LCCC
ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
December 06/09
Late Syrian
president Hafez Assad admits in a speech delivered in Damascus in 1976 that he sent his Army
into Lebanon with any Lebanese's call or approval. Click on the below link to
listen to the speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=MfpHvn_CH5I&feature=related
/Now Lebanon
Bible Reading of the day
Isaiah13/13-22: "Therefore I will make the heavens tremble, and the earth will
be shaken out of its place in the wrath of Yahweh of Armies, and in the day of
his fierce anger. 13:14 It will happen that like a hunted gazelle, and like
sheep that no one gathers, they will each turn to their own people, and will
each flee to their own land. 13:15 Everyone who is found will be thrust through.
Everyone who is captured will fall by the sword. 13:16 Their infants also will
be dashed in pieces before their eyes. Their houses will be ransacked, and their
wives raped. 13:17 Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, who will not
value silver, and as for gold, they will not delight in it. 13:18 Their bows
will dash the young men in pieces; and they shall have no pity on the fruit of
the womb. Their eyes will not spare children. 13:19 Babylon, the glory of
kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldeans’ pride, will be like when God overthrew
Sodom and Gomorrah. 13:20 It will never be inhabited, neither will it be lived
in from generation to generation. The Arabian will not pitch a tent there,
neither will shepherds make their flocks lie down there. 13:21 But wild animals
of the desert will lie there, and their houses will be full of jackals.
Ostriches will dwell there, and wild goats will frolic there. 13:22 Wolves will
cry in their castles, and jackals in the pleasant palaces. Her time is near to
come, and her days will not be prolonged.
Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special
Reports
Interview with Dr. Samir Geagea
from Al-Akhbar newspaper/December 4, 2009
U.S.
Lawmakers Urge Hizbullah's Disarmament, Express Fear Over Confrontation with
Israel
/Naharnet/December
05/09
Mental problems untreated in
Lebanon/By: Josh Wood/Now Lebanon/December 5, 09
Latest
News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for December 05/09
U.S.
Lawmakers Urge Hizbullah's Disarmament, Express Fear Over Confrontation with
Israel
/Naharnet
Elias
Abu Assi: The state cannot work in
duality/Future News
Qabbani Phones Sfeir, Says Christian-Muslim Equal Powersharing Not to Be
Undermined Under Any Alibi/Naharnet
Hariri to Visit Syria after Government Gains Vote of Confidence/Naharnet
Tripoli MPs Call for Stronger Measures to Prevent Security Incidents/Naharnet
Majdalani: “Contradictions” color
Ministerial Statement, Hezbollah/Now
Lebanon
Fadlallah: Some Parties Continue to Oppose Consensus/Naharnet
Najjar Wants to Improve Financial Situation of Judges/Naharnet
Security Source: Roumieh
Prison Full of Problems/Naharnet
Report: Israel to continue talks with Syria
through Turkish mediation/Ynetnews
Report: Israel to renew talks with Syria/Ynetnews
US will not cooperate with Hezbollah ministers
in Lebanon/WashingtonTV
You may not be "Pro-Israel" if....RenewAmerica
Harb: Reservation does not
contradict with principle of solidarity/Future News
Soaid: Hizbullah's political
manifesto unveiled its hidden intentions/Future News
Discussions over Cabinet policy statement to be extended/Daily
Star
Equal
power sharing between Muslims, Christians should remain - Qabbani/Daily
Star
Bellmare,
Baroud discuss collaboration/Daily
Star
Pollution costs Lebanon $500 million a year/AFP
Ministers show unity regarding traffic challenge/AFP
Second round of AUB polls comes to
standstill after candidates
switch sides/Daily
Star
Writer Solh reads autobiography at
Issam
Fares institute/Daily
Star
Aridi slams inaction on Beirut bridge
rebuild/Daily
Star
Ambassador calls for replacing
retired
envoys/Daily
Star
Army conducts counterterror
drill/Daily
Star
Kesrouan to host second mecanique
center/Daily
Star
Man killed in clashes with
army/Daily
Star
UNRWA determined not to scale back
amid crippling funding
crisis/Daily
Star
Beirut Marathon 2009 set to run
come rain or
shine/Daily
Star
Drug
Dealer Killed in Shootout with Army in Baalbek
/Naharnet
U.S. to Cooperate with
Lebanese Government But Not With Hizbullah Ministers
/Naharnet
Intifada at Palestinian
Camps in Tyre Ahead of Abbas' Visit to Beirut
/Naharnet
1,757 Officers Dealing with Nightmarish Traffic in Beirut
/Naharnet
Britain Denies any Change in Policy toward Hizbullah
/Naharnet
Iran Backs Hariri
Government, Jalili Meets Hizbullah, AMAL Officials in Damascus
/Naharnet
Al-Rahi: Country Needs
Unified Defense Authority, Aoun Gave Logical Explanations to Bishops/Naharnet
Nicolas wants MOU-inspired
relationship with Jumblat/Now
Lebanon
Fayyad calls Hezbollah’s platform
purely political, moderate/Now
Lebanon
MP.Sakr:
STL irrelevant to Hariri-Assad meeting/Now
Lebanon
Elie Aoun: Druze
“injustice” spurs Jumblatt rhetoric/Now
Lebanon
U.S. Lawmakers Urge
Hizbullah's Disarmament, Express Fear Over Confrontation with Israel
Naharnet/Thirty-one members of the U.S. House of Representatives have
urged the Obama administration to work toward disarming Hizbullah and
preventing Iran from using the Shiite group in any confrontation with
Israel. In a letter sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the
lawmakers said the U.S. government should ensure greater accountability
from the United Nations in enforcing Resolution 1701. "In light of the
clear violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, we ask what
actions the Administration is taking to ensure the U.N. addresses these
violations," the letter reads. "We must seek to support stronger
multilateral efforts to disarm Hizbullah and clear southern Lebanon of
Iranian weapons."
The letter notes that the Obama administration has requested $210
million for UNIFIL and $100 million in military assistance for the
Lebanese army. "For that much money, American taxpayers deserve to see
results," the lawmakers said. The letter warned that Tehran may try to
distract the international community from its nuclear program by
inciting Hizbullah into carrying out militant activities in southern
Lebanon and blowing up the regional situation. The members of the House
of Representatives said that in light of the increasing number of
incidents in southern Lebanon and the capture of an Iranian arms ship
allegedly destined for Hizbullah, they are highly concerned by the
potential of Iranian-sponsored escalation along the Lebanese-Israeli
border.The letter, which was sponsored by Mark Kirk and Steve Israel,
said the situation in southern Lebanon became worse after the 2006 war.
It added that the newly formed Lebanese cabinet gave Hizbullah veto
power over major decision-making. Beirut, 05 Dec 09, 08:41
U.S. to Cooperate with Lebanese Government But Not With Hizbullah
Ministers
Naharnet/Washington said the U.S. will cooperate with the Lebanese
government but not with Hizbullah Cabinet ministers.
"There is no obstacle to cooperation with any official in the Lebanese
government with the exception of Hizbullah," said Nicole Shampaine, the
Director of the Department of State's Near East Affairs Bureau Office
for Egypt and the Levant.
In an interview published Friday by the daily As-Safir, Shampaine said
Hizbullah's first manifesto in 1985 "put a higher priority on the issue
of an Islamic state in Lebanon", whereas the new political document was
"more an attempt to show force in the face of the United States and
Israel." Shampaine wondered whether the document "will help make
progress towards peace and security in the region, including the people
of Lebanon." She renewed Washington's support for Prime Minister Saad
Hariri's government, saying: "It's totally up to him to decide where he
wants to go and when he wants to go." "We will not interfere in his
(Hariri's) visit to Damascus … Lebanon is an independent country,"
Shampaine stressed. Beirut, 04 Dec 09, 07:48
Qabbani Phones Sfeir, Says Christian-Muslim Equal Powersharing Not to Be
Undermined Under Any Alibi
Naharnet/Grand Sunni Mufti of Lebanon Sheikh Mohammed Rashid Qabbani on
Friday called for "putting aside the controversial political issues --
especially in the current time, because those issues divide the Lebanese
-- and that would be in favor of the national consensus atmosphere after
forming the government." The Mufti phoned Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah
Sfeir congratulating him on returning safely from his visit to the
Vatican. The two religious leaders stressed during the phone call upon
"the common national stances that guarantee Lebanon's unity."Qabbani
warned of "divisions" that are like "holes in the wall of national
unity" and that block the path of the government "preventing it from
achieving the citizen's social and economical aspirations.""The Taef
Accord must be implemented in text and spirit upon the rule of
consensus. The equal Muslim-Christian powersharing should not be
undermined under any alibi," added Qabbani. Qabbani condemned Tripoli's
latest security incidents and asked the security forces to fortify their
efforts to preserve security all over Lebanon. Beirut, 04 Dec 09, 16:58
Britain Denies any Change in Policy toward Hizbullah
Naharnet/British Foreign office spokesman, Barry Marston, denied any
change in his government foreign policy toward Hizbullah. His remarks
were made in response to comments attributed to British Foreign
Secretary David Miliband in an interview with a local newspaper in which
he said the U.K. will resume talks with Hizbullah. "The past few months
witnessed a number of contacts and meetings with members of Hizbullah,
but there is no plan to change this policy or step up contacts with the
party," Marston said. Beirut, 04 Dec 09, 07:33
Najjar Wants to Improve Financial Situation of Judges
Naharnet/Justice Minister Ibrahim Najjar has unveiled that a meeting
will be held with judicial officials to find ways to develop the
judicial system and at the same time improve the conditions of judges.
Najjar told An Nahar and As Safir newspapers, however, that the meeting,
which was scheduled to be held on Saturday, was postponed pending the
holding of the vote of confidence session.The minister said that a judge
cannot be held accountable if he isn't getting the allowances that he
deserves. Beirut, 05 Dec 09, 09:45
Security Source: Roumieh Prison Full of Problems
Naharnet/A high-level security source told al-Liwaa newspaper that
strong measures should be taken to reorganize Roumieh prison, which is
Lebanon's largest.
The prison, which lies east of Beirut, has seen several mutinies in the
past years. The source acknowledged that the jail was full of problems.
He said, however, that measures were taken against two inmates, who on
Wednesday opened their cells and assaulted another prisoner.The three
prisoners were put in solitary confinement, the source added. Beirut, 05
Dec 09, 10:06
Hariri to Visit Syria after Government Gains Vote of Confidence
Naharnet/Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Friday said he will conduct
visits to a number of Western and Arab countries, including Syria, after
his government gains the Parliament's vote of confidence. In a chat with
reporters, Hariri said: "We look positively at the step of establishing
embassies in the two countries (Lebanon and Syria), and we have to
change things in a positive manner, especially that we tried to change
using negative means and we did not reach any result." Answering a
question about the ministers who voiced reservations on article six of
the ministerial Policy Statement, Hariri said: "I'm an honest person, if
I wanted to personally voice reservation, I would've done so. But the
truth is that even the ministers who voiced reservation will have to
defend the ministerial statement and the government at every stake."
"This is the basis of the State's image and credibility, and any
reservation may be recorded inside the cabinet, but outside the cabinet,
each minister has to defend the government," added Hariri. Hariri said
the government will have to adapt with the requirements of the coming
period, which is a period of openness toward all political factions.
"There are the reconciliations that happened under the auspices of
President Michel Suleiman, and all of that leads toward a consensus
atmosphere in the country, especially regarding the controversial issues
and government's priorities," added Hariri. Hariri said he agrees with
President Suleiman "on all matters", adding that President Suleiman is
the president of "all of Lebanon." "Each of us has his jurisdiction, and
no one should try to stir a dispute between us, especially that the
president represents me and all the Lebanese in all international
forums," added Hariri. On the other hand, Hariri denied the reports
about a trip to the United States, clarifying that "the visit was
possible but still undecided." Beirut, 04 Dec 09, 19:28
Fadlallah: Some Parties Continue to Oppose Consensus
Naharnet/Hizbullah MP Hassan Fadlallah accused some parties of being
against understanding among Lebanese although he stressed that there has
been consensus on the policy statement among strong parliamentary blocs.
He said the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc would discuss the statement
during a three-day session in parliament starting Tuesday with a spirit
of understanding. Fadlallah also criticized any cooperation between the
U.S. and Lebanon "because we don't believe that the American
administration is keen on the interest, peace, stability and prosperity
of the economy in Lebanon." In response to the U.S. stance of not
dealing with Hizbullah ministers in the Lebanese unity cabinet, the
lawmaker said that the Shiite party already has no contact with
Washington which is "the basic supporter of Israeli aggression." Beirut,
05 Dec 09, 11:18
Tripoli MPs Call for Stronger Measures to Prevent Security Incidents
Naharnet/Tripoli MPs on Saturday condemned the latest incidents in Abi
Samra district and said there is no political or non-political cover to
anyone who makes disturbances in the northern port city. During their
weekly meeting, the lawmakers asked security forces to impose order and
remove "security areas" which give the impression that the state is
absent. The MPs also urged judicial authorities to impose the law on
everybody and pursue violators. The conferees tasked MP Mohammed Abdel
Latif Kabbara and Ahmed Karami with following up the issue with security
and judicial authorities. Beirut, 05 Dec 09, 11:58
1,757 Officers Dealing with Nightmarish Traffic in Beirut
Naharnet/Lebanon's new cabinet ministers may lock horns on many
political issues but they seem to agree on one thing: the need to
resolve an increasingly nightmarish traffic situation.
Starting Saturday morning, the number of officers tasked with regulating
traffic in Greater Beirut rose from 400 to 1,757 on the occasion of the
upcoming holidays.
Interior Minister Ziad Baroud told As Safir that the issue of traffic is
affecting all life aspects of the Lebanese. He put the blame on week
road networks and chaotic driving.
"The first step in getting ready for the end of year holiday season is
dealing with our traffic," Brigadier General Joseph Doueihy, who is in
charge of traffic regulations in Beirut, said on Friday.
The issue is at the top of Prime Minister Saad Hariri's agenda, whose
first stint as a statesman is bogged down by citizens' complaints of
impossible traffic across the capital and its environs.
Frustrated drivers are late to work, run out of gas in hours-long
traffic, or have to be towed out of flooded roads with the early winter
rains.
Bumper-to-bumper traffic is expected to only worsen as the New Year
nears, with a record number of visitors hitting the streets in the
country which expects to host a record two million tourists by the end
of 2010, according to tourism ministry figures. While Lebanon has
introduced road safety measures in recent years, such as traffic lights,
electricity is rationed and often leaves the streets, and drivers, in
the dark.(AFP-Naharnet) Beirut, 05 Dec 09, 09:11
Intifada at Palestinian Camps in Tyre Ahead of Abbas' Visit to Beirut
Naharnet/Scores of Fatah officers have launched an uprising against the
movement's National Security Forces official in Lebanon Brig. Gen. Adib
al-Hassan to protest a new shake-up within the military ranks in the
Palestinian refugee camps of Tyre. Sources close to the protestors told
As Safir daily that their "Intifada" came after al-Hassan gave
leadership responsibilities to a single commander rather than having
three people in charge of security at each camp. As Safir said the
officers held talks at one of Fatah's headquarters at Rashidiyeh camp
and decided to refuse the shake-up which "limits their authorities."
However, al-Hassan retaliated by withdrawing their allowances. The
sources told the newspaper that there are around 600 Fatah officers in
camps in the Tyre area in southern Lebanon, including 400 in Rashidiyeh.
As Safir said that the conferees sent a letter of protest to Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas, the Central Committee and the movement's
leadership urging the Fatah chief to "immediately interfere to solve the
situation before it goes out of hand."
The letter also said that the officers lack social and administrative
needs and are suffering because of "al-Hassan's moody
stances."Furthermore, the conferees accused al-Hassan of being
responsible for what they called a chaos within the ranks of the
National Security Forces-Lebanon. Abbas will make a brief visit to
Lebanon on Monday for talks with President Michel Suleiman on bilateral
relations and the plight of Palestinian refugees. During his visit Abbas
will also discuss the Middle East peace process and the rebuilding of
the Nahr al-Bared refugee camp in northern Lebanon. Beirut, 05 Dec 09,
08:05
Drug Dealer Killed in Shootout with Army in Baalbek
Naharnet/A prominent drug dealer from the Zoaiter clan was killed Friday
and his son wounded in a shootout with Lebanese troops in Baalbek.
State-run National News Agency identified the victim as Hosni Zoaiter.
It said Zoaiter opened fire on Lebanese soldiers during a chase in the
Baalbek town of Kneisseh, prompting troops to return fire. Zoaiter was
instantaneously killed and his son was wounded, NNA reported. Beirut, 04
Dec 09, 13:20
Mental problems untreated in Lebanon
Josh Wood, /December 5, 2009
Now Lebanon/While the physical remnants of war in Lebanon are clearly
visible in the pox-marked walls and abandoned buildings in almost every
neighborhood, the invisible damage created by the country’s prolonged
experience with violence has largely remained ignored. For most people
who suffer from depression or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD),
associated with the decades of violence in Lebanon, mental health
services are out of reach. Private psychiatrists are rare in Lebanon and
expensive. NGOs providing free psychosocial services are few and far
between. Even if such healthcare is readily available and affordable,
those with metal health problems face another hurdle: the stigma
associated with seeking help.
According to studies by the American University of Beirut, rates of PTSD
and depression reach a staggering 30% in some areas of southern Lebanon.
According to a study by the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian
refugees (UNRWA), 37% of Palestinian women and 19% of Palestinian men in
Lebanon suffer from depression.
Despite the prevalence of mental health problems in the country, there
are currently no government programs that adequately address the
situation.
“As far as I’m concerned, the government has nothing [for mental
healthcare] in Lebanon,” said Dr. Laila Farhood, a professor of
psychiatry at AUB and one of the country’s top experts on mental health.
Those suffering from mental illness are forced to seek help from private
doctors, though Farhood noted that only “the highly educated and
affluent” can afford to go to private mental healthcare providers.
The rest rely on NGOs that offer medicine and counseling, if they have
access. And while organizations offering mental health services flooded
into Lebanon in the wake of the 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel,
many have since moved on.
One that has stayed is Medicins Sans Frontiers (Doctors Without Borders,
MSF), which opened a free mental healthcare clinic in the southern
Beirut suburb of Bourj al-Barajneh in 2008. Bourj al-Barajneh is the
site of Beirut’s largest Palestinian refugee camp and many neighborhoods
of poor Shia who immigrated to the city; both populations have long
experiences with war.
One of the main goals of MSF’s pilot project in Bourj al-Barajneh is to
eliminate the stigmas surrounding seeking treatment for mental illness.
“People assume that having depression or anxiety is having a weakness;
that it’s an inability to deal with things,” said MSF field coordinator
Edgardo Zuniga.
Zungia stressed that MSF is trying to show that mental healthcare should
be integrated with primary healthcare and said that the organization is
doing its best to educate the public about the realities and severity of
mental illnesses.
Other institutions offering free mental healthcare include IDRAAC, based
at St. Georges Hospital in Beirut; Doctors of the World, which operates
in the Bidawi and Nahr al-Bared refugee camps; and Restart, a
Tripoli-based program that rehabilitates those who have witnessed
violence and torture.
But even if they can afford private doctors or live near an NGO that
offers free mental healthcare services, seeking psychiatric help is not
a priority for many Lebanese. “Perhaps Lebanese have to worry about
their physical and economic situation before their mental health,” said
Farhood, noting, however, that poverty is a strong contributor to
depression.
One upside is that despite the higher-than-normal rates of PTSD and
depression in Lebanon, there are fewer suicides here than in most
countries. Farhood attributes this to strong, intimate social support
networks – a safeguard against the absolute desperation and alienation
that can lead to suicide.
Also, rates of depression and PTSD can sometimes change over time.
According to Farhood, studies conducted by AUB in South Lebanon found
that PTSD rates dropped in 2007 from where they were in 2005. This
information is surprising given the relative calm in the area in 2005 –
five years on from the Israeli withdrawal and one year before the
devastation of the 2006 war. “People felt empowered; they were able to
prevent Israel from occupying their towns,” said Farhood.
Despite such changes, the root causes beneath both depression and PTSD
in Lebanon continue to go untreated. There is a consensus among mental
health professionals in the country that education campaigns to
eradicate the taboos about seeking psychiatric help should expand along
with an increase in the availability of mental healthcare services.
Majdalani: “Contradictions” color Ministerial Statement, Hezbollah
December 5, 2009
Now Lebanon/Lebanon First bloc MP Atef Majdalani told New TV on Saturday
that he thinks Article 6 of the Ministerial Statement – which pertains
to Hezbollah’s arms - is “contradictory” and that “he has reservations
with it because it gives the Lebanese army and Hezbollah the same
powers.”Majdalani questioned whether “the clause strengthens or weakens
Lebanon.”The minister also said Hezbollah is contradicting itself for
approving UN Security Council Resolution 1701 because it prohibits any
entity - except the state - from holding arms.
Majdalani said the parliament will “unanimously” give the vote of
confidence to the government, warning that “if any coalition wants to
refrain from doing so, it should withdraw its ministers from the
cabinet.”According to the minister, the government will make “historical
and important achievements,” if there is a real willingness to find
solutions to the problems facing the Lebanese. For Majdalani, the date
of Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s visit to Syria is not important; he said
that what matters is the willingness to establish “the best relations
with Syria.”
He also said that Hariri will visit Syria as Lebanon’s prime minister,
and does not have personal motives tied to the trip.-NOW Lebanon
Sakr: STL irrelevant to Hariri-Assad meeting
Now Lebanon/December 5, 2009
In an interview published in Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai on Saturday,
Lebanon First bloc MP Okab Sakr said that Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s
visit to Syria, which will happen after the cabinet receives the vote of
confidence, has nothing to do with the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. He
described the visit as “strategically significant,” since it would lay
the foundation for cooperation, balance and equality between Lebanon and
Syria, adding that he expects the visit to happen soon. “Hariri said
that he will be satisfied with any verdict issued by the STL,” Sakr
said, voicing hope that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad would share a
similar opinion, “especially because he considers himself innocent.”He
added that Assad previously described the March 14 alliance as an
“Israeli product,” however, he said - regardless of that statement -
Hariri’s visit could be likened to the president “shaking hands” with
the alliance itself. Sakr said that many matters are up for discussion
between Hariri and Assad, however, he added that “the aim of the visit
is to launch a new atmosphere, that is why, not all pending issues
between the two countries will be finalized.” -NOW Lebanon
Fayyad calls Hezbollah’s platform purely political, moderate
Now Lebanon/December 5, 2009
Loyalty to the Resistance bloc MP Ali Fayyad told LBCI television on
Saturday that Hezbollah’s political platform, announced on Monday, is
“purely political… it reflects a moderate position and it preserves
Hezbollah’s principles.”He said the platform’s vision for the Lebanese
state is stronger than the Taif Accord’s vision, adding that all parties
should remain committed to applying the Taif. Concerning the Palestinian
conflict, the MP said the party’s platform aims to reflect Hezbollah’s
support for the Palestinian people, and calls on everyone to join the
cause to help them.-NOW Lebanon
Elie Aoun: Druze “injustice” spurs Jumblatt rhetoric
December 5, 2009 /Now Lebanon/
Democratic Gathering bloc MP Elie Aoun told Kuwaiti newspaper An-Nahar
in an interview published Saturday that Progressive Socialist Party
leader MP Walid Jumblatt’s demand to break the link between religion and
political position comes as a result of the “injustices” endured by the
Druze sect. Earlier in the week, Jumblatt called for several reforms:
the formation of a senate, the adoption of an electoral law based on
proportionality and the right of anyone from any religion to occupy the
post of president, who is traditionally Maronite; the premier, who is
traditionally Sunni; and the speaker, who is Shia. Aoun said Speaker
Nabih Berri also has a right to propose the issue of eliminating
political sectarianism because he wants to continue implementing the
Taif Accord. The minister also commented on Hezbollah’s new
political platform, recognizing noticeable progress in the party’s
speech after it “Lebanized” its political rhetoric. Aoun said
Hezbollah’s talk of partnership, its recognition of the Lebanese army
and its role in protecting Lebanon, constitute a new approach to
national defense and needs to be discussed in the National Dialogue.
-NOW Lebanon
Nicolas wants MOU-inspired relationship with Jumblatt
December 5, 2009 /Now Lebanon/In an interview with Al-Manar television
on Saturday, Change and Reform bloc MP Nabil Nicolas said the Free
Patriotic Movement wants its relationship with Progressive Socialist
Party leader MP Walid Jumblatt “to be similar to the Memorandum of
Understanding that was reached between the FPM and Hezbollah.”
The minister added that Jumblatt’s return to his father’s principles has
brought the FPM closer to the PSP leader, a possible reference to
Jumblatt’s split from the March 14 alliance over the summer. Nicolas
also said current cooperation between the PSP and the FPM could resolve
the issue of the displaced. He said Jumblatt has to reassure the
displaced to return to their villages, and the state needs to provide
the money and infrastructure to carry it out. -NOW Lebanon
Abu Assi: The state cannot work in duality
Date: December 5th, 2009/Source: Free Lebanon
Secretary General of National Liberal party Elias Abu Assi said Saturday
that the state cannot perform in duality, considering that dialogue is
required especially in issues of disagreement.
Abu Assi told Free Lebanon radio station that there are two points of
views regarding the resistance: “some look at Hizbullah as a group
seeking for political gains, while others think of it as a necessity as
long as the land is occupied,” describing the second opinion as
non-convincing. He expressed his resentment that ‘some do not want to
discuss the issue of resistance arms or reach an agreement regarding its
fate,’ linking MP Michel’s Aoun visit to Bkirki with the announcement of
Hizbullah’s political manifesto. Abu Assi wished that the relations with
Syria would be based on ‘awareness and openness.’
Interview with Dr. Samir Geagea from Al-Akhbar newspaper
December 4, 2009
On December 4, Al-Akhbar newspaper carried the following report by
Thaaer Ghandour:
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea stressed that an understanding of
the Lebanese reality and the protection of the country were linked to
the regional arena and especially the Iranian nuclear program, which was
why it was necessary to distance Lebanon from this conflict. He then
corroborated that the relations with Saad Hariri were excellent and that
“Syria is the one that approached March 14, not the other way around.”
However, Geagea expressed concerns, saying, “Lebanon is being placed in
the eye of the storm, but the country is doing well.
The situation in the Middle East region is not sound. There is a lot of
tension along the Western-Iranian axis, but this does not necessarily
settle the issue of whether or not Iran has the right to acquire nuclear
arms. Unfortunately however, the issue is no longer limited to Iran and
the West and has reached China and Syria.
The sustainment of the regime in the Islamic Republic has become linked
to these nuclear arms. Therefore, the theory saying that Iran will
maneuver, [get] earn gains then relinquish its program is false. Iran
will proceed with its program, whether calmly or fast, which will entail
a military clash in the region. However, it is too early to define which
sides will engage in this conflict, recognizing that Hezbollah, which is
a key component of the nation, will be implicated one way or another.
This is what I mean when I say that Lebanon is in the eye of the storm.
As an official, I believe that Lebanon should be distanced from the
dangerous developments in the region. Some perceive this inclination as
being isolationist.
In ancient times, human beings used to sit still to avoid the attack of
a fierce animal. Therefore, in order to avoid an attack from Israel, we
must calm down. No one is entitled to make any sudden moves.”
Geagea was asked, “But is Hezbollah not calm?” to which he replied, “We
must respect Resolution 1701 and implement it verbatim. We must earn an
international consensus over our commitment, which is not available for
the time being.” He then denied that the Lebanese Forces were counting
on the American-Israeli project.
“What I said about Iran is not my reading alone. It is a reading that is
heard in the ranks of many sides, including study centers around the
world.” But why does Geagea always put himself in a confrontation with
Hezbollah? He does not deny it, saying, “Hezbollah is the one proposing
initiatives and political projects in the country and one only engages
in confrontations or alliances with the side playing the biggest role.
Today, Hezbollah is the biggest player, not the Mourabitoun. There are
many parties but their positions are traditional and non-influential.
However, Hezbollah can take the country 180 degrees left or right by any
step it makes. It is therefore necessary to follow its action,
especially since it can lead the entire country toward the abyss,
whether knowingly or unknowingly, based on good intentions or bad
intentions. Hezbollah has its reading and we have ours.”
Geagea refused to discuss Hezbollah’s document in full, stating, “I am
still reading it. I would like to read it thoroughly. However, I would
also like to comment on one point, that of Wilayat al- Faqih [the
Authority of the Jurisprudent]. What Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said about
the Wilayat al-Faqih being a religious and ideological issue solely is
not true. Wilayat al-Faqih is everything.
It is not related to one aspect of a believer’s life, rather to his
entire life and that of the community which politics is part of.
Based on that the Wali al-Faqih hold the political decision in the
nation and is the one to settle all issues after consulting with the
scholars in this or that area. If I were to imagine him today, the Wali
al-Faqih would adopt his decisions based on the interests of the nation,
i.e. on the interests of one billion Muslims, thus placing the interests
of the nation above any others and above those of the four million
Lebanese people. This is where we disagree with Hezbollah. To us, the
interests of the four million Lebanese are above all others.”
Asked whether or not he will visit Syria, Samir Geagea answered in a
diplomatic way, saying, “I do not hold an official position such that I
visit Syria. I cannot visit Syria unless the Lebanese state were to
settle all the pending issues with Damascus, namely the dossier of the
missing, the Syrian military bases under Palestinian cover in Lebanon…
and the demarcation dossier, especially in Shebaa.” He added that Syria
adopted many steps to overcome the Western threat that was imposed on
it, saying, “We did not head in Syria’s direction as some of its allies
are saying. Syria was the one which grew closer to us.” He was also
asked, “You say that March 14 is still present?” to which he answered,
“March 14 is still present and is stronger than ever. The proof of that
is the fact that it won all the unionist and university elections.
[Walid Jumblatt’s] supporters are still part of it and they have backed
the March
14 candidates in many universities and unions.” On the other hand,
Geagea did not deny the obstruction of the translation of these
victories since the parliamentary elections until this day, due to
numerous developments, saying however, “When your feet are on the
ground, the translation of these victories can be done at any point in
time. Our bases are unchanged, although I will not conceal the fact that
they are concerned. Nonetheless, at the level of the top, the meetings
of the general secretariat are sufficient.”
Equal power sharing
between Muslims, Christians should remain - Qabbani
Mufti warns political divisions could shatter national unity
By Elias Sakr
Daily Star staff
Saturday, December 05, 2009
BEIRUT: Equal sharing of power between Christians and Muslims should not
be altered, said the mufti of the Republic, Sheikh Mohammad Rashid
Qabbani on Thursday. The statement comes as an ongoing debate over
Speaker Nabih Berri’s call to form a committee tasked with abolishing
political sectarianism continued on Friday as the mufti of the Republic,
Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani, underlined that equal sharing of power
between Christians and Muslims shouldn’t be changed under any
circumstances.
“The Taif Accord should be implemented in spirit and record based on the
rule of consensus and the equal sharing of power between Muslims and
Christians, which should not be touched under any circumstances,”
Qabbani said. hinder the work of the government toward achieving the
Lebanese expectations of progress on social and economic issues.
“Discussion of controversial political issues should be postponed,
particularly under the current circumstances, in order to preserve the
atmosphere of consensus and avoid instigating schism among the
Lebanese,” Qabbani said.
Berri’s call to form a committee tasked with abolishing political
sectarianism had raised a heated debate in the media, as Christian
figures from March 14 rejecting the proposal, saying the circumstances
were not favorable. The Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Butros Sfeir
recently emphasized that sectarianism should be abolished from “people’s
hearts, before legal texts.”
During a phone conversation with Sfeir on Friday, Qabbani stressed with
the patriarch the importance of their unified national stances, which
constitute a guarantee for Lebanon’s unity, as well as their united
efforts to preserve the country’s safety and stability. For its part,
the Future Movement had linked abolishment of political sectarianism to
the full implementation of the Taif Accord, including the spread of the
state’s authority over all national territory and the disarmament of all
militias.
Berri argued that the formation of the national committee did not
necessarily mean the abolishment of political sectarianism, but rather
discussions over the issue since the process could necessitate decades
before reaching an agreement.On Friday, Beirut MP Hani Qobeissi, from
Berri’s parliamentary bloc, said that changes to legislation should
precede changes to people’s mentality, stressing that the Taif Accord
had been ratified, but was still to be fully implemented.
“It’s Parliament’s constitutional responsibility to start discussing the
formation of a national committee tasked with abolishing political
sectarianism as stated by the Taif Accord, which Berri is observing,”
Qobeissi said. Also, in a joint statement that was issued on Friday,
Amal and Hizbullah voiced support for Berri’s stance, saying that it was
based on legal and national principles. In an address last month,
President Michel Sleiman stressed that the process should be in
accordance with the Taif Accord’s clauses and based on consensus while
not contradicting the principles of coexistence and equal sharing of
power between Muslim and Christians.
Mufti Qabbani has also praised the last series of reconciliations
between political parties since it promoted harmony within the Cabinet
and would facilitate its efforts after it receives a vote of confidence
from Parliament. Last month, Sleiman hosted two reconciliation meetings
at Baabda Palace: one that joined Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel
Aoun and Progressive Socialist Party head Walid Jumblatt, and another
that brought together Jumblatt and Marada Movement leader Suleiman
Franjieh, a close ally of Syria.
Jumblatt had moved toward a centrist position after his withdrawal from
the March 14 alliance following the June 7 parliamentary elections,
while maintaining his support for the majority and its leader, Prime
Minister Saad Hariri. The meeting between the PSP leader and Aoun led to
an agreement over the return of the Christian displaced from the Chouf
region
Discussions over Cabinet policy statement to be extended
Hariri says Damascus visit to take place after vote of confidence
By Elias Sakr and Nafez Qawas
/Daily Star staff
Saturday, December 05, 2009
BEIRUT: Three days of parliamentary debate over the Cabinet’s policy
statement scheduled to kick off next Tuesday are expected to be
extended, as Prime Minister Saad Hariri prepares for an upcoming visit
to Syria as part of a wider tour of several Arab states, Europe and
later the United States. Hariri said Friday that the visit would take
place after lawmakers vote confidence in the new national unity Cabinet,
while President Michel Sleiman is scheduled to hold talks with US
President Barack Obama on December 14.
With more than 55 MPs demanding the right to address the house so far
and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri’s announcement that he would set no
time frame to the MPs’ sessions, the discussions are expected to extend
to at Hariri said he would visit Syria after the Cabinet receives the
vote of confidence as part of a tour of several Arab capitals.
“Despite disagreements, we should seek fraternal ties with Syria,”
Hariri told reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut adding that “the
establishment of diplomatic ties between both countries was positive.”
In response to a question, Hariri denied that he objected to article six
of the ministerial statement, which mentions the right of the resistance
to liberate occupied Lebanese territory, adding that even ministers who
had expressed their reservations over the statement should defend it
following the vote of confidence.
Hariri also denied recent media reports claiming that he was also headed
for the US, saying that he would visit Washington at a later date, but
that the trip had yet to be scheduled.
Despite the belief that Christian members of the March 14 coalition will
reiterate their reservations about article six, the new Cabinet is
expected to receive a record level of support in the vote of confidence,
given its embracement of the country’s major political parties.
March 14 Christian parties have objected to the policy statement’s
including a clause that mentions the resistance’s right to liberate
occupied territories independently from the Lebanese Army. Article six
highlightsleast five days. Lebanon’s right to liberate its territories
by means of its resistance, army and its people.
On Friday, Minyeh MP Ahmad Fatfat, a member of March 14, called for the
full implementation of the Taif Accord and the spread of the state’s
sovereignty over all Lebanese territory, as well as the disarmament of
all militias that did not comply with constitutional norms or security
institutions.
“The call for cohabitation [between Hizbullah and the Lebanese Army]
would create a dangerous security duality and instigate complications
that will explode,” Fatfat said.
Separately, Energy Minister Gebran Bassil, from the Free Patriotic
Movement (FPM), said reservations over the statement only served “media
propaganda and electoral purposes.”
Bassil added that the statement mentioned the state’s right to monopoly
over the country’s political orientations, which should be enough to
eliminate any reason for objections over the statement. The FPM’s
allies, Hizbullah and Amal, issued a joint statement on Friday saying
that parties expressing their reservations about the ministerial
statement did not want a strong Lebanon capable of protecting itself.
“The conclusion of the ministerial statement is an essential step on the
right track and will not be hindered by non-influential parties that are
not part of a major national [political] understanding,” the statement
said.
Abou Jamra: FPM is
diclining in popularity
iloubnan.info - December 04, 2009
Change and Reform member Issam Abou Jamra stated on Friday that the
FPM’s popularity is declining and which is evident through the student
and union election results.
Abou Jamra pointed out that political parties could dissipated if one
individual took hold of all the decisions. During an interview with al-Nashra,
he said that Aoun's visits seem as a reconciliation initiative and not
an honest open-heart confrontation to clear out all unresolved matters
and come with positive results for the Lebanese people.
Realistic engagement with Hezbollah
Britain's decision to talk to Hezbollah is a nuanced move, but any call
for disarmament is likely to fall on deaf ears
James Denselow guardian.co.uk,
Friday 4 December 2009
David Miliband told the Lebanese Daily Star this week that he believed
"carefully considered contact with Hezbollah's politicians, including its MPs,
will best advance our objective of the group rejecting violence to play a
constructive role in Lebanese politics".
Hezbollah heads the opposition group in the newly formed national unity
government that took five months of political wrangling to agree upon. Engaging
with the Shia organisation could be a pragmatic attempt to consolidate the state
over the sub-state.
At first glance, Miliband's motives seem sound – if Hezbollah could be brought
further into the mainstream it would reduce the likelihood of renewed conflict
with Israel, allow for more pressure to be put on more radical sub-state groups
such as the al-Qaida offshoots in the country, and even put some daylight
between Hezbollah and its main backer, Iran.
There can be little doubt over the difficulty of this task. After all, Hezbollah
was originally an Iranian creation whose avowed intention in its 1985 first
manifesto was to create an Islamic republic. Yet over the years it has steadily
become more of a nationalist organisation centred around Lebanese politics as
reflected in its second manifesto. However, it still relies heavily on Iranian
and Syrian financial and military support and no doubt responds to issues of
mutual interest. Indeed, Iran recently pledged an increased $20m funding to
overseas groups, although AP reported that this included not only traditional
allies such as Hezbollah, but also groups that could "investigate American and
British human rights abuses".
As the cold war between Iran and the west continues, characterised by the cat
and mouse game around Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, rightwing pundits
rejoice about seemingly being proved right on the ineffectiveness of reaching
out to Iran. At present the engagement track seems shaky. In the same week that
President Obama announced that 30,000 more American troops will be deployed to
Iran's eastern neighbour, the US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, explained:
As Iran makes choices that seem to indicate that it is not at this stage ready
and willing to take up the offers on the engagement track then we will put
greater emphasis on the pressure track.
If the pressure track eventually leads to attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities,
Hezbollah's weapons suddenly become extremely important in gauging the Iranian
counter-strike.
It is in fact an attempt to disarm Hezbollah that actually lies at the heart of
Britain's strategy of low-level engagement. This was signalled earlier in the
year when the then Foreign Office minister Bill Rammell stated in March that "we
have reconsidered the position ... in light of more positive developments in
Lebanon". Miliband himself explained at the time how "we can make absolutely
clear our determination to see United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701,
which calls for the disbanding of militias among other things in Lebanon, taken
forward with real speed".
Yet Hezbollah's weapons are considered the ultimate red line. It was attempts at
disrupting the organisation's autonomous capabilities by the pro-west March 14
government in 2008 that led to Hezbollah taking over Beirut. The threat is
potent, although shrouded in secrecy; it is estimated that Hezbollah has the
capability to mobilise more than 40,000 fighters, the 2006 war provided evidence
of its adroit use of anti-tank and anti-ship weaponry, drone technology and
night-fighting capabilities. Israel remains more concerned over the range of the
rockets that have been resupplied to the group, with recent incidents of arms
caches exploding and Israeli intelligence infrastructure being uncovered raising
tensions over the "blue line".
If Miliband thinks that low-level engagement with Hezbollah on the basis of
disarming the group is going to work then he may have been surprised to hear how
even the pro-west March 14 alliance had backed off this demand as part of the
formation of the cabinet. AFP reported that Lebanese information minister Tarek
Mitri had affirmed the right of "Lebanon, its government, its people, its army
and its resistance" to liberate all Lebanese territory (ie the Shebaa farms).
Low-level engagement with Hezbollah reflects an acknowledgement of its powerful
position within the divided Lebanese state. However, calls for its disarmament
will fall on deaf ears unless a host of other factors occur beforehand. This is
not an argument against engagement, but a call for realism that understands that
simply agreeing to meet with your enemies does not give you the power to dictate
terms.
Lebanonizing Hezbollah or the obverse?
Friday, 4 December 2009,
Opinion: Franklin Lamb
Lebanonizing Hezbollah or the obverse? Updating Resistance projects
by Franklin Lamb,
Dahiyeh, South Beirut
Like many liberation and resistant movement ‘Manifestos’ ‘Charters’ or
‘Declarations’ issued to the public early in its founding - the African National
Congress, Palestine Liberation Organization , Hamas, Algerian FLN, and various
“Sons of Liberty” groups during the American Revolution, come to mind—Hezbollah
has been criticized by its detractors over the years for some language in its
1985 “Open Letter” manifesto. Some have urged Hezbollah to remove ‘controversial
language” such as the call for an Islamic Republic in Lebanon- even though the
Party has made clear that establishing an Islamic Republic of Lebanon is no
longer a priority and emphasizing that Lebanon’s diversity is respected, valued
and permanent. Others have called Hezbollah’s 1985 manifesto ‘too religious” and
too dogmatic for a broad international appeal political document.
Ideas for Hezbollah’s original 1985 Manifesto evolved over 30 months following
the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, during which the new resistance movement
worked to establish itself in the turbulent period of military invasions,
occupations and numerous internal and external conspiracies against it. Many
secret discussions were held concerning all manner of subjects including what
the new organization would be called. Many favored the name “The Islamic
Movement of Lebanon” but before the matter came up for a vote, another of the
more than 20 new local resistance groups preempted that name. Others thought the
name “Nation (Umma) of Hezbollah” was more inclusive. Under time pressure to
agree on a name before the “Open Letter” was to be issued, the name “Hezbollah”,
(“Party of God”) found in the Quran was agreed upon.
The Open Letter, addressed to “ The Downtrodden in Lebanon and in the World' was
published on February 16 1985, a date purposely chosen because it was the first
anniversary of the Israeli assassination, of the much loved pre-Hezbollah
resistance organizer Sheik Ragheb Harb, from the south Lebanon village of
Jibsheet.
Hezbollah first Manifesto was first read at the al-Ouzai Mosque, down the hill
and near the Mediterranean seashore, from the Shatila Palestinian refugee camp,
by one of the founders of Hezbollah, the official spokesman for the nascent
group, Sayeed Ibrahim Amin al-Sayyed, who has served for 28 years on its Shura
Council and today heads Hezbollah’s political council. Perhaps by coincidence,
on the same day that Hezbollah’s public manifesto was issued; Israel began a 10
week withdrawal from 168 towns and villages, comprising 55 percent of South
Lebanon.
(Comment: With respect to Shatila Camp and neighboring Burj al Barajneh camp—and
later Rashidiyye Camp down south in Tyre -it was several weeks following
Hezbollah ‘going public’ that the “War of the Camps” (May 1985-July 1988) would
cause more death and destruction to Palestinians than the Sabra-Shatila
Massacre. Despite pressure from their fellow Shia- the Amal militia- to join
them in attacking the Camps to settle plenty of still festering pre-1982 scores
from PLO abuses and crimes against the southern Shia, as well as to help Syria
eliminate pro-Arafat partisans and gain sole control of the “Palestinian Card”,
the newly organized Hezbollah insisted that its only enemies were the Israeli
occupiers, which it was busy attacking. At the same time it repeatedly
admonished Amal and Syria to end their assaults on Palestinian refugee camps.
Eventually Syria, under Soviet and Arab pressure, called a halt to the criminal
attacks, but to this day few Palestinians have forgiven it for this slaughter
which killed more than 4,000 and wounded close to 7,000. Like Amal, Syria does
not like to discuss this black chapter and some of its officials express regret
and shame.)
With its “Open Letter” declaration Hezbollah entered a new phase, shifting the
Party from secret resistance activity free from political or media interactions
into public political work.
As noted above, from the day it was promulgated, some have been advising the
Party to amend and ‘tone down’ the 1985 language which reflects a different
period of Lebanese history and international conflict. Others aver that we are
still in the same period only more deeply. The original Hezbollah manifesto
document reflects various views of the founders as well as the political
thinking of senior Shia cleric Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah. Some in Dahiyeh still
call Fadlallah “the father of Hezbollah” not for his active Party involvement
which has never existed Hezbollah sources attest (not withstanding his name on
the US terrorism list) but for his public speeches and sermons that inspired a
generation of Resistance fighters in Lebanon and the region and continue to do
so.
Need for a clearer view of the Resistance
Some critics have used the Introduction to Hezbollah’s 1985 “Open Letter” to
smear the Party as religious fanatics and appearing too ‘foreign’ and too
Iranian:
It reads: “We are often asked: Who are we, the Hezbollah, and what is our
identity? We are the sons of the umma (Muslim community) - the party of God (Hizb
Allah) the vanguard of which was made victorious by God in Iran. There the
vanguard succeeded to lay down the bases of a Muslim state which plays a central
role in the world. We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our
tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: Ruhollah
Musawi Khomeini. God save him!
By virtue of the above, we do not constitute an organized and closed party in
Lebanon. nor are we a tight political cadre. We are an umma linked to the
Muslims of the whole World by the solid doctrinal and religious connection of
Islam, whose message God wanted to be fulfilled by the Seal of the Prophets,
i.e., Muhammad. This is why whatever touches or strikes the Muslims in
Afghanistan, Iraq, the Philippines and elsewhere reverberates throughout the
whole Muslim umma of which we are an integral part. Our behavior is dictated to
us by legal principles laid down by the light of an overall political conception
defined by the leading jurist (wilayat al-faqih). As for our culture, it is
based on the Holy Koran, the Sunna and the legal rulings of the faqih who is our
source of imitation (marja' al-taqlid). Our culture is crystal clear. It is not
complicated and is accessible to all.
Some Party officials, as well as supporters, felt Hezbollah needed to issue a
new document that would provide a clearer and wider vision on the resistance and
its current political work and future social and ideological plan.
Against this backdrop, Hezbollah’s 7th Party Conference drafted a more
contemporary 32 page Manifesto reflecting 28 years of political maturity. Not to
recant its 25 year old “Open Letter” but rather to define issues not addressed
in the party’s first manifesto and to set its future political path for
“homeland of our fathers, ancestors, grandchildren, and the coming generations.
‘
The detailed document, in Four Parts, provides many specifics on how Hezbollah
plans to work with the new Unity Government to improve Lebanon and the lives of
its entire population.
Misleading main stream media reports
For many who rely on MSM reports such as offered by US and European ‘news
outlets’ a dramatically skewed view was presented the morning after yesterday’s
release of what Hezbollah’s new political program as a large news conference in
al Jinen Hall in Dahiyeh.
A typical MSM report on yesterday’s event:
Beirut, Lebanon (CNN) – “Hezbollah's chief on Monday announced the group's new
"manifesto," which calls on all countries to "liberate Jerusalem" and declares
the United States a threat to the world.
American terrorism is the source of every terrorism in the world," Hassan
Nasrallah said in a televised speech from an undisclosed location. Hezbollah, a
political party in Lebanon, is listed as a terrorist organization by the United
States and Israel.
Nasrallah does not appear in public amid concerns for his safety. "We invite and
call on all Arabs and Muslims and all countries keen on peace and stability in
the world to intensify efforts and resources to liberate Jerusalem from Zionist
occupation and to maintain its true identity and its Islamic and Christian
sanctities," Nasrallah said.
Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for numerous terrorist attacks. It has been
linked to attacks against American, Israeli and other Western targets….He
praised Iran and Syria, which are Hezbollah's chief backers”.
Only then is the reader advised that Hassan Nasrallah “also touched on domestic
issues.” In fact Hassan Nasrallah spoke for 80 minutes about domestic issues,
the subject of and reason for the new Hezbollah manifesto.
What the main stream media failed to report.
Hezbollah’s new political program calls for “The elimination of political
sectarianism as the main pre-condition to establish a true democracy as the Taif
Accord stipulated and the formation of a national council for this end.” The
Hezbollah manifesto blames sectarianism “for being a strong obstacle to
achieving a true democracy, whereby the elected majority can rule and the
opposition can exercise its role.”
Despite Hezbollah’s desire for a sectarian-free democracy, Nasrallah said that
until achieving it, his party accepts “consensus democracy” pursuant to the
Constitution and National Pact. “Consensus democracy is a suitable political
formula that ensures the participation of all parties,” he noted.
Focusing extensively on the domestic level, Hezbollah, acting as a fully fledged
political party, urged the implementation of administrative decentralization in
order to promote balanced developmental projects over all Lebanese territories.
It warned against the evolution of decentralization into any form of federalism
as he expressed the party’s opposition to any form of division, or masked
federalism.
"We want a government that works for its citizens and provides the appropriate
services in their education and medical care and housing to secure a decent life
and to address the problem of poverty and provide employment opportunities,” the
document reads. "We want a government that works to strengthen the role of women
in society and enhance their participation in all fields.”
Nasrallah outlined his party’s vision for the Lebanese state, saying it must
“guarantee public liberties, ensure national unity and protect its sovereignty
and independence with a strong and capable army.” He stressed the importance of
“modern” institutions, an economy built on agriculture and industry and a strong
judiciary.
Hezbollah’s new manifesto also calls for a modern electoral law with “accurate
electoral representation” and added that the state needs to cater to its
citizens’ needs, empower the youth and women and prioritize education.
The new document maps out the party’s policy on a national defense strategy,
saying that Lebanon needs to confront Israeli threats with a popular resistance
supported by the people and a national army that ensures the country’s stability
and security. "In the absence of strategic balance, the Israeli threat obliges
Lebanon to endorse a defensive strategy that depends on a popular resistance
participating in defending the country and an army that preserves the security
of the country -- in an integrated manner," added Hezbollah’s Secretary-General.
“Adopting the choice of the Resistance allowed Lebanon to achieve real
independence and safeguard its sovereignty,” he added.
Hezbollah’s new political manifesto emphatically declares that the Palestinians
have the right to resist through all forms, primarily armed struggle. It pledges
Hezbollah’s work with all the Lebanese parties to grant Palestinian refugees in
Lebanon “their civil and social rights,” while rejecting naturalization. It also
calls for “direct Lebanese-Palestinian dialogue.” Nasrallah cited the 2000
Israeli withdrawal from the South, their 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, the 2006
July War, the first and second Intifadas as well as the Hamas takeover of Gaza,
and the 2009 Gaza War as victories against Israel.
“We assure our constant and continuous support of the Palestinian people and
cause against Israel,” he added.
Hezbollah new manifesto also calls on “Arab leaders to review their agreements
with Israel and give up the idea of compromising with it, especially those who
gambled on US administration policies.” Nasrallah added that “Israel has proved
that is does not seek peace and uses negotiations to impose its conditions and
to achieve its gains.” Hezbollah hopes the Arab and Islamic countries would
“unite and commit to the liberation of the land and reject the alternatives of
naturalization of Palestinians.”
We call on the Arabs to set plans to liberate Palestinians in Israeli prisons,”
Nasrallah added.
In its new political declaration, Hezbollah discusses Lebanon’s foreign
relations, and calls for the country to “maintain its special relations with
Syria because it is a political, security and economic need dictated by the two
countries’ interests.” It declares that any “negative atmosphere” clouding these
relations must be removed”.
According to Hezbollah, Lebanon’s relations with Syria are part of the country’s
overall relations with the Arab world and its confrontation with Israel.
“Lebanon is Arab in nature and belonging” and added that its interests
“necessitate a commitment to just Arab causes.” He called some Arab countries’
disputes with Iran as a “stab to the back of Arab causes that only serves Israel
and the US.”
Hezbollah’s new manifesto also stresses the importance of cooperation between
Islamic countries and described Iran as an “important, central state in the
Islamic world… which supports resistance movements in our area and supports Arab
and Islamic causes.” He added that the “fabrications of contradictions” between
Iran and Arab countries is a “stab in the back to the Arab cause, which serves
only Israel and the US.”
As Hezbollah declares and initiates its outlined future work deep within the
Lebanese polity, initial Lebanese and international reactions appear positive
according to Hezbollah’s media office. The party now plans to enlist support for
its new manifesto, distributing copies north, east and west, while keeping many
eyes peeled along the southern border with occupied Palestine.
This morning’s Daily Star reports in an exclusive interview with David Miliband,
the UK’s Foreign Minister, that his country intends to increase contacts and
dialogue with Hezbollah’s politicians with European Union members considering
the same. Meanwhile, this morning’s Naharnet.com news bulletin reports that the
U.S. Embassy “has denied media reports that U.S .Assistant Secretary of State
for Near Eastern Affairs, Jeffrey Feltman will visit Beirut this week.”
According to the same report, “The embassy also denied an al-Markaziya news
agency's report that the Obama administration would most probably replace
Michele Sison as U.S. ambassador to Beirut”.
*************
Franklin Lamb is doing research in Lebanon and can be reached at fplamb@gmail.com
Hezbollah, Iran May Get 'Arm'
Inside U.N. Security Council
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
By Ben Evansky
Print ShareThisOn Jan. 1, 2010, Hezbollah and its de-facto ruler Iran could have
a direct line to the Security Council and gain access to all the confidential
information to which Security Council members are privy. In October the U.N.
General Assembly overwhelmingly voted for Lebanon to be the Asian bloc's new
non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council for a 2-year term.
Earlier today the Lebanese Government endorsed Hezbollah's demand allowing it to
keep its huge weapons arsenal. In doing so the Lebanese government is able to
maintain its shaky unity government in which Hezbollah, a designated terrorist
group by the U.S. state department, holds two ministries.
Critics worry that the Lebanese will essentially be sitting on the Security
Council while ignoring Security Council resolutions that call for the disarming
of armed militias, in other words Hezbollah. Analysts point to the influence
wielded by the Iranian-funded Hezbollah in Lebanon as a cause for concern over
Lebanon's acceptance into the Security Council. Walid Phares, a senior fellow at
the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and Fox News contributor on terrorism,
was one of the architects of U.N. Resolution 1559 which passed in 2004 and
called for the immediate disarmament of armed militias. Given the new structure
of the Lebanese government that now includes Hezbollah, he says the organization
will have "an arm and an eye inside the Security Council." Hezbollah's
acceptance of joining the national unity government came with a promise of not
having to disarm as well as receiving the power of veto following months of
complicated negotiations. While repeated calls to the Lebanese foreign ministry
in Beirut went unanswered, Lebanon's ambassador to the U.N., Nawaf Salam, was
recently quoted in reports as saying that once on the Security Council, Lebanon
would "work for a more just and democratic international system."
Hezbollah spokesman Ibrahim Moussawi told Fox News that he had no comment as to
what the organization wants from the Security Council and denied that his
organization was bound by U.N. resolutions that called for disarming militias,
telling Fox News that "the organization is not a militia" and to look at
Wednesday's announcement by the Lebanese government that leaves Hezbollah in
full control of its arms.
LinksLIVESHOTS: Lebanon & Hizbollah Up the Stakes
Phares says that one needs to look no further than the group that controls the
Lebanese foreign ministry: AMAL, the Lebanese Resistance Detachments. The small
Shiite party is strongly allied with Hezbollah. It holds influence over
Lebanon's foreign policy, which in turn gives Hezbollah enormous influence over
what goes on at places like Lebanon’s United Nations Mission.
The consequences of Lebanon's membership on the Security Council will be
far-reaching in two important areas says Phares: "It will be more difficult for
the council to disarm Hezbollah, and problematic in sanctioning Iran."