LCCC
ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February
21/2010
Bible Of the
Day
Luke 18/10-14: "He spoke also this parable to certain people who were convinced
of their own righteousness, and who despised all others. 18:10 “Two men went up
into the temple to pray; one was a Pharisee, and the other was a tax collector.
18:11 The Pharisee stood and prayed to himself like this: ‘God, I thank you,
that I am not like the rest of men, extortioners, unrighteous, adulterers, or
even like this tax collector. 18:12 I fast twice a week. I give tithes of all
that I get.’ 18:13 But the tax collector, standing far away, wouldn’t even lift
up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a
sinner!’ 18:14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than
the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles
himself will be exalted.”
Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special
Reports
Amends over Sadr may redeem Libya/The daily Star/February
20/10
Israel-Hizbullah diatribes reinforce deterrence/By
Michael Bluhm/February
20/10
Latest News Reports From
Miscellaneous Sources for February 20/10
Hariri
Meets Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican
/Naharnet
Protest
in Front of Chamoun Family Burial Ground Prevents Aoun from Laying Wreaths
/Naharnet
Aoun after Meeting Jumblat: If
Church Bells were in Mukhtara, He Would've Showed Them to Me
/Naharnet
Jumblat:
We Achieved Reconciliation in 2001 Together with Patriarch Sfeir, I Urge New
Generation Not to Fall a Victim to Game of Nations
/Naharnet
Qassem: We Won't Be Shaken
by Objections on the Resistance Because We're the Majority
/Naharnet
US State Department lifts travel warning for Syria/Washington
Post
Sleiman to seek power boost if
reforms freeze/Daily Star
Hizbullah member admits to killing
army officer in 2008/Daily Star
Arab League chief warns Israeli
war on Lebanon still possible/Daily Star
Beirut outraged as Israelis cut
tree on Lebanese soil/Daily Star
Israel-Hizbullah diatribes
reinforce deterrence/Daily Star
Media reports indicate 'pilot
error' behind plane crash/Daily Star
Hariri calls for religious
co-existence/Daily Star
Ahmadinejad
and Nasrallah prepare us for war/Al-Arabiya
Obama warms up to Syria/New
York Post (blog)
LEBANON: First-ever joint Muslim-Christian holiday
celebrates Virgin Mary/Los
Angeles Times (blog)
French week in Lebanon 2010' to be held at BIEL/Daily
Star
Beirut hotel-occupancy rate at 73 percent - Ernst &
Young/Daily Star
Lebanon big winner in annual
journalism awards/Daily Star
Hariri urges cooperation in Ain al-Hilweh/Daily Star
Beachside kissing draws ire of
Sidon conservatives/Daily
Star
MP says 'green card' can solve
women's nationality dilemma/Daily
Star
Women more likely to vote in spite of poor representation/Daily Star
I would like to share with you this piece that explains the doctrine of fasting
Elias Bejjani
what does the Bible say?"
Answer: Scripture does not command Christians to fast. God does not require or
demand it of Christians. At the same time, the Bible presents fasting as
something that is good, profitable, and beneficial. The book of Acts records
believers fasting before they made important decisions (Acts 13:4; 14:23).
Fasting and prayer are often linked together (Luke 2:37; 5:33). Too often, the
focus of fasting is on the lack of food. Instead, the purpose of fasting should
be to take your eyes off the things of this world to focus completely on God.
Fasting is a way to demonstrate to God, and to ourselves, that we are serious
about our relationship with Him. Fasting helps us gain a new perspective and a
renewed reliance upon God. Although fasting in Scripture is almost always a
fasting from food, there are other ways to fast. Anything given up temporarily
in order to focus all our attention on God can be considered a fast (1
Corinthians 7:1-5). Fasting should be limited to a set time, especially when
fasting from food. Extended periods of time without eating can be harmful to the
body. Fasting is not intended to punish the flesh, but to redirect attention to
God. Fasting should not be considered a “dieting method” either. The purpose of
a biblical fast is not to lose weight, but rather to gain deeper fellowship with
God. Anyone can fast, but some may not be able to fast from food (diabetics, for
example). Everyone can temporarily give up something in order to draw closer to
God. By taking our eyes off the things of this world, we can more successfully
turn our attention to Christ. Fasting is not a way to get God to do what we
want. Fasting changes us, not God. Fasting is not a way to appear more spiritual
than others. Fasting is to be done in a spirit of humility and a joyful
attitude. Matthew 6:16-18 declares, “When you fast, do not look somber as the
hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting. I
tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you fast,
put oil on your head and wash your face, so that it will not be obvious to men
that you are fasting, but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father,
who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Qassem: We Won't Be Shaken by Objections on the Resistance
Because We're the Majority
Hizbullah Deputy Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem on Friday stressed that
Hizbullah will not be affected by some objections on its armed resistance, as he
refused to discuss Lebanon's defensive strategy "through the media." "We won't
be shaken by the objections of some sides on the resistance because we represent
a substantive majority among the Lebanese people," Qassem stressed at a
Hizbullah educational conference. "Lately, we have seen that all political
forces, from both camps of the majority and the opposition, have gathered again
around the resistance," he added. "The resistance is a demand and, God willing,
it will go on."Qassem vowed to those who want to know the future of Hizbullah's
resistance "to make it stronger and stronger and stronger until Israel fails to
just think of attacking Lebanon." "If some want to discuss the defensive
strategy through media outlets, we tell them that we will hear their screaming
without answering them." "A reasonable defensive strategy requires calm sessions
rather than 'acrobatic' media statements," he added.
Hizbullah number two stressed that "the resistance managed to refute the Israeli
deterrence force motto in 2006."
"If we were raising the issue of resistance as a mere idea, we would've listened
to theories on the possibility of achieving certain gains through the resistance
or not, but we are before a resistance that has accomplished a liberation and a
victory."
Qassem described diplomacy as the tool of the strong nations to dictate the
policies of the weak nations as opposed to armed resistance which allows
self-determination and "dignity."
On the other hand, Qassem said that "European passport holders may represent a
threat to Lebanon, which requires special measures to protect the Lebanese
people."
Qassem was referring to last month's murder in Dubai of Hamas top military
commander Mahmoud Mabhouh.
The Dubai police said they were hunting 11 agents with European passports for
Mabhouh's murder.
Four European countries whose passports were implicated in the case have piled
pressure on Israel, as Dubai said it wanted Mossad's chief arrested if his spies
were behind the hit.
Britain, Ireland, France and Germany on Thursday called in Israeli envoys for
talks at their foreign ministries on the killing, widely suspected to be the
work of the Israeli spy agency using false passports. At the same time Interpol
issued arrest notices for 11 suspects -- six listed with British passports,
three Irish, one French and one German -- wanted by Dubai for the killing of
Mabhouh in the emirate. Beirut, 19 Feb 10, 21:45
Hariri Meets Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican'
Naharnet/Prime Minister Saad Hariri met Saturday with Pope Benedict XVI in the
Vatican to discuss the situations in Lebanon and the Middle East.
Hariri then held a meeting with Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican Secretary
of State, and Monsignor Dominique Mamberti, Secretary for Relations with States
of the Holy See. Vatican sources revealed to al-Liwaa Lebanese daily that "the
pope considers the visit as an occasion to express support for the moderate
policy adopted by PM Hariri, which is a continuation for the approach of his
father (slain premier Rafik Hariri) in stressing coexistence between Muslims and
Christians and well-establishing the pillars of Lebanon – the unique country of
the Middle East." Hariri arrived to Rome Friday afternoon accompanied by his
wife Lara, his office's director Nader Hariri, and Advisors Mohammed Shatah,
Daoud al-Sayegh, and Hani Hammoud. The delegation was joined by Lebanese
Ambassador to the Vatican George Khoury. On Friday, Hariri urged Italy to play a
major role in pressuring Israel and drawing its attention to the importance of
peace negotiations, stressing that "Arabs want peace" while Israel "only wants
war on Lebanon, Syria and Iran.""Israel can't claim to be interested in the
peace process without doing anything tangible in this regard," Hariri said in an
interview with RAI News 24 Italian channel on Friday. He reiterated the
cooperation of the Lebanese government with UNIFIL forces in implementing U.N.
Security Council Resolution 1701. Answering a question about his upcoming
meeting with Pope Benedict XVI on Saturday, Hariri said: "Meeting with the pope
has great significance because Lebanon in the homeland of major Christian sects
that we want to preserve."
"We want to safeguard them and we want them to remain deep-rooted in Lebanon so
that Lebanon remains a global exemplar of coexistence," he added.
As to his upcoming meeting with Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi on Saturday, Hariri
said: "Italy has 2,500 soldiers in Lebanon serving within UNIFIL and General
(Claudio) Graziano was the commander of this U.N. force and he performed an
outstanding job during his mandate. I will thank Italy and its premier because
we also want to keep the number of (UNIFIL) troops in Lebanon unchanged."
Beirut, 20 Feb 10, 10:16
Protest in Front of Chamoun's Family Cemetery
Naharnet/Ground Prevents Aoun from Laying Wreaths
Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun on Saturday substituted his
commemoration visit to the Chamoun Family Cemetery
Ground by laying wreaths at the monument of Mount Lebanon's martyrs at
Deir al-Qamar's al-Talleh church yard. The protest of MP Doury Chamoun's
supporters in front of the burial ground prevented Aoun from reaching the place.
"In a spontaneous move, and to prevent desecration against the soil of those who
fell as martyrs defending the Lebanon of freedom, sovereignty, and independence,
hundreds of Chamounists from the Chouf area have gathered since the morning
hours in front of the Chamoun Family Burial Ground to protest the provocative
visit MP Michel Aoun intends to make to the tombs of (late) President Kamil
Chamoun and Martyr Leader Dani Chamoun," the National Liberal Party said in a
statement.
In a phone interview with LBC TV network, MP Doury Chamoun said: "Enough abuse
of martyrs … General Aoun should have visited (Deir al-Qamar) when he first
returned from exile.""With such actions, he is trying to market himself again
for the presidency while he ended after his decision to 'trade' with St. Maroun,"
Chamoun added. Beirut, 20 Feb 10, 15:08
Aoun after Meeting Jumblat: If Church Bells were in Mukhtara, He Would've Showed
Them to Me
Naharnet/Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun on Saturday described his
meeting in Mukhtara with Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat as
"exceptional," adding that his visit to the Chouf region aims "to establish
peace in Mount Lebanon." "Competition will always be a part of our political
life because without the right of diversity in politics, there is no democracy,"
Aoun said at a press conference alongside Jumblat after the meeting. Answering a
question, Aoun said: "If church bells existed in Mukhtara, Jumblat would've
showed them to me." For his part, Jumblat said: "This is a meeting for
deep-rooting reconciliation, openness, and peace. Together with MP Aoun, we have
to bequeath peace and coexistence to the coming generations."Aoun placed a
wreath of flowers at Kamal Jumblat's tomb before meeting with MP Jumblat.
After their meeting, Aoun and Jumblat headed to Beiteddine to deliver speeches
before a popular rally at the town's Maronite Archbishopric.
"Today's gathering is that of reconciliation and openness in order to teach the
coming generations not to fall as a victim for the game of nations, which almost
destroyed the unity of Mount Lebanon. But today, the unity of Mount Lebanon
becomes complete with Aoun's presence," Jumblat said in his speech.
For his part, Aoun said: "Today, our gathering is historical while aiming at
treating a historical issue through refreshing the memory and facing the facts.
Civil wars can't be erased except by a courageous act that surpasses
conventional treatments."
"European peoples managed to triumph over their pains and grieves, to face the
truth, and to overcome their civil wars. We should realize that civil war is a
destiny that we create with our own hands and not an imposed act of fate," he
added. Aoun stressed that the Lebanese are capable of thwarting the tragedies of
civil war if they avoid the grave mistakes they commit against each other.
"Today, there is a period of calm and we have to think of a new approach; and to
restructure our political reasoning and relations. The suffering of the Lebanese
people today is a result of the culture of seclusion and isolationism." "To
restore the collective memory and to clear our conscience, I call on all of our
citizens in Mount Lebanon and all areas to erect a memorial monument that
carries the martyrs' names wherever they fell and however they fell," Aoun
suggested.
"The courage of asking martyrs for forgiveness is a criteria for the ability to
live in a secure society … and this is the challenge, let us rise to it before
ourselves and the world."
Earlier Saturday, Aoun stressed the importance of Mount Lebanon's unity, adding
that Druze-Christian unity is what stands for this unity rather than the
internal accord of each sect alone.
"This visit to Chouf is addressed to all of the Chouf residents, Christians and
Druze, so that we restore harmony in Mount Lebanon," Aoun said in a speech at
Deir al-Qamar's al-Talleh Church. "We don't come to Chouf to hold a political
ceremony … but to end a phase and start another as well as a new approach," he
added.
Aoun stressed that "the martyrdom of Dani Chamoun was for the sake of Lebanon
and the sovereignty of the nation."
He started his visit to Chouf by laying wreaths at the Martyrs' Monument in Deir
al-Qamar.
Beirut, 20 Feb 10, 19:02
Jumblat: We Achieved Reconciliation in 2001 Together with Patriarch Sfeir, I
Urge New Generation Not to Fall a Victim to Game of Nations
Naharnet/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat on Saturday
stressed that the chapter of reconciliation was opened "in 2001 when the general
(Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun) was still in exile and his
supporters being beaten and arrested; and when they tried to defuse the
reconciliation," adding that "the defiance of the Lebanese people and FPM
supporters was stronger." In a speech at Beiteddine Maronite Archbishopric,
Jumblat said: "Reconciliation happened despite all obstacles … together with
(Maronite) Patriarch (Nasrallah) Sfeir – the sponsor of reconciliation, peace,
dialogue, and independence.""Today's gathering is that of reconciliation and
frankness in order to teach the coming generations not to fall as a victim for
the game of nations, which almost destroyed the unity of Mount Lebanon. But
today, the unity of Mount Lebanon becomes complete with Aoun's presence," he
added. Beirut, 20 Feb 10, 17:56
Aoun visit to Chamoun family cemetery cancelled
Date: February 20th, 2010
Source: NNA
Informed sources reported Saturday that Change and Reform parliamentary bloc head MP Michel Aoun cancelled his visit to Chamoun family cemetery, reported NNA.
National Liberal Party secretariat announced earlier today that hundreds of Chouf citizens gathered in front of the cemetery to protest Aoun’s “provocative” visit.
NLP head MP Dori Chamoun told al-Liwaa daily that Chamoun family rebuffs the visit, wondering about the reasons behind head of the Free Patriotic Movement Aoun’s visit after five years from returning from his exile in Paris. He indicated that he received an invitation from Bishop Elias Nassar to attend Beit el-Din gathering hosted by Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt today, but refused to attend. Concerning talks that Aoun’s visit to Chouf to attend MP Jumblatt’s lunch banquet is to re-open the displaced issue, Chamoun pointed that his party was the first to start a new manner of handling the issue with Democratic Gathering head MP jumblatt “to continue national reconciliation culminated by Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir’s visit to Mount Lebanon in 2001.”
Chamoun rebuffs Aoun visit to family cemetry
Date: February 20th, 2010/Source: al-Liwaa daily
National Liberal Party leader Dori Chamoun asserted that his family rebuffs MP Michel Aoun’s visit to Chamoun cemetery, reported al-Liwaa daily on Saturday. MP Chamoun wondered about the reasons head of the Free Patriotic Movement Aoun’s visit after five years from returning from his exile in Paris. He indicated that he received an invitation from Bishop Elias Nassar to attend Beit el-Din gathering hosted by Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt today, but refused to attend. Concerning talks that Aoun’s visit to Chouf to attend MP Jumblatt’s lunch banquet is to re-open the displaced issue, Chamoun pointed that his party was the first to start a new manner of handling the issue with Democratic Gathering head MP jumblatt “to continue national reconciliation culminated by Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir’s visit to Mount Lebanon in 2001.”In 2001, Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Butros Sfeir began a historic visit to the Chouf, a stronghold of the Druze community. Sfeir’s visit was considered “reconciliation” between the Maronite and Druze communities. However, almost nine years after the patriarch’s foray and meeting with Jumblatt, a number of Christian villages, namely Shahar and Brih, remain deserted from their Christian inhabitants.
Hizbullah member admits to killing army officer in 2008
By Youssef Diab /Daily Star staff
Saturday, February 20, 2010
BEIRUT: A member of Hizbullah admitted during a court hearing on Friday to
accidentally killing a Lebanese Army officer in 2008. The confession came during
a hearing at the Military Tribunal in the case of Hizbullah member Mustafa
Hassan Moqaddam, who is suspected of firing gunshots at a Lebanese Army
helicopter on August 28, 2008, and unintentionally killing its pilot, First
Lieutenant Samer Hanna.
Moqaddam confessed during questioning that he had fired at the helicopter after
it landed on a hill near a Hizbullah post in Tellet Sojod in south Lebanon. He
said he hadn’t seen the aircraft’s Lebanese flag and had thought it to be
Israeli, adding that he had heard other gunshots fired at the helicopter from a
different location.
Hanna’s colleague First Lieutenant Mahmoud Abboud was with him at the time of
the incident and told the tribunal that the two men had been on a training
mission, and that they had used the site for training several times in the past.
“In two weeks we landed there four times without a problem,” Abboud said.
He added that after the shooting, several armed men appeared and confiscated his
cell phone. Abboud said he saw no buildings indicating an open Hizbullah
presence in the area, but only “covered” structures.
The tribunal also listened to the testimony of Colonel Roger Helou, the
commander of the Air Force, who said the army chose the location after Israel
withdrew from it in order to train soldiers working in the south.
Helou added that army personnel headed to the site after losing contact with the
helicopter, and that he saw a “troubled and confused man surrounded by many
people who were trying to calm him down.”
The former head of the Army Intelligence office in Jezzine, Colonel Adnan Gheith,
said a Hizbullah member had told him two days before the incident that the area
was a Hizbullah military zone. – The Daily Star
Arab League chief warns Israeli war on Lebanon still possible
By Elias Sakr
/Daily Star staff
Saturday, February 20, 2010
BEIRUT: Arab League chief Amr Moussa isn’t ruling out the possibility of an
Israeli war against Lebanon, as he stressed that potential scenarios should be
taken into consideration in order to protect the country.
“The possibility of Israel launching an offensive against Lebanon stands, as we
should take into considerations all potential scenarios in order to protect
Lebanon and stand by its side,” Moussa told reporters at a news conference at
Rafik Hariri International Airport before his return to Cairo.
Moussa said his talks with Lebanese officials were very positive and tackled
inter-Arab ties, Israeli threats and the Iranian situation.
Asked about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s calls to President Michel
Sleiman and Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, urging them to be ready in
case of Israeli aggression to wipe out Israel’s existence, Moussa declined to
comment, stating that “he was not contacted [by Ahmadinejad] personally.”
Moussa also highlighted solidarity among Lebanese Cabinet members, adding that
Lebanon is in a much better political situation than three years ago, when
political stalemate governed the domestic scene.
As a non-permanent UN Security Council member for the next two years, Lebanon is
expected to find itself in a controversial position when it comes to voting on
sanctions to be imposed on Tehran over its nuclear program.
Israel and Hizbullah have been recently exchanging threats and counterthreats,
with Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu warning that all of Lebanon would be a
target for potential Israeli attacks, given the resistance’s participation in
the government.
Nasrallah warned earlier this week in strong language against aggression against
Lebanon, saying any attacks on Lebanese infrastructure would be met with
reprisals on Israeli facilities.
Moussa’s visit to Lebanon came ahead of next month’s Arab League summit in
Libya, which instigated debate among domestic political parties over Lebanon’s
participation.
Moussa reiterated that Lebanon would definitely take part, but that discussions
among Lebanese officials were still ongoing in order to decide on the level of
representation, due to Libya’s believed involvement in the 1978 disappearance of
Imam Musa al-Sadr.
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi has been implicated in the disappearance of Sadr,
the Iranian-born Shiite cleric who founded the Movement of the Deprived (Amal)
in Lebanon, and disappeared along with two companions after departing for
Tripoli to meet with government officials.
Moussa said the Sadr issue couldn’t be resolved through the media.
Meanwhile, the vice president of the Higher Shiite Council, Sheikh Abdel-Amir
Qabalan, said on Friday that Lebanon or Syria’s participation in the summit
would be a catastrophe.
“You came to demand from our government to participate in the summit,” Qabalan
said during Friday prayers, in a response to Moussa’s visit to Lebanon. “But why
don’t you call for an Arab Summit to resolve the issue of Imam Sadr’s
disappearance before demanding our participation?” Qabalan asked.
“Lebanon’s only condition for participating in the summit, irrespective of the
level of representation, is that the issue of Sadr be discussed publicly in the
opening session and before the media,” Qabalan added.
He also called on Arab leaders to defend Sadr’s case and urge Gadhafi to reveal
his fate. On Wednesday, Speaker Nabih Berri, the head of Amal, said Beirut
should not send a delegation to the Arab Summit since Tripoli was fueling
numerous crises “from Chad to Darfur.”
Sleiman to seek power boost if reforms freeze
By The Daily Star
Saturday, February 20, 2010
BEIRUT: President Michel Sleiman said he would demand a boost to his posts’
prerogatives when he becomes incapable of enforcing new reforms.
“Whenever I feel I am no longer capable of achieving new reforms I will raise my
voice with regard to the president’s prerogatives,” Sleiman said in remarks to
be published by the daily al-Balad Saturday.
Sleiman added that although he was selected as a consensus choice for president,
he would not alter his convictions “but rather convince others to do so.”
He also said that sessions of national dialogue to cover thorny issues would
soon resume, “although deciding on its timing would require efforts.”
Sleiman highlighted that the pressing issue of Palestinian weapons outside
refugee camps should be resolved first and should be followed by the issue of
arms inside camps.
Sleiman’s statements come in the wake of Cabinet’s decision to endorse
proportional representation. A round of municipal elections, scheduled for June,
will be the first test of the new electoral system.
Politicians have been reacting positively to the new electoral system. Tripoli
MP Samir Jisr said Friday that the principle of proportional representation
allowed for the representation of all parties and should be implemented in all
districts.
Similarly, MP Antoine Zahra, a member of the March 14 coalition, also supported
its implementation but also demanded its adoption in the 2013 parliamentary
polls, after reconsidering current electoral districts.
But their ally in March 14, Akkar MP Hadi Hobeish, expressed his reservations
over the adoption of proportional representation in the municipal elections,
saying the goal of reform that spurred its approval might not appear when the
system is implemented.
“If the municipal council is not in harmony, the municipality’s work will be
obstructed and fail,” Hobeish said.
Zahra also said his party supported lowering the voting age, but only after a
procedure allowing expatriate Lebanese the right to vote was established.
MP Ammar Houri said Friday his Future Movement was keen on preserving
expatriates’ right to vote as well as arriving at a formula to lower the voting
age, while preserving balance between religious communities.
“Lowering the voting age is an essential part of reforms that the Lebanese
agreed to since MPs agreed by consensus on the proposal and transferred it to
the Cabinet and demanded that it be returned to Parliament within the legal
deadline,” Houri said. – The Daily Star
Israel-Hizbullah diatribes reinforce deterrence
Neither side willing to take on consequences or pay costs of conflict, analysts
say
By Michael Bluhm
Daily Star staff
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Analysis
BEIRUT: The latest round of belligerent rhetoric between Israel and Hizbullah
and the group’s allies amounts largely to reinforcing mutual deterrence, despite
the darkening tenor of the comments, analysts believe.
Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said on Tuesday that his fighters would
crush Israel and that any new conflict would “change the face of the region.”
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, Hizbullah’s leading patron, said on
Thursday that Hizbullah’s response to any Israeli attack would “close [Israel’s]
case once and for all.”
These pronouncements, however, belie the fact that neither Israel nor Hizbullah
wants to resume hostilities, said Habib Malik, who teaches history at Lebanese
American University and is the son of Charles Malik, one of modern Lebanon’s
founding fathers and a co-author of the UN Universal Declaration of Human
Rights.
“It’s just saber-rattling all around,” Malik told The Daily Star. “I don’t think
any side is willing to take on the consequences or pay the costs of such a
conflict.”
Paul Salem, head of the Carnegie Middle East Center, said a plethora of reasons
to avoid war existed on all sides, but the recent remarks have raised tensions
among officials and diplomats.
“I still think that we are not going to have a war, but I am increasingly
concerned. I wasn’t as worried a month ago,” he said, adding that Ahmadinejad’s
latest statements had made the situation worse. “That’s an international signal
that Iran is saying that Hizbullah has the capacity to pose an existential
threat to Israel. That’s a big, big statement.”
On the other hand, retired General Elias Hanna, who teaches political science at
various universities, said he viewed Nasrallah and Ahmadinejad’s comments – as
well as Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem telling Israel that a new war
would reach its cities – as part of a move to create the perception that the
main actors of the so-called axis of resistance were tightly connected, meaning
an attack on one would provoke retaliation by all.
“It is like consolidating the line of resistance in order to deter war,” Hanna
said, adding that he believed that none of the players wanted war. When
Nasrallah said on Tuesday that Hizbullah would target Israel’s Ben Gurion
International Airport if Israel struck Beirut’s Rafik Hariri International
Airport, it merely displayed the Hizbullah leader’s acute sense for
psychological warfare, knowing that such a threat would resonate among the
Israeli populace, Hanna added.
Precisely the knowledge that Hizbullah has replenished, if not improved its
arsenal since the summer 2006 war acts as a significant deterrent against Israel
initiating an assault on Lebanon, Malik said.
At the same time, Malik added, Hizbullah would not start any conflict with
Israel because the group cannot stomach provoking again the kind of destruction
that the Jewish state wreaked on Lebanon during the summer war of 2006. “They
understand what Dahiyeh Doctrine means,” he said, alluding to the Israeli
strategy of disproportionate military response.
The recent verbal tit-for-tat, contrary to auguring war, in the end serves to
strengthen this equation of mutual deterrence, Malik said.
From Israel’s perspective, the saber-rattling might also signal an attempt to
push the United States to take a harder line against Iran, by showing that
Tehran and its allies represent a growing threat in the region, Hanna said. For
example, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman recently said that any
Israeli-Syrian conflict would lead to the downfall of Syrian President Bashar
Assad.
“Israel is not pressuring Hizbullah. Israel is not pressuring Iran. Israel is
pressuring the United States – [Israel] wants sanctions,” Hanna added. “Israel
does not want war.”
Any potential military action against Hizbullah or Iran would still almost
certainly be preceded by another round of sanctions against Iran, possibly
involving a naval blockade of the Islamic Republic, Malik said. It also remains
possible that Washington and Tehran will reach a deal to defuse the standoff
over Iran’s nuclear program, he added.
Salem, in a recent article, also said recent Israeli and Syrian posturing over
Lebanon might also be a precursor to the resumption of the indirect peace
negotiations between the two enemies. Salem also said the possibility for war
does exist; Israel’s verbal salvos might well be directed at Syria, but only to
serve notice that Israel will not tolerate it if Syria allows SA-2 anti-aircraft
missile systems to enter Hizbullah’s hands. As long as the impasse over Iran’s
nuclear program persists, an Israeli war on Hizbullah cannot be ruled out, Salem
added. According to this thinking, Israel would pre-emptively launch an attack
on Hizbullah ahead of air strikes against Iranian nuclear sites, in order to
blunt the potential Iranian response. As the standoff continues over Iran’s
nuclear file, tensions and high rhetoric will also continue between Israel and
Hizbullah, Salem said.
US State Department lifts travel warning for Syria
By ALBERT AJI
The Associated Press
Saturday, February 20, 10
DAMASCUS, Syria -- A U.S. Embassy official and Syria's official news agency say
the U.S. State Department has lifted an advisory warning American travelers of
security concerns in Syria. However, Syria remains on a U.S. list of countries
supporting terrorism, a designation made in 1979.
In a sign of warming ties, President Barack Obama announced this week that he
would nominate a career diplomat to become the first U.S. ambassador to Damascus
since 2005.
Syria's official news agency SANA quoted a State Department official as saying
the U.S. is lifting the travel warning for Syria. An official at the U.S.
Embassy confirmed the report Saturday. The official spoke on condition of
anonymity because he was not authorized to give official statements.
Mosul Archbishop Says Christians Live in Panic, Targeted in Killings
GMT 2-20-2010 0:26:41
Assyrian International News Agency
To unsubscribe or set email news digest options, visit http://www.aina.org/mailinglist.html
LONDON (CNS) -- The killings of four Iraqi Christians in as many days could
prompt a wave of refugees fleeing northern Iraq, where Christians live in
constant state of panic, said a Catholic archbishop.
Chaldean Archbishop Emil Shimoun Nona of Mosul, Iraq, said he knew of about 10
Christian families who already had fled the violence.
But he said there was a risk that "all the (Christian) people will leave" the
Nineveh region, of which Mosul is the capital, unless the attacks against
Christians were brought to an end.
"It is very difficult to live in this kind of situation," the archbishop said in
a Feb. 18 telephone conversation with the British branch of Aid to the Church in
Need, a charity set up to help persecuted Christians.
"It is panic -- panic always," he said. "The Christians don't know what will
happen to them. It is the same everywhere -- in the office, at school or even at
home. They don't know if somebody is going to kill them.
"What we are seeing is an effort to force Christians to leave Mosul. We don't
know who is behind the attacks," Archbishop Nona added. "We think that they are
politically motivated -- that some group has something to gain if all Christians
go."
He spoke a day after the Feb.17 murder of a 20-year-old student teacher, whose
body was discovered by police in the city. One day earlier, gunmen opened fire
on two other Christians, killing one of them -- an engineering student at the
University of Mosul.
On Feb. 15 gunmen burst into a grocery store and killed its Christian owner, and
on Feb. 14 a Christian man was shot dead outside his home.
Archbishop Nona was installed Jan. 22 as successor to Archbishop Paulos Faraj
Rahho, who died in March 2008 after he was taken hostage by kidnappers.
Although the identities of the gunmen in the latest attacks are not known, the
surge in violence against Christians comes as Iraqis prepare to vote in March 7
elections.
The Iraqi legislature has a quota for Christian seats, but some Arab politicians
are concerned that Christian candidates might enter into an alliance with their
Kurdish rivals, according to media reports.
An al-Qaida-affiliated group of Sunni Muslims indicated that it would seek to
disrupt the election because it is opposed to Iraq's Shiite majority gaining
political power.
By Simon Caldwell
This item is available as: html
Copyright (C) 2010, Assyrian International News Agency. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use.
Just Journalism Newsletter
19 February 2010
This Week
· A review of how the media are reporting the Britain-Israel relationship in
light of the Dubai assassination
· Account of misleading Daily Mail headlines and captions
· Just Journalism's latest study on the BBC News website
· Analysis of BBC Lebanon-Israel coverage
Dubai and the media portrayal of Britain-Israel relations
With the assassination of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh still leading the
news agenda, much of the media focus has narrowed to the potential impact of the
affair on Britain and Israel's bilateral relationship. The alleged involvement
of Mossad and the use of forged British passports in the operation led to
Israel's ambassador to the UK Ron Prosor being asked to appear at the Foreign
Office yesterday to account for his country's role.
But how serious is the diplomatic situation between the two allies? And do some
media outlets elect to depict it as more severe than others? Below is a brief
comparison of the most recent coverage which uncovers revealing variations
between different media organs, particularly between the press and the BBC.
Press
Today's two-page spread in The Guardian demonstrated a keen willingness to
portray the relationship as seriously compromised. Middle East Editor Ian
Black's article, 'Troubled alliance: Period of crisis worsens already strained
relations' opened with the bold claim that 'Britain's relations with Israel are
entering a period of crisis over the apparent use of cloned UK passports in the
assassination of a Hamas official in Dubai.' Similarly, the cover story of The
Guardian's daily supplement G2 by the same author, 'The truth about the Mossad',
alleged 'a white-hot diplomatic row between Israel and Britain'.
Conversely, The Times makes no such sweeping claims about a serious rift between
the two nations. Its two-page spread includes coverage of the diplomatic
ramifications but the central claim of the article, 'I know nothing, says
Israeli Ambassador as London demands help with passports' by Diplomatic
Correspondent Catherine Philp and reporters David Sharrock and Roger Boyes, is
muted compared with the opening gambit of The Guardian's corresponding piece.
The lead assertion is merely that 'Britain told Israel yesterday that it expects
"full co-operation" with an inquiry into the fraudulent use of British and
European passports by suspected Mossad agents on their assassination mission to
Dubai.' The article makes no claims of a major diplomatic rift.
The Independent also devotes a two-page spread to the story, with a remarkably
similar headline to that featuring in The Guardian. The Independent - likewise
keen to emphasise pressure on Israel's relationships with foreign governments as
a result of the use of forged passports in the assassination - reads: 'West
turns diplomatic screw - but Israel refuses to crack'. The Guardian's central
headline was 'Pressure grows but Israel stays tight-lipped on passport affair'.
Most notable in The Independent's coverage was its editorial cartoon, which
depicts a castrated David Miliband presenting his testicles on a plate to a
grinning Ron Prosor with the caption: 'A courageous stance...'. This visual
delivers the sense that Israel has the upper hand in the bilateral situation and
that Britain is debasing itself before Israel.
But it was the Financial Times which made the boldest claim regarding the state
of Britain-Israel relations, opening its news piece, 'UK warns Israel over fake
passports' with the bold assertion:
'Relations between Israel and Britain slid towards a 20-year low yesterday as
London delivered a stern warning over the "outrage" of faked UK passports being
used by alleged assassins in Dubai.'
Political Correspondent Alex Barker cites 'mounting diplomatic tension' and
speculates that 'These exchanges could be the prelude to a more damaging turn in
UK-Israeli relations.' Crucially he contends that the very fabric of the
bilateral relationship could be in jeopardy:
'If proven true, this could damage the framework of trust underpinning the
alliance with Israel.'
A second article in the Financial Times by Middle East Correspondent Tobias Buck
focuses exclusively on the repercussions for the bilateral relationship,
describing it as 'already strained'.
The murder of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai has received significant
attention since Monday's release of names and passport details of the 11
suspects wanted by Dubai authorities. Pledges of investigations, revelations of
stolen identities and information about additional suspects have further fuelled
speculation about who is responsible.
Although Dubai authorities have published no evidence of the suspects' origins,
media suspicions focus on Israel's secret service, Mossad.
News outlets have generally been cautious to make clear that the Mossad's
involvement in Mr al-Mabhouh's murder is alleged by Hamas, and is as yet
unconfirmed. A notable exception, however, was the reporting of the story in the
Daily Mail.
The publication's front page headline on Wednesday read 'Terror of innocent
Britons named as assassins', with the introductory topline, 'Why choose us, ask
Britons whose identities were stolen by Mossad hit squad' (subsequently
altered). Page 4 of the newspaper, where the front page article authored by Dan
Newling, James Tozer and Mathew Kalman continues, features the headline,
'Dragged into a Mossad murder plot'. Journalist David Jones writes in an
accompanying article, 'Timed down to the last second and carried out with
chilling effect, [the assassination] involved many of Mossad's tried and trusted
props'. Captions to two photographs also described those involved as 'Mossad
agents' and 'Mossad killers'.
Just Journalism has recently published a study suggesting a shift in editorial
policy at the BBC News website regarding the blockade of Gaza. 'BBC on the Gaza
blockade: the roles of Israel and Egypt' shows that for most of 2009, the Gaza
blockade was associated solely with Israel, rather than with Israel and Egypt.
However, more recently, the Corporation's website has reflected more
consistently the role of Egypt in enforcing the blockade at its shared border
with Gaza.
A likely outcome of this development is that the BBC News website makes plainer
to users that the Gaza blockade is upheld by two countries and not one. This
would be an important step towards creating a more accurate picture of the
factors currently impacting on the Gaza strip.
Just Journalism presented the results of this study to the BBC in advance of
publication and invited their comments, specifically in reference to the
following questions:
1. How does the BBC account for the recent increase of instances in which Egypt,
as well as Israel, is identified with the Gaza blockade?
2. What is the BBC's policy on attributing responsibility for the Gaza blockade?
Middle East Editor of the BBC News website Tarik Kafala thanked Just Journalism
for the opportunity to comment but declined to do so.
Reporting the contents of an interview by BBC Beirut correspondent Natalia
Antelava with Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, a BBC News website article
quotes the leader extensively on his claims that Lebanon faces 'a lot of Israeli
threats day in and day out' and that 'This is something that is escalating, and
this is something that is really dangerous.'
'Lebanese Prime Minister Hariri warns of Israel 'threat'' also contains a video
clip of Hariri making the same claims. However, at no point in the article is
any response offered by an Israeli official. Nor does the BBC journalist offer
any information about the Israeli position on the recent tensions with Lebanon
and Syria. This is not the first time that a BBC interview with a regional
leader with numerous accusations against Israel has excluded an Israel reply.
Last year's interview of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad by Middle East editor
Jeremy Bowen also omitted to seek comment from Israel.
Furthermore, the sole reference in the article to Hizbollah - 'the Lebanese
militant group which fought Israel in 2006' - was to convey Hariri's stated
commitment to 'stand by' the group in the event of a conflict with Israel. An
uninitiated reader could reasonably conclude that an ordinary situation prevails
in the current Lebanese coalition government that is headed by Prime Minister
Hariri and includes Hizbollah. In fact, Lebanon almost re-collapsed into civil
war in 2008 over the contentious relationship between Hariri's March 14 Alliance
and Hizbollah.
The article also fails to mention that Hariri's father, former Lebanese Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri, was assassinated in 2005, an event which precipitated the
so-called Cedar Revolution--and the attendant March 14 Alliance--that
effectively ended Syria's 29-year military presence in Lebanon, a fact which is
highly relevant to the article's reference to Syrian-Lebanese relations.