LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 06/09

Bible Reading of the day
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 15:21-28. Then Jesus went from that place and withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a Canaanite woman of that district came and called out, "Have pity on me, Lord, Son of David! My daughter is tormented by a demon." But he did not say a word in answer to her. His disciples came and asked him, "Send her away, for she keeps calling out after us." He said in reply, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." But the woman came and did him homage, saying, "Lord, help me." He said in reply, "It is not right to take the food of the children and throw it to the dogs." She said, "Please, Lord, for even the dogs eat the scraps that fall from the table of their masters." Then Jesus said to her in reply, "O woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish." And her daughter was healed from that hour.

Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special Reports
Release: ICC Calls on Pakistan's President Zardari to Defend Christians after Muslim Mob Ravages Two Towns in Pakistan 05/08/09
September this year. By: Elie Fawaz/Now Lebanon/August 5, 2009
With or without a war, Lebanon will still be picking up the pieces. The -Daily Star 05/08/09
We’re discovering the worst of Bush in Barack Obama.By Naomi Wolf 05/08/09

Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for August 05/09
Aoun: Jumblat Did Not Join Opposition but Is 'More than Welcome'-Naharnet
Jumblat From Baabda: Earlier Statements Were Misunderstood, I Won't Abandon Hariri and March 14 Principles-Naharnet
March 14 Warns against March 8 'Maneuvers' to Delay Government Formation-Naharnet
Wahhab: Damascus Road Open for Jumblat-Naharnet
British Foreign Office Minister Arrives in Lebanon
-Naharnet
Maronite Bishops: Delay in Government Shape-Up Unfortunate
-Naharnet
Lavrov: We Continue to Support Lebanon's Sovereignty and Stability
-Naharnet
Riyadh Tells Jumblat that his Stances Weaken Hariri and Saudi-Syrian Negotiations
-Naharnet
Israel FM Visits Divided Border Village-Naharnet
Hariri Rejects Personally Choosing Druze Ministers, Jumblat Might Travel to France
-Naharnet
Report: Hizbullah Tripled Number of Surface-to-Surface Rockets Since 2006
-Naharnet
Now Lebanon: Lebanese press round-up: August 5, 2009
Jumblatt: I did not and will not abandon PM-designate Hariri-NOW Lebanon 05/08/09
Security cabinet to mull Ghajar's future-Jerusalem Post
Barak: Beirut responsible for security of border-Daily Star
Israeli Defense establishment: Hand over northern Ghajar-Ynetnews
Israeli IDF: Northern calm in danger-Ynetnews
Hezbollah stockpiles 40000 rockets near Israel border-Times Online
Barak: PA will be examined after Fatah congress-Ynetnews
Reconnecting America and Syria-guardian.co.uk
Hezbollah cell to face court in Egypt-United Press International
Hezbollah reacts to Syrian sanctions-United Press International
IDF: Northern calm in danger-Ynetnews
Britain backs Syria-EU pact despite concerns-Washington Post
More Sydney terror plot charges-BBC News
Terrorism raids 'brought forward after leak'-ABC Online
HRW calls on Damascus to free top rights lawyer-Daily Star
Muslim Brotherhood linked to terrorists-By Inter Press Service
Australian police detain four for plotting suicide attack-Daily Star
UK minister presses Syria to promote Mideast peace-By Agence France Presse (AFP)
Hariri takes holiday as efforts to form cabinet stumble-Daily Star
Franjieh to visit Sfeir to shore up Christian reconciliation efforts-Daily Star
Geagea leaves Lebanon for summer vacation-Daily Star
UN’s Ban to ask for extension of UNIFIL mandate-Daily Star
Saudi Arabia may shut LBC offices over ‘sex’ talk show-By Agence France Presse (AFP)
Lebanese man arrested for spying for Israel-Daily Star  
Italy donates over $10 million to fund 12 new projects-Daily Star
Sidon holds urgent meeting to solve water crisis-Daily Star
A trail less-traveled: Hiking in Ehden-Daily Star


Security cabinet to mull Ghajar's future
By HERB KEINON/Jerusalem Post 
Aug 5, 2009
The security cabinet is likely to meet soon to discuss the fate of Ghajar, with Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman expected to give his recommendation on how Israel should deal with the northern town that straddles the Lebanese border. SLIDESHOW: Israel & Region | World In recent weeks, Lieberman - charged by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu with drawing up policy recommendations concerning the town - has signaled that he supports building a physical barrier on the international border that divides the city in half, and turning the northern part of the city over to UNIFIL control. Earlier this year, Israel indicated it was willing to negotiate with the UN over a pullback in Ghajar. A positive recommendation by Lieberman on this issue would be the first time an official at his level came out in favor of this idea. When the IDF pulled out of Lebanon in May 2000, the UN determined that the border ran through the middle of Ghajar. In the aftermath of the Second Lebanon War in 2006, Israel maintained a military presence in the northern part of the town and built a security fence around it.
Some 1,500 residents live in the northern part of the town, and another 500-700 are in the southern part, on the Israeli side of the border. An Israeli withdrawal would be in line with commitments it made as part of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which put an end to the 2006 fighting. UN, European and American officials have been urging Israel to move out of northern Ghajar to help bolster the moderates in Lebanon

ICC Calls on Pakistan's President Zardari to Defend Christians after Muslim Mob Ravages Two Towns in Pakistan
Washington, D.C. (August 4, 2009) - International Christian Concern (ICC) is calling on Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari to defend religious freedom by taking swift measures to prosecute the Muslim mobs that attacked Christian neighborhoods near Faisalabad, Pakistan, burning over 100 homes and killing at least eight Christians in two related attacks occurring on July 31 and August 1. The first riot began in Korian on Friday, July 31, a day after local Muslims accused a man of desecrating the Qur'an. Muslim clerics decried Talib's "blasphemy" and called for his death. A mob then gathered and looted and burned two churches and 75 of the 80 Christian houses in the village, setting up barricades to impede fire engines and burning alive domestic animals in the process.Unsatisfied with the wreckage of Korian, the clerics and several radical groups incited a second mob to gather in Gojra on Saturday morning. They advanced through the neighborhood shooting in the air, throwing chemical and petrol bombs on houses, and looting indiscriminately. The mob attacked the residence of the Bishop of the Church of Pakistan, and again set up barricades in the street to prevent firefighters from reaching the burning houses. Three churches were also destroyed.
Seven of those killed were from the same family, including two children. They lived in Gojra and were burnt alive as they tried to escape their house, which the Muslim mob - estimated to be at least three thousand strong - looted and then set alight. The last confirmed casualty was found in the ashes of his house, burnt nearly beyond recognition.
ICC sources indicate that 35 Christians were critically injured, and 45 women and children were missing after the attack.
Christians have experienced severe discrimination at the hands of the current provincial government before, which under Shahbaz Sharif refused to publish or act on an investigation into the burning of a Christian village in 1997. This has created an atmosphere of impunity, and if the highest authorities in Pakistan ignore the current incident it will lead to repeat attacks throughout the country. ICC urges all concerned parties to call the Embassy of Pakistan to express their opposition to this egregious violation of religious freedom and urge the President to take immediate action to prosecute the leaders of the mob, especially the radical clerics who called for the attacks.
Pakistan Embassies:
USA: (202) 243-6500
Canada: (613) 238-7881
UK: 0870-005-6967

Reconnecting America and Syria
Internet users could be among the first to benefit as the US prepares to dismantle trade sanctions
Sakhr al-Makhadhi guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 4 August 2009 19.30 BST Article historyAmerican officials are preparing to waive some of the sanctions against Syria imposed by the Bush administration, according to Imad Moustapha, the Syrian ambassador to Washington. First to go will be the ban on exports of spare parts and safety equipment for the Syrian civil aviation industry, followed by that on computer products. Crucially, this will mean Syrian internet users should be able to download software and buy goods and services online.
The only sticking point is that the rules will not be swept away with one signature in the Oval Office. Instead they will be handled on a case-by-case basis. But the US is hinting it will push through each individual waiver request without too much difficulty. There has been much talk of breaking the Syrian-Iranian alliance, but this move on sanctions is about more than international diplomacy and that old neocon favourite, winning hearts and minds. At present, Syrian internet users have to jump through hoops to do something as basic as downloading an update to a web browser. US companies do their best to enforce the sanctions law, by preventing their products reaching Syria. The change will make life easier for millions of people, although internet-freedom activist Jillian York says many have already found ways around the embargo:
Syrians have been circumventing the ban in numerous ways by sharing software for years, and the market is flooded with 'banned' tech products. Therefore, the ban was low-hanging fruit, so to speak – the easiest way to please a great number of people quickly. In easing the software ban, the US has chosen its target wisely. The first to benefit will be the young, tech-savvy middle classes. This is a vital constituency because they make up the majority of the Syrian blogosphere, which is becoming the country's most vocal segment of society.
The business community is excited too. Syria's economy has been slowly opening up over the past decade. But there is virtually no e-commerce, and part of the reason is because the infrastructure that companies need is off-limits. PayPal, Amazon and some web-hosting companies have been blocking all transactions from Syria. In some cases, even logging on to some websites from Syria can end up in your account being terminated. The painless act of lifting the technology ban could improve America's image on the internet, and help Syrian businesses end the country's economic isolation. The US will benefit as its firms gain access to an untapped market.
The other part of the deal – the agreement to end the aircraft sanctions – seems to be the result of pressure from one of America's biggest companies, Boeing. Syrianair has grounded most of its ageing fleet of American planes because it has not been allowed to buy essential parts. So where did it turn for replacement aircraft? Europe. Last year the airline is understood to have started negotiations to buy up to 50 planes from Boeing's biggest rival, Airbus. The deal still has not been finalised, but if it does go through, it will deprive the American economy of billions of dollars it desperately needs. These small changes to the embargo have the potential to benefit millions of Syrian internet users, help open up the economy and maybe even give America a massive cash windfall. But why not go all the way and revoke the entire sanctions law? Imad Moustapha claims that would require the assent of the US Congress, where President Barack Obama could run into difficulties. Instead, the plan seems to be to lift parts of the embargo one by one until the law becomes meaningless.

Minister Yossi Peled appointed responsible for former SLA members

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3755737,00.html
Published: 08.02.09, 13:42 / Israel News
The cabinet appointed Minister Yossi Peled as the responsible minister for care of former Southern Lebanese Army members in Israel.
Peled will head an inter-ministerial team that will address housing, employment, education, and citizenship needs of former SLA members living in Israel since 2000 when the IDF withdrew from Lebanon. Peled said, "The State of Israel has a moral obligation to the people of SLA, its allies, who fought alongside it shoulder to shoulder." (Roni Sofer)

Defense establishment: Hand over northern Ghajar
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3757314,00.html
Israel should hand over control over northern section of Lebanon border village to United Nations, defense establishment says; political sources estimate that move will be undertaken as part of US-led regional peace initiative
Roni Sofer Published: 08.05.09, 00:27 / Israel News
The defense establishment is recommending that Israel transfer control over the northern part of Ghajar – a village located on the Lebanon border – to the United Nations.
A report on the subject was handed over to Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who is expected to present his recommendations to the National Security Cabinet in the near future. Political officials estimate that handing over control of northern Ghajar will be part of the regional gestures aimed at advancing the US-led peace process.
The village of Ghajar is divided into two sections, but the IDF has maintained control over its northern part since the Second Lebanon War. In the wake of the war, military officials feared that the village, where some residents possess Israeli ID cards, will be used to facilitate Hezbollah terror activity.
Following President Barack Obama's election victory, the US has been eager to advance the issue. However, Israel refrained from taking a decision on the matter ahead of the recent Lebanese elections, as not to boost Hezbollah.
Although the area was taken from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War, both Damascus and Beirut currently claim that the Har Dov region on the northern border belongs to Lebanon.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is planning to discuss the issue in the coming weeks. The PM asked Foreign Minister Lieberman to prepare a report on the diplomatic implications of a hand over.
The issues currently examined by the Foreign Ministry include Israel's ability to monitor crossing points between the two parts of the village, UNIFIL's ability to prevent the entry of Hezbollah men into the area, and various legal issues involved in the matter.

Barak: PA will be examined after Fatah congress
Defense minister tells Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that alongside desire not to intervene in Palestinians' internal issues, they will be examined according to results of Fatah conference
Amnon Meranda Published: 08.04.09, 14:19 / Israel News
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3756984,00.html
The Israeli defense establishment is closely monitoring the Fatah congress, which is meeting in Bethlehem to decide on the Palestinian movement's future.
"We do not intervene in the Palestinians' internal issues," Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Tuesday. "We have allowed anyone who can arrive at the conference to do so, so that the decisions made there will have the broadest legitimization.
Nonetheless, the decisions will testify to the Palestinian side's readiness in terms of continuing the negotiations with Israel," the minister said, in light of reports that Fatah planned to add to update its platform a clause stating that it would not recognize Israel as the Jewish state.
Speaking at the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Barak noted that Israel would insist on keeping the settlement blocs as part of any solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as well a solution to the refugee issue outside the boundaries of the Jewish state.
"My suggestion is not to be too impressed by what will be said at the Fatah convention as part of the internal dialogue," he added. "We shouldn't ignore it and shouldn’t be too impressed. The real test will come after the convention – when a leadership is formed there and a proper amount of legitimacy, and then we will see what this leadership is willing to bring to the negotiation table."
According to the defense minister, it is important that a future agreement "reflects the end of the conflict and the lack of mutual demands between Israel and the Palestinians."
Barak clarified that the Israeli government's relations with the American administration continued to be close. "Important and tight relations are the foundation of Israel's foreign policy.
"We ascribe great importance to the relations with the United States on all aspects – in the political, security and economic fields. We are holding an intimate dialogue on a variety of issues, in a bid to set President Obama's plan for a comprehensive regional agreement in motion."
'Lebanon will be responsible for escalation'
Barak reiterated the Israeli stance that Syria was helping terror organizations, despite its willingness to resume peace talks with Israel.
"Syria is helping Hezbolla arm as well. It sponsors the terror headquarters in Damascus, he said, but added that "making progress with Syria could also lead to positive results in terms of progress with Lebanon in the future."
Addressing Hezbollah's rearming, the defense minister clarified that as far as Israel was concerned, there was only one element responsible for what is taking place on Lebanese territory.
"We shall not accept an attempt to distinguish between the responsibility of the Hezbollah organization and the Lebanese government. A future escalation will be Lebanon's responsibility, as it is not implementing (Security Council) Resolution 1701 and additional decisions on disarming Hezbollah. Israel will see itself at liberty to act, with all it entails," Barak said.
The Iranian nuclear issue was also discussed during the meeting, and Barak said that Israel would not dictate to the Americans how to act on the issue. "But we do recommend setting a tight timetable," he said, "with milestones and an organizing cooרrdinated sanctions, in case the dialogue fails to yield the desired results."
The minister expressed his pessimism over the chance that negotiations would prompt Iran to abandon its nuclear aspirations.
"Past experience has taught us that such things have not succeeded. In my previous roles I have seen the past experience with Pakistan and North Korea, and the similarity between those cases is incredible and troubling. As far as Israel is concerned, we reiterate that all options are on the table, and recommend to our friends to do the same."
'IDF abuse affair serious' As for the abuse affair in the Israel Defense Forces, Barak told Ynet after the meeting that he viewed the incident as extremely severe, but added that he believed it should be dealt with inside the army and not at the Knesset. He added that these phenomena have been going on for years, as well as the attempts to eradicate them.
Asked to address the affair, the defense minister said that "the entire IDF is working to uproot and reduce such phenomena, at the chief of staff's order. All I am saying is that these are not things which have been generated in the past four years or 14 years. "The incident itself is extremely severe. I know that the chief of staff and commanders are dealing with it as required," he added. Barak clarified, however, that he does not support the appointment of a parliamentary commission of inquiry to probe the incident.

Hezbollah has stockpiled up to 40,000 rockets and is training its members to use missiles capable of hitting Tel Aviv as well as Israeli aircraft, IDF Northern Command Deputy Chief Alon Friedman told The Times.
Hezbollah stockpiles 40,000 rockets near Israel border

The Times/August 5, 2009
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6739175.ece
Richard Beeston on the Israel-Lebanese border and Nicholas Blanford in Beirut
Three years after Israel fought a bloody war in Lebanon against Hezbollah, there are fears that hostilities could erupt again — this time with the militant group better armed than ever.
According to Israeli, United Nations and Hezbollah officials, the Shia Muslim militia is stronger than it was in 2006 when it took on the Israeli army in a war that killed 1,191 Lebanese and 43 Israeli civilians. Hezbollah has up to 40,000 rockets and is training its forces to use ground-to-ground missiles capable of hitting Tel Aviv, and anti-aircraft missiles that could challenge Israel’s dominance of the skies over Lebanon. Brigadier-General Alon Friedman, the deputy head of the Israeli Northern Command, told The Times from his headquarters overlooking the Israeli-Lebanese border that the peace of the past three years could “explode at any minute”. His concerns were due partly to threats from Hezbollah’s leadership. Last month Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, warned that if the southern suburbs of Beirut were bombed as they were in the last war, he would strike back against Tel Aviv, the largest Israeli city. “We have changed the equation that had existed previously,” he said. “Now the southern suburbs versus Tel Aviv, and not Beirut versus Tel Aviv.”
Hezbollah’s rearming is in the name of resistance against Israel. The real reason, however, probably has more to do with its ally Iran. If Israel carries out its threat to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, the main retaliation is likely to come from Hezbollah in Lebanon. All sides agreed that the threat was not a bluff. Last month the scale of the Hezbollah build-up was revealed after an explosion at an ammunition bunker in the village of Khirbet Slim, 12 miles from the Israeli border.
Surveillance footage obtained by The Times showed Hezbollah fighters trying to salvage rockets and munitions from the site. Obstructions were placed in the way of Unifil peacekeepers going to investigate. Alain Le Roy, the head of UN peacekeeping operations, told the Security Council last month that the explosion amounted to a serious violation of UN Resolution 1701, which imposed a ceasefire and arms ban after the war. “A number of indications suggest that the depot belonged to Hezbollah and, in contrast to previous discoveries by Unifil and the Lebanese Armed Forces of weapons and ammunition, that it was not abandoned but, rather, actively maintained,” he said. Unifil’s mandate is due to be renewed by the Security Council this month and Israel is pressing for the peacekeepers to be more robust in stopping Hezbollah and other armed groups from infiltrating the UN-patrolled region south of the Litani river. Hezbollah, which is armed, trained and financed by Iran, has been engaged in a recruitment, training and rearmament drive since the end of the 2006 war. Although basic training on firing weapons is taught at camps in the mountains flanking the Bekaa Valley, specialised courses are carried out in Iran. Hundreds of fighters have travelled to Iran since 2006 to learn about bomb-making, anti-tank missiles, sniping and firing rockets. “War will definitely come,” said Hussam, a 33-year-old fighter who joined Hezbollah in 1987 as a scout. “Israel will never leave us alone.” Military sources close to Hezbollah said that the group wanted to increase the number and effectiveness of its air defence systems. Hezbollah is believed to have acquired large numbers of SA18 shoulder-fired missiles that could mount a challenge to Israeli helicopters and low-flying jets. Western intelligence sources told The Times that Hezbollah fighters were receiving training in Syria on the SA8 system. The radar-guided SA8 missiles are launched from tracked vehicles and have a maximum altitude of 36,000ft (11,000m), which would pose a serious threat. Israeli jets and drones use Lebanese airspace almost daily. Israel said that the flights were necessary for reconnaissance purposes, although the UN considered them violations of Resolution 1701. Israel said that Hezbollah’s acquisition of advanced anti-aircraft missiles could prompt a military response to destroy the systems. Israeli warnings relayed to Syria appear to have forestalled the entry of the SA8 system into Lebanon, the sources said. Israel claims that Hezbollah has tripled the number of surface-to-surface rockets since 2006, to about 40,000. “Hezbollah has not only replaced the munitions but upgraded their missiles,” Danny Ayalon, the Deputy Israeli Foreign Minister, said. “They are bragging now that they can hit Tel Aviv.” According to Western intelligence sources, Hezbollah hopes to receive an improved version of the Iranian-manufactured Fateh-110 rocket, which can carry a 1,100lb (500kg) warhead more than 125 miles (200km).
Hezbollah officials refused to provide details on its military build-up but they did not deny that they were prepared for another war. “Hezbollah today is in a better condition than it was in July 2006,” said Sheikh Naim Qassem, Hezbollah’s deputy leader, in an interview with The Times. “And if the Israelis think they will cause more damage against us, they know that we also can inflict more damage on them.”

U-turn puts Hezbollah in the driving seat
By Sami Moubayed /Asia Times
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KH06Ak01.html
DAMASCUS - Those who rejoiced at the election results in Lebanon on June 7 had a big surprise this week, as the tables seemed to turn on the pro-Western coalition in favor of the Hezbollah-led opposition, and Damascus.
During the elections, the March 14 Coalition, which is close to the United States and France, won 71 seats in parliament, while the opposition, backed by Syria and Iran, came out with 57, maintaining the minority they had held since 2005. On August 2, however, Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, head of the Progressive Socialist Party in Lebanon and one of the March 14 heavyweights, sent shockwaves throughout Beirut by announcing that his alliance with March 14 had been "driven by necessity and must end".
Speaking at the opening of a party assembly at the Beaurivage
Hotel in Beirut, Jumblatt called for a new Lebanese alliance, "free of bias", claiming that March 14's program, which he had strongly praised and been a part of for years, had been driven on "sectarian and tribal levels". The Future Movement, headed by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri, was shocked at his u-turn and issued a statement defending itself, though without mentioning Jumblatt by name. The Future Movement said it remained committed to the Cedar Revolution, launched with US backing in response to the assassination of Lebanon's former prime minister Rafik Hariri, Saad's father, in 2005.
Another surprise in Jumblatt's speech was his praise for Syria, and his description of past visits to Washington and meeting with former president George W Bush - while the US was trying to change the regime in Damascus - as a "black spot" in his history. Jumblatt seems to have realized - eight months into the Barack Obama White House - that the policies of the Bush era are now obsolete in the Middle East. He appears to have concluded that rather than hold onto them and become an outsider, it is safer to change course - no matter how dramatically - to remain influential in Lebanon.
Members of the opposition March 8 alliance have been consistently demanding a "blocking third" veto power, to obstruct any legislation in Hariri's cabinet related to Hezbollah relinquishing its arms or the United Nations international tribunal investigating his Rafik Hariri's assassination.
Saad has struggled to form a government since the election, with the opposition refusing to join the cabinet unless this blocking third power was granted and reminding Hariri that they walked out of then Fouad Siniora's cabinet in 2006 for the same reason when he was premier - Siniora is currently serving as caretaker prime minister.
Last week, a solution had seemingly been reached. It was announced that the opposition would be allowed to name one of the five ministers appointed to the government by independent President Michel Suleiman. By consensus, it was agreed that Suleiman would be able to name the minister of Defense, Interior and three ministers of state - a Shi'ite, a Sunni and a Christian.
Accordingly, the opposition would get a say in naming the Shi'ite minister, which would give them control of 11 - rather than 10 ministers. This would effectively give them the blocking third in Hariri's 30-man cabinet.
Speaker Nabih Berri, a ranking member of the opposition, came out on Monday saying that the three Druze ministers in the upcoming Hariri cabinet could no longer be considered members of March 14. He added that Jumblatt's words would certainly have negative effects on March 14. Jumblatt's u-turn means that March 14 now has to subtract nine parliamentarians from its bloc, bringing them down to 62.
If Jumblatt decides to defect fully to the opposition, this would give Hariri's opponents a total of 66 seats - effectively turning the tables on March 14 and granting March 8 a parliamentary majority. Jumblatt's stance effectively makes all talk about a blocking third for the opposition meaningless, and sheds serious doubt on whether Hariri will survive as prime minister.
Additionally, it was reported that Jumblatt might visit Syria soon, under the wing of Palestinian statesman Azmi Beshara. Adding fuel to the fire, Jumblatt has told a Tunisian magazine, Realites, that, "I intend to fix my relationship with Damascus my own way. Looking back, I think I committed the sin of voicing too many anti-Syrian slogans." He added that Beirut "will not be proud of a confrontation with Syria".
Jumblatt has also changed his views on who killed Rafik Hariri in 2005. He had previously accused Syria, but he told the magazine that he was no longer certain who had carried out the assassination. There has been no response from the Syrian side on Jumblatt's possible defection, only articles in independent Syrian websites saying that Jumblatt - who is married to a Damascene woman from the Sharabati family - will arrive soon in Damascus. And a leak in the Beirut daily al-Akhbar, saying that Damascus is renovating Jumblatt's residence in the Syrian capital, which has been vacant since 2004.
Why did Jumblatt - known to be a political chameleon - change his colors so dramatically? The Druze warlord was a strong ally of Syria during Lebanon's civil war, and was royally rewarded for his services with government posts for him and his entourage throughout the 1990s. But when he realized that Syria's fortunes were turning in 2004 - shortly after the war on Iraq - he shifted towards the opposition, calling on the Syrians to leave Lebanon, though more than anyone else it was him that helped legitimize the Syrian presence in Lebanon, for nearly 20 years.
Jumblatt managed to read the political landscape in Washington well , realizing that the Bush White House was at daggers end with the Syrian government, because of its lack of cooperation in the war on Iraq. When Rafik Hariri was killed in February 2005, Jumblatt unleashed his anger not only at Syria but at its allies in Lebanon (notably then-president Emille Lahhoud), calling on it to leave and implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559, which, among other things, calls for the "disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias".
Right after the war with Israel in 2006, Jumblatt aggressively spoke out against Damascus, and he was the first member of the March 14 coalition to call for the disarmament of Hezbollah. He also bluntly accused both Syria and Hezbollah of involvement in the assassination of Rafik Hariri and other Lebanese figures, such as journalists Samir al-Kassir and Jibran Tweini.
Jumblatt went to Washington during the heyday of the George W Bush era and got red-carpet treatment at the White House, famously embracing then-secretary of state Condoleezza Rice in the midst of the 2006 Israeli war with Lebanon. He most recently met Rice in November 2008, and has never missed a chance to cozy up with the Americans - despite the fact that earlier in his career he was a self-proclaimed opponent of the US and admirer of Gamal Abdul Nasser, the godfather of modern Arab nationalism.
Jumblatt began to change his tune in May 2008, when members of Hezbollah clashed militarily with armed men from Saad Hariri's Future Movement. The Future's boys were no match for the well-trained fighters of Hezbollah and were rounded up in a matter of hours, and disarmed. This set alarm bells ringing at Jumblatt's palace on Mount Lebanon.
The entire ordeal was in response to a government attempt at dismantling Hezbollah's security and telecommunications network at Beirut International Airport. Jumblatt realized that his team was no match for that of Syria and Iran, regardless of how much support they had from the US, Saudi Arabia and France.
He has since then slowly been changing his rhetoric on Hezbollah and Syria, and this summer he surprised observers by meeting with Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah. Now, he has made yet another surprising move by abandoning Saad Hariri and the March 14 coalition, raising the question: Why now?
Jumblatt is a political animal who follows the prevailing wind, whether it comes from Moscow, Washington or Damascus. When Syria and the US were allies in the 1990s, he reasoned that it was best to be on Syria's side, due to its excellent relations with the Bill Clinton administration. When he saw that relations were irreparable between the Syrians and George W Bush, he decided to abandon ship - especially after the passing of resolution 1559, seeing that a head-on collusion between Damascus and Washington loomed on the horizon.
That happened when Hariri was killed in 2005, and Jumblatt tried to ally himself with Washington's "regime change" movement, but by late 2008 it was clear that Bush was leaving, having repeatedly failed at toppling - or even weakening - the Syrians. Now with Obama in power, there is no sense in maintaining hostility with the Syrians, since Obama is interested neither in regime change, not even instability in Damascus.
Obama's focus is on Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan - not the worries of Lebanon, and Jumblatt has realized this from day one. The Americans are willing to tolerate a reborn Syrian influence in Lebanon, if it guarantees peace and quiet in Beirut and Iraq. Obama saw the Saudis mending their broken fences with the Syrians - on the last day of Bush's term in office - and has overseen confidence-building gestures between Damascus and Washington.
One was how the Syrians helped bring about peaceful provincial elections in Iraq - with Saudi help - much to Obama's pleasure. He then saw how Obama began to turn a blind eye to sanctions on Syria, and how in July he lifted some sanctions on Damascus related to information technology and aviation.
Earlier, the US had decided to send an ambassador to Damascus, a post that has been vacant for four years, and Obama has been sending officials from the State Department to meet with President Bashar al-Assad. The US needed Syria to deal with Hezbollah, Hamas and Iraq, and it was likely that unless Jumblatt mended his ties with the Syrians, a new deal was going to emerge in the Middle East, and he was going to be left in the cold.
The question remains: will the Syrians forgive Jumblatt, who went to unbelievable levels of criticism against Syria, using dramatic insults that remain strongly imprinted in the minds of Syrians, both the government and public alike? In the complex world of Middle East politics everything is possible. Jumblatt's u-turn is testimony to how low regional politics have sunk and how one's word - which meant his pride and honor during the age of Arab chivalry - can now swiftly be broken.
*Sami Moubayed is editor-in-chief of Forward Magazine in Syria.
(Copyright 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Now Lebanon: Lebanese press round-up: August 5, 2009

Note: There is no press round-up on Sundays.
August 5, 2009
Press round-up for Wednesday, August 5th from the morning edition of Lebanon’s An-Nahar, Al-Akhbar, As-Safir, and Ad-Diyar newspapers.
Opening Titles
Berri is confident regarding the formation [of the government]; Siniora says “the Cedar Revolution is a moment summarizing all our history.”
[Saudi] royal envoy Khoja meets with Jumblatt to inquire [about his position].
Hariri evaluates the “major transformation” in France.
Barak holds the Lebanese government responsible for “any escalation along the border.”
Local News
Saudi Information and Culture Minister Abdel Aziz Khoja arrived in Beirut in his capacity as King Abdullah bin Abdel Aziz’s envoy in order to ask MP Walid Jumblatt for clarifications regarding his latest positions. Khoja also called outgoing PM Fouad Siniora.
According to official reports yesterday, PM-designate Saad Hariri headed on Monday evening to “the south of France on family vacation.”
According to sources, Hariri “is currently reflecting on the major transformation in MP Jumblatt’s positions and is examining the [current] political situation in order to come up with the appropriate reaction.”
Outgoing PM Siniora returned to the forefront, stressing the March 14 constants and heading the meeting of the Future Movement’s parliamentary bloc. Siniora said that Hariri’s trip “is aimed at allowing him to keep his distance from the current controversy.”
Jumblatt told An-Nahar, “I decided not to give any statements while waiting for the storm and the misinterpretations of my positions during the PSP General Assembly to abate.”
According to opposition sources, no one can say that Syria is behind Jumblatt’s strategy. These sources expressed their surprise at the absence of any Saudi, Jordanian, Egyptian or US reaction criticizing the Druze leader’s position.
In response to An-Nahar’s inquiries about PM-designate Saad Hariri’s visit to France and its impact on the formation of the government, Speaker Berri said, “No matter how things evolve and how many days elapse, the government will be formed eventually according to the formula that has been agreed upon.”
Commenting on the positions expressed by MP Walid Jumblatt’s circles, whereby his parliamentary bloc is still part of the majority, March 14 sources told An-Nahar, “This is not nearly enough to clarify Jumblatt’s televised declarations.”
During the meeting of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Security Committee yesterday, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak held the Lebanese government responsible for any escalation along the border between the two countries.
Opening Titles
Khoja visits Beirut; Hariri is on vacation.
Sleiman is optimistic; the Future Movement dresses its wound.
Abbas admits making “mistakes”: Fatah’s steadfastness is a miracle.
Local News
According to a source [informed of] the government-formation process, President Michel Sleiman is still optimistic about the formation of the government “within ten days, but is naturally not making light of the political surprise resulting from MP Jumblatt’s re-positioning.”
Citing information from the Baabda presidential palace, the source deemed it unlikely for PM-designate Saad Hariri to declare his inability to form the government. The same source denied that the name of former PM Najib Mikati has been evoked to take up this position.
Several officials learned yesterday that Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdel Aziz may not visit the United States following Morocco. Abdullah is now more likely to head from Morocco to Damascus.
According to a Future Movement activist, the Future Movement is most annoyed at the timing, shape, content and potential consequences of Jumblatt’s behavior.
A source close to decision-making circles in the Future Movement said that what he described as “Jumblatt’s immorality” will delay the resumption of talks concerning the formation of the government pending “the end of Jumblatt’s party…” and the results of his re-positioning.
A Future Movement MP told Al-Akhbar that “Jumblatt’s behavior calls for looking into the government formula that has been agreed upon.” The MP refused to confirm that what he meant is the 15-10-5 formula, rather asking: “Isn’t it the 16-10-4 formula?”
The same MP admitted that Jumblatt’s position has cost the March 14 coalition its parliamentary majority. At the same time, he asserted that the March 14 forces are still the largest parliamentary gathering, “whereas the minority will soon lose Speaker Berri’s and MP Franjieh’s blocs, as both will join MP Walid Jumblatt.”
The Fatah Movement started yesterday its sixth congress, which is being held for the first time in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in Bethlehem, albeit in the absence of approximately 400 Fatah members from the Gaza Strip.
Opening Titles
Khoja meets with Jumblatt and calls Berri; Sleiman awaits Hariri’s return within 48 hours.
The formation of the government is on a “leave to think” … while waiting for a “new surprise.”
Local News
Sources asserted to As-Safir that PM-designate Saad Hariri is due back in Beirut within 48 hours and that he has informed the president and the parliament speaker of it. Hariri will then immediately resume the government formation process.
According to a key political figure, Saudi Information Minister Abdel Aziz Khoja’s visit is “part of a direct and serious Saudi initiative aimed at resolving the current situation.” This source revealed that Khoja also called Speaker Berri yesterday evening.
MP Walid Jumblatt told As-Safir last night that he came to know of the Saudi minister’s arrival in Beirut through the media, adding that “no meeting was held between us.”
“Unofficial PSP sources” told As-Safir and other media outlets yesterday that Khoja met with Jumblatt, but they failed to shed light on what was discussed during that meeting, merely saying that “the atmosphere [of the meeting] was excellent.”
Khoja reportedly established political contacts with the Hezbollah leadership, expressing the wish that it would facilitate the mission of the prime minister-designate. However, Hezbollah leadership sources denied that any such contacts had taken place!
In a direct response to Jumblatt, the Future bloc emphasized its “attachment to the ‘Lebanon First’ slogan, which does not contravene Lebanon’s permanent and undisputable Arab affiliation.”
Opening Titles
Khoja visits [Jumblatt] to bridge the gap; Sleiman is annoyed by the complications [hindering the formation of the government].
The attempts to establish direct communication between Hariri and Jumblatt failed.
The Future Movement insists on [using the expression of] “shameful history”; The PSP: We shall not recant our positions.
Local News
LF Executive Committee Samir Geagea and his wife reportedly left the country on a private visit.
Future Movement sources told Ad-Diyar that the movement’s communiqué is clear and does not require any interpretation, particularly regarding the reference to [Jumblatt’s] “shameful history.”
Trustworthy sources informed Ad-Diyar that MP Walid Jumblatt and Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Reza Shibani held a meeting that lasted for more than two hours at the Iranian Embassy in Beirut.
According to sources, the contacts established by Democratic Gathering MPs, especially Marwan Hamadeh, Ghazi Aridi and Wael Abu Faour, with PM-designate Saad Hariri’s advisers in order to secure a direct communication line between Hariri and Jumblatt all failed.
According to sources, Hariri asked Jumblatt to clarify his positions during their latest meeting. The Druze leader reportedly said that his position hinges on the formation of the government and reassured Hariri that he is committed to the decisions of the March 14 coalition.
These sources went on to assert that “Hariri was surprised by Jumblatt’s declarations at the Beaurivage Hotel and seemed quite annoyed by them.”

September… this year

Elie Fawaz , August 5, 2009
Now Lebanon/Wahid Gordji was officially just a translator working for the Iranian Embassy in Paris in the mid-1980s. In truth, however, he was the No. 2 man at the embassy in charge of the negotiations held with French diplomats over the issue of French hostages in Lebanon. His name was also associated in the French media with the string of terrorist attacks that plagued the country in 1986. The problem originated in France’s freezing the Iranian assets of Eurodif, a company specializing in the production of enriched uranium, in the wake of the Khomeinist revolution. The Shah of Iran had bought a 10% share in this company’s assets in 1975 and lent it $180 million during the same year in return for a right to buy off a certain fraction of its production. The problem was also rooted in France’s support to Iraq in its war against Iran.
In short, Lebanon was a stage for the settlement of international scores using Lebanese intermediaries. These events resulted in many victims, such as Michel Seurat, not to mention several others who were kidnapped, such as Roger Auque, Jean-Louis Normandin, Michel Carton, Georges Hansen and Jean-Paul Kauffmann.
The wave of terrorism targeting France ended after the payment of $1.6 billion to Iran, which retained its share in Eurodif. Wahid Gordji returned to his homeland safe and sound, having appeared before the French judiciary.
Today, Iran is locked in a conflict with the world over far more than some company assets; rather, it is about a dangerous nuclear program Iran is planning on defending with all available resources, whether domestically should it come under attack, or on the foreign level through its allies in Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine… Indeed, these fronts are reportedly fitted with an Iranian fuse ready to blow come September if the international community loses its patience with Iran and enacts sanctions that may prove dangerous for the regime in Tehran.
Is this not in keeping with Hezbollah’s renewed threat and sudden reactivation of the “southern front” by acting on the field under the guise of the South’s “inhabitants” and permanently reminding everyone that it has more than 40,000 rockets ready to be fired and capable of hitting any location in the Israeli heartland? This rhetorical and field escalation adopted by Hezbollah actually comes at a time when the South is enjoying a period of stability under Resolution 1701, which has not undergone any changes ever since it was first implemented.
Lebanon is, once again, filling in as a stage for settling regional scores and is today of a vital importance for all these forces, with one notable difference compared to the 1980s: The victims will not be French nationals this time around.
Will the yellow September be clad in black this year?
This article is a translation from the original, published on the NOW Arabic site on July 30







 

LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 06/09

Bible Reading of the day
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 15:21-28. Then Jesus went from that place and withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a Canaanite woman of that district came and called out, "Have pity on me, Lord, Son of David! My daughter is tormented by a demon." But he did not say a word in answer to her. His disciples came and asked him, "Send her away, for she keeps calling out after us." He said in reply, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." But the woman came and did him homage, saying, "Lord, help me." He said in reply, "It is not right to take the food of the children and throw it to the dogs." She said, "Please, Lord, for even the dogs eat the scraps that fall from the table of their masters." Then Jesus said to her in reply, "O woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish." And her daughter was healed from that hour.

Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special Reports
Release: ICC Calls on Pakistan's President Zardari to Defend Christians after Muslim Mob Ravages Two Towns in Pakistan 05/08/09
September this year. By: Elie Fawaz/Now Lebanon/August 5, 2009
With or without a war, Lebanon will still be picking up the pieces. The -Daily Star 05/08/09
We’re discovering the worst of Bush in Barack Obama.By Naomi Wolf 05/08/09

Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for August 05/09
Aoun: Jumblat Did Not Join Opposition but Is 'More than Welcome'-Naharnet
Jumblat From Baabda: Earlier Statements Were Misunderstood, I Won't Abandon Hariri and March 14 Principles-Naharnet
March 14 Warns against March 8 'Maneuvers' to Delay Government Formation-Naharnet
Wahhab: Damascus Road Open for Jumblat-Naharnet
British Foreign Office Minister Arrives in Lebanon
-Naharnet
Maronite Bishops: Delay in Government Shape-Up Unfortunate
-Naharnet
Lavrov: We Continue to Support Lebanon's Sovereignty and Stability
-Naharnet
Riyadh Tells Jumblat that his Stances Weaken Hariri and Saudi-Syrian Negotiations
-Naharnet
Israel FM Visits Divided Border Village-Naharnet
Hariri Rejects Personally Choosing Druze Ministers, Jumblat Might Travel to France
-Naharnet
Report: Hizbullah Tripled Number of Surface-to-Surface Rockets Since 2006
-Naharnet
Now Lebanon: Lebanese press round-up: August 5, 2009
Jumblatt: I did not and will not abandon PM-designate Hariri-NOW Lebanon 05/08/09
Security cabinet to mull Ghajar's future-Jerusalem Post
Barak: Beirut responsible for security of border-Daily Star
Israeli Defense establishment: Hand over northern Ghajar-Ynetnews
Israeli IDF: Northern calm in danger-Ynetnews
Hezbollah stockpiles 40000 rockets near Israel border-Times Online
Barak: PA will be examined after Fatah congress-Ynetnews
Reconnecting America and Syria-guardian.co.uk
Hezbollah cell to face court in Egypt-United Press International
Hezbollah reacts to Syrian sanctions-United Press International
IDF: Northern calm in danger-Ynetnews
Britain backs Syria-EU pact despite concerns-Washington Post
More Sydney terror plot charges-BBC News
Terrorism raids 'brought forward after leak'-ABC Online
HRW calls on Damascus to free top rights lawyer-Daily Star
Muslim Brotherhood linked to terrorists-By Inter Press Service
Australian police detain four for plotting suicide attack-Daily Star
UK minister presses Syria to promote Mideast peace-By Agence France Presse (AFP)
Hariri takes holiday as efforts to form cabinet stumble-Daily Star
Franjieh to visit Sfeir to shore up Christian reconciliation efforts-Daily Star
Geagea leaves Lebanon for summer vacation-Daily Star
UN’s Ban to ask for extension of UNIFIL mandate-Daily Star
Saudi Arabia may shut LBC offices over ‘sex’ talk show-By Agence France Presse (AFP)
Lebanese man arrested for spying for Israel-Daily Star  
Italy donates over $10 million to fund 12 new projects-Daily Star
Sidon holds urgent meeting to solve water crisis-Daily Star
A trail less-traveled: Hiking in Ehden-Daily Star


Security cabinet to mull Ghajar's future
By HERB KEINON/Jerusalem Post 
Aug 5, 2009
The security cabinet is likely to meet soon to discuss the fate of Ghajar, with Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman expected to give his recommendation on how Israel should deal with the northern town that straddles the Lebanese border. SLIDESHOW: Israel & Region | World In recent weeks, Lieberman - charged by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu with drawing up policy recommendations concerning the town - has signaled that he supports building a physical barrier on the international border that divides the city in half, and turning the northern part of the city over to UNIFIL control. Earlier this year, Israel indicated it was willing to negotiate with the UN over a pullback in Ghajar. A positive recommendation by Lieberman on this issue would be the first time an official at his level came out in favor of this idea. When the IDF pulled out of Lebanon in May 2000, the UN determined that the border ran through the middle of Ghajar. In the aftermath of the Second Lebanon War in 2006, Israel maintained a military presence in the northern part of the town and built a security fence around it.
Some 1,500 residents live in the northern part of the town, and another 500-700 are in the southern part, on the Israeli side of the border. An Israeli withdrawal would be in line with commitments it made as part of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which put an end to the 2006 fighting. UN, European and American officials have been urging Israel to move out of northern Ghajar to help bolster the moderates in Lebanon

ICC Calls on Pakistan's President Zardari to Defend Christians after Muslim Mob Ravages Two Towns in Pakistan
Washington, D.C. (August 4, 2009) - International Christian Concern (ICC) is calling on Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari to defend religious freedom by taking swift measures to prosecute the Muslim mobs that attacked Christian neighborhoods near Faisalabad, Pakistan, burning over 100 homes and killing at least eight Christians in two related attacks occurring on July 31 and August 1. The first riot began in Korian on Friday, July 31, a day after local Muslims accused a man of desecrating the Qur'an. Muslim clerics decried Talib's "blasphemy" and called for his death. A mob then gathered and looted and burned two churches and 75 of the 80 Christian houses in the village, setting up barricades to impede fire engines and burning alive domestic animals in the process.Unsatisfied with the wreckage of Korian, the clerics and several radical groups incited a second mob to gather in Gojra on Saturday morning. They advanced through the neighborhood shooting in the air, throwing chemical and petrol bombs on houses, and looting indiscriminately. The mob attacked the residence of the Bishop of the Church of Pakistan, and again set up barricades in the street to prevent firefighters from reaching the burning houses. Three churches were also destroyed.
Seven of those killed were from the same family, including two children. They lived in Gojra and were burnt alive as they tried to escape their house, which the Muslim mob - estimated to be at least three thousand strong - looted and then set alight. The last confirmed casualty was found in the ashes of his house, burnt nearly beyond recognition.
ICC sources indicate that 35 Christians were critically injured, and 45 women and children were missing after the attack.
Christians have experienced severe discrimination at the hands of the current provincial government before, which under Shahbaz Sharif refused to publish or act on an investigation into the burning of a Christian village in 1997. This has created an atmosphere of impunity, and if the highest authorities in Pakistan ignore the current incident it will lead to repeat attacks throughout the country. ICC urges all concerned parties to call the Embassy of Pakistan to express their opposition to this egregious violation of religious freedom and urge the President to take immediate action to prosecute the leaders of the mob, especially the radical clerics who called for the attacks.
Pakistan Embassies:
USA: (202) 243-6500
Canada: (613) 238-7881
UK: 0870-005-6967

Reconnecting America and Syria
Internet users could be among the first to benefit as the US prepares to dismantle trade sanctions
Sakhr al-Makhadhi guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 4 August 2009 19.30 BST Article historyAmerican officials are preparing to waive some of the sanctions against Syria imposed by the Bush administration, according to Imad Moustapha, the Syrian ambassador to Washington. First to go will be the ban on exports of spare parts and safety equipment for the Syrian civil aviation industry, followed by that on computer products. Crucially, this will mean Syrian internet users should be able to download software and buy goods and services online.
The only sticking point is that the rules will not be swept away with one signature in the Oval Office. Instead they will be handled on a case-by-case basis. But the US is hinting it will push through each individual waiver request without too much difficulty. There has been much talk of breaking the Syrian-Iranian alliance, but this move on sanctions is about more than international diplomacy and that old neocon favourite, winning hearts and minds. At present, Syrian internet users have to jump through hoops to do something as basic as downloading an update to a web browser. US companies do their best to enforce the sanctions law, by preventing their products reaching Syria. The change will make life easier for millions of people, although internet-freedom activist Jillian York says many have already found ways around the embargo:
Syrians have been circumventing the ban in numerous ways by sharing software for years, and the market is flooded with 'banned' tech products. Therefore, the ban was low-hanging fruit, so to speak – the easiest way to please a great number of people quickly. In easing the software ban, the US has chosen its target wisely. The first to benefit will be the young, tech-savvy middle classes. This is a vital constituency because they make up the majority of the Syrian blogosphere, which is becoming the country's most vocal segment of society.
The business community is excited too. Syria's economy has been slowly opening up over the past decade. But there is virtually no e-commerce, and part of the reason is because the infrastructure that companies need is off-limits. PayPal, Amazon and some web-hosting companies have been blocking all transactions from Syria. In some cases, even logging on to some websites from Syria can end up in your account being terminated. The painless act of lifting the technology ban could improve America's image on the internet, and help Syrian businesses end the country's economic isolation. The US will benefit as its firms gain access to an untapped market.
The other part of the deal – the agreement to end the aircraft sanctions – seems to be the result of pressure from one of America's biggest companies, Boeing. Syrianair has grounded most of its ageing fleet of American planes because it has not been allowed to buy essential parts. So where did it turn for replacement aircraft? Europe. Last year the airline is understood to have started negotiations to buy up to 50 planes from Boeing's biggest rival, Airbus. The deal still has not been finalised, but if it does go through, it will deprive the American economy of billions of dollars it desperately needs. These small changes to the embargo have the potential to benefit millions of Syrian internet users, help open up the economy and maybe even give America a massive cash windfall. But why not go all the way and revoke the entire sanctions law? Imad Moustapha claims that would require the assent of the US Congress, where President Barack Obama could run into difficulties. Instead, the plan seems to be to lift parts of the embargo one by one until the law becomes meaningless.

Minister Yossi Peled appointed responsible for former SLA members

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3755737,00.html
Published: 08.02.09, 13:42 / Israel News
The cabinet appointed Minister Yossi Peled as the responsible minister for care of former Southern Lebanese Army members in Israel.
Peled will head an inter-ministerial team that will address housing, employment, education, and citizenship needs of former SLA members living in Israel since 2000 when the IDF withdrew from Lebanon. Peled said, "The State of Israel has a moral obligation to the people of SLA, its allies, who fought alongside it shoulder to shoulder." (Roni Sofer)

Defense establishment: Hand over northern Ghajar
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3757314,00.html
Israel should hand over control over northern section of Lebanon border village to United Nations, defense establishment says; political sources estimate that move will be undertaken as part of US-led regional peace initiative
Roni Sofer Published: 08.05.09, 00:27 / Israel News
The defense establishment is recommending that Israel transfer control over the northern part of Ghajar – a village located on the Lebanon border – to the United Nations.
A report on the subject was handed over to Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who is expected to present his recommendations to the National Security Cabinet in the near future. Political officials estimate that handing over control of northern Ghajar will be part of the regional gestures aimed at advancing the US-led peace process.
The village of Ghajar is divided into two sections, but the IDF has maintained control over its northern part since the Second Lebanon War. In the wake of the war, military officials feared that the village, where some residents possess Israeli ID cards, will be used to facilitate Hezbollah terror activity.
Following President Barack Obama's election victory, the US has been eager to advance the issue. However, Israel refrained from taking a decision on the matter ahead of the recent Lebanese elections, as not to boost Hezbollah.
Although the area was taken from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War, both Damascus and Beirut currently claim that the Har Dov region on the northern border belongs to Lebanon.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is planning to discuss the issue in the coming weeks. The PM asked Foreign Minister Lieberman to prepare a report on the diplomatic implications of a hand over.
The issues currently examined by the Foreign Ministry include Israel's ability to monitor crossing points between the two parts of the village, UNIFIL's ability to prevent the entry of Hezbollah men into the area, and various legal issues involved in the matter.

Barak: PA will be examined after Fatah congress
Defense minister tells Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that alongside desire not to intervene in Palestinians' internal issues, they will be examined according to results of Fatah conference
Amnon Meranda Published: 08.04.09, 14:19 / Israel News
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3756984,00.html
The Israeli defense establishment is closely monitoring the Fatah congress, which is meeting in Bethlehem to decide on the Palestinian movement's future.
"We do not intervene in the Palestinians' internal issues," Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Tuesday. "We have allowed anyone who can arrive at the conference to do so, so that the decisions made there will have the broadest legitimization.
Nonetheless, the decisions will testify to the Palestinian side's readiness in terms of continuing the negotiations with Israel," the minister said, in light of reports that Fatah planned to add to update its platform a clause stating that it would not recognize Israel as the Jewish state.
Speaking at the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Barak noted that Israel would insist on keeping the settlement blocs as part of any solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as well a solution to the refugee issue outside the boundaries of the Jewish state.
"My suggestion is not to be too impressed by what will be said at the Fatah convention as part of the internal dialogue," he added. "We shouldn't ignore it and shouldn’t be too impressed. The real test will come after the convention – when a leadership is formed there and a proper amount of legitimacy, and then we will see what this leadership is willing to bring to the negotiation table."
According to the defense minister, it is important that a future agreement "reflects the end of the conflict and the lack of mutual demands between Israel and the Palestinians."
Barak clarified that the Israeli government's relations with the American administration continued to be close. "Important and tight relations are the foundation of Israel's foreign policy.
"We ascribe great importance to the relations with the United States on all aspects – in the political, security and economic fields. We are holding an intimate dialogue on a variety of issues, in a bid to set President Obama's plan for a comprehensive regional agreement in motion."
'Lebanon will be responsible for escalation'
Barak reiterated the Israeli stance that Syria was helping terror organizations, despite its willingness to resume peace talks with Israel.
"Syria is helping Hezbolla arm as well. It sponsors the terror headquarters in Damascus, he said, but added that "making progress with Syria could also lead to positive results in terms of progress with Lebanon in the future."
Addressing Hezbollah's rearming, the defense minister clarified that as far as Israel was concerned, there was only one element responsible for what is taking place on Lebanese territory.
"We shall not accept an attempt to distinguish between the responsibility of the Hezbollah organization and the Lebanese government. A future escalation will be Lebanon's responsibility, as it is not implementing (Security Council) Resolution 1701 and additional decisions on disarming Hezbollah. Israel will see itself at liberty to act, with all it entails," Barak said.
The Iranian nuclear issue was also discussed during the meeting, and Barak said that Israel would not dictate to the Americans how to act on the issue. "But we do recommend setting a tight timetable," he said, "with milestones and an organizing cooרrdinated sanctions, in case the dialogue fails to yield the desired results."
The minister expressed his pessimism over the chance that negotiations would prompt Iran to abandon its nuclear aspirations.
"Past experience has taught us that such things have not succeeded. In my previous roles I have seen the past experience with Pakistan and North Korea, and the similarity between those cases is incredible and troubling. As far as Israel is concerned, we reiterate that all options are on the table, and recommend to our friends to do the same."
'IDF abuse affair serious' As for the abuse affair in the Israel Defense Forces, Barak told Ynet after the meeting that he viewed the incident as extremely severe, but added that he believed it should be dealt with inside the army and not at the Knesset. He added that these phenomena have been going on for years, as well as the attempts to eradicate them.
Asked to address the affair, the defense minister said that "the entire IDF is working to uproot and reduce such phenomena, at the chief of staff's order. All I am saying is that these are not things which have been generated in the past four years or 14 years. "The incident itself is extremely severe. I know that the chief of staff and commanders are dealing with it as required," he added. Barak clarified, however, that he does not support the appointment of a parliamentary commission of inquiry to probe the incident.

Hezbollah has stockpiled up to 40,000 rockets and is training its members to use missiles capable of hitting Tel Aviv as well as Israeli aircraft, IDF Northern Command Deputy Chief Alon Friedman told The Times.
Hezbollah stockpiles 40,000 rockets near Israel border

The Times/August 5, 2009
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6739175.ece
Richard Beeston on the Israel-Lebanese border and Nicholas Blanford in Beirut
Three years after Israel fought a bloody war in Lebanon against Hezbollah, there are fears that hostilities could erupt again — this time with the militant group better armed than ever.
According to Israeli, United Nations and Hezbollah officials, the Shia Muslim militia is stronger than it was in 2006 when it took on the Israeli army in a war that killed 1,191 Lebanese and 43 Israeli civilians. Hezbollah has up to 40,000 rockets and is training its forces to use ground-to-ground missiles capable of hitting Tel Aviv, and anti-aircraft missiles that could challenge Israel’s dominance of the skies over Lebanon. Brigadier-General Alon Friedman, the deputy head of the Israeli Northern Command, told The Times from his headquarters overlooking the Israeli-Lebanese border that the peace of the past three years could “explode at any minute”. His concerns were due partly to threats from Hezbollah’s leadership. Last month Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, warned that if the southern suburbs of Beirut were bombed as they were in the last war, he would strike back against Tel Aviv, the largest Israeli city. “We have changed the equation that had existed previously,” he said. “Now the southern suburbs versus Tel Aviv, and not Beirut versus Tel Aviv.”
Hezbollah’s rearming is in the name of resistance against Israel. The real reason, however, probably has more to do with its ally Iran. If Israel carries out its threat to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, the main retaliation is likely to come from Hezbollah in Lebanon. All sides agreed that the threat was not a bluff. Last month the scale of the Hezbollah build-up was revealed after an explosion at an ammunition bunker in the village of Khirbet Slim, 12 miles from the Israeli border.
Surveillance footage obtained by The Times showed Hezbollah fighters trying to salvage rockets and munitions from the site. Obstructions were placed in the way of Unifil peacekeepers going to investigate. Alain Le Roy, the head of UN peacekeeping operations, told the Security Council last month that the explosion amounted to a serious violation of UN Resolution 1701, which imposed a ceasefire and arms ban after the war. “A number of indications suggest that the depot belonged to Hezbollah and, in contrast to previous discoveries by Unifil and the Lebanese Armed Forces of weapons and ammunition, that it was not abandoned but, rather, actively maintained,” he said. Unifil’s mandate is due to be renewed by the Security Council this month and Israel is pressing for the peacekeepers to be more robust in stopping Hezbollah and other armed groups from infiltrating the UN-patrolled region south of the Litani river. Hezbollah, which is armed, trained and financed by Iran, has been engaged in a recruitment, training and rearmament drive since the end of the 2006 war. Although basic training on firing weapons is taught at camps in the mountains flanking the Bekaa Valley, specialised courses are carried out in Iran. Hundreds of fighters have travelled to Iran since 2006 to learn about bomb-making, anti-tank missiles, sniping and firing rockets. “War will definitely come,” said Hussam, a 33-year-old fighter who joined Hezbollah in 1987 as a scout. “Israel will never leave us alone.” Military sources close to Hezbollah said that the group wanted to increase the number and effectiveness of its air defence systems. Hezbollah is believed to have acquired large numbers of SA18 shoulder-fired missiles that could mount a challenge to Israeli helicopters and low-flying jets. Western intelligence sources told The Times that Hezbollah fighters were receiving training in Syria on the SA8 system. The radar-guided SA8 missiles are launched from tracked vehicles and have a maximum altitude of 36,000ft (11,000m), which would pose a serious threat. Israeli jets and drones use Lebanese airspace almost daily. Israel said that the flights were necessary for reconnaissance purposes, although the UN considered them violations of Resolution 1701. Israel said that Hezbollah’s acquisition of advanced anti-aircraft missiles could prompt a military response to destroy the systems. Israeli warnings relayed to Syria appear to have forestalled the entry of the SA8 system into Lebanon, the sources said. Israel claims that Hezbollah has tripled the number of surface-to-surface rockets since 2006, to about 40,000. “Hezbollah has not only replaced the munitions but upgraded their missiles,” Danny Ayalon, the Deputy Israeli Foreign Minister, said. “They are bragging now that they can hit Tel Aviv.” According to Western intelligence sources, Hezbollah hopes to receive an improved version of the Iranian-manufactured Fateh-110 rocket, which can carry a 1,100lb (500kg) warhead more than 125 miles (200km).
Hezbollah officials refused to provide details on its military build-up but they did not deny that they were prepared for another war. “Hezbollah today is in a better condition than it was in July 2006,” said Sheikh Naim Qassem, Hezbollah’s deputy leader, in an interview with The Times. “And if the Israelis think they will cause more damage against us, they know that we also can inflict more damage on them.”

U-turn puts Hezbollah in the driving seat
By Sami Moubayed /Asia Times
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KH06Ak01.html
DAMASCUS - Those who rejoiced at the election results in Lebanon on June 7 had a big surprise this week, as the tables seemed to turn on the pro-Western coalition in favor of the Hezbollah-led opposition, and Damascus.
During the elections, the March 14 Coalition, which is close to the United States and France, won 71 seats in parliament, while the opposition, backed by Syria and Iran, came out with 57, maintaining the minority they had held since 2005. On August 2, however, Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, head of the Progressive Socialist Party in Lebanon and one of the March 14 heavyweights, sent shockwaves throughout Beirut by announcing that his alliance with March 14 had been "driven by necessity and must end".
Speaking at the opening of a party assembly at the Beaurivage
Hotel in Beirut, Jumblatt called for a new Lebanese alliance, "free of bias", claiming that March 14's program, which he had strongly praised and been a part of for years, had been driven on "sectarian and tribal levels". The Future Movement, headed by Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri, was shocked at his u-turn and issued a statement defending itself, though without mentioning Jumblatt by name. The Future Movement said it remained committed to the Cedar Revolution, launched with US backing in response to the assassination of Lebanon's former prime minister Rafik Hariri, Saad's father, in 2005.
Another surprise in Jumblatt's speech was his praise for Syria, and his description of past visits to Washington and meeting with former president George W Bush - while the US was trying to change the regime in Damascus - as a "black spot" in his history. Jumblatt seems to have realized - eight months into the Barack Obama White House - that the policies of the Bush era are now obsolete in the Middle East. He appears to have concluded that rather than hold onto them and become an outsider, it is safer to change course - no matter how dramatically - to remain influential in Lebanon.
Members of the opposition March 8 alliance have been consistently demanding a "blocking third" veto power, to obstruct any legislation in Hariri's cabinet related to Hezbollah relinquishing its arms or the United Nations international tribunal investigating his Rafik Hariri's assassination.
Saad has struggled to form a government since the election, with the opposition refusing to join the cabinet unless this blocking third power was granted and reminding Hariri that they walked out of then Fouad Siniora's cabinet in 2006 for the same reason when he was premier - Siniora is currently serving as caretaker prime minister.
Last week, a solution had seemingly been reached. It was announced that the opposition would be allowed to name one of the five ministers appointed to the government by independent President Michel Suleiman. By consensus, it was agreed that Suleiman would be able to name the minister of Defense, Interior and three ministers of state - a Shi'ite, a Sunni and a Christian.
Accordingly, the opposition would get a say in naming the Shi'ite minister, which would give them control of 11 - rather than 10 ministers. This would effectively give them the blocking third in Hariri's 30-man cabinet.
Speaker Nabih Berri, a ranking member of the opposition, came out on Monday saying that the three Druze ministers in the upcoming Hariri cabinet could no longer be considered members of March 14. He added that Jumblatt's words would certainly have negative effects on March 14. Jumblatt's u-turn means that March 14 now has to subtract nine parliamentarians from its bloc, bringing them down to 62.
If Jumblatt decides to defect fully to the opposition, this would give Hariri's opponents a total of 66 seats - effectively turning the tables on March 14 and granting March 8 a parliamentary majority. Jumblatt's stance effectively makes all talk about a blocking third for the opposition meaningless, and sheds serious doubt on whether Hariri will survive as prime minister.
Additionally, it was reported that Jumblatt might visit Syria soon, under the wing of Palestinian statesman Azmi Beshara. Adding fuel to the fire, Jumblatt has told a Tunisian magazine, Realites, that, "I intend to fix my relationship with Damascus my own way. Looking back, I think I committed the sin of voicing too many anti-Syrian slogans." He added that Beirut "will not be proud of a confrontation with Syria".
Jumblatt has also changed his views on who killed Rafik Hariri in 2005. He had previously accused Syria, but he told the magazine that he was no longer certain who had carried out the assassination. There has been no response from the Syrian side on Jumblatt's possible defection, only articles in independent Syrian websites saying that Jumblatt - who is married to a Damascene woman from the Sharabati family - will arrive soon in Damascus. And a leak in the Beirut daily al-Akhbar, saying that Damascus is renovating Jumblatt's residence in the Syrian capital, which has been vacant since 2004.
Why did Jumblatt - known to be a political chameleon - change his colors so dramatically? The Druze warlord was a strong ally of Syria during Lebanon's civil war, and was royally rewarded for his services with government posts for him and his entourage throughout the 1990s. But when he realized that Syria's fortunes were turning in 2004 - shortly after the war on Iraq - he shifted towards the opposition, calling on the Syrians to leave Lebanon, though more than anyone else it was him that helped legitimize the Syrian presence in Lebanon, for nearly 20 years.
Jumblatt managed to read the political landscape in Washington well , realizing that the Bush White House was at daggers end with the Syrian government, because of its lack of cooperation in the war on Iraq. When Rafik Hariri was killed in February 2005, Jumblatt unleashed his anger not only at Syria but at its allies in Lebanon (notably then-president Emille Lahhoud), calling on it to leave and implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559, which, among other things, calls for the "disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias".
Right after the war with Israel in 2006, Jumblatt aggressively spoke out against Damascus, and he was the first member of the March 14 coalition to call for the disarmament of Hezbollah. He also bluntly accused both Syria and Hezbollah of involvement in the assassination of Rafik Hariri and other Lebanese figures, such as journalists Samir al-Kassir and Jibran Tweini.
Jumblatt went to Washington during the heyday of the George W Bush era and got red-carpet treatment at the White House, famously embracing then-secretary of state Condoleezza Rice in the midst of the 2006 Israeli war with Lebanon. He most recently met Rice in November 2008, and has never missed a chance to cozy up with the Americans - despite the fact that earlier in his career he was a self-proclaimed opponent of the US and admirer of Gamal Abdul Nasser, the godfather of modern Arab nationalism.
Jumblatt began to change his tune in May 2008, when members of Hezbollah clashed militarily with armed men from Saad Hariri's Future Movement. The Future's boys were no match for the well-trained fighters of Hezbollah and were rounded up in a matter of hours, and disarmed. This set alarm bells ringing at Jumblatt's palace on Mount Lebanon.
The entire ordeal was in response to a government attempt at dismantling Hezbollah's security and telecommunications network at Beirut International Airport. Jumblatt realized that his team was no match for that of Syria and Iran, regardless of how much support they had from the US, Saudi Arabia and France.
He has since then slowly been changing his rhetoric on Hezbollah and Syria, and this summer he surprised observers by meeting with Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah. Now, he has made yet another surprising move by abandoning Saad Hariri and the March 14 coalition, raising the question: Why now?
Jumblatt is a political animal who follows the prevailing wind, whether it comes from Moscow, Washington or Damascus. When Syria and the US were allies in the 1990s, he reasoned that it was best to be on Syria's side, due to its excellent relations with the Bill Clinton administration. When he saw that relations were irreparable between the Syrians and George W Bush, he decided to abandon ship - especially after the passing of resolution 1559, seeing that a head-on collusion between Damascus and Washington loomed on the horizon.
That happened when Hariri was killed in 2005, and Jumblatt tried to ally himself with Washington's "regime change" movement, but by late 2008 it was clear that Bush was leaving, having repeatedly failed at toppling - or even weakening - the Syrians. Now with Obama in power, there is no sense in maintaining hostility with the Syrians, since Obama is interested neither in regime change, not even instability in Damascus.
Obama's focus is on Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan - not the worries of Lebanon, and Jumblatt has realized this from day one. The Americans are willing to tolerate a reborn Syrian influence in Lebanon, if it guarantees peace and quiet in Beirut and Iraq. Obama saw the Saudis mending their broken fences with the Syrians - on the last day of Bush's term in office - and has overseen confidence-building gestures between Damascus and Washington.
One was how the Syrians helped bring about peaceful provincial elections in Iraq - with Saudi help - much to Obama's pleasure. He then saw how Obama began to turn a blind eye to sanctions on Syria, and how in July he lifted some sanctions on Damascus related to information technology and aviation.
Earlier, the US had decided to send an ambassador to Damascus, a post that has been vacant for four years, and Obama has been sending officials from the State Department to meet with President Bashar al-Assad. The US needed Syria to deal with Hezbollah, Hamas and Iraq, and it was likely that unless Jumblatt mended his ties with the Syrians, a new deal was going to emerge in the Middle East, and he was going to be left in the cold.
The question remains: will the Syrians forgive Jumblatt, who went to unbelievable levels of criticism against Syria, using dramatic insults that remain strongly imprinted in the minds of Syrians, both the government and public alike? In the complex world of Middle East politics everything is possible. Jumblatt's u-turn is testimony to how low regional politics have sunk and how one's word - which meant his pride and honor during the age of Arab chivalry - can now swiftly be broken.
*Sami Moubayed is editor-in-chief of Forward Magazine in Syria.
(Copyright 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Now Lebanon: Lebanese press round-up: August 5, 2009

Note: There is no press round-up on Sundays.
August 5, 2009
Press round-up for Wednesday, August 5th from the morning edition of Lebanon’s An-Nahar, Al-Akhbar, As-Safir, and Ad-Diyar newspapers.
Opening Titles
Berri is confident regarding the formation [of the government]; Siniora says “the Cedar Revolution is a moment summarizing all our history.”
[Saudi] royal envoy Khoja meets with Jumblatt to inquire [about his position].
Hariri evaluates the “major transformation” in France.
Barak holds the Lebanese government responsible for “any escalation along the border.”
Local News
Saudi Information and Culture Minister Abdel Aziz Khoja arrived in Beirut in his capacity as King Abdullah bin Abdel Aziz’s envoy in order to ask MP Walid Jumblatt for clarifications regarding his latest positions. Khoja also called outgoing PM Fouad Siniora.
According to official reports yesterday, PM-designate Saad Hariri headed on Monday evening to “the south of France on family vacation.”
According to sources, Hariri “is currently reflecting on the major transformation in MP Jumblatt’s positions and is examining the [current] political situation in order to come up with the appropriate reaction.”
Outgoing PM Siniora returned to the forefront, stressing the March 14 constants and heading the meeting of the Future Movement’s parliamentary bloc. Siniora said that Hariri’s trip “is aimed at allowing him to keep his distance from the current controversy.”
Jumblatt told An-Nahar, “I decided not to give any statements while waiting for the storm and the misinterpretations of my positions during the PSP General Assembly to abate.”
According to opposition sources, no one can say that Syria is behind Jumblatt’s strategy. These sources expressed their surprise at the absence of any Saudi, Jordanian, Egyptian or US reaction criticizing the Druze leader’s position.
In response to An-Nahar’s inquiries about PM-designate Saad Hariri’s visit to France and its impact on the formation of the government, Speaker Berri said, “No matter how things evolve and how many days elapse, the government will be formed eventually according to the formula that has been agreed upon.”
Commenting on the positions expressed by MP Walid Jumblatt’s circles, whereby his parliamentary bloc is still part of the majority, March 14 sources told An-Nahar, “This is not nearly enough to clarify Jumblatt’s televised declarations.”
During the meeting of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Security Committee yesterday, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak held the Lebanese government responsible for any escalation along the border between the two countries.
Opening Titles
Khoja visits Beirut; Hariri is on vacation.
Sleiman is optimistic; the Future Movement dresses its wound.
Abbas admits making “mistakes”: Fatah’s steadfastness is a miracle.
Local News
According to a source [informed of] the government-formation process, President Michel Sleiman is still optimistic about the formation of the government “within ten days, but is naturally not making light of the political surprise resulting from MP Jumblatt’s re-positioning.”
Citing information from the Baabda presidential palace, the source deemed it unlikely for PM-designate Saad Hariri to declare his inability to form the government. The same source denied that the name of former PM Najib Mikati has been evoked to take up this position.
Several officials learned yesterday that Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdel Aziz may not visit the United States following Morocco. Abdullah is now more likely to head from Morocco to Damascus.
According to a Future Movement activist, the Future Movement is most annoyed at the timing, shape, content and potential consequences of Jumblatt’s behavior.
A source close to decision-making circles in the Future Movement said that what he described as “Jumblatt’s immorality” will delay the resumption of talks concerning the formation of the government pending “the end of Jumblatt’s party…” and the results of his re-positioning.
A Future Movement MP told Al-Akhbar that “Jumblatt’s behavior calls for looking into the government formula that has been agreed upon.” The MP refused to confirm that what he meant is the 15-10-5 formula, rather asking: “Isn’t it the 16-10-4 formula?”
The same MP admitted that Jumblatt’s position has cost the March 14 coalition its parliamentary majority. At the same time, he asserted that the March 14 forces are still the largest parliamentary gathering, “whereas the minority will soon lose Speaker Berri’s and MP Franjieh’s blocs, as both will join MP Walid Jumblatt.”
The Fatah Movement started yesterday its sixth congress, which is being held for the first time in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in Bethlehem, albeit in the absence of approximately 400 Fatah members from the Gaza Strip.
Opening Titles
Khoja meets with Jumblatt and calls Berri; Sleiman awaits Hariri’s return within 48 hours.
The formation of the government is on a “leave to think” … while waiting for a “new surprise.”
Local News
Sources asserted to As-Safir that PM-designate Saad Hariri is due back in Beirut within 48 hours and that he has informed the president and the parliament speaker of it. Hariri will then immediately resume the government formation process.
According to a key political figure, Saudi Information Minister Abdel Aziz Khoja’s visit is “part of a direct and serious Saudi initiative aimed at resolving the current situation.” This source revealed that Khoja also called Speaker Berri yesterday evening.
MP Walid Jumblatt told As-Safir last night that he came to know of the Saudi minister’s arrival in Beirut through the media, adding that “no meeting was held between us.”
“Unofficial PSP sources” told As-Safir and other media outlets yesterday that Khoja met with Jumblatt, but they failed to shed light on what was discussed during that meeting, merely saying that “the atmosphere [of the meeting] was excellent.”
Khoja reportedly established political contacts with the Hezbollah leadership, expressing the wish that it would facilitate the mission of the prime minister-designate. However, Hezbollah leadership sources denied that any such contacts had taken place!
In a direct response to Jumblatt, the Future bloc emphasized its “attachment to the ‘Lebanon First’ slogan, which does not contravene Lebanon’s permanent and undisputable Arab affiliation.”
Opening Titles
Khoja visits [Jumblatt] to bridge the gap; Sleiman is annoyed by the complications [hindering the formation of the government].
The attempts to establish direct communication between Hariri and Jumblatt failed.
The Future Movement insists on [using the expression of] “shameful history”; The PSP: We shall not recant our positions.
Local News
LF Executive Committee Samir Geagea and his wife reportedly left the country on a private visit.
Future Movement sources told Ad-Diyar that the movement’s communiqué is clear and does not require any interpretation, particularly regarding the reference to [Jumblatt’s] “shameful history.”
Trustworthy sources informed Ad-Diyar that MP Walid Jumblatt and Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Reza Shibani held a meeting that lasted for more than two hours at the Iranian Embassy in Beirut.
According to sources, the contacts established by Democratic Gathering MPs, especially Marwan Hamadeh, Ghazi Aridi and Wael Abu Faour, with PM-designate Saad Hariri’s advisers in order to secure a direct communication line between Hariri and Jumblatt all failed.
According to sources, Hariri asked Jumblatt to clarify his positions during their latest meeting. The Druze leader reportedly said that his position hinges on the formation of the government and reassured Hariri that he is committed to the decisions of the March 14 coalition.
These sources went on to assert that “Hariri was surprised by Jumblatt’s declarations at the Beaurivage Hotel and seemed quite annoyed by them.”

September… this year

Elie Fawaz , August 5, 2009
Now Lebanon/Wahid Gordji was officially just a translator working for the Iranian Embassy in Paris in the mid-1980s. In truth, however, he was the No. 2 man at the embassy in charge of the negotiations held with French diplomats over the issue of French hostages in Lebanon. His name was also associated in the French media with the string of terrorist attacks that plagued the country in 1986. The problem originated in France’s freezing the Iranian assets of Eurodif, a company specializing in the production of enriched uranium, in the wake of the Khomeinist revolution. The Shah of Iran had bought a 10% share in this company’s assets in 1975 and lent it $180 million during the same year in return for a right to buy off a certain fraction of its production. The problem was also rooted in France’s support to Iraq in its war against Iran.
In short, Lebanon was a stage for the settlement of international scores using Lebanese intermediaries. These events resulted in many victims, such as Michel Seurat, not to mention several others who were kidnapped, such as Roger Auque, Jean-Louis Normandin, Michel Carton, Georges Hansen and Jean-Paul Kauffmann.
The wave of terrorism targeting France ended after the payment of $1.6 billion to Iran, which retained its share in Eurodif. Wahid Gordji returned to his homeland safe and sound, having appeared before the French judiciary.
Today, Iran is locked in a conflict with the world over far more than some company assets; rather, it is about a dangerous nuclear program Iran is planning on defending with all available resources, whether domestically should it come under attack, or on the foreign level through its allies in Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine… Indeed, these fronts are reportedly fitted with an Iranian fuse ready to blow come September if the international community loses its patience with Iran and enacts sanctions that may prove dangerous for the regime in Tehran.
Is this not in keeping with Hezbollah’s renewed threat and sudden reactivation of the “southern front” by acting on the field under the guise of the South’s “inhabitants” and permanently reminding everyone that it has more than 40,000 rockets ready to be fired and capable of hitting any location in the Israeli heartland? This rhetorical and field escalation adopted by Hezbollah actually comes at a time when the South is enjoying a period of stability under Resolution 1701, which has not undergone any changes ever since it was first implemented.
Lebanon is, once again, filling in as a stage for settling regional scores and is today of a vital importance for all these forces, with one notable difference compared to the 1980s: The victims will not be French nationals this time around.
Will the yellow September be clad in black this year?
This article is a translation from the original, published on the NOW Arabic site on July 30