1 billion in trade with the same countries.
TEHRAN OFFERS CARROTS
Under these circumstances, Tehran hopes that active dialogue with the Central
Asian republics can persuade them that friendship with Iran is more profitable
than confrontation. The methods of persuasion have been gentle thus far: Tehran
has offered numerous carrots, but no sticks.
In mid-July, for example, Turkmenistan agreed to increase its future gas and
electricity exports to the Islamic Republic. And in June, Tehran reached a
number of important economic agreements with Kazakhstan, including plans to
finish construction of the Uzen-Etrek-Gorgan railroad connecting Kazakhstan,
Turkmenistan, and Iran by 2013. Then, in late July, Kyrgyzstan received a
preliminary offer to join the Iran-Afghanistan-Tajikistan-China railroad
project, with Tehran expressing its readiness to finance Bishkek's portion of
the construction.
Tajikistan has received even greater Iranian attention this year. In March,
Tehran agreed to take part in the construction of a highway connecting the
Islamic Republic with Afghanistan and Tajikistan. And during a May 27-28 meeting
of the Iranian-Tajik economic commission, the two countries reached preliminary
agreements on the construction of joint oil, gas, and water pipelines. They also
discussed exports of Tajik electricity to Iran as well as Iranian participation
in the construction of an oil refinery in Tajikistan. And in June, Tehran
decided to increase its investment in the construction of the Tajik
hydroelectric plant Sangtuda-2.
More broadly, Iran spares no effort to prove its importance as a regional
transport hub, which it regards as essential to securing both economic and
geostrategic gains. Toward that end, Tehran actively promotes so-called "ECO
Container Trains" on the Islamabad-Tehran-Istanbul, Istanbul-Tehran-Tashkent-Almaty,
and Bandar Abbas-Almaty rail routes. Over the past two years, Iran has also
sought to improve passenger and cargo capacities at its border terminals with
Turkey, Iraq, Turkmenistan, and Afghanistan.
IMPLICATIONS: NOT MUCH
Iran will continue to consult with Central Asian states on many issues -- in
particular, border security, stabilization in Afghanistan, transport access to
the Russian and Chinese markets, and the development of regional energy markets
will likely be the main drivers of Tehran's diplomacy in the region in the near
term. Tehran will also use its contacts with these states to convince the
Iranian people that U.S. attempts to isolate the Islamic Republic are futile.
In the end, though, these efforts are unlikely to substantially change current
trends in post-Soviet Central Asia. Tehran's ability to influence the regional
situation is severely limited. Although this situation is partly a result of
Iran's sanctions-related economic troubles and desire to avoid open tensions
with certain nonregional players (e.g., Russia and Turkey), it is also a
function of foreign policy shifts exhibited by Central Asian governments
themselves. As some analysts have pointed out, these countries have undergone
drastic changes in self-perception over the past decade -- no longer do they see
themselves as living in a landlocked, isolated region whose relations with the
external world depend completely on Russia or Iran. The growing U.S., Chinese,
Turkish, and Arab presence there has given them a sense of self-importance and a
much wider choice of partners and opportunities, among which Iran does not seem
that appealing.
*Nikolay Kozhanov is an expert at the Institute of the Middle East in Moscow.
Is Iran a part of the solution in Syria?
By Tariq Alhomayed/Asharq Al-Awsat
Egypt has put forward a proposal for the formation of a quadripartite committee
comprising of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran to deal with the Syrian
crisis. Cairo justified extending an invitation to Tehran by saying that Iran
can be part of the solution, and the question here is: How can Iran be part of
the solution in Syria? If the Iranian Revolutionary Guard is vowing to protect
al-Assad from his defenseless people, then how can Iran be part of the solution
in Syria, at a time when Alaeddin Boroujerdi - head of Iran’s parliamentary
committee on national security and foreign policy - speaking from Damascus after
meeting with al-Assad, says that “Syria’s security is Iran’s security”? How can
Egypt propose to invite Iran when Boroujerdi himself says the main reason for
what Syria is witnessing is that America and Israel have lost their main base in
the Middle East, namely Egypt, after the fall of former President Mubarak? How
could Saudi Arabia or the other members of the Islamic tripartite cooperate with
Iran over Syria, whilst Tehran says that freezing Syria’s membership in the
Organization of Islamic Cooperation – a decision that was unanimously approved
in Iran’s attendance at the recent summit in Mecca – is an “emotional move”?
Indeed this is unbelievable, and cannot be explained! Iran is part of the
problem in Syria, offering the Damascus criminal all kinds of support, whether
money or weaponry, to suppress the Syrian revolution, so how, after all that,
can we say to Tehran: Go ahead, be part of the solution in Syria? How could we
criticize President Obama for pulling out of Iraq and handing it over to Iran
when we seem to be doing the same thing in Syria today?
The strange thing about this invitation for Iran to be part of the solution in
Syria is that it comes after the failure of former UN-Arab League envoy Kofi
Annan’s attempt to involve Iran in the Syrian issue, a move that was rejected by
the US and Europe, and likewise by the Arabs, so how can Iran be invited to
participate once again, this time from post-revolution Egypt? Did any Arab or
regional states intervene in Egypt’s revolution for the sake of the former
regime?! Does post-revolution Egypt want to marginalize the rest of the Arab
states today in favor of Iran? Inviting Tehran to be “part of the solution in
Syria” means that there are those among us who want to see “Lebanonization” in
Syria and this is unacceptable and cannot be tolerated. In all simplicity this
means resorting to half measures and this is one of the most prominent problems
in our region. It is also caving into Iranian blackmail, especially as we hear
Nawaf al-Moussawi, MP for the Hezbollah-affiliated “Loyalty to the Resistance”
bloc in the Lebanese parliament, saying that events in Syria will only end
through a settlement or an open civil war, and there will be no winners and
losers in Syria!
Syria is not Lebanon or Iraq and should not have a sectarian quota system; the
Syrian composition does not allow for this. As Arabs we must not do this; we
must stand by the Syrian people and preserve the unity of Syria and its
independence, rather than sell it or divide it. This is what the Arabs should
remember, and specifically those who were preoccupied at length in the past
talking about “Sykes-Picot”, but who today want Syria to be divided for the
benefit of Iran!
Morsi visit spells cautious Iran-Egypt shift
August 28, 2012/Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, by visiting Iran this week,
aims to distance himself from three decades of chilly ties and cautiously pursue
a more agile diplomacy than his predecessor Hosni Mubarak. Egypt's first
Islamist and freely elected president is headed for Tehran to hand over the
rotating leadership of the Non-Aligned Movement at a summit on Thursday and
Friday.
The visit will last a "few hours," his spokesperson Yassir Ali said, and only
summit-related issues will be raised.
"No other topic is expected," he said, ruling out discussions on a resumption of
diplomatic relations with Iran, severed after the 1979 Islamic revolution which
installed a theocracy opposed to Egypt's peace treaty with Israel. Iranian
Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said last week he hoped the two countries
would resume diplomatic ties, currently at the level of low-key interest
sections in each other's country.
"Morsi's visit will give a big push towards normalization [of] Egyptian-Iranian
relations", said Elsayed Amin Shalby, director of the Egyptian Council for
Foreign Affairs think-tank.
But "a four-hour visit can't make a breakthrough," he added.
A distinct warming in ties with Tehran would anger the United States, which has
been pushing to isolate and sanction the Islamic republic over its controversial
nuclear program.
It would also antagonize Sunni monarchies in the Gulf that accuse Iran of trying
to destabilize their oil-rich region, and on which Egypt partially relies for
aid to revive its battered economy after its 2011 uprising. Morsi himself hails
from the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni movement which has had an ambivalent stance
towards Shiite Iran.
Mubarak, who ruled for three decades before his overthrow in February 2011,
positioned himself alongside the United States and other countries hostile to
Iran's influence, which extends to the Hamas rulers of Gaza in Egypt's back
yard.
Before its downfall, Mubarak's government even accused Tehran of trying to
destabilize his regime, which gave way after the uprising to military rule and
then Morsi's election last June.
Morsi appears set on taking a different tack, while sending reassuring messages
to the Gulf states. His first foreign visit after his election was to Saudi
Arabia, Iran's main rival in the region.
Egypt's diplomatic line will be "more agile and active," leaving behind the
"stagnation" under Mubarak's rule, Morsi's spokesperson Ali said before the
president left for China en route to Iran.
"We are not in competition with any country," he said.
The conflict in Syria, where US- and Gulf-backed rebels are trying to unseat
President Bashar al-Assad, Iran's closest regional ally, has given Morsi an
opportunity to reach out to Tehran.
Tehran has welcomed his proposal of a regional committee to find a solution to
the Syrian crisis including Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, although Morsi
himself has called for Assad to step down.
"If this group succeeds, Iran would be part of the solution and not the
problem," Ali said.
-AFP