LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
April 30/08
Bible Reading of the day.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to
Saint John 16,5-11. But now I am going to the one who sent me, and not one of
you asks me, 'Where are you going?'But because I told you this, grief has filled
your hearts. But I tell you the truth, it is better for you that I go. For if I
do not go, the Advocate will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to
you. And when he comes he will convict the world in regard to sin and
righteousness and condemnation: sin, because they do not believe in me;
righteousness, because I am going to the Father and you will no longer see me;
condemnation, because the ruler of this world has been condemned. Coming of the
Advocate
Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special Reports
Mutual Suspicions over the Lebanese Dialogue-By: Elias Harfoush 29/04/08
The Turkish Passage-By:
Ghassan Charbel
29/04/08
Lebanon's Christians in crisis-By Sana Abdullah 29/04/08
A 'Long Hot Summer' in Lebanon?By Rick Moran 29.04/08
Latest
News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for April 29/08
Hariri, Gemayel say dialogue must lead to
presidential vote-Daily Star
Pakradunian sees renewal of national dialogue-Daily
Star
Mofaz to Rice: Hizbullah controls south Lebanon-Ynetnews
Hariri Sets Presidential Election Deadline for May 13-Naharnet
Kanaan says FPM still party of choice for Christians-Daily
Star
Jumblatt calls for resolution of economic crisis-Daily
Star
Visitors to Bkirki stress need to elect Suleiman-Daily
Star
Israelis accuse UNIFIL of 'half-truths'-Daily
Star
Fadlallah says US, Israeli bid to divide Muslims will
fail-Daily Star
Syria's influence still strong three years after
pullout-AFP
Minimum wage hike as early as Tuesday - Abboud-Daily
Star
Finance Ministry reports reduction in budget deficit-Daily
Star
Former Jezzine MP, three-time minister dies-Daily
Star
Jailed security chiefs 'not linked' to Roumieh riots-Daily
Star
Edde: Hizbullah Nibbling Lebanon-Naharnet
Israeli officials say UN forces in Lebanon not reporting Hezbollah ...International
Herald Tribune
Spain's defense minister visits peacekeepers in southern Lebanon-International
Herald Tribune
Spain's Defense Minister Visits UN Troops in Lebanon-Naharnet
French Delegate Tells His Kidnapping Story ... Hizbullah Justifies
Detention-Naharnet
Jumblat Wants Government to Combat Economic Hardships-Naharnet
Corrective Labor Movement Wants Pay Raise by May Day-Naharnet
Al-Faisal Plays Down Muallem's Warnings Against
Internationalizing Lebanon's Crisis-Naharnet
Lebanese Forces Denounce Abduction of French politician-Naharnet
Michel Murr for Electing a President on May 13-Naharnet
Edde: Hizbullah Nibbling Lebanon-Naharnet
Israel Accuses UNIFIL of Hiding Info about Hizbullah from Security Council-Naharnet
March 14 Official Announcement Regarding Dialogue Offer in 48 Hours-Naharnet
Gun Prices Shoot Up in Lebanon after Fears of War-Naharnet
Saudi Denies Beheading of Syrians is Politically-Motivated
'UN not reporting Hizbullah actions'
By
ASSOCIATED PRESS
United Nations peacekeeping forces in Lebanon are not fully reporting illegal
Hizbullah actions in south Lebanon to the Security Council, government officials
said Monday. Slideshow: Pictures of the week The government accuses the Islamist
group of violating the terms of a 2006 cease-fire that calls for Hizbullah to
disarm and bars its operatives from entering a buffer zone along the northern
border. The UN peacekeeping force that was strengthened in the area under the
cease-fire is supposed to report violations to the Security Council, but has not
done so, the officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity due to the
sensitive diplomatic nature of the comments. In one example at the end of March,
UN forces confronted a suspicious pickup truck and armed men following it in two
vehicles, the officials said. A full report on the incident was not submitted to
the Security Council, the officials said. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon briefly
mentioned the incident in a report to the council last week, saying a UN patrol
"encountered unidentified armed elements." He labeled their presence a "serious
violation" of the Security Council resolutions, but did not mention Hizbullah by
name. He said he would give a fuller account in an upcoming report on Lebanon.
At the time of the incident, the UN peacekeeping force, known as UNIFIL,
reported that armed men in two vehicles blocked the patrol from following the
truck. When the patrol challenged the armed men, they fled the scene before they
could be identified, UNIFIL spokeswoman Yasmina Bouziane said after the
incident.
UNIFIL did not immediately respond on Monday to a request for comment on the
Israeli officials' accusations. Under the UN-brokered cease-fire, the UN forces
stationed in south Lebanon were beefed up to 13,500 in an effort to ensure calm
in the area. They joined 15,000 Lebanese army forces who were deployed near the
border to help Lebanon extend its authority to the south for the first time in
decades. Despite the presence of the forces, Israeli officials believe that
Hizbullah has smuggled thousands of rockets and anti-tank missiles into south
Lebanon since the end of the war in August 2006. In 2000, Israel withdrew from a
"security zone" it had occupied in south Lebanon for 18 years to prevent
cross-border attacks.
The Turkish
Passage
Ghassan Charbel
Al-Hayat - 28/04/08//
Turkey looks at the region and becomes anxious. Its Iraqi neighbor wallows in
the midst of a bloody storm; occupation, terrorism, resistance and sectarian
conflict. Any permanent disintegration in Iraq would carry the Kurdish fires
into the Turkish house. Iraq's unity controls the limits of federalism and curbs
Iran's ability to pull the strings in Iraq. This is why Turkey has an interest
in a united and democratic Iraq with no room on its territories for a small
independent Kurdish state or for the tiny state of al-Zawahiri.
Turkey looks at the region and sees Iran addressing the world and the region
through its attempt to control two cards: threatening oil security and
threatening Israel's security. Iran's ambition to lead the region is no longer a
matter of assumption or speculation. Tehran is present in the daily details of
Iraq, both on the security and political levels. The "July War" successfully
confirmed its presence on the Mediterranean. But this expansion depends on a
visa through the Syrian border. A nuclear Iran will not be good news for Turkey,
even if the latter comes under the NATO umbrella.
Turkey looks at Syria and feels relieved for the improvement in bilateral
relations over the past few years. However, with its alliance with Iran, Syria
strands at the center of the conflict with Israel. At the same time, it clashes
with Bush's America in Iraq and with the US, Europe, and major Arab states over
the situation in Lebanon. Turkey has no interest in seeing Syria go all the way
in its political adventure with Iran. Nor does it have an interest in another
Iraq at its borders.
A simple comparison reveals the differences in calculations, methods and means
of creating roles. When Mahmoud Ahmedinejad visited Damascus, many wondered
about the timing of the next war in South Lebanon and whether its fires would
spill over beyond the Lebanese courtyard. When Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited
Damascus, he officially announced Turkey's mediation to resume Syrian-Israeli
peace talks.
The Turkish appearance culminated years of meticulous calculations. Turkey has
wisely dealt with the post-September 11 world. It specifically benefited from
the coexistence within state institutions between a party with Islamic roots and
an army that guards the secular heritage of Ataturk. It went to Afghanistan in
its NATO uniform and to South Lebanon with the will of international legitimacy.
It also benefited from Damascus' need to counterbalance its Tehran alliance with
strong ties to Ankara, as if Syria was aware of its need for the Turkish
passage.
In the sick and turbulent region, Turkey has been preparing itself for a
regional role whose cards it has gathered. It is a NATO State with close US ties
that did not prevent it from opposing the US invasion of Iraq. It is a state
that dreams of the European club though it is equally planted in the Middle
East. Hence, it made sure to maintain the ability to talk to all sides,
including Israel, to exercise the capacity of delivering messages later.
Erdogan's mission is not easy. It may even be described as tedious. It is
difficult to believe that Olmert's government is capable of making a decision as
big as withdrawing from the Golan Heights. It will not be easy for Syria either
to reformulate its regional role on the basis of peace with Israel. The American
accusations against Syria over the nuclear reactor are not to be taken lightly
either. Betting on the next American administration is not guaranteed. A
complete withdrawal from the Golan, even if it is realized, would represent a
major shift in Israeli politics. The price of retrieving the Golan represents
also a significant change according to the Syrian dictionary on the domestic,
regional and international levels.
By welcoming and encouraging Erdogan's mediation, Syria has tried to open a
window that protects it from international isolation. However, the ability of
the Turkish passage to open the American gates may require another window which
Syria can open to retrieve the losses suffered by its Arab and European
relations. This would be facilitating the election of General Michel Suleiman
and encouraging its allies to walk though the passage of the Arab initiative.
Erdogan's mission is not an easy one. It concerns nearby and remote capitals. It
concerns Ahmedinejad, Hezbollah and Hamas. It also concerns the US
administration, as it packs its bags and leaves huge crises and numerous battles
behind for its heir
Lebanon's Christians in crisis
By SANA ABDALLAH (Middle East Times)
Published: April 28, 2008
Lebanese Christian politician Michel Aoun (right) took the Christian community
by surprise when he allied himself with Hezbollah shortly after returning to
Lebanon from a 15-year exile in France. Aoun is shown in this March 2006 photo
with Lebanon's former president Amin Gemayel. (Photo by ABACAUSA via Newscom)
The Lebanese political crisis has plunged the powerful Maronite Christian
community into a crisis of its own, raising fears that the longer the
presidential seat remains vacant, the greater the threat on the community's
political role.
While the country's rivals all agree that the crisis is a purely political one,
the sectarian undertones are clear and apparently are affecting the position of
the religious-based political communities in a country that functions on a
multi-confessional system that is intended to allow power-sharing between the
three major sects.
According to a 1943 "national pact" after Lebanon's independence from France,
the presidential seat is allocated to a Maronite Christian, while the prime
minister must be a Muslim Sunni and the House speaker a Muslim Shiite.
But the country has been without that Christian president since pro-Syrian Emile
Lahoud stepped down at the end of his term last November, while the pro-Western
March 14 alliance and the anti-Western March 8 opposition quarrel over the
make-up of the new government before parliament can elect their "consensus
candidate," army chief General Michel Suleiman.
Lebanese analysts agree that if the Christians – traditionally allied with the
West – were united in one political camp, the presidential palace in Baabda
would have not become vacant by even a single day and the country would not be
facing its worst political crisis since the end of the 1975-1990 civil war.
Not all politicians disagree with this assessment, however. Another point of
view is that the solution to the problems blocking the election of Suleiman is
not solely a Christian matter and that the Maronite Church did urge the
Christian parties in parliament to vote for a president without preconditions.
Antoine Zahra, a Christian MP from the Lebanese Forces, placed the blame on the
Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), led by former army general Michel Aoun, for
setting conditions and hurdles to the election.
Eighteen parliament election sessions were postponed after the Hezbollah-led
opposition, of which the FPM and its 21 MPs are members, boycotted the votes.
House Speaker Nabih Berri set May 13 as a new date to vote.
In fact, Aoun took the Christian community by surprise when he allied himself
with Hezbollah, backed by Syria and Iran, shortly after he returned to Lebanon
from a 15-year exile in France.
During his exile, he had repeatedly opposed the Syrian presence in his country
and returned home only after Damascus withdrew its troops after a 29-year
presence, following domestic and international pressure in the aftermath of
former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri's assassination in February 2005.
In an interview with the Middle East Times at his high-security residence in
eastern Beirut, Zahra said that while the FPM is not directly linked to Syria,
Aoun's party is allied with an opposition that is backed by Syria.
He indicated that Damascus was directly ordering its allies Hezbollah and the
Shiite Amal Movement, led by House Speaker Nabih Berri, to repeatedly boycott
parliament's election sessions so they will fall short of the required
two-thirds quorum.
"We know for a fact that there is a fundamental and vital Syrian role that could
be played in pressuring the March 8 [opposition] group through Hezbollah and
Amal," Zahra said. "We don't say that Syria is pressuring the FMP, but we say it
is linked to a force that is directly linked to Syria."
The MP said the Christians in the March 14 coalition see Aoun's alliance with
Hezbollah as harming the Lebanese, particularly the Christian interests, since
Hezbollah works to "achieve the Iranian strategic scheme in the Middle East."
The FPM, which has a substantial grassroots following, refuses to associate
itself with Syria or Iran, saying its alliance with the predominantly Shiite
opposition is to oppose U.S. and Western interference in the country's affairs
to ensure the country's independence.
Inter-Christian tension was heightened last week in the town of Zahle when
suspected Christian gunmen shot dead two Christian Phalangist Party members from
the March 14 group. The gunmen have not yet been apprehended.
Former President Amin Gemayel, head of the party, blamed some Christian
opposition leaders for the shooting, saying that they were "covering up an
obvious and terrible plot to spark divisions and ignite a war."
Analysts say that so long as Lebanon's politicians fail to agree over the
presidential crisis, the Christians will likely remain as divided as the rest of
the country. And for the Christian community, prolonging the crisis raises the
odds against their role in power sharing.
"If no president is elected, there is no role for the Christians in
administering the country," Zahra said, noting that, other than the army command
and the central bank, the highest Christian political position is reserved for
the republic's president. The absence of a Maronite president means the absence
of the Christian role in administering the state at the level of the legitimate
constitutional institutions," MP Zahra said.
Edde:
Hizbullah Nibbling Lebanon
National
Bloc Party leader Carlos Edde on Monday said Hizbullah posed a "threat to the
Lebanese state entity."
Confronting this threat, according to Edde, "starts with the election of a
president." The elected president, according to Edde, "should take the needed
arrangements to prevent the repeated kidnapping" of any person. He was
commenting on the abduction by Hizbullah operatives of French Socialist party
official Karim Pakzad, who was blind-folded and held in seclusion for five
hours. The abduction "requires a decisive and strong response by the state and
its institutions … Hizbullah is gradually nibbling Lebanon's existence," Edde
stressed. Beirut, 28 Apr 08, 15:01
Spain's defense minister visits peacekeepers in southern Lebanon
The Associated PressPublished: April 28, 2008
BEIRUT, Lebanon: Spain's Defense Minister Carme Chacon has visited her country's
peacekeepers in southern Lebanon.
Chacon, who is seven months pregnant, has traveled to a Spanish base near the
southern town of Marjayoun after arriving Monday in Lebanon's capital Beirut.
A car bombing killed six peacekeepers from the Spanish contingent in June. No
group has claimed responsibility for the attack or another one that followed in
July. But al-Qaida's deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahri blessed the attack against
the Spanish contingent in a July videotape.
The 13,500-strong U.N. force was deployed to southern Lebanon in 2006 along with
15,000 Lebanese troops following a monthlong war between Israel and Hezbollah
guerrillas.
Mutual Suspicions over the Lebanese Dialogue
Elias Harfoush
Al-Hayat - 28/04/08//
Speaker Berri's call upon the various players in the Lebanese crisis to
reconvene at the dialogue table has stirred the still waters of domestic
politics after a period of stagnancy imposed by conditions and
counter-conditions set by the majority and the opposition on the implementation
of the Arab initiative.
One of the manifestations of this change is that a fundamental player in the
majority, namely MP Walid Jumblatt, has acknowledged the benefits of returning
to dialogue, the least of which, as he summed up, would be revealing the
intentions of the opposition and the degree of its independence from the Syrian
position which, according to the Druze leader, remains the obstacle to internal
settlement.
Yet, another manifestation is that Speaker Berri himself who had previously
delegated his role as dialoguer to MP Michel Aoun, is once again presenting
himself as someone capable of sponsoring the dialogue without giving up his
position as a central player in the opposition. In fact, he sees that even if
the dialogue arrives at nothing more than a declaration of intentions, it would
still pave the path to electing the consensus president. Hence, the significance
of the meeting between the two men while the 18th session to elect a president
was once again rescheduled, and hence the importance of the positive talk about
a meeting for the main players before the presidential election session set on
May 13.
Despite the prevailing positive atmosphere, regardless of whether it is real or
fabricated, one specific certainty should not be forgotten: dialogue has never
ceased between the two parties to the Lebanese conflict. It has persisted,
either directly or through the media. In other words, the leaders were
constantly and fully aware of one another's positions. Everyone remembers the
sessions held by the Arab League Secretary General at the parliament where the
majority was represented by former president Amine Gemayel and MP Saad Hariri,
while the opposition was represented by MP Aoun. The sessions were fruitless
because "level two," as Amro Moussa put it, remained shut to the solution. This
begs the question: What has changed that justifies the propagated positive
atmosphere? Are Berri and Joumblatt aware of new variables at the regional level
that permit optimism?
Undoubtedly, the atmosphere created by the Turkish initiative which carried a
proposed Israeli withdrawal to Damascus and Syrian affirmation of its desire for
peace with Israel in return for its withdrawal from the Golan, will affect
Syria's alliances in the region, including its alliances in Lebanon. In as much
as the Lebanese ground is used as a platform for getting tough at times of
regional escalation, it can also be used to cool things down when there is need
to send cold messages. Consequently, it is necessary to raise questions about
the responsiveness of Syria's allies within the opposition, especially
Hezbollah, to Berri's call for dialogue and the extent to which this
responsiveness is aligned with the mentioned regional atmosphere.
The lack of trust between the dialogue partners and the exchanged accusations of
relying on outsiders and their interests were among the most significant factors
that blocked previous sessions which ended with resolutions and agreements that
were never implemented, especially the resolutions pertaining to the future of
the Lebanese-Syrian relations. Despite the optimistic atmosphere, the lack of
trust remains present today. The opposition deals with Berri's call as a means
of dividing the majority through the differentiation between Jumblatt and his
allies; the majority, on the other hand, sees it as a test for Berri's ability
to distance himself from his allies and their Syrian supporters, not to mention
its questioning the motive behind the Speaker's call which came out on the same
day when the Friends of Lebanon meeting in Kuwait was issuing its final
statement. Given the mutual suspicions, the only positive factor in all this may
be its contribution to defusing domestic tensions and creating hope for the
Lebanese that the promised war has not yet reached their doorsteps, at least as
long as its "heroes" are still capable of talking to one another
Open Letter to Prime Minister Fuad Siniora
On the Third Anniversary of the Syrian Withdrawal
Youssef Chaabane, Interrogated Under Torture by the Syrians, Remains in
Arbitrary Detention in Lebanon
Dear Mr. Prime Minister,
Three years ago, the Syrian Army evacuated its troops from Lebanon, leaving
behind it many painful scars…
The suffering of the Lebanese people under the Syrian occupation was enormous,
leaving an open wound that will take years to heal. Much remains to be done to
alleviate the pain and heal those scars.
Among the painful legacies of that period is the case of those individuals who
were arrested and seriously tortured by the Syrian Intelligence Services on
Lebanes e soil. Hundreds of them remain missing to this day and the families of
these victims continue to agonize over the possibility of ever finding them.
If the fate of one of those victims, just one, was in your hands, what will you
do?
Would you turn your back? Would you abandon that person to his/her fate? Or
would you take all measures necessary to restore their dignity?
Fifteen years ago, a man was kidnapped by the Syrian Intelligence Services in
Lebanon. Under torture, this man was forced by the Syrian Intelligence Services
to sign confessions. He signed under torture that he assassinated a diplomat.
Yet, despite all the evidence proving this man’s innocence, he remains sentenced
to life in prison.
This man is a direct victim of the Syrian Intelligence Services, and his name is
Youssef Chaabane.
The fate of this victim is in your hands because, by a mere “act of fortune”, he
remains incarcerated in a Leban ese jail and did not suffer the fate of so many
other missing persons.
Today, you have the power to order the release of this man. Indeed, how can an
anti-Syrian government like yours continue to endorse and support this
monumental miscarriage of justice by Syria?
Today, you have the power to order the release of this man. It would be
unimaginable to await the election of a President who may then issue a pardon.
What is Youssef Chaabane’s responsibility in the current political situation in
Lebanon? Nothing. Therefore, no justification can stand in the way of the
inevitable action that must be taken: Release Youssef Chaabane as the direct
victim of the barbaric Syrian Intelligence Services, and only you can do this.
We trust that you will take this bold step and we challenge anyone who would
dare criticize this gesture. Not one political excuse can stand in the way of
the decision of reinstating a victim’s rights.
Re spectfully,
For the CLDH (Lebanese Center for Human Rights)
Marie DAUNAY
President
Beirut, April 28, 2008
Lettre ouverte au Premier Ministre Fouad Siniora
Middle East Arrest and Release Alert
From: International Christian Concern (icc@persecution.org)
Sent: April 28, 2008 3:42:53 PM
We have learned that 16 Christians were arrested on April 25th in a certain
country in the Middle East. The group was arrested as they gathered for private
worship in a home, and included women and children as young as one year old.
As of today, all have been released!
Previously in this country, Christians were held for 8 or more months after
being arrested. After ICC started publicizing arrests in this publicity
sensitive country back in 2003, government officials came under increasing
pressure for holding Christians in prison. As a result, the number of arrests
has declined significantly, and when they do happen, the Christians are released
quickly.
All this is wonderful news, but we are now asking for prayer that they will not
be deported, which is the usual course of action. If they are deported, we will
publicize more details on the case.
Stay tuned...
In Christ,
Jeff King
President, ICC
www.persecution.org
A 'Long Hot Summer' in Lebanon?
By Rick Moran-American Thinker
April 28/08
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/a_long_hot_summer_in_lebanon.html
"Whenever I want to know how bad the situation is in Lebanon, I
look in the trunk of Rabieh's car. If there are only a few revolvers, the
situation is fine. If there are a few automatic weapons, the situation is tense.
And if it is packed with AKs and M16s, I know the situation could explode at any
time."
(A member of the Democratic Left Party in Lebanon)
The talk is of guns in some quarters in Lebanon and of how expensive firearms
have gotten. An AK-47 that cost $75-$100 a year ago now goes for between
$700-$1000. The government is fully aware of the gun market but can do nothing.
After all, they can't disarm Palestinians in the refugee camps nor take
Hezb'allah's guns away from them. How can they stop people from arming
themselves for protection against... what?
Indeed, that is the question in Lebanon today as the political stalemate between
the western backed March 14 government and Syrian/Iranian backed Hezb'allah
continues. Plans to end the stalemate come and go but the political life of
Lebanon is at a standstill. Hezb'allah ally Speaker of the Parliament Nabih
Berri continues to schedule a vote for President in Parliament -- 17 times since
December. But Berri and the Hezb'allah led opposition (which includes the
largest Christian party led by Michel Aoun) do not recognize the "legitimacy" of
the government led by Prime Minister Foaud Siniora, and hence are agitating for
a new one -- this time with Hezb'allah dominant. They refuse to show up at these
scheduled parliamentary sessions thus denying the majority a quorum to get the
business of electing a president over with.
The question "Can they do that?" is irrelevant. This is Lebanon. And in a nation
so tied up in political knots, so on edge as the result of the murderous Syrian
gangster regime next door that assassinates ministers and Members of Parliament
who oppose them, all sides recognize the peril of taking the wrong step or
making the wrong move or even of saying the wrong word.
The immediate problem facing the factions is a replacement for Syrian puppet
President Emile Lahoud. He stepped down last November and the two sides have
been at it hammer and tongs since. Every candidate put forward by the March 14th
Forces has been summarily rejected by Hezb'allah. This was true even when the
government swallowed its pride somewhat and agreed to nominate General Michel
Suleiman, head of the Lebanese army and a nominally pro-Syrian figure.
At first, it appeared that Suleiman would breeze through and solve the
presidential problem. But like a gambler who just can't take his winnings and
leave the table. President Assad in Syria nixed the idea until the make up of a
new government had been agreed to. Since then, Hezb'allah has added the
stipulation that there will be no president until the current electoral law --
which favors Christians at the expense of Muslims -- is reformed.
Back to square one -- or before square one if you wish. Since early in the year,
Sunnis and Shias have been buying guns while the old militias -- who never gave
their firearms up in the first place -- have reportedly begun to drill. There
have been some clashes in the streets between the factions, mostly riots over
some perceived insult by one side or the other. The overall mood in the country
is tense.
And now that they have completely bollixed up the political situation in
Lebanon, Hezb'allah has felt free to get back to the business of destroying
Israel. In recent months, a gigantic recruiting campaign has been underway as
they have emptied towns and villages in the south of young men and sent them off
to training camps in the Bekaa Valley, and in special cases, Syria and Iran:
The significance of this latest recruitment drive is that Hezb'allah is
apparently seeking to not only replace losses suffered in the war but also
expand its military capabilities. And many analysts believe there is only one
reason for Hezb'allah to make this move: they plan to incite another war with
Israel sometime soon -- perhaps as early as this summer.
The Israelis are still reeling from their perceived failure in the war with
Hezb'allah. The Winograd Commission Report exposed several deficiencies in
leadership, training, and tactics that are just now being addressed by the IDF.
But the army can hardly be expected to have reformed itself in a few months. And
with a looming conflict with an expanded Hezb'allah on the horizon, the Israeli
government is watching political developments in Lebanon very closely.
Indeed, one reason for the expansion of the militia could be to have more
fighters available if the clashes in the streets get serious -- something
Hezb'allah is perfectly capable of manipulating if they choose. At the moment,
it appears unnecessary because the paralyzed government of Prime Minister
Siniora continues an inexorable process of moving toward meeting opposition
demands on changing the electoral law and forming a new "Government of National
Unity" that would give the opposition veto power over cabinet decisions.
What choice do they have? The canny old Druze warlord Walid Jumblatt has come to
the conclusion that the majority must talk with the opposition and that the
basis of those talks must be meeting opposition demands:
"Jumblatt noted the divergence in point of views between opposition leaders over
dialogue. "MP Michel Aoun is rejecting dialogue while Berri is calling for it.
If this is a maneuver on their behalf, let us check their intentions."
"'If this dialogue will not lead to the election of a president, the public
opinion will be at least informed of the obstructing party,' he added.
"'Probably this is the justification of the Syrian support to dialogue,'
Jumblatt declared.
"He also noted that March 14 forces must agree over the electoral law. 'Dialogue
will indicate the matter over which we can agree with the opposition.'"
The majority could, in fact, call a special session of parliament and elect a
president by majority vote any time they wish. But Hezb'allah has hinted that if
they do that, the opposition will form their own government thus all but
precipitating a civil war.
It comes down to this: the majority is seeking to act responsibly, bending over
backward to accommodate the opposition's demands while trying to maintain its
position as the legally elected government. The opposition, backed by Syria, is
simply sitting back and throwing monkey wrench after monkey wrench into the
process. For in the end, chaos in Lebanon benefits only one man and one regime:
Bashar Assad's Syria.
There is little the US can do to prevent Syrian influence in Lebanon from
causing an eruption of violence. In fact, it is an open question whether the
next president -- be he McCain or Obama -- can resist the temptation to abandon
Lebanon in favor of jump starting the Middle East peace process or getting Syria
to assist us in Iraq.Michael Young points out the perils of engaging Syria in
dialogue:
"Is it really in the U.S. interest to engage Syria in this context, when its
major Arab allies are in the midst of a conflict with Iran they view as vital?
In fact, I'm not at all convinced that asking Arab states to change Syrian
behavior through 'more robust interactions and investments in the country' would
work. The Arabs have repeatedly tried to change Syrian behavior through more
congenial means, most prominently at the Arab League summit in Riyadh last year.
The Syrians have ignored this. Why? Because they know the price for their return
to the Arab fold would be to give up on a return to Lebanon. They're not about
to do that, because only such a return, one that is total, with soldiers, would
give Syria the regional relevance it lost in 2005, when it was forced out of
Lebanon.
"It would also allow Syria, from Beirut, to undermine the Hariri tribunal, which
threatens the future of the Syrian regime and which will probably begin
operating next year. In this, Syria has the full support of Hezbollah, which
realizes that without a Syrian comeback, the party will continue to face a
majority in Lebanon that wants the party to disarm. I find it revealing that Jon
failed to mention Lebanon once in his post. That's because advocates of engaging
Syria realize that the only way you can bring about an advantageous dialogue
with Damascus is to give it something worthwhile. That something can only be
Lebanon, the minimal price Syria would demand to offer positive concessions in
return."
And that, gentle reader, is the bottom line. Obama can talk about meeting with
Assad all he wants and it won't advance the cause of peace with Israel one damn
bit unless he's willing to betray Lebanon.
Lebanon is not only the key to Syrian influence in the region it is also the key
to Assad's survival. Some may be unfamiliar with Syria's role in the
assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Hariri and the formation
of a tribunal (now under UN auspices due to Lebanon's political paralysis) to
try and convict the perpetrators.
The ongoing UN investigation has shown that 4 Lebanese army generals (now in
custody) in cahoots with Syrian intelligence, carried out the car bombing that
killed Hariri. The prosecutors have also uncovered evidence that the subsequent
political assassinations of several leading government parliamentarians,
journalists, and other anti-Syrian figures was also masterminded by Syrian
intelligence as well as leading members of Assad's regime -- including Assad's
own brother in law Assef Shawkat who became head of intelligence 30 minutes
after Hariri was killed.
The Tribunal, if allowed to function fully and properly, will no doubt indict
people very close to Bashar Assad himself. This would spell catastrophe for
Assad and Syria which would come under severe sanctions by the US and the United
Nations. Since Syria's forced withdrawal from Lebanon in 2005, the economy has
taken a nosedive thanks to the drying up of "protection money" and other means
by which Syria milked the Lebanese economy to benefit the regime. The pressure
to get rid of Assad would be intense. There would probably also be calls for
regime change from both Arab and western governments.
In short, most analysts agree that the number one priority of the Syrian regime
is to get back into Lebanon and try and derail the Tribunal. No deal with the
Arabs or the west about Iraq, about WMD, about the Golan, or about their
relationship with Iran will take place without a quid pro quo involving Lebanon.
There is no apparent timetable to Hezb'allah's plans. They don't have to war
with Israel anytime soon nor do they appear in any hurry to force the political
situation in Lebanon to any kind of dénouement. But it is equally clear that
they now feel they have the upper hand in Lebanon. The explosion may not occur
this summer. But it appears that the Syrians and Hezb'allah will get everything
they want unless the government is prepared to stop them.
**Rick Moran is associate editor of American Thinker, and proprietor of the
website Rightwing Nuthouse.