LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
ِAugust 06/2011

Bible Quotation for today
ٌ
Romans Chapter 6/1-14: "1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?  May it never be! We who died to sin, how could we live in it any longer? 3 Or don’t you know that all we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?  We were buried therefore with him through baptism to death, that just like Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we also might walk in newness of life.  For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we will also be part of his resurrection;  knowing this, that our old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be in bondage to sin.  For he who has died has been freed from sin.  But if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him;  knowing that Christ, being raised from the dead, dies no more. Death no more has dominion over him!  For the death that he died, he died to sin one time; but the life that he lives, he lives to God.  Thus consider yourselves also to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord.  Therefore don’t let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts.  Neither present your members to sin as instruments of unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God, as alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God.  For sin will not have dominion over you. For you are not under law, but under grace".

Latest analysis, editorials, studies, reports, letters & Releases from miscellaneous sources
Cracks in the armor of the Resistance/By: Nadine Elali and Shane Farrell/August 5/11
President Amin Gemayel's Speech of August 05/Now Lebanon/11
Our dictator, our fault/Michael Young, /
August 05/11
Lebanon’s YouTube/Hazem al-Amin/August 05/11

Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for August 05/11
Russia: NATO close to military steps in Syria for beachhead to attack Iran/DEBKAfile
At Least 10 Dead as Thousands March against Assad in Syria/Naharnet
Turkey Says Syrian Violence Unacceptable /Naharnet
Prominent Syrian Poet Urges Assad to Step Down /Naharnet
Syria Brotherhood to Miqati: You're Bargaining on Your Political Future by Siding with Our Children Killers/Naharnet
Libya Rebels Say NATO Strike Kills Gadhafi Son, Regime Denies/Naharnet
Cyprus President Appoints New Cabinet/Naharnet
President Amin
Gemayel Rejects Hizbullah Threats to Turn Arms Against its Foes/Naharnet
Blast, Followed by Fire, Hits Iran Oil Pipeline /Naharnet
STL to Unveil New List of Suspects by End of August/Naharnet
Huge Blaze Breaks Out at Building in Salim Salam Area, Residents Flee on Fire Ladders/Naharnet
Beirut:Prisoners Relatives Block Airport, Akkar Roads over Demands/Naharnet
Assassination Attempt on Palestinian Commander in Ain al-Hilweh/Naharnet
MP Marwan Hamadeh condemns Tuesday’s attack on anti-Syrian regime rally/Now Lebanon
Leader of major Lebanese auto theft gang arrested/The Daily Star
Movement MP Mohammed Kabarra: Lebanon shares responsibility for bloodshed in Syria/The Daily Star
Lebanon’s U.N. vote on Syria ignites debate/The Daily Star


Russia: NATO close to military steps in Syria for beachhead to attack Iran
DEBKAfile Special Report
http://www.debka.com/article/21183/
August 5, 2011/ Twelve hours after Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned Assad he faced a "sad fate" if he failed to introduce reforms, Moscow's envoy to NATO Dmitry Rogozin accused the Western alliance of planning a military campaign against Syria to help overthrow the Assad regime "with the long-reaching goal of preparing a beachhead for an attack on Iran."
In an interview published by Izvestia Friday, Aug. 5, the knowledgeable and high-placed Rogozin added: "This statement means that the planning [of the military campaign] is well underway. It could be a logical conclusion of those military and propaganda operations, which have been carried out by certain Western countries against North Africa."
Thursday, as the Syrian military crackdown in Hama reached a new level of ferocity with public executions in the town square, the Russian president warned Assad: "We are watching how the situation is developing. It's changing and our approach is changing as well."
debkafile's Moscow sources note that the Rogozin added Yemen to his remarks on NATO: He said he agreed with the opinion that Syria and later Yemen could be NATO's last steps on the way to launching an attack on Iran.
"The noose around Iran is tightening," he said. "Military planning against Iran is underway. And we are certainly concerned about an escalation of a large-scale war in this huge region."
The Russian envoy made a point of citing NATO – never once mentioning the United States in his remarks. However, they were definitely meant to clarify to Washington that Moscow is fully updated on the next American military steps in the Middle East and Persian Gulf. debkafile's military sources add: The Libyan campaign taught NATO that without US military strength, alliance members were incapable of defeating even a small army on the scale of Muammar Qaddafi's six brigades, much less muster the ground, air and sea forces for striking Syria and Iran. The only power with the requisite military strength is the United States, which was therefore the unspoken address of Rogozin's warning. Russian diplomats have repeatedly cautioned Tehran that it incurs the danger of American attack on its nuclear facilities. Now Syria has been included. Rogozin remarked that having "learned the Libyan lesson, Russia will continue to oppose a forcible resolution of the situation in Syria."


MP Marwan Hamadeh condemns Tuesday’s attack on anti-Syrian regime rally
August 5, 2011 ظMP Marwan Hamadeh condemned the attack against the anti-Syrian regime rally held in Hamra, Beirut near the Syrian embassy on Tuesday, adding that the “Embassy acted with protesters as if it is a security directorate in [Syria’s] Hama or Daraa.”The Syrian Embassy in Beirut transformed into a security zone, Hamadeh told Al-Arabiya television, adding that some parties are “using the excuse of protecting the embassy to prevent any action to voice solidarity with the Syrian people.” Dozens of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad supporters attacked a small rally held in Hamra, leaving at least five injured. He added that Lebanon’s decision to abstain from voting on the UN Security Council presidential statement pertaining to the crisis in Syria is “dishonorable.”The UN Security Council on Wednesday condemned Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's deadly crackdown on protests and called for those responsible for violence to be held "accountable."Lebanon did not block the adoption, but disavowed the document.-NOW Lebanon

President Amin Gemayel's Speech of August 05/11
August 5, 2011
On August 5, Kataeb Party leader Amin Gemayel delivered a speech on the occasion of the 29th annual conference of his party:
“We have made the people feel that they are renewing their trust in the [Kataeb Party], which [is preserving the] Christian presence, guarantees the national pact [of coexistence], and protects the belief in sovereignty. The Kataeb does not bargain or change its principles, it does not divert from its environment, does not sell the Christians and does not [seek] personal gain [at the expense of the country]. Our conference coincides with a crucial phase on the local, regional and international levels. On the Lebanese level we can see that the sectarian-system formula is collapsing, on the regional level we watch autocratic regimes falling, and on the international level we witness a shaken financial system.
The change in the Middle East is bloody, whereas the change in the west takes place peacefully in [the framework of] institutions. We stand beside the Arab people on the path to change and to autonomy and condemn all violent acts against innocent people. But any change that comes at the expense of principles and that does not result in a true democracy does not concern us. A military dictatorship and a religious extremism are the same.
We would have wished for Syria to follow Lebanon’s democratic system instead of fostering strife. While Arab groups are aiming for progress and seeking democracy, some Lebanese parties intend to drag Lebanon into a different atmosphere. Is it right that Lebanon become a model of the past, when a century ago it constituted a model of the future?
The Kataeb Party calls on all of the Lebanese to be aware and to unite in order to prevent the occurrence of regional and international developments at our expense. Lebanon is suffering a great crisis, almost a war. If all the Lebanese parties do not fulfill their historical responsibilities, nothing will guarantee that the country does not move to the stage of war, with all the dangers against the existence [of Lebanon] that it carries.
It is planned for Lebanon to participate in the war for two reasons: either to establish a mini-state or to take over the whole state. And in both cases this puts the Lebanese in two kinds of danger: open strife or final division. Let everyone know that our choice is that of unity and state [building]. The Lebanese, Muslims and Christians, will not allow anyone to change the identity of Lebanon. We will not let anyone have what we refused to grant Israel, the Syrian regime and Palestinian factions.
We are the masters of the Lebanese, pure and independent Resistance. We are the parents of the thousands of martyrs killed for the sake of Lebanon. Before reaching the point of no return, Hezbollah must realize that its project is doomed to failure. Regardless of the probe of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL)’s investigation, we assure Hezbollah that no one in Lebanon wants its head to be cut off, but we do not accept [the Shia group] to threaten our heads with its arms. We understand the [fears] of Hezbollah, and we are ready, as national partners, to reassure each other through [drafting a] new national pact when the circumstances allow it.
The greatest danger to Hezbollah is [its policy of] borrowing the Israeli “security” logic to protect itself. Stability is guaranteed by the logic of the state, politics, cooperation, openness and peace. Israel is adopting the “security” logic against its enemies and Hezbollah is adopting it against the people of his country. Is that possible?
The glory of Hezbollah does not only result from its combatting Israel. Hezbollah must triumph on itself. Being allied to external countries will not guarantee the permanence of Hezbollah. What guarantees it is the [co-existence] with other Lebanese. We suggest for Hezbollah to acknowledge the Lebanese state and its democratic system as the only source of authorities and public decisions.
Granting the state authority over the use of arms is an implementation of the Lebanese constitution and is the simplest form of belonging to the state. Turning over those accused [of murdering former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005] to the STL should be the responsibility [of Hezbollah]. No for Hezbollah’s arms’ use of arms outside state authority. Yes for state weapons. Those arms have become a [barrier] between Hezbollah and the rest of the Lebanese and have turned [the Shia group] into their enemy. The state should also acquire the arms of the Palestinian factions inside and outside Lebanon’s refugee camp and have full authority over its territory.
Four characteristics marked our existence in the Middle East: Freedom, security, resistance and impartiality. This combination constitutes Lebanon’s independence, sovereignty and the people’s development and dignity. If some people have a problem with the word “impartiality,” I say that every party expresses it in a different way: neutralizing Lebanon, nonalignment, avoiding getting involved in the crises of others, not intervening in others’ internal affairs…
Security, freedom and resistance are… natural tendencies for the Lebanese people. And impartiality is a constitutional position that guarantees the first three characteristics and protects them from power-balance changes and [international machinations]. It also protects internal security and external sovereignty. So far, there is an agreement between the Lebanese on three main issues: keeping a parliamentary democracy, establishing a civil state and having administrative decentralization.
We reiterate our call to implement administrative decentralization and ensure balanced development across the country. There is hesitation [in the government’s] implementation of reforms based on disagreement on details. This issue causes Lebanon’s government to lose the ability to make decisions. And the people will submit to being terrorized by the use of [non-state] arms. The presence of half a million Palestinians on Lebanese soil is a national and humanitarian problem. Lebanon can neither afford this number [of refugees] nor can the Palestinians afford their quality of life inside the camps. A solution must be reached regarding this issue, and we refuse to naturalize the Palestinians in Lebanon.
We also suggest to speed up the ratification of relevant laws in order to move toward a civil society in which we separate religion from the state. This should come along with the establishment of a senate that will have [specific] functions and powers. A new electoral law should also be finalized. In this transparent atmosphere, and after the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) failed to carry out its work and the Arab countries turned their backs on the Palestinian case, and after the [Israeli-Arab] negotiations focused only on the Israeli settlements and not on Palestinians refugees, we demand the United Nations and specifically the UN Security Council to hold a conference that studies the fate of Palestinian refugees and takes effective decisions regarding this issue after the project of Palestinians’ return to their homeland failed.
This development worries us. We fully support the Palestinian case, but we are also completely against all forms of settlement of Palestinians in Lebanon. We do not support the UN-backed STL just because [our relatives] have been martyred, but because we believe in justice and we want stability. We want to live [with other parties] transparently and without avenging anyone. We do not believe in revenge because we are the sons of God, not the Party of God [Hezbollah].
After the forming of the new cabinet, [which is dominated by the Hezbollah-led March 8 coalition], Lebanon needs a new revolution to restore its democracy. If those who reject the STL try to rebel against the achievement of justice and try to harm security, they will be further charged and [confirm] their current charges. The new Lebanese cabinet has put Lebanon in the eye of the storm and in confrontation with most of Lebanese people as well as the international community.
[Former Prime Minister] Saad Hariri’s cabinet was not brought down because it failed to lower national debt, but because it protected the STL and guaranteed the implementation of international resolutions. Resuming the national dialogue requires all Lebanese parties to believe in the state of law and justice and in state power only. No one in Lebanon refuses the principle of dialogue, especially the Kataeb Party, which devoted itself for the dialogue and always calls for [making] Lebanon a message of dialogue, to the extent that some people blame us for adopting a policy of openness in the most difficult circumstances.
What is the benefit of dialogue if [Hezbollah] considers its arms to be sacred, if they consider that they have their own republic and if they are abolishing democracy by staging a coup? [What is the point of having dialogue] regarding the STL if they consider the accused to be saints? If the accused were saints, we would not have martyrs.”
Only 25% of a given NOW Lebanon article can be republished.

Movement MP Mohammed Kabarra: Lebanon shares responsibility for bloodshed in Syria:

August 05, 2011/ The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanon must now claim some responsibility for violence in Syria, after it distanced itself from a U.N. Security Council condemnation of the violent crackdown in the country, Future Movement MP Mohammed Kabarra said Friday. "Lebanon today, after the disgraceful position at the U.N. Security Council, became a Syrian regime partner and is now also responsible for every drop of blood and every fall of a martyr in the massacres committed against the Syrian people," Kabarra told visitors in Tripoli.
He slammed Prime Minister Najib Mikati’s Cabinet for defending Syria’s bloody crackdown on protesters. "The government claims to be committed to protecting Lebanon's interests and international reputation, yet the country's stance at the U.N. yesterday accomplished the opposite," Kabbara added. Lebanon’s deputy U.N. Ambassador Caroline Ziade carried out an infrequently used procedure, disassociating the country from the statement after it was approved and read out verbally at the council’s meeting. Lawmakers in the Hezbollah-led March 8 camp have expressed different views on the issue, stressing the need to stay out of Syria’s internal affairs. Lebanon’s top officials and lawmakers meeting Thursday at Parliament disputed the decision to disassociate itself from the statement. Mikati and Speaker Nabih Berri sought to justify Lebanon’s position as a decision to refrain from intervening in Damascus’ internal affairs, which would benefit the country’s bilateral relations with Syria. “Let the world know that the Lebanese people are with a free Syria and that they have nothing to do with the [Lebanese] government’s stance which dissociated itself from a position condemning violence and massacres,” Kabarra said Friday.

Our dictator, our fault?

Michael Young, /Now Lebanon
August 5, 2011
The images of a fallen autocrat defending himself from within a chicken coop can be enthralling. Watching Hosni Mubarak on trial earlier this week, Arabs all over must have superimposed a face of their own choosing on that of the dying man lying in his bed.
The killing of the father is a favorite theme in literature and psychology, but its most forceful manifestations can usually be witnessed in politics. A democratic Egypt, if one emerges, will need to transcend Mubarak—not to mention the garland of fathers in the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces. However, a warning is in order. Those Arab societies that have rejected their regimes and are going through revolutionary transformations today should also address seriously why they remained for so long under the boot of absolute, kleptocratic, usually homicidal leaderships.
If events in Egypt end mainly with punishment of Mubarak and his sons and cronies, then Egyptians will have achieved relatively little. Getting rid of a dictator is no substitute for the overhaul of the deeper infrastructures of Arab societies facilitating authoritarian rule.
Take the Arab reaction to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein’s overthrow in 2003. Overwhelmingly, the peoples of the Middle East condemned the American invasion of Iraq, coloring their views of Saddam. The region’s worst mass murderer somehow received a dispensation because no one could stomach his enemy. Saddam became associated with what was soon perceived as a legitimate resistance, despite its systematic murder of innocents.
A personal episode helps illustrate how warped was the reasoning in those days. When Saddam was caught in his “spider hole,” an Arab academic living in the United States explained to me how much he regretted the development. “Bush will benefit from it,” he groaned.
When observers can take such a functional view of what was, in its own way, a moral accomplishment, you know there is a problem. Saddam Hussein’s crimes, regardless of who removed him from power or benefited from his capture, were sufficiently monstrous for sensible Arabs to consider them independently of context, on their own terms. The region is indeed a better place without a man who butchered nearly half a million Iraqis, and provoked a war against Iran leading to the death or injury of well over a million others.
Instead of turning Saddam Hussein’s downfall to their own advantage in battles with their homegrown greater or lesser Saddams, many Arabs talked only about America. What they could have said was that it was up to the Iraqis themselves, and Arabs in general, to depose such an odious individual, not the Americans. They could have said that, with Saddam gone, it was incumbent upon Arabs to help rebuild a postwar Iraq, thereby accelerating an American withdrawal. They could even have said that, American intervention aside, Saddam was a victim of his own hubris and egoism, the same hubris and egoism saturating their own leaders, so that any strike against hubris and egoism was for the greater good of the Arab world.
Yet a crushing majority of Arabs said no such things.
As Egyptians debate the meaning of Mubarak’s trial, shouldn’t they be engaging in greater introspection? Shouldn’t the Iraqis or the Tunisians, too, like the Yemenis, Bahrainis and Saudis? Or the indomitable Syrians? That entire countries were governed for decades by despots and their families, whose mere presence was a daily insult to citizens, was—and in many places still is—quite troubling.
Nor can this flaw be washed away solely by the trial or execution of a former leader. Removing the father is only one step in a liberal revolution. Unless societies build institutions to preserve and enhance democratic behavior and individual freedom, revolutions replace one despot with another, one authoritarianism with another.
Syrians are paying an intolerable price for 40 years of dismal, stifling Assad rule. It would be unfair to portray the ongoing carnage as penance for having permitted a single family to humiliate Syria for so long. By pursuing their struggle peacefully and avoiding the sectarian traps set by the regime, the demonstrators have grasped that the essence of their democratic renaissance must be to embody the antithesis of what Bashar al-Assad and his acolytes represent. When the Syrians finally do overcome the beast, and provided they do so without violence by way of sectarian inclusiveness, they may be better placed than Egypt to move toward a democratic order.
Despotism is a frame of mind as much as it is an individual imposing his writ on all. Arabs striving to regain their liberty and impose the rule of law will have to break down complex structures of obedience and conformity that were, or still are, manipulated by their leaders. These structures include fear of violent repression, but also oppressive ideologies, sectarian prejudices, social and financial dependencies, a tendency to engage in self-censorship, and much else.
Congratulate Egyptians for putting Hosni Mubarak before a judge. However, they, like all Arabs, should also place their society before a severe judge—themselves—and determine what responsibility they bear for Mubarak. The answer will truly set them free.
**Michael Young is opinion editor of the Daily Star newspaper in Beirut and author of The Ghosts of Martyrs Square: An Eyewitness Account of Lebanon’s Life Struggle. He tweets @BeirutCalling.

Lebanon’s U.N. vote on Syria ignites debate
August 05, 2011/The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Lebanon’s top officials and lawmakers meeting Thursday at Parliament disputed Lebanon’s decision to disassociate itself from a U.N. Security Council statement condemning violence in Syria. Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Najbi Mikati sought to justify Lebanon’s position in the Security Council as a decision to refrain from intervening in Damascus’ internal affairs, which would benefit the country’s bilateral relations with Syria. Meanwhile, Chouf MP Marwan Hamade questioned Lebanon’s decision to disassociate itself from the formal statement condemning Syrian President Bashar Assad’s deadly crackdown on protests, which the other 14 members of the U.N. Security Council agreed on.
“Isn’t it a shame that Lebanon [disassociates] itself from the statement of the Security Council?” asked Hamade during Thursday’s legislative session in Parliament.
But Berri said that Lebanon’s stance was being “unjustly” judged. “Lebanon’s position was not against the international community. Let’s continue to adhere to the policy that saves our country,” Berri noted. Between 1,600 and 1,900 Syrian civilians and around 500 members of the military are believed to have been killed in the Syrian government’s crackdown on the popular uprising, which is in its fifth month.
On his way out of Parliament following the session, Mikati told reporters that Lebanon’s position was based on the government’s policy to refrain from interfering in Syria’s internal affairs as well as the Cabinet’s conviction that the Security Council’s statement would fail to solve the crisis in Syria. “Lebanon’s position took into consideration the particularities of the country,” Mikati added. Separately, Lebanon’s stance sparked disapproving reactions by a number of lawmakers from the March 14 coalition who blasted it as shameful decision as it fails to support the Syrian people’s human rights.
However, MPs of the March 8 alliance defended Lebanon’s position, saying it was based on the Cabinet’s policy not to intervene in Syria’s internal affairs.
However, members of the country’s opposition described the government’s stance as shameful, saying that the country had failed to voice support for human rights.
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea criticized Lebanon’s decision at the U.N, saying, “We as Lebanese are not proud of Lebanon’s decision at the Security Council.”
“How is it in Lebanon’s interest when it disassociates itself from voters?” the LF leader asked.
Speaking to a local radio station, Geagea said that he did not believe a vote at the U.N. would have fallen “within the framework of interfering in Syria’s affairs.”
Chouf MP Mohammad Hajjar, a member of the Future parliamentary bloc, said that “the opposition had hoped that Lebanon would come out with a position that expresses the desires and aspirations of the majority of both the Lebanese and Syrian peoples, as well as Syrian people’s right to reject violence, oppression and injustice in order to live in dignity, freedom and democracy.”
“The March 14 alliance will issue an official stance on the Lebanese government’s position toward Syria’s bloody tyranny,” Hajjar told a local radio station.
Hajjar said the March 14 coalition, led by former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, would issue a response to the stance by Prime Minister Najib Mikati’s Cabinet on the events in Syria.
Hariri, who has made only a few public appearances since his government collapsed in January, condemned last week what he described as a “massacre” in the Syrian city of Hama and urged Arabs to break their silence on events in Syria.
Opposition and human rights groups estimate that between 1,600 and 1,900 civilians have been killed since March when protests began in a deadly crackdown launched by President Bashar Assad. Damascus blames “terrorist gangs” for the deaths and says the unrest in the country is part of a foreign conspiracy.
Beirut MP Nabil de Freij, also a member of Hariri’s Future parliamentary bloc, said Lebanon’s position was not unexpected.
“Lebanon’s stance was expected since the Lebanese government is one-sided and close to Syria,” de Freij said.
However, de Freij expressed his belief that the Cabinet’s stance “will not ignite problems with the opposition [March 14]” and ruled out it having any negative impact on Lebanon’s relations with the international community.
While Lebanon didn’t vote against the statement, Lebanon’s deputy U.N. Ambassador Caroline Ziade carried out an infrequently used procedure, disassociating the country from the statement after it was approved and read aloud at the council’s meeting.
Lawmakers in the Hezbollah-led March 8 camp expressed different views, stressing the need to stay out of Syria’s internal affairs.
Zahrani MP Michel Musa, a member of Speaker Nabih Berri’s parliamentary bloc, said “Lebanon has no interest in antagonizing Syria and, therefore, there is no interest in taking a position in the Security Council to condemn Syria, given the brotherly ties as well as political, security and economic agreements.”
Musa stressed “the need for Lebanon to distance itself from any internal conflict in Syria.”

Lebanon’s YouTube
Hazem al-Amin,/Now Lebanon
August 5, 2011
YouTube has so far scored three achievements in Lebanon. Or at least that’s what observers note. The latest such achievement is the pictures published on the site, showing the attack on Lebanese youths on Hamra Street as they tried to hold a protest in front of the Syrian Embassy. The pictures revealed the faces of the attackers, thus allowing us to confirm what Lebanese parties allied with the Syrian regime had been denying about themselves, namely that those people are not members in them. Prior to this achievement, YouTube had done well by showing us a Baath Party official attacking a pharmacy in Saida, saying foul words to a lady in it and trashing its contents.
The first achievement was smarter than the previous ones, since its strength is not only derived from the scene displayed in the video, but also from the idea of adding an ordinary violation that could be filmed anywhere to a package of other violations. A local magazine (Shou’oun Janoubiyya) took pictures of building contraventions in the South at a time when the South was witnessing a building frenzy. These pictures were displayed on YouTube in order to portray these contraventions as violations that are secretly filmed and broadcast on the site. The person who did this job wanted to portray those who violate public spaces and domains as resembling those who violate human rights and attack protesters in other YouTube videos. They are similar as proven by their presence on the same website.
A new expression went along with YouTube’s few achievements in Lebanon, namely using the word “shabiha” (or thugs) to describe those who attacked the youths on Hamra Street and broke their ribs. These are truly thugs and now we truly understand what Syrians mean by describing their attackers as thugs. We now know who their thugs and ours are. They are cowardly human beings who do not reveal their identities and whose parties would not acknowledge them as members even though they sent them on their missions. The ambiguity shrouding this phenomenon has been suddenly revealed. Thugs actually live in the vicinity of power and defend it, but power later kills them. They are faceless individuals even though their faces appeared on YouTube. They defend a power they are ashamed of and that is ashamed of them, hence the fact that they appear with no faces and no names.
Something has started in Lebanon in this respect. Indeed, YouTube corrupts and ruins powers, and power in our country is more fragile than powers, which YouTube speedily brought down. Let us imagine, for instance, that someone had took pictures of the Black Shirts who took to Beirut’s streets at dawn to change a political reality resulting from legislative elections that reflected the Lebanese people’s will as best as possible, and that these pictures had been displayed on YouTube.
Things would have been different had this happened. The Black Shirts’ strength is imaginary and lies in the mystery shrouding their deeds. Had this scene been filmed and displayed on YouTube, the violation would have been documented and brought closer to the Lebanese whose vote was targeted. The “Black Shirts” are no more immune than their fellows in other countries. Following the “Baath in Saida” movie, security forces arrested the perpetrator, knowing that the film was aired about a week following the incident during which time he remained free. This would probably have still been the case had the movie not been displayed. The embassy movie may not result in arresting the perpetrators, but it does reveal their faces.
This article is a translation, which was originally featured on the NOW Arabic site on Friday August 5, 2011

At Least 10 Dead as Thousands March against Assad in Syria
Naharnet/Syrian security forces killed at least 10 demonstrators on Friday as they opened fire to disperse protests near Damascus and in the central city of Homs, a human rights activist said, as thousands of Syrians took to the streets to rally against President Bashar al-Assad on the first Friday of Ramadan in support of the protest hub of Hama. "Seven people were killed in Irbin, another in Maadamiya (both towns near the capital) and two in Homs," Rami Abdul Rahman, head of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, told Agence France Presse by telephone, adding many others were wounded by gunfire.
Fellow activist Abdul Karim Rihawi, who heads the Syrian League for the Defense of Human Rights, said earlier five people were shot dead in Irbin but cautioned the toll was likely to rise due to sustained gunfire. Meanwhile, state news agency SANA said two members of the security forces were killed and eight wounded in an ambush on a road in the Idlib region of northwest Syria, near the Turkish border.
Gunmen posted on an apartment block rooftop in Douma, near Damascus, shot and wounded two other members of the security forces, it said, while assailants also opened fire in Homs.
Security forces used cluster ammunition in Douma, according to the head of the Britain-based Observatory.
Communications were completely cut off as the army stepped up an operation to crush dissent in Hama, north of Damascus, where security forces killed at least 30 civilians and wounded dozens more earlier in the week. "Thousands of demonstrators marched in Deir Ezzor, Daraa and Qamishli in support of the city of Hama despite the extreme heat," Rihawi said, adding that they numbered 30,000 in Deir Ezzor alone. Abdul Rahman said that "more than 12,000 people" also marched in Bench, in Idlib province, "to demand the fall of the regime and express their support for Hama and Deir Ezzor."
"Hundreds of people came out of the Al-Mans Uri mosque in Jableh, chanting 'God is with us,'" he told Agence France Presse.
The call for Friday's protests came from activists on Facebook group The Syrian Revolution 2011, a driving force behind the demonstrations calling for greater freedoms since mid-March.
The Assad regime has sought to crush the democracy movement with brutal force, killing more than 1,600 civilians and arresting thousands of dissenters, rights activists say.
Its latest crackdown has centered on Hama, where at least 30 people were killed on Wednesday by tanks shelling the city center.
The city was isolated on Friday, and the military continued an operation to combat what Assad's regime calls "armed terrorist gangs" responsible for the deadly unrest.
State media reported that army units were removing "roadblocks set up by terrorist groups that have blocked roads and damaged public and private property, including police stations, using various weapons."
The crackdown on Hama has prompted harsh words from Washington and Moscow, with Russia hinting at a possible change of heart after stonewalling firm U.N. action against Syria, its ally since Soviet times.
The White House said the deadly crackdown has put Syria and the Middle East on a "very dangerous path," as Washington extended a raft of recent sanctions to include a businessman close to Assad and his family. President Barack Obama's administration appeared to be moving toward a first direct call for Assad to go, a step it has so far resisted, following the escalation of violence in Hama. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would urge the Europeans, Arabs and others to do more to press Syria to stop its deadly crackdown.
Clinton said Assad's regime was responsible for the deaths of more than 2,000 people, repeating that Washington believes the embattled president has "lost his legitimacy to govern."
The U.S. Treasury Department froze the U.S. assets of Mohammed Hamsho and his company, Hamsho International Group, and prohibited U.S. entities from engaging in any business dealings with them.
Meanwhile, activists and analysts have dismissed as a ploy a new law allowing the creation of political parties alongside the Baath party, as decreed by Assad on Thursday.
The decree came after the U.N. Security Council condemned the crackdown and said those responsible should be held accountable, in a non-binding statement rather than a resolution.
Western powers had hoped for stronger action but were rebuffed by veto-wielding members Russia and China, who feared doing so would pave the way for another military intervention like the one in Libya. But Russian President Dmitry Medvedev spoke forcefully about the situation on Thursday and called on Assad to "carry out urgent reforms" warning otherwise "a sad fate awaits him and in the end we will have to take some decisions."
And Kuwait on Friday urged a halt to the crackdown, expressing its "extreme pain" and calling for dialogue and a political solution to allow for "true reforms that meet the demands of the Syrian people". Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said developments in Syria "are unacceptable.""Operations with heavy arms and tanks in densely populated residential areas like Hama are not legitimate at all," he was quoted by Anatolia news agency as saying.*Source Agence France Presse

Syria Brotherhood to Miqati: You're Bargaining on Your Political Future by Siding with Our Children Killers
Naharnet /Syria’s banned Muslim Brotherhood on Friday lashed out at Prime Minister Najib Miqati, accusing him of “siding with the killers of Syrian children.” In a statement published by the Italian news agency AKI, the Brotherhood’s official spokesman Zuheir Salem said “the Syrian people would never compromise, no matter the sacrifices, the blood of our brothers in Lebanon, whether in Tripoli, Beirut, Sidon … or anywhere in Lebanon.” On Wednesday, Lebanon disassociated itself from a U.N. Security Council presidential statement condemning Syria's crackdown on opposition protests. Normally the document is adopted unanimously. Lebanon did not block the adoption, but disavowed the document after. "Whatever affects Lebanon, affects Syria, whatever affects Syria will also affect Lebanon," Lebanon's deputy ambassador Caroline Ziade told the Security Council meeting. Describing Miqati as “the son of Tripoli,” the Brotherhood condemned the premier’s “siding with the perpetrators of genocide crimes against the Syrian people.” “We did not expect PM Miqati to bargain on the premiership with the blood of Syria’s children,” Salem said, adding that “through this deplorable and appalling stance, Miqati is bargaining on his political future and on the future of the relation between him and the Syrian and Lebanese people.” The Brotherhood also accused Miqati of being in the service of “those who are seeking to destroy Lebanon and Syria.”

Libya Rebels Say NATO Strike Kills Gadhafi Son, Regime Denies
Naharnet /Libya's rebel forces on Friday said a NATO strike killed Moammer Gadhafi's youngest son Khamis and 31 others in the disputed town of Zliten, in what would be a severe setback for Tripoli's military leadership. The claim was denied by government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim, who said "the news about the killing of Khamis by a NATO air strike are very dirty lies to cover the murder of civilians in the peaceful city." A rebel military spokesman said NATO had hit a military operations center overnight in the western town killing 32, including Khamis, a feared military commander. "Overnight there was an aircraft attack by NATO on the Gadhafi operations room in Zliten and there are around 32 Gadhafi troops killed. One of them is Khamis," Mohammed Zawawi, a spokesman for revolutionary militias, told Agence France Presse. Zawawi cited spies operating among Gadhafi's ranks and intercepted radio chatter as sources. There was no independent verification of Khamis's death, which has been rumored a number of times during Libya's five month-long civil war.
From the Naples headquarters of NATO's Libya operations an official confirmed the alliance's warplanes had hit at least two targets in Zliten overnight, but made no comment about the reports of Khamis's death. "We are aware of the news reports," the official told AFP.
"NATO struck an ammunition storage at around 8:15 pm (1815 GMT) in Zliten and a military police facility within a combat area at around 10:45 pm in the area of Zliten yesterday," he added. If confirmed Khamis's death would be a huge blow to both the regime's military and the morale of Gadhafi's inner circle.
The 28-year-old Khamis trained at a Russian military academy and commands the eponymous and much-feared Khamis Brigade -- one of the regime's toughest fighting units.
The brigade took part in the assault on the rebel enclave of Misrata, which has been bombarded from three sides and has seen some of the fiercest fighting of Libya's civil war.
Abdel Hafiz Ghoga, vice chairman of the rebels' de facto government, the National Transitional Council, told AFP Khamis's death would be a major victory.
"If his death is confirmed then the death of this tyrant is a victory for our revolution and our youth, especially in the west," he said.
The Zliten strike came just hours after the regime took journalists on an escorted tour of the center of Zliten, an effort to rubbish rebel claims the town was under attack.
Fighters from the rebel enclave of Misrata, 60 kilometers (37 miles) to the east, announced this week they had made progress in Zliten, a strategic coastal town on the road to Tripoli.
But authorities in Tripoli quickly denied that, saying they controlled the entire town.
On Thursday an AFP journalist saw the town center was in the hands of regime forces, although intensive artillery fire was heard in the distance.
Residents said the frontline is located at a distance of 10 to 15 kilometers (six to nine miles) east of the town center while rebel official said they control three eastern neighborhoods.
Meanwhile, state television reported that NATO warplanes struck Tripoli early on Friday, as the regime accused rebels of sabotaging a key pipeline feeding the country's sole functioning refinery. About 10 loud explosions rocked the Libyan capital around 1:30 am (2330 GMT), an AFP journalist said.
Shortly afterwards, Libyan television said "civilian and military sites" in the southeastern suburb of Khellat al-Ferjan had been targeted by "the colonialist aggressor."
Deputy Foreign Minister Khaled Kaaim said late Thursday that rebel forces had sabotaged a pipeline in the strategic Nafusa mountains, southeast of Tripoli.
"The rebels turned off a valve and poured cement over it," he said, adding that this would lead to a shortage of electricity in the capital as oil and gas were used at the Zawiyah refinery to generate power. Kaaim said food and medicine supplies were spoiling in the capital due to long power cuts. Tripoli residents complained Thursday of extensive blackouts and an acute shortage of gas canisters. **Source Agence France Presse

Medvedev Says Assad Risks 'Sad Fate' if He Fails to Reform
Naharnet /Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Thursday called the situation in Syria "dramatic" and expressed "enormous concern" over the deadly violence in the country.
"Unfortunately, people die there in large numbers. This arouses enormous concern from us," the Russian leader said in an interview given to Russian media in the southern resort Sochi.
Syria's President Bashar al-Assad needs to "carry out urgent reforms, come to terms with the opposition, restore peace and create a modern state," Medvedev said as quoted by the Interfax news agency.  "If he cannot do this, a sad fate awaits him, and in the end we will have to take some decision. We are watching the way the situation develops. As it changes, some of our perspectives also change." Medvedev's remarks follow a foreign ministry statement Monday strongly criticizing the government's crackdown on demonstrations in Syria in a sign of a shift in Russia's rigid position on the conflict in the U.N. Security Council. Russia together with China, both of which hold veto power in the U.N. Security Council, have persistently blocked a Western-drafted resolution on Syria to the irritation of other world powers. Moscow has repeatedly stressed that it was firmly opposed to foreign interference in Syria, its ally since Soviet times, and believed its regional ally could find a political solution to its crisis. **Source Agence France Presse

STL to Unveil New List of Suspects by End of August

Naharnet /The Special Tribunal for Lebanon probing the assassination of ex-Premier Rafik Hariri will take new procedures before the end of August, al-Liwaa newspaper reported on Friday. STL’s Prosecutor Daniel Bellemare obtained new information on the case, the daily said. It revealed that General Prosecutor Saeed Mirza contacted several Lebanese officials in the light of the new information. According to the newspaper, the STL is expected to release a new list of suspects in the assassination. Al-Liwaa remarked that the new measures will highlight other crimes executed in Lebanon. The tribunal will unveil links between the assassination of Hariri and mainly the assassination attempts of then Defense Minister Elias Murr on July 12, 2005 and MP Marwan Hamadeh on October 1, 2004. It added that there is information that links Hariri’s murder with the assassination of then Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel on November 21, 2006.

Gemayel Rejects Hizbullah Threats to Turn Arms Against its Foes
Naharnet /Phalange party leader Amin Gemayel warned Hizbullah on Friday against attempts to target the March 14-led opposition saying its project is doomed to failure.
“Hizbullah should be aware that its project is doomed to failure,” he said at the opening of the 29th Phalange conference. “We stress to Hizbullah that no one in Lebanon wants to target it but we don’t accept that it turns its arms against us.” He accused the Shiite party of adopting the security logic of Israel to preserve its existence. “What guarantees its presence is the logic of legitimacy, politics, coordination and openness.” “If Israel is adopting the logic of security against enemies, then Hizbullah is adopting it against the citizens of its nation,” Gemayel told the conference. He urged Hizbullah to unite with the Lebanese, saying “what guarantees the sustainability of Hizbullah is partnership with the Lebanese and not alliances” with regional countries.
Neither Christians nor Muslims will allow anyone to change Lebanon’s identity, the Phalange leader warned. He reiterated his call for Hizbullah to recognize the legitimacy of the Lebanese state, put its arms under the control of the Lebanese army and hand over the four suspects in ex-Premier Rafik Hariri’s Feb. 2005 murder case to the Lebanese authorities. “If the accused are saints then we wouldn’t have had martyrs,” Gemayel quipped. He stressed that his party backs the Special Tribunal for Lebanon because it believes in justice and wants stability.
Turning to President Michel Suleiman’s invitation for dialogue, the former president said: “Dialogue requires that all parties believe in the state of law and legitimate authorities.”
“The Phalange doesn’t reject dialogue,” he said, wondering “what benefits the dialogue would have, if they consider the arms sacred.”

Prisoners Relatives Block Airport, Akkar Roads over Demands
Naharnet /Dozens of relatives of Islamist prisoners detained in Lebanon's notorious main prison of Roumieh on Friday blocked the international highway linking the northern city of Tripoli to neighboring Akkar and the Syrian border, demanding the government to urgently “settle the cases of their detained relatives, who have been in jail for four years without a trial.”
The protesters called for “filling the vacancies in the Judicial Council panel, to which the Fouad Saniora government had referred dozens of cases following the al-Tal and al-Bohsas bomb attacks” against army troops. They stressed that a lot of detainees “have nothing to do whatsoever with the bomb attacks,” noting that “many of them should not be jailed for more than one or two years, in line with the verdicts issued last year by the Military Court in similar cases.” Meanwhile, relatives of other prisoners blocked the airport highway with burning tires to protest the parliament’s recent rejection of a bill on lowering prison year to nine months. Security forces managed later to reopen the road after dispersing the protesters, MTV reported.

Huge Blaze Breaks Out at Building in Salim Salam Area, Residents Flee on Fire Ladders
Naharnet/A huge fire broke out at around 6:00 am Friday in Souk al-Rawshi building at the Hawd al-Welaya-Salim Salam area of Beirut. Firefighters finally doused the blaze at midday.
In the morning, firefighters evacuated people from their apartments on an emergency fire ladder. The firefighters later brought in a new ladder that fits for 5 people at a time.
Several families fled to the rooftop of the 8-storey building which has 6-7 apartments on each floor. Sources told Naharnet that the blaze broke out in depots containing furniture and carpets. The residents weren’t able to flee from the building entrance because of the smoke. The fire caused a huge traffic jam on the Salim Salam highway in the morning rush hour. Security forces later closed the Salim Salam highway, blocking the traffic coming from the Mazraa area. The side linking downtown to Mazraa is still open.

Assassination Attempt on Palestinian Commander in Ain al-Hilweh

Naharnet /Two members of the Islamist Jund al-Sham group on Friday made an attempt on the life of the chief of Palestinian Armed Struggle in the Ain al-Hilweh refugee camp Mahmoud Issa, aka al-Lino, Voice of Lebanon Radio (93.3) reported. “While Palestinian national Mahmoud Abdul Qader and another Jund al-Sham member were planting a bomb near al-Lino’s house in the camp, they were spotted by the latter’s bodyguards, who shot and wounded the two,” the radio network added. Armed factions in the camp immediately went on alert, Voice of Lebanon said, adding that Palestinian intelligence agents and the Armed Struggle had opened a probe into the incident.

Maritime Border Law Awaits Decrees to Start Oil Exploration

Naharnet /Energy Minister Jebran Bassil described parliament’s adoption of a draft law on the delineation of Lebanon’s maritime border as an “achievement,” saying however, it was now time for the cabinet to issue decrees paving way for the exploration of oil and natural gas in the country’s Exclusive Economic Zone. Bassil told As Safir daily published Friday that Premier Najib Miqati’s government should commit to its policy statement and issue the decrees that would give licenses for international companies to explore oil.
The cabinet should also resolve its problem with Cyprus and work on rectifying Israel’s latest map, he said. Tensions rose last month after Israel's cabinet approved a map of the country's proposed maritime borders with Lebanon and submitted it to the U.N., which has been asked to mediate. The map conflicts with one submitted by Lebanon to the U.N. last year and that gives Israel less territory. Lebanon also challenges Israel's assertion that an accord signed in 2007 between Cyprus and Lebanon sets the same boundaries as those agreed between the Jewish state and Cyprus in 2010. The disputed zone consists of about 854 square kilometers, and important energy reserves there could generate billions of dollars.
An involved parliamentary source confirmed Bassil’s assertion that Lebanon should now negotiate with Syria and Cyprus, telling al-Liwaa newspaper that the country should also adopt a series of laws on fisheries, maritime environment and maritime activities of warships. Bassil vowed to refer to the cabinet all the decrees of his ministry on oil exploration as soon as the decree of the maritime border delineation is issued. It shouldn’t take more than ten days, he said.

Cyprus President Appoints New Cabinet

Naharnet /Cyprus' embattled president reshuffled his 11-member cabinet on Friday, in an attempt to combat a political and economic crisis spawned by a deadly blast that wrecked the island's main power station and sapped confidence in the government. President Dimitris Christofias appointed longtime ally and former communications minister Kikis Kazamias to the key finance ministry post. Kazamias, who has also served on the European Court of Auditors, has his work cut out for him to shore up public finances amid growing speculation that the EU member country may be forced to seek a bailout. The island's €17.4 billion ($24.76 billion) economy has already been shaken by a string of credit rating agency downgrades mainly because of the banking sector's large exposure to crisis-afflicted Greece. But the detonation of dozens of seized containers packed with Iranian munitions at a naval base last month — that killed 13 people and cut the island's power supply by half — is pushing the economy to the brink. So far, EU officials say there are no plans for any Cyprus bailout. But a University of Cyprus study released this week said the economy will contract by 2.4 percent of gross domestic product this year and push unemployment up by a percentage point. The EU had projected growth of 1.5 percent of GDP for Cyprus this year. Boding well for Kazamias are signs that after much wrangling, the island's powerful trade unions are falling in line with calls for bigger cost cuts, especially in the public sector that takes up more than a quarter of all government spending. Negotiations on a package of spending cuts and tax hikes are expected to wrap up by the middle of next week. Career diplomat Erato Kozakou-Marcoullis moves over from the communications ministry to foreign affairs which she headed briefly in the previous administration. She takes over from Markos Kyprianou who resigned in the wake of the explosion which many Cypriots saw as a result of official negligence. The defense minister also quit after the blast and Christofias has rebuffed calls for his own resignation. Christofias' woes were compounded this week when Kyprianou's center-right DIKO party walked out of the ruling coalition, citing strong disagreements over the president's handling of talks with breakaway Turkish Cypriots to reunify the divided island.
The move left Christofias with only the backing of his communist-rooted party AKEL which holds 19 of the 56 parliamentary seats, hobbling his ability to pass legislation for the remaining 18 months of his five-year tenure. However, opposition parties have indicated they would throw their support behind legislation aimed at saving the economy from ruin.
Interior Minister Neoklis Sylikiotis keeps his portfolio, as does Justice Minister Loucas Louca and Labor Minister Sotiroulla Charalambous. Agriculture Minister Demetris Eliades shifts to Defense. New faces include Giorgos Demosthenous, Efthymios Flourentzos, Praxoulla Antoniadou, Stavros Malas and Sofoklis Aletraris who take over the education, communications, commerce, health and agriculture ministries respectively.**Source Agence France Presse

Turkey Says Syrian Violence Unacceptable

Naharnet /Turkey said Friday the Syrian regime's deadly crackdown on civilian protestors is "unacceptable" and "illegitimate", Anatolia news agency reported."The developments in Syria as I emphasized before are unacceptable," Anatolia quoted Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu as saying. "Operations with heavy arms and tanks in densely-populated residential areas like Hama are not legitimate at all," Davutoglu told reporters as he left a mosque after the Friday prayer in Ankara. "Syria should take the messages from Turkey and the international community very seriously and put an end to this violent environment as soon as possible," he said. The regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has sought to crush weeks of protests with brutal force, killing more than 1,600 civilians and arresting thousands of dissenters, rights activists say. Its latest crackdown has centered on the flashpoint protest hub of Hama, north of Damascus, where at least 30 people were reported killed on Wednesday by tanks shelling the city center. Ankara, whose ties with Damascus have flourished in recent years, has stepped up pressure on Assad to initiate reform but has stopped short of calling for his departure. But Turkey is showing mounting frustration with his foot-dragging on reform.
*Source Agence France Presse

Cracks in the armor of the Resistance?

By: Nadine Elali and Shane Farrell, August 5, 2011
Now Lebanon
An explosion in the Hezbollah-controlled area of Dahiyeh last week gave birth to a host of speculation. Initially brushed off as a gas canister explosion by Hezbollah’s media relations department, which also stated that no one was injured, suspicions were raised by heightened security measures taken in the aftermath of the blast.
Hezbollah members reportedly forbade locals from loitering in the area and repaired the apartment where the blast took place in the immediate aftermath of the explosion.
Meanwhile Lockman Slim, founder of NGO Hayya Bina and a Dahiyeh resident, told NOW Lebanon that “phones were no longer working in the area.”
An-Nahar reported that the explosion, which was in the Rweissat neighborhood, was caused by either a bomb or grenade. News reports speculated that Samir Kuntar, a former prisoner in Israel who returned to Lebanon during a prisoner exchange between Hezbollah and the Jewish State in 2008, was the target of the blast.
Israel’s Channel 10, meanwhile, said the blast targeted Mustapha Mughniyeh, the son of slain Hezbollah military commander Imad Mughniyeh, at his office and that his bodyguard was killed by the explosion.
While the nature of the incident remains a mystery, Hezbollah members cordoned off the area around the apartment where the blast took place, preventing people—including Lebanese security officials—from gaining access to the building, and residents have reported a heightened level of security in the neighborhood.
Journalist Mustapha Fahs told NOW Lebanon that there have been immense security procedures implemented in Dahiyeh recently, including patrols and police dogs. According to Slim, the levels of nightly deployment in the area have reached levels unprecedented since the 2006 war with Israel.
This has come at the back of a sharp rise in security within Dahiyeh following allegations of Hezbollah members spying for the US Central Intelligence Agency. Hezbollah reportedly arrested more than 50 members, including three sons of high-ranking commanders, on suspicion of treason, and some have been transferred to Tehran for questioning.
The organization reportedly suspects they were involved in the assassination of Imad Mughniyeh in 2008 and that they supported the anti-government protests in Iran.
Some feel that these latest two incidents are evidence that Hezbollah does not exert complete control over Dahiyeh and is a blow for the image it seeks to portray.
“For me the most important issue [surrounding the] explosion is that Dahiyeh is not as [secure] a stronghold as Hezbollah tries to describe,” said Slim. “It is an image that was breached.”
Fahs believes that this is nothing new, and that there is already “chaos on the level of social security, [including] thefts, drugs and abuse by thugs among each other in Dahiyeh itself,” which, he said, is damaging to the party since “it reflects that Hezbollah does not have control over its own area and its own security.”
A Dahiyeh resident who spoke on condition of anonymity, on the other hand, believes that moderates, intellectuals and opponents of Hezbollah are reading into the events. He believes that the views of Hezbollah supporters have not changed.
Ali al-Amin, a journalist at al-Balad newspaper, put forward another explanation. “In the party itself,” he said, “there may be a group of a different political vision than the prevalent one, reflecting also the different visions currently present in Iran: one in favor of some settlement with the US and another against. So the two events may be a matter of settling accounts, to face this group and get rid of it, and what other way to do it then refer to it as treachery.”
However due to Hezbollah’s intense secrecy, Amin said that no one really knows the true answer.
He added, though, that the party is being severely tested by local and regional events. At a national level, people are anxious about the indictments of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon and what it will mean for the party and its four named members.
Internally, as a party in power, Hezbollah is now more accountable to the people and cannot blame March 14 for government failures. Externally, with the uncertainty in Syria, people are worried about how events there will affect the Party of God. He said the party is trying to control the first two factors, but is severely challenged by the third, which is out of its control.
“I believe that Hezbollah is currently going through the toughest phase of its existence,” he added.

Preventing Civil War in Syria
By Elliott Abrams/Wall Street Journal
Syria remains rocked by anti regime protests that have endured since March, and the country may be headed for civil war. That's because unlike in Egypt or Tunisia, sectarian rivalries are central to Syrian politics. That adds an element of danger to the situation—but also points the way toward how dictator Bashar al-Assad may fall, especially if the West takes the proper initiative.
Syria's population is 74% Sunni Muslim. Yet the Assad regime is Alawite, an offshoot of Shiite Islam—often considered heretical by orthodox Sunnis—that comprises only 10% or 15% of Syrians. The best-armed and best-trained divisions of the Syrian army are Alawite.
As President Assad has cracked down on protesters with violent force, killing roughly 2,000, Washington's reaction has been slow and unsteady. On May 19, President Obama called for a "serious dialogue" between the regime and the protesters in a speech at the State Department. Yet on July 31, he said "the courageous Syrian people who have demonstrated in the streets will determine its future." Which is it? U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford's July visit to the city of Hama—where he was received by the crowds with bouquets of flowers—is a reminder that U.S. actions remain critically important to any chance of a less violent outcome.
There appears to be no U.S. strategy except prayers that Syria doesn't turn into Libya: a full-fledged civil war. With the NATO military action in Libya now a source of contention both in the U.S. and among NATO allies, the last thing the White House likely wants is increased violence in Syria. Washington's inaction would then make it appear callous and inept—and could eventually lead to calls for a no-fly zone, arming the rebels, or even some form of military intervention.
American leadership can help avoid civil war. Our goal should be to separate the Assad family and its closest cronies from the rest of the Alawite community.
Across Alawite society there are varying degrees of loyalty to the Assads. There are close supporters who know their fate is tied to that of Assad, but there are many others who care little about the ruling family but are paralyzed by fear of vengeance against the entire community after President Assad is gone. The Alawite generals in the Syrian Army should be key targets for a campaign of psychological warfare urging them to salvage their community's post-Assad future by refusing now to kill their fellow citizens. The U.S. should address them publicly, but also reach out to them privately through whatever intelligence or military channels are available.
Here the Turkish government may be able to help, for they turned against Assad even before the U.S. did. The Turks were pursuing their own interests, seeking to displace Iran as the outside power most influential in Syria. But they also don't want to see a Syrian civil war that could, among other things, produce a massive refugee flow across their borders. Messages from Turkish officials to the Alawite military establishment can help persuade them not to sacrifice their future in a vain effort to save the Assad mafia. The message, and the tougher it is the better: "Make your choice now. Are you going to be war criminals or survivors?"
For this to work, the U.S. should stop speaking about "the regime" and speak instead about "the Assads." We should end the American equivocation and say clearly that Assad must and will go. The Alawites, and the generals in particular, won't think hard about their place in Syria's future until they are convinced Assad is finished.
For this reason, Ambassador Ford should be recalled now, to demonstrate a final break with the Assads, or he should be deployed repeatedly, as he was in Hama, to symbolize America's support for the opposition. For the same reason the U.S. should be far more active in turning Assad and his closest supporters into international pariahs, using whatever multilateral bodies are available and employing far sharper presidential rhetoric than we have yet seen. Assad and his family should be offered one last chance to get out now before the wheels start turning that will make him an international outlaw forever.
Second, we should put far more pressure on the Syrian business community—Sunni, Christian and Alawite—so that it increasingly sees the Assads as a bottomless drain on the nation, not a bulwark against chaos. This means working harder to get international cooperation on additional sanctions that would hit Syrian imports and exports, rather than targeting only the finances of a few top officials close to Assad.
Finally, the U.S. should be pressing the Syrian opposition—the traditional leadership inside the country (at least those still out of prison), and the new groups such as those that met recently in Turkey—to state with greater clarity their commitment to civil peace when the Assads are gone. They should pledge that post-Assad Syria will protect all minorities—the Alawites, Kurds and the very nervous Christian communities. They should agree now to an international role in providing these protections and guarantees. The more detailed these pledges are, and the more publicity and international support they get, the more good they will do inside Syria.
But for all the justified focus on Syria, the single event that would most help bring down the Assads would be the fall of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. It still isn't clear today if the lesson of the Arab Spring is that dictators are doomed or that dictators willing to shoot peaceful protesters can win. Once Gadhafi goes, the oxygen Libya is sucking from the Arab struggle for democracy will circulate again. The NATO effort—however poorly implemented—will have finally been a success, and threats of possible military action to protect civilians, especially refugees, will have some credibility.
Meantime, much can be done to avoid a sectarian war in Syria if the Assad mafia can be separated from much of its own sectarian support. We can use our voice and influence to persuade Syria's minorities that they have a secure future after Assad is gone—and help all of Syria's communities agree on the rules for the post-Assad era that is coming.
**Mr. Abrams, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, handled Middle East affairs at the National Security Council from 2001 to 2009.