LCCC
ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
April 09/2012
Bible Quotation for today/
Jesus Is Taken Up to Heaven
Mark 16/12-20: " After this,
Jesus appeared in a different manner to two of them while they were on their way
to the country. They returned and told the others, but these would not believe
it.
Jesus Appears to the Eleven Last of all, Jesus appeared to the eleven disciples
as they were eating. He scolded them, because they did not have faith and
because they were too stubborn to believe those who had seen him alive. He said
to them, Go throughout the whole world and preach the gospel to all people.
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; whoever does not believe will be
condemned. Believers will be given the power to perform miracles: they will
drive out demons in my name; they will speak in strange tongues; if they pick up
snakes or drink any poison, they will not be harmed; they will place their hands
on sick people, and these will get well. After the Lord Jesus had talked with
them, he was taken up to heaven and sat at the right side of God. The disciples
went and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and proved that
their preaching was true by the miracles that were performed.
Latest
analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous
sources
Interview with Assad's former university Professor Mousa
al-Kurdi: Al-Assad has become a “monster/April
08/12
If Islam is the solution then the Muslim Brotherhood is
the problem/By Yousef Al-Dayni/Asharq Alawsat/April
08/12
Syrian disinformation about Christian persecution/by
Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi, Oskar Svadkovsky and Phillip Smyth/April
08/12
Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for April 08/12
Deadly Bomb Blast Rocks Area near Church in Northern
Nigeria
Pope Benedict to visit Lebanon Sept. 14: Rai
Al-Rahi Confirms Pope’s Sept. Visit: We’re Cooperating
with Suleiman to Ensure Lebanon’s Neutrality
Pope marks Easter with
call for Syria violence end
Pope, in Easter message, backs Syria peace plan
Special IDF units prepare for next Lebanon war – and legal
fallout
Report: U.S. operated inside Iran to collect information
on nuclear program
Israel official: Iran official's comments prove existence
of military nuclear program
Israel signals willingness to accept Western plans for
next round of Iran nuclear talks
Egyptians cooperating with Israel to fight Sinai terror
Palestinian militants fire two rockets from Gaza into
Israel
Geagea says
assassination attempt will not deter LF resolve
Report: Geagea Murder Attempt Marks Beginning of Wave of
Security Unrest in Lebanon
Lebanon's Arabic press digest - April 8, 2012 The Daily
Star
Unknown individuals set fire to Tyre shop
Monti praises Lebanon dissociation policy toward Syria
Sleiman says 1960
elections law undesirable
Higher Islamic Council urges Arabs to save Syrian lives
Jumblatt backs down on proportional representation
Hariri denies report father's residence was sold
Report: Hizbullah Seeking to Improve Aoun’s Ties with
Jumblat ahead of 2013 Elections
Report: Majority in Lebanon Believes Proportional
Electoral Law Will Not Be Approved at Parliament
Mansour heads to Libya to follow up on Sadr case
Israel finds dud rocket near Eilat: military
U.S. to demand Iran immediately close Fordo nuclear
facility
Syria wants guarantees to pull troops from cities
Syria suggests it might not pull forces by deadline
Three days before cease-fire comes into force, Syrian army
kills dozens
Syria wants 'written guarantees' from opposition
Egyptian court stops opposition figure from presidential
run
Egypt's former spy chief joins presidential race
Iraq: Video appears to show top Saddam deputy
Turkey warns of 'steps' if Syria mayhem doesn't end
Israel calls on Iran to give up enriched uranium
U.S. drone strike kills 8 Qaeda suspects in Yemen
Deadly Bomb Blast Rocks Area near Church in Northern Nigeria
Naharnet/ 08 April 2012/A large bomb exploded near a church in the northern
Nigerian city of Kaduna as Easter Sunday services were being held, killing at
least two people, residents and police said.
Residents suggested the explosion, which left at least 10 hurt, was caused by a
car bomb parked outside the church, in a stark reminder of Christmas Day attacks
in Nigeria that left dozens dead.A spokesman for the national emergency
management agency said most of the victims appeared to be motorcycle taxi
drivers who were in the area at the time.
Police confirmed the explosion was a bomb, but did not comment further. "We have
a bomb explosion. We are trying to sort things out," police spokesman Aminu
Lawal told AFP.Residents reported seeing dead and injured being taken away. One
resident said he saw at least two dead bodies. "While we were there, two dead
bodies were brought out and loaded onto a waiting van along with 10 injured, but
while the recovery and rescue operation was going on we were chased away by
soldiers and policemen who cordoned off the area," he said. Another resident
said that "from my balcony, I could see policemen loading the dead and the
injured into waiting vans." One resident said the explosion was strong enough to
shake his house and cause his ceiling to cave in. He ran to the site, which had
already been cordoned off, but he said he could see damage to the Assemblies of
God Church and cars. Islamist group Boko Haram carried out a series of attacks
on churches and other locations on Christmas Day. The worst of those attacks
occurred at a church outside the capital Abuja, where 44 people died.
Authorities as well as foreign embassies had warned of the possibility of an
attack on Easter Sunday.
The Islamist group's increasingly bloody insurgency has left more than 1,000
people dead since mid-2009. Police and soldiers have often been the victims of
such attacks, though Christians have occasionally been targeted as well. The
group also claimed responsibility for the August suicide bombing of U.N.
headquarters in Abuja which killed 25 people. Its deadliest attack yet occurred
in the northern city of Kano on January 20, when coordinated bombings and
shootings left at least 185 people dead. Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation
and largest oil producer, is roughly divided between a mainly Muslim north and
predominately Christian south.Kaduna is a major cultural and economic center in
Nigeria's north.SourceAgence France Presse.
Pope, in Easter message, backs Syria peace plan
By Philip Pullella/VATICAN CITY | Sun Apr 8, 2012
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - A fatigued-looking Pope Benedict threw his weight
behind a United Nations plan to end bloodshed in Syria in his Easter Sunday
message, calling for "an immediate commitment" to peace efforts there. The
84-year-old pope gave a shorter-than-usual blessing from the central balcony of
St Peter's Basilica after an outdoor Easter Mass attended by more than 100,000
people in a St Peter's Square bedecked with yellow and white flowers. "May the
risen Christ grant hope to the Middle East and enable all the ethnic, cultural
and religious groups in that region to work together to advance the common good
and respect for human rights," he said.
"Particularly in Syria, may there be an end to bloodshed and an immediate
commitment to the path of respect, dialogue and reconciliation, as called for by
the international community," he said, speaking to a festive crowd packed into
the square and surrounding streets. There was no official explanation why his
twice yearly "Urbi et Orbi" (to the city and the world) speech was shorter than
in previous years but the pope, who turns 85 on April 16 and has appeared frail
recently, looked drawn and tired at Sunday's Mass. Easter Sunday, the most
important day in the Christian liturgical calendar, capped an intense period of
recent activity for the pope, including a grueling trip to Mexico and Cuba late
last month and five religious services this past week.
As the pope spoke in Rome, Syrian troops pounded opposition areas, activists
said, killing 74 civilians in an offensive that has sent thousands of refugees
surging into Turkey before next week's U.N.-backed ceasefire aimed at staunching
a year of bloodshed. A peace plan formulated by U.N-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan
calls for a truce to take effect early on Thursday if government forces begin
pulling back from towns 48 hours earlier. Both sides have accused the other of
intensifying assaults in the run-up to the truce. The pope also made an appeal
on behalf of civilians fleeing the Syrian conflict, most by fleeing to
Turkey."May the many refugees from that country who are in need of humanitarian
assistance find the acceptance and solidarity capable of relieving their
dreadful sufferings," he said.
CONDEMNS ANTI-CHRISTIAN "TERRORISM" IN NIGERIA
He also called for "stability and development" in Iraq, urged Israelis and
Palestinians to "courageously take up anew the peace process," and condemned
recent "savage terrorist attacks" against Christian churches in Nigeria. While
the Mass was in progress, the Vatican announced that the pope will visit Lebanon
on September 14-16 to deliver the results of a Vatican synod of bishops on the
Middle East in 2010. At the end of his Easter message, Benedict wished the world
a Happy Easter in 65 languages, including Arabic, Hebrew and other languages
spoken in the areas in mentioned in his peace appeals
Benedict started Easter celebrations on Saturday night when, at a solemn vigil
Mass in St Peter's Basilica, he said technological progress, in the absence of
awareness of God and moral values, posed a threat to the world."The darkness
that poses a real threat to mankind, after all, is the fact that he can see and
investigate tangible material things, but cannot see where the world is going or
whence it comes, where our own life is going, what is good and what is evil," he
said..
Pope Benedict to visit Lebanon Sept. 14: Rai April 08, 2012/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai announced Sunday that Catholic Pope
Benedict XVI would tour Lebanon on an official visit starting Sept. 14. Rai’s
announcement came during an Easter Sunday Mass held at Bkirki. The head of the
Maronite Church said Pope Benedict’s visit would be between Sept. 14 and Sept.
16 and that he would meet top officials, including President Michel Sleiman. A
statement from Sleiman's office said the visit would affirm the depth of the
“historical relations that tie Lebanon with the [Vatican] and will form an
occasion to focus on Lebanon's position, message and role as a witness of
freedom and coexistence."
Report: U.S. operated inside Iran to collect information on
nuclear program
By Haaretz/Washington Post reports that CIA has collected intelligence on Iran
for past three years, which boosts U.S. confidence during upcoming Iran
talks.The CIA has been operating stealth surveillance drones deep inside Iran
for the last three years, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The drones
were operating freely above hundreds of suspicious facilities, before the
aircraft, named the RQ-170 Sentinel, crashed within Iran in December. According
to U.S. officials, the drones, that have been scouring dozens of sites
throughout Iran, have given the Obama administration confidence that the U.S.
will see any activity that would indicate Tehran decided to assemble a nuclear
bomb. “There is confidence that we would see activity indicating that a decision
had been made,” a senior U.S. official was quoted as saying by the Washington
Post. “Across the board, our access has been significantly improved.” The Obama
administration believes that the improved intelligence gathered through these
covert operations will strengthen its bargaining power in the upcoming nuclear
talks with Iran. According to the report, the surveillance of Iran's nuclear
program has been gaining momentum since the last years of the Bush
administration. This included increased eavesdropping by the National Security
Agency, the establishment of an Iran task force, and an expanded network of
spies. Recently, the Obama administration has cited new intelligence reports to
argue against an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, however, have
been arguing that Iran is nearing the final steps toward developing a nuclear
bomb and have been pushing for a more aggressive approach.
Special IDF units prepare for next Lebanon war – and legal fallout
By Gili Cohen/Haaretz /Ground forces are expected to contribute much more than
in 2006, when Israel relied mainly on the IAF, which would entail much more
intense urban warfare.Almost six years after the Second Lebanon War, special
Israeli units are preparing to take part in mass incursions into Lebanon if
another round of fighting with Hezbollah breaks out. Just as important, they are
being trained to heed the legal implications. Officers say the Israel Air Force
would destroy targets like training bases and rocket-launching pads within a few
days, based on the intelligence gathered by the Israel Defense Forces. But this
would not be enough, so a ground offensive would be necessary. "When you stick
an [Israeli] flag [on enemy territory], there's no question who won," says a
high-ranking officer who requested anonymity. "You need to seize a geographic
space. This is the only way the concept of victory can be established."
The IDF has been trying to improve its performance if hostilities resume, but so
has Hezbollah. The Shi'ite organization has built fortified lines with
underground command posts and improved operational capacity. Its rockets are
hidden in better-camouflaged launching pads. The ground forces are therefore
expected to contribute much more to the war effort than in 2006, when Israel
relied mainly on the IAF. This would entail much more intense urban warfare,
with many civilians caught in the crossfire, and the attendant legal
implications.
"Everything that we've seen with the flotillas, Operation Cast Lead and the
implications in terms of international law have left a strong impression on us,"
says Lt. Col. Sahar Abergil, commander of the special elite unit Yahalom. That
unit specializes in bunker warfare and is likely to carry much of the military
burden.
"I hope we'll take [international law] into account during the fighting,"
Abergil says. Yahalom soldiers, along with the men and dogs of the IDF's Oketz
canine unit, finished a long training session last week.
"It's not patrols or raids on Palestinians we're simulating here, but a
full-fledged war," says Oketz's commander, who gave his name as Sivan.
One of Oketz's main tasks is to distinguish between militants and uninvolved
civilians. "Our dogs know how to spare civilians and home in on terrorists,"
says Sivan, a captain. "How do they? That's our secret." When closing in on a
house where the enemy is thought to be hiding, the soldiers must order everyone
to exit. Those who don't come out are considered suspects, and the dogs soon get
an order to attack. According to Abergil, "Our goal is that the dogs won't take
on civilians. "That's why we include pretend civilians in our drills, to show
the soldiers that there are no hard-and-fast rules."
He says the soldiers also discuss moral dilemmas that may have legal
ramifications. For example, they are expected to cope if a woman wearing a coat
and a little boy approach their post.
"Do they open fire? Do they shout? Do they wound them? Our soldiers understand
that it might be a terrorist cynically exploiting a 5-year-old boy, and they're
supposed to try to find indications," says Abergil. "Could she be deaf? Or maybe
blind and she's being led by the boy? The army's encounter with a civilian
population is never simple, and there's no way to master it fully. We're trying
to instruct the soldiers to use their discretion and common sense. At the end of
the day, this is war."
Israel calls on Iran to give up enriched uranium April 08, 2012/Daily Star
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM: Israel's defense minister is calling on Iran to give up its
stockpile of enriched uranium ahead of a new round of international talks over
its disputed nuclear program.Ehud Barak told CNN on Sunday that Iran should ship
all of its uranium enriched at the 20 percent level to a "trusted" neighboring
country. He also says the international community should demand that Iran no
longer enrich uranium to that level.The five permanent members of the U.N.
Security Council, along with Germany, are to begin talks Friday with Iran. The
international community, including Israel, suspects Iran of trying to develop
nuclear weapons. Enriched uranium is a key ingredient in bomb making, though
enrichment would have to be much higher for a weapon. Iran says its nuclear
activities are peaceful.
Report: Geagea Murder Attempt Marks Beginning of Wave of Security Unrest in
Lebanon
Naharnet/08 April 2012/The security situation in Lebanon is “fragile” and any
security incident may lead to internal unrest, reported Al-Seyassah Kuwaiti
newspaper on Sunday.A centrist ministerial source told the daily: “Unrest will
erupt in more than one region, especially in areas of mixed political presence
in order to avoid blame being directed against a certain camp.” It added that
“saboteurs” have been deployed in areas that are controlled by the March 14
camp. “The unrest is aimed at destabilizing Lebanon through assassinating an
influential opposition figure and damaging the country’s tourist season,” it
revealed. On Wednesday, Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea was the target of a
failed assassination attempt at his Maarab residence. The source predicted that
security incidents will take place “very soon, because all the signs indicate
that the situation has reached a dangerous phase given the escalation of the
crisis in Syria.”It explained that Syrian regime is keen ending the popular
uprising against it and it may therefore seek to shift attention from its
crackdown by creating strife elsewhere, such as Lebanon.Mustaqbal bloc MP Ahmed
Fatfat told the daily that “everything is possible” after Geagea’s assassination
attempt, adding: “It seems that we have entered a new phase in Lebanon and
everything is possible for the criminal mind that does not heed the consequences
of its actions.”
Geagea says assassination attempt will not deter LF resolve
April 08, 2012/ The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea said over the weekend the recent
attempt on his life would not deter his party from its mission or message.
“Everything that has happened does not frighten us and will not delay us,” said
Geagea, who spoke in a televised speech at a ceremony organized by his party in
Zahle, east Lebanon, Saturday. “The criminals should know that their attempt [to
assassinate the LF chief] will not deter us from our resolve,” he added. Geagea
said Wednesday he had escaped an assassination attempt when a sniper fired at
his residence in Maarab in Kesrouan, warning that the political assassinations
of the last decade had not ended. The LF leader said the attempt involved a high
level of expertise, claiming the shots had been fired at least 1 kilometer from
the target site.
Investigations into the incident are ongoing. On Saturday, hundreds of Lebanese
Army personnel combed hills northwest of Maarab, the Kesrouan headquarters of
the LF and the residence of Geagea, as part of investigations to identify the
perpetrators of attempted assassination. While reactions to the news of the
incident has drawn wide criticism both locally and internationally, the March 8
coalition reaction has remained, for the most part, muted or outright skeptical.
Without referring to the incident, Hezbollah MP Mohammad Raad said Saturday
“some want to exaggerate some issues or aggravate some of the events in order to
turn attention away from the interests of the country.” Raad’s comments drew a
swift response from MP Strida Geagea, who said the attempt on her husband’s wife
was not to be taken lightly.“The stances by the president, prime minister, to
the clear position of the interior minister and the serious attention [on the
matter] by the heads of the army and the general director of the interior
ministry and by judicial and security apparatuses, all these [positions] point
clearly to the seriousness of the attack and in itself acts a devastating
response to Raad’s comments,” the female lawmaker said Saturday.
Al-Rahi Confirms Pope’s Sept. Visit: We’re Cooperating with Suleiman to Ensure
Lebanon’s Neutrality
Naharnet /Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi stressed on Sunday the need to
distance Lebanon from regional axes. He said during Easter sermon: “We are
cooperating with President Michel Suleiman to ensure Lebanon’s neutrality so
that it remains an oasis of peace, justice, and dialogue between cultures.”
“These efforts should also enable Lebanon to act as a bridge between East and
West,” he added.
“Suleiman is trying to break down the divisions between the Lebanese factions
and instill an atmosphere of cooperation among them,” he said. “Lebanon’s value
lies in its cultural and religious diversity, which is at the heart of
democracy,” declared the patriarch. In addition, al-Rahi confirmed before the
congregation Pope Benedict XVI’s visit to Lebanon, which will take place between
September 14 and 16.
The pontiff is expected to hold talks during his trip with Suleiman and a number
of political and civil authorities.
Sleiman says 1960 elections law undesirable
April 08, 2012/The Daily Star /BEIRUT: President Michel Sleiman said Sunday he
hoped the country would not adopt the election law of 1960 and condemned the
recent attempted assassination of Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. “We live
in a democracy and I hope we do not return to the election law of 1960 given
that all the parties have highlighted the inadequacy of the 1960 law in today’s
age,” Sleiman told reporters after a meeting with Patriarch Beshara Rai at
Bkirki. Sleiman backs a draft electoral law based on proportional representation
authored by Interior Minister Marwan Charbel, while Progressive Socialist Party
head Walid Jumblatt, who has a share in the Lebanese government, leans toward
the current winner-take-all system, an amended version of the pre-Civil War 1960
legislation. The 1960 version, used in the 2009 polls, adopts the administrative
unit of the qada as the so-called “small” electoral district, while the Taif
Accord stipulates the larger governorate as the electoral constituency.
Splitting the difference is Charbel’s draft, which can be termed as relying on
medium-sized districts. Sleiman said he would follow up on discussions of the
draft proportional representation law and said the government “was open to all
democratic discussions on this matter.”
The president, who later attended an Easter Mass at Bkirki, also told reporters
that he had discussed with Rai the recent attempted assassination of Lebanese
Forces leader Samir Geagea and condemned the attack. “We brought up this subject
and this act is strongly condemned,” he said, expressing hope that
investigations into the case would bring to justice those behind the Wednesday
attack.
Geagea said Wednesday he had escaped an assassination attempt when a sniper
fired at his residence in Maarab in Kesrouan, warning that the political
assassinations of the last decade had not ended.
Sleiman said Sunday he would maintain stability in the country. “We will not
allow Lebanon to be turned into an area where these acts are permitted and that
internal stability and peace be shaken,” he said.
Sleiman said stability in the country, “particularly this year,” could be traced
to the Taif Accord, “which provided a safety net over all the Lebanese regions
and set a balance between political elements of society.”Sleiman’s comments came
ahead of an Easter Mass headed by Rai, who said he would work with the
president, away from all forms of division.
“We, as a Church, will work with you, Mr. president, with all good will for the
unity of the Lebanese people in all its sects and elements, away from all
divisions and enmity,” Rai said during the Mass.
Rai also said he would work with Sleiman to prevent Lebanon being drawn into
regional and international alignment, “whether at the political, religious or
sectarian level.”
Lebanon's Arabic press digest - April 8, 2012 The Daily Star
Following are summaries of some of the main stories in a selection of Lebanese
and pan-Arab newspapers Sunday. The Daily Star cannot vouch for the accuracy of
these reports.
Al-Mustaqbal
Hezbollah says issue of Geagea exaggerated and Strida rejects making light of
the issue
While there was a noticeable increase in the number of massacres committed by
the Baath regime in Syria, a dangerous development, the “border” massacre, took
place at Jouesiyeh which is controlled by Syrian General Security near Lebanon’s
Masharih al-Qaa. A rocket-propelled grenade struck two Lebanese buses which led
to the killing of six Syrians, one Lebanese and wounded at least 21 more.
In the meantime, and in the aftermath of the attempted assassination of Lebanese
Forces leader Dr. Samir Geagea, there have been no breakthroughs in the
investigation and it appears clear that the probe has been hampered by Telecoms
Minister Nicholas Sehnaoui holding on to the telecoms “data” from investigators.
A security sources said “the Telecoms Ministry not providing security agencies
the “data” is hindering their work.”
The case of the assassination attempt was followed up by President Michel
Sleiman, Justice Minister Shakib Qortbawi, General Prosecutor Saeed Mirza and
judges Claude Karam and Hatem Madi.
While March 14 coalition officials slammed the refusal to hand over the telecoms
“data,” the head of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc, MP Mohammad Raad,
considered that “some want to exaggerate some issues or aggravate some of the
events in order to turn attention away from the interests of the country.”
Raad’s comments provoked a response from LF MP Strida Geagea, who rejected
“making light of the attempted assassination of Dr. Samir Geagea,” noting the
statements by the prime minister and the president on “the clear stance of the
interior minister and the serious attention [on the matter] by the heads of the
army and the general-director of the Internal Security Forces, and that judicial
and security apparatuses all stress the seriousness of the assault, which
constitutes a devastating response to MP Raad’s comments.”
Al-Hayat
Hezbollah seeks cooperation between Jumblatt and Aoun
A prominent political source in the majority told Al-Hayat that there was a
general conviction that the adoption of proportional representation in the 2013
elections is impossible given the difficulty of securing a majority, whether in
Cabinet or Parliament, and that it would not pass in Parliament if those wanting
it managed to pass in government, despite doubts as a result of the outright
rejection on the matter by one of the principle poles that includes the head of
the National Struggle Front parliamentary bloc MP Walid Jumblatt. The source
said this conviction on the difficulty of adoption proportional representation
comes after most parties suggested a return to the 1960 elections law ... with
the amendments to which were agreed upon as part of the Doha Accord between the
March 8 and March 14 coalitions. The source said Hezbollah has begun looking
into the political and elections maps that will dictate the 2013 polls on the
basis of the 1960 election law, which some have dubbed as the Doha Accord
[elections] law, in the hopes of securing the majority for the March 8
coalition.
Annan decries 'atrocities' in Syria
April 08, 2012/Daily Star /GENEVA: Kofi Annan, the joint U.N. and Arab League
envoy on Syria, urged Syria's government on Sunday to fully implement its
commitment to a cease-fire, and he condemned "a surge in violence and
atrocities" that is occurring there.Annan said in a statement in Geneva that the
fighting is causing "alarming levels of casualties, refugees and displaced
persons" and that it must stop.Activists say Syrian troops are continuing their
assault on restive regions, despite a plan that calls for government forces to
withdraw from towns and villages by Tuesday, and for the regime and rebels to
lay down their arms by 6 a.m. Thursday. But Syria's government appeared to be
backtracking on Sunday by demanding written guarantees from its foes to lay down
their weapons before withdrawing its own troops. The commander of the rebel Free
Syrian Army, Col. Riad al-Asaad, quickly rejected that demand, saying his group
does not recognize Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime and therefore will not
give such guarantees.
Syria wants 'written guarantees' from opposition
The BBC's Jim Muir:
Syria's government wants "written guarantees" from the opposition before it
withdraws its troops from flashpoints in parts of the country. Peace envoy Kofi
Annan had not yet supplied agreements in writing from "armed terrorist groups to
stop violence in all its forms", it said. The statement comes two days before a
UN-backed deadline for a ceasefire.The leader of the rebel forces has refused to
agree to Damascus's demands, the Associated Press reports.Colonel Riad al-Asaad,
commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, said his group did not recognise
President Bashar al-Assad's government and therefore would not give guarantees.
He told the AP by telephone that rebel soldiers would lay down their arms if the
government in Damascus abided by Mr Annan's peace plan.
Earlier, in a statement from his office in Geneva, Mr Annan spoke of his "shock"
at the recent escalation in bloodshed but did not directly mention the Syrian
foreign ministry statement.
Saturday saw some of the deadliest violence yet in the year-long uprising with
as many as 160 people killed. As we get closer to the Tuesday 10 April deadline,
I remind the Syrian government of the need for full implementation of its
commitments ”Major new offensives are being reported by activists in the central
city of Hama, the north-west province of Idlib and Aleppo, a province in the far
north.
Severe doubt Under Mr Annan's six-point plan - which received UN approval last
week - all parties are expected to halt armed violence by 10 April, with a full
ceasefire on 12 April.
But Syria's foreign ministry said on Sunday that the international community was
"mistaken" in its belief that Damascus had said it would pull its troops from
cities and their suburbs by Tuesday.
"Kofi Annan has until now not furnished to the Syrian government written
guarantees about the acceptance of the armed terrorist groups to stop violence
in all its forms, and their readiness to surrender their weapons so that state
authority can spread on all territory," the statement said.
Damascus also wanted "guarantees of commitment by the governments of Qatar,
Saudi Arabia and Turkey to stop financing the armed terrorist groups", it said.
The BBC's Jim Muir, reporting from neighbouring Lebanon, says it is clear that
Damascus is seeking complete surrender from the opposition rather than accepting
a balanced truce arrangement and then talks. That leaves both the timeline and
the whole structure of the Annan peace plan under severe doubt, he adds. Kofi
Annan said he was shocked at "recent reports of a surge in violence and
atrocities in several towns and villages in Syria, resulting in alarming levels
of casualties, refugees and displaced persons, in violation of assurances given
to me".
"As we get closer to the Tuesday 10 April deadline, I remind the Syrian
government of the need for full implementation of its commitments and stress
that the present escalation of violence is unacceptable," he said in his
statement. "This is a time when we must all urgently work towards a full
cessation of hostilities, providing the space for humanitarian access and
creating the conditions for a political process to address the legitimate
aspirations and concerns of the Syrian people."
Syria suggests it might not pull forces by deadline By the CNN Wire Staff
updated 8:20 AM EDT, Sun April 8, 2012
(CNN) -- Syria will not commit to pulling armed forces from cities only to have
"armed terrorist groups" commit attacks, a Syrian foreign ministry spokesman
said Sunday. The comments, made by Jihad Maqdisi on state-run TV, came two days
before a Tuesday deadline for regime forces to withdraw from cities, which the
government had agreed to as part of a peace plan laid out by U.N.-Arab League
special envoy Kofi Annan. But "Annan did not give written assurances that the
armed groups would turn in their weapons," Makdissi said. Annan has said he
expects rebel fighters to also cease fire after the Tuesday deadline, but the
deadline itself was for regime forces to withdraw from cities. "Syria will not
repeat what happened during the (Arab League) mission, when it committed to the
exit of its armed forces from the cities and surrounding areas, then the armed
terrorist groups took advantage to arm its members and conduct all forms of
terrorism," Makdissi said, referring to an Arab League monitoring mission that
took place several months ago. Throughout the more than year-long uprising
against the regime, the Syrian government has consistently blamed violence on
"armed terrorist groups." But U.N. and other world leaders have said the
government is engaged in a violent crackdown. Reports from Syrian opposition
activists suggest government forces are slaughtering civilians in an attempt to
wipe out dissidents seeking President Bashar al-Assad's ouster. The al-Assad
family has ruled Syria for 42 years.
Rebel fighters have taken up arms, but their strength has often paled in
comparison to the better-equipped regime troops.
At least 12 people were killed in fresh violence across the country Sunday,
according to the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, a network of opposition
activists. The deaths included three in Hama; four in Homs; two in Deir Ezzor;
two in Idlib, and one in Aleppo. The group also said at least 127 people were
killed on Saturday, including 59 deaths in Hama. The LCC said Syrian forces have
been targeting civilians displaced from their homes by earlier fighting.
Specifically, the LCC said, the regime is attacking villages and farms around
the eastern city of Rastan, where fighting a month ago forced out more than 80%
of residents. They escaped to the nearby areas but are now coming under attack,
the group said Saturday.
Syria said Sunday that the bodies of six "army and law enforcement martyrs" were
buried.
CNN cannot independently verify reports of violence and deaths, as the
government has severely restricted access to international media.
On Sunday morning, the state-run Syrian Arab News Agency made little mention of
any new violence but showed images of packed demonstrations that it said took
place a day earlier.
"Syrian citizens in all the Syrian provinces on Saturday flocked to the main
squares to celebrate the 65th anniversary of the foundation of the Baath Arab
Socialist Party," SANA said. "The participants in the rallies expressed the
Syrian people, army and leadership's steadfastness in the face of the conspiracy
hatched against Syria."
One LCC activist in Homs, identified only as Saleem for safety reasons,
described a massacre outside a local school that the Syrian army used to launch
offensives and detain people.
Saleem said the bodies of 13 people, including youths, were found with signs of
torture.
"The truth is we have become used to such massacres. We have seen people
beheaded, children killed, bodies torn apart, and nothing surprises us anymore,"
Saleem said Saturday. "All we could do is pray to all for help and call on the
world to intervene." Annan's six-point plan for Syria includes calls for a
cease-fire by both sides and a Syrian-led political process to end the crisis.
SANA reported Saturday that the government sent two identical letters to the
president of the U.N. Security Council and to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon,
accusing Arab and Western countries of backing the armed groups.
In the letters, Syria claimed that "terrorist acts committed by the armed
terrorist groups in Syria have increased during the last few days, particularly
after reaching an understanding on Kofi Annan's plan," according to SANA. The
letters said 2,088 Syrian forces and 478 police officers have been killed. The
United Nations estimates that the fighting in Syria, which began a year ago, has
killed at least 9,000 people. The LCC puts the toll at more than 11,000.
*CNN's Ivan Watson, Kareem Khadder, Samira Said, and Salma Abdelaziz contributed
to this report.
Interview with Assad's former university
Professor Mousa al-Kurdi
Al-Assad has become a “monster” – Former university professor
07/04/2012/By Asharq Al-Awsat
Istanbul, Asharq Al-Awsat – Professor Mousa al-Kurdi gave heart-wrenching
testimony about the humanitarian situation on the ground in Syria before the
recent “Friends of Syria” conference in Istanbul. Professor al-Kurdi has
personally witnessed Bashar al-Assad’s transformation from “courteous” student
to “monster”, as the Syrian president was one of his students at the University
of Damascus. In an exclusive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Bashar al-Assad’s
former university professor reveals his take on the Syrian revolution, his
former student Bashar al-Assad, and his hopes for the future of the country.
The following is the full text of the interview:
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What is your profession?
[Al-Kurdi] I am a university professor, independent academic, and oncologist. I
am also the president of the Arab Institute for Clinical Excellence; I was
elected to this post by the Council of Arab Ministers of Health more than 5
years ago.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] Why did you appear to give evidence before the “Friends of
Syria” conference?
[Al-Kurdi] The Syrian National Council [SNC] called on me to present a general
picture about what is happening in Syria, because I – along with some members of
my family – recently spent a year and a half in Syria where I worked with a
small group to deliver some medical assistance to those who were suffering,
particularly in Baba Amr and the rest of Homs. Transferring blood bags [into
Syria] is, in the eyes of the regime, a crime punishable by death or at least
arrest and referral to court. The same goes for transferring medical equipment.
The person responsible for smuggling us into Syria was turned over to the
courts. Whilst those who support the revolution and freedom have their throat
cut whilst they are still alive, whilst those who take pictures or transfer
video clips about the revolution abroad are blinded and then killed…many people
had not heard about this before, and this had a significant impact on everybody
[at the Friends of Syria conference].
[Asharq Al-Awsat] When did you return to Syria?
[Al-Kurdi] I returned to Syria a year and a half ago, to live in Damascus, and
carry out my task of improving healthcare there. Prior to leaving the country, I
taught at the University of Damascus, and Dr. Bashar al-Assad was one of my
students.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] Were you in direct contact with him?
[Al-Kurdi] Don’t hold that against me…
[Asharq Al-Awsat] Can you tell us about his character?
[Al-Kurdi] He was very different than he is today.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] In what way?
[Al-Kurdi] He was very mild-mannered, courteous and kind…at this time he did not
demonstrate any excessiveness, whilst his bodyguards were very discreet and did
not cause any disturbances. Nobody at Damascus University paid much attention to
them.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What about your own relationship with him?
[Al-Kurdi] There was previously a sense of cordiality on his part, in one of the
conferneces that took place in 2004, Bouthaina Shaban [al-Assad's media adviser]
came to introduce me to him, and he told her that I had been one of his
professors [at university].
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What was Bashar al-Assad like as a student?
[Al-Kurdi] There were a large number of students at university, but I recall
that he was mild-mannered and he would attend all of my lectures without fail.
He would also attend the scientific sessions. I recall that he was very
courteous with his fellow students, and he was very popular and well-liked.
It was clear that he was courteous to his colleagues, but I recall hearing that
once, upon being criticized...he cut off the conversation and stormed out of the
room. However he is generally remembered fondly, but only by those who do not
oppose the government. I have been repreatedly told that he has not forgiven my
leaving Syria in 1992. A senior official informed me that the projects that I
have proposed are hindered by the fact that I left Syria. So he has turned
against supporting his old teachers for political reasons, to the point that he
refused to help development of health care in Arab worlds, and tried to stop
this.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What happened?
[Al-Kurdi] This president who was previously calling for renewal and
modernization turned into a monster, but he is a monster that can only scare the
weak, and this is proof that he is a coward and will only be deterred by force
or the threat of force.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What are your views of the “year of the revolution”?
[Al-Kurdi] What is interesting is the intensification in the news about regions
that are loyal [to the regime], for I would say that the majority of Damascus –
where I lived – has defected from the regime, including the university
professors and students, as well as even the officers and officials. The vast
majority of people are waiting for the killing to end to return to the street.
People informed me that they have had enough of this killing and destruction, as
well as the lies of the media, namely that Damascus is loyal [to the regime].
Whilst opinion polls of Syrian expatriates in the US also revealed that around
80 percent want to see regime change, and the majority of these expatriates are
Christians. There are a small percentage of the people who support the regime
till death, including some members of my own family, but they are only a very
small percentage. The regime is targeting entire cities, and this is what
happened in Homs. As a soldier in the Syrian revolution, I will try to provide
support via international organizations who I will conduct dialogue with.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] Can you tell us more about this?
[Al-Kurdi] I do not like to talk about this issue, as some people may be harmed
by this.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What do you mean?
[Al-Kurdi] Firstly, I don’t know who you are, and even if I did, it’s not
important, for the lives of other people are more important than my own, and
there are some people who are risking their lives – and the lives of their
family – to transfer what needs to be transferred at the right time. It is clear
that intimidation tactics are being used, and there is only one way to deal with
a regime that wants to rule us or annihilate us.
[Asharq Al-Awsat] When did you leave Syria?
[Al-Kurdi] I left Syria for Cambridge in March, where my wife underwent surgery,
and at this time I did not know that I would be leaving and not returning! I was
invited to the special conference for the unification of the [Syrian]
opposition, and I was asked to give testimony to the “Friends of Syria”
conference, so I now have no chance of returning [to Syria] because if I do I
would be mince-meat!
[Asharq Al-Awsat] What were your impressions about the situation in Syria the
last time you were there?
[Al-Kurdi] If the situation remains the same, with regards to the killing and
slaughter…then things will go on another course, for nothing will stop the
people after what happened. I think the army will become more divided and people
will take to the streets in their millions, if the killing does not stop.
Syrian disinformation about Christian persecution
by Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi, Oskar Svadkovsky and Phillip Smyth
Ha'aretz
April 6, 2012
http://www.meforum.org/3208/syria-christian-persecution
Recent reports out of Syria have warned of the ethnic cleansing of 90 percent of
the Christian population of Homs, the city that has been ravaged by the conflict
between Assad's forces and armed opposition groups since the uprising against
the regime began in February last year. The responsibility for the mass killings
and expulsions has been pinned on an armed opposition group known as the "Al-Faruq
Brigade."
This claim first gained wide distribution in a report published on March 21 by
Agenzia Fides (the official Vatican news agency), which declared its source to
be "a note sent to Fides by some sources in the Syrian Orthodox Church."
Fides added that "in the 'Faruq Brigade,' note other sources, there seems [sic]
to be armed elements of various Wahhabi groups and mercenaries from Libya and
Iraq."
The claim of 90 percent ethnic cleansing can actually be traced to a report put
out on March 13 by an online Arabic outlet known as Al-Haqiqa (Arabic for "the
truth").
A quick Google search reveals that the original memo sent to Fides by the church
leaders had been copy-pasted almost down to the last word from the SyriaTruth
site, which is notorious for its pro-regime propaganda. Officials of the Syrian
Church did not confirm the story with anybody in Homs before sending out the
memo. They must have presumed that the SyriaTruth writers did.
As a matter of fact, Al-Haqiqa had already been taken to task by the Middle East
Media Research Institute (MEMRI), which specifically referred to its reporting
of extensive Al-Qaida and international jihadist presence among the Syrian
opposition as "bogus."
Shortly after publishing the memo, Fides began backpedaling, in an attempt to
mitigate the impact of the original report. [1] Later, it released another
report quoting the "Jesuits of Homs," who told the outlet that there were no
cases to their knowledge of Christians being forced out of their homes by
Islamists.
Homs happens to be around 30 kilometers from the border with Lebanon, which is
home to a large and relatively powerful Christian community, making it a natural
destination for Christian refugees - indeed, around 20,000 Iraqi Christians have
found safety there since the 2003 invasion. Nevertheless, there has been no
reported upsurge in Syrian Christian refugees to Lebanon in recent weeks. On
March 8, the Christian Science Monitor reported a few thousand Syrian refugees
fled to Lebanon - mostly Sunnis from the Bab Amr quarter of Homs.
Understandably, Christians have fled their homes amid fears of being caught in
the crossfire. According to a report in Lebanon's Daily Star, some Christians
have been temporarily forced out of their homes by Sunni fighters, but only
because they needed space to fight government forces; further, contrary to the
claims of the Al-Haqiqa report, the fighters allowed the Christians to take what
they needed.
Besides, the claims of straightforward ethnic cleansing by Islamist militants do
not add up, because that is not how jihadist groups deal with Christians. For
example, the standard practice in Iraq for jihadist groups like Al-Qaida -
renowned in Iraq for its brutality - is to first demand jizya, which is a
"poll-tax" imposed on Christian and Jewish minorities, in traditional Islamic
theology. [2]
If the minorities fail to pay jizya, they face bomb attacks or other violence.
Yet the reports in Al-Haqiqa and Fides make no reference to imposition of jizya.
There is little reason to doubt the motivation of Vatican and church leaders,
who after Iraq have become extremely worried about the fate of the remaining
Christian communities in the Middle East.
Yet, over-the-top, sensationalist reporting by SyriaTruth and similarly
pro-regime sites, combined with church leaders both in Syria and abroad
responding by crying wolf before confirming the news, makes for an explosive and
dangerous mix, with the potential of turning unfounded rumors or deliberate
disinformation into self-fulfilling prophecies.
With the death toll in Syria running in the thousands, and many times more
wounded or tortured during the heavy crackdown by security forces on this
predominantly Sunni uprising, there is a steady buildup of anger and frustration
on the Sunni street with regard to the position of Syrian minorities, who often
either are supportive of the regime or have adopted an "on the fence" approach.
As the rebels are reportedly running out of ammunition in many areas, the
opposition leaders are pinning their last hope on the international community.
News in the global media about Syrian Christians disseminating such reports
about their Muslim neighbors can easily become the last straw that will break
the back of the camel of sectarian coexistence.
The Vatican and the local church leaders, preoccupied with the protection of
their communities in Syria, may have the best intentions in the world. But when
they fall for such sites as SyriaTruth, it is tempting to diagnose their case as
one of "With such protectors, who needs Islamists!"
**Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi is a student at Brasenose College, Oxford University,
and an Adjunct Fellow at the Middle East Forum. Oskar Svadkovsky is a computer
networking professional based in Tel Aviv and the owner of the "Happy Arab News
Service" blog. Phillip Smyth is a journalist and researcher specializing in
Middle Eastern affairs. He travels regularly in the region.
Footnotes
[1] In particular, the wording of the original version was changed from "there
is 'an ongoing ethnic cleansing of Christians,' carried out by members of the 'Faruq
Brigade'" to "carried out by some Islamist members of..."; and from "the 'Faruq
Brigade' is run by armed elements of Al-Qa'ida and various Wahhabi groups and
includes mercenaries from Libya and Iraq" to "In the 'Faruq Brigade', note other
sources, there seems to be armed elements of ...and mercenaries from
[2] Observe in the demographic maps of Baghdad that over time one starts to see
the emergence of a few predominantly Christian areas, especially in southern
Baghdad. The Islamist militant groups would expel or kill without reservation
Muslims of the rival sect but allow Christians to remain while extorting jizya
from them, in accordance with traditional interpretations of Qur'an 9:29.
If Islam is the solution then the Muslim Brotherhood is the problem!
By Yousef Al-Dayni/Asharq Alawsat
The devil is clever, as the Egyptian saying goes, in a warning against the
consequences of “illegitimate” meetings, however it seems that the devil of
politics is even cleverer with regards to the manner of the Muslim Brotherhood’s
meetings and get-togethers following a long absence from power. Many comments
have appeared about the Muslim Brotherhood’s contradictory stances, and perhaps
one of the most amusing things was when comedian Mohamed Sobhi likened the
Brotherhood to a long distance runner who insists on drinking all the water laid
out for the participants itself!
Is the nomination of al-Shatar the mistake in its entirety? Or is the true issue
the division over al-Shatar’s nomination, as well as the military’s position on
this? There are dozens of questions emanating from the most confusing scene in
the Brotherhood’s political drama, which seems to be surprising many of those
who do not know the Brotherhood well, or who look upon their policies through
rose-tinted glasses.
Certainly what the Brotherhood is doing is part of a political game and the
group is more adept at this than its opponents, whilst the Supreme Council of
the Armed Forces [SCAF] is trying to match the Brotherhood’s skills, whilst
nobody knows who will win this game. As for the other teams, they have turned
the political arena into a public one whereby the terraces are filled with
screaming, riots and hysteria, but this has only increased the zeal of the
competitors and will likely lead to further polarization.
The Brotherhood and the military are portraying the liberals and other political
forces as entities that have not mastered anything apart from talking on
satellite channels and utilizing obsolete critical tools, whilst they are
portraying the revolutionary youth as being powerless and defeated, having paid
the price for their political naiveté. Even the Salafist movement demonstrated
its political acumen when it pragmatically and intelligently declared its
support for the Brotherhood candidate Khairat al-Shatar, instead of getting on
its high-horse and announcing – as some liberals did – that the Brotherhood are
hypocrites because they have broken all their promises, in the same manner that
they betrayed the trust of the Tahrir Square protesters, who could never have
envisioned that matters would turn out the way they have.
The interesting thing is that historical figures affiliated to the Brotherhood
in Egypt and the Gulf have fallen into a “moral” trap in an attempt not to lose
their reputation as they try to justify the Brotherhood’s political behavior,
which in itself is also unethical.
On the other hand, intellectuals sympathetic to political Islam such as Fahmy
Howeidy and others believe that the Brotherhood has fallen into the trap of the
military establishment, which wants them to lay claim to the entire political
cake, in order to make it easier for SCAF to overthrow them by inciting the
masses and creating new enemies, most notably Egypt’s al-Azhar institute which
has grown weary of the issues surrounding the drafting of the new constitution.
This is in addition to the Brotherhood’s inability to deal with many Arab states
that are wary of them, and in the end such intellectuals have come to the
conclusion that the Brotherhood is not ready to assume all the responsibilities
it has accrued.
From my point of view there is great confusion in the Brotherhood’s
interpretation of events, and this is largely due to the Brotherhood themselves.
The once “outlawed” group has begun to practice politics using the remote
control of the General Guide, rather than through the “Freedom and Justice”
party. Thus it is easy to imagine that the issue of deciding to nominate a
presidential candidate was not put forward by the political party, but rather by
the Brotherhood’s Shura Council, along the lines of the “Saqifah” [house where
Abu Bakr was nominated as the first Muslim Caliph]. In the end, only two votes
were important in making this decision. Likewise, the General Guide’ statements
after the January Revolution were nothing more than a confirmation of the
group’s comprehensive outlook which approaches the borders of patriarchy,
whereby the Brotherhood believes it above the logic of the state because of its
Islamic reference - from its point of view its governing reference, and the
human constraints that limit other political parties do not apply to it. Here
lies the mistake and confusion: The group sees itself as an [Islamic] reference,
and its politicians govern according to this religious view.
What is really concerning is not the Brotherhood’s stance but rather SCAF’s
silence. The Brotherhood’s stance, with all due respect to each of its
opponents, is a pragmatic and intelligent political stance because it provokes
SCAF’s silence, and sends a message to the Salafists, and likewise to Islamist
candidates who have defected from the Brotherhood, that the Brotherhood’s cadres
can somewhat turn the street against them by attracting influential groups in
the voting process. This stance also sends a message to the international
community, namely that those who want to negotiate on Egyptian affairs must not
exclude the Brotherhood.
SCAF came closest to negotiating with the Brotherhood early on, and before and
after them the Americans, but the dispute in negotiations can be deduced from
SCAF’s subsequent statements regarding which part of the ruling authority the
Brotherhood could control, without – in particular – hampering the army’s
economic institutions. What is happening now is only the postponement of a clash
between the two parties, in an intelligent manner…SCAF warns that it might use
violence against those who want to tamper with the homeland, even if they are
its own citizens, whilst the Brotherhood, in its new discourse, have not
exempted any state institution, in reference to the army’s share of the economic
pie. Everyone is speaking in sensationalist language; the Brotherhood is
thinking of the interests of the nation, the army is speaking in the name of the
nation, while the future of this country is very unclear, and there are a huge
number of outstanding questions that the two parties continue to remain silent
on. For example, what is the future of the post of Supreme Commander of the
Armed Forces? How will the economic arm of the military establishment be
handled? Does the Brotherhood have a military wing?
The project of “hijacking” the state via political legitimacy is not a new idea
or a reaction from the Brotherhood; rather this is a fait accompli, in agreement
with SCAF and the United States who have marketed the Brotherhood model as one
that can be politically controlled, regardless of its views on the issues of
freedom, rights and pluralism. This is as if we are facing a return to
dictatorship, but in the style, language and tools of democracy, as well as via
guarantees of authority that will ensure a state of stability by the force of
“predominance”.
The most important question is: Why not play the game out in the open, instead
of using religious slogans? Or as some followers of the Muslim Brotherhood, who
are gently admonishing the organization, are asking: why was Aboul Fotouh not
supported by the majority of political forces that serve the Islamic trend? What
will be the difference if Hazem Abu Ismail wins, particularly as he was once a
Brotherhood member?
Certainly, the Muslim Brotherhood is the political entity most adept at reading
the signs on the street. They have realized that the stage requires an Islamist
president that owes allegiance to the ideology of the Brotherhood, rather than
an actual affiliate of the Brotherhood’s party. This is not something that the
Brotherhood believes that the liberal Aboul Fotouh can claim, whilst neither can
Abu Ismail, particularly with regards to the rumors revolving around him and
about his potential ineligibility because of the “nationality of his mother”.
Most critically, the Brotherhood has secured political ground that cannot be
fought over, namely the parliament and the constitution drafting committee, and
now wants nothing less than to play the presidential card along the lines of the
former nationalist parties that consumed everything under the pretext of
“democracy”.
If we were to contest the Brotherhood’s promotion of its ambiguous slogan “Islam
is the solution”, it is certain, despite the fact that the Brotherhood is more
than politically entitled to play the game, that they themselves represent the
forthcoming crisis in the country. Those who betrayed their own affiliates in
the past, leading to their detention, will not hesitate to seize power today at
the expense of their bewildered revolutionary comrades.