LCCC
ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 16/2010
Bible Of the
Day
Matthew 6/16-21: “Moreover when you fast, don’t be like the hypocrites, with sad
faces. For they disfigure their faces, that they may be seen by men to be
fasting. Most certainly I tell you, they have received their reward. 6:17 But
you, when you fast, anoint your head, and wash your face; 6:18 so that you are
not seen by men to be fasting, but by your Father who is in secret, and your
Father, who sees in secret, will reward you. 6:19 “Don’t lay up treasures
for yourselves on the earth, where moth and rust consume, and where thieves
break through and steal; 6:20 but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven,
where neither moth nor rust consume, and where thieves don’t break through and
steal; 6:21 for where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special
Reports
Israel is accused of waging
covert war across the Middle East/By: Sheera Frenkel/The Times/February
15/10
The state and the conscience/Now
Lebanon/February 15, 10
Necessary Preliminary Steps on the Middle-East Peace Road/By:
Rabbi Daniel M. Zucker/February
15/10
Syria is no different from Hamas or
Hezbollah/By Gabriel Siboni/February
15/10
Clinton: Iran is turning into
military dictatorship By Amos Harel and Haaretz Service/February
15/10
Canada Deplores Iran’s Detention
of Members of the Baha’i Community/February
15/10
Latest News Reports From
Miscellaneous Sources for February 15/10
Berri, Hizbullah, Jumblat
Distinguished between Hariri and his Allies/Naharnet
60
Victims Identified, Plane Wreckage Removal Awaits Committee Decision/Naharnet
Report:
Israel Targeting Meetings between Hamas, Hizbullah, Iranian Members/Naharnet
Australian Court Sentences 5 Men, Including Lebanese, in Terror Plot/Naharnet
Constitutional Council
Invites Candidates to Fill Diab's Vacant Seat/Naharnet
Le Monde: Revelations
about Hizbullah's Involvement in Hariri's Murder Credible/Naharnet
March 14 Leaders Stress
Need to Accomplish Sovereignty, State-to-State Relation with Syria/Naharnet
Hariri from Martyrs
Square: We Stretch Our Hand to Cooperate in Extending State Authority/Naharnet
Jumblat: March 14 'a Stage That Served Its Purpose', I Don't Consider It Failed/Naharnet
Geagea Urges Opposition Leaders 'to Place Weapons in State's Service'/Naharnet
Gemayel Asks Syria to Treat Lebanon 'as a Sovereign State'/Naharnet
Saniora: We Resist Israel
Shoulder-to-Shoulder, But We Shouldn't Give It Alibis to Attack Us/Naharnet
Iran’s nuclear chief: World powers
make new enrichment offer/Now
Lebanon
Municipal elections might not be
held on time, Harb says/Now
Lebanon
Al-Watan says Geagea, Siniora speeches target Hezbollah/Now
Lebanon
Berri voices surprise at March 14’s
stance/Now Lebanon
Le Monde:
Revelations about Hizbullah's Involvement in Hariri's Murder Credible
Naharnet/The French newspaper Le Monde said that revelations published by the
German weekly magazine Der Spiegel about Hizbullah's involvement in the 2005
assassination of ex-PM Rafik Hariri were "trustworthy." It said that primary
conclusions of the investigation since 2005 pointed a finger at Syria. Damascus,
however, hailed as a "victory" the release in April of four Lebanese generals
who were held for nearly four years without charges over Hairiri's murder. Their
release was not due to errors in the conclusions of the probe, but due to the
methods adopted by initial investigators -- witnesses making questionable
statements, unprofessionally gathered forensic evidence which cannot be used
before a court.
But, despite those mistakes which accompanied the investigation, the probe is
progressing, Le Monde wrote, adding that the cellular phone network used by the
perpetrators had been pinned down. It quoted sources as saying that the network
pointed to the involvement of Hizbullah officials in Hariri's assassination.
"This confirms a May 2009 report by Der Spiegel which accused Hizbullah
operatives," Le Monde added. Hizbullah's Nawaf Moussawi dismissed Le Monde's
report. Der Spiegel has said a U.N.-backed tribunal investigating Hariri's
murder has obtained new evidence proving Hizbullah was behind his assassination.
Hizbullah had described Der Spiegal's report as "fabricated lies" and a cheap
attempt at influencing the June 7 parliamentary elections. Beirut, 15 Feb 10,
10:07
60 Victims Identified, Plane Wreckage Removal Awaits Committee Decision
Naharnet/More DNA test results are expected to come out on Monday after remains
of the Ethiopian plane crash victims confirmed to belong to 60 bodies. Flight
409 bound for Addis Ababa crashed into the Mediterranean Sea minutes after
takeoff from Beirut airport early in the morning of Jan. 25, killing all 90
people on board. Meanwhile, Lebanese army divers were nearly at the beginning of
the final stage of the search for plane crash victims. This issue, however,
would raise a question of how to deal with the main parts of the plane which are
still in place about 45 meters deep off the coast of Naameh south of Beirut. As-Safir
newspaper on Monday quoted high-ranking official sources as saying that recovery
of the main wreckage or moving it requires a decision by the international
committee investigating the disaster. It said the committee is likely to take a
decision in this regard on Monday or Tuesday after examining the data and
pictures of the plane taken underwater. Beirut, 15 Feb 10, 10:53
Berri, Hizbullah, Jumblat Distinguished between Hariri and his Allies
Naharnet/Hizbullah, Speaker Nabih Berri and Druze leader Walid Jumblat were
pleased with Prime Minister Saad Hariri's speech during a rally to mark his
father's assassination anniversary. But they were unhappy with statements given
by Hariri's allies. Both Hizbullah and Berri expressed satisfaction at the
contents of Hariri's speech. Berri dubbed Hariri's statement as "good and
positive, particularity in terms of the part which stressed on permanent
consensus in Lebanon." He said he "did not have time to listen" to the other
speeches by Phalange Party leader Amin Gemayel, ex-Premier Fouad Saniora and
Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea. Jumblat, in turn, did not waste time
listening to speeches by Hariri's partners. "I paid attention to Hariri's
speech, but I did not have time to listen to the other speeches," Jumblat said
in remarks published by several Beirut newspapers. Berri criticized some of the
festivities that accompanied "celebrations to commemorate the martyrdom" of
Hariri. Sources close to Hizbullah, meanwhile, noticed a difference in contents
between Hariri's speech and those of his allies. "Hariri sought in his speech to
strengthen the bridges which he began working on, particularly the part where he
spoke about opening a relationship window with Syria, while his allies, namely
Gemayel and Geagea sought to torpedo these bridges, mainly bridges related to
national dialogue," one Hizbullah source told An-Nahar newspaper. As-Safir, for
its part, quoted a senior Hizbullah official as expressing dismay over Saniora's
speech. Beirut, 15 Feb 10, 08:17
Australian Court Sentences 5 Men, Including Lebanese, in Terror Plot
Naharnet/Five Muslims, including Lebanese-Australians, were jailed for up to 28
years Monday for plotting an attack using guns and explosives to protest against
Australia's role in the "war on terror." The men, who cannot be named, were
convicted in October of gathering firearms, chemicals and bomb-making
instructions, along with a mass of Islamist propaganda, for the attack on an
unknown target. Justice Anthony Whealy, who handed down the sentences at a
purpose-built courthouse in Sydney's west, said the plans were "often lacking in
cleverness" but were well advanced when the five were arrested in 2005. "There
is no reason to doubt that, absent the intervention of the authorities, the plan
might well have come to fruition in early 2006 or thereabouts," Whealy told the
hearing of New South Wales Supreme Court. The men from Sydney, who are
Australian citizens of Lebanese, Libyan and Bangladeshi descent, were handed
maximum terms of 23 to 28 years, with the shortest non-parole period being 17
years and three months. The five, aged 25 to 44, showed little emotion and some
of them smiled at each other when Whealy left court. The judge had said there
was overwhelming evidence they wanted to create "at the very least, serious
damage to property" and posed a "serious risk" to the public, although it was
not clear that they intended to kill. "On occasions they were inept and clumsy,
but these factors did not make their conspiracy any the less dangerous," he
said.
Australia's former conservative government was closely aligned to the policies
of former U.S. President George Bush, and the country was one of the first to
commit troops to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The five took Australia's
involvement in those conflicts as "acts of aggression against the wider Muslim
community," prosecutor Richard Maidment told the court earlier. They spent
months collecting chemicals, firearms and ammunition, and raids on their homes
found "large quantities of literature which supported indiscriminate killing,
mass murder and martyrdom in pursuit of violent jihad." The men had pictures and
videos showing the hijacked aircraft smashing into the World Trade Center in New
York on September 11, 2001, as well as beheadings and death on the battlefield,
Maidment said. They also had documents glorifying al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden
and showing how to make a pipe-bomb with common ingredients such as citric acid
and hair bleach, he said.(AFP-Naharnet) Beirut, 15 Feb 10, 08:59
Constitutional Council Invites Candidates to Fill Diab's Vacant Seat
Naharnet/The Constitutional Council said Monday that the vacancy of the seat
occupied by Asaad Diab, who died earlier this month, would be announced in the
official gazette's next issue.
Candidacies could be filed within 10 days of the publication of the gazette, the
Constitutional Council said. Diab, former social affairs minister and president
of the Lebanese University, passed away on Feb. 3 at the age of 72, succumbing
to a chronic disease. He held several positions in the judiciary, including
member of the Constitutional Council and president of the Institute of Judicial
Studies. Beirut, 15 Feb 10, 11:55
Israel is accused of waging covert war across the Middle East
By: Sheera Frenkel
From The Times February 13, 2010
Israel is waging a covert assassination campaign across the Middle East in an
effort to stop its key enemies co-ordinating their activities.
Israeli agents have been targeting meetings between members of Hamas and the
leadership of the militant Hezbollah group, and the Iranian Revolutionary
Guards.
They are also suspected of recent killings in Dubai, Damascus and Beirut. While
Israel’s Mossad spy agency has been suspected of staging assassinations across
the world since the 1970s, it does not officially acknowledge or admit its
activities.
The current spate of killings began in December when a “tourist bus” carrying
Iranian officials and Hamas members exploded outside Damascus. The official
report by Syria claimed that a tyre had exploded but photographs surfaced
showing the charred remains of the vehicle — prompting speculation that a much
larger explosion had taken place
Several weeks later a meeting between members of Hamas, which controls Gaza, and
their counterparts from Hezbollah in its southern Beirut stronghold in Lebanon
was also attacked, resulting in several deaths.
Hamas had sought to cover up the incidents because it was embarrassed, a senior
Palestinian official in Ramallah told The Times.
“There has been growing co-operation between Gaza and Iran. Israel can read the
writing on the wall and they know that with the help of Iran, the Hamas
Government in Gaza will become stronger and will fight better.
“But Israel is overstepping their boundaries. Other countries don’t want to
become a killing field for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”
Most recently, the top Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was killed in Dubai on
January 19, 2010. He is believed to have been poisoned by a woman who visited
his room at the Al Bustan Rotana Hotel in Dubai.
Israeli officials said that Mabhouh had been a key figure in procuring
Iranian-made longer-range rockets for Hamas that could be fired at targets in
central Israel.
The exiled Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal has vowed revenge for Mabhouh’s death. He
has also suggested that the current fighting between Hamas and Israel will
become more regional. In an interview with the London-based al-Hayat newspaper,
Mr Mashaal said that future wars with Israel would not be fought solely in the
Gaza Strip.
Under the current Mossad chief, Meir Dagan, Israel is believed to have renewed
efforts to kill high-level opponents. Only months after the former paratrooper
assumed leadership of the intelligence service in October 2002, senior Hezbollah
operatives in Lebanon began to be targeted. He was credited with ordering the
killing of two relatively senior Hezbollah members who were killed in southern
Beirut in July 2003 and August 2004.
More recently, Israel has been accused of planting a car bomb in Damascus that
killed the top Hezbollah leader Imad Mughniyah in February 2008. The Israeli
Cabinet minister Daniel Herschkowitz last week praised the Mossad chief as one
of the agency’s most successful leaders.
When asked about Mossad’s involvement in the Dubai slaying, Eli Yishai, the
Interior Minister, smiled and said: “All the security services make, thank God,
great efforts to safeguard the security of the state of Israel.” While some
countries are questioning whether Israel isn’t taking credit to increase the
reputation of its defence establishment, other moderate Arab States are now
describing the assassinations as a “covert war” between Israel and Hamas.
Diplomats said they were aware that covert Israeli operations had increased. “We
watch their comings and goings; we are aware that there is more activity both on
our ground and other countries in the region,” said an Egyptian diplomat. “They
are trying to embroil us all in their conflict.”
Tensions between Israel and Hamas have remained high, despite the relative quiet
that has ensued since the end of Israel’s offensive in Gaza last winter. Israeli
troops were placed on alert yesterday after intelligence suggested that Hamas
planned to abduct soldiers. Israel said this week that it had foiled a
kidnapping in December by arresting the Hamas operative Slaman Abu Atik on the
Israeli-Gaza border. He planned to enter Israel via Egypt, said the Shin Bet,
Israel’s internal security service
Hariri from Martyrs Square: We Stretch Our Hand to Cooperate in Extending State
Authority
Naharnet/Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Sunday stressed that national unity is
the only mean of facing the challenges of this period, expressing March 14's
readiness to cooperate with the opposition "to extend the State's authority and
rule of law." "With this spirit we have put Lebanon on the map of inter-Arab
reconciliations, and it is not a secret that I am a partner in putting this
map," Hariri addressed the cheering crowds who came from all over Lebanon to
commemorate the fifth anniversary of the assassination of ex-PM Rafik Hariri in
Beirut's Martyrs Square. Hariri said his visit to Damascus was part of
Saudi King Abdullah's initiative which has positively affected the Arab
situations. "In all truth, honesty and responsibility, I am keen on keeping this
window open, and on building a new era in Lebanese-Syrian relations, from one
sovereign, free and independent state to another," he said. "Five years have
passed, and we are still continuing our path of defending Lebanon, Arabism,
democracy, freedom, sovereignty, and independence," PM Hariri addressed the
crowd. He added: "Lebanese came to this Square on March 14, 2005 to say that our
nation will not be an arena anymore and our democracy will no longer be
exposed."
"You created March 14 and you are the real leadership of March 14," Hariri
addressed the crowd. "Stability serves the interest of 'Lebanon First',
inter-Arab reconciliation serves the interest of 'Lebanon First', solidarity
facing Israeli serves the interest of 'Lebanon First', and defusing civil strife
serves the interest of 'Lebanon First,'" said Hariri, repeating the motto
'Lebanon First', the very motto he first launched on a previous Feb. 14
anniversary. "Inter-Arab reconciliation is a chance that Lebanon should not
miss," Hariri added.
Beirut, 14 Feb 10, 17:57
Jumblat: March 14 'a Stage That Served Its Purpose', I Don't Consider It Failed
Naharnet/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat on Sunday limited
his participation in commemorating ex-PM Rafik Hariri's assassination
anniversary to visiting the latter's tomb in downtown Beirut. Some supporters of
Jumblat's PSP were at the rally waving their party's red flag.
"We came here although our party did not announce its participation," said Bilal
Abi Rafeh from the eastern area of Rashaya. "Walid Jumblat has his opinion, and
we respect that. But we have ours too," he told AFP. "I agreed with Hariri to
accompany him in his car to Martyrs Square," Jumblat said in remarks published
by the daily An-Nahar on Sunday.
Jumblat arrived at the tomb with PM Hariri, Taymour Jumblat, and his party's
cabinet ministers Ghazi Aridi, Akram Shohayeb, and Wael Abu Faour.
In an interview with Al Arabiya satellite TV network, Jumblat said: "Hariri's
speech was comprehensive, objective, and acceptable. Hariri doesn't represent a
group anymore, he became the premier of all of Lebanon government." However,
Jumblat said he opposes the theory that says "Lebanon First," adding "it is Saad
Hariri's day and he chose this motto, so there's no problem." "March 14 is a
stage that served its purpose, and I don't consider that it failed. We want
truth, justice, and stability, but the Special Tribunal for Lebanon is now
beyond our control and handled by the international community. And we don't want
to overbid over the well-known standards: Special relations with Syria, truce
with Israel, and Arabism," Jumblat answered to a question about "I am a
Palestinian Arab and I can't abandon my Arabism." Jumblat said that he clarified
his remarks to the Syrian leadership through As Safir newspaper's interview and
that the Syrians have no conditions regarding his visit "which will happen
soon." "I've done all I can and I will do all I can to prevent sectarian strife.
I'm very proud with what I did on May 11 when we overcame the Shiite-Druze
strife," Jumblat added. As to Hizbullah's arms, Jumblat said: "We agreed in Doha
to preserve the truce with Israel and that Hizbullah's arms are to remain
pending a solution within the State." Beirut, 14 Feb 10, 20:13
Gemayel Asks Syria to Treat Lebanon 'as a Sovereign State'
Naharnet/Phalange Party leader Amin Gemayel on Sunday called for "the rise of
best relations between Lebanon and Syria," adding that Syria "should believe,
once and for all, that Lebanon is an independent entity and a free sovereign
State with a unique regime in this region." Gemayel was the first to speech in
Martyrs Square where a massive turnout gathered to commemorate the fifth
anniversary of the assassination of ex-PM Rafik Hariri. "They thought that
eliminating Rafik Hariri will go like eliminating those before him, but they
hadn't taken into consideration your uprising and your crowd's chants: Yes to
Lebanon and to freedom," Gemayel addressed the crowd. Gemayel said the path to
reconciliation with Syria was a long one. "We want Syria to take concrete steps,
with a deadline, to bring to an end issues that are still hanging between our
countries," said Gemayel. His son and former cabinet minister Pierre Gemayel was
gunned down in 2006. March 14 has demanded Damascus uncover the fate of
thousands of Lebanese who went missing during Syria's military rule over Lebanon
and cooperate in the demarcation of formal borders between the two countries.
"Any local or regional alterations cannot change anything in our national path
or in our determination to press forward in building the strong and just State,
fortifying independence, and accomplishing sovereignty."Gemayel suggested to
turn the national dialogue table into a place "for sincere dialogue that tackles
the root of the Lebanese problem, because temporary settlements and the
postponing approach have not caused but more paralysis and obstruction on the
level of State's institutions." Beirut, 14 Feb 10, 18:55
Geagea Urges Opposition Leaders 'to Place Weapons in State's Service'
Naharnet/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea on Sunday called on Hizbullah to
"place its arms in the service of the state." "Here is the real national
resistance you are speaking of every hour. A Lebanese resistance because its
motto is 'Lebanon First' … and last; a national resistance because it emerged
from the interests of the Lebanese," Geagea addressed the cheering crowds who
came from all over Lebanon to commemorate the fifth anniversary of the
assassination of ex-PM Rafik Hariri in Beirut's Martyrs Square. "And it is real
because it is capable -- and no-one else – of protecting Lebanon," Geagea added,
clearly addressing Hizbullah and its backers. He called on the leaders of the
Hizbullah-led opposition "to take a courageous patriotic decision" through
agreeing to give their military capabilities to the Lebanese State and the
decisions of war and peace to the Cabinet. As to the national unity government,
Geagea said: "We wanted it a national unity government to achieve transition to
unity and statehood." However, he called on President Michel Suleiman and PM
Saad Hariri to prevent the transformation of the national unity government "into
a national paralysis government." Beirut, 14 Feb 10, 18:21
Saniora: We Resist Israel Shoulder-to-Shoulder, But We Shouldn't Give It Alibis
to Attack Us
Naharnet/Former premier Fouad Saniora on Sunday stressed "the willingness of the
Lebanese to resist Israel shoulder-to-shoulder" if it attacks Lebanon, adding
"we have to make every effort not to give the enemy a chance or an alibi to
destroy our country.""You've said no to murderers and no to terror. You've
achieved unity, the unity of Lebanon and its independence, and God willing: You
will achieve its sovereignty and transition to statehood," Saniora addressed the
cheering crowds who came from all over Lebanon to commemorate the fifth
anniversary of the assassination of ex-PM Rafik Hariri in Beirut's Martyrs
Square. "We share the bonds of history with Syria, and we respect it. We ask it
for mutual respect and to acknowledge this unique Lebanese archetype," added
Saniora. Beirut, 14 Feb 10, 19:38
Berri voices surprise at March 14’s stance
February 15, 2010 /Now Lebanon/Speaker Nabih Berri told As-Safir newspaper in an
interview published on Monday that he was surprised at the March 14 alliance’s
decision not to accept his call to turn the February 14 commemoration of former
Premier Rafik Hariri’s assassination into a national event. “I would never
refuse someone’s request to participate in an occasion held to commemorate
martyrs of the Amal Movement,” he said, adding, “I want the annual ceremony held
to commemorate Imam Moussa al-Sadr’s disappearance to be a national occasion.”
Sadr, who is a prominent Shia leader in Lebanon, left for Libya with his two
companions in August 1978 on a visit to meet with government officials. However,
they were never heard from again. Berri described Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s
address during the February 14 ceremony as good, adding he had no time to listen
to the speeches of Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, former PM Fouad Siniora
and Kataeb Party leader Amin Gemayel. -NOW Lebanon
The state and the conscience
February 15, 2010
Now Lebanon/If we are to believe in the March 14 ideal of independence and
sovereignty, then on Sunday we saw, somewhere in the combined messages of Prime
Minister Saad Hariri and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, two possible
futures for the movement.
At the rally to commemorate the fifth anniversary of the murder of his father,
Prime Minister Saad Hariri spoke of the need for Arab solidarity, a cozy sound
bite that we can all embrace, but which on this occasion was code for the
inescapable realities of the region, namely that Beirut is under enormous
pressure to mend fences with Damascus. His recent visit to Syria, he said, had
“benefits for Lebanon’s stability and Arab relations.”
Hariri has a national responsibility – one that you could argue has forced him
to put aside any personal feeling for the greater good of the melting pot that
is Lebanon. Those who see this as abandoning the cause must remember that Hariri
spoke as a statesman; that today he must speak for all Lebanese.
He cannot be an exclusionist, and yet his challenge is to walk that almost
impossible path of being part of the Arab fraternity and being able to forge
ahead with the original ideals of the March 14 movement (he is, after all, also
the leader of the parliament majority). However, in doing so, there are no
guarantees that the first will not undermine the second.
And this is where Geagea comes in. For if Hariri has become the state, then
Geagea has now become the conscience of March 14. His message yielded little,
dressed as it was in the traditional rhetoric of the Cedar Revolution: the
state, the state, the state.
It has been five years since the Valentine’s Day bomb attack outside the St.
Georges Hotel that claimed the life of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and 21
others, including MP and former Economy Minister Basil Fleihan. The blast was
not just an act of mass murder; metaphorically it shook Lebanon to its very
foundations.
When the smoke had cleared, we could no longer look the other way as we had done
for three decades. We had to ask ourselves who we were and where we were going.
Clearly things could not continue, and whether elements of the Damascus regime
had a hand in the killing or not, the writing was on the wall for Syria’s
29-year military presence.
There is a school of thought that would argue that the natural balance of the
region would always return, that Syria’s influence in Lebanon was never going to
be kept at bay indefinitely. And so it came to pass. We saw in the wake of the
June 2009 parliamentary elections that, even though the polls recorded a victory
for March 14, the government today represents all interests, including those who
see Damascus as a key ally. It may not be to the liking of March 14 supporters
who voted against, among other things, Hezbollah and its culture of violence.
It is in this precarious environment that Geagea must be steadfast, and on
Sunday he once again set out his stall. He invited Hezbollah to take the
“courageous and patriotic” decision to “give their military capabilities to the
Lebanese state and the decisions of war and peace to the cabinet.” He declared
that there would be “no compromise” or “obstruction” on the Special Tribunal for
Lebanon, adding that Lebanon would “accept the tribunal’s outcome, regardless of
the verdict.” He said March 14 was committed to uncovering the fate of Lebanese
detainees in Syria and delineating Lebanese borders with Syria. Hariri must seek
to fulfill all these priorities.
It is absurd to believe that March 14 has the teeth it once had. Hariri is faced
with an enormous challenge to once and for all work to make Lebanon a
fully-functioning state, impose the aspirations of the movement that has stood
by him for five years, and ensure that Lebanon’s role within the regional
dynamic does not diminish her national self respect and that Syria does not move
from the viewers’ gallery onto the floor.
Some would say he has his work cut out.
Syria
is no different from Hamas or Hezbollah
By Gabriel Siboni
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem recently told Israelis that "you know that
war at this time will reach your cities." The statement bolsters the recognition
that the Syrian strategy in a future war will be based on targeting population
centers in Israel. It seems that after the enemy's attempts to act through
conventional military means and terrorism failed, it tried to locate Israel's
weak point. Damascus sees our cities as a weak point.
The Syrian minister's comments show the extent to which Damascus has adopted a
terrorist modus operandi that is no different from that of Hezbollah or Hamas.
Even though, unlike those groups, it has still not moved its rocket launchers
into population centers whose residents are meant to serve as human shields,
Israel is obliged to immediately issue a warning, in every important venue in
the world, that Syria is acting in contravention of the laws of war. The kind of
threat Syria issued requires a response that will ensure that the enemy will
continue being deterred from carrying it out. Israel must also counter the
ethical and legal implications of the Syrian threat.
As for the threat posed by Hezbollah and Hamas, the situation is more
complicated. A recent conference at the Institute for National Security Studies
set out the possible ways the Israel Defense Forces might act in a future
confrontation with Hezbollah. Particular emphasis was given to the fact that the
group is placing its weapons systems in southern Lebanon villages. As soon as
Hezbollah opens fire in an attempt to target Israeli civilians, the modus
operandi Israel adopted in the Second Lebanon War will become even more
entrenched in the following ways: objectives that constitute real and present
danger to Israeli civilians will be immediately targeted, while maximum effort
is made to avoid targeting innocent civilians; Israel will warn civilians to
evacuate the war zone, for their own protection; after the warning is issued,
there will be a broad attack on Hezbollah targets in built-up areas.
Professor Asa Kasher suggested at the conference that there is a difference
between "regular wars," in which the enemy accepts the burden of the laws of
warfare, and "irregular wars," in which the enemy doesn't accept those
obligations. During the Second Lebanon War and Operation Cast Lead, the enemy
did not adhere to the laws of war, though Israel was obligated to carry the
burden. Israel can announce that because of the lack of reciprocity in accepting
the laws of warfare, it will adopt its own ethical doctrine. It will take into
account the moral principles of the doctrine of just warfare, according to which
the laws of war are preserved by both sides, but will adopt measures
necessitated by the lack of reciprocity.
Just as the American doctrine in the war in Afghanistan has been partly
publicized, it may be worth considering the possibility of officially publishing
the IDF's ethical principles. The methods mentioned above could serve as the
basis for such a doctrine, but their adoption is insufficient. Israel must
announce what the principles of its modus operandi are, and make sure that, as
much as possible, they are in accordance with the doctrines of the United States
and other democracies.
The publication of the ethical principles, followed by a public relations
campaign in Israel and around the world, will have the capacity to delegitimize
the methods of the enemy, improve international understanding for the methods
the IDF employed during Operation Cast Lead, and even strengthen deterrence and
further delay a future confrontation. After all, the enemy will weigh seriously
the price it will have to pay in such a confrontation.
The writer heads the military research program at the Institute for National
Security Studies.
Clinton: Iran is turning into military dictatorship
By Amos Harel and Haaretz Service
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday the Obama
administration believes Iran is becoming a military dictatorship.
In remarks to Arab students at Carnegie Mellon's campus in Qatar, Clinton said
the Revolutionary Guard Corps in Iran appears to have gained so much power,
saying "the Revolutionary Guard ... we believe is, in effect, supplanting the
government of Iran."
"That is how we see it. We see that the government of Iran, the supreme leader,
the president, the parliament, is being supplanted and that Iran is moving
toward a military dictatorship. That is our view."
Advertisement
Clinton's comments came after it was announced earlier Monday that U.S. Vice
President Joe Biden will be arriving in Israel within weeks on an official
visit, amid growing regional tensions over Iran's controversial nuclear program.
Referring to U.S.-led effort to force new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear
program, Biden told Meet the Press on Sunday that he hoped to recruit China's
support to the campaign.
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden will be arriving in Israel within weeks on an
official visit, Haaretz learned on Monday, amid growing regional tensions over
Iran's controversial nuclear program.
Referring to U.S.-led effort to force new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear
program, Biden told Meet the Press on Sunday that he hoped to recruit China's
support to the campaign.
"We already have the support of everyone from Russia to Europe, and I believe we
could also garner China's support so to isolate [Iran]," Biden said, adding that
the world had "to make it clear to them that we can't go on like this."
On Sunday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen appeared
keen to relay a public message to Israel: The U.S. is leading the international
effort to levy harsh sanctions on Tehran, so Israel must exercise complete
restraint.
Mullen told reporters he was concerned about the unintended consequences of a
military strike on Iran's nuclear program.
The U.S. army chief said after arriving in Israel on Sunday that American policy
on the matter is clear: "Iran must not acquire nuclear capability."
However, Mullen also said that if a regional confrontation were to break out
following a strike on Iran, it "will be a big, big, big problem for all of us,
and I worry a great deal about the unintended consequences of a strike."
In a fairly unusual step, Mullen held a short press conference at the U.S.
Embassy in Tel Aviv. He then met with the Israel's military leadership,
including Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi.
In June 2008, when Mullen was last here, circumstances were similar:
Then-president George Bush and his administration also interpreted Israeli
statements as meaning that the country intended to attack Iran. Mullen was
dispatched by the Bush administration in order to clarify that Israel cannot do
this.
Mullen was asked Sunday about the red lines the Obama administration set for
Iran's nuclear program. He refused to offer a detailed response, but said,
"President Barack Obama was very clear that from a policy standpoint, Iran
cannot have nuclear weapons."
He added that he still hoped a solution could be found through diplomacy and
sanctions, and that there would not be a regional war.
"We haven't taken off any option from the table," he said. While the military
option had not been discounted, "it's pretty hard to be specific."
He reiterated the assessment that unless Iran's nuclear program was halted,
Tehran could have its first nuclear bomb within one to three years.
Mullen expressed concern at the behavior of the Iranian leadership and said it
had a destabilizing influence on the region. He cited as cause for concern
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent statement that Iran could step up
uranium enrichment, and added that the country was linked to Hezbollah, Hamas
and the instability in Yemen, and played a role in Afghanistan. Stressing
America was committed to Israel's security, he commended the countries' close
defense and security ties, and their stabilizing effect on the region.
The admiral also noted that the U.S. has taken steps to protect several
countries in the region from Iranian threats, and mentioned that Patriot air
defense missiles had been deployed in the United Arab Emirates. Mullen added
that all measures are defensive. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
said in Qatar that Iran is leaving the international community little choice but
to exact a heavy price from Tehran over its provocative actions.
'If Mideast peace isn't realized now, it may never come'
By Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz Correspondent
Last update - 22:45 13/02/2010
If Israel and the Palestinians don't reach a peace agreement now, the
opportunity to do so could be lost forever, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Chairman John Kerry said at U.S.-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar on Saturday.
"Undoubtedly the most crucial and most vexing of all issues is how we can
revitalize a Mideast peace process that delivers peace?not just process?because
if we don?t do it now, the door may well shut forever," Kerry said. "No one can
overstate the dangers of another generation growing up knowing only conflict,"
the U.S. senator added.
Speaking about Israel's desire to see ties with Arab nations warm as part of the
peace process with the Palestinian Authority, Kerry said that the "Arab world
cannot simply wait for Israeli-Palestinian peace before improving relations with
Israel."
"Building trust must be a step-by-step process, and the region must recognize
Israel?s desire for acceptance and its fundamental need for security. And
perhaps most importantly, the leading voices in the Arab world have a vital role
to play with their people in creating the atmosphere for lasting peace with
Israel," Kerry said.
On the humanitarian crisis taking place in Gaza as a result of Israel and
Egypt's blockade on the coastal Strip, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Chairman said that "year ago, I saw firsthand the devastation there ? and it is
a tragedy that so little has been rebuilt since then." "In southern Israel, I
also saw the toll that Hamas rockets had inflicted in a barrage that no country
would endure interminably. But our grievance is not with the people of Gaza,"
Kerry said, adding that the process could "benefit by finding ways to allow them
to rebuild their homes and their lives without empowering those who seek
violence." Kerry's comments came a day after United Nations Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon called on Israelis and Palestinians to promptly resume talks to
overcome the daunting obstacles in the way of settling their conflict.
"Permanent status issues, including Jerusalem, borders, refugees, security,
settlements and water will be resolved only through negotiations," Ban said in a
message to the UN meeting in support of Israeli-Palestinian peace being held in
Qawra, Malta. In addition to encouraging the two parties to return to the
negotiating table, Ban also criticized Israel's settlement building as well as
the rocket fire coming from Gaza.
"At this crucial juncture, Israel should refrain from taking steps, which have
the potential to prejudge negotiations and create tensions," he said, citing the
expansion of Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem and eviction of some
Palestinians from the area. The Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip inflicted
"protracted suffering" on Palestinians, which is a source of great concern, Ban
said. He described the blockade as "unacceptable and counter-productive" to
development and reconstruction in the war-torn territory. On the other hand, Ban
condemned renewed rocket fire from Gaza, "which indiscriminately targets Israeli
civilians.
Canada Deplores Iran’s Detention of Members of the Baha’i Community
http://www.international.gc.ca/media/aff/news-communiques/2010/067.aspx
(No. 67 – February 14, 2010 – 5:45 p.m. ET) The Honourable Lawrence Cannon,
Minister of Foreign Affairs, today made the following statement regarding
reports that Iran has arrested another seven members of Iran’s Baha’i community:
“Canada deplores Iran’s detention of seven more members of the Iranian Baha’i
community today. Alaeddin Khanjani, Ashkan Bassari, Maria Jafari Ehsani, Bashir
Ehsani, Romina Zabihiyan and Houtan Sistani were arrested this morning. Mona
Misaghi was arrested on February 10, 2010. These individuals appear to have been
detained on the basis of their faith. This is unacceptable. We call on the
Iranian authorities to ensure the immediate and safe release of these
individuals, as well as all other members of the Baha’i community currently in
detention, without delay.
“Despite being a party to several human-rights conventions, Iran continues to
disregard the rights of its people. We urge Iran to live up to its commitments
and obligations under domestic and international law, and to begin adopting
meaningful change in its human rights practices.
“Canada will continue to express its grave concerns regarding Iran’s history of
abuse against religious minorities. For years, the Baha’i community in
particular has been targeted by the Iranian government and subjected to
persecution, discrimination and detention, despite the community’s peaceful
nature. The Iranian government has waged a systematic propaganda campaign
against the Baha’i faith, employing all forms of state-controlled media to
incite hatred and suspicion against the Baha’i.”
- 30 -
For further information, media representatives may contact:
Catherine Loubier
Director of Communications
Office of the Minister of Foreign Affairs
613-995-1851
Foreign Affairs Media Relations Office
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
613-995-1874
Necessary Preliminary Steps on the
Middle-East Peace Road
Rabbi Daniel M.
Zucker, Professor
12 Feb 2010Last month, President Barack H.
Obama, in his first State of the Union address, admitted that his Middle East
policy as pertains to the Israel-Palestine conflict has been a failure. Iran’s
continued rejection of all western diplomatic offers demonstrates graphically
that President Obama’s policy of engagement likewise has been a dismal failure.
Nearly three-quarters of a year ago, this writer suggested that Obama follow a
different course in order to achieve his goals.[1]
Despite being awarded the Nobel Peace prize, it’s time to for the White House to
recognize that peace requires more homework than either the president’s team
performed, or did the team of his predecessor, despite genuine good intentions
on the part of both groups. After all, we are talking about the Middle East,
where history is measured in millennia and not in single years or decades.
A large part of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict is exacerbated by the extremist position of the Palestinian Moslem Brotherhood, aka Hamas, which categorically denies any and all legitimacy to the State of Israel and continually declares its intention to eradicate the Jewish state, a goal stated clearly in its charter.[2] Similarly, strife between Israel and its northern neighbor Lebanon has been provoked by the activities of the Shiite resistance organization Hezbollah, whose cross-border attack on an Israeli army patrol sparked the three week Lebanon War of July 2006. Both Hamas and Hezbollah receive training, financial support and huge amounts of arms and explosives from their benefactor and patron, the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has been gripped by an unprecedented level of social ferment for the last eight months since the fraudulent election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to a second term of the presidency. Despite the problems at home, the regime has cranked up its aid and supply to Hezbollah and Hamas, the recent dramatic discoveries of weapons smuggling including the mid-January 2009 unidentified air-strike in the northern Sudan on a truck convoy smuggling arms into Egypt for transport to Gaza[3], the January 20, 2009 search of the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea by a combined U.S.-Egyptian naval task force searching for the Iranian freighter M/V Monchegorsk, aka M/V Iran-Hedayat renamed en route as the Panamanian-registered M/V Famagustus loaded with an estimated 60 tons of arms meant for Hamas in Gaza[4], the January 23, 2009 boarding of an Iranian freighter flying the Cypriot flag with weapons discovered in its hold, bound for Latakia, Syria, the cargo either intended for Hamas in Gaza or Hezbollah in Lebanon[5], the sinking in the Red Sea of an Iranian vessel transporting arms to Gaza in mid-April 2009[6], and most dramatically, the Israeli capture of the Antigua-flagged freighter M/V Francop, carrying hundreds of tons of Iranian arms bound for Hezbollah via Syria[7].
The preceding short list of interdicted Iranian arms shipments to Hamas and Hezbollah should serve to make it crystal clear that the Ali Khamenei regime of Iran is actively pouring fuel on the fire in the conflicts between Israel and the Palestinians as well as that between Israel and the Lebanese who are being held hostage by Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah[8].
As any firefighter knows, the first thing to do in fighting a fire is to cut the oxygen and fuel supplies that are feeding the inferno. It’s time for Obama and the State Department, as well as the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Lady Catherine Ashton, to visit Texas and take a lesson from the ghost of legendary oil-well firefighter “Red” Adair in how to put out fires: cut the fuel supply! If one wants to solve the Israel-Palestine conflict, cut off the fuel to the terrorists that have been torpedoing every attempt to bridge the gaps between the opposing parties. And today it is the Iranian regime that is supplying the gasoline to intensify the flames of conflict.
With Iran itself in flames due to the courageous supporters of the “Green Revolution” that now seek to finally end the three-decade nightmare of radical Islamic theological rule that has engulfed Iran, the U.S. and the E.U. should be doing the utmost to support the Iranian people’s attempt to bring about regime change[9]. Specifically it’s time to apply a very strict regime of sanctions against Iran[10]—cutting off everything other than food and medicines. The argument that such sanctions only hurt the people but not the regime is faulty as these sanctions are meant to cause the lower classes to turn against the regime for its mismanagement of the oil wealth. The recent vote of the Iranian Majlis (parliament) to end a three-decade old program of subsidies for food and fuel[11] has already caused the level of discontent to rise dramatically[12]. Strict sanctions and embargoes of Iran will ratchet up the pressure on the Iranian economy to the point where the working class will be fed up with a regime that spends its wealth on building nuclear weaponry, suppressing its citizenry[13], and financing world-wide terrorism[14]. From the beginning of the protests the street demonstrations regularly repeat the chant “Na ghazeh na lobnan janam fadai iran”—“Neither Gaza nor Lebanon is our business; no to Gaza and no to Lebanon. Iran is our business, and I give my life for that!”[15]—indicating the popular displeasure with the Iranian regime’s support of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Hizballah-Iraq. Although it has been clear to the Iranian resistance movement for years, the popular press is now reporting that at best 10-15% of the Iranian population supports the current regime[16].
Given the information just sited, it should be clear that any regime change in Iran that removes the theocratic mullah regime and its valeyat-e faqih (rule of the Islamic jurisprudent) doctrine would not only be an improvement for Iran itself, but would put a stop to the exportation of Khomeinism (i.e., Islamic revolutionary fundamentalism). Hezbollah/Hizbullah-Iraq would wither for a lack of funds and direction, and Hamas would find its threat capabilities severely diminished for lack of funding and supply of weaponry. With these Iranian proxies removed or seriously curtailed, the Palestinian populace would have a chance to decide whether or not it wants genuine peace with Israel.
However, there remains another hurdle to cross before peace can become a realistic goal. It applies to both parties to the Israel-Palestine conflict, but there is a greater problem currently on the Palestinian side. I am referring to the problem of corruption. The Palestinian electorate didn’t vote for Hamas in 2006 because it wanted to be governed by sharia law, but because it was thoroughly disgusted with the endemic corruption of Fatah. Despite the trouncing that Fatah took at the polls in 2006, it has done almost nothing to reform itself in the meantime. Baqshish (bribery) is the order of the day, and forget about accountability or transparency[17]. As a result, Mahmoud Abbas’ Palestinian Authority, peopled as it is with Fatah fat-cats[18], has little popularity with the average Palestinian. Until that situation changes, Islamic radicals will be able to seduce the average Palestinian voter to support Islamist parties that promise justice, law and order[19].
Although Israel doesn’t suffer the degree of corruption that does the Palestinian Authority, it too, could benefit greatly from greater transparency and accountability[20]. Too many political figures in Israel operate under a cloud of suspicion of financial misdeeds[21].
There remains another area that must be encountered before peace talks have any chance of success. I refer to the subject of incitement. Predominantly a problem from the Palestinian side[22], but not exclusively so[23], incitement to violence against the other remains a critical barrier to peace. Although the “Roadmap” of 2003 discussed the need to end incitement[24], non-compliance by extremists (on both sides) has prevented progress in traveling the map which originally envisioned a completed solution by 2005[25].
When the above mentioned steps have been implemented, then honest parties on both sides of the conflict will be able to find ways to make the necessary compromises to bring about a solution agreement that lays the groundwork for genuine peace and cooperation. But if these steps are disregarded or sidestepped, peace will remain just as elusive as it has been for the past sixty-two years.
Rabbi Daniel M. Zucker is founder and Chairman of the Board of Americans for Democracy in the Middle-East, a grassroots organization dedicated to teaching our elected officials and the public of the dangers posed by Islamic fundamentalism and the need to establish in the Middle-East genuine democratic institutions that promote the dignity of the individual as an antidote to the venom of fundamentalism. He may be contacted at contact@ADME.ws.
[1] “Solving the Iran Problem Could Help Solve the Palestinian Problem, but not Vice Versa”, http://www.worldsentinel.com/articles/view/102662, May 17, 2009.
[2] See Articles 6, 7, 13, 14, and especially 15 and 28 of “The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), August 18, 1988, http://www.mideastweb.org/hamas.htm.
[3] Michael R. Gordon & Jeffrey Gettleman, “U.S. Officials Say Israel Struck in Sudan”, The New York Times, March 26, 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/27/world/africa/27sudan.html?_r=1, and Robert Mackey, “The Sudan Airstrike Mystery”, The New York Times, March 26, 2009, http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/sudan-airstrike-mystery/.
[4] Debka, “US-Egyptian Red Sea hunt for Iranian ship carrying 60-tons of arms for Hamas”, http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2009/01/us-egyptian-red-sea-hunt-for-iranian.html, January 23, 2009.
[5] Debka, “US Warships Board Iranian Ship Carrying Arms For Hamas”, http://patdollard.com/2009/01/us-warships-board-iranian-ship-carrying-arms-for-hamas/, January 24, 2009.
[6] Al-Usbu, “Report: ‘Iranian ship sunk while bringing weapons to Gaza’”, http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=210123, April 26, 2009. See also:
Haaretz Service, “Iran arms ship bound for Gaza downed near Sudan”, Haaretz, April 27, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1081215.html.
[7] Yossi Melman, “ANALYSIS: Arms ship seizure just another battle in the secret war with Iran”, Haaretz, November 5, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1125896.html.
[8] Elias Bejjani, “Extinguish Lebanon’s Inferno before it Burns You”, Global Politician, January 28, 2010, http://www.globalpolitician.com/26198-lebanon, and Ibid, “Shiite Lebanese are fleeing Hezbollah’s ministate”, Global Politician, January 22, 2010, http://www.globalpolitician.com/26180-hezbollah-lebanon.
[9] Saba Farzan, “Iran’s Revolution Devoured By Its Own Children”, Wall Street Journal, February 9, 2010, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704820904575054810881353520.html?mod=googlenews_wsj.
[10] Mehdi Kaliji and J. Scott Carpenter, “America and the Iranian Political Reform Movement: First, Do No Harm”, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, February 3, 2010, http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC07.php?CID=512. For video of their presentation before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs,, see: http://www.internationalrelations.house.gov/hearing_notice.asp?id=1148.
[11] Gregg Carlstrom, “Iran’s parliament approves controversial subsidy reforms”, The Majlis, January 14, 2010, http://www.themajlis.org/2010/01/14/irans-parliament-approves-controversial-subsidy-reforms.
[12] Djavad (Salehi-Isfahani), “A good time for goodbye to subsidies”, Tyranny of numbers, January 16, 2010, http://djavad.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/a-good-time-for-goodbye-to-subsidies/#more-647.
[13] Ali Alfoneh, “The Basij Resistance Force: A Weak Link in Iranian Regime?” (Policy Watch # 1627), The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, February 5, 2010, http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=3171.
[14] Brian Binley, “BINLEY: Iran revolution needs support”, The Washington Times, February 9, 2010, http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/09/new-revolution-needs-support-of-sanctions/.
[15] Afshin Ellian, “Iranians Want Regime Change”, Wall Street Journal, December 30, 2009, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703510304574625713733452476.html. Also see the following videos: “No to Gaza No to Lebanon, I die for Iran”, Tehran, September 17, 2009, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozU5KTSyh7c&NR=1, and “No Gaza, no Lebanon just Iran”, June 15, 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSpG7EH6yrA.
[16] Amil Imani, “Empowering Iranians”, Arutz Sheva, January 14, 2010, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/9260. See also: Jerry Guo, “Iranians Tire of Ahmadinejad’s Nuclear Push”, Newsweek, October 5, 2009, http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/wealthofnations/archive/2009/10/05/iranians-tire-of-ahmadinejad-s-nuclear-push.aspx, and Dieter Bednarz & Eric Follath, “The Iranian Regime’s Fear of the People—The Beginning of the End?”, Der Spiegel, January 5, 2010, http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=55168.
[17] Ed Rettig, “The New Fatah Charter, ‘Long Live Palestine: Free and Arab’”, AJC Weekly Briefing on Israeli and Middle Eastern Affairs, February 3, 2010, http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=1717407&ct=7982403&msource=IMPACT13&tr=y&auid=5893885.
[18] Mohammed Daraghmeh, “Israeli TV alleges Palestinian corruption”, (The Associated Press), The Washington Post, February 10, 2010, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/10/AR2010021002557.html, and Khaled Abu Toameh, “PA issues arrest warrant for Shabaneh”, The Jerusalem Post, February 11, 2010, http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=168375.
[19] Khaled Abu Toameh, “Corruption will let Hamas take W. Bank”, The Jerusalem Post, January 29, 2010, http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=167194.
[20] Ron Friedman, “Israel ranks 32 in global corruption index”, The Jerusalem Post, November 18, 2009, http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:pHUeHIA7WFwJ:www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite%3Fcid%3D1258489190747%26pagename.
[21] Haaretz service, “Poll: 90% of public believes Israeli leadership rife with corruption”, Haaretz, October 6, 2008, http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/spages/991476.html, and Ze’ev Segal, “Olmert indictment sounds alarm on Israel corruption”, Haaretz, August 30, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1111127.html.
[22] Peggy Shapiro, “Palestinian Hate-Education Continues”, American thinker, April 2, 2008, http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/palestinian_hateeducation_cont.html, and Brooke M. Goldstein, “Can Hamas Make Sesame Street Sweet?”, The American Spectator, October 12, 2009, http://spectator.org/archives/2009/10/12/can-hamas-make-sesame-street-s.
[23] Haaretz Service, “West Bank rabbi: Jews can kill Gentiles who threaten Israel”, Haaretz, November 24, 2009, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126890.html.
[24] U.S. Department of State, “Roadmap to Solution of Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”, America.gov, April 30, 2003, http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2003/April/20030430134837relhcie0.3930475.html.