LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
November 26/08
Bible Reading of the day.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint
Luke 21,5-11. While some people were speaking about how the temple was adorned
with costly stones and votive offerings, he said, All that you see here--the
days will come when there will not be left a stone upon another stone that will
not be thrown down. Then they asked him, "Teacher, when will this happen? And
what sign will there be when all these things are about to happen?" He answered,
"See that you not be deceived, for many will come in my name, saying, 'I am he,'
and 'The time has come.' Do not follow them! When you hear of wars and
insurrections, do not be terrified; for such things must happen first, but it
will not immediately be the end." Then he said to them, "Nation will rise
against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be powerful earthquakes,
famines, and plagues from place to place; and awesome sights and mighty signs
will come from the sky.
Origen (c.185-253), priest and theologian
Commentary on St John's Gospel, 10,39; PG14, 369f./«Do you not know that you are
the temple of God?» (1Cor 3,16)
«Jesus said to the Jews: 'Destroy this temple and
in three days I will raise it up'... But he was speaking about the temple of his
body» (Jn 2,19.21)... Certain people think it impossible to apply to Christ's
body everything spoken about the Temple; they think his body was called 'temple'
because, just as the first Temple was indwelt by God's glory, so the Firstborn
of all creation is the image and glory of God (Col 1,15) and therefore it is
fitting that his Body, the Church, should be called the temple of God because it
contains the divine image... But we have learned from Peter that the Church is
the body and house of God, built of living stones, a spiritual house for a holy
priesthood (1Pt 2,5). Thus we can consider Solomon, the son of David, who built
the Temple, as being a prefiguration of Christ: it was after the war, while
peace reigned, that Solomon constructed a temple to the glory of God in the
earthly Jerusalem...Just so, when all Christ's enemies have been «put under his
feet and the last enemy, death, has been destroyed» (1Cor 15,25-26), then there
will be perfect peace, then Christ will be the «Solomon» whose name means
«Peacemaker» and in him this prophecy will be fulfilled: «With those who hate
peace, I speak of peace» (Ps 120[119], 6-7). Then each of these living stones
will become a stone in the temple, according to their merits in this present
life: one – apostle or prophet – placed in the foundation, will carry the stones
set above it; another, following after those at the foundation and itself
carried by the apostles, will carry other, weaker ones with it; one will be a
stone completely on the inside, where the ark with the cherubim and the mercy
seat is to be found (1Kgs 6,19); another will be the stone of the porch (v.3),
and yet another, outside the vestibule for the priests and Levites, will be the
altar stone where the grain offerings are made... The overseeing of the
construction together with the organization of the ministers will be entrusted
to the angels of God, those holy powers prefigured by Solomon's prefects for the
work... All these things will be accomplished when peace is perfect, when there
reigns a great peace.
Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special
Reports
You
may think you're speaking Lebanese, but some of your words are really Syriac-By
Michael Frey 25/11/08
Latest News Reports From
Miscellaneous Sources for November
25/08
Ahmadinejad: Iran Willing to
Provide Assistance to Lebanon to Confront Israel-Naharnet
Hizbullah Rules Out Attack on Region, Says Resistance More Ready than Israelis
for Battle-Naharnet
Fatah al-Islam Detainee Explains Operations Against Army and UNIFIL-Naharnet
Bishop Rahi: It's Time for Historic Lebanese-Syrian Reconciliation-Naharnet
Jumblat's Visit to Bkirki Focused on Christians' Interests, Cautioned against
U.S.-Syrian Re-Engagement-Naharnet
Iran
Willing to Strengthen Lebanon Against Israel-Naharnet
Geagea Confident March 14
Will Win Parliamentary Elections-Naharnet
U.N.: Pullout Mechanism is
Only Problem to Israeli Withdrawal from Ghajar-Naharnet
Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center-The
Intelligence &
Lebanon to be ruled by Syria if March 14 loses poll - Jumblatt
-(AFP)
Ahmadinejad opens Sleiman visit with praise for Lebanon's resistance feats-(AFP)
Sleiman 'unlikely' to accept arms offer from Iran-Daily
Star
Saudi Arabia's turn to be accused of funding Fatah al-Islam-Daily
Star
Barak: Hizbullah now three times stronger than in 2006 war-(AFP)
Lines drawn (sort of) ahead of AUB's student elections-Daily
Star
Italy stresses 'deep commitment' to Lebanon-Daily
Star
Sidon's Khan al-Franj puts spotlight on olives-Daily
Star
Film casts spotlight on abusive employers of domestic workers-By
Dalila Mahdawi-Daily
Star
The General in Damascus... finally-By Sami
Moubayed,GulfNews 25/11/08
Ahmadinejad: Iran Willing to Provide Assistance to Lebanon
to Confront Israel
Naharnet/Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday Iran was willing to
provide assistance to Lebanon to face up to Israel. "We will stand by Lebanon
under any circumstances and we are willing to provide assistance to confront the
Israeli enemy and to rebuild Lebanon," Ahmadinejad said at a joint press
conference with Lebanese President Michel Suleiman. "We will set up a joint
committee that would take appropriate decisions regarding strengthening and
widening our relations," he said. Ahmadinejad said he will plan a visit to
Lebanon as soon as possible to meet the various political officials. Suleiman,
for his part, said he discussed with Ahmadinejad the return of Palestinian
refugees and the need to unite in order to counter terrorism as well as other
global issues. Suleiman said he invited Ahmadinejad to visit Lebanon as soon as
possible.Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 14:58
Egyptian Officials: Lebanon Could Benefit from Taba
Experience
Naharnet/Egyptian officials stress in front of their visiting Lebanese
officials, party leaders and media that Cairo is not against Lebanon in
regaining its occupied territories at Shebaa Farms, Kfar Shouba Hills and the
village of Ghajar, adding that Egypt cannot accept for others what it does not
accept for itself when it comes to Israeli occupied Arab lands. However, Egypt
sees that it is wrong holding up any political, security, economic and
development benefits of liberated territories while awaiting the liberation of
relatively small and narrow territories that could be subject to border disputes
requiring border demarcation or international arbitration to establish its
ownership and sovereignty rights. In this regard, Egyptian leaders refer to the
example of Taba, following the return of the Sinai Peninsula from Israel. They
compare the status of Taba at that time with that of the Shebaa Farms today.
They point that Egypt did not link benefiting from the return of the Sinai
Peninsula with that of Taba. However, at the same time it did not give up its
rights. Egypt moved to the end with international legal procedures, which
allowed it to fully regain all of its territories. Egyptian officials believe
that Lebanon could benefit from the Egyptian experience, according to the
seven-point plan adopted by the Lebanese cabinet in the summer of 2006 in terms
of placing Shebaa Farms under the auspices of the United Nations and its Interim
Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) following an Israeli withdrawal. The ownership of the
Farms is to be decided following a border demarcation process, which will
ultimately deliver it to its rightful owners.
It is wrong to keep all of Lebanon with its economy, policy and stability
subject to a state of war and confrontation with Israel, with all of the
negative implications on its society and institutions that would highly exceed
the implications of Israeli occupation of a small portion of territory that
could be regained through diplomatic means and international law, Egyptian
officials say. Egypt places this comparison regarding Shebaa Farms with all of
the Lebanese parties it receives. Naturally, it does not seek to press the
Lebanese to adopt this Egyptian model as a solution. On the other hand, Egypt
cannot remain silent and be a false witness to the high costs paid by Lebanon
and the Lebanese resulting from a policy that could be substituted by a less
costly and more beneficial one to regain Shebaa Farms. Beirut, 01 Nov 08, 12:51
Fatah al-Islam Detainee Explains Operations Against Army
and UNIFIL
Naharnet/Confessions of a Fatah al-Islam detainee named Hussam Salim Maarouf
disclosed complicity of fifty individuals working on forming a gang to carry out
terrorist attacks." He explained that al-Qaeda and Fatah al-Islam groups carry
out attacks against United Nations Independent Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) and the
Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) as well as firing Katyousha rockets into northern
Israel. The daily as-Safir on Tuesday stated that Maarouf," had expressed his
willingness to move to Iraq, he was asked to exhibit his "experience" in arms
and explosives. He began training elements on making explosives."
A house was used at Ain el-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp as a secret location
for this purpose, the paper said.
The daily went on to add that Maarouf played many "military roles" confined to
the camp, participating in many military formations against LAF and in support
of Jund al-Sham. Maarouf was asked by Osama el-Chahabi to build a rocket and
fire it towards northern Israel, to videotape the event and send it to al-Qaeda
in Iraq via the Internet. The purpose behind this was," to encourage sending
elements to Ain al-Hilweh for rocket building and training, to be exported later
to anywhere al-Qaeda wants." As-Safir related that Maarouf had identified an
individual named Yussef to have planted an explosive aimed at an Irish force
working under UNIFIL last January. The paper pointed that Maarouf had confessed
to Lebanese authorities that rockets were being smuggled to Ain el-Hilweh at
intervals through two individuals known with their connection to al-Qaeda. The
rockets were intended for use against UNIFIL, LAF or northern Israel. Judge
Maroun Zakhour issued arrest warrants against Maarouf and 45 others including
Abdel Rahman Awad, Osama el-Chehabi. Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 14:04
Bishop Rahi: It's Time for Historic Lebanese-Syrian
Reconciliation
Naharnet/Maronite Bishop Beshara al-Rahi said it was "time to achieve a historic
reconciliation between Lebanon and Syria."Rahi said in remarks to al-Balad
newspaper published Tuesday that the dispute was not one between the Christians
and Syria but between Lebanon and Syria. "It is time to turn the historic
dispute into a historic reconciliation," Rahi said. He said Lebanon was "totally
willing" to achieve this reconciliation. On inter-Christian reconciliation, Rahi
believed time is not yet ripe for such a reunion. Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 12:37
Jumblat's Visit to Bkirki Focused on Christians' Interests,
Cautioned against U.S.-Syrian Re-Engagement
MP Walid Jumblat's visit to Bkirki on Monday came to focus attention on Maronite
Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir's role in the upcoming parliamentary elections as well
as to caution against the new U.S.' bid to re-engage with Syria. The daily An
Nahar on Tuesday said that the ruling March 14 coalition wanted, through
Jumblat's visit to Bkirki, to send a message to the Christian people,
considering Sfeir on "top of the Cedars' Revolution."An Nahar quoted sources as
giving a political dimension to Jumblat's visit. They said the visit also
carried significance, particularly since it focused attention on the Christian
status ahead of a series of upcoming political events, mainly parliamentary
elections. An Nahar said Jumblat was also keen to brief Sfeir on his visit to
the United States where he sensed that the new administration wishes to
re-engage with the Syrian regime. Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 11:01
Iran Willing to Strengthen Lebanon Against Israel
Naharnet/Iran said it is "ready and willing" to meet Lebanon's demands --
supporting and strengthening its stability and position in confronting Israel
"so that the ball would remain in the Lebanese field in this extent."The daily
as-Safir on Tuesday quoted Iranian diplomatic sources as saying Tehran stressed
"bilateral cooperation between Lebanon and Iran should develop away from any
external interventions and pressures, according to the interests of both sides."
Iran reiterated its support to the process of (national) dialogue and
reconciliation following the Doha agreement. Meanwhile, the daily al-Liwaa,
citing official sources in Lebanon, ruled out the possibility that Iran would
provide the Lebanese army with weapons, pointing out that if this was the case,
then President Michel Suleiman would have been accompanied by Defense Minister
Elias Murr. Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Interior, Industry, Labor, Economy as
well as the Miniter of the Displaced accompany Suleiman to Tehran. By the same
token, informed sources said Murr is likely to visit Russia soon to begin
discussions on armament. During his previous visit to Moscow, al Mustaqbal
parliamentary bloc leader Saad Hariri established an understanding with Russian
authorities in this regard.
Official sources informed the daily An-Nahar on Tuesday that Suleiman briefed
his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the developments in Lebanon
following the Doha agreement. Suleiman hoped that his visit would provide an
opportunity to strengthen bilateral relations. He reiterated Lebanon's
"appreciation to the government and people of Iran for their support over the
past years."The Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) quoted Ahmadinejad during
his meeting with Suleiman as praising Hizbullah's resistance against Israel.
Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 11:19
Geagea Confident March 14 Will Win Parliamentary Elections
Naharnet/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea said he was confident that the
ruling March 14 alliance will win the upcoming parliamentary elections.
"In light of the recent results of Bar Association elections, university
elections and Dentist Union elections, I am confident that March 14 Forces will
win" in the next polls," Geagea said in remarks published by Ad-Diyar newspaper
on Tuesday. Geagea denied reports of disputes among March 14 Forces,
particularly between the Lebanese Forces and several political groups, including
the Phalange party. Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 11:10
U.N.: Pullout Mechanism is Only Problem to Israeli
Withdrawal from Ghajar
U.N. spokeswoman Michele Montas has said the world body expects Israel to
withdraw from the northern part of Ghajar the soonest, adding that only a
pullout "mechanism" was delaying the move. The world body is still consulting
with concerning parties to implement a decision for the withdrawal of Israeli
troops from the Lebanese side of Ghajar, Montas told An Nahar in remarks
published Tuesday. She said Israel will withdraw "sooner or later" because it is
"obliged under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 to pull out of the region."
UNIFIL has suggested a mechanism to facilitate Israel's pullout and "discussions
are ongoing," she told the newspaper. "The problem is only over a mechanism. We
are seeking a solution," she said. Asked about U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon's reaction
to the recent threats of Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Montas said: "The
Secretary-General doesn't usually comment on threats."She said the world body
was "closely following the situation in south Lebanon." Beirut, 25 Nov 08, 05:47
Suleiman for Integrating Lebanon's Resources in Defense
Strategy
Naharnet/President Michel Suleiman said the nation's leaders have joined the
conference on national dialogue to work out a plan through which Lebanon's
resources would be integrated. "That is why, the issue of disarming should not
be approached along the lines of disarming a gang. We have other gangs that
should be disarmed," Suleiman was quoted as telling a student delegation that
visited him for independence day celebrations. Suleiman said he would not be
involved by candidates in the forthcoming parliamentary elections. In answering
a question about the possibility of backing a new parliamentary bloc loyal to
him, Suleiman said:
"What has been said about the independent parliamentary bloc is not accurate …
but so that the country does not remain split among minority and majority I said
I do not object to the existence of independent (MPs). Should they be loyal to
the president? They asked, and I said no. Should they be friends of the
president? They asked and I said no. Who should they be for? They asked, and I
said for the homeland … that is why it has been labeled the National Bloc."
Suleiman said the presidency lacks "two or three powers." "Something should be
done so that the presidency would be able to establish balance between the
legislative and executive authorities," he explained. Beirut, 24 Nov 08, 21:11
Aoun: Taef Not Holy Book
Naharnet/Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun on Monday said the Taef
Accord is not a holy book, adding that it suffers from several holes and "there
should be no problem in amending it." "We don't want to worship the Taef," Aoun
told reporters after a meeting by members of his Change and Reform Bloc at his
residence in suburban Rabiyeh. Aoun also asked the Phalange Party for an
"official and public apology" for having blamed him for the killing of Industry
Minister Pierre Gemayel in 2006. He claimed to possess "correspondence stating
that the international investigation committee does not have evidence to justify
the apprehension of the four generals" charged with involvement in the 2005
assassination of ex-Premier Rafik Hariri. "I don't think that such ranking
security generals can commit a crime," Aoun said. He added that the "Lebanese
judiciary should bail them out." He urged MPs to vote for a bill to separate the
holding of cabinet posts from seats in the house.
Aoun said his forthcoming visit to Syria would not lead to "opening an
investigation into the topic of missing citizens" in Syrian jails "despite my
interest in the issue."Beirut, 24 Nov 08, 19:22
Ahmadinejad opens Sleiman visit with praise for Lebanon's
resistance feats
'The Lebanese disappointed the enemy forever' in 2006 war
By Agence France Presse (AFP) Compiled by Daily Star staff
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Monday praised Lebanese resistance
against Israel, in a meeting with Lebanon's President Michel Sleiman, the
official Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) reported. Ahmadinejad added that
the 34-day summer 2006 war with Israel led to "many achievements for the
Lebanese people and the region." "The Lebanese disappointed the enemy forever
and crushed the myth of the enemies' invincibility," Ahmadinejad told Sleiman,
who is on a two-day visit to Tehran accompanied by six ministers.
"The attack two years ago which was intended to destroy this country became a
turning point for recovering Lebanon's identity and unity," he said.
Sleiman described relations between Tehran and Beirut as "good" and said his
visit was aimed at "meeting senior Iranian officials and strengthening bilateral
ties," IRNA reported. "We are grateful that the Islamic Republic of Iran has
always stood by the Lebanese people and government," IRNA quoted Sleiman as
saying.
Shiite-majority Iran is a staunch supporter of Hizbullah, which is also backed
by Syria. However, Tehran has repeatedly denied Western and Israeli charges that
it provides military backing to Hizbullah. A Lebanese government official said
on Sunday that talks with Iranian officials will include efforts to forge a
"national defense strategy" for Lebanon, where Hizbullah's arsenal remains a
thorny issue.
The London-based Arab daily Al-Hayat said in its Sunday edition that Tehran was
planning on providing the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) with heavy weapons,
including missiles."Sleiman's visit to Tehran and the willingness of the
regional power to provide Lebanon with 'heavy weapons' and possibly rockets, is
within the context of a growing number of countries that have offered to
contribute in the arming of the Lebanese Army," said the report in the Saudi
daily.
Last week, French Prime Minister Francois Fillon and his defense minister, Herve
Morin, discussed the needs of the Lebanese military with Lebanese Defense
Minister Elias Murr, while the United States recently offered some of its
venerable M-60 tanks to the LAF.
In addition, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin "reaffirmed that Moscow was
ready to meet the demands of the Lebanese Army," Al-Hayat said.
On Monday, ministers accompanying Sleiman held talks with their Iranian
counterparts, with Foreign Minister Fawzi Salloukh meeting Manouchehr Mottaki,
Industry Minister Ghazi Zeaiter meeting Akbar Mahrabian, Labor Minister Mohammad
Fneish meeting Mohammad Jahdoumi and Economy Minister Mohammad Safadi meeting
Mohammad Jahdoumi. After talks with his counterpart Sadeq Mahsouli, Lebanese
Interior Minister Ziyad Baroud said bilateral security cooperation was
discussed. "The discussion touched on general issues and we outlined areas of
possible cooperation but I will not go into details now," he told Lebanese
reporters accompanying Sleiman on his trip to Iran. "In the future, we might
reach some kind of agreement concerning a number of issues."
Zeaiter, for his part, said he discussed with Mahrabian means by which
industrial cooperation between Lebanon and Iran might be revived.
"A number of agreements were signed in the past but were never executed and we
are looking forward to enhancing economic, trade and industrial ties between
Lebanon and Iran," he added. - AFP, with additional reporting by Nafez Qawas
Lebanon to be ruled by Syria if March 14 loses poll -
Jumblatt
By Agence France Presse (AFP)
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
BEIRUT: Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt warned on Monday that
a defeat for the March 14 Forces in parliamentary elections slated for next
spring would mean a return of Syrian rule to Lebanon. "We are approaching
pivotal and decisive elections," Jumblatt, a leader of the anti-Syrian
parliamentary majority in Beirut, told reporters after meeting with Maronite
Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir.
"Now more than ever, the movement for a free, independent and sovereign
Lebanon... and a [state] monopoly over weapons and equal relations with Syria
are at risk," he said. The thorny issue of Hizbullah's arms remains a major
stumbling block for Lebanon's rival leaders, while the Iran-backed Shiite group
maintains its weapons are essential to defend the country against Israel. "If
this movement for sovereignty fails in the elections, then Rustom Ghazali [the
former head of Syrian military intelligence in Lebanon] will run Lebanon from an
office in Syria," Jumblatt added.
Damascus maintained an almost three-decade military presence in Lebanon before
being forced to withdraw after the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik
Hariri in February 2005.While the two neighbors have announced the establishment
of diplomatic relations for the first time in history, relations remain tense.
Jumblatt's meeting with Sfeir came after his visit to the United States and on
the day Lebanese President Michel Sleiman began a visit to Iran.
"The new [American] administration wants to loosen its disengagement of Syria or
return to normal relations with Syria," Jumblatt told reporters. "As the Cedar
Revolution, we need to be careful not to allow activity on the Syrian-Israeli
track to come at the expense of Lebanon."
Syria and Israel have engaged in indirect talks brokered by Turkey since May.
Also Monday, Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) leader MP Michel Aoun told reporters
after a weekly meeting of his Reform and Change bloc that the Taif Accord, which
ended the 1975-1990 Civil War, was not a "holy book."
Taif called for major amendments to the Lebanese Constitution, but several of
the most important changes have never been implemented.
"The Taif is no holy book ... I suffers many deficiencies and there should be no
problem in amending it," he said. Aoun also urged MPs to vote for a bill which
bans holders of Parliament seats from being selected for Cabinet posts. Speaking
on his upcoming visit to Damascus, the FPM chief said that he was interested in
uncovering the fate of Lebanese prisoners in Syrian jails, "but my visit will
not necessarily lead to particular measures in this regard."
Aoun said recently that the issue of the detainees was in the hands of Sleiman.
Meanwhile, a report by the Central News Agency on Monday quoted Sleiman as
telling students who met him at Baabda Palace on the eve of Independence Day
that he would not support any candidate, nor interfere in any way, in the 2009
parliamentary elections. Sleiman described as "inaccurate" earlier reports
saying that he would back the election of a neutral parliamentary bloc.
"I was asked if I would support certain candidates in the upcoming elections ...
In response, I was clear on the fact that I will not interfere in the
elections," he was quoted as saying. On the security front, Marada Movement
supporter Ghassan Kanaan turned himself in to military intelligence in the North
on Monday. Kanaan was wanted in the shooting of Hanna Harb, a supporter of March
14 Forces MP Butros Harb.
The victim suffered wounds in his abdomen and legs. - AFP, with The Daily Star
Sleiman 'unlikely' to accept arms offer from Iran
Analysts say Tehran may be seeking to increase its influence by offering Beirut
weapons deal
By Michael Bluhm /Daily Star staff
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
BEIRUT: Rumors of an Iranian proposal to visiting Lebanese President Michel
Sleiman to help arm Lebanon's military amount to little more than political
maneuvering, as a number of factors would likely keep the Lebanese government
from approving defense assistance, several analysts told The Daily Star on
Monday.
Sleiman began a two-day trip to Iran on Monday, one day after pan-Arab daily Al-Hayat
reported that Tehran would offer him heavy weaponry for the Lebanese Armed
Forces (LAF). Knowing the obstacles to Beirut ratifying such a proposal, Iran is
more likely trying to bolster its Lebanese ally Hizbullah by demonstrating that
the Islamic Republic's longstanding support for Hizbullah does not overlap with
other significant defense roles for the LAF, said Hilal Khashan, chair of the
department of political science and public administration at the American
University of Beirut.
"They're trying to show that there is no conflict between Hizbullah and the
army, [that] the two organizations complement each other," he said. Hizbullah's
rivals in the March 14 camp have for years pushed to disarm Hizbullah, saying
the LAF alone should handle the country's defense.
An Iranian offer of weaponry "is a trial balloon," Khashan added. "They know in
advance that the Lebanese will not accept it."
Tehran would also be seeking to embellish its own image as regional power if it
proposed military assistance, said retired General Elias Hanna, who teaches
political science at Notre Dame University. Iran wins by looking strong enough
to offer heavy weaponry, and in the unlikely event that Lebanon takes the offer,
Tehran would benefit from the access to the LAF's inner workings, Hanna added.
"It's a win-win situation," he said. "It's like a show of leverage ... that Iran
can project power beyond its borders""All of this, it is not a holistic
approach" to arming the LAF, Hanna added. "It's a political level only."
In his comments before leaving Beirut, Sleiman spoke only about the political
and economic dimensions of his trip and did not mention any military aspects,
said Fadia Kiwan, director of the school of political science at St. Joseph
University. Defense Minister Elias Murr is not accompanying Sleiman to Tehran,
she added.
In addition, the LAF does not have a "tradition" of military cooperation with
Iran, she said. In 1982-83 the US overhauled the LAF with training in arms,
vehicles and artillery, and military aid from the US - Iran's arch-foe in the
Middle East - of more than $400 million since 2006 has made the topic of defense
deals with Iran "taboo," Hanna said. Regardless of the friction between
Washington and Tehran, combining weaponry from various sources is unadvisable
for any armed force, added Hanna. For example, even an organization as large as
NATO is moving toward standardization, so that soldiers from French and American
units will have interchangeable arms and ammunition, Hanna said.
The LAF, for its part, lacks a coherent doctrine to create a clear definition of
the weapons it needs, as well as its requirements for training and equipment,
Hanna added. "All of this needs a vision, needs restructuring, needs equipment,"
he said. "I don't know if they have this kind of vision yet. All they say is,
'We have to be ready to defeat Israel' ... Maybe [LAF commander General Jean
Kahwaji] has a vision, but so far we've heard nothing really important from the
army."
The muddle surrounding the LAF is only exacerbated by Murr, seen by many as only
a stand-in for his father, powerful Metn MP and political chieftain Michel Murr,
Hanna said. "It is rare you hear the defense minister say something sensible,"
Hanna added. Sleiman, who preceded Kahwaji as LAF commander, instead sees his
journey to Tehran as another in his series of trips to regional power centers
such as Damascus, Cairo and Riyadh, Khashan said. Sleiman, who took office in
May after Lebanon spent more than six months without a head of state, wants "to
give the impression that he is in control," Khashan added. "He's visiting all
the capitals of the Middle East that have a bearing on Lebanon - it would have
been incomplete if he had not visited Tehran," Khashan added.
Sleiman wishes to forge an identity as the main partner for any negotiations
with Lebanon, superseding the multitude of leaders of the country's various
sectarian factions, Hanna said. "Now Sleiman is trying to create a certain
umbrella," he said. "He's trying to transcend the daily [cooperation] between
the regional countries and the local players."In the end, no one should expect
Sleiman's visit to produce any military or political turning points - the
president is simply building relationships with the main backers of both of
Lebanon's political camps, said Paul Salem, head of the Carnegie Middle East
Center.
With the region in an interregnum, awaiting new administrations in the US and
Israel, Sleiman is unlikely to strike any deal that would put Lebanon squarely
on the side of one of the regional protagonists, Salem added. "It's part of [Sleiman's]
job to make the rounds," Salem said. "Lebanon right now is on good terms with
both sides of its political divide. Lebanon will not take any major steps toward
anyone before the whole situation becomes clearer."
Saudi Arabia's turn to be accused of funding Fatah al-Islam
By Andrew Wander /Daily Star staff
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
BEIRUT: After denials from Damascus and fury from the Future Movement, Saudi
Arabia has become the latest powerbroker in Lebanon to find itself accused of
funding members of the Fatah al-Islam militant group. An intelligence analysis
published by Stratfor, a Texas-based company dubbed the "shadow CIA" by some,
claims that Riyadh has been channeling money to Abdul Rahman Awad, a fugitive
militant currently thought to be holed up at the Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian
refugee camp in Sidon. The Stratfor report says that Fatah al-Islam had "long
been sponsored by Syrian military intelligence," but claims Damascus has
recently cut its links with the group in an effort to build ties with new
President Michel Sleiman. But Syrian support for the group has been replaced,
the report says, by that of Saudi Arabia, whose operatives are accused of
seeking to stir up anti-Syrian sentiment in Lebanon. The report notes that
Riyadh and Damascus are "locked in a battle for influence over Lebanon."Saudi
intelligence officials are alleged to have offered support to Fatah al-Islam in
the hope that Syria would be accused of being behind any attacks they carried
out. "The Saudis developed these contacts with the understanding that any
attacks carried out by these groups would be blamed on the Syrians, thereby
building support for the anti-Syrian movement in Lebanon," the report says.
Stratfor analysts say they have been told that Awad is "acting prince" of Fatah
al-Islam in the absence of Shaker al-Abssi, the group's fugitive leader, who is
described as "a Syrian proxy" in the report. The report hints at a schism within
Fatah al-Islam, saying that Awad "is believed to have split off from the Syrians
and switched to the Saudi side." He is now receiving "ample funding" from the
Saudis, the report says.
Awad is believed to be hiding in Ain al-Hilweh but despite Lebanese authorities'
making public appeals for his arrest, Palestinian security forces have yet to
capture him. There are fears that his continued presence there could trigger a
major operation against Islamist militants hiding in the camp. Residents fear a
repeat of the bloody battle between militants and security forces which
devastated the Nahr al-Bared camp near Tripoli during the summer of 2007.
The report also says that Syria's political aims extend beyond the Levant.
Ceasing support for Fatah al-Islam is part of a new agenda for the regime in
Damascus, which aims to "open up" to the incoming Obama administration in
Washington. According to Stratfor, the Syrians are "laying the groundwork for
what they hope will be a political rapprochement" with the US. Britain and
France have both made diplomatic overtures to Syria in recent months aimed at
ending a period of international isolation for the regime of President Bashar
Assad.
But the report warns against reading too much into Syrian change of approach.
"Syria continues to sponsor more significant militant groups such as the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, Jund al-Sham, Jund
al-Islam and Fatah al-Intifadah" the report says, warning that Damascus can use
these groups to "stir up conflict- and potentially justify Syrian intervention
[in Lebanon]."
Tracing the financial lineage of militant groups operating in Lebanon is
notoriously difficult. For obvious reasons, the groups are very secretive and
much of the information made public about them is politically colored. The
source of Fatah al-Islam's funding has proven a particularly contentious issue
in recent weeks, with Syria accusing parliamentary majority leader Saad Hariri's
Future Movement of channeling money to the group, something which has been
vehemently denied by Future officials. The Hariri family has strong ties to
Riyadh
Soon after the Syrian allegations, a newspaper owned by Hariri published the
transcripts of intelligence interviews with captured Fatah al-Islam militants
which implicated Syrian intelligence officials in orchestrating the group's
activities.
The authors of the Stratfor report do not reveal any of their sources and its
veracity has been called into question by a Lebanese security source contacted
by The Daily Star. The source dismissed Stratfor's analysis of the situation,
saying that the allegations that Saudi Arabia was funding Awad were "unfounded."
Rumors swirl around whereabouts of
group's fugitive new leader
Mohammed Zaatari/Daily Star staff
SIDON: The whereabouts of the new Fatah al-Islam leader Abdul Rahman Awad
remained unconfirmed Monday after an abundance of conflicting reports were
circulated in the media over the past couple of days.
Officials from Islamist group Ansarullah at the Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian
refugee camp said Monday that Awad left the camp to an unknown destination,
"around four or five days ago." The news partly confirms a report on Al-Manar
television station on Sunday saying Awad had left for Iraq five days ago.
The Hizbullah-affiliated television station quoted well-informed sources as
saying Awad was smuggled out of the Sifsaf area in volatile Ain al-Hilweh to the
camp's Taware neighborhood, where he was assisted in the escape. Al-Manar said
Awad will soon appear on a videotape that was recorded prior to leaving the
camp.
Meanwhile, other reports suggested that Awad was still hiding inside Ain al-Hilweh
and refuses to surrender, raising fears of a possible inter-Palestinian
confrontation.
Sources inside Ain al-Hilweh told The Daily Star on Monday that efforts were
under way to guarantee "a quick but efficient security operation aimed at
arresting all wanted people inside Ain al-Hilweh."The sources added that camp
officials fear that handing over Awad will lead to the handing over of other
wanted people involved in an array of "complex security dossiers," such as the
assassination of the four magistrates in Sidon in 1999, clashes between
Islamists and the Lebanese Army in the northern region of Dinnieh in the same
year, the 2007 attack against Spanish peacekeepers, and other incidents.
The General in Damascus... finally
By Sami Moubayed, Special to Gulf News
Published: November 24, 2008, 23:36
"We have a blood feud with Syria," a prominent media figure from the March 14
Coalition told a friend of mine - a Syrian Christian - who was wrapping up a
weekend visit to Beirut. "I have a blood feud with Walid Jumblatt," she snapped
back, "because he killed over 150 Greek Orthodox civilians in Mount Lebanon;
many being members of my family!" Further enraging her Lebanese counterpart, she
added, "Hassan Nasrallah does not have Christian blood on his hands. But Walid
Jumblatt does, and so does Samir Geagea!"Christians remember only too well the
reply Jumblatt's father, Kamal Jumblatt, gave to then Syrian president Hafez Al
Assad at the start of the civil war when asked: "Why are you escalating the
fighting? The constitutional document gives you 95 per cent of what you want.
What else are you after?"
Jumblatt said he sought to "get rid of the Christians, who have been on top of
us for 140 years!"
Christian nationalism is on the rise throughout the region, because of all the
persecution the community has been facing in Iraq and the loss of power in
Lebanon. The Maronite Patriarch Mar Nasrallah Boutros Sfeir has repeatedly
warned against the collective immigration of Christians.
The Maronite Church says that since the Lebanese Civil War started in 1975, some
730,000 Christians have left Lebanon. Nearly 375,000 of them have settled in
Canada. Others are dispersed in France, Australia and the United States.
According to the Public Security Department, a total of 280,000 people left
Lebanon during the summer of 2006, forty per cent of them Christians.
Many Christians had returned after the comeback of Michel Aoun in May 2005,
after 15 years of exile in France. He was hailed as the last standing giant of
the Lebanese Christian community.
That explains why many are looking up to Aoun, a former prime minister and army
commander, as a saviour of Arab Christians.
Although Aoun himself was involved in inter-Christian fighting during the civil
war - and even bombed certain Christian districts during his "war of
cancellation" with Samir Geagea - he was never viewed as a sectarian leader in
Lebanon.
His alliance with Hasan Nasrallah is testimony to broad ambitions, and a
non-sectarian agenda for Lebanon. At 75, Aoun still dreams of becoming
president.
There are districts in the country where Nasrallah wields more powerful than the
Beirut government. This Lebanon has neighbourhoods that are dotted with mosques
and filled with photographs of Ayatollah Khomeini. The Christians of the south
are close to Nasrallah and they like him.
Honeymoon
In Mount Lebanon, the base of Maronite power, however, they resent his growing
influence and status as kingmaker in Lebanese politics.
For its part, Hezbollah aims at empowering the Shiite community and co-ruling,
by proxy, through a Christian heavyweight like Aoun.
Due to changes in Lebanon, and the exodus of Christians during the civil war and
in the 1990s, Aoun realises that becoming a Christian leader - like Geagea is
trying to be - is not enough to secure him a seat at Baabda Palace. He wants to
stand as a pan-Lebanese leader, representing all sects, and this explains his
alliance with Druze figures like Talal Arslan, Sunnis like Omar Karameh and
Salim Hoss, and Shiites like Nasrallah and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.
A newfound axis that Aoun is creating with both Syria and Iran is also
frightening to the March 14 Coalition. Last month, he visited Tehran, marketing
himself as the only leader who can protect Hezbollah in Lebanon.
In striking contrast, Geagea was visiting President Hosni Mubarak in Cairo and
meeting Lebanese President Michel Suleiman in Riyadh, showing just how polarised
Lebanese Christians had become.
Next month Aoun will be making a landmark visit to Syria - the first in over 20
years - to meet with President Bashar Al Assad. He is going to visit Christian
neighbourhoods in Damascus, historical churches, convents, and Christian
villages in the Syrian countryside.
Thousands are preparing a massive reception for the General, forgetting and
forgiving his former anti-Syrian policies during his long exile in France. Aoun
after all, lobbied for the passing of the Syrian Accountability Act and UNSCR
1559 and returned to Beirut claiming that it was his efforts.
Some in Lebanon are saying, however, that Aoun is a hypocrite. If he was so
anti-Hariri, why then did he visit the tomb of the slain prime minister right
after he returned to Lebanon? He had harangued them for years with anti-Syrianism,
but today, refuses to blame Syria for any of the wrongs in Lebanon.
In an interview with Middle East Quarterly in 1996, Aoun was asked if he
dislikes the United States. He replied: "I have never been against the United
States and have always respected Americans, a democratic people who forward
their values and peace, as we do."
True, Aoun has changed after 2005. Having said that, it must also be noted that
because of his non-sectarian views, Aoun is the man who is preventing a
sectarian outburst in Lebanon today, living up to his reputation of being a
secular, populist leader.
When Christians are asked to choose between "The General" and "Al Hakim" (Geagea)
in the forthcoming parliamentary elections of 2009, the world will see just how
powerful, and how much of a phenomenon Michel Aoun really is.
**Sami Moubayed is a Syrian political analyst and editor-in-chief of Forward
Magazine in Damascus.
Ayoon Wa Azan (The Buyer was on the Phone)
Jihad El-Khazen Al-Hayat - 24/11/08//
Many things are for sale: apartments, cars, clothes, rice and sugar.
We have a nation, with its countries and its peoples, for sale. But given the
high offer and low demand, we are in the sale season, and the discount goes up
to 50% and perhaps even more.
With the utmost clarity, what I write today applies to most of the nation, but
not to all of it. There are still populations and individuals among us who
refuse to be bought and sold, although the majority does not.
I will use Lebanon as an example, as we celebrated Independence Day just
yesterday. Indeed, I know Lebanon better than any other Arab country, and I was
inspired to write these lines by something that has existed in Lebanon in
ancient and modern times, although it may have increased over the past two
years. Despite everything that has befallen Lebanon, it still provides a greater
measure of freedom than any other Arab country. On my part, I live in London,
far away from the yoke of the authorities.
I do not know if I am entering forbidden territory. It does not matters to me as
much as it matters to my newspaper, Al-Hayat, for which I work and from which I
get my income. As for the others, I tell them that I do not depend on them for
my economic survival.
I say that I am always hearing (everyone does although some choose to deny it),
in explanations of Lebanese politics, that Iran, which is facing economic
problems, popular opposition and protests against its government, is paying more
money in Lebanon than high-income Saudi Arabia is.
It does not matter whether such claims are true or false, or whether Qatar or
Mauritania is paying more money than Saudi Arabia and Iran combined. What
matters is how widespread and accepted such discourse is, as if it was the fate
of Lebanon and the Lebanese.
The point here is that this party is stronger because it is receiving more money
from its benefactor country, and that the other party is weaker because it has
less foreign backing. In other words, there is a side that is stronger in
Lebanon because it is buying a larger number of supporters, who are of course
willing to switch sides if someone who would pay more were to come along.
After the Doha Agreement, how much money Qatar had paid for the reconciliation
between the Lebanese became the talk of the town. I do not know if Qatar has
paid a single dollar, or a thousand million dollars, or if it did not pay
anything at all. The Lebanese were all talking about the amount that had been
paid to this or that party. The figure goes up and down to reflect the power of
the party in question, whether it is real or illusory. Once again, the point is
that there is agreement, if not acceptance, over the notion that politicians
collect the price of their allegiance to another country in their own country,
although these politicians represent the entire country. The next point is that
those who elected them know this about them, and yet still choose them to be
their representatives. Consequently, an honest politician is one who, if you buy
him, remains bought.
I insist that I am writing about the majority of the nation and the majority of
its people. However, I do know leaders and officials at various levels, some of
whom went to Doha, as well as average citizens, who are extremely honest. Since
I have chosen Lebanon as an example, based on my knowledge of it, I know for a
fact that some of its politicians are honest, kind-hearted, and care about their
country. I could mention names but if I did, I would be unfair to others whom I
would bypass simply because I do not know them. Thus I choose as an example Dean
Raymond Eddé, whom I knew for a period of 40 years and until he passed away.
When he was in Paris at the beginning the civil war, I intervened to offer him
financial assistance in a deal to buy land he owned near Ammiq and Kfarmishki in
the Beqaa at twice the market price, but he rejected the deal every time. He
lived and died an honest man, and was a role model for all honest people.
Today we are in the sale season, and the high discounts reflect both the
Lebanese political crisis and the international financial crisis. Perhaps we are
at an auction similar to the ones I see in London from time to time, where the
buyers are in the hall, but where there are always those who buy on the phone,
because they do not want to reveal their identity. At such auctions, the seller
can set a minimum price for the item being sold (whether an oil painting or a
country). If the auction does not reach the required figure, the seller will
refuse to sell and wait for a better offer.
At the auction of Lebanese politics, there are no maximum or minimum prices for
buying and selling, and honest people stand outside the hall. Going once, going
twice, going thrice, congratulations! The buyer was on the phone.